The Riemann-Roch Theorem

Similar documents
The Riemann-Roch Theorem

The Riemann-Roch Theorem

WHAT IS K-HOMOLOGY? Paul Baum Penn State. Texas A&M University College Station, Texas, USA. April 2, 2014

Atiyah-Singer Revisited

Dirac Operator. Texas A&M University College Station, Texas, USA. Paul Baum Penn State. March 31, 2014

Dirac Operator. Göttingen Mathematical Institute. Paul Baum Penn State 6 February, 2017

Recall for an n n matrix A = (a ij ), its trace is defined by. a jj. It has properties: In particular, if B is non-singular n n matrix,

BEYOND ELLIPTICITY. Paul Baum Penn State. Fields Institute Toronto, Canada. June 20, 2013

APPENDIX 1: REVIEW OF SINGULAR COHOMOLOGY

Hochschild homology and Grothendieck Duality

Topology of Toric Varieties, Part II

HODGE GENERA OF ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES, II.

HODGE NUMBERS OF COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS

Algebraic Cobordism Lecture 1: Complex cobordism and algebraic cobordism

Invariance Theory, the Heat Equation, and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem

Celebrating One Hundred Fifty Years of. Topology. ARBEITSTAGUNG Bonn, May 22, 2013

Hodge Theory of Maps

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 19

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula

3. Lecture 3. Y Z[1/p]Hom (Sch/k) (Y, X).

A users guide to K-theory

Math 231b Lecture 16. G. Quick

THE GROTHENDIECK-RIEMANN-ROCH THEOREM FOR VARIETIES

Categories and functors

An overview of D-modules: holonomic D-modules, b-functions, and V -filtrations

EQUIVARIANT CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES OF SINGULAR COMPLEX ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES

Chern numbers and Hilbert Modular Varieties

3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection

Algebraic Topology Final

Algebraic v.s. Analytic Point of View

APPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS

x X p K i (k(x)) K i 1 (M p+1 )

1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties

KR-theory. Jean-Louis Tu. Lyon, septembre Université de Lorraine France. IECL, UMR 7502 du CNRS

NAIVE MOTIVIC DONALDSON THOMAS TYPE HIRZEBRUCH CLASSES AND SOME PROBLEMS

Algebraic Cobordism. 2nd German-Chinese Conference on Complex Geometry East China Normal University Shanghai-September 11-16, 2006.

Contributors. Preface

IND-COHERENT SHEAVES AND SERRE DUALITY II. 1. Introduction

LECTURE 3: RELATIVE SINGULAR HOMOLOGY

Direct Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Some remarks on Frobenius and Lefschetz in étale cohomology

Math 797W Homework 4

DEFINITION OF ABELIAN VARIETIES AND THE THEOREM OF THE CUBE

Algebraic Topology II Notes Week 12

Algebraic cycle complexes

Duality, Residues, Fundamental class

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY: GLOSSARY AND EXAMPLES

Operator Algebras II, Homological functors, derived functors, Adams spectral sequence, assembly map and BC for compact quantum groups.

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4)

Algebraic Curves and Riemann Surfaces

Overview of Atiyah-Singer Index Theory

Derived categories, perverse sheaves and intermediate extension functor

An introduction to calculus of functors

The Canonical Sheaf. Stefano Filipazzi. September 14, 2015

LECTURE 1: SOME GENERALITIES; 1 DIMENSIONAL EXAMPLES

An introduction to derived and triangulated categories. Jon Woolf

Operator algebras and topology

SERRE FINITENESS AND SERRE VANISHING FOR NON-COMMUTATIVE P 1 -BUNDLES ADAM NYMAN

DAVE ANDERSON AND SAM PAYNE

Fourier Mukai transforms II Orlov s criterion

The Ordinary RO(C 2 )-graded Cohomology of a Point

GK-SEMINAR SS2015: SHEAF COHOMOLOGY

Modern index Theory lectures held at CIRM rencontré Theorie d indice, Mar 2006

THE ARITHMETIC GROTHENDIECK-RIEMANN-ROCH THEOREM FOR GENERAL PROJECTIVE MORPHISMS

Coherent sheaves on elliptic curves.

K-Homology, Assembly and Rigidity Theorems for Relative Eta Invariants

= Spec(Rf ) R p. 2 R m f gives a section a of the stalk bundle over X f as follows. For any [p] 2 X f (f /2 p), let a([p]) = ([p], a) wherea =

A p-adic GEOMETRIC LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE FOR GL 1

The Mukai pairing, I: a categorical approach

COMPLEX ALGEBRAIC SURFACES CLASS 4

CATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths.

The Theorem of Gauß-Bonnet in Complex Analysis 1

The diagonal property for abelian varieties

ABSTRACT DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY VIA SHEAF THEORY

CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES

Math 248B. Applications of base change for coherent cohomology

CHAPTER 1. Étale cohomology

Chern Classes and the Chern Character

Arithmetic of certain integrable systems. University of Chicago & Vietnam Institute for Advanced Study in Mathematics

Elliptic curves, Néron models, and duality

THE HODGE DECOMPOSITION

E 0 0 F [E] + [F ] = 3. Chern-Weil Theory How can you tell if idempotents over X are similar?

Kähler manifolds and variations of Hodge structures

Introduction to Index Theory. Elmar Schrohe Institut für Analysis

HOMOTOPY APPROXIMATION OF MODULES

Topological K-theory

STEENROD OPERATIONS IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY

6. Lecture cdh and Nisnevich topologies. These are Grothendieck topologies which play an important role in Suslin-Voevodsky s approach to not

Show that the second projection Ñ Fl n identifies Ñ as a vector bundle over Fl n. In particular, Ñ is smooth. (Challenge:

A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 28 Sep 2016

Real affine varieties and obstruction theories

Cohomology jump loci of local systems

The Strominger Yau Zaslow conjecture

Constructible Derived Category

Theta divisors and the Frobenius morphism

Introduction to the Baum-Connes conjecture

Non-injectivity of the map from the Witt group of a variety to the Witt group of its function field

Lecture 1. Toric Varieties: Basics

Transcription:

The Riemann-Roch Theorem TIFR Mumbai, India Paul Baum Penn State 7 August, 2015

Five lectures: 1. Dirac operator 2. Atiyah-Singer revisited 3. What is K-homology? 4. Beyond ellipticity 5. The Riemann-Roch theorem

THE RIEMANN-ROCH THEOREM 1. Classical Riemann-Roch 2. Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch (HRR) 3. Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch (GRR) 4. RR for possibly singular varieties (Baum-Fulton-MacPherson)

REFERENCES P. Baum, W. Fulton, and R. MacPherson Riemann-Roch for singular varieties Publ. Math. IHES 45: 101-167, 1975. P. Baum, W. Fulton, and R. MacPherson Riemann-Roch and topological K-theory for singular varieties Acta Math. 143: 155-192, 1979. P. Baum, W. Fulton, and G. Quart Lefschetz-Riemann-Roch for singular varieties Acta Math. 143: 193-211, 1979.

HIRZEBRUCH-RIEMANN-ROCH M non-singular projective algebraic variety / C E an algebraic vector bundle on M E = sheaf of germs of algebraic sections of E H j (M, E) := j-th cohomology of M using E, j = 0, 1, 2, 3,...

LEMMA For all j = 0, 1, 2,... dim C H j (M, E) <. For all j > dim C (M), H j (M, E) = 0. χ(m, E) := n = dim C (M) n ( 1) j dim C H j (M, E) j=0 THEOREM[HRR] Let M be a non-singular projective algebraic variety / C and let E be an algebraic vector bundle on M. Then χ(m, E) = (ch(e) T d(m))[m]

Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch Theorem (HRR) Let M be a non-singular projective algebraic variety / C and let E be an algebraic vector bundle on M. Then χ(m, E) = (ch(e) T d(m))[m]

EXAMPLE. Let M be a compact complex-analytic manifold. Set Ω p,q = C (M, Λ p,q T M) Ω p,q is the C vector space of all C differential forms of type (p, q) Dolbeault complex 0 Ω 0,0 Ω 0,1 Ω 0,2 Ω 0,n 0 The Dirac operator (of the underlying Spin c manifold) is the assembled Dolbeault complex + : j Ω 0, 2j j 0, 2j+1 Ω The index of this operator is the arithmetic genus of M i.e. is the Euler number of the Dolbeault complex.

Let X be a finite CW complex. The three versions of K-homology are isomorphic. K homotopy j (X) K j(x) KK j (C(X), C) homotopy theory K-cycles Atiyah-BDF-Kasparov j = 0, 1

Let X be a finite CW complex. The three versions of K-homology are isomorphic. K homotopy j (X) K j(x) KK j (C(X), C) homotopy theory K-cycles Atiyah-BDF-Kasparov j = 0, 1

X is a finite CW complex. CHERN CHARACTER The Chern character is often viewed as a functorial map of contravariant functors : ch: K j (X) l H j+2l (X; Q) Note that this is a map of rings. j = 0, 1

X is a finite CW complex. A more inclusive (and more accurate) view of the Chern character is that it is a pair of functorial maps : ch: K j (X) l H j+2l (X; Q) contravariant ch # : K j (X) l H j+2l (X; Q) covariant K (X) is a module over K (X). H (X; Q) is a module over H (X; Q). cap product The Chern character respects these module structures.

Definition of the Chern character in homology j = 0, 1 ch # : K j (X) l H j+2l (X; Q) covariant ch # (M, E, ϕ) := ϕ (ch(e) T d(m)) [M]) ϕ : H (M; Q) H (X; Q)

K (X) is a module over K (X). Let (M, E, ϕ) be a K-cycle on X. Let F be a C vector bundle on X. Then: F (M, E, ϕ) := (M, E ϕ (F ), ϕ) and the module structure is respected : ch # (F (M, E, ϕ)) = ch(f ) ch # (M, E, ϕ)

K-theory and K-homology in algebraic geometry Let X be a (possibly singular) projective algebraic variety /C. Grothendieck defined two abelian groups: Kalg 0 (X) = Grothendieck group of algebraic vector bundles on X. K alg 0 (X) = Grothendieck group of coherent algebraic sheaves on X. Kalg 0 (X) = the algebraic geometry K-theory of X contravariant. K alg 0 (X) = the algebraic geometry K-homology of X covariant.

K-theory in algebraic geometry Vect alg X = set of isomorphism classes of algebraic vector bundles on X. A(Vect alg X) = free abelian group with one generator for each element [E] Vect alg X. For each short exact sequence ξ 0 E E E 0 of algebraic vector bundles on X, let r(ξ) A(Vect alg X) be r(ξ) := [E ] + [E ] [E]

K-theory in algebraic geometry R A(Vect alg (X)) is the subgroup of A(Vect alg X) generated by all r(ξ) A(Vect alg X). DEFINITION. K 0 alg (X) := A(Vect algx)/r Let X, Y be (possibly singular) projective algebraic varieties /C. Let f : X Y be a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then have the map of abelian groups f : K 0 alg (X) K0 alg (Y ) [f E] [E] Vector bundles pull back. f E is the pull-back via f of E.

K-homology in algebraic geometry S alg X = set of isomorphism classes of coherent algebraic sheaves on X. A(S alg X) = free abelian group with one generator for each element [E] S alg X. For each short exact sequence ξ 0 E E E 0 of coherent algebraic sheaves on X, let r(ξ) A(S alg X) be r(ξ) := [E ] + [E ] [E]

K-homology in algebraic geometry R A(S alg (X)) is the subgroup of A(S alg X) generated by all r(ξ) A(S alg X). DEFINITION. K alg 0 (X) := A(S alg X)/R Let X, Y be (possibly singular) projective algebraic varieties /C. Let f : X Y be a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then have the map of abelian groups f : K alg 0 (X) K alg 0 (Y ) [E] Σ j ( 1) j [(R j f)e]

f : X Y morphism of algebraic varieties E coherent algebraic sheaf on X For j 0, define a presheaf (W j f)e on Y by U H j (f 1 U; E f 1 U) U an open subset of Y Then (R j f)e := the sheafification of (W j f)e

f : X Y morphism of algebraic varieties f : K alg 0 (X) K alg 0 (Y ) [E] Σ j ( 1) j [(R j f)e]

SPECIAL CASE of f : K alg 0 (X) K alg 0 (Y ) Y is a point. Y = ɛ: X is the map of X to a point. Kalg 0 ( ) = Kalg 0 ( ) = Z ɛ : K alg 0 (X) K alg 0 ( ) = Z ɛ (E) = χ(x; E) = Σ j ( 1) j dim C H j (X; E)

X non-singular = K 0 alg (X) = K alg 0 (X) Let X be non-singular. Let E be an algebraic vector bundle on X. E denotes the sheaf of germs of algebraic sections of E. Then E E is an isomorphism of abelian groups Kalg 0 (X) Kalg 0 (X) This is Poincaré duality within the context of algebraic geometry K-theory&K-homology.

X non-singular = K 0 alg (X) = K alg 0 (X) Let X be non-singular. The inverse map is defined as follows. K alg 0 (X) K 0 alg (X) Let F be a coherent algebraic sheaf on X. Since X is non-singular, F has a finite resolution by algebraic vector bundles.

X non-singular = K 0 alg (X) = K alg 0 (X) F has a finite resolution by algebraic vector bundles. i.e. algebraic vector bundles on X E r, E r 1,..., E 0 and an exact sequence of coherent algebraic sheaves 0 E r E r 1... E 0 F 0 Then K alg 0 (X) Kalg 0 (X) is F Σ j ( 1) j E j

Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch Theorem (GRR) Let X, Y be non-singular projective algebraic varieties /C, and let f : X Y be a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then there is commutativity in the diagram : K 0 alg (X) K0 alg (Y ) ch( ) T d(x) ch( ) T d(y ) H (X; Q) H (Y ; Q)

WARNING!!! The horizontal arrows in the GRR commutative diagram K 0 alg (X) K0 alg (Y ) ch( ) T d(x) ch( ) T d(y ) are wrong-way (i.e. Gysin) maps. H (X; Q) H (Y ; Q) K 0 alg (X) = K alg 0 (X) f K alg 0 (Y ) = K 0 alg (Y ) H (X; Q) = H (X; Q) f H (Y ; Q) = H (Y ; Q) Poincaré duality Poincaré duality

Riemann-Roch for possibly singular complex projective algebraic varieties Let X be a (possibly singular) projective algebraic variety / C Then (Baum-Fulton-MacPherson) there are functorial maps α X : K 0 alg (X) K0 top(x) K-theory contravariant natural transformation of contravariant functors β X : K alg 0 (X) K top 0 (X) K-homology covariant natural transformation of covariant functors Everything is natural. No wrong-way (i.e. Gysin) maps are used.

α X : K 0 alg (X) K0 top(x) is the forgetful map which sends an algebraic vector bundle E to the underlying topological vector bundle of E. α X (E) := E topological

Let X, Y be projective algebraic varieties /C, and let f : X Y be a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then there is commutativity in the diagram : K 0 alg (X) K0 alg (Y ) α X α Y K 0 top(x) K 0 top(y ) i.e. natural transformation of contravariant functors

Let X, Y be projective algebraic varieties /C, and let f : X Y be a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then there is commutativity in the diagram : K 0 alg (X) K0 alg (Y ) α X α Y K 0 top(x) K 0 top(y ) ch ch H (X; Q) H (Y ; Q)

Let X, Y be projective algebraic varieties /C, and let f : X Y be a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then there is commutativity in the diagram : K alg 0 (X) K alg 0 (Y ) β X β Y K top 0 (X) Ktop 0 (Y ) i.e. natural transformation of covariant functors Notation. K top is K-cycle K-homology.

Let X, Y be projective algebraic varieties /C, and let f : X Y be a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then there is commutativity in the diagram : K 0 alg (X) K0 alg (Y ) α X α Y K 0 top(x) K 0 top(y ) ch ch H (X; Q) H (Y ; Q)

Let X, Y be projective algebraic varieties /C, and let f : X Y be a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then there is commutativity in the diagram : K alg 0 (X) K alg 0 (Y ) β X β Y K top 0 (X) Ktop 0 (Y ) ch # ch # H (X; Q) H (Y ; Q)

Definition of β X : K alg 0 (X) K top 0 (X) Let F be a coherent algebraic sheaf on X. Choose an embedding of projective algebraic varieties where W is non-singular. ι: X W ι F is the push forward (i.e. extend by zero) of F. ι F is a coherent algebraic sheaf on W.

ι F is a coherent algebraic sheaf on W. Since W is non-singular, ι F has a finite resolution by algebraic vector bundles. Consider 0 E r E r 1... E 0 ι F 0 0 E r E r 1... E 0 0 These are algebraic vector bundles on W and maps of algebraic vector bundles such that for each p W ι(x) the sequence of finite dimensional C vector spaces is exact. 0 (E r ) p (E r 1 ) p... (E 0 ) p 0

Choose Hermitian structures for E r, E r 1,..., E 0 Then for each vector bundle map there is the adjoint map σ : E j E j 1 σ : E j E j 1 σ σ : j E 2j j E 2j+1 is a map of topological vector bundles which is an isomorphism on W ι(x).

Let Ω be an open set in W with smooth boundary Ω such that Ω = Ω Ω is a compact manifold with boundary which retracts onto ι(x). Ω ι(x). Set M = Ω Ω Ω M is a closed Spin c manifold which maps to X by: ϕ: M = Ω Ω Ω Ω ι(x) = X

On M = Ω Ω Ω let E be the topological vector bundle E 2j (σ σ ) E 2j+1 E = j Then β X : K alg 0 (X) K top 0 (X) is : F (M, E, ϕ) j M = Ω Ω Ω

Equivalent definition of β X : K alg 0 (X) K top 0 (X) Let (M, E, ϕ) be an algebraic K-cycle on X, i.e. M is a non-singular complex projective algebraic variety. E is an algebraic vector bundle on M. ϕ: M X is a morphism of projective algebraic varieties. Then: β X (ϕ (E)) = (M, E, ϕ) topological

Module structure Kalg 0 (X) is a ring and Kalg 0 (X) is a module over this ring. α X : K 0 alg (X) K0 top(x) is a homomorphism of rings. β X : K alg 0 (X) K top 0 (X) respects the module structures.

Todd class Set td(x) = ch (β X (O X )) td(x) H (X; Q) If X is non-singular, then td(x) = Todd(X) [X]. With X possibly singular and E an algebraic vector bundle on X χ(x, E) = ɛ (ch(e) td(x)) ɛ: X is the map of X to a point. ɛ : H (X; Q) H ( ; Q) = Q

Let X π be resolution of singularities in the sense of Hironaka. π : H ( X; Q) H (X; Q) X Lemma. π (T d( X) [ X]) is intrinsic to X i.e. does not depend on the choice of the resolution of singularities.

td(x) H (X : Q) is also intrinsic to X. td(x) π (T d( X) [ X]) is given by a homology class on X which (in a canonical way) is supported on the singular locus of X. Problem. In examples calculate td(x) H (X; Q). For toric varieties see papers of J. Shaneson and S. Cappell.