ENAE 483/788D MIDTERM FALL, 2018 NAME: a 3 = a = 42970] 1. So after one sol, the subspacecraft point would have gone 88773

Similar documents
ENAE 483/788D FINAL EXAMINATION FALL, 2015

ENAE 483/788D MIDTERM FALL, 2015 NAME:

Parametric Design MARYLAND. The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I Design Example: Project Diana U N I V E R S I T Y O F.

The Design Process Level I Design Example: Low-Cost Lunar Exploration Amplification on Initial Concept Review

Parametric Design MARYLAND. The Design Process Level I Design Example: Low-Cost Lunar Exploration U N I V E R S I T Y O F

12.3 Exploring Space: Past, Present and Future

MARYLAND. The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I Design Example: UMd Exploration Initiative U N I V E R S I T Y O F.

MIKE HAWES VICE PRESIDENT & ORION PROGRAM MANAGER

Flight and Orbital Mechanics. Exams

Robotic Mobility Above the Surface

ENAE 791 Course Overview

Interplanetary Spacecraft. Team 12. Alliance: Foxtrot

Basic Ascent Performance Analyses

Mass Estimating Relationships MARYLAND. Review of iterative design approach Mass Estimating Relationships (MERs) Sample vehicle design analysis

4.8 Space Research and Exploration. Getting Into Space

Mission to Mars. MAE 598: Design Optimization Final Project. By: Trevor Slawson, Jenna Lynch, Adrian Maranon, and Matt Catlett

The Path to Mars. December Matthew Duggan. Copyright 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Congreve Rockets This rockets were invented by Englishman, Sir William Congreve. Congreve successfully demonstrated a solid fuel rocket in 1805, and

Guidance Strategy for Hyperbolic Rendezvous

LAB 2 HOMEWORK: ENTRY, DESCENT AND LANDING

Electrically Propelled Cargo Spacecraft for Sustained Lunar Supply Operations

Satellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers. Dr Ugur GUVEN

How Small Can a Launch Vehicle Be?

Thank you for your purchase!

Problem A: Solar Sailing to Mars

Preface. 2 Cable space accelerator 39

1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded

Robotic Mobility Above the Surface

Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. & L Garde Inc.

Expanding opportunities for lunar gravity capture

PROBLEM SCORE Problem 1 (30 Pts) Problem 2 (30 Pts) Choose Problem #2 or #3! Problem 4 (40 Pts) TOTAL (100 Pts)

A Comparison of Low Cost Transfer Orbits from GEO to LLO for a Lunar CubeSat Mission

ATTITUDE CONTROL MECHANIZATION TO DE-ORBIT SATELLITES USING SOLAR SAILS

Course Overview/Orbital Mechanics

Lunar Orbit Propellant Transfer

Astrodynamics of Moving Asteroids

9.2 Worksheet #3 - Circular and Satellite Motion

Space Travel on a Shoestring: CubeSat Beyond LEO

Toward the Final Frontier of Manned Space Flight

The Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) Mission Design: A Pegasus Class Mission to a High Energy Orbit

PSI AP Physics 1 Gravitation

ESSE Payload Design. 1.2 Introduction to Space Missions

General Remarks and Instructions

MARS DROP. Matthew A. Eby Mechanical Systems Department. Vehicle Systems Division/ETG The Aerospace Corporation May 25, 2013

Rocket Performance MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Ballistic Entry ENAE Launch and Entry Vehicle Design

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Seven Steps of Systems Engineering (horizontal axis of Activity Matrix)

Rocket Science 102 : Energy Analysis, Available vs Required

RAPID GEOSYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER ORBIT ASCENT PLAN GENERATION. Daniel X. Junker (1) Phone: ,

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Formation Flying and Rendezvous and Docking Simulator for Exploration Missions (FAMOS-V2)

Lunar Flashlight Project

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

IAC-13,C4,P,44.p1,x17254 THE DYNAMIC OPERATON OF A HIGH Q EMDRIVE MICROWAVE THRUSTER. Roger Shawyer C.Eng. MIET. FRAeS. SPR Ltd UK

Gravitational Potential Energy and Total Energy *

A Notional Round Trip To The Trans-Lunar Libration Point (EML2)

Technology and Space Exploration

Project of Lithuanian Nano-Satellite

Toward Venus orbit insertion of Akatsuki

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

The Role of the Cis-Lunar Libration Point in Lunar Operations

Circular Motion & Gravitation FR Practice Problems

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30.

AAE 251 Formulas. Standard Atmosphere. Compiled Fall 2016 by Nicholas D. Turo-Shields, student at Purdue University. Gradient Layer.

/////// ///////////// Module ONE /////////////// ///////// Space

Engineering Sciences and Technology. Trip to Mars

LOFAR on the Moon: Mission Configuration and Orbit Design

Traveling Into Space. Use Target Reading Skills. How Do Rockets Work? Building Vocabulary

Power, Propulsion, and Thermal Preliminary Design Review James Black Matt Marcus Grant McLaughlin Michelle Sultzman

Propulsion Systems Design MARYLAND. Rocket engine basics Survey of the technologies Propellant feed systems Propulsion systems design

Gravitational Fields Review

LOW-COST LUNAR COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION

GEOL212 Due 9/24/18 Homework 4

Proton Launch System Mission Planner s Guide SECTION 2. LV Performance

Conceptual Physical Science 6 th Edition

LAUNCH OPTIONS FOR MARS NETWORK MISSIONS USING SMALL SPACECRAFT. Walter K Daniel'

JUpiter Icy Moons Explorer (JUICE) Status report for OPAG. N. Altobelli (on behalf of O. Witasse) JUICE artist impression (Credits ESA, AOES)

Deimos and Phobos as Destinations for Human Exploration

HEOMD Overview March 16, 2015

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Technology of Rocket

Astromechanics. 6. Changing Orbits

Astronomy 110 Section 1 2 / 01/ Extra Credit

SPACE DEBRIS REMOVAL

Overview of China Chang'e-3 Mission and Development of Follow-on Mission

Rocket Science, Reentry and the Race to Mars. From Science Fiction to Simulation

Space mission environments: sources for loading and structural requirements

Supporting Video:

Q3.1. A. 100 m B. 200 m C. 600 m D m E. zero. 500 m. 400 m. 300 m Pearson Education, Inc.

Space Notes 3B. Covers objectives 5, 10, and 11

LRO Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter

EVALUATION OF A SPACECRAFT TRAJECTORY DEVIATION DUE TO THE LUNAR ALBEDO

AP Physics C Summer Assignment Kinematics

ASTRIUM. Interplanetary Path Early Design Tools at ASTRIUM Space Transportation. Nathalie DELATTRE ASTRIUM Space Transportation.

Supplemental Questions 12U

Applied Thermodynamics - II

a. The imaginary line that passes through Earth at the N and S poles is

Physics 201 Quiz 1. Jan 14, 2013

Transcription:

ENAE 483/788D MIDTERM FALL, 208 NAME: One 8.5 x piece of paper allowed for notes (both sides). No Internet-enabled devices allowed. Put your name on the cover page, and on each page if you disassemble the quiz package. Please write neatly, and put boxes around your answers. Every question or subquestion is worth 5 points. Some possibly useful numbers: µ Earth = 398, 604 3 2, r Earth = 6378, µ Mars = 42, 970 3 2, r Mars = 3393 µ Moon = 4667.9 3 2, r Moon = 738 () We would like to consider the possibility of using an areosynchronous orbit - that is, a circular orbit that would remain above a single point on Mars equator. The length of a Mars day is 24h39m33s. (a) What is the radius of this orbit? P = 2π P = a = a 3 µ Mars = a = [ (88, 773 2π ) 2 42970] 3 [ ( ) P 2 3 µ Mars] 2π = 20,470 (b) If you inserted into a circular orbit which was one too high, how far would you have to move along the equator to keep the spacecraft directly overhead after one sol? In which direction? a P = 2π 3 2047 3 = 2π = 88, 778 µ Mars 42970 So after one sol, the subspacecraft point would have gone 88773 88778 = 99.9943% of the way around, so it would be ( 2πr Mars 88773 ) =.22 West of the original starting point 88778 (2) It was decided instead that the initial parking orbit would be circular with an altitude of 7,000. You would like to perform a Hohmann transfer from this orbit to the orbit of Phobos (r P hobos = 9376 ). (a) If you are using a low-thrust stage to do this maneuver, what is the v required? r parking = h parking + r Mars = 7000 + 3393 = 20, 393 v = v c,p hobos v c,parking = µmars µmars r P hobos = 42970 42970 9376 20393 r parking = 0.6892 (b) If you use a high-thrust stage to do a transfer from your initial orbital radius to Phobos orbit, what v will this require? µmars 42970 v c,parking = = =.452 r parking 20393

2 ENAE 483/788D MIDTERM FALL, 208 NAME: 2r P hobos 2 9376 v a = v c,parking =.452 r P hobos + r parking 9376 + 20393 =.52 v = v c,parking v a =.452.52 = 0.2999 µmars 42970 v c,p hobos = r P hobos = = 2.4 9376 2r parking 2 20393 v p = v c,p hobos =.353 = 2.506 r parking + r P hobos 20393 + 9376 v 2 = v a v c,p hobos =.622.353 = 0.3650 v total = v + v 2 = 0.2999 + 0.3650 = 0.6649 (3) You need to design a system to bring a payload consisting of a 5000 kg crew module from low lunar orbit (LLO) to a landing on the lunar surface (LS), and return it to LLO. v landing = 2706 m/, v launch = 2334 m/, I sp = 445, δ = 0. for all vehicles (a) We will start with expendable stages for landing and launch. Calculate m o, m in, and m prop for the stage to launch the payload from the lunar surface back into lunar orbit. r ascent = e v launch gisp = e 2334 = 0.5856 λ ascent = r ascent δ = 0.5856 0. = 0.4856 m o = m P L = 5000 = 0,298 kg λ ascent 0.4856 m in = δm o = 0.(0298) = 030 kg m prop = m o ( r ascent = 0298( 0.5856) = 4267 kg (b) Calculate m o, m in, and m prop for the stage to land both the payload and the fully fueled ascent stage on the lunar surface r descent = e v landing gisp = e 2706 = 0.5377 λ descent = r descent δ = 0.5377 0. = 0.4377 m o = m P L = 0298 = 23,529 kg λ descent 0.4377 m in = δm o = 0.(23529) = 2353 kg m prop = m o ( r descent = 23529( 0.5377) = 0,877 kg

ENAE 483/788D MIDTERM FALL, 208 NAME: 3 (c) Alternately, we would like to consider a reusable vehicle which both lands and launches from the lunar surface. Carrying the same 5000 kg payload both ways, calculate m o, m in, and m prop for this reusable propulsion stage. v total = v landing + v launch = 2334 + 2706 = 5040 m/ r round trip = e v total gisp = e 5040 = 0.348 λ total = r round trip δ = 0.348 0. = 0.248 m o = m P L = 5000 = 23,273 kg λ total 0.248 m in = δm o = 0.(23273) = 2327 kg m prop = m o ( r round trip ) = 23273( 0.348) = 5,947 kg (d) There will be times we want to land payload (like, say, a habitat or rover) on the lunar surface which does not return to orbit. Calculate the maximum payload the vehicle you designed in (3)(c) can carry to the lunar surface if it ascends with no payload. To launch empty from the moon back to LLO, you only have inert and propellant masses. r ascent = m in m in + m pr,ascent = m pr,ascent = r ascent m in = 0.5856 2327 = 647 kg r ascent 0.5856 r descent = m P L + m in + m pr,ascent = m P L = r descent m pr m pr,asc m in m P L + m in + m pr r descent r descent m P L = 0.5377 0.5377 5947 649 2353 = 2,628 kg 0.5377 (4) You need to evaluate the safety of using long-range rovers on the Moon. (a) Assume the rover has a 0.9999 reliability for each it travels. Find the MKBF (Mean Kilometers Between Failures) for the rover. [Hint: it s where your chance of still being functional is /e.] e = RMKBF = MKBF = ln R = = 9999.5 ln 0.9999 (b) If you have a requirement of 0.999 chance of crew survival, how far can you allow the rover to drive? P = e d MKBF = d = lnp MKBF = ln0.9999999.5 = 0.00 (c) Let s assume you have two rovers, and either can successfully bring the entire crew back. What is the required reliability for each rover to have an aggregate total reliability of 0.999? R = ( P ) 2 = P = R = 0.00 = 0.9684

4 ENAE 483/788D MIDTERM FALL, 208 NAME: (d) Given your answer to (4)(c), how far can you let the rovers drive now before your crew risk exceeds the allowed 0.999? d = lnp MKBF = ln0.96849999.5 = 32.3 (e) You plan to have three rovers on the Moon, with at least one required to ensure crew survival under all conditions. If each rover is 90% reliable, what is the probability of loss of crew? P (3 operational) = R 3 = 0.9 3 = 0.7290 P (2 operational) = 3R 2 ( R) = 3(0.9 2 )( 0.9) = 0.2430 P ( operational) = 3R( R) 2 = 3(0.9)( 0.9) 2 = 0.0270 P (at least operational) = P (3 operational) + P (2 operational) + P ( operational) = 0.9990 (f) How does your answer to (4)(e) change if there is a 0% intercorrelation rate? P (3 operational) = R 3 = 0.9 3 = 0.7290 P (2 operational) = 3R 2 ( R)( f) = 3(0.9 2 )( 0.9)( 0.) = 0.287 P ( operational) = 3R( R) 2 ( f) 2 = 3(0.9)( 0.9) 2 ( 0.) 2 = 0.029 P (at least operational) = P (3 operational) + P (2 operational) + P ( operational) = 0.9696 (5) You need to estimate the cost for the crew module from question (3). According to Arney and Wilhite, the nonrecurring and first unit production costs of a crew module can be estimated by c NR < $M >= 285.57(m < kg >) 0.2667 ; c R < $M >= 49.923(m < kg >) 0.2409 (a) Calculate the nonrecurring cost of the crew module From question (3), the crew module (=payload) = 5000 kg c NR < $M >= 285.57(5000) 0.2667 = $2768M (b) Calculate the first unit production cost of the crew module c R < $M >= 49.923(5000) 0.2409 = $388.5M (c) Assuming a 78% learning curve, calculate the production costs for units 2 through 4 p = ln LC ln 2 = ln 0.78 ln 2 = 0.3585 c R = c R 2 p = 388.5(2 0.3585 ) = $303.0M c R3 = c R 3 p = 388.5(3 0.3585 ) = $265.0M c R4 = c R 4 p = 388.5(4 0.3585 ) = $236.4M (d) If you were selling the four crew modules to NASA, what price would you have to charge per module to make an overall 0% profit? c tot = c NR + c R + c R2 + c R3 + c R4 = 2768 + 388.5 + 303.0 + 265.0 + 236.4 = $3958M P rice =.c tot N =.(3958) = $088M/module 4

ENAE 483/788D MIDTERM FALL, 208 NAME: 5 (6) A solar sail is in low Earth orbit at an altitude of 300. The vehicle is a circular disk with a diameter of 300m, and is flying such that the surface of the disk is perpendicular to the velocity vector. The density of Earth s atmosphere at this altitude can be approximated by ρ = 3.875 0 9 e h<>/59.06 (in kg/m 3 ) (a) What is the drag force on the solar sail? ρ = 3.875 0 9 e h<>/59.06 = 3.875 0 9 e 300/59.06 = 2.4 0 kg/m 3 µ 398604 In circular orbit, v = r = = 7726 m/ 6378 + 300 As a flat plate perpendicular to the velocity vector, the drag coefficient c D =4. The area of the ship perpendicular to the velocity vector is ( ) 2, or 0 6 m 2. D = 2 ρv2 Ac D = 2 2.4 0 (7726) 2 ( 0 6 )4 = 2878 N (b) At this altitude, the flux for orbital debris impacts by particles of a centimeter in diameter is 0 5 hits/m 2 /year. How long, on average, could the solar sail stay in this orbit before it could expect to have an impact of this size? (F lux)(area) = 0 5 (6 0 6 ) = 60 hits/year = 0.0667 years/hit = 6.088 days