Science with EUCLID. 30 Avril 2014

Similar documents
Euclid and MSE. Y. Mellier IAP and CEA/SAp.

Énergie noire Formation des structures. N. Regnault C. Yèche

Euclid. Mapping the Geometry of the Dark Universe. Y. Mellier on behalf of the. Euclid Consortium.

Cosmology with the ESA Euclid Mission

SKA-Euclid Synergy: a summary

Cosmological surveys: from Planck to Euclid

Dark Energy. Cluster counts, weak lensing & Supernovae Ia all in one survey. Survey (DES)

Dark Energy in Light of the CMB. (or why H 0 is the Dark Energy) Wayne Hu. February 2006, NRAO, VA

eboss Lyman-α Forest Cosmology

The Power. of the Galaxy Power Spectrum. Eric Linder 13 February 2012 WFIRST Meeting, Pasadena

Jorge Cervantes-Cota, ININ. on behalf of the DESI Collaboration

Observational cosmology: the RENOIR team. Master 2 session

Cosmology II: The thermal history of the Universe

Supernovae with Euclid

EUCLID Spectroscopy. Andrea Cimatti. & the EUCLID-NIS Team. University of Bologna Department of Astronomy

What are the Big Questions and how can Radio Telescopes help answer them? Roger Blandford KIPAC Stanford

LSS: Achievements & Goals. John Peacock Munich 20 July 2015

First Cosmology Results from Planck. Alessandro Melchiorri University of Rome La Sapienza On behalf of the Planck collaboration

BAO and Lyman-α with BOSS

BAO & RSD. Nikhil Padmanabhan Essential Cosmology for the Next Generation December, 2017

Science Drivers for the European Extremely Large Telescope

Cosmology with high (z>1) redshift galaxy surveys

Analyzing the CMB Brightness Fluctuations. Position of first peak measures curvature universe is flat

Cosmology and Large Scale Structure

The Millennium Simulation: cosmic evolution in a supercomputer. Simon White Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics

Mario Santos (on behalf of the Cosmology SWG) Stockholm, August 24, 2015

Modern Cosmology / Scott Dodelson Contents

SKA radio cosmology: Correlation with other data

Cosmology. Jörn Wilms Department of Physics University of Warwick.

HI and Continuum Cosmology

Can kinetic Sunyaev-Zel dovich effect be used to detect the interaction between DE and DM? Bin Wang Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Physical Cosmology 6/6/2016

Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Beyond: Galaxy Clustering as Dark Energy Probe

Results from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS)

Crurent and Future Massive Redshift Surveys

OVERVIEW OF NEW CMB RESULTS

What do we really know about Dark Energy?

Cosmology The Road Map

Determining neutrino masses from cosmology

Large Scale Structure with the Lyman-α Forest

BAO & RSD. Nikhil Padmanabhan Essential Cosmology for the Next Generation VII December 2017

Galaxy Clusters in Stage 4 and Beyond

SDSS-IV and eboss Science. Hyunmi Song (KIAS)

Neutrino Mass Limits from Cosmology

A5682: Introduction to Cosmology Course Notes. 11. CMB Anisotropy

Recent BAO observations and plans for the future. David Parkinson University of Sussex, UK

New techniques to measure the velocity field in Universe.

Really, really, what universe do we live in?

BAO errors from past / future surveys. Reid et al. 2015, arxiv:

Planck constraints on neutrinos. Massimiliano Lattanzi Università di Ferrara on behalf of the Planck Collaboration

Concordance Cosmology and Particle Physics. Richard Easther (Yale University)

Outline. Walls, Filaments, Voids. Cosmic epochs. Jeans length I. Jeans length II. Cosmology AS7009, 2008 Lecture 10. λ =

Mapping the Universe spectroscopic surveys for BAO measurements Meeting on fundamental cosmology, june 2016, Barcelona, Spain Johan Comparat

The Euclid Mission. Konrad Kuijken on behalf of the Euclid Consortium.

COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND ANISOTROPIES

Galaxy Formation Now and Then

Late time cosmology with GWs

Large Scale Structure (Galaxy Correlations)

TMT and Space-Based Survey Missions

El Universo en Expansion. Juan García-Bellido Inst. Física Teórica UAM Benasque, 12 Julio 2004

Shant Baghram. Séminaires de l'iap. IPM-Tehran 13 September 2013

A5682: Introduction to Cosmology Course Notes. 11. CMB Anisotropy

Moment of beginning of space-time about 13.7 billion years ago. The time at which all the material and energy in the expanding Universe was coincident

From quasars to dark energy Adventures with the clustering of luminous red galaxies

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

Introduction. How did the universe evolve to what it is today?

The oldest science? One of the most rapidly evolving fields of modern research. Driven by observations and instruments

Galaxies 626. Lecture 3: From the CMBR to the first star

Brief Introduction to Cosmology

Observational evidence for Dark energy

Synergies between and E-ELT

Cosmology. Introduction Geometry and expansion history (Cosmic Background Radiation) Growth Secondary anisotropies Large Scale Structure

Science advances by a combination of normal science and discovery of anomalies.

An Introduction to the Dark Energy Survey

Feeding the Beast. Chris Impey (University of Arizona)

The dark matter in galaxy. Françoise Combes

Lecture 7:Our Universe

Illuminating the Dark Ages: Luminous Quasars in the Epoch of Reionisation. Bram Venemans MPIA Heidelberg

Cosmological observables and the nature of dark matter

Physics of the Large Scale Structure. Pengjie Zhang. Department of Astronomy Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Really, what universe do we live in? White dwarfs Supernova type Ia Accelerating universe Cosmic shear Lyman α forest

The ultimate measurement of the CMB temperature anisotropy field UNVEILING THE CMB SKY

Astronomy 730. Evolution

Outline: Part II. The end of the dark ages. Structure formation. Merging cold dark matter halos. First stars z t Univ Myr.

Clusters of Galaxies with Euclid

Modified gravity as an alternative to dark energy. Lecture 3. Observational tests of MG models

2013: A Good Year for Cosmology A Brief History of Contemporary Cosmology

HI Galaxy Science with SKA1. Erwin de Blok (ASTRON, NL) on behalf of The HI Science Working Group

EUCLID Cosmology Probes

LSST + BigBOSS. 3.5 deg. 3 deg

The Early Universe John Peacock ESA Cosmic Vision Paris, Sept 2004

The Once and Future CMB

Constraining Fundamental Physics with Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering. Roland de Pu+er JPL/Caltech COSMO- 14

Fundamental cosmology from the galaxy distribution. John Peacock Hiroshima 1 Dec 2016

Effective Field Theory approach for Dark Energy/ Modified Gravity. Bin HU BNU

Basic BAO methodology Pressure waves that propagate in the pre-recombination universe imprint a characteristic scale on

Cosmological Constraints from Redshift Dependence of Galaxy Clustering Anisotropy

Planck 2015 parameter constraints

First Light And Reionization. Nick Gnedin

Modified gravity. Kazuya Koyama ICG, University of Portsmouth

Transcription:

Françoise Combes On behalf of Euclid Consortium Science with EUCLID 30 Avril 2014 1

Cosmology, Dark energy Kowalski et al 2008 Concordance model, between CMB, Supernovae Ia, Large-scale structure (weak lensing, BAO..) P = w r w(a)= w0 +wa (1-a) W L wo~-1 wa~0 W m 2

Main questions in cosmology Matter in the Universe Dark matter/visible matter vs z DM DE Dark energy: Is it varying with time? How is the Universe re-ionized? End of the dark age: cosmic dawn, EoR baryons Planck How do baryons assemble into the large-scale structures? Galaxy formation and evolution (mergers, cold accretion) Star formation history, quenching Environment: groups and galaxy clusters 3

Transition between DM and DE The DE was not significative until very recently, At z ~ 1 or less The transition is very close and we are able to see it in optical and near infrared Domain of Euclid 4

Translation into Main Parameters 1-What is dark energy: w P= w r Equation of state and nature of DE, through expansion and growth rates, 5 tools: Weak Lensing, BAO, RSD, Clusters, ISW 2-Gravity beyond Einstein: g Testing modified gravity, by measuring growth rate exponent g 3-The nature of dark matter, m n Testing the CDM theory, and measuring neutrino mass 4- The seeds of cosmic structures Improve by a factor 20, n= spectral index, s 8 =amplitude of power spectrum, f NL = non-gaussiantities 5

What do we know with CMB Planck Large Scales -- Not enough power at low-l 6 Wb, Wc, Peak position flatness - Amplitude s8 (at 8Mpc/ h)

CMB anisotropies Small scales with ACT Atacama Cosmology Tel (Das et al 2013) and South Pole Telescope SPT (Story et al 2012) No detection of f nl (non Gaussianity) Slope of power-spectrum, ns, departure from scale-invariant ns= 0.960 ± 0.0070 inflation z(reion)= 11.1 + 1.1 optical depth t = 0.091 + 0.01 7

Mass and number of neutrinos With extra mass-less neutrinos with one sterile massive neutrino -- thermal mass Planck coll (2013) Paper XVI Neutrino mass constraint from power-spectrum (free-streaming) N eff could be higher due to lepton asymmetry or the existence of a sterile neutrino With Euclid s (M n ) = 0.03 ev, s(n eff ) = 0.02 8

BAO: Standard Ruler Alcock & Paczynski (1979) Test of cosmological cst Observer c Dz/H Dq D Could test the bias b Or b = W m 0.6 /b Eisenstein et al. (2005) 50 000 galaxies SDSS c Dz/H = Dq D Possibility to determine H(z)

Recent BAO spectro-z data Excellent agreement With LCDM (grey) D V (2.34) = 4628 Mpc Anderson et al 2012 Slosar et al 2013 Delubac et al 2014 10

BAO in the Lya forest at z=2.3 137 000 BOSS quasars 2.1 < z < 3.5 Blue Lya autocorrelation Red: Quasar-Lya cross-correl (Font-Ribera et al 2013) Black: combined Delubac et al 2014 Red data points compared to the Mock quasar simulations (grey) rd Sound horizon at the drag epoch D A angular dist, D H = c /H Tension with Planck at 2.5s 11

RSD Redshift space distortions Distortions due to peculiar velocities on the line of sight (fingers of god!) Kaiser effect in clusters Systematic infall More than random allows to determine b = W m 0.6 /b bias δ galaxies = b (δ mass ) and s gal 12

Status of RSD measures Various galaxy surveys VIPERS, de la Torre et al 2013 Thick line: GR gravity Dahed or dotted lines Modified gravity DGP (Dvali et al 2010 f(r) models, etc.. 13

Tension between Planck, Cepheids, BAO BAO at 68 and 95% confidence level (blue) Ho (Cepheids) = 74km/s/Mpc, while Planck favors 67 km/s/mpc Planck Delubac et al 2014 14

Independent cosmology probes Hubble constant measured through cosmic distance ladder 73.8 ± 2.4 km/s/mpc (Riess et al 2011) 3% precision Tension with Planck = 67.3 ± 2.5 km/s/mpc 600 Cepheids in NIR, including hosts of SNIa, with WFC3 on HST Also host NGC 4258 (Dist known with H 2 O masers) Type Ia supernova SNLS (Conley et al 2011, Sullivan et al 2011) 5-yr survey: 500 new SNIa spectra and light-curves 0.2 < z < 1.0 Imaging with CFHT-Megacam, Spectra with 8_10 m Keck-VLT 15

Accelerating universe from SNIa 2003-2008 SNLS survey, French-Canadian collaboration Sullivan et al 2011 Conley et al 2011 Assuming flat universe 16

CMB Lensing tool 17

CMB lensing Measure of the curvature Constraint Amplitude s8 Correlation with LSS along the line of sight Planck Coll paper XVII (2013) 18

CMB polarisation: E-mode and B-mode Planck: E-mode, stack of 10 4 hot and cold spots In perfect agreement With LCDM First detection of B-mode BICEP2 March 2014 19

Comparison with previous data Detection at the level of r=0.2 Ratio tensor/scalar, signature of gravitational wave in inflation Higher than the upper limit from Planck 20

Strong Lensing 21

Will become an industry Substructure study; high-z normal galaxies Dark matter studies Similar number per unit surface with SKA 100 000 22

ISW Integrated Sachs-Wolf Energy loss by CMB photons while crossing evolving over-densities Amplitude of the effect: information on the amount of DE also growth of structures, and modifications of GR 23

Correlation CMB-LSS (NVSS, SDSS) Detected at 2.5s with Planck Stacking 50 voids, 50 super-clusters NVSS radio sources+cmb lensing +CMB Maps of the ISW: Blue= over-densities Red= under-densities 24

Growth rate as test of gravity Growth rate g = dlog (d) /dlog (a) Growth produces peculiar motions RSD The growth-rate will be measured through 1- Weak Lensing (WL) Tomography 2- Clustering redshift-space distortions (RSD) 25

Euclid redbook, predictions Majerotto et al 2012 26

Exploration of DE models with Euclid (redshifts only no WL data) 27

EUCLID Legacy Wide survey 15 000 deg 2 Deep survey 40 deg 2 (+2mag) 12 billion sources (3s) 50 million redshifts A reservoir of targets for JWST,GAIA, ELT ALMA, Subaru, VLT, etc. 28

Comparison with other surveys 29

Other domains: Galaxy evolution Most papers could come from outside the Core Science 30

Main issues, synergies: JWST, ELT, SKA Galaxy formation and evolution, physics and dynamics Surveys of galaxies at high and intermediate redshifts Mass assembly and star formation, mergers, cold accretion Quenching: supernovae and AGN feedback Epoch of reionization Early galaxies and black holes z=10-6 Absorption in front of QSO, GRB IGM AGN and super-massive BH Symbiotic growth with galaxies Physics of accretion 31

Are galaxies at z=7-10 able to re-ionize? Nbre of galaxies mag -1 Mpc -3 32

Galaxy formation and evolution How galaxies assemble their mass? How much mass assembled in mergers? How much through gas accretion and secular evolution? Star formation modes; main sequence, Starburst, mergers? Modes of Quenching SF and AGN feedback M82 33

How the Hubble sequence sets in? Galaxies today In the first half of the Universe age 34

When star formation declines, the Hubble sequence sets in Fraction of disks which have settled i.e. V/s > 3 Size of galaxies, Newman +2012 Kassin +2013 35

The main questions When does the Hubble sequence turn on? More perturbed systems at high redshift Disks appear thick, or dispersion dominated Clumpy galaxies? Or transient stages after mergers? The Elliptical galaxies appears surprisingly early Downsizing? Anto-hierarchical When and where most of the stars formed? Mass assembly: how and when? Environment effects AGN and bulge growths CenA 36

Mission implementation Thales Alenia Space begins construction in 2013 Payload Module: Astrium Airbus Defense and Space 37

Euclid Concept 38

EUCLID mission: launch in 2020 39

EUCLID: scientific instruments, VIS, NISP 40

Simulation with VIS instrument 41

Euclid simulation VIS+NISP YJH image z~0.3 cluster of galaxies 42

Ground base data for photo-z South o DES data deep enough in g,r,i,z. Suits Euclid needs o Part of south with LSST? North: o MegaCam-RED at CFHT + WHT (WEAVE survey) o HSC/Subaru o LSST south-north? 43

Ground spectroscopy in synergy HI spectroscopy will provide spectro-z catalogs for Euclid Ultimately 1 billion HI spectro-z (SKA2) With SKA-1 ~ 10% of SKA2 MOONS is ideal to provide the control sample for Euclid Euclid is ideal to provide deep near-ir photometry for MOONS In addition to the ground photo-z Survey, with CFHT in the North DES, LSST in the South E-ELT: very small FOV Will make follow-up of SKA and Euclid sources, with high resolution Complementary in science goals 44

45

Summary The Euclid mission is now in implementation phase Euclid = 5 cosmological probes: WL, RSD, BAO, CL, ISW with 2 independent methods: geometry and growth rate Europe is leading one of the most fascinating and challenging question of modern physics and cosmology Euclid Legacy = 12 billion sources, 50 million redshifts A mine of images and spectra for the community for several decades; Synergy with LSST, e-rosita, SKA A reservoir of targets for JWST, GAIA, VLT, E-ELT, TMT, ALMA, etc.. 46