A formality criterion for differential graded Lie algebras

Similar documents
Kodaira-Spencer formality of products of complex manifolds

Dolbeault cohomology and. stability of abelian complex structures. on nilmanifolds

Abel, Jacobi and the double homotopy fiber

Cohomology jump loci of local systems

Atiyah classes and homotopy algebras

ON COSTELLO S CONSTRUCTION OF THE WITTEN GENUS: L SPACES AND DG-MANIFOLDS

Contributors. Preface

Formality of Kähler manifolds

Differential graded Lie algebras

Generalized Tian-Todorov theorems

Workshop on higher structures December 2016

An overview of D-modules: holonomic D-modules, b-functions, and V -filtrations

On the Virtual Fundamental Class

Hodge Theory of Maps

Techniques of computations of Dolbeault cohomology of solvmanifolds

DELIGNE S THEOREMS ON DEGENERATION OF SPECTRAL SEQUENCES

On the Van Est homomorphism for Lie groupoids

370 INDEX AND NOTATION

Derivations and differentials

PBW for an inclusion of Lie algebras

arxiv:alg-geom/ v2 7 Jan 1998

1 Moduli spaces of polarized Hodge structures.

Algebraic Topology II Notes Week 12

CHAPTER 1. TOPOLOGY OF ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES, HODGE DECOMPOSITION, AND APPLICATIONS. Contents

THE QUANTUM CONNECTION

Lie algebra cohomology

DEFORMATIONS OF ALGEBRAS IN NONCOMMUTATIVE ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY EXERCISE SHEET 1

Fourier Mukai transforms II Orlov s criterion

Coherent sheaves on elliptic curves.

Rational homotopy theory

Deformations of coisotropic submanifolds in symplectic geometry

Koszul duality for operads

Deformations of Coisotropic Submanifolds of Jacobi Manifolds

Matrix factorizations over projective schemes

Hungry, Hungry Homology

Mirror Symmetry: Introduction to the B Model

Patrick Iglesias-Zemmour

arxiv: v3 [math.ag] 16 Dec 2018

Uniruledness criteria and applications to classification and foliations

E 2 01 H 1 E (2) Formulate and prove an analogous statement for a first quadrant cohomological spectral sequence.

Factorization algebras in quantum field theory Volume 2 (28 April 2016) Kevin Costello and Owen Gwilliam

Homotopy-theory techniques in commutative algebra

LECTURE 3 MATH 261A. Office hours are now settled to be after class on Thursdays from 12 : 30 2 in Evans 815, or still by appointment.

Higher Algebra with Operads

On The Formality Theorem for the Differential Graded Lie Algebra of Drinfeld

FAKE PROJECTIVE SPACES AND FAKE TORI

Peter Scholze Notes by Tony Feng. This is proved by real analysis, and the main step is to represent de Rham cohomology classes by harmonic forms.

Formal Homotopy Quantum Field Theories and 2-groups.

8 Perverse Sheaves. 8.1 Theory of perverse sheaves

Quaternionic Complexes

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

HODGE THEORY, SINGULARITIES AND D-MODULES

On algebraic index theorems. Ryszard Nest. Introduction. The index theorem. Deformation quantization and Gelfand Fuks. Lie algebra theorem

Non-uniruledness results for spaces of rational curves in hypersurfaces

GK-SEMINAR SS2015: SHEAF COHOMOLOGY

Iwasawa algebras and duality

Kähler manifolds and variations of Hodge structures

LECTURE 3: RELATIVE SINGULAR HOMOLOGY

The Goldman-Millson theorem revisited

FROM THE FORMALITY THEOREM OF KONTSEVICH AND CONNES-KREIMER ALGEBRAIC RENORMALIZATION TO A THEORY OF PATH INTEGRALS

Lie Algebra Cohomology

(communicated by James Stasheff)

A manifestation of the Grothendieck-Teichmueller group in geometry

Math 231b Lecture 16. G. Quick

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES

An Introduction to Spectral Sequences

Università degli Studi di Padova

THE CLASSICAL HOM-YANG-BAXTER EQUATION AND HOM-LIE BIALGEBRAS. Donald Yau

D-manifolds and derived differential geometry

The Kervaire Invariant One Problem, Talk 0 (Introduction) Independent University of Moscow, Fall semester 2016

Algebraic Cobordism Lecture 1: Complex cobordism and algebraic cobordism

Algebraic Curves and Riemann Surfaces

FANO VARIETIES AND EPW SEXTICS

Hodge Structures. October 8, A few examples of symmetric spaces

Shifted Symplectic Derived Algebraic Geometry and generalizations of Donaldson Thomas Theory

SEPARABLE RATIONAL CONNECTEDNESS AND STABILITY

Lectures 1 and 2: General introduction, DG algebras.

Deformation theory of algebraic structures

Note that the first map is in fact the zero map, as can be checked locally. It follows that we get an isomorphism

Deligne s. Kathryn Hess. Institute of Geometry, Algebra and Topology Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

A Primer on Homological Algebra

Geometry 10: De Rham algebra

An Outline of Homology Theory

Bernhard Keller. University Paris 7 and Jussieu Mathematics Institute. On differential graded categories. Bernhard Keller

A NEW FAMILY OF SYMPLECTIC FOURFOLDS

DONAGI-MARKMAN CUBIC FOR HITCHIN SYSTEMS arxiv:math/ v2 [math.ag] 24 Oct 2006

AFFINE PUSHFORWARD AND SMOOTH PULLBACK FOR PERVERSE SHEAVES

Symplectic algebraic geometry and quiver varieties

De Rham Cohomology. Smooth singular cochains. (Hatcher, 2.1)

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

McGill University Department of Mathematics and Statistics. Ph.D. preliminary examination, PART A. PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS Paper BETA

Realization problems in algebraic topology

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III

Homotopy Lie Algebroids

EILENBERG-ZILBER VIA ACYCLIC MODELS, AND PRODUCTS IN HOMOLOGY AND COHOMOLOGY

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

Hyperkähler geometry lecture 3

Categorification of shifted symplectic geometry using perverse sheaves

The Cartan Decomposition of a Complex Semisimple Lie Algebra

Transcription:

A formality criterion for differential graded Lie algebras Marco Manetti Sapienza University, Roma Padova, February 18, 2014

Deligne s principle (letter to J. Millson, 1986). In characteristic 0, a deformation problem is controlled by a differential graded Lie algebra, with quasi-isomorphic DG-Lie algebras giving the same deformation theory. In 1986 this was considered just a principle, In 1994 evolved to a metatheorem (Kontsevich s Berkeley lectures in deformation theory), Nowadays it is considered a theorem. From now on we consider only fields of characteristic 0.

Definition A DG-vector space is the data of a graded vector space V = V i, i Z, and a (linear) differential d : V i V i+1, d 2 = 0. Definition A DG-Lie algebra is the data of a DG-vector space (L, d) and a (bilinear) bracket [, ]: L i L j L i+j such that: 1. (graded skewsymmetry) [a, b] = ( 1) deg(a) deg(b) [b, a]. 2. (graded Jacobi ) [a, [b, c]] = [[a, b], c] + ( 1) deg(a) deg(b) [b, [a, c]] 3. (graded Leibniz) d[a, b] = [da, b] + ( 1) deg(a) [a, db].

Example: The Kodaira-Spencer DG-Lie algebra of a complex manifold X. Denote by: 1) Θ X the holomorphic tangent sheaf of X. 2) A p,q X the space of differentiable (p, q)-forms on X and Ap,q X (Θ X ) the space of (p, q)-forms with values in Θ X. The Kodaira-Spencer DGLA KS X is by definition the Dolbeault complex 0 A 0,0 X (Θ X ) A 0,1 X (Θ X ) equipped with the natural bracket. By Dolbeault theorem H i (KS X ) = H i (X, Θ X ). Important because it is the DGLA controlling deformations of X

A morphism f : L M of DGLA is a morphism of graded vector spaces commuting with brackets and differentials. A morphism f : L M of DGLA is called a quasi-isomorphism if the induced map f : H i (L) H i (M) is an isomorphism for every i Z. Two DGLA are homotopy equivalent if they are connected by a zigzag of quasi-isomorphisms. It is easy to prove that L, M are homotopy equivalent if and only if there exists a diagram L f H g M with both f, g quasi-isomorphisms of DG-Lie algebras.

Definition A DG-Lie algebra is called formal if is homotopy equivalent to a DGLA with trivial differential. Definition A DG-Lie algebra is called homotopy abelian if is homotopy equivalent to a DGLA with trivial bracket. Remark. A DGLA L is homotopy abelian if and only if it is formal and the bracket is trivial in cohomology. Let X be a complex manifold. By deformation theory, if KS X is homotopy abelian then the semiuniversal deformation space of X is smooth; if KS X is formal then the semiuniversal deformation space is at most a quadratic singularity.

Some examples. 0) KS P n is formal. 1) If X is projective with trivial canonical bundle, then KS X is homotopy abelian (Bogomolov-Tian-Todorov theorem). 2) Let M = T /Γ be the Iwasawa manifold: here T is the Lie group of upper triangular unipotent 3 3 complex matrices and Γ is the subgroup of matrices with Gaussian integers coefficients. Then KS M is formal but not homotopy abelian. 3) Let M as above and Y = M P 1. Then KS Y is not formal. 4) Let S be a complex surface with ample canonical bundle whose universal deformation space is defined by a non trivial cubic equation (it exists by Murphy s law). Then KS S is not formal, although the bracket is trivial in cohomology.

(at least) Three possible proofs of BTT theorem: 1) By Tian-Todorov lemma, i.e., BV-algebra structure on polyvector fields; 2) By derived Griffiths period map (see talks by Di Natale and Fiorenza); 3) By Cartan homotopy formulas and derived brackets. Here we give a sketch of 3).

Let A = (A,, d = + ) be the de Rham complex of a projective manifold X. By -lemma the subcomplex Im is exact. The complexes Hom (A, A)[ 1], M := Hom (ker, coker )[ 1] have DGLA structures induced by the derived (in the sense of Koszul-Voronov) bracket {, }, defined as the graded commutator of the associative product (f, g) f g. The DGLA M is homotopy abelian since the natural map Hom (ker, ker )[ 1] Hom (ker, coker )[ 1] = M is a quasi-isomorphism of DGLA.

Let i : A 0,i (Θ X ) Hom(A p,q, A p 1,q+i ) be the contraction. By Cartan homotopy formulas the induced map i : KS X M is a morphism of DGLA. If X has a holomorphic volume form, then i : KS X M is injective in cohomology. (A 0,i (Θ X ) = Hom(A n,0, A n 1,i ), n = dim X.) Key Lemma. Let f : L M be a morphism of DGLA. If: 1) f : H (L) H (M) is injective; 2) M is homotopy abelian. Then also L is homotopy abelian. Proof. Homotopy classification of L -algebras.

The key lemma is powerful and widely used in deformation theory. Question: does there exists an analogue of key lemma for formality? Beware. If f : L M is injective in cohomology and M is formal, then L may not be formal. (the naive extension does not hold). Need to replace the injectivity of f : H (L) H (M) with a stronger condition.

Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomology. Consider first the case of graded Lie algebras (DGLA with trivial differential). For every DGLA L, its cohomology H (L) is a graded Lie algebra. Given a morphism of graded Lie algebras f : L M, for every fixed integer p there is a sequence of cohomology groups H i (L, M) p, i = 0, 1,... defined as the cohomology of the Chevalley-Eilenberg complex Hom p ( L, M). 0 M p δ Hom p (L, M) δ Hom p (L L, M)

Description (up to some signs) of δ: 0) For m M p we have ±(δm)(x) = [m, f (x)]; 1) For φ Hom p (L, M) we have ±(δφ)(x, y) = [φ(x), f (y)] ( 1) x ȳ [φ(y), f (x)] φ([x, y]); 2) For φ Hom p (L n 1, M) ± (δφ)(x 1,..., x p ) = = χ i [φ(x 1,..., x i,..., x p ), f (x i )] i i<j χ i,j φ(x 1,..., x i,..., x j,..., x p, [x i, x j ]) (here χ i, χ i,j are the antisymmetric Koszul signs).

H 0 (L, M) p = {m M p [f (L), m] = 0} H 1 (L, M) p = {derivations h : L M of degree p} {inner derivations} Key lemma for formality. Let f : L M be a morphism of DGLA, with M formal. If f : H n (H (L), H (L)) 2 n H n (H (L), H (M)) 2 n is injective for every n 3, then L is formal. (e.g. when L a direct summand of M as an L-module.)

Definition A graded Lie algebra K is called intrinsically formal if every DGLA L such that H (L) K is formal. Corollary (Hinich, Tamarkin) A graded Lie algebra K such that H n (K, K) 2 n = 0 for every n 3 is intrinsically formal. Proof. take M = 0 in the Key lemma. The Euler class e H 1 (K, K) 0 of a graded Lie algebra K is the class of the Euler derivation e : K K, e(x) = deg(x)x. Theorem A graded Lie algebra K such that e = 0 H 1 (K, K) 0 is intrinsically formal.

Examples of intrinsically formal graded Lie algebras (with trivial Euler class). 1) Hom (V, V ) with V graded vector space. Since e = [u, ], u : V V, u(v) = deg(v)v. 2) Hom 0 (V, V ), Hom 0 (V, V ), V as above. 3) Der (A, A), with A graded commutative algebra. 4) Differential operators of a graded commutative algebra.

Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomology (general case). Given a DGLA L = (L, d, [, ]), as above we have the Chevalley-Eilenberg differential δ : Hom p ( i L, L) Hom (i+1 p L, L) together the natural differential induced by d: d : Hom p ( i L, L) Hom p+1 ( i L, L). Since d 2 = δ 2 = dδ + δd = 0, this gives a double complex (Hom ( L, L), d, δ).

The natural decresasing complete filtration F p = Hom ( p L, L) gives the Chevalley-Eilenberg spectral sequence (E(L, L) r p,q, d r ). It is easy to see that: 1) E(L, L) p,q 2 = H p (H (L), H (L)) q ; in particular it is defined the Euler class e E(L, L) 1,0 2. 2) the pages of (E(L, L) p,q r, d r ), for r > 0, and the Euler class are homotopy invariant of L. In particular, if L is formal, then the spectral sequence degenerate at E 2. It is worth to mention a recent result by R. Bandiera. Theorem (Bandiera, 2013) A DGLA is homotopy abelian if and only if its Chevalley-Eilenberg spectral sequence degenerates at E 1.

We are now ready to state the main theorem: Theorem For a differential graded Lie algebra L the following conditions are equivalent: 1. L is formal; 2. The Chevalley-Eilenberg spectral sequence degenerates at E 2 ; 3. d r (Euler class) = 0 for every r 2. The only non trivial implication is 3 1. Bandiera s theorem follows immediately but his proof is more easy and elegant.

Main steps of the proof: 1) extend the definition of C.E. spectral sequence and Euler class to any L -morphism f : L M of L -algebras. 2) using homotopy invariance and homotopy classification of L -algebras, reduce to consider only minimal L -algebras. 3) (inductive step) Let e E(V, V ) 1,0 2 be the Euler class of a minimal L -algebra V = (V, 0, q 2, 0,..., 0, q k+1,...), k 2, q n : V [1] n V [1]. Then d r (e) = 0 for every 2 r < k and d k (e) = 0 if and only if V is isomorphic to some (V, 0, q 2, 0,..., 0, ˆq k+2,...)

4) push step 3 to the limit k. Some similar results (in the framework of DG associative algebras) were proved by Kaledin (arxiv:math/0509699) and Lunts (arxiv:0712.0996), by using the same strategy. In these papers the Euler class is not considered and the inductive step 3) is based on the properties of a well defined cohomology class in the Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomology of the deformation to normal cone. The introduction of Euler class, not only gives simpler statement, but is also essential in the proof of the key lemma for formality.