Frobenius Distributions

Similar documents
Equidistributions in arithmetic geometry

Point counting and real multiplication on K3 surfaces

L-Polynomials of Curves over Finite Fields

The Sato-Tate conjecture for abelian varieties

Identifying supersingular elliptic curves

Computing L-series of geometrically hyperelliptic curves of genus three. David Harvey, Maike Massierer, Andrew V. Sutherland

Computation of zeta and L-functions: feasibility and applications

FINITE GROUPS AND EQUATIONS OVER FINITE FIELDS A PROBLEM SET FOR ARIZONA WINTER SCHOOL 2016

ANDREAS-STEPHAN ELSENHANS AND JÖRG JAHNEL

Equations for Hilbert modular surfaces

Computing the image of Galois

14 Ordinary and supersingular elliptic curves

Computing the endomorphism ring of an ordinary elliptic curve

THE ZETA FUNCTIONS OF THE FANO SURFACES OF CUBIC THREEFOLDS

Constructing genus 2 curves over finite fields

HONDA-TATE THEOREM FOR ELLIPTIC CURVES

Quasi-reducible Polynomials

ORAL QUALIFYING EXAM QUESTIONS. 1. Algebra

Elliptic Curves over Finite Fields 1

Introduction to Elliptic Curves

LECTURE 7, WEDNESDAY

Elliptic curves over function fields 1

(joint with Frithjof Schulze) K3 surfaces and Galois representations, May 3, 2018

Even sharper upper bounds on the number of points on curves

Computing zeta functions of nondegenerate toric hypersurfaces

LECTURE 2 FRANZ LEMMERMEYER

K3 Surfaces and Lattice Theory

Isogeny graphs, modular polynomials, and point counting for higher genus curves

Isogeny invariance of the BSD conjecture

Page Points Possible Points. Total 200

Counting points on genus 2 curves over finite

Elliptic Curves Spring 2019 Problem Set #7 Due: 04/08/2019

An Introduction to Supersingular Elliptic Curves and Supersingular Primes

Higher Hasse Witt matrices. Masha Vlasenko. June 1, 2016 UAM Poznań

Counting points on smooth plane quartics

Explicit Arithmetic on Algebraic Surfaces

1. Group Theory Permutations.

Isogeny graphs of abelian varieties and applications to the Discrete Logarithm Problem

Galois Representations

ON THE COMPUTATION OF THE PICARD GROUP FOR K3 SURFACES

Transcendence in Positive Characteristic

Rational points on curves and tropical geometry.

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry

On symmetric square values of quadratic polynomials

Garrett Z p. Few explicit parametrizations of algebraic closures of fields are known: not Q, for sure. But we do also know

Class numbers of algebraic function fields, or Jacobians of curves over finite fields

2,3,5, LEGENDRE: ±TRACE RATIOS IN FAMILIES OF ELLIPTIC CURVES

Counting points on elliptic curves: Hasse s theorem and recent developments

Constructing Abelian Varieties for Pairing-Based Cryptography

Supersingular K3 Surfaces are Unirational

LINES ON CUBIC HYPERSURFACES OVER FINITE FIELDS. 1. Introduction

Counting points on hyperelliptic curves

Optimal curves of genus 1, 2 and 3

On the equality case of the Ramanujan Conjecture for Hilbert modular forms

Solving Cubic Equations: An Introduction to the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture

A survey of p-adic approaches to zeta functions (plus a new approach)

Homework 8 Solutions to Selected Problems

FORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS

Classification of Finite Fields

Galois Theory of Several Variables

Genus 2 Curves of p-rank 1 via CM method

TAMAGAWA NUMBERS OF ELLIPTIC CURVES WITH C 13 TORSION OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS

FACTORIZATION OF IDEALS

Titchmarsh divisor problem for abelian varieties of type I, II, III, and IV

this to include the explicit maps, please do so!

Modularity of Abelian Varieties

Elliptic Curves, Group Schemes,

On the distribution of rational points on certain Kummer surfaces

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #24 12/03/2013

ISOGENY GRAPHS OF ORDINARY ABELIAN VARIETIES

Infinite rank of elliptic curves over Q ab and quadratic twists with positive rank

Newman s Conjecture for function field L-functions

TOTALLY RAMIFIED PRIMES AND EISENSTEIN POLYNOMIALS. 1. Introduction

On the computation of the Picard group for K3 surfaces

Counting points on elliptic curves over F q

arxiv: v2 [math.ag] 21 May 2014

Direction: You are required to complete this test by Monday (April 24, 2006). In order to

Public-key Cryptography: Theory and Practice

Class invariants for quartic CM-fields

Math 201C Homework. Edward Burkard. g 1 (u) v + f 2(u) g 2 (u) v2 + + f n(u) a 2,k u k v a 1,k u k v + k=0. k=0 d

A RADICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ABELIAN VARIETIES

Elliptic Curves, Factorization, and Cryptography

MA 162B LECTURE NOTES: THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 26

K3 surfaces of Picard rank one which are double covers of the projective plane

1 The Galois Group of a Quadratic

Elliptic Curves and Public Key Cryptography

Elliptic Curves Spring 2015 Lecture #23 05/05/2015

Calculation and arithmetic significance of modular forms

Proof of the Shafarevich conjecture

On elliptic curves in characteristic 2 with wild additive reduction

Structure of elliptic curves and addition laws

COUNTING MOD l SOLUTIONS VIA MODULAR FORMS

GEOMETRIC CLASS FIELD THEORY I

Geometry dictates arithmetic

Non-generic attacks on elliptic curve DLPs

CONSTRUCTING SUPERSINGULAR ELLIPTIC CURVES. Reinier Bröker

K3 surfaces of Picard rank one and degree two

The Zeta Function of a Cyclic Language with Connections to Elliptic Curves and Chip-Firing Games

c Copyright 2012 Wenhan Wang

On some congruence properties of elliptic curves

Transcription:

Frobenius Distributions Edgar Costa (MIT) September 11th, 2018 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Slides available at edgarcosta.org under Research

Polynomials Write f p (x) := f(x) mod p f(x) = a n x n + + a 0 Z[x] Given f p (x) what can we say about f(x)?

Polynomials Write f p (x) := f(x) mod p f(x) = a n x n + + a 0 Z[x] Given f p (x) what can we say about f(x)? factorization of f p (x) factorization of f(x) e.g.: f p(x) irreducible f(x) irreducible factorization of p in Q[x]/f(x)

Polynomials Write f p (x) := f(x) mod p f(x) = a n x n + + a 0 Z[x] Given f p (x) what can we say about f(x)? factorization of f p (x) factorization of f(x) e.g.: f p(x) irreducible f(x) irreducible factorization of p in Q[x]/f(x) What can we say about f p (x) for arbitrary p?

Polynomials Write f p (x) := f(x) mod p f(x) = a n x n + + a 0 Z[x] Given f p (x) what can we say about f(x)? factorization of f p (x) factorization of f(x) e.g.: f p(x) irreducible f(x) irreducible factorization of p in Q[x]/f(x) What can we say about f p (x) for arbitrary p? For deg f = 2, quadratic reciprocity gives us that N f (p) := #{α F p : f p (α) = 0} depending only on p mod (f).

Polynomials Write f p (x) := f(x) mod p f(x) = a n x n + + a 0 Z[x] Given f p (x) what can we say about f(x)? factorization of f p (x) factorization of f(x) e.g.: f p(x) irreducible f(x) irreducible factorization of p in Q[x]/f(x) What can we say about f p (x) for arbitrary p? For deg f = 2, quadratic reciprocity gives us that N f (p) := #{α F p : f p (α) = 0} depending only on p mod (f). What about for higher degrees? studying the statistical properties N f (p).

Example: Cubic polynomials Theorem (Frobenius) Prob(N f (p) = i) = Prob(g Gal(f) : g fixes i roots),

Example: Cubic polynomials Theorem (Frobenius) Prob(N f (p) = i) = Prob(g Gal(f) : g fixes i roots), ) ( ) ( ) f(x) = x 3 2 = (x 3 2 x 3 2e 2πi/3 x 3 2e 4πi/3 Prob ( N f (p) = k ) 1/3 if k = 0 = 1/2 if k = 1 1/6 if k = 3. g(x) = x 3 x 2 2x + 1 = (x α 1 ) (x α 2 ) (x α 3 ) 2/3 if k = 0 Prob (N g (p) = k) = 1/3 if k = 3.

Example: Cubic polynomials Theorem (Frobenius) Prob(N f (p) = i) = Prob(g Gal(f) : g fixes i roots), ) ( ) ( ) f(x) = x 3 2 = (x 3 2 x 3 2e 2πi/3 x 3 2e 4πi/3 Prob ( N f (p) = k ) 1/3 if k = 0 = 1/2 if k = 1 Gal(f) = S 3 1/6 if k = 3. g(x) = x 3 x 2 2x + 1 = (x α 1 ) (x α 2 ) (x α 3 ) 2/3 if k = 0 Prob (N g (p) = k) = Gal(g) = Z/3Z 1/3 if k = 3.

Elliptic curves E : y 2 = x 3 + ax + b, a, b Z

Elliptic curves E : y 2 = x 3 + ax + b, a, b Z Write E p := E mod p, for p a prime of good reduction What can we say about #E p for an arbitrary p?

Elliptic curves E : y 2 = x 3 + ax + b, a, b Z Write E p := E mod p, for p a prime of good reduction What can we say about #E p for an arbitrary p? Given #E p for many p, what can we say about E?

Elliptic curves E : y 2 = x 3 + ax + b, a, b Z Write E p := E mod p, for p a prime of good reduction What can we say about #E p for an arbitrary p? Given #E p for many p, what can we say about E? studying the statistical properties #E p.

Hasse s bound Theorem (Hasse) #E p = p + 1 a p, a p [ 2 p, 2 p]

Hasse s bound Theorem (Hasse) #E p = p + 1 a p, a p [ 2 p, 2 p] Alternatively, we could also have written the formula above as #E p = L(1), where L(T) = 1 a p T + pt 2 = det(1 T Frob p H 1 (E)) Question What can we say about the error term a p / p as p?

Hasse s bound Theorem (Hasse) #E p = p + 1 a p, a p [ 2 p, 2 p] Alternatively, we could also have written the formula above as #E p = L(1), where L(T) = 1 a p T + pt 2 = det(1 T Frob p H 1 (E)) Question What can we say about the error term a p / p as p?

Two types of elliptic curves a p = p + 1 #E p = Tr Frob p [ 2 p, 2 p] There are two limiting distributions for a p / p

Two types of elliptic curves a p = p + 1 #E p = Tr Frob p [ 2 p, 2 p] There are two limiting distributions for a p / p -2-1 1 2-2 -1 0 1 2

Two types of elliptic curves a p = p + 1 #E p = Tr Frob p [ 2 p, 2 p] There are two limiting distributions for a p / p non-cm End Q E al = Q CM End Q E al = Q( d) -2-1 1 2-2 -1 0 1 2

Two types of elliptic curves a p = p + 1 #E p = Tr Frob p [ 2 p, 2 p] There are two limiting distributions for a p / p non-cm End Q E al = Q CM End Q E al = Q( d) -2-1 1 2-2 -1 0 1 2 Prob(a p = 0)? 1/ p Prob(a p = 0) = 1/2

Two types of elliptic curves a p = p + 1 #E p = Tr Frob p [ 2 p, 2 p] There are two limiting distributions for a p / p non-cm End Q E al = Q CM End Q E al = Q( d) -2-1 1 2-2 -1 0 1 2 Prob(a p = 0)? 1/ p Prob(a p = 0) = 1/2 a p = 0 Q(Frob p ) End Q E p al dim End Q E p al > 2

Two types of elliptic curves a p = p + 1 #E p = Tr Frob p [ 2 p, 2 p] There are two limiting distributions for a p / p non-cm End Q E al = Q CM End Q E al = Q( d) -2-1 1 2-2 -1 0 1 2 Prob(a p = 0)? 1/ p Prob(a p = 0) = 1/2 a p = 0 Q(Frob p ) End Q E p al dim End Q E al p > 2 = min dim End Q E al q q

How to distinguish between the two types? non-cm End Q E al = Q CM End Q E al = Q( d) -2-1 1 2-2 -1 0 1 2 End Q E al End Q E al p Q(Frob p ) a p 0 End Q E p al is a quadratic field

How to distinguish between the two types? non-cm End Q E al = Q CM End Q E al = Q( d) -2-1 1 2-2 -1 0 1 2 End Q E al End Q E al p Q(Frob p ) a p 0 End Q E p al is a quadratic field If E has CM and a p 0, then End Q E al End Q E al p.

How to distinguish between the two types? non-cm End Q E al = Q CM End Q E al = Q( d) -2-1 1 2-2 -1 0 1 2 End Q E al End Q E al p Q(Frob p ) a p 0 End Q E p al is a quadratic field If E has CM and a p 0, then End Q E al End Q E al p. If E is non-cm, then End Q E al p End Q E al q Q with prob. 1.

Examples E : y 2 + y = x 3 x 2 10x 20 (11.a2) End Q E al 2 Q( 1) End Q E al 3 Q( 11) End Q E al = Q

Examples E : y 2 + y = x 3 x 2 10x 20 (11.a2) End Q E al 2 Q( 1) End Q E al 3 Q( 11) End Q E al = Q E : y 2 + y = x 3 7 (27.a2) p = 2 mod 3 a p = 0 End Q E al p is a Quaternion algebra p = 1 mod 3 End Q E al p Q( 3) End Q E al = Q( 3)

Genus 2 curves/abelian surfaces A := Jac(C : y 2 = a 6 x 6 + + a 0 )

Genus 2 curves/abelian surfaces A := Jac(C : y 2 = a 6 x 6 + + a 0 ) There are 6 possibilities for the real endomorphism algebra: Abelian surface square of CM elliptic curve QM abelian surface square of non-cm elliptic curve CM abelian surface product of CM elliptic curves product of CM and non-cm elliptic curves RM abelian surface product of non-cm elliptic curves generic abelian surface End R A al M 2 (C) M 2 (R) C C C R R R R

Genus 2 curves/abelian surfaces A := Jac(C : y 2 = a 6 x 6 + + a 0 ) There are 6 possibilities for the real endomorphism algebra: Abelian surface square of CM elliptic curve QM abelian surface square of non-cm elliptic curve CM abelian surface product of CM elliptic curves product of CM and non-cm elliptic curves RM abelian surface product of non-cm elliptic curves generic abelian surface End R A al M 2 (C) M 2 (R) C C C R R R R Can we distinguish between these by looking at A mod p?

Zeta functions and Frobenius polynomials C/Q a nice curve of genus g A := Jac(C) p a prime of good reduction ( ) Z p (T) := exp #C(F p r)t r /r where deg L p (T) = 2g and r=1 Q(t) L p (T) = det(1 t Frob p H 1 (C)) = det(1 t Frob p H 1 (A))

Zeta functions and Frobenius polynomials C/Q a nice curve of genus g A := Jac(C) p a prime of good reduction ( ) Z p (T) := exp #C(F p r)t r /r r=1 where deg L p (T) = 2g and = L p (T) (1 T)(1 pt) L p (T) = det(1 t Frob p H 1 (C)) = det(1 t Frob p H 1 (A)) g = 1 L p (T) = 1 a p T + pt 2 g = 2 L p (T) = 1 a p,1 T + a p,2 T 2 a p,1 pt 3 + p 2 T 4

Zeta functions and Frobenius polynomials C/Q a nice curve of genus g A := Jac(C) p a prime of good reduction ( ) Z p (T) := exp #C(F p r)t r /r r=1 where deg L p (T) = 2g and = L p (T) (1 T)(1 pt) L p (T) = det(1 t Frob p H 1 (C)) = det(1 t Frob p H 1 (A)) g = 1 L p (T) = 1 a p T + pt 2 g = 2 L p (T) = 1 a p,1 T + a p,2 T 2 a p,1 pt 3 + p 2 T 4 L p (T) gives us a lot of information about A p := A mod p

Endomorphism algebras over finite fields Theorem (Tate) Let A be an abelian variety over F q, given det(1 t Frob H 1 (A)), we may compute rk End(A Fq r ), r 1

Endomorphism algebras over finite fields Theorem (Tate) Let A be an abelian variety over F q, given det(1 t Frob H 1 (A)), we may compute rk End(A Fq r ), r 1 Honda Tate theory = gives us End Q (A Fq r ) up to isomorphism

Endomorphism algebras over finite fields Theorem (Tate) Let A be an abelian variety over F q, given det(1 t Frob H 1 (A)), we may compute rk End(A Fq r ), r 1 Honda Tate theory = gives us End Q (A Fq r ) up to isomorphism Example If L 5 (T) = 1 2T 2 + 25T 4, then: all endomorphisms are defined over F 25, and A F25 is isogenous to a square of an elliptic curve End Q A al M 2 (Q( 6))

Example continued A = Jac(y 2 = x 5 x 4 + 4x 3 8x 2 + 5x 1) (262144.d.524288.1) For p = 5, L 5 (T) = 1 2T 2 + 25T 4, and: all endomorphisms of A 5 are defined over F 25 det(1 T Frob 2 5 H 1 (A)) = (1 2T + 25T 2 ) 2 A 5 over F 25 is isogenous to a square of an elliptic curve End Q A al 5 M 2(Q( 6))

Example continued A = Jac(y 2 = x 5 x 4 + 4x 3 8x 2 + 5x 1) (262144.d.524288.1) For p = 5, L 5 (T) = 1 2T 2 + 25T 4, and: all endomorphisms of A 5 are defined over F 25 det(1 T Frob 2 5 H 1 (A)) = (1 2T + 25T 2 ) 2 A 5 over F 25 is isogenous to a square of an elliptic curve End Q A al 5 M 2(Q( 6)) For p = 7, L 7 (T) = 1 + 6T 2 + 49T 4, and: all endomorphisms of A 7 are defined over F 49 det(1 T Frob 2 7 H 1 (A)) = (1 + 6T + 49T 2 ) 2 A 7 over F 49 is isogenous to a square of an elliptic curve End Q A al 7 M 2(Q( 10))

Example continued A = Jac(y 2 = x 5 x 4 + 4x 3 8x 2 + 5x 1) (262144.d.524288.1) For p = 5, L 5 (T) = 1 2T 2 + 25T 4, and: all endomorphisms of A 5 are defined over F 25 det(1 T Frob 2 5 H 1 (A)) = (1 2T + 25T 2 ) 2 A 5 over F 25 is isogenous to a square of an elliptic curve End Q A al 5 M 2(Q( 6)) For p = 7, L 7 (T) = 1 + 6T 2 + 49T 4, and: all endomorphisms of A 7 are defined over F 49 det(1 T Frob 2 7 H 1 (A)) = (1 + 6T + 49T 2 ) 2 A 7 over F 49 is isogenous to a square of an elliptic curve End Q A al 7 M 2(Q( 10)) End R A al M 2 (C)

Same L p, different approach We could have looked at the lattice Néron Severi lattice. rk NS(A al ) {1, 2, 3, 4} rk NS(A al p ) {2, 4, 6} Example NS(A al ) NS(A al p ) rk NS(A al 5 ) = rk NS(Aal 7 ) = 4 disc NS(A al 5 ) = 6 mod Q 2 disc NS(A al 7 ) = 10 mod Q 2 rk NS(A al ) 3 Fact By a theorem of Charles, we know that at some point this method will attain a tight upper bound for rk NS(A al ).

Real endomorphisms algebras and Picard numbers Abelian surface End R A al rk NS(A al ) square of CM elliptic curve M 2 (C) 4 QM abelian surface M 2 (R) 3 square of non-cm elliptic curve CM abelian surface C C 2 product of CM elliptic curves product of CM and non-cm elliptic curves C R 2 RM abelian surface R R 2 product of non-cm elliptic curves generic abelian surface R 1

Higher genus Let K be a numberfield such that End A K = End A al, then A K t i=1 An i i, A i unique and simple up to isogeny (over K), B i := End Q A i central simple algebra over L i := Z(B i ), dim Li B i = e 2 i, End Q A K = t i=1 M n i (B i )

Higher genus Let K be a numberfield such that End A K = End A al, then A K t i=1 An i i, A i unique and simple up to isogeny (over K), B i := End Q A i central simple algebra over L i := Z(B i ), dim Li B i = e 2 i, End Q A K = t i=1 M n i (B i ) Theorem (C Mascot Sijsling Voight) If Mumford Tate conjecture holds for A, then we can compute t {(e i n i, n i dim A i )} t i=1 L i, under an additional assumption (always seems to hold) This is practical and its done by counting points (=computing L p )

Real endomorphisms algebras, {e i n i, n i dim A i } t i=1, and dim L i Abelian surface End R A al tuples dim L i square of CM elliptic crv M 2 (C) {(2, 2)} 2 QM abelian surface M 2 (R) {(2, 2)} 1 square of non-cm elliptic crv CM abelian surface C C {(1, 2)} 4 product of CM elliptic crv {(1, 1), (1, 1)} 2, 2 CM non-cm elliptic crvs C R {(1, 1), (1, 1)} 2, 1 RM abelian surface R R {(1, 2)} 2 prod. of non-cm elliptic crv {(1, 1), (1, 1)} 1, 1 generic abelian surface R {(1, 1)} 1

Example continued A = Jac(y 2 = x 5 x 4 + 4x 3 8x 2 + 5x 1) End Q A al 3 M 2(Q( 3)) End Q A al 5 M 2(Q( 6)) End R A al M 2 (C) Question (262144.d.524288.1) Write B := End Q A al and assume that B is a quaternion algr. Can we guess disc B? If l ell is ramified in B l cannot split in Q(Frob p ) 5, 13, 17 disc B, as they split in Q( 3) 7, 11 disc B, as they split in Q( 6) We can rule out all the primes except 2 and 3 (up to some bnd).

Example continued A = Jac(y 2 = x 5 x 4 + 4x 3 8x 2 + 5x 1) End Q A al 3 M 2(Q( 3)) End Q A al 5 M 2(Q( 6)) End R A al M 2 (C) Question (262144.d.524288.1) Write B := End Q A al and assume that B is a quaternion algr. Can we guess disc B? If l ell is ramified in B l cannot split in Q(Frob p ) 5, 13, 17 disc B, as they split in Q( 3) 7, 11 disc B, as they split in Q( 6) We can rule out all the primes except 2 and 3 (up to some bnd). Indeed disc B = 6.

K3 surfaces K3 surfaces are a possible generalization of elliptic curves They may arise in many ways: smooth quartic surfaces in P 3 X : f(x, y, z, w) = 0, deg f = 4 double cover of P 2 branched over a sextic curve X : w 2 = f(x, y, z), deg f = 6

K3 surfaces K3 surfaces are a possible generalization of elliptic curves They may arise in many ways: smooth quartic surfaces in P 3 X : f(x, y, z, w) = 0, deg f = 4 double cover of P 2 branched over a sextic curve X : w 2 = f(x, y, z), deg f = 6 Can we play similar game as before?

K3 surfaces K3 surfaces are a possible generalization of elliptic curves They may arise in many ways: smooth quartic surfaces in P 3 X : f(x, y, z, w) = 0, deg f = 4 double cover of P 2 branched over a sextic curve X : w 2 = f(x, y, z), deg f = 6 Can we play similar game as before? In this case, instead of studying #X p or Tr Frob p we study p rk NS X al p {2, 4,..., 22}

K3 Surfaces X/Q a K3 surface p rk NS X al p {2, 4,..., 22} This is analogous to studying: p rk End E al p {2, 4}

K3 Surfaces X/Q a K3 surface p rk NS X al p {2, 4,..., 22} This is analogous to studying: p rk End E al p {2, 4} Recall that: rk End E al p = 4 a p = 0? 1 Prob(a p = 0) = p if E is non-cm (Lang Trotter) 1/2 if E has CM by Q( d)

K3 Surfaces X/Q a K3 surface p rk NS X al p {2, 4,..., 22} This is analogous to studying: p rk End E al p {2, 4} Recall that: rk End E al p = 4 a p = 0? 1 Prob(a p = 0) = p if E is non-cm (Lang Trotter) 1/2 if E has CM by Q( d) In the later case, {p : a p = 0} = {p : p is ramified or inert in Q( d)}

Néron Severi group NS = Néron Severi group of {curves on }/ ρ( ) = rk NS X p := X mod p

Néron Severi group NS = Néron Severi group of {curves on }/ ρ( ) = rk NS X p := X mod p X NS X al ρ(x al ) {1, 2,..., 20}??? X p NS X p al ρ(x p al ) {2, 4,... 22}

Néron Severi group NS = Néron Severi group of {curves on }/ ρ( ) = rk NS X p := X mod p X NS X al ρ(x al ) {1, 2,..., 20}??? X p NS X p al ρ(x p al ) {2, 4,... 22} Theorem (Charles) For infinitely many p we have ρ(x p al ) = min q ρ(x q al ).

The Problem X NS X al ρ(x al ) {1, 2,..., 20}??? X p NS X p al ρ(x p al ) {2, 4,... 22} Theorem (Charles) For infinitely many p we have ρ(x p al ) = min q ρ(x q al ). What can we say about the following: Π jump (X) := { p : ρ(x p al ) > min q ρ(x q al ) }

The Problem X NS X al ρ(x al ) {1, 2,..., 20}??? X p NS X p al ρ(x p al ) {2, 4,... 22} Theorem (Charles) For infinitely many p we have ρ(x p al ) = min q ρ(x q al ). What can we say about the following: Π jump (X) := { p : ρ(x p al ) > min q ρ(x q al ) } γ(x, B) := # {p B : p Π jump(x)} # {p B} as B

The Problem X NS X al ρ(x al ) {1, 2,..., 20}??? X p NS X p al ρ(x p al ) {2, 4,... 22} Theorem (Charles) For infinitely many p we have ρ(x p al ) = min q ρ(x q al ). What can we say about the following: Π jump (X) := { p : ρ(x p al ) > min q ρ(x q al ) } γ(x, B) := # {p B : p Π jump(x)} # {p B} Let s do some numerical experiments! as B

Two generic K3 surfaces, ρ(x al ) = 1 γ(x, B)? c X B, B

Two generic K3 surfaces, ρ(x al ) = 1 γ(x, B)? c X B, B = Prob(p Π jump (X))? 1/ p

Two generic K3 surfaces, ρ(x al ) = 1 γ(x, B)? c X B, B = Prob(p Π jump (X))? 1/ p Why?

Three K3 surfaces with ρ(x al ) = 2

Three K3 surfaces with ρ(x al ) = 2 No obvious trend

Three K3 surfaces with ρ(x al ) = 2 No obvious trend Could it be related to some integer being a square modulo p?

We can explain the 1/2 Theorem (C, C Elsenhans Jahnel) If ρ(x al ) = min q ρ(x al p ), then there is a d X Z such that: { p > 2 : p inert in Q( } d X ) Π jump (X). In general, d X is not a square.

We can explain the 1/2 Theorem (C, C Elsenhans Jahnel) If ρ(x al ) = min q ρ(x al p ), then there is a d X Z such that: { p > 2 : p inert in Q( } d X ) Π jump (X). In general, d X is not a square. Corollary If d X is not a square: lim inf B γ(x, B) 1/2 X al has infinitely many rational curves.

We can explain the 1/2 Theorem (C, C Elsenhans Jahnel) If ρ(x al ) = min q ρ(x al p ), then there is a d X Z such that: { p > 2 : p inert in Q( } d X ) Π jump (X). In general, d X is not a square. Corollary If d X is not a square: lim inf B γ(x, B) 1/2 X al has infinitely many rational curves. D 3 = 1 5 151 22490817357414371041 3873084974301493372336663588079962607808750567408509842132769703432789353 D 4 =53 2624174618795407 512854561846964817139494202072778341 1215218370089028769076718102126921744353362873 68 D 5 = 1 47 3109 4969 14857095849982608071 445410277660928347762586764331874432202584688016149 658652708525

Experimental data for ρ(x al ) = 2 (again) What if we ignore { p > 2 : p inert in Q( d X ) } Π jump (X)?

Experimental data for ρ(x al ) = 2 (again) What if we ignore { p > 2 : p inert in Q( d X ) } Π jump (X)? ) γ (X ( )?, B c, B Q dx B 1 0.50 γ( ) - 1 0.50 γ( ) - 1 0.50 γ( ) - 0.10 0.05 0.10 0.05 0.10 0.05 100 1000 10 4 10 5 1000 10 4 10 5 100 1000 10 4 10 5

Experimental data for ρ(x al ) = 2 (again) What if we ignore { p > 2 : p inert in Q( d X ) } Π jump (X)? ) γ (X ( )?, B c, B Q dx B 1 0.50 γ( ) - 1 0.50 γ( ) - 1 0.50 γ( ) - 0.10 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 100 1000 10 4 10 5 1000 10 4 10 5 100 1000 10 4 10 5 1 if d X is not a square modulo p Prob(p Π jump (X)) =? 1 otherwise p Why?!?