On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions

Similar documents
Free Probability Theory and Non-crossing Partitions. Roland Speicher Queen s University Kingston, Canada

Free Probability Theory and Random Matrices. Roland Speicher Queen s University Kingston, Canada

Abstract Algebra II Groups ( )

Operator-Valued Free Probability Theory and Block Random Matrices. Roland Speicher Queen s University Kingston

The Free Central Limit Theorem: A Combinatorial Approach

Matricial R-circular Systems and Random Matrices

Quantum Symmetric States

Quantum Symmetric States on Free Product C -Algebras

Ring Theory Problems. A σ

UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations

FREE PROBABILITY THEORY AND RANDOM MATRICES

arxiv: v2 [math.oa] 4 Aug 2017

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS LINEAR ALGEBRA

Algebraic Number Theory

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.oa] 6 May 2004

Second Order Freeness and Random Orthogonal Matrices

FREE PROBABILITY THEORY

3.1. Derivations. Let A be a commutative k-algebra. Let M be a left A-module. A derivation of A in M is a linear map D : A M such that

Mixed q-gaussian algebras and free transport

Selfadjoint Polynomials in Independent Random Matrices. Roland Speicher Universität des Saarlandes Saarbrücken

Lecture 2 Some Sources of Lie Algebras

Perron-Frobenius theorem

arxiv: v1 [math.oa] 20 Feb 2018

Commutative Banach algebras 79

Free Probability Theory and Random Matrices. Roland Speicher Queen s University Kingston, Canada

Exercises on chapter 4

ILWOO CHO. In this paper, we will reformulate the moments and cumulants of the so-called generating operator T 0 = N

Homework #05, due 2/17/10 = , , , , , Additional problems recommended for study: , , 10.2.

Free Probability Theory and Random Matrices

Free Probability Theory and Random Matrices

Combinatorial Aspects of Free Probability and Free Stochastic Calculus

Algebraic structures I

Factorizable completely positive maps and quantum information theory. Magdalena Musat. Sym Lecture Copenhagen, May 9, 2012

Rings and groups. Ya. Sysak

Plan 1 Motivation & Terminology 2 Noncommutative De Finetti Theorems 3 Braidability 4 Quantum Exchangeability 5 References

Subrings and Ideals 2.1 INTRODUCTION 2.2 SUBRING

Representations and Derivations of Modules

Fractional Index Theory

Matrix operations Linear Algebra with Computer Science Application

THE STRUCTURE OF THE CLASSIFYING RING OF FORMAL GROUPS WITH COMPLEX MULTIPLICATION.

Spring, 2012 CIS 515. Fundamentals of Linear Algebra and Optimization Jean Gallier

Problems in Linear Algebra and Representation Theory

Limit Laws for Random Matrices from Traffic Probability

Week 4-5: Binary Relations

THE COMPLETELY BOUNDED APPROXIMATION PROPERTY FOR EXTENDED CUNTZ PIMSNER ALGEBRAS

Applications and fundamental results on random Vandermon

Linear Equations in Linear Algebra

Azumaya Algebras. Dennis Presotto. November 4, Introduction: Central Simple Algebras

RECTANGULAR RANDOM MATRICES, ENTROPY, AND FISHER S INFORMATION

Free Probability Theory

DERIVATIONS. Introduction to non-associative algebra. Playing havoc with the product rule? BERNARD RUSSO University of California, Irvine

Generators of affine W-algebras

Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra

Free probability and quantum information

SUMMARY ALGEBRA I LOUIS-PHILIPPE THIBAULT

A note on a construction of J. F. Feinstein

Course 421: Algebraic Topology Section 8: Modules

Matrix Algebra. Matrix Algebra. Chapter 8 - S&B

ON REGULARITY OF RINGS 1

Equalizers and kernels in categories of monoids

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory

Lecture slide No.1 for Math 207a Winter 2019 Haruzo Hida

MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 8: Vector spaces. Subspaces.

von Neumann algebras, II 1 factors, and their subfactors V.S. Sunder (IMSc, Chennai)

On corrections of classical multivariate tests for high-dimensional data. Jian-feng. Yao Université de Rennes 1, IRMAR

Tori for some locally integral group rings

LINEAR PRESERVER PROBLEMS: generalized inverse

Entanglement, games and quantum correlations

Matsumura: Commutative Algebra Part 2

= ϕ r cos θ. 0 cos ξ sin ξ and sin ξ cos ξ. sin ξ 0 cos ξ

From random matrices to free groups, through non-crossing partitions. Michael Anshelevich

What is a quantum symmetry?

Categorical techniques for NC geometry and gravity

Continuous Random Variables

Introduction to modules

Trace Class Operators and Lidskii s Theorem

THE NONCOMMUTATIVE TORUS

REFLEXIVITY OF THE SPACE OF MODULE HOMOMORPHISMS

1.4 Solvable Lie algebras

Homework 10 M 373K by Mark Lindberg (mal4549)

COMMUNICATIONS IN ALGEBRA, 15(3), (1987) A NOTE ON PRIME IDEALS WHICH TEST INJECTIVITY. John A. Beachy and William D.

Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky

Week 4-5: Binary Relations

On corrections of classical multivariate tests for high-dimensional data

Algebraic Structures Exam File Fall 2013 Exam #1

Weyl s Character Formula for Representations of Semisimple Lie Algebras

Physics 129B, Winter 2010 Problem Set 4 Solution

(Not only) Line bundles over noncommutative spaces

PART I. Abstract algebraic categories

ADVANCED COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA: PROBLEM SETS

Quantum symmetries in free probability. Stephen Robert Curran

Analytic versus Combinatorial in Free Probability

Colby College Catalogue

Supplement. Dr. Bob s Modern Algebra Glossary Based on Fraleigh s A First Course on Abstract Algebra, 7th Edition, Sections 0 through IV.

Boolean Inner-Product Spaces and Boolean Matrices

CLIFFORD ALGEBRAS AND DIRAC OPERATORS

Casimir elements for classical Lie algebras. and affine Kac Moody algebras

(6) For any finite dimensional real inner product space V there is an involutive automorphism α : C (V) C (V) such that α(v) = v for all v V.

ANALYSIS & PDE. mathematical sciences publishers DIMITRI SHLYAKHTENKO LOWER ESTIMATES ON MICROSTATES FREE ENTROPY DIMENSION

ORIE 6300 Mathematical Programming I August 25, Recitation 1

Transcription:

On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions Paul Skoufranis TAMU March 22, 2016 Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 1 / 30

Bi-Free with Amalgamation Let B be a unital algebra. Let X be a B-B-bimodule that may be decomposed as X = B X. The projection map p : X B is given by p(b η) = b. Thus p(b ξ b ) = bp(ξ)b. For b B, define L b, R b L(X ) by L b (ξ) = b ξ and R b (ξ) = ξ b. Define E : L(X ) B by E(T ) = p(t (1 B 0)). E(L b R b T ) = p(l b R b (E(T ) η)) = p(be(t )b η ) = be(t )b. E(TL b ) = p(t (b 0)) = E(TR b ). Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 2 / 30

B-B-Non-Commutative Probability Space E(L b R b T ) = be(t )b and E(TL b ) = E(TR b ). Definition A B-B-non-commutative probability space is a triple (A, E, ε) where A is a unital algebra over C, ε : B B op A is a unital homomorphism such that ε B I and ε I B op are injective, and E : A B is a linear map such that E(ε(b 1 b 2 )T ) = b 1 E(T )b 2 and E(T ε(b 1 B )) = E(T ε(1 B b)). Denote L b = ε(b 1 B ) and R b = ε(1 B b). Every B-B-non-commutative probability space can be embedded into L(X ) for some B-B-bimodule X. Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 3 / 30

B-NCPS via B-B-NCPS Definition Let (A, E, ε) be a B-B-ncps. The unital subalgebras of A defined by A l := {Z A ZR b = R b Z for all b B} and A r := {Z A ZL b = L b Z for all b B} are called the left and right algebras of A respectively. A pair of algebras (A 1, A 2 ) is said to be a pair of B-faces if {L b } b B A 1 A l and {R b } b B op A 2 A r. Note (A l, E) is a B-ncps where {L b } b B is the copy of B. Indeed for T A l and b 1, b 2 B, E(L b1 TL b2 ) = E(L b1 TR b2 ) = E(L b1 R b2 T ) = b 1 E(T )b 2. Similarly (A r, E) is as B op -ncps where {R b } b B op is the copy of B op. Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 4 / 30

Bi-Free Independence with Amalgamation Definition Let (A, E A, ε) be a B-B-ncps. Pairs of B-faces (A l,1, A r,1 ) and (A l,2, A r,2 ) of A are said to be bi-freely independent with amalgamation over B if there exist B-B-bimodules X k and unital B-homomorphisms α k : A l,k L(X k ) l and β k : A r,k L(X k ) r such that the following diagram commutes: A l,1 A r,1 A l,2 A i r,2 A B E A α 1 β 1 α 2 β 2 E L(X1 X 2 ) λ 1 ρ 1 λ 2 ρ 2 L(X 1 ) l L(X 1 ) r L(X 2 ) l L(X 2 ) r L(X 1 X 2 ) Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 5 / 30

Operator-Valued Bi-Freeness and Mixed Cumulants Theorem (Charlesworth, Nelson, Skoufranis; 2015) Let (A, E, ε) be a B-B-ncps and let {(A l,k, A r,k )} k K be pairs of B-faces. Then the following are equivalent: {(A l,k, A r,k )} k K are bi-free over B. For all χ : {1,..., n} {l, r}, ɛ : {1,..., n} K, and Z m A χ(m),ɛ(m), E(Z 1 Z m ) = π BNC(χ) σ BNC(χ) π σ ɛ µ BNC (π, σ) E π(z 1,..., Z m ) For all χ : {1,..., n} {l, r}, ɛ : {1,..., n} K non-constant, and Z m A χ(m),ɛ(m), κ χ (Z 1,..., Z n ) = 0. Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 6 / 30

Bi-Multiplicative Functions κ and E are special functions where E 1χ (Z 1,..., Z n ) = E(Z 1 Z n ). Given (A, E, ε), a bi-multiplicative function Φ is a map Φ : BNC(χ) A χ(1) A χ(n) B n 1 χ:{1,...,n} {l,r} whose properties are described as follows: Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 7 / 30

Property 1 of Bi-Multiplicative Functions Φ 1χ (Z 1 L b1, Z 2 R b2, Z 3 L b3, Z 4 ) = Φ 1χ (Z 1, Z 2, L b1 Z 3, R b2 Z 4 R b3 ). Z 1 L b1 Z 2 R b2 Z 3 L b3 Z 4 Z 1 L b1 Z 2 Z 3 R b2 Z 4 R b3 Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 8 / 30

Property 1 of Bi-Multiplicative Functions Φ 1χ (Z 1 L b1, Z 2 R b2, Z 3 L b3, Z 4 ) = Φ 1χ (Z 1, Z 2, L b1 Z 3, R b2 Z 4 R b3 ). Z 1 L b1 Z 2 R b2 Z 3 L b3 Z 4 Z 1 L b1 Z 2 Z 3 R b2 Z 4 R b3 Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 8 / 30

Property 2 of Bi-Multiplicative Functions Φ 1χ (L b1 Z 1, Z 2, R b2 Z 3, Z 4 ) = b 1 Φ 1χ (Z 1, Z 2, Z 3, Z 4 )b 2. L b1 Z 1 Z 2 R b2 Z 3 Z 4 Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 9 / 30

Property 3 of Bi-Multiplicative Functions Φ π (Z 1,..., Z 8 ) = Φ 1χ1 (Z 1, Z 3, Z 4 )Φ 1χ2 (Z 5, Z 7, Z 8 )Φ 1χ3 (Z 2, Z 6 ). 1 3 4 5 8 2 6 7 Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 10 / 30

Property 4 of Bi-Multiplicative Functions Φ π (Z 1,..., Z 10 ) = Φ 1χ1 (Z 1, Z 3, L Φ1χ2 (Z 4,Z 5 )Z 6, R Φ1χ3 (Z 2,Z 8 )Z 9 R Φ1χ4 (Z 7,Z 10 ) ) Z 1 Z 1 Z 2 Z 3 Z 4 Z 5 Z 6 Z 7 Z 3 L Φ1χ2 (Z 4,Z 5 ) Z 6 R Φ1χ3 (Z 2,Z 8 ) Z 8 Z 9 Z 9 Z 10 Φ 1χ4 (Z 7, Z 10 ) Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 11 / 30

Property 4 of Bi-Multiplicative Functions Φ π (Z 1,..., Z 10 ) = Φ 1χ1 (Z 1, Z 3, L Φ1χ2 (Z 4,Z 5 )Z 6, R Φ1χ3 (Z 2,Z 8 )Z 9 R Φ1χ4 (Z 7,Z 10 ) ) Z 1 Z 1 Z 2 Z 3 Z 4 Z 5 Z 6 Z 7 Z 3 L Φ1χ2 (Z 4,Z 5 ) Z 6 R Φ1χ3 (Z 2,Z 8 ) Z 8 Z 9 Z 9 Z 10 Φ 1χ4 (Z 7, Z 10 ) Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 11 / 30

Amalgamating Over Matrices Let (A, ϕ) be a non-commutative probability space. M N (A) is naturally a M N (C)-ncps where the expectation map ϕ N : M N (A) M N (C) is defined via ϕ N ([A i,j ]) = [ϕ(a i,j )]. If A 1, A 2 are unital subalgebras of A that are free with respect to ϕ, then M N (A 1 ) and M N (A 2 ) are free with amalgamation over M N (C) with respect to ϕ N. Is there a bi-free analogue of this result? Is M N (A) a M N (C)-M N (C)-ncps? Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 12 / 30

B-B-NCPS Associated to A Let (A, ϕ) be a non-commutative probability space and let B be a unital algebra. Then A B is a B-B-bi-module where L b (a b ) = a bb, and R b (a b ) = a b b. If p : A B B is defined by then L(A B) is a B-B-ncps with p(a b) = ϕ(a)b, E(Z) = p(z(1 A 1 B )). If X, Y A, defined L(X b) L(A B) l and R(Y b) L(A B) r via L(X b)(a b ) = Xa bb and R(Y b)(a b ) = Ya b b. Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 13 / 30

Bi-Freeness Preserved Under Tensoring Theorem (Skoufranis; 2015) Let (A, ϕ) be a non-commutative probability space and let {(A l,k, A r,k )} k K be bi-free pairs of faces with respect to ϕ. If B is a unital algebra, then {(L(A l,k B), R(A r,k B))} k K are bi-free over B with respect to E as described above. Proof Sketch. If χ : {1,..., n} {l, r}, Z m = L(X m b m ) if χ(m) = l, and Z m = R(X m b m ) if χ(m) = r, then E(Z 1 Z n ) = ϕ(x 1 X n ) b sχ(1) b sχ(n) Also E π (Z 1 Z n ) = ϕ π (X 1,..., X n ) b sχ(1) b sχ(n). Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 14 / 30

Bi-Matrix Models - Creation/Annihilation on a Fock Space Theorem (Skoufranis; 2015) Given an index set K, an N N, and an orthonormal set of vectors {h k i,j i, j {1,..., N}, k K} H, let L k (N) := 1 N R k (N) := 1 N N i,j=1 N i,j=1 L(l(hi,j) k E i,j ), L 1 k (N) := N R(r(hi,j) k E i,j ), Rk 1 (N) := N N i,j=1 N i,j=1 L(l(h k j,i) E i,j ) R(r(h k j,i) E i,j ). If E : L(L(F(H)) M N (C)) M N (C) is the expectation, the joint distribution of {L k (N), L k (N), R k(n), R k (N)} k K with respect to 1 N Tr E is equal the joint distribution of {l(h k ), l (h k ), r(h k ), r (h k )} k K with respect to ϕ where {h k } k K H is an orthonormal set. Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 15 / 30

Bi-Matrix Models - q-deformed Fock Space Moreover (L(I F(H) M N (C)), R(I F(H) M N (C))) and {(L k (N), L k (N)), (R k(n), R k (N))} k K are bi-free. Considering the q-deformed Fock space, the joint distribution of the q-deformed versions {(L k (N), L k (N), Lt k (N), L,t k (N)), (R k(n), Rk (N), Rt k (N), R,t k (N))} k K with respect to 1 N Tr E asymptotically equals the joint distribution of {(l(h k ), l (h k ), l(h k 0), l (h k 0)), (r(h k ), r (h k ), r(h k 0), r (h k 0))} k K with respect to ϕ where {h k, h k 0 } k K H is an orthonormal set, and are asymptotically bi-free from (L(I Fq(H) M N (C)), R(I Fq(H) M N (C))). Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 16 / 30

Amalgamating over a Smaller Subalgebra Suppose (A, E, ε) is a B-B-ncps. Let D be a unital subalgebra of B, and let F : B D be such that F (1 B ) = 1 D and F (d 1 bd 2 ) = d 1 F (b)d 2 for all d 1, d 2 D and b B. Note (A, F E, ε D D op) is a D-D-ncps since F (E(L d R d Z)) = F (de(z)d ) = df (E(Z))d F (E(ZL d )) = F (E(ZR d )) for all d, d D and Z A. Note A l,b A l,d and A r,b A r,d. How do the B-valued and D-valued distributions interact? How can one described said distributions? Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 17 / 30

Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions Suppose {Z i } i I A l and {Z j } j J A r. Suppose we wanted to describe all B-valued moments involving Z i1, Z j1, Z i2, and Z j2 each occurring once in that order. Z i1 Z j1 Z i2 Z j2 Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 18 / 30

Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions Suppose {Z i } i I A l and {Z j } j J A r. Suppose we wanted to describe all B-valued moments involving Z i1, Z j1, Z i2, and Z j2 each occurring once in that order. Z i1 Z j1 Z i2 Z j2 Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 18 / 30

Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions Suppose {Z i } i I A l and {Z j } j J A r. Let Z = {Z i } i I {Z j } j J. For n 1, ω : {1,..., n} I J, and b 1,..., b n 1 B, let µ B Z,ω (b 1,..., b n 1 ) = Expectation of Z ω(1),..., Z ω(n) in that order κ B Z,ω (b 1,..., b n 1 ) = with b 1,..., b n 1 in-between gaps with respect to the χ-ordering. Cumulant of Z ω(1),..., Z ω(n) in that order with b 1,..., b n 1 in-between gaps with respect to the χ-ordering. Similarly, we can define µ D Z,ω (d 1,..., d n 1 ) and κ D Z,ω (d 1,..., d n 1 ). Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 19 / 30

D-Valued Cumulants from B-Valued Cumulants Theorem (Skoufranis; 2015) If κ B Z,ω (d 1,..., d n 1 ) D for all n 1, ω : {1,..., n} I J, and d 1,..., d n 1 D, then κ D Z,ω (d 1,..., d n 1 ) = κ B Z,ω (d 1,..., d n 1 ) for all n 1, ω : {1,..., n} I J, and d 1,..., d n 1 D. Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 20 / 30

Bi-Free from B over D Theorem (Skoufranis; 2015) Assume that F : B D satisfies the following faithfulness condition: if b 1 B and F (b 2 b 1 ) = 0 for all b 2 B, then b 1 = 0. Then (alg(ε(d 1 D ), {Z i } i I ), alg(ε(1 D D op ), {Z j } j J )) is bi-free from (ε(b 1 B ), ε(1 B B op )) with amalgamation over D if and only if ( ) κ B Z,ω (b 1,..., b n 1 ) = F κ B Z,ω (F (b 1),..., F (b n 1 )) (1) for all n 1, ω : {1,..., n} I J, and b 1,..., b n 1 B. Alternatively, equation (1) is equivalent to κ B Z,ω (b 1,..., b n 1 ) = κ D Z,ω (F (b 1),..., F (b n 1 )). (2) This is a bi-free analogue of a result of Nica, Shlyakhtenko, and Speicher. Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 21 / 30

Bi-R-Cyclic Families Definition Let I and J be disjoint index sets and let The pair {[Z k;i,j ]} k I {[Z k;i,j ]} k J M N (A). ({[Z k;i,j ]} k I, {[Z k;i,j ]} k J ) is said to be R-cyclic if for every n 1, ω : {1,..., n} I J, and 1 i 1,..., i n, j 1,..., j n d, whenever at least one of κ C χ ω (Z ω(1);i1,j 1, Z ω(2);i2,j 2,..., Z ω(n);in,j n ) = 0 j sχ(1) = i sχ(2), j sχ(2) = i sχ(3),..., j sχ(n 1) = i sχ(n), j sχ(n) = i sχ(1) fail. Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 22 / 30

Bi-R-Cyclic Families and Bi-Free over the Diagonal Theorem (Skoufranis; 2015) Let (A, ϕ) be a non-commutative probability space and let Then the following are equivalent: {[Z k;i,j ]} k I {[Z k;i,j ]} k J M N (A). ({[Z k;i,j ]} k I, {[Z k;i,j ]} k J ) is R-cyclic. ({L([Z k;i,j ])} k I, {R([Z k;i,j ])} k J ) is bi-free from (L(M N (C)), R(M N (C) op )) with amalgamation over D N with respect to F E N. This is a bi-free analogue of a result of Nica, Shlyakhtenko, and Speicher. One of the first non-trivial, concretely constructed examples of bi-freeness with amalgamation. Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 23 / 30

Bi-Free Partial R-Transform - Operator-Valued If (A, E, ε) is a Banach B-B-ncps, b, d B, X A l, and Y A r, let M l X (b) = 1 + n 1 E((L b X ) n ) M r Y (d) = 1 + n 1 E((R d Y ) n ) C l X (b) = 1 + n 1 κ B χ n,0 (L b X,..., L b X ) C r Y (d) = 1 + n 1 κ B χ 0,n (R d Y,..., R d Y ) Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 24 / 30

Bi-Free Partial R-Transform - Operator-Valued If (A, E, ε) is a Banach B-B-ncps, b, db, d B, X A l, and Y A r, let M X,Y (b, db, d) := E((L b X ) n (R d Y ) m R db ) and n,m 0 C X,Y (b, db, d) := db + κ B χ n,0 (L b X,..., L b X, L }{{} b XL db ) n 1 n 1 entries + κ χn,m (L b X,..., L b X, R }{{} d Y,..., R d Y, R }{{} d YR db ). m 1 n entries m 1 entries n 0 Theorem (Skoufranis; 2015) With the above notation, MX l (b)m X,Y (b, db, d) + M X,Y (b, db, d)my r (d) = MX l (b)dbmr Y (d) + C X,Y (MX l (b)b, M X,Y (b, db, d), dmy r (d)). Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 25 / 30

Operator-Valued Free S-Transform If E(X ) and E(Y ) are invertible, let Ψ l,x (b) = M l X (b) 1 = n 1 E((L b X ) n ) Ψ r,y (d) = M r Y (d) 1 = n 1 E((R d Y ) n ) Φ l,x (b) = C l X (b) 1 = n 1 κ B χ n,0 (L b X,..., L b X ) Φ r,y (d) = C r Y (d) 1 = n 1 κ B χ 0,n (R d Y,..., R d Y ) S l X (b) = b 1 (b + 1)Ψ 1 l,x S r Y (b) = b 1 Φ 1 (b) l,x (d) = Φ 1 r,y (d)(d + 1)d 1 = Φ 1 r,y (d)d 1. Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 26 / 30

Operator-Valued Free S-Transform Theorem (Dykema; 2006) Let (A, E, ε) be a Banach B-B-non-commutative probability space, let (X 1, Y 1 ) and (X 2, Y 2 ) be bi-free over B. Assume that E(X k ) and E(Y k ) are invertible. Then S l X 1 X 2 (b) = S l X 2 (b)s l X 1 (S l X 2 (b) 1 bs X2 (b)) and S r Y 1 Y 2 (d) = S r Y 1 (S r Y 2 (d)ds Y2 (d) 1 )S r Y 2 (d) each on a neighbourhood of zero. Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 27 / 30

Operator-Valued Bi-Free S-Transform Let K X,Y (b, db, d) = κ B χ n,m (L b X,..., L b X, R }{{} d Y,..., R d Y, R }{{} d YR db ) n,m 1 n entries m 1 entries ( ) Υ X,Y (b, db, d) = K X,Y bsx l (b), db, S Y r (d)d. Definition (Skoufranis; 2015) The operator-valued bi-free partial S-transform of (X, Y ), denoted S X,Y (b, db, d), is the analytic function db + b 1 Υ X,Y (b, db, d) + Υ X,Y (b, db, d)d 1 + b 1 Υ X,Y (b, db, d)d 1 for any bounded collection of db provided b and d sufficiently small. Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 28 / 30

Operator-Valued Bi-Free S-Transform Formula Theorem (Skoufranis; 2015) If (X 1, Y 1 ) and (X 2, Y 2 ) are bi-free over a unital algebra B, then equals Z l S X1,Y 1 ( Z 1 l S X1 X 2,Y 1 Y 2 (b, db, d) bz l, Z 1 l where Z l = S l X 2 (b) and Z r = S r Y 2 (d). S X2,Y 2 (b, db, d)z 1 r, Z r dz 1 r ) Zr Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 29 / 30

Thanks for Listening! Paul Skoufranis On Operator-Valued Bi-Free Distributions March 22, 2016 30 / 30