Diffraction Physics at LHCb Michael Schmelling LHCb / MPI for Nuclear Physics The LHCb Experiment Energy Flow Central Exclusive Production New Developments Summary Diffraction Physis at LHCb M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 1
1. THE LHCb EXPERIMENT 69 institutes 16 countries 1132 members Diffraction Physis at LHCb - The LHCb Experiment M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 2
Detector layout and performance bwd acc. 4 < η < 1.5 Diffraction Physis at LHCb - The LHCb Experiment M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 3
Angular coverage of the LHC experiments ALICE central forward muon coverage ATLAS & CMS central detectors LHCb forward detector tracking, particle-id and calorimetry in full acceptance Diffraction Physis at LHCb - The LHCb Experiment M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 4
LHCb Tracking 1.2 T Magnet long and downstream tracks: used for physics measurements proper momentum measurement (best resolution for long tracks) VELO tracks: (primary) vertex reconstruction large angular acceptance 4 < < 1:5 and 1:5 < < 5 upstream tracks: subset of VELO tracks with hits in TT T-tracks: only found in T-stations (partly from secondary interactions) Diffraction Physis at LHCb - The LHCb Experiment M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 5
The VErtex LOcator (VELO) LHCb subsystem with largest angular coverage VELO silicon sensors RF-foil 1m 21 r & 2 r-only stations outside of magnetic field no momentum measurement forward and backward coverage blind in central region 1 m x cross section at y=0: z 390 mrad 60 mrad 15 mrad Interaction region σ = 5.3cm Diffraction Physis at LHCb - The LHCb Experiment M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 6
Inelastic pp Interactions classification of pp-interactions Notes: differentiation of inelastic cross section according to color exchange (color octet, gluon): non-diffractive processes no color exchange (color singlet, pomeron): elastic & diffractive scattering no acceptance for elastic scattering with LHCb Diffraction Physis at LHCb - The LHCb Experiment M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 7
Discussion inelastic processes are not truly distinguishable example: pp-event with single diffractive signature one proton is scattered quasi-elastically, OR both protons are broken up & fragmentation generates a forward proton PYTHIA approach: cross sections for different processes inel = ja SD1 j 2 + ja SD2 j 2 + ja DD j 2 + ja DPE j 2 + ja ND j 2 alternative view: amplitudes for different processes inel = ja SD1 + A SD2 + A DD + A DPE + A ND j 2 comments: interference terms small in some regions of phase space experimental cuts allow to probe contributions by certain amplitudes leading protons, large rapidity gaps: color singlet amplitudes large multiplicities, large range in : color octet amplitudes rigorous separation of diffractive & non-diffractive processes impossible Diffraction Physis at LHCb - The LHCb Experiment M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 8
2. ENERGY FLOW Energy Flow (EF): average energy per event in a given -interval EF : 1 de 1 N int d = 0 @ 1 NX part ; N int i=1 E i ; part of underlying event sensitive to multi-parton interactions & parton radiation comparison to PYTHIA 6, PYTHIA 8 and cosmic ray models (generators used to model cosmic ray induced air showers) 1 A analysis for different event classes: inclusive minimum bias: 1 tracks with 2 [1:9; 4:9] and p > 2 GeV/c hard scattering: inclusive && 1 tracks with p T > 3 GeV/c diffractive enriched: inclusive && 0 tracks with 2 [ 3:5; 1:5] non-diffractive enriched: inclusive && 1 tracks with 2 [ 3:5; 1:5] Diffraction Physis at LHCb - Energy Flow M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 9
Energy Flow: data vs PYTHIA (charged+neutral)ef Energy Flow increases with momentum transfer EF diff < EF incl < EF ndiff < EF hard highest sensitivity at large uncertainties: dominated by systematics smallest at large PYTHIA 6: Energy Flow is overestimated at small underestimated at large PYTHIA 8.135 default: except for hard scattering the Energy Flow is well described for all samples de/dη [GeV] Total 1/N int MC/Data de/dη [GeV] Total 1/N int MC/Data 250 200 150 100 50 0 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 80 60 40 20 Data PYTHIA6 LHCb PYTHIA6 Perugia 0 PYTHIA6 Perugia NOCR PYTHIA 8.135 default inclusive minbias events LHCb s=7 TeV 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Systematic Uncertainty 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 100 Data PYTHIA6 LHCb PYTHIA 8.130 diffractive PYTHIA 8.135 default diffractive enriched events LHCb s=7 TeV 0 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Systematic Uncertainty 1.5 1 0.5 inclusive diffr. 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 de/dη [GeV] Total 1/N int MC/Data 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1.4 Data PYTHIA6 LHCb PYTHIA6 Perugia 0 PYTHIA6 Perugia NOCR PYTHIA 8.135 default hard scattering events LHCb s=7 TeV 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Systematic Uncertainty 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 η 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 de/dη [GeV] Total 1/N int MC/Data 250 200 150 100 50 0 1.4 hard Data PYTHIA6 LHCb PYTHIA6 Perugia 0 PYTHIA6 Perugia NOCR PYTHIA 8.135 default non-diffractive enriched events non-diffr. LHCb s=7 TeV 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Systematic Uncertainty 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 η 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 η η Eur.Phys.J.C73(2013)2421 Diffraction Physis at LHCb - Energy Flow M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 10
Energy Flow: data vs cosmic ray models models not tuned to LHC EPOS & SIBYLL: good description of EF for inclusive and non-diffractive events QGSJET models: overestimated EF for inclusive and non-diffractive events; good description of hard scattering best description by SIBYLL de/dη [GeV] Total 1/N int MC/Data de/dη [GeV] Total 1/N int 250 200 150 100 50 0 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 Data EPOS 1.99 QGSJET01 QGSJETII-03 SIBYLL 2.1 inclusive minbias events inclusive LHCb s=7 TeV 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Systematic Uncertainty 3.5 4 4.5 2 2.5 3 100 Data EPOS 1.99 QGSJET01 80 QGSJETII-03 SIBYLL 2.1 diffractive enriched events 60 diffr. 40 20 LHCb s=7 TeV de/dη [GeV] Total 1/N int MC/Data 500 Data EPOS 1.99 QGSJET01 400 QGSJETII-03 SIBYLL 2.1 hard scattering events 300 hard 200 100 LHCb s=7 TeV 0 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Systematic Uncertainty 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 η 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 de/dη [GeV] Total 1/N int 250 200 150 100 50 Data EPOS 1.99 QGSJET01 QGSJETII-03 SIBYLL 2.1 non-diffractive enriched events non-diffr. LHCb s=7 TeV η Eur.Phys.J.C73(2013)2421 all models underestimate the EF of diffractive events MC/Data 0 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 1.5 Systematic Uncertainty 1 MC/Data 0 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Systematic Uncertainty 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.5 0.6 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 η 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 η Diffraction Physis at LHCb - Energy Flow M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 11
3. CENTRAL EXCLUSIVE PRODUCTION contributing processes QED photo production double pomeron exchange di-muon or di-muon plus photon final states (for c ) in the following focus on di-muon final states Diffraction Physis at LHCb - Central Exclusive Production M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 12
Experimental aspects use VELO to veto non-exclusive processes note that some background will remain: : : Diffraction Physis at LHCb - Central Exclusive Production M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 13
Event displays compare pp! Z ()X and CEP J = production clean experimental signatures very low multiplicities at TeV centre-of-mass energies! Diffraction Physis at LHCb - Central Exclusive Production M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 14
Exclusive di-muon invariant mass spectrum JPG 41(2014)055002 clear mass peaks of J = and (2S ) exponentially falling QED background Diffraction Physis at LHCb - Central Exclusive Production M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 15
Transverse momentum spectra disentangle exclusive and non-exclusive components J = (2S ) JPG 41(2014)055002 superposition of two exponentials - Regge theory inspired d=dt e bt soft component: CEP hard component: normal QCD fitted slopes consistent with expectations extrapolated from HERA J = : b CEP = 5:70 0:11 GeV 2, b non excl = 0:97 0:04 GeV 2 (2S ): b CEP = 5:1 0:7 GeV 2, b non excl = 0:8 0:2 GeV 2 Diffraction Physis at LHCb - Central Exclusive Production M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 16
Rapidity dependence compare data to theoretical predictions JPG 41(2014)055002 data and predictions agree within uncertainties NLO calculations are preferred Diffraction Physis at LHCb - Central Exclusive Production M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 17
Photo-production cross-section theoretical description d dy pp!pj = p = r+k+ dn dk+ p!j = p(w+) + r k dn dk p!j = p(w ) left-hand side measured by LHCb two targets for producing the J = LHCb cross-sections proportional to gap survival probability r photon flux dn=dk sensitivity to gluon PDF g(x ) 2 HERA measurement: p!j = p(w ) = 81 0:67 W nb 90GeV take p!j = p(w ) from HERA and solve for p!j = p(w ) Diffraction Physis at LHCb - Central Exclusive Production M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 18
Comparison to HERA results JPG 41(2014)055002 LHCb data enter twice significant extension of kinematic range qualitative description by power law works evidence for deviation from simple power law NLO contributions (?) Diffraction Physis at LHCb - Central Exclusive Production M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 19
Double J = production surprise discovery initially not expected a posteriori reasonable well theoretically understood Diffraction Physis at LHCb - Central Exclusive Production M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 20
Double J = mass spectra JPG 41(2014)115002 PLB707(2012)52 JPG 41(2014)115002 clean experimental signal di-j = mass spectra similar in CEP and inclusive production Diffraction Physis at LHCb - Central Exclusive Production M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 21
Extraction of the exclusive part disentangle components via p T spectrum JPG 41(2014)115002 42 13% exclusive contribution additional large uncertainties from modelling the non-exclusive part Diffraction Physis at LHCb - Central Exclusive Production M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 22
4. NEW DEVELOPMENTS HeRSCheL: High Rapidity Shower Counters for LHCb forward scintillators for selecting rapidity gaps up to 114 m from IP central region not covered gap size 2 < < 8 huge gain for diffractive physics and central exclusive production (e.g. J = photoproduction on the proton in pa) p T > 0:5 GeV/c p T > 1:5 GeV/c LHCb simulation results for the efficiency to see charged pions Diffraction Physis at LHCb - New Developments M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 23
Fixed target physics with LHCb Ü SMOG: System for Measuring Overlap with Gas possibility to inject (noble) gases: Ne or He, Ar, Kr (under discussion) fixed target physics in pa and PbA configuration Diffraction Physis at LHCb - New Developments M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 24
Nucleus-nucleus interactions first look at PbNe collisions using data from O(10) min running entries/(1 MeV/c 2 ) 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 LHCb preliminary PbNe-interactions - work in progress 0 KS 0 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 m(π + π - ) [MeV/c 2 ] entries/(0.5 MeV/c 2 ) 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 s NN =54.4 GeV LHCb preliminary work in progress physics potential: explore nuclear structure at large x conditions between SPS and RHIC for QGP studies Λ,Λ 1100 1105 1110 1115 1120 1125 1130 1135 1140 m(pπ -,pπ + )[MeV/c 2 ] Diffraction Physis at LHCb - New Developments M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 25
Links to other communities cosmic ray physics and cosmology understanding of extensive air showers MC tuning understanding the AMS antiproton/proton ratio use fixed target measurements to clarify: QCD or Dark Matter annihilation Diffraction Physis at LHCb - New Developments M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 26
5. SUMMARY diffraction physics is an integral part of the LHCb physics portfolio results from RunI Energy Flow measurements study diffractive particle production results on single and double charmonium production in CEP CEP results from p-pb collisions in the pipeline prospects for LHC RunII improved detector for diffractive physics more data in pp and p-pb new centre-of-mass energies new developments further enlarge the physics program fixed target physics Pb-Pb collisions Diffraction Physis at LHCb - Summary M. Schmelling, Heidelberg, July 20, 2015 27