Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes

Similar documents
SPDES driven by Poisson Random Measures and their numerical September Approximation 7, / 42

SPDES driven by Poisson Random Measures and their numerical Approximation

Jump-type Levy Processes

Infinitely divisible distributions and the Lévy-Khintchine formula

SPDES driven by Poisson Random Measures and their numerical Approximation

Lévy Processes and Infinitely Divisible Measures in the Dual of afebruary Nuclear2017 Space 1 / 32

Translation Invariant Experiments with Independent Increments

Existence and Comparisons for BSDEs in general spaces

Poisson random measure: motivation

PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS

Lecture 22 Girsanov s Theorem

Filtrations, Markov Processes and Martingales. Lectures on Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus, Braunschweig, Lecture 3: The Lévy-Itô Decomposition

On Minimal Entropy Martingale Measures

Probability and Random Processes

Itô isomorphisms for L p -valued Poisson stochastic integrals

Tyler Hofmeister. University of Calgary Mathematical and Computational Finance Laboratory

Stochastic Analysis. Prof. Dr. Andreas Eberle

Hardy-Stein identity and Square functions

PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS

STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS DRIVEN BY PROCESSES WITH INDEPENDENT INCREMENTS

CIMPA SCHOOL, 2007 Jump Processes and Applications to Finance Monique Jeanblanc

Definition: Lévy Process. Lectures on Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus, Braunschweig, Lecture 2: Lévy Processes. Theorem

ELEMENTS OF PROBABILITY THEORY

Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes for geophysical data analysis

Brownian Motion. 1 Definition Brownian Motion Wiener measure... 3

Stochastic Processes

Stochastic Processes. Winter Term Paolo Di Tella Technische Universität Dresden Institut für Stochastik

Summable processes which are not semimartingales

Numerical Methods with Lévy Processes

Optimal investment strategies for an index-linked insurance payment process with stochastic intensity

Random Process Lecture 1. Fundamentals of Probability

Fourier analysis, measures, and distributions. Alan Haynes

1. Stochastic Process

Multivariate Generalized Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Processes

A BAYES FORMULA FOR NON-LINEAR FILTERING WITH GAUSSIAN AND COX NOISE

Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimator for the growth rate for a jump-type CIR process

Feller Processes and Semigroups

Functional Limit theorems for the quadratic variation of a continuous time random walk and for certain stochastic integrals

ON ADDITIVE TIME-CHANGES OF FELLER PROCESSES. 1. Introduction

STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS FOR JUMP PROCESSES

Lecture 21 Representations of Martingales

Brownian motion. Samy Tindel. Purdue University. Probability Theory 2 - MA 539

SEQUENTIAL TESTING OF SIMPLE HYPOTHESES ABOUT COMPOUND POISSON PROCESSES. 1. Introduction (1.2)

Selected Exercises on Expectations and Some Probability Inequalities

An introduction to Lévy processes

Manual for SOA Exam MLC.

HJB equations. Seminar in Stochastic Modelling in Economics and Finance January 10, 2011

Wiener Measure and Brownian Motion

Infinitely Divisible Cylindrical Measures on Banach Spaces

Exponential Distribution and Poisson Process

Exponential functionals of Lévy processes

ST5215: Advanced Statistical Theory

On pathwise stochastic integration

1 Infinitely Divisible Random Variables

Nonlinear Lévy Processes and their Characteristics

INVARIANCE TIMES. Laboratoire de Mathématiques et Modélisation d Évry and UMR CNRS Évry Cedex, France

Analysis of Probabilistic Systems

Elementary Probability. Exam Number 38119

Density models for credit risk

LAN property for ergodic jump-diffusion processes with discrete observations

LogFeller et Ray Knight

Exponential martingales: uniform integrability results and applications to point processes

Applications of Ito s Formula

When is a Moving Average a Semimartingale?

A Change of Variable Formula with Local Time-Space for Bounded Variation Lévy Processes with Application to Solving the American Put Option Problem 1

Markov Chain Approximation of Pure Jump Processes. Nikola Sandrić (joint work with Ante Mimica and René L. Schilling) University of Zagreb

Let (Ω, F) be a measureable space. A filtration in discrete time is a sequence of. F s F t

Point Process Control

Dynamics of the evolving Bolthausen-Sznitman coalescent. by Jason Schweinsberg University of California at San Diego.

Exercises. T 2T. e ita φ(t)dt.

Nonlinear Filtering with Lévy noise

Delay differential equations driven by Lévy processes: stationarity and Feller properties

Lectures 16-17: Poisson Approximation. Using Lemma (2.4.3) with θ = 1 and then Lemma (2.4.4), which is valid when max m p n,m 1/2, we have

Martingale Representation, Chaos Expansion and Clark-Ocone Formulas

Stable Lévy motion with values in the Skorokhod space: construction and approximation

Martingale Problems. Abhay G. Bhatt Theoretical Statistics and Mathematics Unit Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi

The multidimensional Ito Integral and the multidimensional Ito Formula. Eric Mu ller June 1, 2015 Seminar on Stochastic Geometry and its applications

A NOTE ON STOCHASTIC INTEGRALS AS L 2 -CURVES

Random Fields: Skorohod integral and Malliavin derivative

GARCH processes continuous counterparts (Part 2)

. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω. Friday April 1 ± ǁ

Harnack Inequalities and Applications for Stochastic Equations

Learning Session on Genealogies of Interacting Particle Systems

Chapter 2. Poisson Processes. Prof. Shun-Ren Yang Department of Computer Science, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan

Bayes spaces: use of improper priors and distances between densities

Nonlinear representation, backward SDEs, and application to the Principal-Agent problem

THE MALLIAVIN CALCULUS FOR SDE WITH JUMPS AND THE PARTIALLY HYPOELLIPTIC PROBLEM

The Wiener Itô Chaos Expansion

Notes on Measure, Probability and Stochastic Processes. João Lopes Dias

Multi-Factor Lévy Models I: Symmetric alpha-stable (SαS) Lévy Processes

Optimal cash management using impulse control Peter Lakner and Josh Reed New York University. Abstract

{σ x >t}p x. (σ x >t)=e at.

Jump Processes. Richard F. Bass

1* (10 pts) Let X be a random variable with P (X = 1) = P (X = 1) = 1 2

Stochastic integration. P.J.C. Spreij

INVARIANT MANIFOLDS WITH BOUNDARY FOR JUMP-DIFFUSIONS

Exercises in stochastic analysis

STAT331 Lebesgue-Stieltjes Integrals, Martingales, Counting Processes

Study of Dependence for Some Stochastic Processes

Tools of stochastic calculus

Transcription:

Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes Erika Hausenblas University of Salzburg, Austria Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.1

Outline Hellinger distances Poisson Random Measures The Main Result The Change of Measure formula Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.2

The Kakutani Hellinger Distance Let (Θ, B) be a measurable space. Definition 1 Let α (0,1). For two σ finite measures P 1 and P 2 on (Θ, B) we define H α (P 1,P 2 ) = ( dp1 dp ) α ( dp2 dp ) 1 α, and h α (P 1,P 2 ) = Θ dh α (P 1,P 2 ), where P is a σ finite measure such that P 1,P 2 P. We call H α (P 1,P 2 ) the Hellinger-Kakutani inner product of order α of P 1 and P 2. The total mass of H α (P 1,P 2 ) is written as h α (P 1,P 2 ) = Θ dh α (P 1,P 2 ). Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.3

The Kakutani Hellinger Distance Remark 1 The definition of the Kakutani Hellinger affinity H is independent from the choice of P, as long as P 1,P 2 P holds. Definition 2 Let α (0,1). For two σ finite measures P 1 and P 2 on (Θ, B) we define and K α (P 1,P 2 ) = αp 1 + (1 α)p 2 H α (P 1,P 2 ), k α (P 1,P 2 ) = Θ dk α (P 1,P 2 ), The latter we call the Kakutani-Hellinger distance of order α between P 1 and P 2. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.4

The Kakutani Hellinger Distance Some Applications: Statistics of Random processes (Jacod and Shirayev, Griegelionis (2003)) Application to Contiguity ( Shirayev and Greenwood (1985)) Application to the Likelihood Ratio, Information theory (Vajda (2006), Liese and Vajda (1987)); A measure of Bayes estimator (Vajda, Liese and Vajda) Application to Risk Minimization (Vostrikova) Application in Martingale measures (Keller, 1997). Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.5

The Kakutani Hellinger Distance Some Properties: h α (P 1,P 2 ) = 0 P 1 and P 2 are singular; Suppose that (Ω i, F i ), 1 i n, are measurable spaces and P 1 i and P 2 i, probability measures on (Ω i, F i ), 1 i n. Then h1 2 ( n i=1 Pi 1, n i=1pi 2 ) n = i=1 h1 2 ( P 1 i,pi 2 ). Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.6

The Lévy Process L Assume that L = {L(t),0 t < } is a R d valued Lévy process over (Ω; F; P). Then L has the following properties: L(0) = 0; L has independent and stationary increments; for φ bounded, the function t Eφ(L(t)) is continuous on R + ; L has a.s. cádlág paths; the law of L(1) is infinitely divisible; Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.7

The Lévy Process L The Fourier Transform of L is given by the Lévy - Hinchin - Formula: E e i L(1),a = exp { i y,a λ + R d (e iλ y,a 1 iλy1 { y 1} ) where a R d, y E and ν : B(R d ) R + is a Lévy measure. } ν(dy), Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.8

The Lévy Process L Definition 3 (see Linde (1986), Section 5.4) A σ finite symmetric Borel-measure ν : B(R d ) R + is called a Lévy measure if ν({0}) = 0 and the function ( ) E a exp (cos( x,a ) 1) ν(dx) C R d a is a characteristic function of a certain Radon measure on R d. An arbitrary σ-finite Borel measure ν is a Lèvy measure if its symmetrization ν + ν is a symmetric Lévy measure. a ν(a) = ν( A) for all A B(R d ) Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.9

Poisson Random Measure Let L be a Lévy process on R with Lévy measure ν over (Ω, F, P). Remark 2 Defining the counting measure B(R) A N(t,A) = {s (0,t] : L(s) = L(s) L(s ) A} one can show, that N(t,A) is a random variable over (Ω, F, P); N(t,A) Poisson(tν(A)) and N(t, ) = 0; For any disjoint sets A 1,...,A n, the random variables N(t,A 1 ),...,N(t,A n ) are pairwise independent; Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.10

Poisson Random Measure Definition 4 Let (S, S) be a measurable space and (Ω, A, P) a probability space. A random measure on (S, S) is a family η = {η(ω, ),ω Ω} of non-negative measures η(ω, ) : S R +, such that η(, ) = 0 a.s. η is a.s. σ additive. η is independently scattered, i.e. for any finite family of disjoint sets A 1,...,A n S, the random variables η(,a 1 ),...,η(,a n ) are independent. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.11

Poisson Random Measure A random measure η on (S, S) is called Poisson random measure iff for each A S such that Eη(,A) is finite, η(,a) is a Poisson random variable with parameter E η(, A). Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.12

Poisson Random Measure A random measure η on (S, S) is called Poisson random measure iff for each A S such that Eη(,A) is finite, η(,a) is a Poisson random variable with parameter E η(, A). Remark 3 The mapping is a measure on (S, S). S A ν(a) := E P η(,a) R Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.12

Poisson Random Measure Let (Z, Z) be a measurable space. If S = Z R +, S = Z ˆ B(R + ), then a Poisson random measure on (S, S) is called Poisson point process. Remark 4 Let ν be a Lévy measure on a Banach space E and S = Z R + S = Z ˆ B(R + ) ν = ν λ (λ is the Lebesgue measure). Then there exists a time homogeneous Poisson random measure η : Ω Z B(R + ) R + such that E η(,a,i) = ν(a)λ(i), A Z,I B(R + ), ν is called the intensity of η. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.13

Poisson Random Measure Definition 5 Let E be a topological vector space and η : Ω B(E) B(R + ) R + be a Poisson random measure over (Ω; F; P) and {F t, 0 t < } the filtration induced by η. Then the predictable measure γ : Ω B(E) B(R + ) R + is called compensator of η, if for any A B(E) the process is a local martingale over (Ω; F; P). η(a, (0, t]) γ(a, [0, t]) Remark 5 The compensator is unique up to a P-zero set and in case of a time homogeneous Poisson random measure given by γ(a, [0, t]) = t ν(a), A B(E). Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.14

Poisson random measures Example 1 Let x 0 R, x 0 0 and set ν = δ x0. Let η be the time homogeneous Poisson random measure on R with intensity ν. Then t t L(t) := 0 R xη(dx,ds), and P(L(t) = kx 0 ) = exp( t) tk k!, k IN. Since R xγ(dx,dt) = x 0 dt, the compensated process is given by t 0 R x η(dx,ds) = L(t) x 0t. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.15

Poisson random measures Example 2 Let α (0,1) and ν(dx) = x α 1. Let η be the time homogeneous Poisson random measure on R with intensity ν. Then t L(t) := t 0 R x η(dx,ds), is an α stable process and E(e λl(t) ) = exp( λt α ). Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.16

Newman s Result (1976) By means of the following formula h1 2 ( n i=1 Pi 1, n i=1pi 2 ) n = i=1 h1 2 ( P 1 i,pi 2 ), where above (Ω i, F i ), 1 i n, are different probability spaces and P 1 i and P 2 i two probability measures, and, since the counting measure of a Lévy process is independently scattered, Newman was able to show the following: Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.17

Newman s Result (1976) Let L 1 and L 2 be two Lévy processes with Lévy measures ν 1 and ν 2. Let Then ν1 2 := H1(ν 1,ν 2 ); 2 a i (t) := R z (ν i ν1 2 ) (dz), i = 1,2; P i : B(ID(R + ; R)) A P(L i + a i A), i = 1,2; where P1 2 ( ) H1(P 1, P 2 ) := exp t k1(ν 1,ν 2 ) P1, 2 2 2 is the probability measure on ID(R + ; R) of the process L1 2. given by the Lévy measure ν1 2 Inoue (1996) extended the result to non time homogeneous, but deterministic Lévy processes. See also Liese (1987). Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.18

Jacod s and Shiryaev s Approach L 1 and L 2 be two semimartingales (here, of pure jump type); P i, i = 1, 2, be the probability measures induced from L 1 and L 2 on ID(R + ; R); Q be a measure such that P 1 Q and P 2 Q. Let z 1 := dp 1 dq, z 1 := dp 2 dq, and for t 0 let z 1 (t) and z 2 (t) be the restriction of z 1 and z 2 on F t. Let Y (t) := (z 1 (t)) 1 2 (z 1 (t)) 1 2, t > 0. Then there exists a predictable increasing process h a 1, called Hellinger process, 2 such that h 1 (0) = 0 and 2 t Y (t) + t 0 Y (s )dh 1(s), 2 is a Q-martingale. (see also Jacod (1989), Grigelionis (1994)) a In terms of Newman, h should be k. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.19

Prm - Bismut s Setting Let (Ω; F; P) a probability space and µ : B(R) B(R + ) IN 0 a Poisson random measure over (Ω; F; P) with compensator γ given by B(R) B(R + ) (A, I) γ(a, I) := λ(a)λ(i). Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.20

Prm - Bismut s Setting Let (Ω; F; P) a probability space and µ : B(R) B(R + ) IN 0 a Poisson random measure over (Ω; F; P) with compensator γ given by B(R) B(R + ) (A, I) γ(a, I) := λ(a)λ(i). Let c : R R be a given mapping such that c(0) = 0 and R c(z) 2 dz <. Then, the measure ν defined by B(R) A ν(a) := R 1 A(c(z)) dz is a Lévy measure and the process L given by t L(t) := t 0 R c(z) (µ γ)(dz, ds), is a (time homogeneous) Lévy process. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.20

Poisson random measures Example 2 Let α (0,1) and η be the time homogeneous Poisson random measure on R with intensity λ. Then t t L(t) := 0 R x 1 α η(dx,ds), is an α stable process. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.21

Main Result - The Setting b i = {b i (s); s R + } are two predictable R d valued processes, c i : Ω R + R d R d, i = 1, 2, be two predictable processes such that t E P 0 R d c i (s, z) 2 dz ds <, and c i (s, z) is differentiable at any z R d := R \ {0}. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.22

Main Result - The Setting b i = {b i (s); s R + } are two predictable R d valued processes, c i : Ω R + R d R d, i = 1, 2, be two predictable processes such that E P t 0 R d c i (s, z) 2 dz ds <, and c i (s, z) is differentiable at any z R d := R \ {0}. X i = {X i (t); t R + }, i = 1, 2, are two R d valued semimartingales given by X i (t) = t 0 R d c i (s, z) (µ γ)(dz, ds) + t 0 b i (s) ds, i = 1, 2, and ν i = {ν i t; t R + } are two unique predictable measure valued processes given by B(R) R + (A, t) ν i t(a) := R d 1 A (c i (t, z)) λ d (dz), i = 1, 2. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.22

The Main Result If then Let νt α := H α (νt 1, νt 2 ) and η α be a random measure with compensator γ α defined by γ α : B(R d ) B(R + ) (A, I) ν I R d s (A) ds. a i t := t z ( ) ν i 0 R d s νs α (dz) ds; Xt α := t 0 z (ηα γ α )(dz, ds) + 1 t 2 0 [b 1(s) + b 2 (s)] ds Q i : B(ID(R +, R d )) A P(X i + a i A), i = 1, 2; t 0 (b 1(s) b 2 (s)) ds = t (c 0 R d 1 (s, z) c 2 (s, z)) dz ds, dh α (Q 1 t, Q 2 t) = exp ( ) t 0 k α(νs, 1 νs) 2 ds where Q α is the probability measure on ID(R + ; R d ) induced by the semimartingale X α = {X α t ; t R + }. dq α t Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.23

Consequences Let ν 1 and ν 2 two Lévy measures on B(R), and β 1, β 2 (0, 2] two real number such that ν i ((z, )) ν i ((, z)) z β and i z β i = 1, 2. i lim z 0 z>0 lim z 0 z<0 If β 1 β 2 and β 1, β 2 > 1 then k 1 2 (ν 1, ν 2 ) = and, hence, the induced measures on ID(R +, R) of the corresponding Lévy processes are singular. Let ν n i := ν i R\( 1 n, 1 n ), β 1 β 2, and L n t be the corresponding Lévy processes, i = 1, 2. Then, for any n, the induced probability measures probability measures P n i on ID(R +, R) (shifted by a drift term) are equivalent, but the measures P i, i = 1, 2, given by P i := lim n P n i are singular. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.24

Jacod s and Shiryaev s Approach L 1 and L 2 be two semimartingales (here, of pure jump type); P i, i = 1, 2, be the probability measures induced from L 1 and L 2 on ID(R + ; R); Q be a measure such that P 1 Q and P 2 Q. Let z 1 := dp 1 dq, z 1 := dp 2 dq, and for t 0 let z 1 (t) and z 2 (t) be the restriction of z 1 and z 2 on F t. Let Y (t) := (z 1 (t)) 1 2 (z 1 (t)) 1 2, t > 0. Then there exists a predictable increasing process h a 1, called Hellinger process, 2 such that h 1 (0) = 0 and 2 t Y (t) + t 0 Y (s )dh 1(s), 2 is a Q-martingale. (see also Jacod (1989), Grigelionis (1994)) a In terms of Newman, h should be k. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.25

Change of Measure Formula A random measure η on (S, S) is called Poisson random measure iff for each A S such that Eη(,A) is finite, η(,a) is a Poisson random variable with parameter E η(, A). Remark 6 The mapping is a measure on (S, S). S A ν(a) := E P η(,a) R specifying the intensity ν specifying P on (Ω, F). Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.26

Change of measure formula (Bichteler, Gravereaux and Jacod) Define a bijective mapping θ : R a R possible z z + sgn(z) z 1 2 a R := R \ {0}. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.27

Change of measure formula (Bichteler, Gravereaux and Jacod) Define a bijective mapping θ : R R possible z z + sgn(z) z 1 2 Define a new Poisson random measure µ θ given by B(R) B(R + ) (A,I) µ θ (A,I) := χ A (θ(z)) µ(dz,ds). I R R := R \ {0}. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.27

Change of measure formula (Bichteler, Gravereaux and Jacod) Define a bijective mapping θ : R R possible z z + sgn(z) z 1 2 Define a new Poisson random measure µ θ given by B(R) B(R + ) (A,I) µ θ (A,I) := χ A (θ(z)) µ(dz,ds). I R Define a new probability measure P θ on (Ω; F) by saying: µ θ has compensator γ = λ λ. R := R \ {0}. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.27

Change of measure formula B(R) B(R + ) (A,I) µ θ (A,I) := I R χ A (θ(z)) µ(dz,ds). Let B(R) B(R + ) (A,B) γ θ (A,I) = I A J a ( θ)(z) λ(dz)λ(ds). and B(R) B(R + ) (A,B) γ θ 1(A,I) = I A J( (θ) 1 )(z) λ(dz)λ(ds). The following can be shown: µ has compensator γ under P. µ θ has compensator γ under P θ. µ has compensator γ θ under P θ. µ θ has compensator γ θ 1 under P. a J denotes the Jacobian determinant. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.28

Change of measure formula For t 0 let P(t) and P θ (t) be the restriction of P and P θ on F t. Then Radon Nikodym derivative is given by dp θ (t) dp(t) = G θ(t); where G θ is the Doleans Dade exponential of ζ θ, where ζ θ is given by dζ θ (t) = A (J( θ(z)) 1) (µ γ)(dz,ds), ζ θ (0) = 0. In the following the Doleans Dade exponential of a process X is denoted by E(X). Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.29

Change of measure formula Remark 7 The same idea works also, if is predictable. θ : Ω R + R d R d Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.30

Proof of the Theorem - The Setting b i = {b i (s); s R + } are two predictable R d valued processes, c i : Ω R + R d R d, i = 1, 2, be two predictable processes such that E P t 0 R d c i (s, z) 2 dz ds <, and c i (s, z) is differentiable at any z R d := R \ {0}. X i = {X i (t); t R + }, i = 1, 2, are two R d valued semimartingales given by X i (t) = t c 0 R d i (s, z) (µ γ)(dz, ds) + t 0 b i(s) ds, i = 1, 2, and ν i = {ν i t; t R + } are two unique predictable measure valued processes given by B(R) R + (A, t) ν i t(a) := R d 1 A (c i (t, z)) λ d (dz), i = 1, 2. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.31

Proof of the Theorem Let c : Ω R + R d R d be defined by c(s, z) := 1 2 [c 1(s, z) + c 2 (s, z)] and X 0 = {Xt 0, 0 t < } be the semimartingale given by Let θ i (s, z) := t 0 t Xt 0 := c(s, z) (µ γ) (dz, ds). R d c 1 (s, c i (s, z)), z R d, s R +, 0 z = 0, s R +, i = 1, 2, J ( z θ i (s, z)), z R d, s R +, and j i (s, z) := 0 z = 0, s R + i = 1, 2. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.32

Proof of the Theorem For i = 1, 2 let P i be the probability measure on (Ω, F) under which the Poisson random measure µ θ defined by µ i θ(a, I) := 1 A (θ i (s, z)) µ(dz, ds) I R d has compensator γ. Then P i ( {X 0 t A} ) = P ( {ξ i t A} ), A B(R d ), t 0, where ξ i t := t 0 R d c i (s, z) (µ γ)(dz, ds) + t 0 R d (c i (s, z) c(s, z)) dz ds, t 0. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.33

Proof of the Theorem Let P t, P 1 t, and P 2 t, be the restriction of P, P 1, and P 2, respectively, on F t. Then, we can calculate for any α (0, 1) the process H α (t) := ( ) dp 1 α ( dp 1 dp dp ) 1 α directly, by the knowledge of the Radon Nikodym derivative and the Ito formula. In fact, dp i dp = Gi (t), where G θ = E(ζ i ), where ζ θ is given by dζ i (t) = A (J( θ i(s, z)) 1) (µ γ)(dz, ds), ζ i (0) = 0. Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.34

The end Thank you for your attention! Change of Measure formula and the Hellinger Distance of two Lévy Processes p.35