Developments in Storage and Monitoring for CCUS

Similar documents
ADM CCS Projects Experience and Lessons Learned

Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture & Storage Project

The Illinois Basin Decatur Project Decatur, Illinois USA: Overview and Impacts. Sallie E. Greenberg

Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture & Storage Project

Development and Implementation of a Monitoring Plan at a 1-million Tonne CCS Demonstration: Decatur, Illinois USA

An Assessment of Geological Carbon Sequestration in the Illinois Basin: The Illinois Basin-Decatur Site

By: Jared T. Freiburg Illinois State Geological Survey 5/17/ cm

Monitoring with Time-lapse 3D VSPs at the Illinois Basin Decatur Project

Source Sink Pipeline

IBDP Pre-Injection Microseismicity

West Coast Research. WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission

Monitoring and Verification of CO 2 Storage in Geological Formations Sally M. Benson Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720

Measurement, Monitoring and Verification (MMV)

Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership

Geologic CO 2 Storage Options for California

Geologic and Reservoir Characterization and Modeling

Basin-scale Modeling of CO 2 Sequestration in the Illinois Basin Status Report

Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP) Press Briefing. February 21, 2008

CO2 Storage- Project list

region includes nine states and four provinces, covering over 1.4 million square miles. The PCOR Partnership

Recommendations for Injection and Storage Monitoring

Internal microseismic event pattern revealed by waveform cross-correlation analysis

The UK GeoEnergy Test Bed Ceri J Vincent British Geological Survey

QUEST Carbon Capture and Storage The Dynamic Aspects Of Formation Storage Use for CO2 Sequestration

Available online at GHGT-9. Elsevier use only: Received date here; revised date here; accepted date here

Geophysical Monitoring Researches for CO 2 Geological Storage. Shinsuke NAKAO Geological Survey of Japan, AIST

Basin-Scale Hydrological Impact of Geologic Carbon Sequestration in the Illinois Basin: A Full-Scale Deployment Scenario

FRIO BRINE SEQUESTRATION PILOT IN THE TEXAS GULF COAST

Developments on Microseismic Monitoring and Risk Assessment of Large-scale CO 2 Storage

Time-lapse seismic modeling of CO 2 sequestration at Quest CCS project

The Ketzin Test Site (former CO 2 Sink-project)

IN POLAND. Adam WÓJCICKI. National Research Institute

Preliminary TOUGH2 Model of King Island CO 2 Injection. Modeling Approach

Passive seismic monitoring at a CO2 injection site, Violet Grove, Alberta, Canada

Reservoir simulation and feasibility study for seismic monitoring at CaMI.FRS, Newell County, Alberta

An Open Air Museum. Success breeds Success. Depth Imaging; Microseismics; Dip analysis. The King of Giant Fields WESTERN NEWFOUNDLAND:

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12

Project Assessment and Evaluation of the Area of Review (AoR) at the Citronelle SECARB Phase III Site, Alabama USA

Borehole Seismic Monitoring of Injected CO 2 at the Frio Site

The Gorgon Project in Western Australia An overview from publically available sources

Western Kentucky CO 2 Storage Test

Time-lapse well logging to monitor injected CO 2 in an aquifer at Nagaoka

Western Kentucky Deep Saline Reservoir CO 2 Storage Test. Principal Investigators: J. Richard Bowersox - Lexington David A. Williams - Henderson

Kentucky Geological Survey Marvin Blan #1 Hancock County, Kentucky Geologic Review. J. Richard Bowersox David A. Williams Kentucky Geological Survey

ScienceDirect. Model-based assessment of seismic monitoring of CO 2 in a CCS project in Alberta, Canada, including a poroelastic approach

Initial Borehole Drilling in the Hornepayne and Manitouwadge Area

1 Complementary Access Tools

Storage: Deep Monitoring and Verification

Measurement, Monitoring & Verification. Dr. Lee H. Spangler, Director Zero Emission Research and Technology Center

Saline Formations MRCSP and Mountaineer Update

Initial Borehole Drilling and Testing in or Near Ignace

The Gorgon Project A brief Overview

Pressure Prediction and Hazard Avoidance through Improved Seismic Imaging

Initial Borehole Drilling and Testing in Central Huron,

MRCSP- Michigan Basin Geologic CO 2 Sequestration Field Test

Demonstration of capture, injection and geological Sequestration (storage) in Flood Basalt Formation of India.

MIDWEST REGIONAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION PARTNERSHIP PHASE II STORAGE CAPACITY POTENTIAL OVERVIEW

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS: What are Seismic Surveys and How are They Done?

Use of Seismic and EM Data for Exploration, Appraisal and Reservoir Characterization

3D time-lapse seismic monitoring of the pilot CO 2 storage site at Ketzin, Germany

Monitoring CO 2 Injection at Weyburn Reservoir Using 3-D/3-C Seismic Datasets

Geological CO 2 Storage Feasibility Study: Saline Aquifers and Depleted Oil Fields, Ordos Basin, Shaanxi Province

1. Why we need transboundary storage? Emissions versus storage capacity CCS Legislation Results versus emissions and storage capacity

Microseismicity applications in hydraulic fracturing monitoring

Economic Geology Unconventional Energy Research

Potential Injection-Induced Seismicity Associated With Oil & Gas Development

Storage 6 - Modeling for CO 2 Storage. Professor John Kaldi Chief Scientist, CO2CRC Australian School of Petroleum, University of Adelaide, Australia

How fast can a falcon fly?

Prepared. PO Box 880. Scott C. Ayash. John A. Hamling Edward N. Steadman John A. Harju. University. Grand Forks,

Energy Procedia 4 (2011) Energy Procedia 00 (2010) GHGT-10

2018 Annual Review of Availability Assessment Hours

Western Kentucky Deep Saline Reservoir CO 2 Storage Test. Principal Investigators: J. Richard Bowersox - Lexington David A. Williams - Henderson

STORAGE POTENTIAL OF POLAND (THE BALTIC BASIN) Adam Wójcicki & Jolanta Pacześna, PGI-NRI

Prepared For: NRAP Stakeholders Meeting February 4 and 5 th, Prepared By: George Koperna, VP ADVANCED RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Cranfield Phase III Modeling

Poland Bełchatów: storage in an onshore saline aquifer

Reservoir Modeling for Wabamun Area CO2 Sequestration Project (WASP) Davood Nowroozi

Risk Evaluation. Todd Shipman PhD, Alberta Geological Survey/Alberta Energy Regulator November 17 th,2017 Induced Seismicity Workshop, Yellowknife NWT

Interpretation of baseline surface seismic data at the Violet Grove CO 2 injection site, Alberta

Western Kentucky Deep Saline Reservoir CO 2 Storage Test. Principal Investigators: J. Richard Bowersox - Lexington David A. Williams - Henderson

SECARB Phase III Early Test, Cranfield, MS

Offshore Geosequestration Potential in the Gulf of Mexico. Carbon Sequestration Opportunities in the North Sea Conference March, 2010

MUDLOGGING, CORING, AND CASED HOLE LOGGING BASICS COPYRIGHT. Coring Operations Basics. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

Current challenges at CO 2 Sites

Exploring Eastern Africa. East Africa Oil and Gas Summit, 2014 March 2014

WESTCARB Regional Partnership

3D Time-lapse Seismic Modeling for CO2 Sequestration

SECARB Phase III ANTHROPOGENIC TEST: Risk Management through Detailed Geologic Characterization and Modeling

Improved Exploration, Appraisal and Production Monitoring with Multi-Transient EM Solutions

Feasibility study of time-lapse seismic monitoring of CO 2 sequestration

Geologic Storage (Almacenamiento Geológico) Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 )

Petrophysical Data Acquisition Basics. Coring Operations Basics

Seismic mapping of the Utsira Formation. Petrophysical interpretations and fracture gradient estimates.

The Alba Field: Improved Reservoir Characterisation using 4D Seismic Data. Elaine Campbell Oliver Hermann Steve Dobbs Andrew Warnock John Hampson

Experienced specialists providing consulting services worldwide. Coalbed Methane Consulting Services

Addressing Critical Issues in Geologic Storage Through Mountaineer and MRCSP Projects: Part 2 The Mountaineer Project

An Overview of the Tapia Canyon Field Static Geocellular Model and Simulation Study

U.S. Geological Survey National Geologic Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Assessment. U.S. Geological Survey Department of the Interior

Minewater Management Annual Meeting Marion, Illinois. August 13, 2013

Regulatory Considerations for Evaluating the Potential for Induced Seismicity of a Class I Non-Hazardous Disposal Well

Transcription:

Developments in Storage and Monitoring for CCUS Steve Whittaker Director Energy Research & Development Illinois State Geological Survey 4 th Beijing International Forum on Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage Technology

CCUS Progression to Commercialization ICCS: 3-5.5 MT Industry Site CarbonSAFE Illinois: >50 MT Commercialization IBDP: 1 MT Demonstration Aspects of monitoring active industrial sites Geological factors Evolving monitoring technology Technology transfer Non-technical issues policy, business, regulatory

STORAGE: Geology - Illinois Basin Mt Simon Storage Complex Sandstones about 2100m (7,000 ft) depth Illinois Basin Decatur Project Demonstration 1 MT CO 2 Illinois Industrial CCS Project Industrial 3.5 5 MT CO 2 CarbonSAFE Illinois Commercial >50 MT CO 2 Lower Cambrian Sandstones used for CCUS at other North American storage sites QUEST Alberta Canada AQUISTORE Saskatchewan Canada Mount Simon Storage Complex: 11 to 150 GT (Efficiency = 0.4 to 5.5%) Michigan USA

Industrial Sites Impact Monitoring D 800 m D E Illinois Basin Decatur Project (1MT) E Verification/ monitoring well site (VW1) Archer Daniels Midland Industrial site D C C B D Geophone well C Injection well site (CCS1) ~150 m B B Pipeline route (1.9 km) A A A Dehydration/ compression facility locatio

Environmental Monitoring (MVA) Risk Based Conceptual Framework Near Surface Deep Subsurface Soil and Vadose Zone Ground Water Above Seal Injection Zone Aerial Imagery Soil CO 2 Flux Geochemical Sampling P/T Monitoring Geophysical Surveys Seismic Monitoring Geophysical Surveys Geochemical sampling P Monitoring P/T Monitoring

MONITORING: Verification Well 1 - Westbay Completion Deepest Westbay installation in the world 7126 ft (2172 m) 11 monitoring zones from 1493 to 2152 m Inflatable packer Seal Pressure and fluid sampling port Sliding Sleeve Reservoir Monitoring zones in injection zone and above seal

MONITORING: Pressure Response in Verification Well 1 Nov 2011 Nov 2014 IBDP = 1MT injection (999,215 tonnes) Post-injection monitoring

MONITORING: Upgrading Technology Recompletion of VW1 Well Option 1 Retain Westbay Option 2 Schlumberger IntelliZone Option 3 Baker Hughes Intelligent System Option 4 Drill new well Baker Hughes Intelligent System Oil field technology transfer Two Fluid Sampling Four Pressure Zones

1st Pre-Injection MONITORNG: Repeat Pulsed Neutron Logging in VW1 Post-Injection RST Monitoring Baseline surveys CO 2 arrival before Mar 2012 CO 2 saturation increasing though Nov 2015

PERFORMANCE MONITORING: Improves Prediction Updated Model Saturation x Thickness Injector Monitor Well Prior Plume Outline

MONITORING: Time-lapse Seismic NRM Attribute NRMS Attribute Seismic attribute plume Outline Updated Modeled Plume Outline Updated Modeled Plume Outline

Location critical to understanding reservoir response Study of relation of clusters to: pressure front and basement characteristics MONITORING: Microseismic Activity

VERIFICATION WELL 2 North ~800 meters ICCS Project 5 MT (BECCS) GM2 INJECTION WELL CCS2 IMS Area Intellizone System Class VI permit issued Sep 2014 VW1 IB-DP Project 1MT GM1 CCS1 Class VI permit issued Feb 2015 ADM Facility

STORAGE: RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION VW1 6,863-6,863.25 BAFFLE Porosity: 1.5% K v : <0.01 md K h : 4.13 md in siltstone laminae 1 mm Zone 5 IL-ICCS Injection Zone Baffle (mudstone) 10 cm IBDP Injection Zone

Simulated Plume Interaction After injection complete S-SW N-NE Eau Claire 1.6Km Mt Simon C, D, E IBDP IL-CCS Pre-Mt Simon Mt Simon A, B Mudstone Lower Mt Simon A

Illinois Industrial CCS injection startup April 7 Step rate increase of CO 2 to full injection

Permitting can be a Critical Factor for Project Advancement Permitting has been a rate-limiting step for both projects Permits for IBDP Post-injection Site Care and ICCS injection + Post-injection tied together Example: ICCS application submitted: 25 Jul 2011 Draft permit issued: 4 Apr 2014 Public hearing conducted: 21 May 2014 Public comment period ended: 31 May 2014 Final permit issued 28 Dec 2014 Permission to inject: 7 Apr 2017

Industrial scale Risk based Demonstration scale Risk and research based

Project Team Intelligent Monitoring Systems (IMS) Program Components DAS (digital acoustic sensors) seismic imaging (VSP & surface reflection) Permanent rotary surface source Hybrid geophone/das microseismic array DTS (distributed temperature sensors) well integrity monitoring Integration into the existing systems. Sparser surface infrastructure

CarbonSAFE Illinois Develop Commercial-Scale storage hub >50 million tonne Storage Complex Examine CO2 EOR potential OBJECTIVES Address gap in around development of large-scale carbon storage Validate technologies to ensure containment Improve storage capacity estimates for industry investment decisions Forsyth Field ICCS/IBDP Project Areas 20

Storage Development Learning from the oil & gas industry are directly applicable Complementary skills, resources and equipment Choose the best geology for large-scale storage Determine need for pressure management Monitoring strategy (risk based) is moving toward sparser, less surface intense methods Permitting still can be a hurdle ISO 27914 - Standards for Geological Storage of CO 2 Provide operator, regulatory, and investment confidence Identify DRIVERS policy / economic / utilization

THANK YOU The Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy through the National Energy Technology Laboratory via the Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Program (contract number DE-FC26-05NT42588) The MGSC is a collaboration led by the geological surveys of Illinois, Indiana, and Kentucky The Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage project is administered by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy and managed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (award number DE-FE-0001547) and cost share agreements with ADM, ISGS, SLB, & RCC. The Intelligent Monitoring System Project is administered by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy and managed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (award number DE-FE- 0026517) and by cost share agreements with the ADM, LBNL, Silixa, SLB, ISGS, & RCC. CarbonSAFE Illinois is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DE-FE00029381)