Drainage Area: GL, VPU: 04 - Release Notes. 12/01/2018 Updated and New Data

Similar documents
Within this document, the term NHDPlus is used when referring to NHDPlus Version 2.1 (unless otherwise noted).

Hydrography Webinar Series

Designing a Dam for Blockhouse Ranch. Haley Born

GRAPEVINE LAKE MODELING & WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS

GIS in Water Resources Exercise #4 Solution Prepared by Irene Garousi-Nejad and David Tarboton

Exercise 4. Watershed and Stream Network Delineation

Introducing Iowa StreamStats Version 4, a Redesign of the USGS Application for Estimating Streamflow Stats

Stream Correction for Local Government GIS

Watershed and Stream Network Delineation

USGS Hydrography Overview. May 9, 2018

Preparing a NFIE-Geo Database for Travis County

What s New in Topographic Information - USGS National Map

Watershed Delineation

3D Elevation Program- Status and Updates. Oklahoma GI Council Meeting November 2, 2018 Claire DeVaughan US Geological Survey

Exercise 4. Watershed and Stream Network Delineation

software, just as word processors or databases are. GIS was originally developed and cartographic capabilities have been augmented by analysis tools.

Exercise 4. Watershed and Stream Network Delineation

ArcHYDRO: GIS for Water Resources

GIS in Water Resources Exercise #4 Solution

Exercise 4. Watershed and Stream Network Delineation

Delineation of Watersheds

Base Level Engineering FEMA Region 6

Exercise 4. Watershed and Stream Network Delineation

The National Hydrography Dataset in the Pacific Region. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey

A GIS-based Approach to Watershed Analysis in Texas Author: Allison Guettner

Lecture 3. Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources

LiDAR APPLICATIONS REMS6090. Assignment 2 HYDROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS of LiDAR DATA Due Date April 8, Venessa Bennett W

USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) and NHDPlus

What's New with NHDPlus (Classic)?

Leveraging LiDAR for Statewide NHD Hydrography Projects. Susan Phelps, CFM, GISP

Great Lakes Update. Volume 194: 2015 Annual Summary

Rick Faber CE 513 Watershed and Streamwork Delineation Lab # 3 4/24/2006

A Simple Drainage Enforcement Procedure for Estimating Catchment Area Using DEM Data

Great Lakes Update. Volume 188: 2012 Annual Summary

Exercise 5 - Watershed and Stream Network Delineation from DEMs GIS in Water Resources Fall 2014

Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks. Steve Kopp

Great Lakes Update. Volume 199: 2017 Annual Summary. Background

Submitted to. Prepared by

International Geospatial Harmonization of Sister Datasets Hydrography and Watershed Boundaries between Canada and the U.S.A

NWT Open Report Delineation of Watersheds in the Mackenzie Mountains

StreamStats: Delivering Streamflow Information to the Public. By Kernell Ries

GIS in Water Resources Midterm Exam Fall 2008 There are 4 questions on this exam. Please do all 4.

Workshop: Build a Basic HEC-HMS Model from Scratch

Development and Land Use Change in the Central Potomac River Watershed. Rebecca Posa. GIS for Water Resources, Fall 2014 University of Texas

Creating Watersheds from a DEM

INTRODUCTION TO HEC-HMS

Watershed Analysis of the Blue Ridge Mountains in Northwestern Virginia

CE 394K/CEE6440 GIS in Water Resources Fall 2018 Final Exam Solution

Hydrologically Consistent Pruning of the High- Resolution National Hydrography Dataset to 1:24,000-scale

Valenciano Reservoir Safe Yield Study. Prepared by: CSA Architects & Engineers, LLP

Using ArcGIS for Hydrology and Watershed Analysis:

MODULE 7 LECTURE NOTES 5 DRAINAGE PATTERN AND CATCHMENT AREA DELINEATION

Using the Stock Hydrology Tools in ArcGIS

Hydrology and Watershed Analysis

Great Lakes Update. Volume 191: 2014 January through June Summary. Vol. 191 Great Lakes Update August 2014

Streams in the Ranching Country of South Texas

HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES EVALUATIONS FOR SG. LUI WATERSHED

June 2018 WORKSHOP SECTION 2 MANUAL: RUNNING PTMAPP-DESKTOP AN INNOVATIVE SOLUTION BY:

GIS in Water Resources Midterm Exam Fall 2016 There are four questions on this exam. Please do all four. They are not all of equal weight.

George Mason University Department of Civil, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering

Lidar-derived Hydrography as a Source for the National Hydrography Dataset

Watershed Delineation in GIS Environment Rasheed Saleem Abed Lecturer, Remote Sensing Centre, University of Mosul, Iraq

Application of Geographical Information System (GIS) tools in watershed analysis

Creating Watersheds from a DEM in ArcGIS 9.x

13 Watershed Delineation & Modeling

GIS feature extraction tools in diverse landscapes

4. GIS Implementation of the TxDOT Hydrology Extensions

National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Update Project for US Forest Service Region 3

Digital Elevation Models. Using elevation data in raster format in a GIS

Improvement of the National Hydrography Dataset for Parts of the Lower Colorado Region and Additional Areas of Importance to the DLCC

How to Create Stream Networks using DEM and TauDEM

JJ Munoz. Explanation of the Project/Outline

Great Lakes Update. Great Lakes Winter and Spring Summary January June Vol. 187 Great Lakes Update August 2012

Lab 7: Cell, Neighborhood, and Zonal Statistics

USING GIS TO MODEL AND ANALYZE HISTORICAL FLOODING OF THE GUADALUPE RIVER NEAR NEW BRAUNFELS, TEXAS

NATIONAL HYDROGRAPHY DATASET (NHD) UPDATE PROJECT FOR US FOREST SERVICE REGION 3

Ed Tomlinson, PhD Bill Kappel Applied Weather Associates LLC. Tye Parzybok Metstat Inc. Bryan Rappolt Genesis Weather Solutions LLC

ASFPM - Rapid Floodplain Mapping

Great Lakes Update. Background

Appendix D. Model Setup, Calibration, and Validation

CE 394K.3 GIS in Water Resources Midterm Quiz Fall There are 5 questions on this exam. Please do all 5. They are of equal credit.

Watershed Modeling Orange County Hydrology Using GIS Data

Version No. Release Date PTMApp-Desktop Tool Affected and Summary of Modifications User Implications

Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analyses Using ArcGIS

Pompton Lakes Dam Downstream Effects of the Floodgate Facility. Joseph Ruggeri Brian Cahill Michael Mak Andy Bonner

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

Influence of spatial variation in precipitation on artificial neural network rainfall-runoff model

Accuracy assessment of Pennsylvania streams mapped using LiDAR elevation data: Method development and results

Surface Processes Focus on Mass Wasting (Chapter 10)

Indiana GIS Local Resolution NHD Applications. Indiana State GIS Conference

Improvement of the National Hydrography Dataset for US Forest Service Region 3 in Cooperation with the National Forest Service

SWAMP GIS: A spatial decision support system for predicting and treating stormwater runoff. Michael G. Wing 1 * and Derek Godwin

Development of GIS Tools to Optimize Identification of Road Segments Prone to Flood Damage

Altered Watercourse Determination Methodology. Final Revision (8)

CENTRAL TEXAS HILL COUNTRY FLOOD

Section 4: Model Development and Application

Watershed Modeling With DEMs

Flood Map. National Dataset User Guide

Great Lakes Update. Volume 193: 2015 January through June Summary. Vol. 193 Great Lakes Update August 2015

Assessment of a Rapid Approach for Estimating Catchment Areas for Surface Drainage Lines

Transcription:

Drainage Area: GL, VPU: 04 - Release Notes 12/01/2018 Updated and New Data Time of Travel and Related Attributes: The new and updated data is included in new versions of the NHDPlusAttributes and EROMExtension components. Specifically, EROM mean annual and mean monthly statistics have been re-computed with the following changes: Removal of upper and lower limits for reference gage regression adjustment, Correction of reference gage regression equation, and Reference gage regression included in all flow statistics. PlusFlowlineLakeMorphology and PlusWaterbodyLakeMorphology tables have been updated based on the new EROM mean annual flows. PlusFlowlineVAA mean annual time of travel (TOTMA) has been updated based on the new EROM mean annual flows. Path time (PathTime) attribute has been added and populated based on the updated TOTMA values. 09/21/2017 Updated Components The NHDPlusAttributes has been updated. Various VAAs in PlusFlowlineVAA for Coastline features have been standardized. 09/06/2016 EROM Component Updated VPU 04 (Great Lakes). 165 Flowlines did not properly use the Supercatchments, which resulted in significant under estimation of flows and drainage areas on these flowlines. The flowlines are on the Detroit, Saint Claire, Niagara, and Saint Lawrence Rivers. 05/10/2016 Updated Components The improved HUC12 downstream pointers from the February 2016 WBD Version were updated in the NHDPlus WBDSnapshot. When a correspondence between the two versions could be determined for both the HUC12 and the downstream HUC12, the downstream pointer was updated. 01/05/2016 Updated Components EROM Mean Annual and Mean Monthly flow estimates have been re-run to correct incremental flows to be the sum of the incremental flows upstream and on the flowline. EROM velocities were updated to provide velocity estimate only for flowing waters. EROM velocities are now set to -9998 (missing value) in all water bodies except swamp/marsh. Cumulative drainage areas in NHDPlusAttribute component tables have been corrected to include the super catchments in VPU04 07082015 Updated Components

The WBDSnapshot was revised to correct the values in the Acres field. The NHDSnapshot and NHDPlusAttributes were revised to correct values in FType/FCode in a handful of features. 1/30/2015 Revised Component The VPUAttributeExtension has been updated to include accumulated mean annual and mean monthly runoff files. 04/02/2014 Replacement components Six components have been replaced with new versions: NHDPlusCatchment, NHDPlusAttributes, NHDPlusBurnComponents, VPUAttributeExtension, EROMExtension, and VogelExtension. A single bad catchment was discovered. This catchment should include drainage from Canada. After adding the Canadian portion to the catchment, the changes rippled through catchment attributes, cumulative attributes, and flow estimates, among others. In addition to the catchment-related changes, a number of additional cumulative attributes have been added to the VPUAttributeExtension component. 02/12/2014 Replacement components Four components have been replaced with new version: NHDPlusAttributes, VPUAttributeExtension, EROMExtension, and VogelExtension. These components changed due to the implementation of the super catchments into the cumulative drainage computations. 1/21/2014 New Data Release The EROMExtension was enhanced to include mean monthly flow estimates. See NHDPlusV2 User Guide for additional information. 12/07/2012 Replacement components Three NHDPlusV2 components are replaced with new versions: NHDSnapshot, NHDPlusBurnComponents, and NHDPlusAttributes. These replacements represent some changes in NHDFlowline ReachCode values and the inclusion of an NHDReachCrossReference table that tracks ReachCode changes from NHDPlusV1 to NHDPlusV2. 9/26/2012 Temporary Attribute Cleanup During NHDPlusV2 processing and subsequent QAQC, some temporary attributes were added. Some of these attributes were not deleted and were inadvertently included in the public release. These extraneous attributes do not affect the usability of the data, but they do violate the official data model and may cause issues with future NHDPlusV2 tools. Users are encouraged to download the new components. In this VPU, the replacement zip files are: NHDPlusV21_GL_04_NHDSnapshot_05.7z NHDPlusV21_GL_04_WBDSnapshot_04.7z NHDPlusV21_GL_04_NHDPlusCatchment_04.7z NHDPlusV21_GL_04_NHDPlusBurnComponents_05.7z 9/19/2012 NHDPlusV21_MS_10L_10b_Catseed_02.7z

Wrong grid in package replaced with correct grid. 9/13/2012 Update to VPUAttributeExtension Component An error was discovered in the ArcGIS->Spatial Analyst->Zonal-Statistics-as-Table geoprocessing tool. The error created incorrect results in the catchment allocation and accumulation tables in the VPUAttributeExtension folder. After implementing a work-around, the tables were recreated and are posted as NHDPlusV21_GL_04_VPUAttributeExtension_04.7z. 6/1/2012 - Initial Release Notes NHD Edits Region 04 received the standard set of edits described in the NHDPlusV2 User Guide. In addition, artificial paths in the rivers that connect the Great Lakes were edited/added to ensure that the lakes are connected. Special handling of Great Lake grid cells and the LandSea Polygon Region 4 is unique, in that it is the only hydro region with flowlines coded as FType = Coastline that do not represent features that define an oceanic shoreline. These coastline features define the shoreline of the Great Lakes. This data condition creates some challenges with the NHDPlus BuildRefresh production process, in particular, the HydroDem cell values for the lakes themselves. To simplify the handling of this scenario, it was decided to impose NoData values for the open surface water cells of the Great Lakes. These Nodata cells values are also reflected in the NHDPlus HydroDem derivative products, fdr and fac. Related to this topic of interior coastlines, the NHDPlus BuildRefresh production software is designed to enforce a uniform vertical drop distance for cells representing ocean areas in the LandSea Polygon. This enforcement is done when NHD flowline features coded as FType = Coastline are detected by the software for the RPU/VPU being processed. In this scenario, the software expects at least one ocean polygon and one land polygon in the NHDPlus LandSea feature class. This special handling of ocean areas is not applicable for the Great Lakes as the open water area is intended to be NoData. Therefore, to avoid issues with the software two triangular shaped polygons for each RPU area were created in the LandSea polygon for Region 4 to enable the software to function correctly. Within each RPU, the LandSea feature class has one ocean polygon placed in a Great Lake, and one land polygon. Sinks placed in empty HUCs Being the first hydro region to enter NHDPlus production, data condition rules had not yet been standardized. This affected a decision made in region 4, for HUC 12s not classified as Closed Basin in the WBD that did not have NHDFlowlines within these areas (termed an empty huc ). Empty HUCs left as a closed system in the Wall feature class in the DEM hydro-conditioning process, would fill up to one elevation, until it spills over to the lowest elevation of the surrounding HUCs. The filling of an empty HUC is undesirable as it removes the DEM topography within the HUC and the assignment of its area to a surrounding HUC may also be in error.

At the time of production for region 4, the action to alleviate this filling of an empty HUC was to identify a surface water feature to add to the BurnAddLine feature class to breach a wall feature so that the area in the HUC 12 did not fill up erroneously, and to ensure the proper drainage. In some cases, no surface water connection could be identified from a topographic map or aerial photo. Therefore, an assumption was made that because no surface water feature could be identified, those empty HUCs would get a sink(s) placed within them, which in essence creates a closed system. This was done in Region 4 for 3 empty HUC 12s and includes: 040601050401; 040700070201; and 040700070401. Catchment/Burn Settings The following describes unique settings of Burn and Catchment properties in BurnLineEvent. 1) Flowline ComID 11946403 is a pipeline feature that delivers water to a hydro-electric turbine down gradient of a reservoir. The pipeline is set to N for the Burn and Catch fields in BurnLineEvent. Eighty percent of the outflow of this reservoir travels through the pipeline on an annual basis. Twenty percent of the outflow travels over the dam spillway into the natural drainage path. These divergence fractions are included in the NHDPlus DivfracMP.dbf. 2) Several locations along the Erie Canal in New York are elevated above the surrounding terrain. Streams that intersect the canal here are culverted under the canal.the catchment and burn properties have been set to N (no) for the flowlines representing these elevated canal sections 3) Flowline ComID 904130023 is a pipeline culvert feature under an airport runway. To ensure upstream connectivity in the fdr/fac grids, but not have a catchment generated; this flowline was set to Y for burn and N for catchment. 4) At the edge of the VPU, conflict flowlines with the WBD region boundary have been set to N for catchment and burn. Super Catchments A dataset known as Supercatchments was developed to enable representing the entire cumulative drainage areas above the rivers that drain four of the Great Lakes, i.e. the St. Mary s River which drains Lake Superior, the St. Clair River, which drains Lake Huron, the Niagara River, which drains Lake Erie, and the St. Lawrence River, which drains Lake Ontario. The supercatchments were composed from the outer catchment boundaries on the U.S. side, combined with boundaries of hydrologic units for the Canadian side. Most of the Canadian boundaries came from the NHN Index, Edition 5.0, downloaded from this web site: http://www.geobase.ca/geobase/en/data/nhn/national-index.html In one area the NHN Index conflicted with the Canadian Fundamental Drainage Areas (FDA) from the http://www.geogratis.gc.ca/geogratis/en/index.html web site. The FDA dataset was used for the boundary in that area instead of the NHN Index. Canadian NHN Hydro

The Canadian NHN hydrography datasets were downloaded from http://www.geobase.ca/geobase/en/data/nhn/index.html for areas that drain to NHDPlus flowlines, but not for the areas that drain to the Great Lakes themselves. These lines were used in the BurnAddLine feature class to condition the HydroDEM in those areas. WBD HUC Coding In the WBD, HUC4s 0111 and 0201 have been re-coded to 0415. The NHDPlusV2 processing for these re-coded areas was already underway when the changes were detected and, given the timing, it was not feasible to re-process those areas or to physically move data from one NHDPlusV2 workspace to another. However, the NHD snapshot Reachcodes on both NHDFlowline and NHDWaterbody features were adjusted to reflect the HUC8 codes in the 2/1/2012 version of WBD. This means that the NHDPlusV2 workspaces for regions 01 and 02 contain some NHDFlowline and NHDWaterbody features will have reachcodes that begin with 0415. If and when NHDPlusV2 is reprocessed for regions 01, 02, and 04, these issues will be addressed. EROM See Appendix A of the NHDPlus V2 User Guide for a detailed explanation of the EROM parameters. EROM Flow and Velocity estimates are mean annual values. The time period for these estimates is 1971 to 2000; the runoff, temperature and precipitation grids are for this time period. For gage adjustment and Reference Gage Regression, gages must meet the following criteria: 1. A minimum of 20 of the 30 years (1971 to 2000) of complete flow records. 2. Gage versus NHDPlus drainage areas must be within 0.2 (+/- 20%) Upstream gage drainage area proportion is 0.5 (50%) Excess Evapotranspiration default coefficients are 0.3 and 0.5. Gage sequestration proportion is 0.2 (20%) Because of greatly increased QAQC errors in the Excess Evapotransipiration step, this step is not run in the following VPUs: 09, 10U, 17, 12. The reasons for this problem are under investigation.