Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Vol 7(56), No Series III: Mathematics, Informatics, Physics, 1-12

Similar documents
FINSLERIAN HYPERSURFACES AND RANDERS CONFORMAL CHANGE OF A FINSLER METRIC

ON HYPER SURFACE OF A FINSLER SPACE WITH AN EXPONENTIAL - METRIC OF ORDER M

HYPERSURFACE OF A FINSLER SPACE WITH DEFORMED BERWALD-MATSUMOTO METRIC

On Einstein Kropina change of m-th root Finsler metrics

Acta Mathematica Academiae Paedagogicae Nyíregyháziensis 24 (2008), ISSN

RANDERS METRICS WITH SPECIAL CURVATURE PROPERTIES

Research Article On a Hypersurface of a Finsler Space with Randers Change of Matsumoto Metric

Lagrange Spaces with β-change

ON RANDERS CHANGE OF GENERALIZED mth ROOT METRIC

On the rectifiability condition of a second order differential equation in special Finsler spaces

5.2 The Levi-Civita Connection on Surfaces. 1 Parallel transport of vector fields on a surface M

International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 48 No , A STUDY OF HYPERSURFACES ON SPECIAL FINSLER SPACES

ON RANDERS SPACES OF CONSTANT CURVATURE

PAijpam.eu NONHOLONOMIC FRAMES FOR A FINSLER SPACE WITH GENERAL (α, β)-metric

On Randers-Conformal Change of Finsler Space with Special (α, β)-metrics

Two dimensional manifolds

A local characterization for constant curvature metrics in 2-dimensional Lorentz manifolds

Mathematical Journal of Okayama University

Acta Mathematica Academiae Paedagogicae Nyíregyháziensis 25 (2009), ISSN

Acta Mathematica Academiae Paedagogicae Nyíregyháziensis 24 (2008), ISSN

MATH DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. Contents

Conformal transformation between some Finsler Einstein spaces

ON THE FOLIATION OF SPACE-TIME BY CONSTANT MEAN CURVATURE HYPERSURFACES

On homogeneous Randers spaces with Douglas or naturally reductive metrics

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 21 Dec 2017

NEW LIFTS OF SASAKI TYPE OF THE RIEMANNIAN METRICS

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 4. Show that a catenoid and helicoid are locally isometric.

Minimal timelike surfaces in a certain homogeneous Lorentzian 3-manifold II

1 First and second variational formulas for area

NEW TOOLS IN FINSLER GEOMETRY: STRETCH AND RICCI SOLITONS

On Berwald Spaces which Satisfy the Relation Γ k ij = p k g ij for Some Functions p k on TM

Classical differential geometry of two-dimensional surfaces

Chapter 3. Riemannian Manifolds - I. The subject of this thesis is to extend the combinatorial curve reconstruction approach to curves

H-convex Riemannian submanifolds

Arc Length and Riemannian Metric Geometry

Exercise 1 (Formula for connection 1-forms) Using the first structure equation, show that

GENERALIZED NULL SCROLLS IN THE n-dimensional LORENTZIAN SPACE. 1. Introduction

The Explicit Construction of Einstein Finsler Metrics with Non-Constant Flag Curvature

On a class of Douglas metrics

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

Coordinate Finite Type Rotational Surfaces in Euclidean Spaces

On Douglas Metrics. Xinyue Chen and Zhongmin Shen. February 2, 2005

Tensor Analysis in Euclidean Space

Legendre surfaces whose mean curvature vectors are eigenvectors of the Laplace operator

A CHARACTERIZATION OF WARPED PRODUCT PSEUDO-SLANT SUBMANIFOLDS IN NEARLY COSYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS

Part IB GEOMETRY (Lent 2016): Example Sheet 1

d F = (df E 3 ) E 3. (4.1)

Math 433 Outline for Final Examination

Non-Degenerate Quadric Surfaces in Euclidean 3-Space

A brief introduction to Semi-Riemannian geometry and general relativity. Hans Ringström

CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARIES

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

Draft version September 15, 2015

Curved Spacetime I. Dr. Naylor

William P. Thurston. The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds

Math 5378, Differential Geometry Solutions to practice questions for Test 2

MATH 4030 Differential Geometry Lecture Notes Part 4 last revised on December 4, Elementary tensor calculus

On the geometry of higher order Lagrange spaces.

CS 468, Lecture 11: Covariant Differentiation

Syllabus. May 3, Special relativity 1. 2 Differential geometry 3

Chapter 5. The Second Fundamental Form

RICCI CURVATURE OF SUBMANIFOLDS IN SASAKIAN SPACE FORMS

2.8 Linear Approximations and Differentials

THEODORE VORONOV DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. Spring 2009

Einstein Toolkit Workshop. Joshua Faber Apr

1. (a) (5 points) Find the unit tangent and unit normal vectors T and N to the curve. r (t) = 3 cos t, 0, 3 sin t, r ( 3π

A Note on Cohomology of a Riemannian Manifold

Chapter 7 Curved Spacetime and General Covariance

Übungen zu RT2 SS (4) Show that (any) contraction of a (p, q) - tensor results in a (p 1, q 1) - tensor.

2.12: Derivatives of Exp/Log (cont d) and 2.15: Antiderivatives and Initial Value Problems

Exact Solutions of the Einstein Equations

Introduction to Differential Equations

Ph236 Homework 4 Solutions

Find the indicated derivative. 1) Find y(4) if y = 3 sin x. A) y(4) = 3 cos x B) y(4) = 3 sin x C) y(4) = - 3 cos x D) y(4) = - 3 sin x

4.7 The Levi-Civita connection and parallel transport

Notes on Cartan s Method of Moving Frames

Chaotic Modeling and Simulation (CMSIM) : , Geodesics Revisited. Pavel Pokorny

Theorem. In terms of the coordinate frame, the Levi-Civita connection is given by:

Is there a magnification paradox in gravitational lensing?

going vertically down, L 2 going horizontal. Observer O' outside the lift. Cut the lift wire lift accelerates wrt

RIEMANNIAN SUBMERSIONS NEED NOT PRESERVE POSITIVE RICCI CURVATURE

Complex and real hypersurfaces of locally conformal Kähler manifolds

Homogeneous Geodesics of Left Invariant Randers Metrics on a Three-Dimensional Lie Group

SCREEN TRANSVERSAL LIGHTLIKE SUBMANIFOLDS OF INDEFINITE KENMOTSU MANIFOLDS

ν(u, v) = N(u, v) G(r(u, v)) E r(u,v) 3.

is constant [3]. In a recent work, T. IKAWA proved the following theorem for helices on a Lorentzian submanifold [1].

Part IB Geometry. Theorems. Based on lectures by A. G. Kovalev Notes taken by Dexter Chua. Lent 2016

Math 6455 Nov 1, Differential Geometry I Fall 2006, Georgia Tech

Course Summary Math 211

The existence of light-like homogeneous geodesics in homogeneous Lorentzian manifolds. Sao Paulo, 2013

Diffusion Processes and Dimensionality Reduction on Manifolds

(a) The points (3, 1, 2) and ( 1, 3, 4) are the endpoints of a diameter of a sphere.

Chapter 12. Connections on Manifolds

Lecture 8. Connections

COHOMOLOGY OF FOLIATED FINSLER MANIFOLDS. Adelina MANEA 1

CHARACTERIZATION OF TOTALLY GEODESIC SUBMANIFOLDS IN TERMS OF FRENET CURVES HIROMASA TANABE. Received October 4, 2005; revised October 26, 2005

On constant isotropic submanifold by generalized null cubic

Mathematics (Course B) Lent Term 2005 Examples Sheet 2

Math 1310 Final Exam

Chapter 3 Differentiation Rules (continued)

Transcription:

Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Vol 7(56), No. 1-2014 Series III: Mathematics, Informatics, Physics, 1-12 EQUATION GEODESIC IN A TWO-DIMENSIONAL FINSLER SPACE WITH SPECIAL (α, β)-metric V. K. CHAUBEY 1, Arunima MISHRA 2 and U. P. SINGH 3 Abstract In the year 1997 and 1998 Matsumoto And Park obtained the equations of geodesic in a two-dimensional Randers, Kropina and Matsumoto space. In 2011, Chaubey, Prasad and Tripathi obtained the equation of geodesic for a more general (α, β)-metric as compared to Randers, Kropina and Matsumoto mertric. In the continuation of the above paper, here we have found out the equation of geodesic for the well known metric L = α + β2 α, L = β2 α and special Matsumoto metric L = L = in the different figures. β2 (β α). The main results are illustrated 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 53B20, 53B40, 53C60. Key words: (α, β)-metric, geodesic, two-dimensional Finsler space. 1 Indroduction In 1997 Matsumoto and Park [6] obtained the equation of geodesic in twodimensional Finsler spaces with the Randers metric (L = α + β) and the Kropina metric (L = α2 β ) whereas in 1998 they [7] obtained the equation of geodesic in twodimensional Finsler space with the slope metrics, i.e. Matsumoto metric given by (L = α2 (α β)). In 2011 Chaubey, Prasad and Tripathi [2] obtained the equation of geodesic for a more general (α, β)-metric (L = k 1α 2 +k 2 αβ+k 3 β 2 a 1 α+a 2 β where a s and k s are constants) by considering β as an infinitesimal of degree one and neglecting infinitesimals of degree more or equal to two they obtained the geodesics of twodimensional Finsler space in the form y = f(x, y, y ), where (x, y) are co-ordinate of two-dimensional Finsler space. 1 Department of Applied Sciences, Ansal Technical Campus, Lucknow (U.P.)-226030, INDIA, e-mail: vkcoct@gmail.com 2 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur (U.P.)- 273009, INDIA, e-mail: arunima16oct@hotmail.com 3 Department of Applied Sciences, Ansal Technical Campus, Lucknow (U.P.)-226030, INDIA, e-mail: upsingh@live.in

2 V. K. Chaubey, Arunima Mishra and U. P. Singh In the present paper we have shown that under the same conditions, the geodesic of the two-dimensional space with following metrics: L = α + β2 α (1) and L = L = β2 α β2 (β α) All the above three metrics are studied in detail by the authors of the papers [1, 3, 4, 5]. 2 Preliminaries We consider a two-dimensional Finsler space F 2 = (M 2, L(x, y)) with the (α, β)-metric [6, 7] where α = a ij (x)x i x j is a Riemannian metric and β = b i (x)y i is one form on M 2. The space F 2 = (M 2, α) is said to be a Riemannian space associated to F 2. Matsumoto and Park [6, 7] constructed the problem on the following consideration : (I). The underlying manifold M 2 is thought of as a surface S of the ordinary 3-space with an orthonormal co-ordinate system X α, α = 1, 2, 3, which by the parametric equation X α = X α (x 1, x 2 ). Then S is equipped with the induced Riemannian metric α. Thus two tangent vector fields B i, i = 1, 2, are given with the components Bi α = Xα and then a x i ij = α Bα i Bα j. Let N = N α be the unit normal vector to S. An isothermal co-ordinate system x i = (x, y) in S may be referred in which α is of the form α = ae, where a = a(x, y) is a positive-valued function and E = ẋ 2 + ẏ 2. Then the Christoffel symbols γjk i (x, y) of S in xi are given by (γ11 1, γ1 12, γ1 22 ; γ2 11, γ2 12, γ2 22 )= ( ax a, ay a, ax a, ay a, ax a, ay a ). We shall denote by (; ) the covariant differentiation with respect to Christoffel symbols in R 2. (II). Let B = B α be a constant vector field in the ambient 3-space and put (2) (3) B = b i B i + b 0 N (4) along S. Then the tangential component of B gives the linear form β = b i ẋ i, b i = a ij b j (5) The Gauss-Weingarten derivation formulae lead from (4) to

Equation geodesic in a two-dimensional Finsler space 3 B ;j = (b i ;j B i + b i H ij N) + (b 0 ; N b 0 H i j B i) where H ij is the second fundamental tensor of S and H ij = a ik H k j. From B ;j = 0, we get b i ;j = b0 H i j, that is b i;j = b 0 H ij (6) Consequently we have b i;j = b j;i that is b 1y = b 2x and hence b i is a gradient vector field in S. (III.) The linear form β was originally to be induced one by the Finslerian surface S due to the earth s gravity [6]. Hence, it is assumed here that the constant vector field B is parallel to the X 3 -axis, i.e. B a = (0, 0, G), G = const. > 0. Therefore (4) gives G 2 = a ij b i b j + (b 0 ) 2. Since (a 11, a 12, a 22 ) = (a 2, 0, a 2 ), we have ( G a )2 = (b 1 ) 2 + (b 2 ) 2 + ( b0 a )2 We shall regard the quantity G a as an infinitesimal of degree one, and neglect the infinitesimal of degree more or equal to two. It is natural from the above that b 1, b 2 and b0 a are also those of degree one. Further (6) shows that β ;0 a = b i;jẋ i ẋ j a may be regarded as an infinitesimal of degree one. Consequently λ = β a 2, µ = γ a 2, ν = β ;0 a (7) are infinitesimals of degree one where γ = b 1 ẏ b 2 ẋ. Thus we have summarized all the above three conditions as: I. α is the induced Riemannian metric in a surface S and, in particular α = ae. II. β is the linear form in ẋ i, induced from a constant vector field (0, 0, -G) by (4) and (5). III. λ, µ and ν of (7) are regarded as infinitesimals of degree one and infinitesimals of degree more or equal to two are neglected. 3 Geodesics of the special (α, β)-metric Matsumoto and Park [6] obtained the differential equation of the geodesic in an isothermal co-ordinate system (x i ) = (x, y) for the (α, β)-metric is as follows: (L α + aewγ 2 )Ri(C) β ;0 a 2 wγ L β (b 1 y b 2 x) = 0 (8) where w = Lαα β 2 = L αβ αβ = L ββ α 2 and Ri(C) = a(ẋÿ ẏẍ) E 3 + (axẏ ayẋ) E

4 V. K. Chaubey, Arunima Mishra and U. P. Singh It is remarked that the equation Ri(C)=0 gives the geodesic of the associated Riemannian space. Now according to the above contribution, equation (8) may be written for the metric L = α + β2 α in the form (1 a2 λ 2 + 2a2 µ 2 )Ri(C) = 2a2 µν E 2 E 2 E 3 Let us neglect the infinitesimals of degree more or equal to two. Then we have Ri(C) = 2a2 µν E 3 (9) Therefore, on our construction, we obtain the approximate equation of geodesics in the form y = 2β ;0 γ a 2 E 2 (a x y a y ) (10) a where y = dy dx, E = 1 + y 2, γ = b 1 y b 2 (11) β ;0 = b 1;1 + (b 1;2 + b 2;1 )y + b 2;2 (y ) 2 Next, if we take the metric (2) then the differential equation (8) of geodesic is written as ( a2 λ 2 + 2a2 µ 2 )Ri(C) = a2 µν E 2 E 2 E 3 Let us neglect the infinitesimals of degree more or equal to two. Then we have µν Ri(C) = E(2µ 2 λ 2 (12) ) Therefore on our construction, we obtain the approximate equation of geodesics in the form β y ;0 = γ E 2 (2b 2 1 b2 2 )(y ) 2 + (2b 2 2 b2 1 ) 6b E 2 (a x y a y ) (13) 1b 2 y a where β ;0, γ, E and y are given in 11. Next, if we take the metric (3) then the differential equation (8) of geodesic is written as (λ 2 (1 aλ E ) + 2µ2 )Ri(C) = µν E Let us neglect the infinitesimals of degree more than two. Then we have µν Ri(C) = E(2µ 2 + λ 2 ) Therefore on our construction, we obtain the approximate equation of geodesics in the form β y ;0 = γ E 2 (2b 2 1 + b2 2 )(y ) 2 + (2b 2 2 + b2 1 ) 2b E 2 (a x y a y ) (15) 1b 2 y a where β ;0, γ, E and y are given in 11. (14)

Equation geodesic in a two-dimensional Finsler space 5 4 Some Examples In the following we shall use the notation as follows: (X a ) = (X, Y, Z), (x i ) = (x, y) Example 1: We consider the circular cylinder S : X 2 + Z 2 = 1, is also written as Y = y, which S : X = cos x, Y = y, Z = sin x Then we get B 1 = ( sin x, 0, cos x), B 2 = (0, 1, 0), N = (cos x, 0, sin x) (a 11, a 12, a 22 ) = (1, 0, 1), (b 1, b 2, b 0 ) = (G cos x, 0, G sin x) Consequently we have α 2 = dx 2 + dy 2, β = G cos x dx Therefore (10) gives the approximate differential equation of geodesic for the metric (1) in the given condition of above example as which has the solution where A and B are constants of integration. y + tan x y = 0 (16) y = A sin x + B (17) Further from (13) the approximate differential equation of geodesic for the metric (2) in the given condition of Example 1 is given by y + tan x (1 + y 2 ) 2y 2 1 = 0 (18) solving the above equation with the help of Mathematica software we have y = x where f 1 (t) = 2t 3 tan 1 t. 1 [f 1 1 {A + log(cos u)}]du + B (19) Again from (15) the approximate differential equation of geodesic for the metric (3) in the given condition of Example 1 is given by y + tan x (1 + y 2 ) 2y 2 + 1 = 0 (20)

6 V. K. Chaubey, Arunima Mishra and U. P. Singh solving the above equation with the help of Mathematica software we have y = x where f 2 (t) = 2t tan 1 t. 1 [f 1 2 {A + log(sec u)}]du + B (21) Next we are interested in revolution surfaces the axis of which is parallel to the constant vector field B. Such a surface S is given by, X = g(u) cos y, Y = g(u) sin y, Z = f(u) Denoting (u, y) by (x i ), we have B 1 = (g cos y, g i sin y, f ), B 2 = ( g sin y, g cos y, 0) N = ( f cos y, f sin y, g ) F, F = f 2 + g 2 (a 11, a 12, a 22 ) = (F 2, 0, G 2 ), (b 1, b 2, b 0 ) = ( Gf Gg F, 0, F ), Consequently we get (b 1, b 2 ) = (Gf, 0) α 2 = F 2 du 2 + g 2 dy 2, β = Gf du We need an isothermal co-ordinate system, if we take F x = du (22) g Then we obtain α 2 = g(u) 2 (dx 2 + dy 2 ), β = G f g F (23) Example 2: We shall deal with the sphere, surface of constant curvature +1 : g(u) = cos u and f(u) = sin u. Then F = 1 and (22) gives x = 1 cos u du = 1 1+sin u 2 log 1 sin u Then 1+sin u 1 sin u = e2x 1 implies leads to cos u = cosh u, hence du = dx cosh x. Consequently (23) α 2 = 1 cosh 2 x (dx2 + dy 2 ), β = G cosh 2 x dx Therefore (1) gives the approximate differential equation of geodesics in the form y = tanh x(1 2G2 cosh 2 x )(y + (y ) 3 ) (24)

Equation geodesic in a two-dimensional Finsler space 7 The solution of the above equation with the help of Mathematica software is given by y = x 1 4e 2t e (1+e 2t ) 2 +A t (1 + e 2t ) 1 e 2{ 4e 2t (1+e 2t ) 2 +A t+log(1+e2t )} dt (25) Again (2) gives the approximate differential equation of geodesics in the form y = tanh x (y 1)(2y + 1)(y 2 + 1) 2y 2 1 The solution of the above equation with the help of Mathematica software is given by y = x 1 [f 1 4 (26) {A + log(cosh t)}]du + B (27) where f 4 (t) = 2 tan 1 u 10 + 1 2 3 6 (log(1 u)) + 15 log(1 + 2u) 20 log(1 + u2 ). Again (3) gives the approximate differential equation of geodesics in the form y = tanh x (y 1)(2y + 1)(y 2 + 1) 2y 2 + 1 The solution of the above equation with the help of Mathematica software is given by y = x 1 [f 1 5 (28) {A + log(cosh t)}]du + B (29) where f 5 (t) = 3 tan 1 u 10 + 1 2 (log(1 u)) + 2 1 5 log(1 + 2u) 20 log(1 + u2 ). 5 Results and Discussions On the basis of the above calculations we have following important propositions: Proposition 1. The solution of equation of the geodesic for the Finsler metric (1) in a circular cylinder S : X 2 + Z 2 = 1, Y = y is given by equation (17). Proposition 2. The solution of equation of the geodesic for the Finsler metric (2) in a circular cylinder S : X 2 + Z 2 = 1, Y = y is given by equation (19). Proposition 3. The solution of equation of the geodesic for the Finsler metric (3) in a circular cylinder S : X 2 + Z 2 = 1, Y = y is given by equation (21). Proposition 4. The solution of equation of the geodesic for the Finsler metric (1) in a sphere, surface of constant curvature +1 : g(u) = cos u and f(u) = sin u is given by equation (25).

8 V. K. Chaubey, Arunima Mishra and U. P. Singh Proposition 5. The solution of equation of the geodesic for the Finsler metric (2) in a sphere, surface of constant curvature +1 : g(u) = cos u and f(u) = sin u is given by equation (27). Proposition 6. The solution of equation of the geodesic for the Finsler metric (3) in a sphere, surface of constant curvature +1 : g(u) = cos u and f(u) = sin u is given by equation (29). As it can be observed from all of the above solutions of equation of geodesics in Propositions 5.1 to 5.6, the nature of the solution is governed a lot by the first constant of integration A, whereas the second constant of integration B is just a shifting parameter. Therefore, the behavior of the curves has been plotted for different values of A and taking B=0 without a loss of generality. As the analytic solutions in Propositions 5.1 to 5.6 are complex in nature, the plots have been drawn using Mathematica 7.0. Fig. 1 The solution of the equation of geodesic for the Finsler metric (1) in a circular cylinder S : X 2 + Z 2 = 1, Y = y behaves like sine curve.

Equation geodesic in a two-dimensional Finsler space 9 Fig. 2 The solution of the equation of geodesic for the Finsler metric (2) in a circular cylinder S : X 2 + Z 2 = 1, Y = y behaves like the above figure. Fig. 3 The solution of the equation of geodesic for the Finsler metric (3) in a circular cylinder S : X 2 + Z 2 = 1, Y = y behaves like the above figure.

10 V. K. Chaubey, Arunima Mishra and U. P. Singh Fig. 4 The solution of the equation of geodesic for the Finsler metric (1) in the sphere, surface of constant curvature +1 : g(u) = cos u and f(u) = sin u and at G=1, behaves like the above figure. Fig. 5 The solution of the equation of geodesic for the Finsler metric (2) in the sphere, surface of constant curvature +1 : g(u) = cos u and f(u) = sin u behaves like the above figure.

Equation geodesic in a two-dimensional Finsler space 11 Fig. 6 The solution of the equation of geodesic for the Finsler metric (3) in the sphere, surface of constant curvature +1 : g(u) = cos u and f(u) = sin u behaves like the above figure. References [1] Antonelli, P. L., Ingarden, R. S. and Matsumoto, M.: The theory of sprays and Finsler spaces with applications in physics and biology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1993. [2] Chaubey, V. K., Prasad, B. N. and Tripathi, D. D.: Equations of geodesic for a (α, β)-metric in a two-dimensional Finsler space, J. Math. Comput. Sci., 3 (2013), No. 3, 863-872. [3] Mishra, Padmdeo: A study of inverse problem in special Finsler spaces, Ph. D. thesis, D.D.U. Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, India 2007, 90-106. [4] Matsumoto, M.: A slope of mountain is a Finsler surface with respect to a time measure, J. Math. Kyoto Univ., 29, (1989), 17-25. [5] Matsumoto, M.: Foundation of Finsler geometry and special Finsler spaces, Kaisesisha Press, Otsu, Japan, 1986. [6] Matsumoto, M. and Park, H. S.: Equations of geodesics in two-dimensional Finsler spaces with (α, β)-metric, Rev. Roum. Pures. Appl., 42, (1997), 787-793. [7] Matsumoto, M. and Park, H. S.: Equations of geodesics in two-dimensional Finsler spaces with (α, β)-metric-ii, Tensor, N. S., 60, (1998), 89-93.

12 V. K. Chaubey, Arunima Mishra and U. P. Singh