C O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W

Similar documents
F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e

Self-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL

SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT

lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb.

30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS.

P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0.

P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0

TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned.

Budgets: 2007 planning budgets

-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED)

MICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR

JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY

LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH

HARVEST COSTS COLOR ING LABUR COLORING ADVERTISING NET ring EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST OT AL VARIABLE CUST. 3. INCUME AbOVE VAR1AbLfc COSTS

BARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ

TEXAS UPPER GULF COAST

COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT

TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE,

Background and Assumptions

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0.

C3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR

Background and Assumptions

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions

Eastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions

PROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308.

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions

PICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL

Background & Assumptions

Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions

ENCY 0.8S SALVAGE REPAIR YEARS PROP OF PROP

Background and Assumptions

Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions

OF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI.

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions

D A I R Y P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D P R A I R I E R E G I C N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C O W WITH SILAGE

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions

Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291

Total llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I

Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area

Southwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices

Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area

U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model

FUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUE.,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE

2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES

UNIT LBS* ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE ACRE HOUR DOL* ACRE BALE ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE

T I M E S L A B O R OVER HOURS

COW-CALF PROOUCTION TEXAS GRAND PRAIRIF REGION FROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER COW NATIVE RANGE UNIT CWT. CWT. CWT.

TEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST

Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON

TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch

World Agricultural Outlook Board Interagency Commodity Estimates Committee Forecasts. Lockup Briefing April 10, 2013

EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs

RICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS

RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS

PROJECTICNS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO mlthout UPDATING AFTER 11/05/80.

N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, NUHBER OF UNITS

RICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS

1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington

Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009

2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide

rw^vr! h1 t\v?vc - hlrr TEXAS EL PASO ! L ' _ \.V

SOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS

ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY

Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs

BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS

Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment

Corn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets

Projections for Planning Purposes Only. Not to be Used without Updating after March 17, 1986.

EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County

PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/20/81.

Economics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone

Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs

2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre. by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst

Delaware County Census Data

PEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS

PROJECTED YOUR NUMBER UNIT SIZE 5 / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E TOTAL LIVESTOCK INVESTMENT $ U. 4 _. 5 " TOTAL UNITS UNIT 6.0 CWT.

COTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS

Mercer County Census Data (10% Sample)

COTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS

The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State

Economic Impacts of Agriculture and Forestry in Tennessee, 2009

J J ) " '- ACRE L SO DAYS

UNIT CWT, LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR OOL. TON TON ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE CWT

EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County

Economic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms

Economic Impacts of Agriculture and Forestry in Tennessee, 1997

. BALE 3S.OO CtlT BU BU ACRE 8.00 CUT CHTo 0.25 ACRE 10.OO

Transcription:

r r TEXAS I5LACKLAND FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Blackland Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment of local producers, county Extension agents-agriculture, financial insti tution representatives, farm machinery dealers and others knowledgeable of the area. Variation in yields, production inputs and production practices should be expected for particular farms. Budgets for all major crops produced in the area are included for two levels of management, when applicable. Crop yields are directly related to levels of management. These differences are due largely to timing of operational practices which may not be evident in the budgets. The machinery inventory is applicable to both typical and high level management. In some bud gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned. Budgets for establishing permanent type pasture grasses were prepared and used for prorating estab lishment costs in the respective pasture and hay budgets. Forage crops include expenses only be cause it is expected that the income will be derived from livestock enterprises. Land charges were based on the customary land lord's crop share less his proportionate share of certain production and harvesting inputs. A per acre land charge was made when crop share was not used.

C O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W I TEW WEIGHT UNIT P R I C E O R QUANTITY VALUE OR EACH COST/UNIT COST G R O S S R E C E I P T S STEER CALVES HEIFER CALVES CULL COWS TOTAL 4.30 4.00 9.00 CWT. CWT. CUT. 50.00 40.00 25.00 0.40 0. 2 8 0. 10 86.00 45.28 -. -J2Z*5JD 153.78 VA R I A B L E C O S T S COASTAL PASTURE N AT LV E PA S T U R E HAY PROTEIN SUPP.20% SALT MINERALS VET MEDICINE MISC EXPENSE MARKETING MACHINERY(FUEL.LUBE.REP) E Q U E P M E N T < F U E L. L U B E. R E P ) L A B O R. T R A C T O R f c M A C H I N E R Y LABOR, EQUIPMENT LABOR. LIVESTCCK INTEREST ON CPER.CAP., T C TA L VA R I A E L E C C S T S 3. I N C O M E A E O V E V A R I A B L E C O S T S 4. FIXED COSTS COASTAL PASTURE N AT I V E PA S T U R E I N T. C N L I V E S T O C K C A P I T A L INT. ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR. ON BEEF BULL FUR. DEPR. ON OTHER EQUIP. O T H E R F C. M A C h & E Q U I P. TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TOTAL CCSTS ACRE 24.17 1. 15 27.80 ACRE 1.00 3.45 3.45 CWT. 2.50 7.45 18.62 CVkT. 7.70 0.65 6.54 CWT. 12.80 0.42 5.38 HEAD 3.65 1.00 3.65 HEAD 5.50 1 ooo 5.50 HEAD 4.77 0.76 3.72 DOL. 10.37 DOL. 2.01 HRS. 2.50 3.06 7.66 HRS. 2.50 0.53 1.32 HRS. 2.50 4.95 12. 37 DCL. 0.09 51.97 4_jt 8. 113.07 40.71 DOL. 17.55 1.15 20. 18 DCL. 5.36 3.45 18.49 DOL. 0.09 277.40 24.97 DCL. 0. 0 9 160.44 14.44 DCL. 3.03 DCL. 1 1.90 DCL. 12*51 105.52 218.59 NET RETURNS -64.81 2 5 C O W S. 3 H E I F E R, 1 B U L L U N I T. Y E A R R O U N D C A L V I N G. G R A O E G O O D C A L V E S, RAISED REPLACEMENT EVERY 8 YR.. 80% CALF CROP, 2% COW DEATH LOSS. P R E P A R E D B Y C E C I L P A R K E R, T A E X. C O L L E G E S T A T I O N, T E X A S P R O J E C T E D 1 9 7 7-7 8

STCCKER CALF PRODUCTION TEXAS BLACKLANDS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER CALF I TEM WEIGHT UNIT EACH PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS STOCKER STEERS TOTAL 6.25 CWT. 47.00 1.00 2JLa*25. 293.75 VARIABLE COSTS SMALLGRAINPAST. NATIVE PASTURE BULL CALVES 8-10% PRO FEED HAY VET MEDICINE SALE COMM SALT MINERALS DEATH LOSS 3% MACHINERY! FUEL,LUBE.REP J EQUIPMENTiFUEL.LUBE,REP ) LABOR, TRACTOR & MACHINERY LABOR. EQUIPMENT LABOR, LIVESTOCK INTEREST ON OPER.CAP.. TOTAL VARIABLE CCSTS ACRE 57.46 0.67 38.50 ACRE 1.00 0.50 0.50 CWT. 47.00 3.75 176.25 CWT. 5.50 1.00 5.50 CteT. 2.50 4.75 I 1.86 HEAD 2.50 1.00 2.50 HEAD 6.55 1.00 6.55 CfcT. 12.80 0.21 2.69 HEAD 176.25 0.03 5.29 DCL. 6.98 DOL. 0. 38 HRS. 2.50 2.06 5.16 HRS. 2.50 0.09 0.23 HRS. 2.50 3.46 8.6f DCL. 0.C9 137.56. X2L*3_ v 283.43 INCOME ABCVE VARIABLE COSTS 10.32 4. FIXED COSTS S.G. PASTURE NATIVE PASTURE INT. ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR. ON OTHER EGUIF. OTHER FC, MACH & EQUIP. TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TOTAL COSTS ACRE 17.53 0.67 11.75 ACRE 5.36 0.50 2.68 DOL. 0.09 20.74 1.87 DCL. 1.90 DCL. _ - 4. x 3 J. 22.50 305.93 6. NET RETURNS -12. 18 50 STEER UNIT.250 PCUNDS GAIN/STEER.STOCKING RATE 1.5 HEAD/ACRE.NATIVE PASTURE WITH FEED IN NOVEMEER.SWALL GRAIN WINTER PASTURE.DECEMBER-MAY.3 % DEATH LOSS. P R E PA R E D B Y C E C I L PA R K E R, TA E X, C O L L E G E S TAT I O N, T E X A S P R O J E C T E D 1 9 7 7-7 8

D A I R Y P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C O W WITHOUT SILAGE I TEM WEIGHT EACH UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS MILK 1.00 CWT. BULL CALVES 1.00 HEAD BREEDING HEIFERS 1.00 HEAD CULL COWS 13.00 CWT. BULL 1.00 HEAD TCTAL 10.30 15.00 675.00 25.00 500.00 135.00 0.40 0.20 0.22 0.05 1390.50 6. 00 13 5.00 71.50 25*0.5. 1628.00 VARIABLE COSTS GRAIN MIX HAY PASTURE VET MEDICINE BREEDING SUPPLIES MGMT RECORDS UTILITIES HAULING SALT MILK REPLACER MISC EXPENSE MACHINERY!FUEL,LUBE.REP) EQUIPMENT(FUEL.LUBE,REP> LABOR. TRACTOR & MACHINERY LABOR, LIVESTOCK INTEREST ON OPER.CAP.. TOTAL VARIABLE CCSTS INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS FIXED CCSTS LAND CHARGE I N T. O N L I V E S TO C K C A P I TA L INT. ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR. CN DAIRY COW FURCH DEPR. CN OTHER ECUIP. OTHER FC. MACH & EQUIP. TOTAL FIXEC COSTS TOTAL COSTS CWT. 6.50 66.40 4 3 1. 6 0 CWT. 3. 5 0 HI.00 388.50 AUMS 8.50 5.00 42.50 HEAD 11.40 1.00 11.40 HEAD 10.00 1.00 10.00 HEAD 17.00 1.00 17.00 HEAD 10.00 1.00 10.00 HEAD 26.50 1.00 26.50 CWT. 0. 3 5 135.00 47.25 LBS. 0.02 72.00 1.44 LBS. 0.30 40.OC 12.00 DCL. 10.00 1.00 10.00 DCL. 15.23 DOL. 3.48 HRS. 2.50 4.50 11.25 HRS. 2.50 47.60 119.00 DOL. 0.09 475.73 ±2jl&2~. 1 1 9 9. 9 6 428.04 ACRE 10.00 1.00 10.00 DOL. 0.09 959.50 86.35 DOL. 0. 0 9 593.59 53.42 DCL. 11.25 DOL. 85.21 DCL. 3J^0_2_ 278.26 1478.22 6. NET RETURNS 149.77 100 COW DAIRY. 13500 LBS. PRODUCTION PER COW. EARN IS DOUBLE 6 HERRINGBONE. FEEDING OUTSIDE MILKING RARLCR. 25% REPLACEMENT, 3% DEATH LOSS ON COWS P R E PA R E D E Y C E C I L PA R K E R. TA E X, C O L L E G E S TAT I O N. T E X A S P R O J E C T E D 1 9 7 7-7 8

F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I C N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C W ITEM G R O S S R E C E I P T S WEIGHT UNIT EACH P R I C E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY VA L U E O R COST i PIGS TOTAL 50.00 LES. 0. 7 2 16.00. 5Z6. jlq _ 576.OC 2. VARIABLE COSTS SOW FEED GEST. SOW FEED LACT. PIG STARTER BOAR FEED VET. MED (PIGSJ VET. MED (SOWS) SALE COMM MISG EXPENSE MACHINERY(FUEL,LUBE,REP ) E Q U I P M E N T! F U E L. L U B E. R E P * L A B O R, T R A C T O R & M A C H I N E R Y LABOR, EQUIPMENT LABOR, LIVESTOCK INTEREST CN OPER.CAP., T O T A L V A R I A B L E C C S T S I N C O M E A B O V E VA R I A B L E C O S T S CWT. 8.25 9.76 80.52 CWT. 8.25 13.53 1 I 1.62 CWT. 10.30 8.00 82.40 CWT. 8.25 0.89 7.35 HEAD 0.50 16.00 6.00 HEAD 5.63 1.00 5.63 HEAD 1.00 16.00 16.00 HEAD 1.00 16.00 16.00 DOL. 17.26 DCL. 17.78 HRS. 2.50 5. 10 12.75 HRS. 2.50 4.41 11.03 HRS. 2.50 11.40 28.50 DCL. 0.09 149.79 JL^A^fi. 428.33 147.67 FIXEO COSTS LAND RENT DOL I N T. C N L I V E S T O C K C A P I T A L D C L INT. ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DCL DEPR. ON BOAR PURCHASED DOL DEPR. CN OTHER EQUIP. DCL O T H E R F C, M A C H & E G U I P. D O L - TOTAL FIXED CCSTS 5. TOTAL CCSTS 15.00 0.27 4.05 0.09 126.74 1 1.59 0.09 225.63 20.31 7.66 53. 15... 15*21. 111.96 540.29 NET RETURNS 35.71 1 5 S O W U N I T, F A L L - S P R I N G F A R R O W I N G, 5 6 D A Y W E A N I N G, 1 6 P I G S W E A N E D P E R S O W P E R Y E A R, A P P L I C A B L E T O W E L L D R A I N E D S A N O Y S O I L S. P R E P A R E D B Y C E C I L P A R K E R, T A E X. C O L L E G E S T A T I O N, T E X A S P R O J E C T E D 1 9 7 7-7 8

FINISHING HOGS TEXAS BLACKLANDS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER HOG I TEM WEIGHT EACH UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST 1. GROSS RECEIPTS S L A U G H T E R H O G S 2 4 0. 0 0 TGTAL 2. V A R I A B L E C O S T S LBS. 0.40 1.00.S ap_0_ 96.00 FINISHING RATION FEEDER PIGS VET MEDICINE MARKETING MISC EXPENSE DEATH L0SS=2% M A C H I N E R Y ( F U E L. L U B E. R E P ) EQUIPMENT(FUEL.LUBE.REP ) LABiOR. TRACTOR. MACHINERY LABOR. EQUIPMENT LABOR, LIVESTOCK INTEREST ON OPER.CAP.. T C TA L VA R I A B L E C C S T S CWT. LBS. HEAD HEAD HEAD HEAD DCL. DOL. HRS. HRS. HRS. DOL. 8.25 6.65 54.86 0.72 50.00 36.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.50 1.00 1.50 0.75 1.00 0.75 0.72 1.00 0.72 1.27 0.85 2.50 0.37 0. 94 2.50 0. 1 1 0.27 2.50 C.55 1. 38 0.09 36.97 3*33 102.36 3. I N C O M E A B O V E V A R I A B L E C O S T S 4. FIXED COSTS LAND RENT INT. ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR. CN OTHER EQUIP. OTHER FC. MACH & ECUIP. TOTAL FIXED CCSTS 5. TOTAL COSTS -6. 36 DOL. 15.00 0.20 3.00 DCL. 0.09 9.60 0.63 DOL. 1.91 DOL. QjlQJ 6.67 109.03 6. NET RETURNS -13.03 2 4 0 F E D P E R Y E A R. 1 2 0 F E D P E R B U N C H, 3. 5 0 P O U N D S F E E D P E R F O U N D G A I N, 2 X D E AT H L O S S. P R E P A R E D E Y C E C I L P A R K E R, T A E X. C O L L E G E S T A T I O N. T E X A S P R O J E C T E D 1 9 7 7-7 8

TEXAS BLACKLANDS REGION Assumed Prices Paid and Received by Farmers \J Item Unit Price Prices paid (1976) Seed Cottonseed (acid delinted) Grain sorghum Wheat O a t s ( t y p i c a l ) O a t s ( h i g h l e v e l ) Sudangrass Corn Ryegrass Klei ngrass Tarn Wintergreen Harding Ferti Iizer Nitrogen Phosphorous Potassuim Fuel and lubricants G a s o l i n e ( b u l k d e l l v e r y - $. 0 9 t a x r e f u n d ) Diesel Labor Typical management High level management Custom rates Cotton stripping and hauling Combining grain sorghum (7.00 minimum) Hauling grain sorghum C o m b i n i n g w h e a t / o a t s ( t y p i c a l ) Combining wheat/oats (high level) Hauling wheat/oats Comb i n i ng corn Hauling corn Cut, rake and bale hay HauIi ng hay Applying herbicide/insecticide (aerial) Cotton ginning F e r t i l i z e r s p r e a d e r Interest on operating capital pis ga hour hour acre acre bu. bu. bale bale acre acre percent $.35.42.13.10.12.22.43.16 7.50 3.00.20.16.07.41.37 2.00 2.25 1.25.28.17 6.50 7.50.17.17.10.45.20 I.50 1.50 1.75.09

r -2- I tern Unit Price Prices received (1976) Cotton Ii nt Cottonseed Grain Sorghum Corn Wheat Oats Sorghum hay CoastaI hay Oat hay Kleingrass hay ton bu. bu. bu. ton ton ton ton.46 05.00 4.25 2.50 3.50 1.50 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 \J These price assumptions are not to be prospective prices. nterpreted as predictions or

" > ^» TEXAS BLACKLANDS REGION Estimated Machinery and Equipment Cost Per Hour of Use Machinery Purchase Estimated Estimated Fixed Costs Variable Costs Item and Size Price Years of Use Hours of Use Per Hour Per Hour Tractor - 130 HP $15,434 6 4200 $3.87 $5.74 Tractor - 100 HP 13,153 8 4800 3.42 4.34 Tractor - 75 HP 10,737 8 6400 2.10 2.94 Tractor - 40 HP 4,698 12 3600 2.07 2.38 Pickup - 1/2 ton 5,048 4 2800 2.11 3.39 Chisel - 13 feet 1,477 10 1750 1.26.43 Chisel - 19 feet 2,282 10 1750 1.94.67 Cultivator - 13 feet 1,174 10 1500 1.16.47 J Cultivator - 19 feet 2,014 10 1500 2.00.80 ' Disk - 13 feet 1,477 10 1500 1.46.46 Disk - 19 feet 2,483 10 1500 2.47.72 Drill - 11 feet 1,812 10 650 4.15 1.25 Herbicide appl. - 13 feet 336 10 500 1.00.38 Herbicide appl. - 19 feet 403 10 500 1.20.45 Lister/bedder - 13 feet 1,152 10 1500 1.14.43 Lister/bedder - 19 feet 1,610 10 1500 1.60.60 Planter - 13 feet 1,610 10 1000 2.39.96 Planter - 19 feet 2,350 10 1000 3.50 1.40 Shredder - 13 feet 1,534 10 1000 2.29.79 Shredder - 19 feet 3,195 8 800 5.33 1.94 Spike harrow - 15 feeit 450 10 500 1.20.37 Sprayer - 25 feet 905 10 500 2.70.73 Roller - 13 feet 153 10 750.31.09 Roller - 19 feet 218 10 750.43.13