These warmup exercises do not need to be written up or turned in.

Similar documents
Number Theory Fall 2016 Problem Set #3

Problem 1. Characterizing Dedekind domains (64 points)

Number Theory Fall 2016 Problem Set #6

x mv = 1, v v M K IxI v = 1,

Elliptic Curves Spring 2015 Problem Set #10 Due: 4/24/2015

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Problem Set #10 Due: 12/3/2013

6 Ideal norms and the Dedekind-Kummer theorem

5 Dedekind extensions

ORAL QUALIFYING EXAM QUESTIONS. 1. Algebra

Some algebraic number theory and the reciprocity map

Elliptic Curves Spring 2019 Problem Set #7 Due: 04/08/2019

5 Dedekind extensions

Thus, the integral closure A i of A in F i is a finitely generated (and torsion-free) A-module. It is not a priori clear if the A i s are locally

Graduate Preliminary Examination

Galois theory (Part II)( ) Example Sheet 1

Elliptic Curves Spring 2013 Problem Set #5 Due: 03/19/2013

Elliptic Curves Spring 2015 Problem Set #2 Due: 02/20/2015

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO LOCAL FIELDS

Lemma 1.1. The field K embeds as a subfield of Q(ζ D ).

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #7 09/26/2013

7 Orders in Dedekind domains, primes in Galois extensions

24 Artin reciprocity in the unramified case

Imaginary Quadratic Fields With Isomorphic Abelian Galois Groups

Explicit Methods in Algebraic Number Theory

IUPUI Qualifying Exam Abstract Algebra

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM SPRING 2012

Homework 4 Solutions

ALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL

ON GALOIS GROUPS OF ABELIAN EXTENSIONS OVER MAXIMAL CYCLOTOMIC FIELDS. Mamoru Asada. Introduction

Galois Theory TCU Graduate Student Seminar George Gilbert October 2015

Algebraic number theory

Algebraic number theory Revision exercises

Algebra Exam, Spring 2017

Math 6370: Algebraic Number Theory

Real Analysis Prelim Questions Day 1 August 27, 2013

8430 HANDOUT 6: PROOF OF THE MAIN THEOREM

6]. (10) (i) Determine the units in the rings Z[i] and Z[ 10]. If n is a squarefree

Galois theory of fields

TOTALLY RAMIFIED PRIMES AND EISENSTEIN POLYNOMIALS. 1. Introduction

Material covered: Class numbers of quadratic fields, Valuations, Completions of fields.

1 Number Fields Introduction Algebraic Numbers Algebraic Integers Algebraic Integers Modules over Z...

GALOIS THEORY AT WORK: CONCRETE EXAMPLES

Algebra Qualifying Exam, Fall 2018

CLASS FIELD THEORY FOR NUMBER FIELDS AND COMPLEX MULTIPLICATION

Math 553 Qualifying Exam. In this test, you may assume all theorems proved in the lectures. All other claims must be proved.

Continuing the pre/review of the simple (!?) case...

ADVANCED COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA: PROBLEM SETS

Attempt QUESTIONS 1 and 2, and THREE other questions. penalised if you attempt additional questions.

A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander

NOTES FOR DRAGOS: MATH 210 CLASS 12, THURS. FEB. 22

FACTORIZATION OF IDEALS

Dirichlet s Theorem and Algebraic Number Fields. Pedro Sousa Vieira

IDEAL CLASSES AND RELATIVE INTEGERS

Page Points Possible Points. Total 200

1 Fields and vector spaces

FORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS

Part II Galois Theory

15 Dirichlet s unit theorem

ALGEBRA PH.D. QUALIFYING EXAM September 27, 2008

Galois groups with restricted ramification

ON 3-CLASS GROUPS OF CERTAIN PURE CUBIC FIELDS. Frank Gerth III

REDUCTION OF ELLIPTIC CURVES OVER CERTAIN REAL QUADRATIC NUMBER FIELDS

The Kummer Pairing. Alexander J. Barrios Purdue University. 12 September 2013

x = π m (a 0 + a 1 π + a 2 π ) where a i R, a 0 = 0, m Z.

A SIMPLE PROOF OF KRONECKER-WEBER THEOREM. 1. Introduction. The main theorem that we are going to prove in this paper is the following: Q ab = Q(ζ n )

The Kronecker-Weber Theorem

ALGEBRA 11: Galois theory

Algebra Qualifying Exam Solutions. Thomas Goller

CLASS FIELD THEORY WEEK Motivation

8 Complete fields and valuation rings

ON 2-CLASS FIELD TOWERS OF SOME IMAGINARY QUADRATIC NUMBER FIELDS

Algebraic Structures Exam File Fall 2013 Exam #1

ON TAMELY RAMIFIED IWASAWA MODULES FOR THE CYCLOTOMIC p -EXTENSION OF ABELIAN FIELDS

Quartic and D l Fields of Degree l with given Resolvent

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Solutions of exercise sheet 8

p-adic fields Chapter 7

MAT 535 Problem Set 5 Solutions

Algebraic Number Theory

FACTORING AFTER DEDEKIND

Assigned homework problems S. L. Kleiman, fall 2008

Primes, Polynomials, Progressions. B.Sury Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore NISER Bhubaneshwar February 15, 2016

ERRATA. Abstract Algebra, Third Edition by D. Dummit and R. Foote (most recently revised on February 14, 2018)

TOTALLY RAMIFIED PRIMES AND EISENSTEIN POLYNOMIALS. 1. Introduction

IDEAL CLASSES AND THE KRONECKER BOUND

On metacyclic extensions

Johns Hopkins University, Department of Mathematics Abstract Algebra - Spring 2013 Midterm Exam Solution

SUMMARY NUMBER THEORY II, SOMMERSEMESTER 2015

Ramification Theory. 3.1 Discriminant. Chapter 3

Algebra Questions. May 13, Groups 1. 2 Classification of Finite Groups 4. 3 Fields and Galois Theory 5. 4 Normal Forms 9

LECTURE 2. Hilbert Symbols

Notes on p-divisible Groups

EXERCISES IN MODULAR FORMS I (MATH 726) (2) Prove that a lattice L is integral if and only if its Gram matrix has integer coefficients.

Algebra Ph.D. Entrance Exam Fall 2009 September 3, 2009

Dirichlet Series Associated with Cubic and Quartic Fields


GALOIS THEORY. Contents

Elliptic Curves Spring 2015 Lecture #7 02/26/2015

Name: Solutions Final Exam

Algebraic Number Theory Notes: Local Fields

Transcription:

18.785 Number Theory Fall 2017 Problem Set #3 Description These problems are related to the material in Lectures 5 7. Your solutions should be written up in latex and submitted as a pdf-file via e-mail to the instructor on the due date. Collaboration is permitted/encouraged, but you must identify your collaborators, and any references consulted other than the lecture notes. If there are none, write Sources consulted: none at the top of your problem set. The first person to spot each typo/error in the problem set or lecture notes will receive 1 5 points of extra credit. Instructions: First do the warm up problems, then pick any combination of problems 1 6 that sums to 96 points and write up your answers in latex. Finally, be sure to complete the survey problem 7. Problem 0. Warmup (0 points) These warmup exercises do not need to be written up or turned in. (a) Show that odd primes p split over Q( d) if and only if x 2 d splits in F p [x], but that this holds for p = 2 only when d 1 mod 4. Then show that for d 1 mod 4 using x 2 x + (1 d)/4 instead of x 2 d works for every prime p. (b) Let O K be the ring of integers of an imaginary quadratic field K and let c be a positive integer. Prove that O := Z + co K is an order with conductor co K and that c = [O K : O] (the index of O in O K as additive abelian groups). (c) Let L/K be a finite Galois extension of number fields. Prove that if K has any inert primes then Gal(L/K) is cyclic (as we shall prove later, the converse holds). (d) Let L/K be a finite extension of number fields. Show that a prime of K splits completely in L if and only if it splits completely in the normal closure of L/K. Problem 1. Factoring primes in cubic fields (32 points) Let K = Q( 3 5). (a) Prove that O K = Z[ 3 5]. (b) Factor the primes p = 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13 in Q( 3 5). Write the prime ideals q appearing in your factorizations in the form (p, f( 3 5)) where f Z[x] has degree at most 2. (c) Prove that the factorization patterns you found in (b) represent every possible case; that is, every possible sum [K : Q] = q (p) e q f q that can arise for this particular field K. You should find that there is one numerically possible case that does not occur for p 13; you need to prove that it cannot occur for any prime p. (d) Find a different cubic field of the form K = Q( 3 n) for which the one factorization pattern missing from (c) does occur (demonstrate this explicitly). 1

Problem 2. Factoring primes in cyclotomic fields (32 points) Let l be a prime and let ζ l denote a primitive lth root of unity. (a) Prove that Q(ζ l )/Q is a Galois extension. (b) Prove that Z[ζ l ] is the ring of integers of Q(ζ l ). (c) For each prime p l, determine the number g p of primes q of Q(ζ l ) lying above (p), the ramification index e p and the residue field degree f p (as a function of p and l). (d) Do the same for p = l. Problem 3. Non-monogenic fields (32 points) Recall that a number field K is said to be monogenic if its ring of integers O K is of the form Z[α ] for some α O K. Every number field of degree 2 is monogenic; indeed, for K = Q( d) we can take α = (d ± d)/2. In this problem you will prove that infinitely many number fields of degrees 3 and 4 are not monogenic. (a) Let K be a number field of degree n > 2 in which the prime 2 splits completely (so 2O K is the product of n distinct prime ideals). Prove that K is not monogenic. (b) Prove that if 2 splits completely in number fields K 1 and K 2 then it also splits completely in their compositum (the smallest number field containing K 1 and K 2 ). (c) Show that if p ± 1 mod 8 is prime, then 2 splits completely in Q( ±p) (with the same sign in both ±). Conclude that for each k 2, infinitely many number fields of degree 2 k are not monogenic and give a quartic example. 1 (d) Consider K = Q( 3 ab 2 ), with a, b Z coprime, squarefree, and a 2 b 2 mod 9. Dedekind showed that (1, 3 ab 2, 3 a 2 b) is a Z-basis for O K. Show that for every α O K Z, the index [O K : Z[α]] has the form ar 3 bs 3, with r, s Z. Show that infinitely many cubic number fields are not monogenic and give an example. Problem 4. Orders in Dedekind domains (32 points) Let O be an order (noetherian domain of dimension one with nonzero conductor) with integral closure B (a Dedekind domain) and conductor c (largest B-ideal in O). (a) Prove that for a prime p of O the following are equivalent: (1) p does not contain c; (2) O = {x B : xp p}; (3) p is invertible (as a fractional O-ideal); (4) O p is a DVR; (5) po p is a principal O p -ideal. Then show that these equivalent conditions all imply that pb is a prime B-ideal. 1 You may assume Dirichlet s theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions, which we will prove later in the course: for any coprime a, m Z there are infinitely many primes p a mod m. 2

(b) Prove that nonzero fractional ideals I of O prime to c are invertible, but the converse need not hold (give an explicit counterexample). (c) Let K Q be a number field with ring of integers O K, let c Z >1, and let O := Z + co K = {a + b : a Z, b co K }. Prove that O is an order with integral closure O K and conductor co K, and that co K is not principal as an O-ideal. (d) Let K := Q(i) with O K = Z[i], let p be any prime, and let O := Z + piz. Show that the conductor of O is p := pz + piz, that p is a prime O-ideal, and that a := p 2 Z + piz is an O-ideal contained in p but not divisible by p. Problem 5. A relative extension without an integral basis (32 points) Let K be the quadratic field Q( 6) with ring of integers A = Z[ 6], let L := K( 3) be a quadratic extension, and let B be the integral closure of A in L (so AKLB holds). (a) Let ζ 3 := 1+ 3 2. Show that {1, 2, ζ 3 } generates B as an A-module. Conclude that B is a torsion free A-module, and that if it is a free A-module, it has rank 2. (b) Show that if B A 2, then {1, ζ 3 } is an A-module basis for B (hint: show that if {β 1, β 2 } is any A-module basis for B, then the matrix that expresses {1, ζ 3 } in terms of this basis is invertible; to do so you may also want to write {1, σ(ζ 3 )} in terms of {σ(β 1 ), σ(β 2 )} with σ Gal(L/K)). (d) Sho w that {1, ζ 3} is not an A-module basis for B by showing that you cannot write 2 in terms of this basis. Conclude that B is not a free A-module and that the ideal class group cl(a) := I A /P A is non-trivial. (d) Show that the A-module B is isomorphic to the A-module I 1 I 2, where I 1, I 2 I A are the fractional A-ideals I (ζ 3 ) and I 2 := 3 (3, 6). 1 := 1 Problem 6. Modules over Dedekind domains (64 points) Let us recall some terminology from commutative algebra. Let A be a ring and let M be an A-module. A splitting of a surjective A-module homomorphism ψ : N M is an A-module homomorphism φ: M N such that ψ φ is the identity map; we then have N = φ(m) ker(ψ) M ker(ψ). We say that M is projective if every surjective A-module homomorphism ψ : N M admits a splitting φ: M N. A torsion element m M satisfies am = 0 for some nonzero a A. If M consists entirely of torsion elements then it is a torsion module. If M has no nonzero torsion elements then it is torsion free. Note that the zero module is a torsion-free torsion module. Now let A be a Dedekind domain with fraction field K. (a) Prove that every finitely generated torsion A-module M is isomorphic to A/I 1 A/I n, for some nonzero A-ideals I 1,..., I n (you may use the structure theorem for modules over PIDs). 3

(b) Prove that every fractional ideal of A is a projective A-module. (c) Prove that every finitely generated torsion-free A-module M is isomorphic to a finite direct sum of nonzero fractional ideals of A (elements of I A ). (d) Prove that every finitely generated A-module is isomorphic to the direct sum of a finitely generated torsion module and a finitely generated torsion-free module. (e) Show that if M is a finitely generated A-module then M A K K r for some r Z 0, and that for M I A we must have r = 1. (f) Let M be a finitely generated torsion-free A-module, and let us fix an isomorphism ι: M A K K n that embeds M in K n via m ι(m 1). Let N be the A- submodule of K generated by the determinants of all n n matrices whose columns lie in M. Prove that N I A and that its ideal class (its image in the ideal class group cl(a) := I A /P A ) is independent of ι; this is the Steinitz class of M. (g) Prove that for any I 1,..., I n I A the Steinitz class of I 1 I n is the ideal class of the product I 1 I n. (h) Prove that two finite direct sums I 1 I m and J 1 J n of elements of I A are isomorphic as A-modules if and only if m = n and the ideal classes of I 1 I m and J 1 J n are equal. (i) Prove that infinite direct sums i=1 I i and j=1 J j of elements of I A are always isomorphic as A-modules. Problem 7. Survey (4 points) Complete the following survey by rating each problem you attempted on a scale of 1 to 10 according to how interesting you found it (1 = mind-numbing, 10 = mind-blowing ), and how difficult you found it (1 = trivial, 10 = brutal ). Also estimate the amount of time you spent on each problem to the nearest half hour. Problem 1 Problem 2 Problem 3 Problem 4 Problem 5 Problem 6 Interest Difficulty Time Spent Please rate each of the following lectures that you attended, according to the quality of the material (1= useless, 10= fascinating ), the quality of the presentation (1= epic fail, 10= perfection ), the pace (1= way too slow, 10= way too fast, 5= just right ) and the novelty of the material to you (1= old hat, 10= all new ). Date Lecture Topic Material Presentation Pace Novelty 9/25 Ideal norms, Dedekind-Kummer 9/27 Primes in Galois extensions Please feel free to record any additional comments you have on the problem sets and the lectures, in particular, ways in which they might be improved. 4

MIT OpenCourseWare https://ocw.mit.edu 18.785 Number Theory I Fall 2017 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: https://ocw.mit.edu/terms.