Toxicity of Insecticides to Predators of Rice Brown Planthoppers~ Nilaparvata lugens (Stal) (Homoptera: Delphacidae)

Similar documents
Ovicidal Activity of Insecticides Against Planthoppers 1 on Rice 2

Determination of Economic Threshold level (ETL) of brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens Stal. population in different stages of rice crop at Raipur

Functional response of the predators mirid bug and wolf spider against white-backed planthopper, Sogatella furcifera (Horvath)

Brown planthopper: THREAT TO RICE PRODUCTION IN ASIA

Residual effect of two insecticides and neem oil against epilachna beetle, Epilachna vigintioctopunctata (Fab.) on bitter gourd

REACTION OF RICE LANDRACES AGAINST BROWN PLANTHOPPER NILAPARVATA LUGENS STAL.

Parasitism of Brown Planthopper and Whitebacked Planthopper by Agamermis unka in Korea

Mode of Feeding and Growth of Nephotettix virescens (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) on Selected Resistant and Susceptible Rice Varieties

Evaluation of Contact and Residual Activity of Selected Insecticides for Control of Rice Stink Bug. Beaumont, TX

Levels of Resistance to the Whitebacked Planthopper, Sogatella furcifera (Homoptera: Delphacidae), in Rice Varieties with Different Resistance Genes 1

Introduction. Visarto Preap*, Myron P. Zalucki, Gary C. Jahn l. and Harry J. Nesbite

Development and Mechanism of Insecticide Resistance in Rice Brown Planthoppers Selected with Malathion and MTMC

Efficiency of Mycoinsecticides Controlling Pest Populations of the Brown Planthopper in Rice. A Simulation Model

Rice planthopper problems and relevant causes in China

SUSCEPTIBILITY OF PREDATORY STINK BUG Podisus nigrispinus (DALLAS) (HETEROPTERA: PENTATOMIDAE) TO GAMMA CYHALOTHRIN

2014 Ryan Lawn and Tree Overseeding Evaluation. University of Nebraska-Lincoln & Kansas State University. Zac Reicher, Jared Hoyle, and Matt Sousek

Influence of different nitrogen levels on the management of Bt cotton sucking pests

Functional benefits of predator species diversity depend on prey identity

Screening of Rice Genotypes for Resistance to the Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens Stål

Bentgrass and Fineleaf Fescue Cultivar and Species Differences in Phytotoxicity to Mesotrione

Economic thresholds, nature of damage, and losses caused by the brown planthopper

Iowa State University. From the SelectedWorks of Bryony C. Bonning

Forecasting brown planthopper outbreaks in Japan

Soybean Insecticide Screening Test 1 Field north of TRIA house Beaumont, TX 2014 I II III IV

Monitoring Trends in Insecticide Resistance of Field Populations of Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) in Guizhou Province, China,

6 2 Insects and plants

Facilitating biological control of insect pests on ornamental crops

Identification of antibiosis and tolerance in rice varieties carrying brown planthopper resistance genes

DEVELOPMENT OF TILAPIA FOR SALINE WATERS IN THE PHILIPPINES

THE LIFE HISTORY AND CONSUMPTION HABITS OF CYRTORHINUS LIVIDIPENNIS REUTER (HEMIPTERA: MIRIDAE)l

Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with resistance to brown planthopper in the indica rice cultivar Col.

Abstract. Introduction

J JUL - 25-JUL 2016 HOUSEHOLD FINANCES RESEARCH

Growth Behavior of Pineapple cv. Mauritius under Integrated Nutrient Management in Northern part of West Bengal, India

Available online at ScienceDirect. Rice Science, 2016, 23(2):

Integrated Pest Management in rice

Variation of pre-ovipositional period in the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens, collected in tropical, subtropical and temperate Asia

2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 1

White flies and their natural enemies. Moshe cohen Bio-bee Sde Eliyahu Ltd. October 2015

Resistance Management an update on R&D

Advanced Digital Design with the Verilog HDL, Second Edition Michael D. Ciletti Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, 2011

Research Article. Purti 1 *, Rinku 1 and Anuradha 2

Minute Pirate Bug: A Beneficial Generalist Insect Predator

FUNCTIONAL AND NUMERICAL RESPONSE OF Paederus fuscipes CURTIS AGAINST Nilaparvata lugens STALL AND THEIR SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION IN THE RICE FIELDS

Predation and Competition of Two Predators (Pardosa pseudoannulata and Verania lineata) on Different Densities of Nilaparvata lugens in Laboratory

By the end of this lesson, you should be able to

Ecological Modelling 137 (2001)

Biology and management of dodder a new threat to the canola industry

MAJOR PEST INSECTS RESISTANCE TO INSECTICIDES IN OILSEED RAPE PLANTATIONS IN POLAND AND RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

Seasonal incidence and control of black fly (Aleurocanthus rugosa Singh) infesting betelvine (Piper betle L)

Rice Planthoppers in the Past Half Century in China

Experimental location Land type Soil type ph. K (meq/100) Jute Agriculture Experimental Station (JAES), Manikgonj, BJRI

Pyrethroid Concentrations in Surface Water and Bed Sediment in High Agricultural Use Regions of California. Keith Starner and K.

Shou-Horng HUANG, 1,2 Ching-Huan CHENG, 2 Chiou-Nan CHEN, 1 Wen-Jer WU 1,3 and Akira OTUKA 4, *

Studies on varietal resistance to the brown planthopper in Taiwan

Strategies to Optimize Thrips Control in the Klamath Basin

Integrated Pest Management Program Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture UConn Extension

Dr. Oscar E. Liburd. Professor of Fruit & Vegetable Entomology

Onion Research at Fruita CO, 2002

Factors that potentially mediate the ecological host range of Trissolcus japonicus

Centre de Recherche en Horticulture, Laval University, Quebec, Canada 2

Towards a system of non-chemical flower Thrips control in strawberry production

Key words: Biological parameters, Amphibolus venator Predator, Stored insect pests

Pesticides and Pollinators. A look at modern neurotoxins

Lecture 8 Insect ecology and balance of life

Biochemical Basis of Resistance in Rice against Brown and White Backed Planthopper

Sharpshooter & Whiteflies: What s New in Ornamental Research

Effect of Weather Parameters on Population Dynamics of Paddy Pests

PREVENTING DECOMPOSITION OF AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS BY ALKALINE HYDROLYSIS IN THE SPRAY TANK

Bioefficacy and Phytotoxicity of Alanto 240 SC (Thiacloprid 240 SC) against Thrips and Natural Enemies in Pomegranate

Protecting Pollinators in Home Lawns and Landscapes

ACCURACY OF MODELS FOR PREDICTING PHENOLOGY OF BLACKHEADED FIREWORM AND IMPLICATIONS FOR IMPROVED PEST MANAGEMENT

Integrated Pest Management. Larry A. Sagers Utah State University Extension Regional Horticulturist

Paramere Morphology of Two Colormorphs of the Brown Planthopper Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) (Homoptera: Delphacidae)

Analytical Test Report 10

Studies of varietal resistance in rice to the brown planthopper at the International Rice Research Institute

COVARIANCE ANALYSIS. Rajender Parsad and V.K. Gupta I.A.S.R.I., Library Avenue, New Delhi

Lysiphlebus fabarum (Marshall) (Hym.: Aphidiidae)

Tree and Shrub Insects

Biophysical Basis of Resistance against Shoot Bug (Peregrinus maidis) in Different Genotypes of Rabi Sorghum

Efficacy of Newer Insecticides Against Sucking Insect Pests of Greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]

Biology of sweet potato weevil, Cylas formicarius F. on sweet potato

IR-4 ORNAMENTAL DATA REPORTING FORM

Evaluation of Insecticides for Control of Insect Pests in an MG VII Soybean Beaumont, TX 2009 Soybean Nursery North No. 4

NATURAL ENEMIES OF THRIPS ON AVOCADO

ROLE OF THE ALLELOPATHY IN MIXED VEGETABLE CROPS IN THE ORGANIC FARMING

New Chemistries for Pest Management

Trial Report: Seedless Watermelon Variety Evaluation 2015

TYPES AND MECHANISMS. Course teacher Dr. A. Prabhuraj Professor Department of Entomology UAS, Raichur

TOXICITY AND RETENTION OF DYE MARKERS TO HETEROTERMES INDICOLA

Enhancement of short wing formation and ovarian growth in the genetically defined macropterous strain of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens

Pesticides Analysis Using the Agilent 5977A Series GC/MSD

Prediction of Long Distance Migration of Rice Planthoppers to Northern Kyushu Considering Low-Level Jet Stream

Polymorphism of the Southern Green Stink Bug Nezara viridula Linnaeus, 1758 (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) In Vietnam

How Do I Get Rid Of Mealybugs?

INVESTIGATING YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENT OF WINTER RAPESEED CULTIVARS AT BOJNORD-IRAN

MEXICAN BROMELIAD WEEVIL REPORT 12 JANUARY 2013

Screening of Castor Genotypes for Resistance Against Green Leafhopper, Empoasca flavescens Fabricius.

Seasonal incidence of major insect pests of okra in the north eastern hill region of India

2 nd International Webinar Conference

Transcription:

Toxicity of Insecticides to Predators of Rice Brown Planthoppers~ Nilaparvata lugens (Stal) (Homoptera: Delphacidae) L. T. F ABELLAR AND E. A. HEINRICHS International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines Environ. Entomol. 13: 832-837 (1984) ABSTRACT Insecticides, at the N. lugens LD.o level, were applied in the Potter's spray tower and as a foliage spray to determine their selective toxicity to predators of N. lugens. These included a mirid bug, Cyrtorhinus lividipennis; the ripple bug, Microvelia atrolineata; and the spider Lycosa pseudoannulata. In the Potter's spray tower test, cypermethrin and deltamethrin were highly toxic to the three predator species on contact. was toxic to C. lividipennis and M. atrolineata when they fed on treated N. lugens prey. and ethylan were not very toxic to the three predators. When the predators were placed on sprayed plants, only deltamethrin was toxic to L. pseudoannulata and M. atrolineata, whereas all of the insecticides were toxic to C. lividipennis, with being the least and deltamethrin the most toxic. Of the commercially available insecticides, acephate,, carbophenothion, and endosulfan were the least toxic to natural enemies. THE BROWN PLANTHOPPER, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal), was formerly a minor pest, but in the 1970s it became a major threat to rice production throughout South and Southeast Asia (Dyck and Thomas 1979). Major means of controlling N. lugens are use of resistant rice varieties and insecticides. Biotype selection has complicated the breeding for rice varieties resistant to N. lugens (Pathak and Heinrichs 1982). Continuous use of insecticides has led to the development of resistance (Nagata and Morita 1974, International Rice Research Institute 1970, 1976). Outbreaks have been associated with the insecticides that cause resurgence of N. lugens populations (Heinrichs et al. 1982b). Resurgence of N. lugens is caused by a combination of several factors, including reproductive stimulation and the destruction of natural enemies (Kiritani et al. 1971, Reissig et al. 1982a). The N. lugens population is normally regulated by predators (Kenmore 1980). Of the 37 predators known to attack N. lugens (Chiu 1979) the mirid bug, Cyrtorhinus lividipennis Reuter; the ripple bug, Microvelia atrolineata (Bergroth); and the spider Lycosa pseudoannulata Boes et Str. are major population-regulating agents (Heinrichs et al. 1982a). Insecticides continue to be an important means of control for several insect pests on rice, but more information is needed regarding their effects on natural enemies in order to minimize resurgence of the pests. The objective of this study was to identify insecticides that are selective, i.e., less toxic to the predators of N. lugens, C. lividipennis, M. atrolineata, and L. pseudoannulata, than to N. lugens. Materials and Methods Determination of the Toxicity and Median Lethal Concentration (LC w ) of Insecticides to N. lugens. The toxicity of 24 insecticides to N. lugens was determined using the Potter's spray tower (Heinrichs et al. 1981). Insecticide dilutions were prepared, based on the Philippine recommended or manufacturer's suggested dosages. Following recommendations of the FAO Working Party of Experts on resistance of pests to pesticides (F AO 1970) we sprayed 2 ml of each insecticide on 20 2- to 3-day-old brachypterous N. lugens adult females, from a greenhouse colony, anaesthetized with CO 2 at a regulated flow rate of 2.5 ml/sec. The insects were then transferred to a petri dish lined with filter paper. The control insects were also anaesthetized and treated with 2 ml of distilled water. Each treatment was replicated three times. Insects were transferred to 2-week-old 'Taichung Native I' (TN1) seedlings covered by mylar cages and randomly arranged in a water pan inside a room with a temperature of 27 ± 2 C, 60 to 80% RH, and a 12-h light period. Mortality was recorded at 1, 4, and 24 h after treatment. Based on their toxicity to N. lugens, several insecticides were selected to represent each of the four classes: four carbamates, four phosphates, two chlorinated hydrocarbons, and two pyrethroids. The LCso values of the 12 insecticides were determined using the Potter's spray tower and foliage spray methods. The LCso of each of the insecticides for N. lugens was the concentration later used in the test to determine the selective toxicity of the insecticides to predators. The Potter's spray 832

June 1984 FA BELLAR AND HEINRICHS: INSECTICIDES AND PREDATORS OF N. lugens 833 tower procedure was similar to that used in the preceding test, except that five concentrations of the insecticides were applied to establish the LC so ' Mortality was recorded 24 h after treatment. In the foliage spray test, the same insecticides, concentrations, numbers of insects, and insects of the same ages were used as in the Potter's test. For each treatment, four potted TN1 plants (25- to 30- day-old) were arranged at equal distances on an electrically operated turntable, and uniformly sprayed at a pressure of 0.70 kg/sq cm with 12.5 ml of the insecticide solution using an atomizer. The control plants were sprayed with water. Sprayed plants were covered by mylar film cages and infested with N. lugens 24 h after spraying. Mortality was recorded 48 h after infestation. The LC so of each insecticide was computed using probit analysis, and was expressed in percent concentration. Toxicity of Insecticides to N. lugens Predators. Following the same procedures as described for the determination of the LC so of the insecticides, the toxicity to predators of N. lugens-adult C. lividipennis, L. pseudoarmulata, and M. atrolineata-was evaluated in Potter's spray tower and foliage spray tests. Three Potter's spray tower tests were conducted. In the first test, mortality of the three predator species was determined when treated predators and untreated predators were placed on plants containing treated N. lugens adults. Each treatment was replicated three times. A replication consisted of 10 cages, each containing one predator and five N. lugens. Predator mortality in the first treatment was due to contact with the insecticides sprayed on the predator, effect of the insecticide as a stomach poison when the predator fed on treated N. lugens, and contact with treated prey. In the second treatment, the effect of the insecticide as a stomach poison, and contact with treated prey, were measured. In the second Potter's spray tower test, the effect of the insecticides on the predatory activity of L. pseudoannulata on N. lugens adults was determined. The experimental design was the same as that in the first test. Predator activity was determined by comparing the N. lugens mortality when treated L. pseudoannulata or untreated L. pseudoannulata were caged with treated N. lugens. In the third Potter's spray tower test, the effect of six insecticides on the predators M. atrolineata and C. lividipennis was determined. Treatments consisted of treated predators and untreated predators caged on plants with treated N. lugens nymphs as prey. To provide for a high level of predator activity, 10 predators were caged with 100 N. lugens nymphs. Each cage represented one replication and each treatment was replicated three times. Mortality was recorded at 48 h after treatment. A foliage spray test was conducted to determine the residual toxicity of 12 insecticides against the three predators. Potted plants placed on a rotating table were sprayed at the N. lugens LC so level. One predator species was caged on a treated plant with five N. lugens adults, which served as prey. Each replication consisted of 10 caged plants. Treatments were replicated three times. Fresh batches of N. lugens and its predators were placed on the plants at 1, 3, and 5 days after spraying. At 48 h after caging, predator mortality was recorded. Predator mortality in this test was caused by direct contact with treated plants, and through feeding on N. lugens which were in contact with the treated plants. The effect of 12 insecticides on the predatory activity of L. pseudoannulata when feeding on N. lugens adults was determined in a foliage spray test. Treatments consisted of five N. lugens adults caged on treated plants without the predators and five N. lugens adults caged on treated plants with one L. pseudoannulata adult. Each replication consisted of 10 caged plants. Treatments were replicated three times. The test was conducted 1 day after treatment and repeated at 3 days after treatment. Results and Discussion Determination of the Toxicity and Median Lethal Concentration (LC so ) of Insecticides for N. lugens. The results of the preliminary test on toxicity of the 24 insecticides to N. lugens indicated that most carbamates are fast-acting, causing high mortality at 4 h after treatment (HT), and most of the organophosphates are slow-acting (Table 1). High toxicity of the carbamate insecticides to three species of planthoppers has been observed in Japan by Fukuda and Nagata (1969). Of the two chlorinated hydrocarbons, endosulfan had a low toxicity; ethylan killed few N. lugens at 1 HT but by 4 HT caused >90% mortality. The four pyrethroids killed few N. lugens and were less toxic than either the carbamates or phosphates. The 12 insecticides selected for further studies are given in order of decreasing toxicity at 24 h after treatment: acephate = azinphos ethyl = = carbofuran = ethylan = carbosulfan = monocrotophos = propoxur = carbophenothion = cypermethrin = deltamethrin = endosulfan. In the foliage spray test, the relative toxicity (LC so ) of the insecticides to N. lugens in decreasing order was cypermethrin > deltamethrin = carbosulfan = carbofuran = ethylan = carbophenothion = monocrotophos = azinphos ethyl = acephate = endosulfan > propoxur > (Table 2). The trend was similar in the Potter's spray tower test except for and propoxur. The relatively high LC so of and propoxur with the foliage spray and the low LC so with the Potter's spray tower suggest that these insecticides are more effective as a direct contact poison than as a foliage spray.

834 ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 13, no. 3 Table 1. Mortality of the brown planthopper, N. tugens, at various h after treatment with insecticides in the Potter's spray tower Insecticide" Mortality (%) 1 HT 4 HT 24 HT loo.oa 93.3a MTMC 48.3c 63.3b 98.3a 26.7d 96.7a Azinphos ethyl 25.Ode 73.3cd 8.3fgh; 91.7ab 13.3efgh 81.7bc Dioxacarb 93.3a 96.7a 98.3a Carbofuran 93.3a 93.3a 93.3ab Fenitrothion 16.7defg 41.7gh 98.3a Chlorpyrifos 6.7fghi 28.3ij 91.7ab Pirimiphos methyl 23.3de 51.7fg 86.7bc Methyl parathion 8.3fghi 41.7gh 76.7cd MIPC 15.0defgh 68.3de 73.3de 38.3c 58.3ef 68.3def 21.7de 40.0h 65.Ocf Ethion 18.3def 36.7hi 58.3fg Methyl parathion b (microencapsulated) 6.7fghi 43.3gh 51.7gh 5.0ghi 13.3kl 38.3ij 26.7d 28.3ij 43.3hi Fenvalerate 8.3fghi 21.7jk 28.3jk Permethrin 3.3hi 15.0kl 23.3k Dioxathion 5.0ghi 5.01 5.01 Control O.Oi 5.01 8.31 Means, within a column, followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05; Duncan's multiple range test). a All insecticides were applied in 2-ml spray solution per petri dish at the concentration of 0.15% except carbofuran which was applied at 0.05% and the pyrethroids cypermethrin, deltamethrin, fenvalerate, and permethrin at 0.006%. b Penncap M. Toxicity of Insecticides to N. lugens Predators. None of the insecticides was toxic to L. pseudoannulata as a stomach poison through ingestion of the treated N. lugens (Table 3). When treated L. pseudoannulata were caged with treated N. lugens, azinphos ethyl, carbofuran, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, and carbosulfan were more toxic to L. pseudoannulata than to N. lugens, causing 60% Table 3. Comparative toxicity of 12 insecticides to treated and untreated predators caged with treated N. tugens adults Insecticides" Azinphos ethyl Carbofuran Azinphos ethyl Carbofuran L. pseudoannulata Predator M. atrolineata C./ividipennis morta Iity (%)b Treated N. lugens + treated predators 6.7de(b) 56.7b(a) O.Ofg(b) 70.0b(b) 96.7a(a) 16.7cdef(c) O.Oe(c) 53.0bc(a) 16.7cd(b) 66.7b(b) 96.7a(a) 13.3cd(c) o.oc(b) 26.7efgh(a) O.Ofg(b) loo.ode(a) 96.7a(a) 40.0b(b) 93.3a(a) (a) loo.oa(a) loo.oa(a) loo.oa(a) loo.oa(a) 36.7c(a) 46.7bcd(a) 3.3defg(b) 20.0d(a) 20.0d(a) 16.7cd(a) 6.7de(b) loo.oa(a) 13.3cde(b) O.Oe(c) 93.3a(a) 23.3bc(b) Treated N. [ugens + untreated predators O.Oe(a) 6.7ij(a) O.Ofg(a) O.Oe(a) 13.3ghi(a) 10.Ocdefg(a) O.Oe(b) 30.0cdef(a) O.Ofg(b) O.Oe(b) 16.7fgi(a) O.Ofg(b) 3.3de(a) 6.7hij(a) O.Ofg(a) O.Oe(b) 26.7defg(a) O.Ofg(b) O.Oe(b) 20.Oefgh(a) O.Oefg(b) O.Oe(c) 46.7bcd(b) 90.0a(a) 3.3de(b) 36.7bcde(a) 10.Ocdef(b) O.Oe(a) 6.7hij(a) 3.3defg(a) O.Oe(b) 26.7defg(a) O.Ofg(b) 3.3de(b) 30.0cdef(a) 3.3defg(b) O.Oe(a) 3.3ij(a) 3.3defg(a) Untreated N. tugens + untreated predators Control O.Oe(a) 3.3j(a) O.Og(a) In a column and in a row (in parentheses), means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05; Duncan's multiple range test). a Applied by Potter's spray tower at the LCso for N. lugens. Mortality readings taken 48 h after treatment. b Analysis based on values transformed to arcsine x 100. mortality. The other insecticides were not toxic as direct contact poisons. was the most toxic (as a stomach poison) to untreated C. lividipennis feeding on Table 2. Median lethal concentration (LCso) of 12 insecticides for N. tugens" Foliage spray Potter's spray Insecticide 95% Fiducial limits 95% Fiducial limits LCso LCso Lower Upper Lower Upper 0.003 0.002 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.006 0.016 0.012 0.020 0.022 0.016 0.038 0.018 0.002 0.028 0.034 0.026 0.040 Carbofuran 0.022 0.020 0.024 0.018 0.016 0.022 0.024 0.022 0.026 0.042 0.034 0.050 Carbophenthion 0.028 0.024 0.030 0.062 0.050 0.072 0.031 0.026 0.036 0.056 0.050 0.064 0.040 0.034 0.046 0.038 0.034 0.044 Azinphos ethyl 0.040 0.030 0.050 0.056 0.048 0.066 0.048 0.042 0.054 0.080 0.068 0.094 0.096 0.082 0.110 0.018 0.014 0.022 0.116 0.102 0.134 0.030 0.022 0.036 a Based on prohit analysis of the average percentage of mortality resulting from five concentrations.

June 1984 FABELLAR AND HEINRICHS: INSECTICIDES AND PREDATORS OF N. lugens 835 Table 4. The effect of inseclicides on the predalory activily of L. pseudoannulata Inseclicide" Azinophos ethyl Carbofurnn Treated N. lugens + treated predator 94.0de 86.0e b 93.3cd 94.0abcd 96.0abcd IOO.Oab N. lugens mortality (%)b Treated N.lugens 28.0g 41.3f 58.Ode 80.0a 40.7f 72.7bc 75.3ab 50.7e 64.0d 60.0d Difference c 66.0** 44.7** 41.3** 17.3** 59.3** 28.0** 21.3** 20.7** 32.0** 46.6** 35.3** 40.0** Azinophos ethyl Carbofuran Treated N. lugens + untreated predator IOO.Oa 96.7bcd b 100.0a 96.7abcd b Treated N.lugens 28.0g 41.3f 58.Ode 80.0a 40.7f 72.7bc 75.3ab 50.7e 64.0d 60.0d 71.3** 58.0** 42.0** 20.0** 56.0** 34.7** 27.3** 24.7** 34.7** 46.0* 36.0* 40.0* Control Untreated N. lugens + untreated predator Untreated N.lugens 8.2h 89.1 Means, within a column, followed by the same leller are not significantly different (P < 0.05: Duncan's multiple range test). " Applied by Poller's spray tower at the LCso for N. lugens adults. Mortality readings taken 48 h after treatment. b Analysis based on values transformed to arcsine x 100. C.*, Highly significant. treated N. lugens, causing 47% mortality. Only acephate, carbophenothion, ethylan, and propoxur treatments were completely safe to C. lividipennis when feeding on treated N. lugens. When treated C. lividipennis were caged with treated N. lugens, azinphos ethyl, carbofuran, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, carbosulfan, monocrotophos, and propoxur were toxic, causing more than 90% C. lividipennis mortality. was least toxic to C. lividipennis, causing only 20% mortality. Untreated M. atrolineata caged with deltamethrin-treated N, lugens incurred 90% mortality, indicating high toxicity of the insecticide as a stomach poison. None of the other insecticides was toxic. When M. atrolineata were treated, both cypermethrin and deltamethrin were highly toxic, causing 100% mortality, whereas acephate, carbophenothion, and endosulfan were not very toxic, causing between 0 and 3% mortality. The results in Table 3 suggest that cypermethrin and deltamethrin have relatively high contact toxicity to the three predator species, causing between 93 and 100% mortality. and ethylan had low toxicity to the three predator species in both caging combinations. Others had differential toxicity, most being highly toxic to C. lividipennis but less toxic to L. pseudoannulata and M. atrolineata. In the second Potter's spray tower test, N. lugens mortality due to predation by L. pseudoannulata was high in all treatments (Table 4). In spite of being treated, L. pseudoannulata significantly increased N. lugens mortality above that of treated N. lugens caged without the predator. The fact that L. pseudoannulata tolerated insecticide treatments and continued its predatory activity was also observed by Chu et al. (1976) with and Unden. For N. lugens caged with the treated predator, the acephate, azinphos ethyl, and carbosulfan treatments resulted in significantly lower N. lugens mortality than the treated N. lugens caged with the untreated predator, indicating toxicity from contact with the insecticides, which decreased the spider's predatory activity. In the third Potter's spray tower test, where N. lugens nymphs rather than adults were used as prey, both treated and untreated C. lividipennis caged with treated N. lugens nymphs had high mortality from deltamethrin (Table 5). thus was toxic both as a contact and a

836 ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 13, no. 3 Table 5. Comparative toxicity of six insecticides to two predators caged with N. lugens nymphs Insecticide" Mortality (% )b C. livid/pennis M. atrolineata Treated N. lugens + treated predators ~~~ _M 3~ Azinophos ethyl 83.3b O.Oe Carbofuran 16.7bcd 76.7a 63.3c 20.0bcd 93.3ab 23,3bc Treated N. lugens + untreated predators 16.7ef O.Oe Azinophos ethyl 20.0ef 6.7de Carbofuran 36.7de 1O.0cde 66.7c 33.3b 23.3def 13.3cd 23.3def 13.3cd Untreated N. lugens + untreated predators Control 10.Of O.Oe Means, within a column, followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05; Duncan's multiple range test), " Applied by Potter's spray tower at the LCso for N. lugens. Mortality readings taken 48 h after treatment. b Analysis based on values transformed to arcsine/(x + 0.5). stomach poison. The other insecticides' had low toxicity as stomach poisons, resulting in C. lividipennis mortality ranging from 17 to 37%. However, when treated C. lividipennis were caged with treated N. lugens all insecticides were toxic, causing mortality ranging from 47 to 100%. had the lowest toxicity, and carbofuran and deltamethrin the highest. When either treated or untreated M. atrolineata were caged with treated N. lugens nymphs, M. atrolineata mortality was highest in the deltamethrin treatment (Table 5). Mortality caused by poisoning from feeding on treated N. lugens was 33%, in comparison to between 0 and 13% for the other insecticides. When deltamethrin-treated M. atrolineata were caged with treated N. lugens, M. atrolineata mortality increased to 77% because of the combination of contact plus stomach poisoning. and azinphos ethyl were not toxic to M. atrolineata. In the foliage spray test, where predators were caged on treated plants, all the insecticides except deltamethrin were not very toxic L. pseudoannulata and M. atrolineata (Table 6). However, all insecticides were toxic to C. lividipennis, mortality ranging from 40 to 100%, 1 day after treatment. was the only insecticide causing ~50% mortality, thus being about equally toxic to N. lugens and C. lividipennis. Toxicity of the insecticides decreased considerably with time, except for deltamethrin, which still caused 83% mortality at 5 days after treatment. Among the three predators, C. lividipennis was the most sensitive to insecticides. This agrees with field studies (International Rice Research Institute 1976) where C. lividipennis was more susceptible to insecticide treatments than L. pseudoannulata. When N. lugens adults were caged on treated plants with L. pseudoannulata, N. lugens mortality at 1 day after treatment was high in all treatments (89-100%) except deltamethrin (55%) (Table 7). greatly decreased spider activity; the control N. lugens adults had 99% mortality. Other insecticides that slightly depressed predatory activity below that shown by animals on untreated control plants 1 day after treatment were cypermethrin, ethylan, and carbosulfan. Spider activity was still depressed by the same four insecticides 3 days after treatment. The results of this study show that there are distinct differences in the toxicity of various insecticides to natural enemies of N. lugens.,, carbophenothion, endosulfan, and ethylan have also been shown to have low toxicity to natural enemies of N. lugens in field tests (Reissig et al. 1982b). It is important to note that these insec- Table 6. Residual toxicily of 12 inseclicides to N. lugens predators when applied as a foliage spray Predator mortality (%) at various days after treatment Insecticide" L. pseudoannulata C. lividipennis M. alrolineata 1 day 3 days 5 days 1 day 3 days 5 days I day 3 days 5 days OOd O,Ob O.Ob 80.0abcd 40.0cde 36.7cd O.Od O.Ob O.Ob Azinophos ethyl 6.7bcd 3.4b O.Ob 86.7abc 60.0bc 56,7bc 6.7cd O.Ob O.Ob O.Od O.Ob O.Ob 40.0g 30.0e 13.3b O.Od O.Ob O.Ob Carbofuran 13.3bc O.Ob O.Ob 86.7abc 56.7bcd 53,3bc O.Od O.Ob o.ob O.Od o.ob O.Ob 66.7def 36.7de 33.3cde O.Od 6.7b O,Ob 16.7b 3Ab O.Ob 83.3abc 66.7b 53,3bc 6.7cd 3.4b O.Ob 3Ad O.Ob O.Ob 50.0fg 40.0cde 36.7cd 20.0b O,Ob O.Ob 93,3a 80,Oa 63.3a 93.3a 83,3a 83.3a 86.7a 53.3a 53.3a 6.7bcd O,Ob O.Ob 53.3efg 36,7de 23.3def 1O.0bc 3.4b 3.4b 3.4cd O,Ob O.Ob 73,3cde 26.7e 16.7ef 10.Oed O.Ob O.Ob 6.7cd O.Ob O.Ob 80.0bcd 70.0ab 66.7ab 3Acd 3.4b O.Ob O.Od O,ob O,Ob 90.0ab 73.3ab 63.3b 20.0b O.Ob O,Ob Control O.Od O,Ob O,Ob O.Oh O.Of O.Of O.Od O.Ob O.Ob Means. within a column, followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05; Duncan's multiple range test). a Applied as foliar spray at the LCso for N. lugens adults.

June 1984 FA BELLAR AND HEINRICHS: INSECTICIDES AND PREDATORS OF N. lugens 837 Table 7. Comparative toxicity of selected insecticides to N. lugens adults when caged on treated plants with or without the predator, L. pseudoannulata Insecticide" N. lugens mortality (%) at various days after treatmenth With Without With Without Differencec predator predator predator predator 3 Difference 98.0a 46.7a 51.3 89.3b 16.7b 72.6 Azinophos ethyl 97.3a 42.7ab 54.6 94.0ab 36.7a 57.3 99.3a 32.7bc 66.6 94.0a 12.7bc 81.3 Carbofuran 98.0a 55.3a 42.7 92.0b 16.7b 75.3 97.3a 44.7a 52.6 94.0ab 15.3b 78.7 91.3b 48.0a 43.3 90.7b 26.0a 64.7 89.3b 27.3c 62.0 77.3c 14.7b 62.6 54.7c 34.7bc 20.0 56.od 20.7b 35.3 l00.0a 46.7a 53.3 96.0a 18.7b 77.3 88.7b 46.7a 42.0 90.0b 16.7b 73.3 98.7a 38.7bc 60.0 90.0b 17.3b 72.7 97.3a 28.7bc 68.6 86.0bc 18.0b 68.0 Control 99.2a 3.3d 96.0 96.0 3.3d 92.7 Means, within a column, followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05; Duncan's multiple range test). a Applied as a foliage spray at the LCso for N. lugens adults. c, Highly significant. ticides have not been shown to cause N. lugens resurgence., however, which is highly toxic to natural enemies of N. lugens, is the most active among the many resurgence-inducing insecticides (Heinrichs et al. 1982b, Reissig et al. 1982b). Although reproductive stimulation at sublethal doses is considered to be a major cause of N. lugens resurgence (Heinrichs et al. 1982a, Reissig et al. 1982b), evidence indicates that insecticide toxicity to natural enemies is a contributing factor, especially in resistant rice varieties where predator Iprey ratios are low (Reissig et al 1982a). The selective toxicity of the commercial insecticides tested in this study should be more fully exploited in the management of rice insect pests, especially in locations having potential for N. lugens outbreaks. References Cited Chiu, S. C, 1979. Biological control of the brown planthopper, pp. 335-355. In Brown plant hopper: threat to rice production in Asia. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines. Chu, Y. I., C. C. Ho, and B. J. Chen. 1976. The effect of and Unden on the predation of Lycosa spider (Lycosa pseudoannulata). Plant Prot. Bull. (Taiwan) 8: 42-57 (in Chinese, English summary). Dyck, V. A., and B. Thomas. 1979. The brown planthopper problem, pp. 3-17. In Brown planthopper: threat to rice production in Asia. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines. Food and Agriculture Organization. 1970. Recommended methods for the detection and measurement of resistance of agricultural pests to pesticides. F AO Plant Prot. Bull. 18: 53-56. Kukuda, H., and T. Nagata. 1969. Selective toxicity of several insecticides on three planthoppers. Jp. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 13: 142-149 (in Japanese, English summary). Heinrichs, E. A., S. Chelliah, S. R. Pickin, S. L. Valencia, L. T. FabellaI', M. B. Arceo, and G. B. Aquino. 1981. A manual of methods on insecticide evaluation in rice. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines. Heinrichs, E. A., G. B. Aquino, S. Chelliah, S. L. Valencia, and W. H. Reissig. 1982a. Resurgence of Nilaparvata lugens (Stal) populations as influenced by method and timing of insecticide applications in lowland rice. Environ. Entomol. 11: 78-84. Heinrichs, E. A., W. H. Reissig, S. Valencia, and S. Chelliah. 1982b. Rates and effect of resurgenceinducing insecticides on populations of Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera:.Delphacidae) and its predators. Ibid. 11: 1269-1273. International Rice Research Institute. 1970. Annual report for 1969. Los Banos, Philippines. 1976. Annual report for 1975. Los Banos, Philippines. Kenmore, P. K. 1980. Ecology and outbreaks of a tropical insect pest of the green revolution, the rice brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal). Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. Kiritani, K., S. Kawahara, T. Sasaba, and F. Nakasuji. 1971. An approach to the integrated control of rice pests: control with selective low dosage insecticides by reduced number of applications. Jp. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 16: 28-40. Nagata, T., and S. Morita. 1974. Resistance in the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens StAl. Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 18: 73-80 (in Japanese, English summary). Pathak, P. K., and E. A. Heinrichs. 1982. Selection of biotype populations 2 and 3 of Nilaparvata lugens by exposure to resistant rice varieties. Environ. Entomol. 11: 85-90. Reissig, W. H., E. A. Heinrichs, and S. L. Valencia. 1982a. Insecticide-induced resurgence of the brown planthopper, Nilaparoota lugens on rice varieties with different levels of resistance. Ibid. 11: 165-168. Reissig, W. H., E. A. Heinrichs, and S. L. Valencia. 1982b. Effects of insecticides on Nilaparvata lugens and its predators: spiders, Microvelia atrolineata and Cyrtorhinus lividipennis. Ibid. 11: 193-199. Received for publication 20 July 1983; accepted 28 February 1984.