Photosynthetic limitations in response to water stress. and recovery in Mediterranean plants with different growth forms

Research Photosynthetic limitations in response to water stress Blackwell Publishing Ltd and recovery in Mediterranean plants with different growth forms Jeroni Galmés, Hipólito Medrano and Jaume Flexas Grup de Recerca en Biologia de les Plantes en Condicions Mediterrànies, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Carretera de Valldemossa Km 7.5, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain Summary Author for correspondence: Jeroni Galmés Tel: +34 971 259556 Fax: +34 971 173184 Email: jeroni.galmes@uib.es Received: 2 January 2007 Accepted: 24 February 2007 Whether photosynthesis is limited during water stress and recovery because of diffusive or biochemical factors is still open to debate, and apparent contradictions appear when various studies on species with different growth forms are compared. Ten Mediterranean species, representing different growth forms, were subjected to different levels of water stress, the most severe followed by rewatering. A quantitative limitation analysis was applied to estimate the effects of water stress on stomatal (S L, mesophyll conductance (MC L and biochemical limitations (B L. Results confirmed a general pattern of photosynthetic response to water stress among C 3 plants when stomatal conductance (g s is used as a reference parameter. As g s values decreased from a maximum to approx. 0.05 mol H 2 O m 2 s 1, the total photosynthetic limitation rose from 0 to approx. 70%, and this was caused by a progressive increase of both S L and MC L limitations, while B L remained negligible. When lower values of g s were achieved (total photosynthetic limitation increased from 70 to 100%, the contribution of S L declined, while MC L still increased and B L contributed significantly (20 50% to the total limitation. Photosynthetic recovery of severely stressed plants after rewatering showed a dominant role of MC L, irrespective of the degree of photosynthesis recovery. Key words: drought, Mediterranean, mesophyll conductance, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, recovery, rewatering, water stress. New Phytologist (2007 175: 81 93 The Authors (2007. Journal compilation New Phytologist (2007 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02087.x Introduction Low water availability is considered the main environmental factor limiting plant growth and yield in semiarid areas (Boyer, 1982. The water stress-induced limitation on plant growth is mainly caused by reductions in plant carbon balance, which depends on the balance between photosynthesis and respiration (Flexas et al., 2006a. The response of photosynthesis to water stress has received considerable attention in the past, and there has been a long-standing controversy regarding which is the primary limitation on photosynthesis: stomatal closure or metabolic impairment (Chaves, 1991; Lawlor, 1995; Cornic & Massacci, 1996. In recent years, efforts have been made to generalize the responses to water stress of photosynthetic parameters in higher plants (Flexas & Medrano, 2002; Lawlor & Cornic, 2002; Chaves et al., 2003. As a result, there is now some consensus that diffusion limitations on photosynthesis predominate under most water-stress situations. These limitations involve not only stomatal closure, but also decreased mesophyll conductance to CO 2 (, an important but sometimes neglected process (Roupsard et al., 1996; Flexas et al., 2002; Ennahli & Earl, 2005. Regardless of the species www.newphytologist.org 81

82 Research analysed, a general failure of metabolism occurs only when daily maximum stomatal conductance (g s drops below 0.1 mol H 2 O m 2 s 1 (Flexas et al., 2004; Grassi & Magnani, 2005. However, this general response pattern has been tested mostly in crops, and few data are available for natural vegetation of different origins. Because natural environments offer a range of microhabitats and ecological niches, it is likely that particular adaptations can be found, among which exceptions to the general rule may exist (Schulze, 1988. The Mediterranean climate is characterized by a hot, dry period in summer and a cool, wet period in winter, as well as by high interannual variability. The variability and unpredictability of precipitation impose strong constraints on plants and could represent an important evolutionary pressure ( Joffre et al., 1999. As a consequence, natural vegetation from the Mediterranean area seems an appropriate genetic background to search for adaptations that may represent exceptions to the established pattern of photosynthesis response to water stress. The natural vegetation of the Mediterranean area has developed an array of adaptations to water stress, resultinn a high diversity of growth forms. The vegetation consists of deep-rooted evergreen sclerophyll trees and shrubs, which tolerate and/or avoid water stress and maintain green leaves during the summer drought period; semideciduous shrubs, which lose some of their leaves during summer; and geophytes and winter annual and biennial herbs, which escape drought by finishing their annual cycle before summer (Ehleringer & Mooney, 1983. In addition to this diversity of morpho-phenological forms, there is a strong diversity in ecophysiological traits that are likely to be of adaptive value, such as the specificity factor of Rubisco (Galmés et al., 2005a; the response of relative growth rate and its components to water stress (Galmés et al., 2005b; or leaf water relations and stomatal control (Galmés et al., 2006. A primary objective of the present study was to test the generality of the pattern of photosynthetic response to water stress described above, using the natural plant diversity of the Mediterranean area. While gas-exchange analysis of photosynthetic limitations under water stress in Mediterranean plants has been investigated previously in evergreen sclerophyll and summer semideciduous shrubs (Tenhunen et al., 1985; Harley et al., 1986; Harley et al., 1987a, 1987b; Gulías et al., 2002; Peña-Rojas et al., 2004, none of these studies took variations in into account, therefore conclusions from these studies regarding biochemical limitations must be viewed with care. On the other hand, the carbon balance of a plant enduring a water-stress period may depend as much on the rate and degree of photosynthetic recovery as on the rate and degree of photosynthetic decline during water depletion. While many studies have addressed different aspects of photosynthetic limitations during water-stress imposition, analyses of the photosynthetic limitations during photosynthetic recovery after water stress are scarce (Miyashita et al., 2005; Flexas et al., 2006a. An early study by Kirschbaum (1987, 1988 suggested that photosynthesis during recovery was colimited by incomplete stomatal opening and a metabolic component. Recently, Ennahli & Earl (2005 have suggested that limited recovery of photosynthetic biochemistry was the most important limitation for photosynthetic recovery in cotton plants subjected to severe water stress. Therefore another objective of the present work was to perform an analysis of photosynthetic limitations after rewatering different species exposed to severe water stress. In particular, in view of the recently highlighted importance of decreased in the regulation of photosynthesis during water stress, we test the hypothesis that limited recovery of after rewatering may contribute to incomplete recovery of photosynthesis. Materials and Methods Plant material Ten Mediterranean species occurring naturally in the Balearic Islands were selected for this study (Table 1, representative of different growth forms and leaf habits: two evergreen sclerophyll shrubs (Pistacia lentiscus and Hypericum balearicum, two evergreen sclerophyll semishrubs (Limonium gibertii and Limonium magallufianum, three summer semideciduous shrubs (Lavatera maritima, Phlomis italica and Cistus albidus, two perennial herbs (Beta maritima ssp. maritima and B. maritima ssp. marcosii, and an annual herb (Diplotaxis ibicensis. Plants were grown outdoors at the University of the Balearic Islands (Mallorca, Spain in pots (25 l, 40 cm high containing a 40 : 40 : 20 mixture of clay-calcareous soil, horticultural substrate (peat and pearlite (granulometry A13. The experiment was performed in five rounds, each with a pair of the species at the same time. Plant ages at time of measurement differed because of the different life cycles of the species selected. Plants of P. lentiscus, H. balearicum, C. albidus, P. italica and L. maritima were 3 yr old; plants of L. magallufianum and L. gibertii were 1.5 yr old; and plants of D. ibicensis, B. maritima ssp. marcosii and B. maritima ssp. maritima were 6 months old at the onset of the experiments. Four weeks before starting the experiment, 10 plants per species were placed in a controlled growth chamber with a 12-h photoperiod (26 C day: 20 C night and a photon flux density at the top of the leaves of approx. 600 µmol m 2 s 1. Plants were irrigated daily with 50% Hoagland s solution. Measurements corresponding to control treatments were made during the first day of the experiment, when all the plants were well watered. Thereafter, irrigation was stopped in five plants for each species. Pots were weighed every day to determine the amount of water loss. The water available for plants with respect to the control was determined after measurement of soil dry weight in four samples representative of the substrate mixture used in the experiment. Measurements were made on days 4, 8 and 13 17 after the last irrigation, when plants were subjected to mild, moderate and severe New Phytologist (2007 175: 81 93 www.newphytologist.org The Authors (2007. Journal compilation New Phytologist (2007

Research 83 Table 1 Species studied, family and brief description Species Family Description Diplotaxis ibicensis Pau Brassicaceae Annual herb, endemic to the Balearic Islands and inhabiting a few coastal locations. Beta maritima L. ssp. marcosii A. Juan & Chenopodiaceae Perennial herb. Endemic to the Balearic Islands, inhabiting a few small M. B. Crespo islets subjected to strong saline spray. Beta maritima L. ssp. maritima Chenopodiaceae Perennial herb inhabiting coastal ecosystems. Widespread in Mediterranean and temperate climates. Lavatera maritima Gouan Malvaceae Semi-deciduous shrub up to 2 m, densely covered with hairs. Inhabits coastal locations. Phlomis italica L. Labiatae Semi-deciduous shrub up to 1 m, densely covered with hairs. Endemic to the Balearic Islands. The biggest populations are found 500 m above sea level, where they coexist with C. albidus. Cistus albidus L. Cistaceae Semi-deciduous shrub up to 1 m. Commonly found in the Mediterranean garigue. Leaves densely covered with hairs. Hypericum balearicum L. Guttiferae Woody evergreen shrub up to 2 m, endemic to the Balearic Islands. Largest populations found in the garigue 500 m above the sea level, where it competes with P. lentiscus. Pistacia lentiscus L. Anacardiaceae Woody evergreen shrub up to 5 m, commonly found in the Mediterranean garigue. Limonium magallufianum L. Llorens Plumbaginaceae Woody evergreen semishrub, in cushion-like rosettes. Endemic to the Balearic Islands, inhabiting just one coastal marsh located in Magalluf, Mallorca. Limonium gibertii (Sennen Sennen Plumbaginaceae Woody evergreen semishrub, in cushion-like rosettes. Occurrinn west Mediterranean rocky and sandy coastal areas. water stress, respectively. Severe water stress was considered to be when stomatal conductance (g s was close to zero, which was achieved 13 17 d after withholding water, depending on the species. At this time, pots were rewatered to field capacity, and the extent of photosynthesis recovery was determined on the next day. Control plants were watered daily throughout the experiment and measured every 5 6 d to ensure they had maintained constant values. Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were measured on attached leaves using a portable pulse amplitude modulation fluorometer (PAM-2000, Walz, Effeltrich, Germany. For each sampling time and treatment, six measurements were made on different plants. A measuring light of approx. 0.5 µmol photon m 2 s 1 was set at a frequency of 600 Hz to determine, at predawn, the background fluorescence signal (F 0. To obtain maximum fluorescence (F m, saturation pulses of approx. 10 000 µmol photon m 2 s 1 were applied for 0.8 s. The maximum quantum efficiency of PSII was calculated as F v /F m = (F m F o /F m. At mid-morning, the steady-state fluorescence signal (F s and the steady-state maximum fluorescence yield ( F m were determined on the same leaves measured at predawn, using an actinic photon flux density approx. 1500 µmol m 2 s 1. The PSII photochemical efficiency ( F/ F m, Genty et al., 1989 was then calculated as: F/ F = ( F F/ F m m s m Eqn 1 and used for calculation of the relative linear electron transport rate (ETR according to Krall & Edwards (1992: ETR = F/ F PPFD αβ m Eqn 2 where PPFD is the photosynthetically active photon flux density, α is the leaf absorptance, and β is the distribution of absorbed energy between the two photosystems. β was assumed to be 0.5 (the actual factor has been described as ranging between 0.4 and 0.6; Laisk & Loreto, 1996. Leaf absorptances were determined for all 10 species in 10 replicates on leaves of well irrigated plants, using a spectroradiometer coupled to an integration sphere (UniSpec, PP-Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA. A value of 0.84 was obtained for all species, except for C. albidus and P. italica (0.74 and 0.77, respectively. Potential changes in leaf absorptance with water stress were not assessed but, because changes in chlorophyll content were nonsignificant (data not shown, they were assumed to be small and to induce no important biases in the calculations of ETR. Gas-exchange measurements Light-saturated net CO 2 assimilation rates (A N and stomatal conductance (g s were measured at mid-morning on attached, fully developed young leaves of four to five plants per species The Authors (2007. Journal compilation New Phytologist (2007 www.newphytologist.org New Phytologist (2007 175: 81 93

84 Research and treatment, using a gas-exchange system (Li-6400, Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA equipped with a light source (6200-02B LED, Li-Cor. Environmental conditions in the leaf chamber consisted of a photosynthetic photon flux density of 1500 µmol m 2 s 1, a vapour pressure deficit of 1.0 1.5 kpa, an air temperature of 25 C and an ambient CO 2 concentration (C a of 400 µmol mol 1 air. After inducing steady-state photosynthesis, the photosynthesis response to varying substomatal CO 2 concentration (C i was measured. The C a was lowered stepwise from 360 to 50 µmol mol 1 and then returned to 360 µmol mol 1 to reestablish the initial steady-state value of photosynthesis. The C a was then increased stepwise from 360 to 1500 µmol mol 1. Gas-exchange measurements were determined at each step after maintaining the leaf for at least 5 min at the new C a. Measurements consisted of 12 13 measurements for each curve. A N C i curves were transformed to A N C c curves, as described in the following section. Estimations of CO 2 concentration at the site of carboxylation and mesophyll conductance From combined gas-exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, the CO 2 concentration in the chloroplasts (C c was calculated according to Epron et al. (1995. This model works on the assumption that all the reducing power generated by the electron transport chain is used for photosynthesis and photorespiration, and that chlorophyll fluorescence gives a reliable estimate of the quantum yield of electron transport. Thus the ETR measured by chlorophyll fluorescence can be divided into two components: ETR = ETR A + ETR P Eqn 3 where ETR A is the fraction of ETR used for CO 2 assimilation, and ETR P is the fraction of ETR used for photorespiration. ETR A and ETR P can be solved from data of A N, the rate of nonphotorespiratory CO 2 evolution in the light (R L and ETR, and from the known stochiometries of electron use in photosynthesis and photorespiration, as follows (Epron et al., 1995; Valentini et al., 1995: ETR A = 1/3(ETR + 8(A N + R L ; ETR P = 2/3(ETR 4(A N + R L Eqn 4 The ratio ETR A to ETR P is related to the C c /O ratio in the chloroplast (where O represents the oxygen molar fraction at the oxygenation site through the Rubisco specificity factor τ, as follows (Laing et al., 1974: τ = (ETR A /ETR P /(C c /O Eqn 5 Using the values of τ previously determined in vitro for each species (Galmés et al., 2005a, and assuming O to be equal to the molar fraction in the air, the above equation was solved for C c. The mesophyll conductance to CO 2 was then calculated as: = A N /(C i C c Eqn 6 In principle, combined gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence should be performed simultaneously and over the same leaf area (Warren, 2006. We could not do this during the experiments, as the chlorophyll fluorescence head of the Li-6400 was not available at that time. However, the values may be comparable as they were taken at saturating light, one immediately after the other. We have previously shown (Flexas et al., 1998 that light-saturated values of ETR depend little on possible slight variations of ambient factors affecting g s, such as vapour-pressure deficit or leaf temperature, and even on variations of g s itself, unless the changes are strong. As the measurements were made one immediately after the other, and inside a growth chamber with controlled environmental conditions, it is unlikely that environmental conditions between the two measurements had changed enough to induce variations in ETR. Later, and in several species not included in the present study, we have measured ETR using both the PAM-2000 and the Li-6400 equipped with the 6400-40 leaf-chamber fluorometer, finding no significant differences between them whenever light was saturating (data not shown. Another key point concerning the validity of the estimations of is the accuracy of the estimated values of τ and R L. We are quite confident of the values used for τ, as these were determined in vitro for each species (Galmés et al., 2005a. However, many uncertainties have been highlighted regarding mitochondrial respiration in the light, regardless of the method used for its estimation (Harley et al., 1992; Warren, 2006. Nevertheless, Harley et al. (1992 showed that misleading R L estimations effects on are of importance only when is high. In this sense, we have selected the species with the highest, L. maritima, to check the importance of possible R L deviations for. To cope with the overall range of treatment-based variability, the analysis has been made considering two single measurements, one corresponding to a well watered plant and the other to a severely stressed plant. Under- and overestimations of R L by 50 and 150% were assessed (Table 2. As shown in Table 2, a 50% change of R L suggests a change in of only up to 8.3% in well watered plants, and even less in stressed plants. Therefore important biases on R L would not lead to critical errors in estimations in the ranges obtained in the present study. Finally, it is worth mentioning that the method of Epron et al. (1995 used here, and the variable chlorophyll fluorescence method of Harley et al. (1992, resulted in almost identical values (data not shown, but the former was preferred because values of Rubisco specificity factor were obtained directly for each species by Galmés et al. (2005a (as in Epron New Phytologist (2007 175: 81 93 www.newphytologist.org The Authors (2007. Journal compilation New Phytologist (2007

Research 85 Table 2 Assessment of the influences of the rate of nonphotorespiratory CO 2 evolution in the light (R L deviations on the mesophyll conductance estimations ( for Lavatera maritima Parameter A N (µmol CO 2 m 2 s 1 ETR (µmol e m 2 s 1 R L measured (µmol m 2 s 1 L. maritima well watered 33.3 270 1.3 R L measured 50% R L 150% R L (mol m 2 s 1 0.488 0.458 0.528 Percentage change with respect to R L measured 6.9 8.3 L. maritima severe water stress 4.2 131 1.3 R L measured 50% R L 150% R L (mol m 2 s 1 0.032 0.031 0.033 Percentage change with respect to R L measured 2.5 2.8 The analysis considers two single measurements corresponding to a well watered plant and a severely stressed plant. Net photosynthetic rates (A N and electron transport rates (ETR are also shown for each measurement. et al., 1995, and not derived from CO 2 photocompensation point estimations (as in Harley et al., 1992. Quantitative limitation analysis At ambient CO 2 concentration, light-saturated photosynthesis is generally limited by substrate availability, which was verified by A N C i curves in the present data for each species and treatment (not shown. Under CO 2 -limited conditions, photosynthesis can be expressed as (Farquhar et al., 1980: A N = ((V c,max C c /(C c + K c (1 + O/K o (1 (Γ*/C c R LEqn 7 where V c,max is the maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco, K c and K o are the Michaelis Menten constants for CO 2 and O 2, respectively, and Γ* is the CO 2 compensation point in the absence of mitochondrial respiration. Estimations of V c,max were derived from A N C c curves. The treatment average of Γ* for the species was obtained, according to Brooks & Farquhar (1985: Γ* = 0.5O/τ Eqn 8 from specific τ-values for each species (Galmés et al., 2005a. K c, K o and their temperature dependencies were taken from Bernacchi et al. (2002. R L was calculated for the A N C i curve from the same treatment, as given by Grassi & Magnani (2005. To compare relative limitations on assimilation caused by water stress, photosynthetic limitations were partitioned into their functional components following the approach proposed by Grassi & Magnani (2005. This approach, which requires the measurement of A N, g s, and V c,max, makes it possible to partition photosynthesis limitations into components related to stomatal conductance (S L, mesophyll conductance (MC L and leaf biochemical characteristics (B L, assuming that a reference maximum assimilation rate can be defined as a standard. The maximum assimilation rate, concomitantly with g s and V c,max, was reached under well watered conditions, therefore the control treatment was used as a reference. Calculations of (and therefore V c,max calculations may be impaired if heterogeneous stomatal closure affects C i calculations significantly (Laisk, 1983; Beyschlag et al., 1992. This may impair the application of limitation analysis. However, the effect of heterogeneous stomatal closure is negligible for g s values above 0.03 mol H 2 O m 2 s 1 (Flexas et al., 2002; Grassi & Magnani, 2005. In the present study, values lower than 0.03 mol H 2 O m 2 s 1 were obtained only under severe water stress, and in some of the species analysed (see Results and Discussion. Even in these cases, estimations were considered a good approximation of actual values because: (i C c calculations are unaffected by C i in the model of Epron et al. (1995; and (ii at low values of, the results are much less affected by errors in C i. For instance, under severe water stress treatment, with a g s of 0.017 mol H 2 O m 2 s 1, L. magallufianum showed an A N of 1.6 µmol CO 2 m 2 s 1, an ETR of 148 µmol e m 2 s 1, and a C i of 222 µmol mol 1 (Table 3. Patchy stomatal closure usually results in some overestimation of C i (Terashima, 1992. Even in the case of 50% overestimation of the measured C i, the differences between were no greater than 0.015 mol H 2 O m 2 s 1, very small compared with control values (approx. 0.120 mol CO 2 m 2 s 1, which may produce only a 15% difference in the calculated MC L, S L and B L (Table 3. Statistical analysis Regression coefficients between g s and A N, ETR, and V c,max were calculated with the 8.0 SIGMAPLOT software package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA. Differences between means were revealed by Duncan analyses (P < 0.05 performed with the SPSS 12.0 software package (SPSS. The Authors (2007. Journal compilation New Phytologist (2007 www.newphytologist.org New Phytologist (2007 175: 81 93

86 Research Table 3 Assessment of the influences of substomatal CO 2 concentration (C i estimations on the mesophyll conductance ( and photosynthetic limitations for Limonium magallufianum Parameter C i measured C i 50% (mol CO 2 m 2 s 1 0.010 0.025 S L 28 37 MC L 33 18 B L 28 33 S L, stomatal limitation; MC L, mesophyll limitation; B L, biochemical limitation. A possible overestimation of C i by 50% because of heterogeneous stomatal closure was considered, to analyse how much it would affect limitation calculations. Values for the main photosynthetic parameters were as follows: net photosynthetic rate (A N, 1.6 µmol CO 2 m 2 s 1 ; stomatal conductance (g s, 0.077 mol H 2 O m 2 s 1 ; electron transport rate (ETR, 148 µmol e m 2 s 1 ; substomatal CO 2 concentration (C i, 222 µmol mol 1 air. Results Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis responses to water stress and recovery The response of leaf water potential (Ψ and relative water content (RWC to water stress and recovery during this experiment has been reported previously (Galmés et al., 2006. In most species, both Ψ and RWC decreased progressively but slightly from control to moderate water stress, followed by a larger decrease at severe water stress. Three of the species (D. ibicensis and the two Limonium spp. showed almost isohydric behaviour (very small, usually nonsignificant changes in Ψ throughout the experiment, while the other seven species showed a marked anisohydric behaviour (progressive decreases in Ψ as water stress intensified (Table 4. The day after rewatering, the recovery of leaf water status was almost complete in all species except C. albidus and P. lentiscus, which showed only approx. 50% recovery. Despite the observed interspecific differences in water potential and relative water content, all 10 species showed a gradual decline in net photosynthesis (A N as water stress intensified, starting at mild water stress, except for the two Beta spp. (Fig. 1. V c,max followed a different pattern, maintaining values similar to those in irrigated plants under mild-tomoderate water stress, depending on the species, and declining thereafter (Fig. 1. Both stomatal (g s and mesophyll ( conductances to CO 2 declined progressively as water stress intensified (Fig. 2. Remarkably, under irrigation was equal to or smaller than g s for all the species analysed, although the differences became smaller as water stress intensified. By 24 h after rewatering all parameters showed some recovery, although its extent largely depended on the species, from almost null (e.g. P. lentiscus to almost complete (e.g. L. maritima. Table 4 Maximum (under control conditions and minimum (under severe water stress conditions predawn leaf water potential (Ψ PD for the 10 selected species (data from Galmés et al., 2007 Species Maximum Ψ PD (MPa Minimum Ψ PD (MPa Diplotaxis ibicensis 0.43 ± 0.03 1.00 ± 0.11 Beta maritima ssp. marcosii 0.33 ± 0.01 3.34 ± 0.10 B. maritima ssp. maritima 0.333 ± 0.01 3.738 ± 0.09 Lavatera maritima 0.41 ± 0.05 3.54 ± 0.25 Phlomis italica 0.33 ± 0.01 5.00 ± 0.01 Cistus albidus 0.513 ± 0.04 4.117 ± 0.56 Hypericum balearicum 0.38 ± 0.01 2.97 ± 0.16 Pistacia lentiscus 0.300 ± 0.03 4.550 ± 0.45 Limonium magallufianum 0.53 ± 0.03 1.38 ± 0.14 Limonium gibertii 0.550 ± 0.03 1.050 ± 0.09 To see whether these data fitted the photosynthetic response pattern usually described for C 3 plants (Flexas et al., 2002, 2004, the above parameters, as well as the ETR, were plotted against g s pooling all species together (Fig. 3. For the entire range of g s, a decline in g s resulted in a proportional decline in A N, and a strong relationship was found between both variables (Fig. 3a. The ETR plot presented larger scattering because of the large variability in maximum ETR values among species (Fig. 3b. The mesophyll conductance to CO 2 ( was related linearly to g s when pooling all species together, although B. maritima ssp. marcosii appeared to follow a somewhat curvilinear pattern (Fig. 3c. Regarding V c,max (Fig. 3d, the pattern resembled that of ETR, except that interspecific differences in the maximum values were not so large. None of the species analysed presented a decline in V c,max until g s dropped below approx. 0.10 0.15 mol H 2 O m 2 s 1, and in both Limonium spp. even lower g s values were required before V c,max declined. Photosynthetic limitations during water-stress imposition The responses described above relate qualitatively water stress-induced variations in some photosynthetic parameters to water stress-induced reductions in A N. A quantitative relationship can be obtained through a limitation analysis (Jones, 1985; Grassi & Magnani, 2005. The results are shown in Table 5. At mild water stress (as well as at moderate water stress in L. maritima and the two Limonium spp., the biochemical limitations (B L were negligible, and the sum of stomatal (S L and mesophyll conductance (MC L limitations accounted for the entire photosynthetic limitation. In some species, such as L. maritima and the two Limonium spp., S L was much more important than MC L at mild to moderate water stress. In other species, such as C. albidus, H. balearicum and P. lentiscus (the most sclerophyll species, MC L was much larger than S L. In the remaining species, both limitations were New Phytologist (2007 175: 81 93 www.newphytologist.org The Authors (2007. Journal compilation New Phytologist (2007

Research 87 Fig. 1 Net photosynthetic rate (A N, and maximum velocity of carboxylation (V c,max, under different irrigation treatments: control (CO, mild water stress (MiWS, moderate water stress (MoWS, severe water stress (SeWS and rewatering (RW. Values are means ± SE of four to five replicates per species and treatment. Fig. 2 Stomatal conductance (g s, and mesophyll conductance (, under different irrigation treatments: control (CO, mild water stress (MiWS, moderate water stress (MoWS, severe water stress (SeWS and rewatering (RW. Values are means ± SE of four to five replicates per species and treatment. of similar magnitude. At moderate-to-severe water stress, S L was still the most important limitation on photosynthesis only in L. maritima. In most species, MC L was the most important limitation at severe water stress, although in some (D. ibicensis, B. maritima ssp. marcosii and ssp. maritima, L. magallufianum, B L was of similar magnitude. As shown previously (Grassi & Magnani, 2005, the evolution of these limitations with water stress was closely correlated with g s (Fig. 4a, and B L became detectable only when g s dropped below 0.05 010 mol H 2 O m 2 s 1, a situation where MC L was the most important limitation on photosynthesis. Limitations on photosynthesis recovery after a water-stress period In the present study, we analysed the recovery of photosynthesis 24 h after rewatering severely water-stressed plants, The Authors (2007. Journal compilation New Phytologist (2007 www.newphytologist.org New Phytologist (2007 175: 81 93

88 Research Fig. 3 Relationship between stomatal conductance (g s and (a net photosynthetic rate (A N ; (b electron transport rate (ETR; (c mesophyll conductance ( ; (d maximum rate of carboxylation (V c,max. Values from rewatering treatment are not included. Regression coefficients and significance of each relationship are shown. Values are means ± SE of four to five replicates per species and treatment. Symbols and species:, Diplotaxis ibicensis;, Beta maritima ssp. marcosii;, B. maritima ssp. maritima;, Limonium magallufianum;, Limonium gibertii;, Phlomis italica;, Lavatera maritima;, Cistus albidus;, Hypericum balearicum;, Pistacia lentiscus. in which g s and A N were strongly depressed. The extent of recovery of photosynthesis was species-dependent, ranging from < 10% of control values in P. lentiscus to almost 70% in L. maritima (Table 6. In general, and with the exception of L. maritima, herbs showed the largest recovery (49 64%, semideciduous an intermediate recovery (21 42%, and evergreens the lowest recovery (10 29%. Regarding the mechanisms limiting photosynthetic recovery after severe water stress, the different extents in recovery of A N were accompanied by different extents in recovery of either g s, or V c,max (Figs 1, 2. However, the limitation analysis revealed that MC L was, by far, the strongest limitation on photosynthesis recovery in all species analysed, with the exception of L. maritima, the species showing the largest recovery. The recovery of biochemical limitations after severe water stress was generally large. Only in P. lentiscus B L still accounted for 32%, but even so, it contributed only to one-third of the total limitation. Remarkably, the relationship between photosynthetic limitations and g s during recovery was not the same as during water-stress imposition (Fig. 4b. While there was still a highly significant relationship between total limitation and g s (A N and g s maintained their coregulation, MC L was the most important limitation at any given g s, while S L and B L were of similar magnitude throughout the entire range. That limited recovery of was the most important limitation on photosynthetic recovery in these species was further highlighted by comparing the relationships between total photosynthetic limitation and partial limitations after rewatering, pooling all species together. The relationship between T L and S L was nonsignificant (Fig. 5a, and that between T L and B L was only marginally significant (Fig. 5b. However, the relationship between T L and MC L was highly significant (Fig. 5c. Discussion The present results show that the 10 Mediterranean plants analysed follow the pattern of photosynthesis response to progressive water stress usually described in C 3 plants (Flexas et al., 2004. Although small differences have been observed between species, they all follow roughly this general pattern, consisting of an early phase of water stress-induced A N decline associated with decreases in g s and, followed by a second phase in which V c,max and ETR decrease to some extent (Flexas et al., 2004. This pattern therefore seems very robust and independent of any possible particular adaptation to Mediterranean conditions. Moreover, it is independent of growth forms and leaf types, as well as of water relations, as it was followed by both isohydric and anisohydric species (Galmés et al., 2006. Therefore, in all the species, regardless of growth form and leaf type, there was a shift from limitations mostly caused by to CO 2 diffusion (S L plus MC L at mild-to-moderate water stress, to a combination of diffusion and biochemical limitations (B L at severe water stress, as suggested by previous studies (Tenhunen et al., 1985; Harley et al., 1986; Harley et al., New Phytologist (2007 175: 81 93 www.newphytologist.org The Authors (2007. Journal compilation New Phytologist (2007

Research 89 Table 5 Limitations of A N, expressed as percentage, under different irrigation treatments: mild water stress (MiWS, moderate water stress (MoWS and severe water stress (SeWS Limitation Treatment Total (T L Stomatal (S L Mesophyll conductance (MC L Biochemical (B L Diplotaxis ibicensis MiWS 17 7 9 1 MoWS 61 29 21 11 SeWS 78 47 16 15 Beta maritima ssp. marcosii MiWS 0 0 0 0 MoWS 40 19 10 11 SeWS 99 18 42 39 B. maritima ssp. maritima MiWS 0 0 0 0 MoWS 32 13 13 6 SeWS 98 21 34 43 Lavatera maritima MiWS 24 18 6 0 MoWS 57 47 9 1 SeWS 87 70 7 10 Phlomis italica MiWS 31 7 24 0 MoWS 68 29 28 11 SeWS 96 22 52 22 Cistus albidus MiWS 15 7 8 0 MoWS 49 15 22 12 SeWS 95 15 52 28 Hypericum balearicum MiWS 24 4 20 0 MoWS 45 10 24 11 SeWS 89 33 38 18 Pistacia lentiscus MiWS 17 5 12 0 MoWS 41 10 21 10 SeWS 94 12 56 26 Limonium magallufianum MiWS 30 20 9 1 MoWS 60 40 19 1 SeWS 89 28 33 28 Limonium gibertii MiWS 12 6 4 2 MoWS 47 34 12 1 SeWS 81 33 30 18 1987a, 1987b; Gulías et al., 2002; Lawlor & Cornic, 2002; Flexas et al., 2004; Peña-Rojas et al., 2004. In contrast to these studies, the present data highlight the importance of as a limiting factor for photosynthesis in Mediterranean plants, as suggested by Niinemets et al. (2005, particularly under water-stress conditions (Roupsard et al., 1996. Limitation by has been suggested as a possible cause of the observed discrepancies between measured water-use efficiency and that estimated with current gas-exchange models in Mediterranean ecosystems (Reichstein et al., 2002. In all the plants studied here, was g s. A smaller than g s has been described in woody plants (Miyazawa & Terashima, 2001; Hanba et al., 2002; Centritto et al., 2003; De Lucia et al., 2003; Peña-Rojas et al., 2004; Warren et al., 2004; Warren & Adams, 2006 although not in all cases (Epron et al., 1995 and it is rarely observed in herbaceous plants (Loreto et al., 1992; De Lucia et al., 2003; Warren et al., 2006. This has been interpreted in terms of the leaf mesophyll anatomy effects on (Syvertsen et al., 1995; Hanba et al., 1999. However, the present data suggest that may be more limiting for photosynthesis than g s in different Mediterranean plants, regardless of their growth form and leaf anatomy. This is consistent with a predominant role of metabolic rather than structural determinants of, such as aquaporins (Flexas et al., 2006b. On The Authors (2007. Journal compilation New Phytologist (2007 www.newphytologist.org New Phytologist (2007 175: 81 93

90 Research Fig. 4 Relationship between limitations of net photosynthetic rate (A N and stomatal conductance (g s considering all 10 species studied. Values obtained from (a mild, moderate and severe water-stress treatments; (b rewatering treatment. The regression coefficient and significance of the relationships between total limitations and stomatal conductance are shown. B L, biochemical limitation; MC L, mesophyll limitation; S L, stomatal limitation; T L, total limitations. Species Limitation Total (T L Stomatal (S L Mesophyll conductance (MC L Biochemical (B L Table 6 Limitations of A N (expressed as percentage 24 h after refilling water in pots at saturation point Diplotaxis ibicensis 47 13 26 8 Beta maritima ssp. marcosii 36 6 26 4 B. maritima ssp. maritima 52 8 36 7 Lavatera maritima 31 22 8 0 Phlomis italica 58 19 26 13 Cistus albidus 78 15 46 18 Hypericum balearicum 71 31 31 9 Pistacia lentiscus 91 13 45 32 Limonium magallufianum 70 17 49 5 Limonium gibertii 78 24 52 2 New Phytologist (2007 175: 81 93 www.newphytologist.org The Authors (2007. Journal compilation New Phytologist (2007

Research 91 Fig. 5 Relationship between total limitation of photosynthesis (T L 24 h after rewatering plants and (a stomatal limitation (S L ; (b biochemical limitation (B L ; (c mesophyll limitation (MC L. Regression coefficients and the significance of each relationship are shown. Symbols and species as in Fig. 3. the other hand, whether the relationship between and g s is linear or curvilinear is an unresolved question (Flexas et al., 2004; Warren et al., 2006, which is important for understanding effects on photosynthetic nitrogen and water-use efficiency under water or salinity stress (Warren et al., 2006. The present results, along with those of Centritto et al. (2003, suggest that linear relationships may be more common, but a curvilinear relationship may be found in some species, such as B. maritima ssp. marcosii or Vitis vinifera (Flexas et al., 2002. The implications of these differences remain to be established. In contrast to photosynthetic limitations during waterstress development, which have been studied intensively over the past 30 yr, photosynthetic limitations during recovery after a water-stress period have received much less attention. Usually photosynthesis recovery after a mild water stress (whenever g s is maintained above 0.15 mol H 2 O m 2 s 1 is rapid (1 d after rewatering and almost complete (Flexas et al., 2006a. In contrast, after severe water stress the recovery of photosynthesis is progressive and slow (lasting from days to weeks and sometimes incomplete (De Souza et al., 2004; Miyashita et al., 2005; Flexas et al., 2006a. In the latter case, it would be interesting to know which are the factors limiting recovery in the short term. However, with the exception of early studies by Kirschbaum (1987, 1988, which did not take into account mesophyll limitations, a detailed photosynthetic limitations analysis, including S L, MC L and B L, has not yet been performed. The present results show that, with the exception of L. maritima, herbs showed the largest recovery, semideciduous species an intermediate recovery, and evergreens the least recovery. This may reflect different adaptations to water-stress periods under Mediterranean conditions. For instance, herbs may experience short water-stress periods during the favourable season, and therefore a capacity for rapid recovery may be important to ensure their carbon-balance requirements before ending their life cycle in late spring. In contrast, evergreens suffer less from short, dry periods during the favourable season because of their large root system (Rambal, 1984; Canadell et al., 1996, but may have to endure a long waterstress period in summer, during which they may rely on more permanent physiological changes precluding rapid recovery (Mittler et al., 2001. The limitation analysis performed for recovery data revealed that, contrary to what is usually assumed (Flexas et al., 2004, the recovery of biochemical limitations after severe water stress was generally large. This result contrasts with recent results of Ennahli & Earl (2005, who showed in cotton that, after severe water stress, recovery 24 h after rewatering was mostly caused by biochemical limitations, while stomatal and mesophyll limitations were almost totally absent. In the 10 species studied here, the main photosynthetic limitation during photosynthesis recovery after a severe stress appears to be mesophyll conductance. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report showing that limited recovery of is the The Authors (2007. Journal compilation New Phytologist (2007 www.newphytologist.org New Phytologist (2007 175: 81 93

92 Research most important factor limiting photosynthesis recovery after a severe water stress. This finding highlights the role of in controlling photosynthesis, and indicates the need for a better understanding of the physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of. Acknowledgements The authors are very grateful to Dr M. Ribas-Carbó for help during experiments. Drs Hans Lambers, Martin A.J. Parry, Fernando Valladares, Javier Gulías and Alfred J. Keys are acknowledged for their helpful comments on a previous version of the manuscript. This work was partly funded by Projects REN2001-3506-CO 2 -O 2 and BFU2005-03102/ BFI (Plan Nacional, Spain. References Bernacchi CJ, Portis AR, Nakano H, von Caemmerer S, Long SP. 2002. Temperature response of mesophyll conductance. Implications for the determination of Rubisco enzyme kinetics and for limitations to photosynthesis in vivo. Plant Physiology 130: 1992 1998. Beyschlag W, Pfanz H, Ryel RJ. 1992. Stomatal patchiness in Mediterranean evergreen sclerophylls phenomenology and consequences for the interpretation of the midday depression in photosynthesis and transpiration. Planta 187: 546 553. Boyer JS. 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science 218: 443 448. Brooks A, Farquhar GD. 1985. Effect of temperature on the CO 2 /O 2 specificity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and the rate of respiration in the light estimate from gas-exchange measurements on spinach. Planta 165: 397 406. Canadell J, Jackson RB, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED. 1996. Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia 108: 583 595. Centritto M, Loreto F, Chartzoulakis K. 2003. The use of low [CO 2 ] to estimate diffusional and non-diffusional limitations of photosynthetic capacity of salt-stressed olive saplings. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 585 594. Chaves MM. 1991. Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation. Journal of Experimental Botany 42: 1 16. Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS. 2003. Understanding plant responses to drought from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology 30: 239 264. Cornic G, Massacci A. 1996. Leaf photosynthesis under drought stress. In: Baker NR, ed. Photosynthesis and the Environment. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 347 366. De Lucia EH, Whitehead D, Clearwater MJ. 2003. The relative limitation of photosynthesis by mesophyll conductance in co-occurring species in a temperate rainforest dominated by the conifer Dacrydium cupressinum. Functional Plant Biology 30: 1197 1204. De Souza RP, Machado EC, Silva JAB, Lagôa AMMA, Silveira JAG. 2004. Photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and some associated metabolic changes in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata during water stress and recovery. Environmental and Experimental Botany 51: 45 56. Ehleringer J, Mooney HA. 1983. Productivity of desert and Mediterranean-climate plants. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H, eds. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. Physiological Plant Ecology, Vol. 12D. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 205 231. Ennahli S, Earl HJ. 2005. Physiological limitations to photosynthetic carbon assimilation in cotton under water stress. Crop Science 45: 2374 2382. Epron D, Godard G, Cornic G, Genty B. 1995. Limitation of net CO 2 assimilation rate by internal resistances to CO 2 transfer in the leaves of two tree species (Fagus sylvatica and Castanea sativa Mill.. Plant, Cell & Environment 18: 43 51. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. 1980. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO 2 assimilation in leaves of C 3 species. Planta 149: 78 90. Flexas J, Medrano H. 2002. Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C 3 plants: stomatal and non-stomatal limitation revisited. Annals of Botany 89: 183 189. Flexas J, Escalona JM, Medrano H. 1998. Down-regulation of photosynthesis by drought under field conditions in grapevine leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25: 893 900. Flexas J, Bota J, Escalona JM, Sampol B, Medrano H. 2002. Effects of drought on photosynthesis in grapevines under field conditions: an evaluation of stomatal and mesophyll limitations. Functional Plant Biology 29: 461 471. Flexas J, Bota J, Loreto F, Cornic G, Sharkey TD. 2004. Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C 3 plants. Plant Biology 6: 269 279. Flexas J, Bota J, Galmés J, Medrano H, Ribas-Carbó M. 2006a. Keeping a positive carbon balance under adverse conditions: responses of photosynthesis and respiration to water stress. Physiologia Plantarum 127: 343 352. Flexas J, Ribas-Carbó M, Hanson DT, Bota J, Otto B, Cifre J, McDowell N, Medrano H, Kaldenhoff R. 2006b. Tobacco aquaporin NtAQP1 is involved in mesophyll conductance to CO 2 in vivo. Plant Journal 48: 427 439. Galmés J, Flexas J, Keys AJ, Cifre J, Mitchell RAC, Madgwick PJ, Haslam RP, Medrano H, Parry MAJ. 2005a. Rubisco specificity factor tends to be larger in plant species from drier habitats and in species with persistent leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 28: 571 579. Galmés J, Cifre J, Medrano H, Flexas J. 2005b. Modulation of relative growth rate and its components by water stress in Mediterranean species with different growth forms. Oecologia 145: 21 31. Galmés J, Flexas J, Savé R, Medrano H. 2007. Water relations and stomatal characteristics of Mediterranean plants with different growth forms and leaf habits: responses to water stress and recovery. Plant and Soil 290: 139 155. Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR. 1989. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 990: 87 92. Grassi G, Magnani F. 2005. Stomatal, mesophyll conductance and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis as affected by drought and leaf ontogeny in ash and oak trees. Plant, Cell & Environment 28: 834 849. Gulías J, Flexas J, Abadía A, Medrano H. 2002. Photosynthetic responses to water deficit in six Mediterranean sclerophyll species: possible factors explaining the declining distribution of an endemic Balearic species (Rhamnus ludovici-salvatoris. Tree Physiology 22: 687 698. Hanba YT, Miyazawa S-I, Terashima I. 1999. The influence of leaf thickness on the CO 2 transfer conductance and leaf stable carbon isotope ratio for some evergreen tree species in Japanese warm temperate forests. Functional Ecology 13: 632 639. Hanba YT, Kogami H, Terashima I. 2002. The effect of growth irradiance on leaf anatomy and photosynthesis in Acer species differinn light demand. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 1021 1030. Harley PC, Loreto F, Di Marco G, Sharkey TD. 1992. Theoretical considerations when estimating the mesophyll conductance to CO 2 flux by the analysis of the response of photosynthesis to CO 2. Plant Physiology 98: 1429 1436. Harley PC, Tenhunen JD, Lange OL. 1986. Use of an analytical model to study limitations on net photosynthesis in Arbutus unedo under field conditions. Oecologia 70: 393 401. Harley PC, Tenhunen JD, Beyschlag W, Lange OL. 1987a. Seasonal photosynthetic rates and photosynthetic capacity in leaves of Cistus New Phytologist (2007 175: 81 93 www.newphytologist.org The Authors (2007. Journal compilation New Phytologist (2007

Research 93 salvifolius, a European Mediterranean semi-deciduous shrub. Oecologia 74: 380 388. Harley PC, Tenhunen JD, Lange OL, Beyschlag W. 1987b. Seasonal and diurnal patterns in leaf gas exchange of Phillyrea angustifolia growinn Portugal. In: Tenhunen JD, Catarino FM, Lange OL, Oechel WC, eds. Plant Response to Stress: Functional Analysis in Mediterranean Ecosystems. NATO ASI Series Vol. G15. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 329 337. Joffre R, Rambal S, Damesin C. 1999. Functional attributes in Mediterranean-type ecosystems. In: Pugnaire FI, Valladares F, eds. Handbook of Functional Plant Ecology. New York: Marcel Dekker, 347 380. Jones HG. 1985. Partitioning stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to photosynthesis. Plant, Cell & Environment 8: 95 104. Kirschbaum MUF. 1987. Water-stress in Eucalyptus pauciflora comparison of effects on stomatal conductance with effects on the mesophyll capacity for photosynthesis, and investigation of a possible involvement of photoinhibition. Planta 171: 466 473. Kirschbaum MUF. 1988. Recovery of photosynthesis from water stress in Eucalyptus pauciflora a process in two stages. Plant, Cell & Environment 11: 685 694. Krall JP, Edwards GE. 1992. Relationship between photosystem II activity and CO 2 fixation in leaves. Physiologia Plantarum 86: 180 187. Laing WA, Ogren WL, Hageman RH. 1974. Regulation of soybean net photosynthetic CO 2 fixation by the interaction of CO 2, O 2 and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase. Plant Physiology 54: 678 685. Laisk A. 1983. Calculation of leaf photosynthetic parameters considering the statistical distribution of stomatal apertures. Journal of Experimental Botany 34: 1627 1635. Laisk A, Loreto F. 1996. Determining photosynthetic parameters from leaf CO 2 exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence (ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase specificity factor, dark respiration in the light, excitation distribution between photosystems, alternative electron transport rate, and mesophyll diffusion resistance. Plant Physiology 110: 903 912. Loreto F, Harley PC, Di Marco G, Sharkey TD. 1992. Estimation of mesophyll conductance to CO 2 flux by three different methods. Plant Physiology 98: 1437 1443. Lawlor DW. 1995. The effects of water deficit on photosynthesis. In: Smirnoff N, ed. Environment and Plant Metabolism. Flexibility and Acclimation. Oxford, UK: BIOS Scientific, 129 160. Lawlor DW, Cornic G. 2002. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 275 294. Mittler R, Merquiol E, Hallak-Herr E, Rachmilevitch S, Kaplan A, Cohen M. 2001. Living under a dormant canopy: a molecular acclimation mechanism of the desert plant Retama raetam. Plant Journal 25: 407 416. Miyashita K, Tanakamaru S, Maitani T, Kimura K. 2005. Recovery responses of photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance in kidney bean following drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 53: 205 214. Miyazawa SI, Terashima I. 2001. Slow development of leaf photosynthesis in an evergreen broad-leaved tree, Castanopsis sieboldii: relationships between leaf anatomical characteristics and photosynthetic rate. Plant, Cell & Environment 24: 279 291. Niinemets U, Cescatti A, Rodeghiero M, Tosens T. 2005. Leaf internal diffusion conductance limits photosynthesis more strongly in older leaves of Mediterranean evergreen broad-leaved species. Plant, Cell & Environment 28: 1552 1566. Peña-Rojas K, Aranda X, Fleck I. 2004. Stomatal limitation to CO 2 assimilation and down-regulation of photosynthesis in Quercus ilex resprouts in response to slowly imposed droughr. Tree Physiology 24: 813 822. Rambal S. 1984. Water-balance and pattern of root water-uptake by a Quercus coccifera evergreen scrub. Oecologia 62: 18 25. Reichstein M, Tenhunen JD, Roupsard O, Ourcival J-M, Rambal S, Miglietta F, Peressotti A, Pecchiari M, Tirone G, Valentini R. 2002. Severe drought effects on ecosystem CO 2 and H 2 O fluxes in three Mediterranean evergreen ecosystems: revision of current hypotheses? Global Change Biology 8: 999 1017. Roupsard O, Gross P, Dreyer E. 1996. Limitation of photosynthetic activity by CO 2 availability in the chloroplasts of oak leaves from different species and during drought. Annales des Sciences Forestieres 53: 243 254. Schulze ED. 1988. Adaptation mechanisms of non-cultivated arid-zone plants: useful lessons for agriculture?. In: Bidinger FR, Johansen C, eds. Drought Research Priorities for the Dryland Tropics. Patancheru, AP, India: ICRISAT, 159 177. Syvertsen JP, Lloyd J, McConchie C, Kriedemann PE, Farquhar GD. 1995. On the relationship between leaf anatomy and CO 2 diffusion through the mesophyll of hypostomatous leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 18: 149 157. Tenhunen JD, Lange OL, Harley PC, Beyschalg W, Meyer S. 1985. Limitations due to water-stress on leaf net photosynthesis of Quercus coccifera in the Portuguese evergreen scrub. Oecologia 67: 23 30. Terashima I. 1992. Anatomy of non-uniform leaf photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research 31: 195 212. Valentini R, Epron D, De Angelis P, Matteucci G, Dreyer E. 1995. In situ estimation of net CO 2 assimilation, photosynthetic electron flow and photorespiration in Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L. leaves: diurnal cycles under different levels of water supply. Plant, Cell & Environment 18: 631 640. Warren CR. 2006. Estimating the internal conductance to CO 2 movement. Functional Plant Biology 33: 431 442. Warren CR, Adams MA. 2006. Internal conductance does not scale with photosynthetic capacity: implications for carbon isotope discrimination and the economics of water and nitrogen use in photosynthesis. Plant, Cell & Environment 29: 192 201. Warren CR, Livingston NJ, Turpin DH. 2004. Water stress decreases the transfer conductance of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziensii seedlings. Tree Physiology 24: 971 979. The Authors (2007. Journal compilation New Phytologist (2007 www.newphytologist.org New Phytologist (2007 175: 81 93