If we have many sets of populations, we may compare the means of populations in each set with one experiment.

Similar documents
Analysis of Variance and Design of Experiments-I

Statistics For Economics & Business

Chap The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Fractional Factorial Designs

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel Chapter 10 ANOVA and Other C-Sample Tests With Numerical Data

Two-Factor Full Factorial Design with Replications

STAT 506: Randomized complete block designs

Factorial ANOVA. Psychology 3256

Allow the investigation of the effects of a number of variables on some response

Chapter 8: Hypothesis Testing Lecture 9: Likelihood ratio tests

Multiple Comparisons. The Interaction Effects of more than two factors in an analysis of variance experiment. Submitted by: Anna Pashley

Theorem A: Expectations of Sums of Squares Under the two-way ANOVA model, E(X i X) 2 = (µ i µ) 2 + n 1 n σ2

Two-Way Analysis of Variance - no interaction

Factorial designs. Experiments

MAT3378 ANOVA Summary

Summary of Chapter 7 (Sections ) and Chapter 8 (Section 8.1)

ANOVA Randomized Block Design

2 k, 2 k r and 2 k-p Factorial Designs

Factorial Designs. Prof. Daniel A. Menasce Dept. of fcomputer Science George Mason University. studied simultaneously.

Chapter 11: Factorial Designs

Chapter 15: Analysis of Variance

Outline Topic 21 - Two Factor ANOVA

3. Design Experiments and Variance Analysis

Ch. 1: Data and Distributions

We like to capture and represent the relationship between a set of possible causes and their response, by using a statistical predictive model.

Two or more categorical predictors. 2.1 Two fixed effects

Statistical Analysis of Unreplicated Factorial Designs Using Contrasts

CHAPTER 4 Analysis of Variance. One-way ANOVA Two-way ANOVA i) Two way ANOVA without replication ii) Two way ANOVA with replication

CS 5014: Research Methods in Computer Science

CS 5014: Research Methods in Computer Science. Experimental Design. Potential Pitfalls. One-Factor (Again) Clifford A. Shaffer.

Two Factor Completely Between Subjects Analysis of Variance. 2/12/01 Two-Factor ANOVA, Between Subjects 1

Dr. Shalabh Department of Mathematics and Statistics Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

1 DV is normally distributed in the population for each level of the within-subjects factor 2 The population variances of the difference scores

Econ 3790: Business and Economic Statistics. Instructor: Yogesh Uppal

1 The Randomized Block Design

Factorial and Unbalanced Analysis of Variance

CS 147: Computer Systems Performance Analysis

Topic 9: Factorial treatment structures. Introduction. Terminology. Example of a 2x2 factorial

Unbalanced Data in Factorials Types I, II, III SS Part 1

TWO OR MORE RANDOM EFFECTS. The two-way complete model for two random effects:

Increasing precision by partitioning the error sum of squares: Blocking: SSE (CRD) à SSB + SSE (RCBD) Contrasts: SST à (t 1) orthogonal contrasts

Chapter 8 Student Lecture Notes 8-1. Department of Economics. Business Statistics. Chapter 12 Chi-square test of independence & Analysis of Variance

Homework 3 - Solution

Notes for Week 13 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) continued WEEK 13 page 1

SIMPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS. Business Statistics

STAT Final Practice Problems

Department of Economics. Business Statistics. Chapter 12 Chi-square test of independence & Analysis of Variance ECON 509. Dr.

Chapter 10. Design of Experiments and Analysis of Variance

AN IMPROVEMENT TO THE ALIGNED RANK STATISTIC

Two-factor studies. STAT 525 Chapter 19 and 20. Professor Olga Vitek

Chapter 14 Student Lecture Notes Department of Quantitative Methods & Information Systems. Business Statistics. Chapter 14 Multiple Regression

Definitions of terms and examples. Experimental Design. Sampling versus experiments. For each experimental unit, measures of the variables of

Unit 27 One-Way Analysis of Variance

Introduction. Chapter 8

Orthogonal contrasts for a 2x2 factorial design Example p130

Ch 2: Simple Linear Regression

Key Features: More than one type of experimental unit and more than one randomization.

Unit 7: Random Effects, Subsampling, Nested and Crossed Factor Designs

3. Factorial Experiments (Ch.5. Factorial Experiments)

STAT Chapter 10: Analysis of Variance

Econ 3790: Business and Economics Statistics. Instructor: Yogesh Uppal

Unit 8: 2 k Factorial Designs, Single or Unequal Replications in Factorial Designs, and Incomplete Block Designs

Chapter 20 : Two factor studies one case per treatment Chapter 21: Randomized complete block designs

Lec 5: Factorial Experiment

EEC 686/785 Modeling & Performance Evaluation of Computer Systems. Lecture 19

Chapter 14 Simple Linear Regression (A)

Outline. Simulation of a Single-Server Queueing System. EEC 686/785 Modeling & Performance Evaluation of Computer Systems.

V. Experiments With Two Crossed Treatment Factors

PLSC PRACTICE TEST ONE

DOE DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. G. Olmi Università degli Studi di Bologna

2 Hand-out 2. Dr. M. P. M. M. M c Loughlin Revised 2018

The One-Way Repeated-Measures ANOVA. (For Within-Subjects Designs)

16.3 One-Way ANOVA: The Procedure

In a one-way ANOVA, the total sums of squares among observations is partitioned into two components: Sums of squares represent:

Chapter 10: Analysis of variance (ANOVA)

Introduction to Business Statistics QM 220 Chapter 12

One-Way Analysis of Variance: A Guide to Testing Differences Between Multiple Groups

Dr. Shalabh Department of Mathematics and Statistics Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

Chapter 11 - Lecture 1 Single Factor ANOVA

Lec 1: An Introduction to ANOVA

Inferences for Regression

Analysis Of Variance Compiled by T.O. Antwi-Asare, U.G

Stat 511 HW#10 Spring 2003 (corrected)

Correlation Analysis

STAT 705 Chapter 19: Two-way ANOVA

Basic Business Statistics 6 th Edition

Grant MacEwan University STAT 252 Dr. Karen Buro Formula Sheet

BALANCED INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS

1-Way ANOVA MATH 143. Spring Department of Mathematics and Statistics Calvin College

STAT 705 Chapter 19: Two-way ANOVA

" M A #M B. Standard deviation of the population (Greek lowercase letter sigma) σ 2

Analysis of Variance

What is Experimental Design?

n i n T Note: You can use the fact that t(.975; 10) = 2.228, t(.95; 10) = 1.813, t(.975; 12) = 2.179, t(.95; 12) =

Power & Sample Size Calculation

Chapter 11 - Lecture 1 Single Factor ANOVA

R version ( ) Copyright (C) 2009 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN

We need to define some concepts that are used in experiments.

While you wait: Enter the following in your calculator. Find the mean and sample variation of each group. Bluman, Chapter 12 1

2 and F Distributions. Barrow, Statistics for Economics, Accounting and Business Studies, 4 th edition Pearson Education Limited 2006

Transcription:

Statistical Methods in Business Lecture 3. Factorial Design: If we have many sets of populations we may compare the means of populations in each set with one experiment. Assume we have two factors with many levels each. Also assume that these two factors are independent from each other. Assume the Factor-A has r levels and the Factor-B has c levels. Assume that in our experiment we observe each combination of a level of the Factor-A and a level of the Factor-B n " times called numbers of replications. Although the replication number may be different for different combinations here we assumed that replication number is the same for all combinations. Thus the total number of observations in our data would be n = n " x r x c. Data Model: Assume our data set is $X &'( ) where X &'( is the value of the level i of the Factor-A and the level j of the Factor-B combination observe at the k th time (repetition number) i = 123 r; For j = 123 c; k = 123 n ". Let X &'( = μ + β & + ζ ' + ɤ &' + ε &'(. Where μ is the common mean for all of the observations β & is the level-i effect of the Factor-A ζ ' is the level-j effect of the Factor-B ɤ &' is the interaction effect between the level-i of the Factor-A and the level-j of the Factor-B and the independent r.v. ε &'( ~ Ɲ(0 σ 8 ) for all level-i of the Factor-A and level j of the Factor-B combinations for the k th replicate. Sample Averages: E D @A X9 = =BC >BC?BC < =>? GRAND MEAN. F 1 P age 8 Feb 2018

D @ A XG &.. = >BC?BC < =>? sample mean of the level i Factor-A. I For i = 123 r. E @ A XG.'. = =BC?BC < =>? sample mean of the level j Factor-B. For j = 123 c. XG &'. = @ A?BC < =>? sample mean of the level i Factor-A and level j Factor-B combination for all (ij) combinations; i = 12 r and j = 12 c. Measure of variations in data: &NO I 'NO (NO TOTAL: SST = KX &'( X9M 2 df T = n-1. FACTOR-A: SSA = &NO cn " KXG &.. X9M 2 df A = r-1. FACTOR-B: SSB = I 'NO rn " KXG.'. X9M 2 df B = c-1. FACTOR-AB or INTERACTION FACTOR: I 'NO SSAB = &NO n " KXG &'. XG &... XG.'. + X9M 2 df AB = (r-1) (c-1) by the independence assumption for Factor-A and Factor-B. I ERROR: SSE = &NO 'NO (NOKX &'( - XG &'. M 2 df E = rc (n " 1). CONSTRUCTING VARIANCE ESTIMATORS FROM OUR DATA: MSA MSB = SST UV W = SSX UV Y MSAB = SSTX UV WY MSE = SSZ UV [. 2 P age 8 Feb 2018

Summary of our computations: Two-way ANOVA with Replications Table Source Df SS MS Factor-A r-1 SSA MSA Factor-B c-1 SSB MSB Factor-AB (interaction) (r-1) (c-1) SSAB MSAB ERROR rc (n " -1) SSE MSE TOTAL n-1 SST By the independence of the source of variations in the data set we have: SST = SSA + SSB + SSAB + SSE and df T = df A + df B + df AB + df E. INVESTIGATION: In order to be able to investigate each factor being independent of the other factor we must have significant evidence in our data that supports the independence of two factors assumption. We begin our investigation for looking evidence of independence of Factor-A and Factor-B. H 0 : There is no significant interaction effect between Factor-A and Factor-B. H 1 : There is a significant interaction effect between Factor-A and Factor-B. Level of Significance:. Test Statistic: F S^T^ = _STX _SZ ~ F UV WY df Z. F bcd^dbte = F ; df TX df Z. Which is the point that generates amount of right tail area under the probability distribution F UVWY df Z. p-value = P (F > F S^T^ ) computed by using the probability distribution F UVWY df Z. Decision Rule: If F S^T^ > F bcd^dbte then reject H j. Or if p-value < then reject H j. Decision: We declare our decision. There are two possibilities: Case A: We reject H 0 at level of significance. We are (1- ) % confident that there is sufficient evidence in our data that shows dependence of the Factor-A and the Factor-B. Therefore we cannot separate each factor from the other and independently investigate each factor. Our investigation ends. 3 P age 8 Feb 2018

Case B: We cannot reject H j at level of significance. In that case we are (1- ) % confident that there is not enough evidence to show us that these two factors are not independent. Hence we can separate and independently investigate each factor as follows. Factor-A: H j : μ O.. = μ 8.. = = μ.. H O : At least one μ &.. is significantly different. Level of Significance: (we must use level of significance used in the interaction effect investigation previously). Test Statistic: F S^T^ = _ST _SZ ~ F UV W df Z. F bcd^dbte = = F ; df k df Z. p-value = P (F> F S^T^ ) by using F UVW df Z. Decision Rule: If F S^T^ > F bcd^dbte then reject H j. Or if p-value < then reject H j. Decision: There are two possibilities; Case A: We cannot reject H 0 at the level of significance. Investigation for Factor-A is over. Case B: We reject H 0 at the level of significance then we can investigate the levels of the Factor-A and identify levels that have significantly different means than the other levels. TUKEY PROCEDURE FOR FACTOR-A: Critical range for each pair of (i i ) levels: Decision rule: Cr (i i " ) = [Q ; r rc (n " 1)] o _SZ I. If XG &.. - XG & A.. > Cr (i i " ) then μ &.. and μ & A.. are significantly different. Repeat for all pairs (i i " ) of the Factor-A. This will complete the Factor-A investigation. 4 P age 8 Feb 2018

Factor-B Investigation. H 0: μ. O. = μ. 8. = = μ. I. H 1: At least one μ. '. is significantly different. Level of significance: (Again we must use the same level of significance used in the interaction effect investigation before). Test Statistic: F S^T^ = _SX _SZ ~ F UV Y df Z. F bcd^dbte = = F ; df X df Z. p-value = P (F>F S^T^) by using the probability distribution. F UVY df Z Decision Rule: If F S^T^ > F bcd^dbte then reject H 0. Or if p-value < then reject H 0. Decision: We have two possibilities; Case-A: We cannot reject H 0 at the level of significance. Hence our investigation for the Factor-B ends. Case-B: We reject H 0 at the level of significance. Therefore we must continue our investigation for identifying the levels of the Factor-B with significantly different means. TUKEY PROCEDURE FOR THE FACTOR-B: Critical range for each pair of (j j ) levels of the Factor-B: Decision Rule: Cr (j j " ) = [Q ; r rc (n " 1)] o _SZ. If pxg. '. - X. q ' A. p > Cr (j j " ) then μ. j. and μ. j ". are significantly different. Repeat for every pair of levels (j j " ) of the Factor-B. This will complete the Factor-B investigation. 5 P age 8 Feb 2018