THE GEOMETRY OF B-FIELDS. Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) Odense November 26th 2009

Similar documents
B-FIELDS, GERBES AND GENERALIZED GEOMETRY

Higgs Bundles and Character Varieties

Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) Poisson 2012 Utrecht. August 2nd 2012

Dirac structures. Henrique Bursztyn, IMPA. Geometry, mechanics and dynamics: the legacy of J. Marsden Fields Institute, July 2012

Poisson modules and generalized geometry

Generalized complex geometry and topological sigma-models

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY AND THE QUATERNIONS. Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) The Chern Lectures Berkeley April 9th-18th 2013

An Invitation to Geometric Quantization

HAMILTONIAN ACTIONS IN GENERALIZED COMPLEX GEOMETRY

Moduli Space of Higgs Bundles Instructor: Marco Gualtieri

Linear connections on Lie groups

Dedicated to the memory of Shiing-Shen Chern

12 Geometric quantization

Generalized complex geometry

Lectures on generalized geometry

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

Torus actions and Ricci-flat metrics

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 6 Jul 1999 LECTURES ON SPECIAL LAGRANGIAN SUBMANIFOLDS

Hyperkähler geometry lecture 3

Topic: First Chern classes of Kähler manifolds Mitchell Faulk Last updated: April 23, 2016

C-spaces, Gerbes and Patching DFT

EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

Generalized complex geometry and supersymmetric non-linear sigma models

Deformations of coisotropic submanifolds in symplectic geometry

Twisted Poisson manifolds and their almost symplectically complete isotropic realizations

Some brief notes on the Kodaira Vanishing Theorem

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

Conification of Kähler and hyper-kähler manifolds and supergr

LECTURE 5: COMPLEX AND KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

Smooth Dynamics 2. Problem Set Nr. 1. Instructor: Submitted by: Prof. Wilkinson Clark Butler. University of Chicago Winter 2013

On the holonomy fibration

Holonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. Mathematics Colloquium School of Mathematics and Physics The University of Queensland. October 31, 2011 May 28, 2012

L6: Almost complex structures

Hamilton-Jacobi theory on Lie algebroids: Applications to nonholonomic mechanics. Manuel de León Institute of Mathematical Sciences CSIC, Spain

The Geometry behind Nongeometric Fluxes

Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky

Generalized complex geometry

η = (e 1 (e 2 φ)) # = e 3

Simon Salamon. Turin, 24 April 2004

Deformations of Coisotropic Submanifolds of Jacobi Manifolds

1 Introduction and preliminaries notions

Quantising noncompact Spin c -manifolds

REDUCTION OF METRIC STRUCTURES ON COURANT ALGEBROIDS. Gil R. Cavalcanti

The Strominger Yau Zaslow conjecture

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

PREQUANTIZATION OF SYMPLECTIC SUPERMANIFOLDS

The Calabi Conjecture

As always, the story begins with Riemann surfaces or just (real) surfaces. (As we have already noted, these are nearly the same thing).

Complex manifolds, Kahler metrics, differential and harmonic forms

A RESULT ON NIJENHUIS OPERATOR

The Spinor Representation

Generalized CRF-structures

Mathematical Research Letters 2, (1995) A VANISHING THEOREM FOR SEIBERG-WITTEN INVARIANTS. Shuguang Wang

The exceptional holonomy groups and calibrated geometry

LECTURE 1: LINEAR SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY

A Crash Course of Floer Homology for Lagrangian Intersections

THE NEWLANDER-NIRENBERG THEOREM. GL. The frame bundle F GL is given by x M Fx

Hard Lefschetz Theorem for Vaisman manifolds

How to recognise a conformally Einstein metric?

Contact manifolds and generalized complex structures

Math. Res. Lett. 13 (2006), no. 1, c International Press 2006 ENERGY IDENTITY FOR ANTI-SELF-DUAL INSTANTONS ON C Σ.

DIRAC STRUCTURES FROM LIE INTEGRABILITY

Moment Maps and Toric Special Holonomy

Transparent connections

An introduction to General Relativity and the positive mass theorem

Higher dimensional knot spaces for manifolds with vector cross product

Modern Geometric Structures and Fields

Gravity theory on Poisson manifold with R-flux

Symplectic and Poisson Manifolds

Constructing compact 8-manifolds with holonomy Spin(7)

Symplectic geometry of deformation spaces

Integrating exact Courant Algebroids

BERGMAN KERNEL ON COMPACT KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

Two simple ideas from calculus applied to Riemannian geometry

Geodesic Equivalence in sub-riemannian Geometry

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

LAGRANGIAN HOMOLOGY CLASSES WITHOUT REGULAR MINIMIZERS

Generalized Contact Structures

WICK ROTATIONS AND HOLOMORPHIC RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

Complex and real hypersurfaces of locally conformal Kähler manifolds

Twistor constructions of quaternionic manifolds and asymptotically hyperbolic Einstein Weyl spaces. Aleksandra Borówka. University of Bath

Metrics and Holonomy

Integration of non linear conservation laws?

-Chern-Simons functionals

H-projective structures and their applications

PAPER 309 GENERAL RELATIVITY

The Higgs bundle moduli space

arxiv:math-ph/ v1 20 Sep 2004

Math 868 Final Exam. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each). Y (φ t ) Y lim

Contents. Preface...VII. Introduction... 1

Lorenz SCHWACHHÖFER. Symplectic connections via integration of Poisson structures

Generalized Kähler Geometry

THE VORTEX EQUATION ON AFFINE MANIFOLDS. 1. Introduction

On the existence of isoperimetric extremals of rotation and the fundamental equations of rotary diffeomorphisms

Eigenvalue estimates for Dirac operators with torsion II

Renormalized Volume of Hyperbolic 3-Manifolds

Contact and Symplectic Geometry of Monge-Ampère Equations: Introduction and Examples

QUANTIZATION OF A DIMENSIONALLY REDUCED SEIBERG-WITTEN MODULI SPACE RUKMINI DEY

Geometric Quantization

Transcription:

THE GEOMETRY OF B-FIELDS Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) Odense November 26th 2009

THE B-FIELD IN PHYSICS B = i,j B ij dx i dx j flux: db = H a closed three-form Born-Infeld action: det(g ij + B ij ) complexified Kähler moduli : [B + iω] H 2 (M, C)

A: VECTOR POTENTIAL Maxwell B = 0 B = A

TOPOLOGY

φ = m/r, 2 φ = 0 B = φ on R 3 \{0} what is A?

φ = m/r, 2 φ = 0 B = φ on R 3 \{0} } what is A? on a contractible open set U α, find A α with A α = B

φ = m/r, 2 φ = 0 B = φ on R 3 \{0} } what is A? on a contractible open set U α, find A α with A α = B... on U α U β, A β A α = f αβ

φ = m/r, 2 φ = 0 B = φ on R 3 \{0} } what is A? on a contractible open set U α, find A α with A α = B... on U α U β, A β A α = f αβ f αβ + f βγ + f γα = const. = c αβγ on U α U β U γ

Suppose φ = k/2r, k Z, (Dirac quantization condition)...then find f αβ such that c αβγ 2πZ Define g αβ = exp(if αβ ), then... g αβ g βγ g γα = 1

Stick together U α S 1 and U β S 1 using g αβ...... to get a principal S 1 -bundle P.

Stick together U α S 1 and U β S 1 using g αβ...... to get a principal S 1 -bundle P. A α is a connection on P : A = i A i dx i A β A α = g 1 αβ dg αβ/i da α = da β = curvature F

GERBES g αβγ : U α U β U γ S 1 (g αβγ = g 1 βαγ =...) δg = g βγδ g 1 αγδ g αβδg 1 αβγ = 1 on U α U β U γ U δ

CONNECTIONS ON GERBES

CONNECTIONS ON GERBES Connective structure: A αβ + A βγ + A γα = g 1 αβγ dg αβγ/i

CONNECTIONS ON GERBES Connective structure: A αβ + A βγ + A γα = g 1 αβγ dg αβγ/i Curving: B β B α = da αβ db β = db α = H Uα global three-form H

principal circle bundle: connection A α A Ω 1, A α A + A α new connection, F F + da

principal circle bundle: connection A α A Ω 1, A α A + A α new connection, F F + da gerbe: connective structure + curving A αβ, B α B Ω 2, B α B + B α new curving, H H + db

ALGEBRA OF BRACKETS

BRACKETS Invariant vector field on P = M S 1 X + f section of T 1 [X + f, Y + g] = [X, Y ] + Xg Y f

BRACKETS Invariant vector field on P = M S 1 X + f section of T 1 [X + f, Y + g] = [X, Y ] + Xg Y f (X, f) (X, f + i X A) If da = 0 bracket unchanged

BRACKETS Invariant vector field on P = M S 1 X + f section of T 1 [X + f, Y + g] = [X, Y ] + Xg Y f (X, f) (X, f + i X A) If da = 0 bracket unchanged A = g 1 dg gauge transformation

X + ξ, Y + η sections of T T Courant bracket: [X + ξ, Y + η] = [X, Y ] + L X η L Y ξ 1 2 d(i Xη i Y ξ)

X + ξ, Y + η sections of T T Courant bracket: [X + ξ, Y + η] = [X, Y ] + L X η L Y ξ 1 2 d(i Xη i Y ξ)

X + ξ, Y + η sections of T T Courant bracket: [X + ξ, Y + η] = [X, Y ] + L X η L Y ξ 1 2 d(i Xη i Y ξ) B two-form (X, ξ) (X, ξ + i X B) If db = 0, the bracket is unchanged

GENERALIZED GEOMETRY

53C99 None of the above, but in this section 53Dxx Symplectic geometry, contact geometry [See also 37Jxx, 70Gxx, 70Hxx] 53D05 Symplectic manifolds, general 53D10 Contact manifolds, general 53D12 Lagrangian submanifolds; Maslov index 53D15 Almost contact and almost symplectic manifolds 53D17 Poisson manifolds; Poisson groupoids and algebroids 53D18 Generalized geometries (à la Hitchin) 53D20 Momentum maps; symplectic reduction 53D22 Canonical transformations 53D25 Geodesic flows 54-06 Pro etc. 54Axx Gen 54A05 Top (clo 54A10 Sev top tice 54A15 Syn 54A20 Con (seq spa 54A25 Car tion

manifold M n replace T by T T inner product of signature (n, n) (X + ξ, X + ξ) = i X ξ

manifold M n replace T by T T inner product of signature (n, n) (X + ξ, X + ξ) = i X ξ skew adjoint transformations: End T Λ 2 T Λ 2 T... in particular B Λ 2 T

B-FIELDS two-form B X + ξ X + ξ + i X B... is an orthogonal transformation of T T... which preserves the Courant bracket if B is closed

Generalized symmetry group G = Diff(M) Ω 2 closed (M) X + ξ X + dξ g [X + ξ, Y + η] [X + dξ, Y + dη]

Riemannian metric g ij X g(x, ) : g : T T graph of g = V T T X + gx V, inner product (X + gx, X + gx) = g(x, X)

T * graph of g T graph of!g

GENERALIZED RIEMANNIAN METRIC V T T positive definite rank n subbundle = graph of g + B : T T g + B T T : g symmetric, B skew

GENERALIZED RIEMANNIAN METRIC V T T positive definite rank n subbundle = graph of g + B : T T g + B T T : g symmetric, B skew T T natural structure group SO(n, n) generalized metric: reduction to maximal compact SO(n) SO(n)

T * graph of g T graph of!g

T * graph of g X T graph of!g

T * graph of g X + X T X graph of!g

[X, Y + ] defines the Levi-Civita connection X Y 2g lk Γ l ij dx k = = [ x i g ik dx k, ( gjk + g ik g ) ij dx k x i x j x k ] + g jk dx k x j

B-FIELD TRANSFORM 2g lk Γ l ij dx k = = [ x i g ik dx k + B ik dx k, ( gjk + g ik g ) ij dx k + x i x j x k ] + g jk dx k + B jk dx k x j ( Bjk x i B ) ik dx k. x j H ijk = B jk x i B ik x j Riemannian connection with skew torsion H = db

B-FIELD TRANSFORM 2g lk Γ l ij dx k = = [ x i g ik dx k + B ik dx k, ( gjk + g ik g ) ij dx k + x i x j x k ] + g jk dx k + B jk dx k x j ( Bjk x i B ) ik dx k. x j H ijk = B jk x i B ik x j Riemannian connection with skew torsion H = db flux

THE B-FIELD IN PHYSICS B = i,j B ij dx i dx j flux: db = H a closed three-form Born-Infeld action: det(g ij + B ij ) complexified Kähler moduli : [B + iω] H 2 (M, C)

THE B-FIELD IN PHYSICS B = i,j B ij dx i dx j flux: db = H a closed three-form Born-Infeld action: det(g ij + B ij ) complexified Kähler moduli : [B + iω] H 2 (M, C)

GENERALIZED COMPLEX STRUCTURES

A generalized complex structure is: J : T T T T, J 2 = 1 (JA, B) + (A, JB) = 0 if JA = ia, JB = ib then J[A, B] = i[a, B] (Courant bracket)

A generalized complex structure is: J : T T T T, J 2 = 1 (JA, B) + (A, JB) = 0 if JA = ia, JB = ib then J[A, B] = i[a, B] (Courant bracket) U(m, m) SO(2m, 2m) structure on T T

EXAMPLES complex manifold J = ( I 0 0 I ) J = i : [... / z i...,... d z i...] symplectic manifold J = ( 0 ω 1 ω 0 ) J = i : [..., / x j + i ω jk dx k,...]

T T T is isotropic and closed under Courant bracket

T T T is isotropic and closed under Courant bracket iω = complex B-field (symplectic structure) X + i X (iω) spans +i-eigenspace of J

T T T is isotropic and closed under Courant bracket iω = complex B-field (symplectic structure) X + i X (iω) spans +i-eigenspace of J transform by any closed B: X + i X (B + iω) defines a generalized complex structure

T T T is isotropic and closed under Courant bracket iω = complex B-field (symplectic structure) X + i X (iω) spans +i-eigenspace of J transform by any closed B: X + i X (B + iω) defines a generalized complex structure

WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF A B-FIELD?

generalized geometric structure closed 2-form B transform to a new structure

GENERALIZED METRIC 2g lk Γ l ij dx k = = [ x i g ik dx k + B ik dx k, ( gjk + g ik g ) ij dx k + x i x j x k ] + g jk dx k + B jk dx k x j ( Bjk x i B ) ik dx k. x j H ijk = B jk x i B ik x j Riemannian connection with skew torsion H = db B closed no change

GENERALIZED COMPLEX SUBMANIFOLDS Submanifold Y M, 0 T Y T M Y NY 0 T Y (T Y ) o = T Y N Y (T M T M) Y J preserves T Y N Y generalized complex submanifold

COMPLEX THE COMPLEX CASE Generalized complex submanifold = complex submanifold

COMPLEX THE COMPLEX CASE Generalized complex submanifold = complex submanifold SYMPLECTIC ) ) ( 0 ω 1 ω 0 ) ( X ξ = ( ω 1 ξ ωx ω 1 ξ T Y Y coisotropic ωx N Y isotropic Y is Lagrangian submanifold

SYMPLECTIC + B-FIELD J ( X ξ ) = ( ω 1 ) (ξ + BX) (ω + Bω 1 B)X + Bω 1 ξ

SYMPLECTIC + B-FIELD J ( ) ( ( X ) ( ξ = ω 1 (ξ + BX) (ω + Bω 1 B)X + Bω 1 ξ ) X = 0 ω 1 ξ T Y Y coisotropic

SYMPLECTIC + B-FIELD J ( ) ( X ω 1 ) ( ) ( (ξ + BX) ) ξ = (ω + Bω 1 B)X + Bω 1 ξ X = 0 ω 1 ξ T Y Y coisotropic Im ω 1 ξ = foliation, transversally symplectic B + iω transverse holomorphic symplectic form

e.g. HOLOMORPHIC SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLD complex manifold M holomorphic symplectic form ω c = ω 1 + iω 2 = B + iω

e.g. HOLOMORPHIC SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLD complex manifold M holomorphic symplectic form ω c = ω 1 + iω 2 = B + iω a generalized complex submanifold is a coisotropic complex submanifold e.g. any complex hypersurface, or M itself.

GENERALIZED COMPLEX STRUCTURES complex manifold (T T ) 0,1 = [... / z i...,... d z i...] B type (1, 1), then z i + i / zi B = z i + B i j d z j (T T ) 1,0 B closed B-field which preserves the generalized complex structure

GENERALIZED COMPLEX STRUCTURES complex manifold (T T ) 0,1 = [... / z i...,... d z i...] B type (1, 1), then z i + i / zi B = z i + B i j d z j (T T ) 1,0 B closed B-field which preserves the generalized complex structure Hamiltonian f symmetry f

complex structure on T T df T T T f = (T T ) 0,1 component

complex structure on T T df T T T f = (T T ) 0,1 component complex (T T ) 0,1 = [... z i...,... d z i...], f = f z i d z i symplectic f = 1 2 x i ( dx i + iω ij x j )

A generalized holomorphic bundle is: a vector bundle V a differential operator D : C (V ) C (V (T T ) 0,1 ) such that D(fs) = f Ds + fs and D 2 = 0 C (V Λ 2 (T T ) 0,1 )

EXAMPLE complex structure: co-higgs bundle: (i) holomorphic structure on V (ii) holomorphic section φ H 0 (M, End V T ) (iii)... such that φ 2 = 0 H 0 (M, End V Λ 2 T ) Ds = ( s z µ + A µ s ) d z µ + φ ν s z ν

B-FIELD TRANSFORM Ds = ( ) s + A µ s d z µ + φ ν s z µ z ν Transform: Ds = ( ) s + A µ + φ ν B ν µ s d z µ + φ ν s z µ z ν New holomorphic structure B = + i φ B B φ = 0

EXAMPLE: DIMENSION ONE M = CP 1 tangent bundle T = O(2) generically V is trivial, φ H 0 (CP 1, O(2)) gl(m) φ = (φ 0 + φ 1 z + φ 2 z 2 ) d dz φ 2 = 0 trivially

spectral curve det(η φ) = η m + a 1 η m 1 +... + a m = 0 S T CP 1 p CP 1 a i H 0 (CP 1, O(2i)), η H 0 (T CP 1, p O(2)) tautological L line bundle on S V = p L, φ = p η : V V (2) direct image

DIRECT IMAGE SHEAF p : X Y U Y open set H 0 (U, p L) = H 0 (p 1 (U), L) p : S CP 1 m-fold covering V = p L rank m vector bundle

B Ω 1,1 (CP 1 ) change holomorphic structure on V by V V + i φ B

B Ω 1,1 (CP 1 ) change holomorphic structure on V by V V + i φ B change holomorphic structure on L by L L + i η B [i η B] H 1 (T CP 1, O) L L + ti η B linear flow on Jacobian of S

NAHM FLOW φ H 0 (CP 1, O(2)) gl(m) V trivial φ = (T 1 + it 2 ) + 2T 3 z (T 1 it 2 )z 2 Nahm equations: dt 1 dt = [T 2, T 3 ] dt 2 dt = [T 3, T 1 ] dt 3 dt = [T 1, T 2 ] NJH, On the construction of monopoles, Comm. Math. Phys. 89 (1983) 145-190.

line bundles gerbes 2-gerbes...

line bundles gerbes 2-gerbes...... p 1 (T ), Chern-Simons,...

T 1 T T T Λ 2 T

T 1 T T T Λ 2 T [X + ξ, Y + η] = [X, Y ] + L X η L Y ξ 1 2 d(i Xη i Y ξ)

C.M.Hull, Generalised geometry for M-theory, J.High Energy Phys. 07, (2007) P.P.Pacheco & D.Waldram, Exceptional generalised geometry and superpotentials, arxiv/hep-th: 08041362

n E n R SL(n, ) reps E 2 SL(2, ) 2+1 2+1 E T Λ 2 T 3 SL(3, ) SL(2, ) (3, 2) 3 + 3 E T Λ 2 T 4 SL(5, ) 10 4 + 6 E T Λ 2 T 5 Spin(5, 5) 16 5 + 10 + 1 E T Λ 2 T Λ 5 T 6 E 6(6) 27(+1) 6 + 15 + 6(+1) E T Λ 2 T Λ 5 T ( Λ 6 T ) 7 E 7(7) 56 7 + 21 + 21 + 7 E T Λ 2 T Λ 5 T Λ 6 T

n E n R SL(n, ) reps E 2 SL(2, ) 2+1 2+1 E T Λ 2 T 3 SL(3, ) SL(2, ) (3, 2) 3 + 3 E T Λ 2 T 4 SL(5, ) 10 4 + 6 E T Λ 2 T 5 Spin(5, 5) 16 5 + 10 + 1 E T Λ 2 T Λ 5 T 6 E 6(6) 27(+1) 6 + 15 + 6(+1) E T Λ 2 T Λ 5 T ( Λ 6 T ) 7 E 7(7) 56 7 + 21 + 21 + 7 E T Λ 2 T Λ 5 T Λ 6 T