SHADOW - Main Result. windpro CUMULTATIEVE EFFECTEN SLAGSCHADUW HERENTALS. EDF Luminus Markiesstraat Brussel

Similar documents
windpro Palovaara_Ahkiovaara WTG Shadow receptor-input

GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

The Climate of Marshall County

The Climate of Payne County

The Climate of Kiowa County

Annual Average NYMEX Strip Comparison 7/03/2017

The Climate of Murray County

SASKATOON STATION

The Climate of Bryan County

The Climate of Texas County

The Climate of Pontotoc County

The Climate of Haskell County

The Climate of Seminole County

The Climate of Grady County

Algonquin Power Co. Shadow Flicker Impact Assessment. Amherst Island Wind Project. For. H Rev. 2 February 26, 2013

APPENDIX G-7 METEROLOGICAL DATA

13 SHADOW FLICKER Introduction Methodology

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

Verification & Certification Report (August 2009) For Power Generation

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

Site Description: Tower Site

Algonquin Power Co. Final Shadow Flicker Impact Assessment. Amherst Island Wind Project. For. H Rev. 3 November 28, 2013

5.0 WHAT IS THE FUTURE ( ) WEATHER EXPECTED TO BE?

Calculations Equation of Time. EQUATION OF TIME = apparent solar time - mean solar time

Yucca Mountain climate: Past, present, and future

Jayalath Ekanayake Jonas Tappolet Harald Gall Abraham Bernstein. Time variance and defect prediction in software projects: additional figures

Site Description: Tower Site

Lunar Eclipses:

Weather Station: WH_500_Series. Battery Voltage

DAILY QUESTIONS 28 TH JUNE 18 REASONING - CALENDAR

Drought in Southeast Colorado

SPECIMEN. Date Morning/Afternoon. A Level Geography H481/01 Physical systems Sample Question Paper. Time allowed: 1 hour 30 minutes PMT

In Centre, Online Classroom Live and Online Classroom Programme Prices

L11 Solar Control & Shading Masks 5/6/08

L11 Solar Control & Shading Masks 5/6/08

Time Series Model of Photovoltaic Generation for Distribution Planning Analysis. Jorge Valenzuela

Outline. The Path of the Sun. Emissivity and Absorptivity. Average Radiation Properties II. Average Radiation Properties

How to find Sun's GHA using TABLE How to find Sun's Declination using TABLE 4...4

CAMARGO RANCH, llc. CRAIG BUFORD BufordResources.com

Project No India Basin Shadow Study San Francisco, California, USA

Time Series Analysis

Mr. XYZ. Stock Market Trading and Investment Astrology Report. Report Duration: 12 months. Type: Both Stocks and Option. Date: Apr 12, 2011

Quantification of energy losses caused by blade icing and the development of an Icing Loss Climatology

Distributed Generation. Retail Distributed Generation

Agricultural Science Climatology Semester 2, Anne Green / Richard Thompson

ENGINE SERIAL NUMBERS

LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA Monthly Summary November 2006

Colorado PUC E-Filings System

UWM Field Station meteorological data

SHADOW FLICKER MODELING ANALYSIS

Winter Season Resource Adequacy Analysis Status Report

Final WIND DATA REPORT. Narragansett School District Templeton, Massachusetts

LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA Monthly Summary July 2013

Average 175, , , , , , ,046 YTD Total 1,098,649 1,509,593 1,868,795 1,418, ,169 1,977,225 2,065,321

Average 175, , , , , , ,940 YTD Total 944,460 1,284,944 1,635,177 1,183, ,954 1,744,134 1,565,640

Colorado PUC E-Filings System

2003 Water Year Wrap-Up and Look Ahead

SO2 observation at the summit of Mt. Fuji

Jackson County 2018 Weather Data 67 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

Hazard assessment based on radar-based rainfall nowcasts at European scale The HAREN project

WIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven

LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA Monthly Summary September 2016

u.s. Naval Observatory Astronomical Applications Department

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data

WIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven

UNCLASSIFIED. Environment, Safety and Health (ESH) Report

Record date Payment date PID element Non-PID element. 08 Sep Oct p p. 01 Dec Jan p 9.85p

Long-term Water Quality Monitoring in Estero Bay

Climate Change Impact Assessment on Indian Water Resources. Ashvin Gosain, Sandhya Rao, Debajit Basu Ray

SOUTH AFRICAN TIDE TABLES

LAB 3: THE SUN AND CLIMATE NAME: LAB PARTNER(S):

UV 428 UV 39 UV UV 60 UV 957

Climatography of the United States No

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

SOUTH AFRICAN TIDE TABLES

Appendix B. A proposition for updating the environmental standards using real Earth Albedo and Earth IR Flux for Spacecraft Thermal Analysis

Analysis of the Performance a PV System Based on Empirical Data in a Real World Context

WIND EFFECTS ON CHEMICAL SPILL IN ST ANDREW BAY SYSTEM

Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

Statistical Models for Rainfall with Applications to Index Insura

Increasing Transmission Capacities with Dynamic Monitoring Systems

Monthly Trading Report Trading Date: Dec Monthly Trading Report December 2017

REPORT ON LABOUR FORECASTING FOR CONSTRUCTION

Evaluation of the impact of atmospheric pressure loading modeling on GNSS data analysis

WindPRO version Jan 2011 Printed/Page :15 / 1. DECIBEL - Main Result. Calculation: Decibel_Min_layout_EIAR_KJ. WTGs.

Dates and Prices ICAEW - Manchester In Centre Programme Prices

Smoothed Prediction of the Onset of Tree Stem Radius Increase Based on Temperature Patterns

2003 Moisture Outlook

Power output: 6 750kW=4500kW Location: Top of Taikoyama, Kyoto prefecture, Japan. Terrain condition: Complex mountainous area

Basic human requirements

2016 Year-End Benchmark Oil and Gas Prices (Average of Previous 12 months First-Day-of-the Month [FDOM] Prices)

C L I M A T E R E S P O N S I V E U R B A N D E S I G N F O R G R E E K P U B L I C S P A C E

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY MILITARY SURFACE DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION COMMAND (SDDC) 1 SOLDIER WAY SCOTT AFB, IL 62225

Colorado s 2003 Moisture Outlook

Appendix I Shadow Flicker Report

Smalltalk 10/2/15. Dates. Brian Heinold

Florida Courts E-Filing Authority Board. Service Desk Report March 2019

Interannual variation of MODIS NDVI in Lake Taihu and its relation to climate in submerged macrophyte region

TILT, DAYLIGHT AND SEASONS WORKSHEET

CLIMATE OVERVIEW. Thunder Bay Climate Overview Page 1 of 5

Transcription:

SHADOW - Main Result Assumptions for shadow calculations Maximum distance for influence Calculate only when more than 20 % of sun is covered by the blade Please look in WTG table Minimum sun height over horizon for influence Day step for calculation Time step for calculation 3 1 days 1 minutes Sunshine probability S (Average daily sunshine hours) [UCCLE] Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1,73 3,04 3,77 5,42 6,72 6,47 6,55 6,53 5,25 3,96 2,43 1,56 Operational time N NNE ENE E ESE SSE S SSW WSW W WNW NNW Sum 261 393 465 559 645 475 572 869 1.140 1.059 606 326 7.370 Idle start wind speed: Cut in wind speed from power curve A ZVI (Zones of Visual Influence) calculation is performed before flicker calculation so non visible WTG do not contribute to calculated flicker values. A WTG will be visible if it is visible from any part of the receiver window. The ZVI calculation is based on the following assumptions: Height contours used: Height Contours: CONTOURLINE_ONLINEDATA_19.wpo (1) Obstacles used in calculation Eye height: 1,5 m Grid resolution: 1 m Topographic shadow included in calculation All coordinates are in Belgian Lambert72-BD72 (BE 2001 <±1m) Scale 1:20.000 Shadow receptor New WTG WTGs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 X Y Z Row data/description 181.978 182.369 181.851 182.308 182.895 184.217 184.563 205.416 205.299 204.974 204.566 204.774 205.481 205.378 1 1 1 10,9 15,5 13,7 2 WTG type Valid Manufact. Type-generator ENERCON E-92 2,3 MW 2300 92.0!-!...No ENERCON E-92 2,3 MW 2300 92.0!-!...No ENERCON ENERCON SWT-2.3-120- SWT-2.3-120- SWT-2.3-120- SWT-2.3-120- SWT-2.3-120- E-92 2,3 MW- E-92 2,3 MW- Power, rated [kw] Rotor diameter 12 12 12 12 12 9 9 Shadow data Hub Calculation RPM height distance [RPM] 9 9 8 8 8 108,4 1.516 16,0 108,4 1.516 16,0 Shadow receptor-input No. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P X Y Z 182.446 182.697 181.588 181.639 182.214 181.541 181.864 181.963 182.058 182.190 182.346 182.561 181.389 182.040 181.711 182.878 204.982 205.374 205.659 204.876 204.865 205.149 205.714 205.747 205.724 205.699 205.800 205.609 205.512 204.744 205.689 205.185 1 12,1 14,9 1 1 1 10,4 10,7 12,3 12,4 13,9 15,7 18,0 1 12,9 15,7 Width Height Height Degrees from Slope of a.g.l. south cw window [ ] [ ] 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Direction mode 25-10-2017 16:50 / 1

SHADOW - Main Result Calculation Results Shadow receptor Shadow, worst case Shadow, expected values No. Shadow hours Shadow days Max shadow Shadow hours per year per year hours per day per year [h/year] [days/year] [h/day] [h/year] A 155:01 209 1:06 25:06 B 152:56 148 1:56 34:19 C 83:19 95 1:24 13:44 D 208:04 183 2:10 49:32 E 329:41 294 1:38 53:31 F 190:11 256 1:35 36:26 G 217:39 120 2:13 25:18 H 207:56 101 2:21 22:45 I 243:13 112 2:44 28:00 J 245:56 137 2:21 32:22 K 103:04 114 1:13 13:49 L 203:22 181 1:54 30:20 M 86:32 141 0:51 12:01 N 153:16 165 1:28 26:09 O 171:41 144 1:54 22:01 P 170:54 201 1:36 28:39 Total amount of flickering on the shadow receptors caused by each WTG No. Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Worst case Expected [h/year] [h/year] SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 9 m (TOT: 15 m) (1) 970:08 139:53 SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 9 m (TOT: 15 m) (2) 676:06 110:12 SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 8 m (TOT: 14 m) (7) 547:42 112:00 SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 8 m (TOT: 14 m) (8) 421:47 54:48 SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 8 m (TOT: 14 m) (9) 191:09 29:05 ENERCON E-92 2,3 MW 2300 92.0!-! hub: 108,4 m (TOT: 154,4 m) (10) 4:31 1:06 ENERCON E-92 2,3 MW 2300 92.0!-! hub: 108,4 m (TOT: 154,4 m) (11) 0:00 0:00 Total times in Receptor wise and WTG wise tables can differ, as a WTG can lead to flicker at 2 or more receptors simultaneously and/or receptors may receive flicker from 2 or more WTGs simultaneously. 25-10-2017 16:50 / 2

SHADOW - Calendar, graphical WTGs 1: SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 9 m (TOT: 15 m) (1) 2: SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 9 m (TOT: 15 m) (2) 3: SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 8 m (TOT: 14 m) (7) 4: SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 8 m (TOT: 14 m) (8) 5: SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 8 m (TOT: 14 m) (9) 25-10-2017 16:50 / 3

SHADOW - Calendar, graphical WTGs 1: SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 9 m (TOT: 15 m) (1) 2: SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 9 m (TOT: 15 m) (2) 3: SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 8 m (TOT: 14 m) (7) 5: SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 8 m (TOT: 14 m) (9) 25-10-2017 16:50 / 4

SHADOW - Calendar, graphical WTGs 1: SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 9 m (TOT: 15 m) (1) 2: SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 9 m (TOT: 15 m) (2) 3: SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 8 m (TOT: 14 m) (7) 4: SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 8 m (TOT: 14 m) (8) 5: SWT-2.3-120 2300 120.0!O! hub: 8 m (TOT: 14 m) (9) 6: ENERCON E-92 2,3 MW 2300 92.0!-! hub: 108,4 m (TOT: 154,4 m) (10) 25-10-2017 16:50 / 5

SHADOW - Calendar per WTG, graphical Shadow receptors A: Shadow Receptor: Azimuth: Slope: 9 (1) I: Shadow Receptor: Azimuth: Slope: 9 (9) B: Shadow Receptor: Azimuth: Slope: 9 (2) J: Shadow Receptor: Azimuth: Slope: 9 (10) C: Shadow Receptor: Azimuth: Slope: 9 (3) K: Shadow Receptor: Azimuth: Slope: 9 (11) D: Shadow Receptor: Azimuth: Slope: 9 (4) L: Shadow Receptor: Azimuth: Slope: 9 (12) E: Shadow Receptor: Azimuth: Slope: 9 (5) M: Shadow Receptor: Azimuth: Slope: 9 (13) F: Shadow Receptor: Azimuth: Slope: 9 (6) N: Shadow Receptor: Azimuth: Slope: 9 (14) G: Shadow Receptor: Azimuth: Slope: 9 (7) O: Shadow Receptor: Azimuth: Slope: 9 (15) H: Shadow Receptor: Azimuth: Slope: 9 (8) P: Shadow Receptor: Azimuth: Slope: 9 (17) 25-10-2017 16:50 / 6

SHADOW - Calendar per WTG, graphical Shadow receptors 25-10-2017 16:50 / 7

SHADOW - Map Hours per year, real case 4 8 16 32 0 250 500 750 1000 m Map: HERENTALS2, Print scale 1:20.000, Map center Belgian Lambert72-BD72 (BE 2001 <±1m) East: 182.195 North: 205.344 New WTG Shadow receptor Flicker map level: Height Contours: CONTOURLINE_ONLINEDATA_19.wpo (1) 25-10-2017 16:50 / 8