Measurements of K- shell production cross-section and fluorescence yield for Y element

Similar documents
DETERMINATION OF X-RAY TOTAL ATTENUATION COEFFICIENT IN Zr, Ag, In FOR ENERGY RANGE BETWEEN kev

CHAPTER-1 PHYSICAL PARAMETERS FOR PROCESSES FOLLOWING INNER-SHELL PHOTOIONIZATION

arxiv: v1 [physics.atom-ph] 23 Dec 2014

X-ray Energy Spectroscopy (XES).

Project Memorandum. N N o. = e (ρx)(µ/ρ) (1)

1 of 5 14/10/ :21

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2012, 4(9): Research Article

Determination of the activity of radionuclides

L x-ray Auorescence cross sections and intensity ratios in some high-z elements excited by and kev photons

Photon and primary electron arithmetics in photoconductors for digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation studies

Within the vast field of atomic physics, collisions of heavy ions with atoms define

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2012, 4(1): Research Article

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2012, 4(9): Research Article

SYNCHROTRON RADIATION INDUCED X-RAY EMISSION - SRIXE W.M. KWIATEK

Geant4 Monte Carlo code application in photon interaction parameter of composite materials and comparison with XCOM and experimental data

FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETER METHOD FOR THE LOW ENERGY REGION INCLUDING CASCADE EFFECT AND PHOTOELECTRON EXCITATION

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 3, March-2014 ISSN

Standardless Analysis by XRF but I don t know what s in my sample!! Dr Colin Slater Applications Scientist, XRF Bruker UK Limited

Quantitative XRF Analysis. algorithms and their practical use

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTE CARLO-LIBRARY LEAST- SQUARES APPROACH TO ENERGY DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS

XRF EXPERIMENTS USING REFRACTION TYPE OF GEOMETRY (2π- GEOMETRY) FOR LOW AND MEDIUM Z ELEMENTS AND COMPOUNDS

Interaction X-rays - Matter

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract

EDS User School. Principles of Electron Beam Microanalysis

Altitude influence of elemental distribution in grass from Rila mountain. Dr. E. Nikolova, Dr. A. Artinyan, S. Nikolova INRNE - BAS XRF Laboratory

MT Electron microscopy Scanning electron microscopy and electron probe microanalysis

Comparison of some human tissues and some commonly used thermoluminescent dosimeters for photon energy absorption

L-shell x-ray production for Rh, Ag, Cd, Sb and I with protons in the energy range from 1.6 to

hν' Φ e - Gamma spectroscopy - Prelab questions 1. What characteristics distinguish x-rays from gamma rays? Is either more intrinsically dangerous?

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)-2

Radiation interaction with matter and energy dispersive x-ray fluorescence analysis (EDXRF)

X-ray Spectroscopy. c David-Alexander Robinson & Pádraig Ó Conbhuí. 14th March 2011

Compton scattering of 662 kev gamma rays proposed by klein-nishina formula

Atomic Physics. Chapter 6 X ray. Jinniu Hu 24/12/ /20/13

USE OF THE MONTE CARLO SIMULATION CODE CEARXRF FOR THE EDXRF INVERSE PROBLEM

X-ray Spectroscopy. Danny Bennett and Maeve Madigan. October 12, 2015

Overview of X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis

PERFORMANCE OF A ROOM TEMPERATURE GAS PROPORTIONAL SCINTILLATION COUNTER IN X-RAY ANALYSIS OF METALLIC ALLOYS EXCITED WITH ALPHA PARTICLES

EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET AND SOFT X-RAY LASERS

Introduction to X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) XPS which makes use of the photoelectric effect, was developed in the mid-1960

print first name print last name print student id grade

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)-2

X-RAY DATA BOOKLET Center for X-ray Optics and Advanced Light Source Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

X-rays. X-ray Radiography - absorption is a function of Z and density. X-ray crystallography. X-ray spectrometry

Radiation Detection for the Beta- Delayed Alpha and Gamma Decay of 20 Na. Ellen Simmons

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Gamma Attenuation of Building Materials

LAB REPORT ON XRF OF POTTERY SAMPLES By BIJOY KRISHNA HALDER Mohammad Arif Ishtiaque Shuvo Jie Hong

THE COMPTON EFFECT Last Revised: January 5, 2007

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ON EFFECT OF COLLIMATOR SIZE ON THE ATTENUATION OF GAMMA RAY IN PURE ELEMENTS

Measurement of linear and mass attenuation coefficient of alcohol soluble compound for gamma rays at energy MeV

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 4: XRF

X-RAY SCATTERING AND MOSELEY S LAW. OBJECTIVE: To investigate Moseley s law using X-ray absorption and to observe X- ray scattering.

GEANT4 Simulations of. the LAXPC Performance. H. M. Antia. Tata Institute of Fundamental Research

Lecture 5. X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopy (XPS)

Effect of Co-60 Single Escape Peak on Detection of Cs-137 in Analysis of Radionuclide from Research Reactor. Abstract

Calculation of atomic radiations in nuclear decay BrIccEmis and beyond

INTRODUCTION TO MEDICAL PHYSICS 1 Quiz #1 Solutions October 6, 2017

Pt L X-RAYS PRODUCTION CROSS SECTIONS BY 12 C, 16 O, 32 S AND 48 Ti ION-BEAMS IN THE MeV/u ENERGY RANGE *

Lβ 1 satellites in X-ray emission spectra of 4d transition elements

Investigation of radiative proton-capture reactions using high-resolution g-ray spectroscopy

Constraints on Neutrino Electromagnetic Properties via Atomic Ionizations with Germanium Detectors at sub-kev Sensitivities

Detecting high energy photons. Interactions of photons with matter Properties of detectors (with examples)

An Introduction to Diffraction and Scattering. School of Chemistry The University of Sydney

CALCULATION OF THE DETECTOR-CONTRIBUTION TO ZIRCONIUM PEAKS IN EDXRF SPECTRA OBTAINED WITH A SI-DRIFT DETECTOR

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

Benchmark Tests of Gamma-Ray Production Data in JENDL-3 for Some Important Nuclides

Chapter 1. In all the measurements/investigations involving basic. phenomenological study as well as application of X-ray emission, the

Neutron detection efficiency from the 7 Li(p,n) reaction (R405n)

Charge state distributions after sub-shells ionization in Lead atom

Gamma-ray spectroscopy with the scintillator/photomultiplierand with the high purity Ge detector: Compton scattering, photoeffect, and pair production

Quartz-Crystal Spectrometer for the Analysis of Plutonium K X-Rays

Multi Channel Analyzer (MCA) Analyzing a Gamma spectrum

CHARGED PARTICLE INTERACTIONS

THE USE OF WAVEFORM DIGITIZERS WITH SOLID STATE DETECTORS FOR SPECTROSCOPIC APPLICATIONS. Carly Jean Smith

5) Surface photoelectron spectroscopy. For MChem, Spring, Dr. Qiao Chen (room 3R506) University of Sussex.

XRF books: Analytical Chemistry, Kellner/Mermet/Otto/etc. 3 rd year XRF Spectroscopy Dr. Alan Ryder (R222, Physical Chemistry) 2 lectures:

CALCULATION METHODS OF X-RAY SPECTRA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PIGE, PIXE AND NAA ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF MINOR ELEMENTS IN STEELS

Radiation Detection and Measurement

arxiv: v2 [nucl-ex] 4 Mar 2018

Sample Spectroscopy System Hardware

Radhakrishnan B*, Kurup P G G**, Ramakrishnan G***, Chandralingam S****

Nuclear Lifetimes. = (Eq. 1) (Eq. 2)

Inelastic soft x-ray scattering, fluorescence and elastic radiation

Comparative Analysis of Nuclear Cross Sections in Monte Carlo Methods for Medical Physics Applications

Generation of X-Rays in the SEM specimen

MT Electron microscopy Scanning electron microscopy and electron probe microanalysis

Gamma-ray spectroscopy with the scintillator/photomultiplierand with the high purity Ge detector: Compton scattering, photoeffect, and pair production

Application of positrons in materials research

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research

Particles and Waves Particles Waves

INTERACTIONS OF RADIATION WITH MATTER

X-RAY SPECTRA. Theory:

X-ray Satellites Spectra in the L 1 Region of 4d Transition Elements

The GEANT Low Energy Compton Scattering (GLECS) Package for use in Simulating Advanced Compton Telescopes

X-ray Fluorescence Imaging Following Synchrotron Beam Excitation

GAMMA RAY SPECTROSCOPY

Detection and measurement of gamma-radiation by gammaspectroscopy

Experimental Activities in China

Transcription:

American Journal of Physics and Applications 2015; 3(1): 1-5 Published online January 29, 2015 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ajpa) doi: 10.11648/j.ajpa.20150301.11 ISSN: 2330-4286 (Print); ISSN: 2330-4308 (Online) Measurements of - shell production cross-section and fluorescence yield for Y element Hamza Tunç 1, Rafet Yilmaz 2, *, Abdullah Ozkartal 2, Turgay Ozmen 1 1 Institute of Sciences, Yuzuncu Yıl University, Van, Turkey 2 Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences and Arts, Yuzuncu Yıl University, Van, Turkey Email address: hamza-tunc23@hotmail.com (H. Tunç), ryilmaz@yyu.edu.tr (R. Yilmaz), abdullahozkartal@yyu.edu.tr (A. Ozkartal), turgay333@hotmail.com (T.Ozmen) To cite this article: Hamza Tunç, Rafet Yilmaz, Abdullah Ozkartal, Turgay Ozmen. Measurements of - shell Production Cross-Section and Fluorescence Yield for Y Element. American Journal of Physics and Applications. Vol. 3, No. 1, 2015, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpa.20150301.11 Abstract: - shell X- ray production cross-section have been measured for Y element. Measurements have been carried out at 16.896 kev excitation energy using secondary source. X-rays emitted by samples have been counted by a Si(Li) detector with 160 ev resolution at 5.9 kev. The values of - shell fluorescence yield has been evaluated for Y element. The results obtained for fluorescence yield and X- ray production cross-section has been compared with the theoretically calculated values and other available semiempirical fits values. eywords: X-Ray Fluorescence, Fluorescence Yields, Cross-Sections 1. Introduction X-ray production cross-sections ( σ α) and fluorescence yields ( ω ) are important in a variety of fields such as atomic physics, nuclear physics, space physics, plasma physics, elemental analysis by X- ray emission technique, medical research, industrial processing. The de-excitation of an atom with an inner-shell vacancy can proceed either by emission of an X-ray photon or by the ejection of Auger electrons. The de-excitation of an atomic shell is characterized by these fluorescence yields and is defined as the probability that a vacancy in the -shell is filled through a radiative transition. X-ray production cross-sections and fluorescence yields for different elements have been investigated for many years. Earlier experimental X-ray production cross-sections have been measured [1,2]. X-ray production cross-sections have been determined theoretically for all the elements at energies ranging from 10 to 60 kev [3]. -shell X-ray production cross-sections and fluorescence yields have been investigated for different elements [4,5,6]. shell fluorescence yields for different elements have been investigated for many years. Bambynek et al. have fitted their collection of selected most reliable experimental values in the 13 Z 92 range[7]. rause present a table of ω adopted values for elements 5 Z 110 by using all theoretical and experimental data on the parameter contributing to the -shell fluorescence yields[8]. Hubbel et al. have compiled more recent experimental values[9]. Theoretical values of ω were obtained using the Hartree- Fock-Slater model [10]. ostroun et al. present computations for elements in the range 10 Z 70 [11]. -shell fluorescence yields have been investigated for different elements [12,13,14]. shell X-ray production cross-sections and fluorescence yields for Cr, Mn, Fe and Co elements have been measured using secondary source by Yılmaz [15]. There is scarcely experimental -shell fluorescence yield data for 39 Y. The purpose of this study is to examine in low energy the X-ray production cross-section of 39 Y. Measurements of fluorescence yilds for elements at various photoionization energies are important because of their widespread use. In the present study, measurements have been carried out at 16.896 kev. shell has been excited by the X-rays of the secondary source excited by 59.5 kev photons emitted by the primary source. - shell fluorescence yields were obtain by using the measured cross-sections, the theoretical photoionization cross-sections, and fractional X-ray emission rates. The results obtained for X-ray production cross-sections and fluorescence yields are compared with the theoretically calculated values and other available

2 Hamza Tunç et al.: Measurements of - shell Production Cross-Section and Fluorescence Yield for 39 Y Element semiempirical values. 2. Experimental The geometry and the shielding arrangement of the experimental set-up employed in the present work are as shown in Fig.1. Also, it is available in our previous study [16]. As shown in Fig. 1., the sample (target) was placed at a 45 0 angle with respect to the direct beam from secondary source excited by 59.5 kev photons emitted by the primary source. The samples were excited by the X-rays of secondary source excited at 59.5 kev γ - rays from a 241 Am point source. The X-ray spectra from target was recorded by a calibrated Si(Li) X-ray spectrometer (full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) =160 ev at 5.96 kev, active area = 12.5 mm 2, sensitivity depth = 3.5 cm, Be window thickness = 12.5µm) coupled to a Nuclear Data MCA system (ND66B) consisting of a 4096- channel analyzer and spectroscopy amplifier. The net peak areas of the X-rays of each target were determined after background subtraction, escape-peak corrections [17]. The secondary excitation source was pure Nb (99.99%). The excitation energy was taken as average of α and X-ray energies. For Nb, weighted averages α,, α energies are 16.584 kev, 18.661 ev and 16.896 kev, respectively [18]. Fig. 1. Experimental set-up used for measurements of production cross-section and yields. Fig. 2. A typical X-ray spectrum for 39 Y. 3. Data Analysis The -shell X-ray production cross-section ( σ α) required for the determination of shell fluorescence yield was evaluated by measuring the characteristic X- ray intensities for 39 Y. The experimental X-ray production cross-sections were measured using the relation. σ i = Ni I Gε t (1) where N i( i = α, ) is the number of counts per unit time under the corresponding photopeak. A typical X-ray 0 i

American Journal of Physics and Applications 2015; 3(1): 1-5 3 spectrum for 39 Y is shown in Fig.2. I 0 exciting radiation, G is the geometricall factor, εiis the detector efficiency for the i X-rays, t iss the mass of the sample in g /cm 2 and is the self-absorption correction factor for the incident photons and emittedd X-ray photons. is the calculated by using the relation[15], 1 exp[ ( µ 1/sinθ + µ 2 /sin θ)] t = ( µ /sin θ + µ /sinn θ) t 1 2 is the intensity of where µ 1 and µ 2 are the absorption coefficients (cm 2 /g) of incident photons and emitted characteristic X-Rays, respectively [9]. The angle of incident photons and emitted X-rays, with respect to the normal at the surface of the sample, (2) θ was equal to 45 0 in the present set-up In the present study, as shown in Fig 3, the values of the factors I 0 εg, which contain terms related to the incident photon flux, geometrical factor and the efficiency of the X-ray detector, were determined by collecting the X-ray spectra of thin samples of Fe, Ga, Se, Sr and Zr, in the same geometry in which the X- ray fluorescence cross-sections were measured and using the equation [19]. N i I0Gε i = σ t i where N i, and t are as in Eq.(1). (3) Fig. 3. I 0εG vs. X- ray energy. 4. Theoretical Method The theoretical values of X-ray production cross-section σ has been calculated using the following equation [5], α P σ α p = σ(e) ωf α (4) Where σ (E) is the -shell photoionization cross-section for the given element at excitation energy E, ωis the -shell fluorescence yield and f α is fractional X-ray emission rate for α X-rays and are defined as where Iα f α = ( 1+ I / I α (5) I / is the to α X-ray intensity ratio. In the present calculations, the values of σ (E) were taken from Scofield [20] based on Hartree-Slater potential theory, and the P ) 1 values of ω were taken from the tables of rause[8]. I / values based on relativitic Hartree-Slater potential Iα theory were used for the evaluation of theoretical X-ray cross-sections [21].5. Results and Discussion The experimental values of shell X-ray production cross-section for 39 Y at 16.896 kev is listed in Table 1 together with the theoeretical value obtained using Eq.(4). The overall error in the present measurements is estimated to be <8%. This error is the quadrature sum of the uncertainties in the different parameters used to deduce X-ray production cross-sections, namely, the error in the area evaluation under the α and X-ray peak (2%), in the self-absorption correction factor ratio (<1%), the product I 0 εg(5%) and the other error in the non-uniform thickness(<1%). In this work, in order to reduce the absorption, thin sample was also used as the target. In order to reduce the statistical error, the spectra was recorded and about 6000 counts were collected under the α peak. It can be seen from Table 1 that our measured value is in good

4 Hamza Tunç et al.: Measurements of - shell Production Cross-Section and Fluorescence Yield for 39 Y Element agreement, within the experimental uncertainties, with the calculated theoretical value.. The agreement between the presently measured shell X-ray production cross-section and theoretical prediction is within % 3 for 39 Y element. Table 1. Experimental and theoretical α X- ray cross-sections (barns/atom) for 39 Y. Element Excitation energy (kev) Present Work Theoretical predictions 39 Y 16.896 6002±468 6187.863 The present measured value of -shell fluoresans yield( ω ), deduced using Eq.(4) for 39 Y is compared with the other available calculated values, and semiempirical fits in Tables 2,3. In this study,our experimental result agree to the experimental result agree to <3.9% for 39 Y element with The -shell fluorescence yields calculated using a semiemprical expression by Hubbell et al.[9], Bambynek et al., [7] and rause et al. [8]. The present measurement is in good agreement with the semiempirical values deduced by Hubbell et al.[9], with 0.4% (Table 3). Table 2. Comparison of the present shell fluorescence yield ( ω ) and theoretical values for 39 Y. Element Present work Walters [10] ostroun [11] 39 Y 0.688±0.053 0.742 0.722 Table 3. Present experimental result and semiempirical fits values of ω for 39 Yb Element Present work Bambynek [7] Hubbell [9] rause [8] 39 Y 0.688±0.053 0.7155 0.685 0.710 As a result, the present agreement between the theoretical and present experimental values lead to the conclusion that the data presented here will benefit for analytical purpose and satisfactory for many other appilications employing the fundemental parameter approach. Also, secondary source are quite useful in low energy studies. References [1] Garg, L., Mehta, D., umar, S., Mangal, P.C., Trehan, P.N., 1985. Energy dependence of photon-induced α and X-ray fluorescence crosss-sections for some elements with 20 Z 56. X-ray Spectrom. 14, 165-169. [2] Rao. D. V., Cesereo, R. and Gigante, G. E. (1993d). Photon-excited X ray fluorescence cross-sections for some light elements in the range 20-60 kev. X-ray Spectrom. 22, 406. [3] rause, M.O., Nester, C. V., Sparks Jr., C.J., Ricci, E., 1978. X-ray fluorescence cross-sections for and L X-rays of elements. Oak Ridge national laboratory, Report ORNL 5399. [4] umar, S., Singh, S., Mehta, D., Singh, N., Mangal, P.C., Trehan, P. N., 1987. Measurement of -shell fluorescence cross-sections for some elements with 23 Z 55 in the energy range 8-60 kev, X- ray Spectrom. 16, 203-206. [5] Durak, R., Erzenoğlu S., urucu Y. and Şahin Y., 1998. Measurement of photon-induced X-ray production cross-sections for some elements with 40 Z 70 at 122 kev. Radiation Physics and Chemistry.51, 45-48. [6] Özdemir, Y., Durak, R., Öz. E., 2002. shell X- ray fluorescence cross-sections and fluorescence yields in some medium-z elements. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 65, 199-204. [7] Bambynek, W., Crasemann, B., Fink, R. W., Freund, H.U., Mark, H., Swift, C.D., Price, R.E., Rao, P.V., 1972. X-ray fluorescence yields, Auger and Coster-ronig transitions probabilities. Rev. Mod.phys. 44, 716-813 [8] rause, M.O., 1979. Atomic radiative and radiationless yields for and L shell. J.Phys.Chem. Ref.Data 8, 307-327 [9] Hubbell, J.H., and Seltzer, S. M., 1995. Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy absorption coefficients 1 kev to 20 MeV for elements Z=1 to 92 and 48 additional substance of dosimetric interest. NISTIR 5632. [10] Walters, D.L., Bhalla, C. P., 1971. Nonrelativistik Auger rates, X-rays rates, and fluorescence yields for the shell. Phys. Rev. A 3, 1919-1927. [11] ostroun, V.O., Chen, M. H., Crasemann, B., 1971. Atomic radiation transition probabilities to the is state and theoretical - shell fluorescence yields. Phys. Rev. A 3, 533-545. [12] Arora, S.., Allawadhi,.L., Sood, B.S., 1981, Measurement of -shell fluorescence in elements 28 Z 53, Physica B, C 111C, 71-75. [13] Pious, J.., Balakrishna,.M., Lingappa, N., Siddappa,., 1992. Total fluorescence yields for Fe, Cu, Zn, Ge and Mo, J. Phys. B:Atom. Mol. Opt. Phys. 24, 1155-1160. [14] Şimşek, Ö., Yılmaz, D., aragöz, M. Ertuğrul, 2002, Measurement of -shell fluorescence cross sections and shell fluorescence yields for the atomic region 22 Z 64 by 59.5 kev photons. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 253, 143-147. [15] Yılmaz, R., 2014. Measurements of shell X-ray production cross-sections and fluorescence yields for Cr, Mn, Fe and Co elements. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 96, 1-4.

American Journal of Physics and Applications 2015; 3(1): 1-5 5 [16] Yılmaz, R., 2012. Measurements of L 2,3 subshells X-ray production cross-sections and average L 2,3 subshells fluorescence yield values of some elements in the atomic number range 70 Z 78. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 81,1539-1542 [17] Öz E., 2006. Determination of emission probabilities of Auger electrons and -L shell radiative vacancy transfer probabilities for 17 elements from Mn to Mo at 59.5 kev. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer 97, 41-50 [18] Storm, E., Israel, I., 1970.Photons cross-sections from 1 kev to 100 MeV for elements Z=1 to Z=100. Nuclear Data Tables A 7, 565-681. [19] Durak, R., Özdemir, Y., 2001. Measurement of -shell fluorescence cross-sections and yields of 14 elements in the atomic number range 25 Z 47 using photoionization. Radiation Physics and Chemistry.61, 19-25. [20] Scofield, J.H., 1973. Theoretical photoionisation cross-sections from 1 to 1500 kev. Report UCRL 51326, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, CA. [21] Scofield, J.H., 1974. Relativistic Hartree-Slater values for and L X-ray emission rates. Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tables 14, 121-137.