Flood Risk Analysis. Depth Dependent Cost Estimation for Urban Areas. Alvaro Fonseca and Mia Holmbo Lind, Grontmij Denmark

Similar documents
Vulnerability of Bangladesh to Cyclones in a Changing Climate

Climate Risk Visualization for Adaptation Planning and Emergency Response

Draft for Discussion 11/11/2016

Climate Change and Mapping of the Future Nature

AHEAD OF THE STORM: Extreme Weather Resilience in the City of Toronto

GIS and Governing Anchorage. GIS Critical for Efficient, Transparent Government How is GIS Program Doing Where can GIS Program Take us

1994: JV formed for civil engineering consultancy COWI/KX A/s, Denmark(51%) IFU, Denmark (24% ) IL&FS Infrastructure Dev Corp, India(25%)

Applying Hazard Maps to Urban Planning

Table-Top Exercise for Emergency Preparedness Evaluation: Little Anse, Isle Madame

Extreme Weather Events and Transportation Asset Management

The impact of the open geographical data follow up study Agency for Data Supply and Efficiency

Sustainable and Harmonised Development for Smart Cities The Role of Geospatial Reference Data. Peter Creuzer

Exploring the costs of sea level rise: should we focus on means or extremes?

1The Many Uses of GIS

The UN-GGIM: Europe core data initiative to encourage Geographic information supporting Sustainable Development Goals Dominique Laurent, France

Randall W. Parkinson, Ph.D., P.G. Institute of Water and Environment Florida International University

What the Science Tells Us & How Practitioners Can Use the Science

New Jersey Department of Transportation Extreme Weather Asset Management Pilot Study

Disaster Management in Republic of Korea

ECRA General Assembly 2019

GIS AND REMOTE SENSING FOR OPEN SPACE PROTECTION ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT

Page G Crow Wing County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2017

Mapping a Nation in 3D Singapore s Journey. Bryan Chew Registrar of Titles Assistant Chief Executive Singapore Land Authority

Ground Water Protection Council 2017 Annual Forum Boston, Massachusetts. Ben Binder (303)

Empowering water/wastewater network management with GIS

Report on the impact of open geographical data - Danish effect studies -

Timeframe. Crow Wing County, Baxter, Brainerd, Breezy Point, Crosby, Crosslake, Cuyuna, Deerwood, Emily, Fifty

User s Guide to Storm Hazard Maps and Data

Spatial units (Levels 0 and 1)

06/04/2015. Overview: Spatial units. Advancing the SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting Spatial units (Level 1)

Mapping of Future Coastal Hazards. for Southern California. January 7th, David Revell, Ph.D. E.

Crystal Goodison & Alexis Thomas University of Florida GeoPlan Center

Spatial Units (Level 1)

Jim Fox. copyright UNC Asheville's NEMAC

From Vulnerability to Resilience And the Tools to Get There. Out of Harm s Way Partnership for the Delaware Estuary August 1, 2012

How GIS can be used for improvement of literacy and CE programmes

Geospatial natural disaster management

Earthquakes. & Expansive Soils

Abstract. Keywords: Geographic information systems and digital data model. 1. Introduction

Innovation in Land Management: Integrated Solutions For National Cadastre Projects

Sea Level Rise Study Summary Town of South Bethany

Spatial Units, Scaling and Aggregation (Level 1) October 2017

ArcGIS Pro: Essential Workflows STUDENT EDITION

Florida Flood Risks. Heavy Rainfall. Groundwater. Tidal Flooding. Storm Surge. King Tides. Runoff/Riverine

ICA/EuroSDR NMA workshop Amsterdam 3-4 dec Anders Færch-Jensen Hanne Mortensen Esben Taudorf

HURRICANE MATTHEW A GIS PERSPECTIVE GLYNN COUNTY GIS

Application of high-resolution (10 m) DEM on Flood Disaster in 3D-GIS

Write a report (6-7 pages, double space) on some examples of Internet Applications. You can choose only ONE of the following application areas:

Candidate Name Centre Number Candidate Number CHANGING PHYSICAL AND HUMAN LANDSCAPES SAMPLE ASSESSMENT MATERIALS

Sea-Level Rise Impacts on South Florida

Extreme Weather and Risks to Infrastructure. Heather Auld & Neil Comer Risk Sciences International

Land Accounts - The Canadian Experience

Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

Exploring GIS Potential for Northwestern Ontario Land Information Ontario

Jordan's Strategic Research Agenda in cultural heritage

Prepared by: Ryan Ratcliffe GPH-903 December 10, 2011

Local EPM Implementation Process in 5 stages

Between Art and Nature

Disaster Risk Assessment: Opportunities for GIS and data management with Open DRI

Impact Policies Enabling Value Enhancement of Geospatial Information in Canadian Economy and Society

The Climate of the Carolinas: Past, Present, and Future - Results from the National Climate Assessment

Flood Map. National Dataset User Guide

Programmatic Approaches to Assessing and Mitigating Risk to Pipelines from Natural Forces

Making maps: Traditions and perceptions in Europe. European spatial planning and cartographic representations

Grant 0299-NEP: Water Resources Project Preparatory Facility

Addresses, administrative units and place names

Roles of NGII in successful disaster management

Analys av GIS-användning inom offentlig sektor i Norden

Tools to Assess Flood Risk of Commercial Property Investment

Hurricane Readiness for Coastal Communities

2 nd Semester. Core Courses. C 2.1 City and Metropolitan Planning. Module 1: Urban Structure and Growth Implications

[CLUB NAME] HURRICANE ACTIVATION PLAN [EXCERPT VERSION]

Kenneth Melchert (Senior Statistician - Regional Liaison Officer)

SUPPORTS SUSTAINABLE GROWTH

ENV208/ENV508 Applied GIS. Week 1: What is GIS?

The AIR Tropical Cyclone Model for India

Table G - 6. Mitigation Actions Identified for Implementation by the City of Kent ( ) (From Wilkin County Master Mitigation Action Chart)

USING MIKE TO MODEL COASTAL CATASTROPHE RISK

EO Information Services. Assessing Vulnerability in the metropolitan area of Rio de Janeiro (Floods & Landslides) Project

CHAPTER 4 HIGH LEVEL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (SDF) Page 95

Floods 2014 a wake up call to natural hazards

Canadian Board of Examiners for Professional Surveyors Core Syllabus Item C 5: GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Services.

Planning Road Networks in New Cities Using GIS: The Case of New Sohag, Egypt

ArcGIS. for Server. Understanding our World

Flood intelligence an international collaborative case study. Karin Geraghty, CIO, DEWNR

IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

Introduction. Project Summary In 2014 multiple local Otsego county agencies, Otsego County Soil and Water

Coastal Vulnerability to Multiple Inundation Sources

Wetland & Floodplain Functional Assessments and Mapping To Protect and Restore Riverine Systems in Vermont. Mike Kline and Laura Lapierre Vermont DEC

Challenges in providing effective flood forecasts and warnings

Study Visit University of Applied Sciences Utrecht Netherlands

Geological Survey of Canada Lands and Minerals Sector Natural Resources Canada OneGeology, June 2018

Delta Flood Protection Strategy Update. May 16, 2016

Environmental Management Information System (EMIS)

REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING IN SOUTH CENTRAL CONNECTICUT. Association of State Floodplain Managers Conference June 13, 2013 Hartford, CT

Assessing the Vulnerability of Tennessee Transportation Assets to Extreme Weather

CLAREMONT MASTER PLAN 2017: LAND USE COMMUNITY INPUT

E-Government and SDI in Bavaria, Germany

"GIS-Sofia" Ltd. geospatial data integration in SOFCAR geographic information system and providing services March 2018, Sofia

Transcription:

Flood Risk Analysis Depth Dependent Cost Estimation for Urban Areas Alvaro Fonseca and Mia Holmbo Lind, Grontmij Denmark Copyright 2015 Grontmij A/S CVR 48233511

Grontmij: Engineering Consultancy 1 Business Lines Planning & Design Transportation & Mobility Water & Energy 9 main markets 100 offices world wide 3 business lines 6,000 employees 70,000 projects a year

Agenda 1. Background 2. Grontmij Flood Risk Concept 3. Methods 4. Results and Discussion 5. Perspectives 6. Questions? Copyright 2015 Grontmij A/S CVR 48233511

Background Copyright 2015 Grontmij A/S CVR 48233511

Background National Context Denmark 4 Climate Change Adaptation Plans All municipalities ought to map risk Standard risk maps based on building values not sufficient New FREE Danish Geodata From 1 st January 2013 almost all geodata available online Could the new free geodata be used in mapping risk? Joined Development Project Grontmij A/S, Ishøj Municipality and Ishøj Utility Company Photo: Mathias Øgendal

Background Ishøj adapting to Climate Change (2013) 5 Problem Coastal municipality (Baltic Sea) Vulnerable to storm surges and sea level rise Urban flooding In 2007, 2009, 2011 and 2014 Combined/Separate sewage system Important assets Harbour with Modern Art Museum Historic village Protected buildings Bronze age relics Burial mounts

Grontmij Flood Risk Concept Copyright 2015 Grontmij A/S CVR 48233511

Concept Framework for Flood Risk Assessment 7 Flood Risk Flood Risk Hazard Mapping Hazards Vulnerability Hydro-dynamic modelling Flooding Probability Extent and Depth GIS-based Risk Model Physical impact Expected Annual Damage (EAD) Intangible cost Vulnerability Which areas are flooded? What s the impact? GIS-based Risk model Risk maps Cost-benefit perspectives Adapted from Zhou (2012) Zhou, Q. 2012. Urban drainage design and climate change adaptation decision making. PhD Thesis DTU Environment Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark.

Concept Conceptual GIS Model 8 Hazards Rainwater and seawater Extend, depth and frequency Vulnerable assets and cost estimation Buildings and other landscape features Hotspots Representative Areas Sewage catchments EAD summarized Prioritizing initiatives Hazard maps GIS-based Risk Model Expected Annual Damage (EAD) Vulnerable Monetized Assets

Methods Copyright 2015 Grontmij A/S CVR 48233511

Methods Hazard mapping 10 Urban Drainage Model 3-D model results (MIKE Flood) Sea level rise model Provided as free geodata Based on a detailed DTM Information from flood maps Depth Extent Frequency Return Periods (T, years) T = 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 Photo: Mathias Øgendal

Methods Vulnerable Landscape Features and Assets 11 Selected features Roads Parks and natural areas Churches and graveyards Technical facilities Historical relics Buildings Cadastre Records (not free) lookup for basements Hotspots Hospitals, data centres, protected buildings etc.

Methods Cost Estimation 12 Buildings Value estimated from public property valuation Damage costs in % of total value based on flood depth, e.g. 40 cm water = 10% of value Other layers Estimated damage cost per m 2 Hotspots Appointed by Ishøj municipality and utility company Cost estimation based on latest insurance cost after flooding events Provided by the umbrella organization for the insurance companies Depths Buildings w/ basement Buildings w/o basement Buildings - no evaluation record Industrial buildings Roads, park and sports facilities (cleanup) Rails, techfacilities*, relics* and graveyards* Nature (stewardship) cm % of value % of value DKK pr. m 3 DKK pr. m 3 DKK pr. m 3 DKK pr. m 3 DKK pr. m 3 0,3-30 0 2 0 0 0 60 0,02 30-50 10 10 600 1000 10 80 0,04 50-100 30 30 700 1200 30 80 0,06 100-150 40 40 800 1400 40 100 0,08 >150 50 50 1000 1500 40 100 0,1

Methods EAD and Risk Assessment 13 Consolidation E.g. sewage catchments areas Privacy of each house owner protected Expected Annual Damage (EAD) Finding max total cost for each T-event Probability Hazards Extent and Depth Flood Risk Physical impact Vulnerability Intangible cost Risk Assessment Each catchment A resulting map showing which areas where adaptation measures will be initiated GIS-based Risk Model Expected Annual Damage (EAD)

Methods GIS Application 14 Threshold Overlay analysis in Model Builder Raster to vector All flood maps to polygons Layers based on max. depth Threshold height = 30 cm Tools Select by location, Intersect, Merge, etc. Summarizing Iterations over events and depths Five events for rain and sea level: 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 yr Five Depth Intervals

Results and Discussion Copyright 2015 Grontmij A/S CVR 48233511

Results and Discussion Expected Annual Damage 16 Return Period vs EAD Depending on extent and cost Consolidated on areas Validation: plan 2011 and 2013 Solid base for Action Plan EAD for T = 20 yr Area EAD T5 EAD T10 EAD T20 EAD T50 EAD T100 MAX EAD Prio 2011 Prio 2013 Name F1 kr. 79.644.894 kr. 41.842.038 kr. 20.921.019 kr. 8.270.776 kr. 4.167.257 kr. 79.644.894 1 1 Strandområdet J1 kr. 320.052 kr. 825.133 kr. 412.567 kr. 158.605 kr. 84.419 kr. 825.133 2 17 Ishøj Landsby P1 kr. 5.108.820 kr. 4.368.834 kr. 2.184.417 kr. 927.350 kr. 599.307 kr. 5.108.820 3 9 Tranegilde P2 kr. 3.392.324 kr. 2.378.437 kr. 1.189.218 kr. 607.337 kr. 392.917 kr. 3.392.324 4 11 Kolonihaver

Results and Discussion Consolidated and prioritized areas 17 Match between Priority Areas (catchments) and Climate Change Adaptation Investments

Perspectives Copyright 2015 Grontmij A/S CVR 48233511

Perspectives Recommendation and further application 19 Lessons learned Better pre-processing methods Retrieving and preparing geodata Fully automated procedure not achieved Static workflows (small pieces) Model builder not always stable Python cleaning might help? Validation Insurance data from specific historical event Does the used cost estimation add up? Can we update the methods? Application used for other hazards Rising Groundwater (very relevant in DK) Storms

Thank you Questions? CONTACT Alvaro Fonseca Project Manager P +45 4348 4618 E AVF@grontmij.dk www.grontmij.dk CONTACT Mia Holmbo Lind Physical Geographer P +45 43486932 E MIA@grontmij.dk