Capacity Scarcity Condition Monday, September 3, 2018 Two primary factors led to the implementation of OP 4 event Significant generation outages and r

Similar documents
MISO September 15 Maximum Generation Event Overview. October 11, 2018

Operations Report. Tag B. Short, Director South Region Operations. Entergy Regional State Committee (ERSC) February 14, 2018

Wind Rules and Forecasting Project Update Market Issues Working Group 12/14/2007

California Independent System Operator (CAISO) Challenges and Solutions

Report on System-Level Estimation of Demand Response Program Impact

CAISO Participating Intermittent Resource Program for Wind Generation

Information Document Calculation of Pool Price and Transmission Constraint Rebalancing Costs During a Constraint Event ID # R

Systems Operations. PRAMOD JAIN, Ph.D. Consultant, USAID Power the Future. Astana, September, /6/2018

Energy Forecasting Customers: Analysing end users requirements Dec 3rd, 2013 Carlos Alberto Castaño, PhD Head of R&D

Total Market Demand Wed Jan 02 Thu Jan 03 Fri Jan 04 Sat Jan 05 Sun Jan 06 Mon Jan 07 Tue Jan 08

Recent US Wind Integration Experience

Battery Energy Storage

SMART GRID FORECASTING

Discussion of Load Forecast Uncertainty

Advance signals that can be used to foresee demand response days PJM SODRTF - March 9, 2018

A Unified Framework for Defining and Measuring Flexibility in Power System

The North American Electric Reliability Corporation hereby submits Informational Filing of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

2013 WEATHER NORMALIZATION SURVEY. Industry Practices

Some Observations on the Locational Marginal Prices and Loads

Price Correction Examples

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

peak half-hourly Tasmania

peak half-hourly New South Wales

Bringing Renewables to the Grid. John Dumas Director Wholesale Market Operations ERCOT

Economic Evaluation of Short- Term Wind Power Forecasts in ERCOT: Preliminary Results

LOAD POCKET MODELING. KEY WORDS Load Pocket Modeling, Load Forecasting

STATISTICAL LOAD MODELING

ISO Smart Grid Use Case

2018 Annual Review of Availability Assessment Hours

Integration of Behind-the-Meter PV Fleet Forecasts into Utility Grid System Operations

Course notes for EE394V Restructured Electricity Markets: Locational Marginal Pricing

APPENDIX 7.4 Capacity Value of Wind Resources

Prediction of Power System Balancing Requirements and Tail Events

Temporal Wind Variability and Uncertainty

Use of Normals in Load Forecasting at National Grid

Net Export Rule 1 : Deriving the generation value of storage device G(t)

UPDATE ELECTRICITY STATEMENT OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTRICITY MARKET

Reducing Contingency-based Windfarm Curtailments through use of Transmission Capacity Forecasting

MEDIUM TERM PASA PROCESS DESCRIPTION

Speedwell High Resolution WRF Forecasts. Application

Wind energy production backcasts based on a high-resolution reanalysis dataset

Power System Seminar Presentation Wind Forecasting and Dispatch 7 th July, Wind Power Forecasting tools and methodologies

International Workshop on Wind Energy Development Cairo, Egypt. ERCOT Wind Experience

WEATHER NORMALIZATION METHODS AND ISSUES. Stuart McMenamin Mark Quan David Simons

Chapter 6 Impact of Stochastic Renewable Energy Generation on Market Quantities 6.1 Introduction

Variables For Each Time Horizon

Fundamentals of Transmission Operations

A Model for a Zonal Operating Reserve Demand Curve

Report on Phase 2: System Performance Evaluation. Prepared for:

Expedited Filing Draft August 22, 2017

peak half-hourly South Australia

RTO Winter Resource Adequacy Assessment Status Report

SOUTH AUSTRALIAN WIND STUDY REPORT SOUTH AUSTRALIAN ADVISORY FUNCTIONS

Predicting the Electricity Demand Response via Data-driven Inverse Optimization

2013 FORECAST ACCURACY BENCHMARKING SURVEY AND ENERGY

Day Ahead Hourly Load and Price Forecast in ISO New England Market using ANN

Software Tools: Congestion Management

Perfect and Imperfect Competition in Electricity Markets

Inverse Optimization for the Recovery of Market Structure from Market Outcomes

Kenneth Shelton, Assistant Superintendent, Business Services Los Angeles County Office of Education 9300 Imperial Highway Downey, CA 90242

Short-Term Demand Forecasting Methodology for Scheduling and Dispatch

Optimization Basics for Electric Power Markets

The DC Optimal Power Flow

Bilevel Programming-Based Unit Commitment for Locational Marginal Price Computation

Belgian Wind Forecasting Phase 1

APPENDIX H WIND INTEGRATION STUDY

Firming Renewable Power with Demand Response: An End-to-end Aggregator Business Model

Cost of Inflow Forecast Uncertainty for Day Ahead Hydropower Production Scheduling

SHORT TERM LOAD FORECASTING

Administration by the CER of the Carbon Revenue Levy

Colorado PUC E-Filings System

Weather Risk Management

DIMACS, Rutgers U January 21, 2013 Michael Caramanis

LOADS, CUSTOMERS AND REVENUE

Benchmark of forecasting models

Modelling wind power in unit commitment models

The Dayton Power and Light Company Load Profiling Methodology Revised 7/1/2017

Better Weather Data Equals Better Results: The Proof is in EE and DR!

Analysis and the methods of forecasting of the intra-hour system imbalance

Probabilistic production cost simulation. EG2200 Lectures 12 14, autumn 2015 Mikael Amelin

Renewables and the Smart Grid. Trip Doggett President & CEO Electric Reliability Council of Texas

NASA Products to Enhance Energy Utility Load Forecasting

The document was not produced by the CAISO and therefore does not necessarily reflect its views or opinion.

2018 FORECAST ACCURACY BENCHMARKING SURVEY AND ENERGY TRENDS. Mark Quan

Wind Power Production Estimation through Short-Term Forecasting

International Studies about the Grid Integration of Wind Generation

CWV Review London Weather Station Move

Integrating Wind Resources Into the Transmission Grid

SYSTEM OPERATIONS. Dr. Frank A. Monforte

NSP Electric - Minnesota Annual Report Peak Demand and Annual Electric Consumption Forecast

2013 Summer Weather Outlook. Temperatures, Precipitation, Drought, Hurricanes and why we care

NOAA s Climate Normals. Pre-release Webcast presented by NOAA s National Climatic Data Center June 13, 2011

Winter Maintenance Report

A Progressive Hedging Approach to Multistage Stochastic Generation and Transmission Investment Planning

From Sales to Peak, Getting It Right Long-Term Demand Forecasting

Wind power and management of the electric system. EWEA Wind Power Forecasting 2015 Leuven, BELGIUM - 02/10/2015

Summary of Seasonal Normal Review Investigations CWV Review

Economic analysis of the N-1 reliable unit commitment and transmission switching problem using duality concepts

Transcription:

S E P T E M B E R 1 2, 2 0 1 8 September 3 OP-4 Event and Capacity Scarcity Condition Vamsi Chadalavada E X E C U T I V E V I C E P R E S I D E N T A N D C H I E F O P E R A T I N G O F F I C E R

Capacity Scarcity Condition Monday, September 3, 2018 Two primary factors led to the implementation of OP 4 event Significant generation outages and reductions totaling ~1650 MW occurred during the dispatch day Higher than forecasted temperatures and dew points with largest departures in the afternoon resulted in significant load forecast deviations 30-minute Reserve Constraint Penalty Factor violated for the following 5 minute intervals: 15:40 18:15 $1,000/MWh Reserve Constraint Penalty Factor 10-minute Reserve Constraint Penalty Factor violated for the following 5 minute intervals: 17:00 17:10 and 17:35 18:00 $1,500/MWh Reserve Constraint Penalty Factor System conditions required implementation of M/LCC 2 and OP 4 M/LCC 2: 15:15 21:00 OP 4, Actions 1,2: 15:30 20:00 OP 4, Actions 3-5: 16:00 21:00 2

Generation Outages and Reduction During the course of the operating day the system experienced ~1650 MW of significant generation outages and reductions The largest loss, totaling ~1050 MWs, occurred between 15:00 and 15:30 In addition, there were ~250 MWs of small reductions across many generators The total reductions were ~1900 MWs 3

Additional Commitments Prior to the significant outage of a resource between 15:00 and 15:30, the ISO committed ~600 MW of capacity resources Subsequent to the large outage, the ISO committed all remaining resources totaling ~45 MWs with short enough notification and start times that they could assist in meeting the evening peak 4

Load Forecast Deviations and Weather The ISO load forecast for the peak hour on 9/3 was 20,590 MWs Actual peak load served on 9/3 was 22,956 MWs* The ISO load forecast accuracy is primarily determined by the accuracy of weather forecasts On 9/3, the actual weather was hotter and more humid than forecast As the weather became hotter and more humid than forecast, the load started to deviate accordingly The following slides detail the temperature, dew point and Temperature Humidity Index (THI) deviations from the forecast for Boston and Hartford THI is a measure of the degree of discomfort experienced by an individual in warm weather *Reconstituted Load with Active DR was 23,174 MW; Not Revenue Quality Metered Data 5

System Load Actual versus Forecast 6

Boston Temperature Actual versus Forecast 7

Boston Dew Point Actual versus Forecast 8

Boston THI Actual versus Forecast 9

Hartford Temperature Actual versus Forecast 10

Hartford Dew Point Actual versus Forecast 11

Hartford THI Actual versus Forecast 12

Backcasting Actual Weather in Load Forecast Model would have resulted in a Load Forecast of ~22,000 MWs versus ~20,600 MWs 13

Top 10 Labor Day Loads and Actual Weather Year 2018 2014 2015 2011 2013 2007 1999 2008 2012 2005 HE01 12944 13639 12204 13415 13955 11271 11660 11621 11831 11706 HE02 12360 12958 11545 12684 13313 10765 11116 11021 11233 11076 HE03 12030 12555 11122 12213 12866 10426 10814 10637 10861 10675 HE04 11895 12357 10907 11931 12672 10278 10651 10430 10651 10499 HE05 11986 12325 10895 11903 12703 10314 10663 10440 10663 10462 HE06 12377 12579 11143 12171 13027 10597 10958 10665 10973 10673 HE07 12888 13033 11461 12495 13460 10867 11430 10923 11294 10934 HE08 13584 13783 12157 13336 14028 11753 12273 11730 11972 11730 HE09 14680 15089 13270 14699 15058 13080 13528 13033 13085 12975 HE10 15859 16570 14494 16155 16302 14332 14820 14235 14208 14211 HE11 17095 17890 15677 17352 17348 15245 15692 15064 14990 14986 HE12 18379 18898 16759 18259 18013 15837 16245 15485 15421 15369 HE13 19583 19552 17723 18871 18330 16221 16430 15685 15727 15537 HE14 20559 19928 18566 19101 18493 16463 16431 15761 15890 15518 HE15 21298 20101 19350 19070 18391 16678 16435 15851 16009 15501 HE16 21980 20386 19993 19007 18340 16956 16533 16024 16122 15585 HE17 22647 20787 20610 18978 18519 17307 16789 16352 16322 15855 HE18 23174 21083 20923 18964 18728 17542 16967 16581 16479 16076 HE19 22971 20818 20649 18784 18648 17429 16882 16430 16340 15984 HE20 22688 20771 20755 19131 18965 17918 17352 16727 16665 16454 HE21 22151 20557 20373 18907 18753 18229 17420 16905 16601 16521 HE22 20655 19100 18922 17668 17581 17116 16355 15749 15470 15354 HE23 18779 17231 17082 16008 15972 15389 14759 14101 13959 13636 HE24 17159 15604 15494 14433 14529 13917 13309 12628 12633 12224 Peak 23174 21083 20923 19131 18965 18229 17420 16905 16665 16521 Hartford High 94 89 90 82 78 86 79 84 78 77 Hartflord Low 71 70 61 67 70 57 71 53 57 55 % Sun 50 38 75 25 13 88 13 88 38 88 Avg Dewpoint 73 68 63 67 71 58 61 55 57 52 Boston High 94 84 93 86 79 87 84 84 71 69 Boston Low 73 72 66 69 69 60 67 64 60 59 % Sun 50 38 75 25 0 88 25 100 38 88 Avg Dewpoint 72 70 62 67 70 57 62 42 59 53 Estimated PV (peak hour) 415 126 175 no data no data no data no data no data no data no data 14

Operable Capacity Analysis during the OP 4 Event (HE 17) Capacity Supply Obligation (CSO) + 30,239 Capacity Additions > CSO + 582 Outages and Reductions 3,649 Generation Unavailable Due to Start Time 6,470 NYISO Purchases + 1,400 NBSO Purchases + 797 HQ Purchases + 1,158 Total Available Capacity = 24,057 New England Load 22,667 Operating Reserve Requirement 2,108 Net Capability Required 24,775 Capacity Margin Total Available - Required -718 15

Capacity Scarcity Condition Details September 3, 2018 Capacity Scarcity Condition Event Summary 5 Minute Intervals Constraint #1 Constraint #2 15:40-16:55 (16 intervals) System 30 Min RCPF - VIOLATED System 10 Min RCPF - Binding 17:00-17:10 (3 intervals) System 30 Min RCPF - VIOLATED System 10 Min RCPF - VIOLATED 17:15-17:30 (4 intervals) System 30 Min RCPF - VIOLATED System 10 Min RCPF - Binding 17:35-18:00 (6 intervals) System 30 Min RCPF - VIOLATED System 10 Min RCPF - VIOLATED 18:05-18:15 (3 intervals) System 30 Min RCPF - VIOLATED 16

Real Time Pricing Hub LMPs 17

Interchange Aggregate OP-4 18

Wind Output Forecast versus Actual 19

Solar Output Forecast versus Actual 20

Emergency Purchases (Preliminary) New Brunswick Power System Operator: 16:20-17:14; 150 MW 17:14-18:00; 229 MW New York Independent System Operator: 17:00-17:30; 251 MW 17:30-18:00; 100 MW 21

Fuel Diversity September 3, 2018 HE 15 22

Fuel Diversity September 3, 2018 HE 16 23

Fuel Diversity September 3, 2018 HE 17 24

Fuel Diversity September 3, 2018 HE 18 25

DA and RT Energy Market LMPs and NCPC Costs DA Hub Hourly LMPs ranged from $21.34/MWh to $60.85/MWh and averaged $38.65/MWh RT Hub LMPs ranged from $19.79/MWh to $2,677.05/MWh Average of all intervals: $262.61/MWh Daily NCPC totaled $1.9M 26

Preliminary Pay-for-Performance Summary Payment Classification FCM Resources Credits FCM Resources Charges Subtotal: FCM Resources Net Other Import Transactions Credits Other Assets Credits Subtotal: Other Total Credit/(Charge) $36.1M ($37.0M) ($0.9M) $7.3M $1.5M $8.8M $7.8M Preliminary balancing ratio averaged 0.72 1 Performance payment credits exceed the charges for this CSC by $7.8M. This imbalance is due to the FERC-mandated exclusion of Energy Efficiency resources from Performance Payments when the CSC occurs in off-peak hours. 2 Imbalance will be collected pro-rata from all CSO, including Energy Efficiency, to balance the settlement. 3 1. Average for the 32 five-minute intervals of CSC 2. FERC order dated May 30, 2014 at P 73. 3. Per Market Rule 1, Section 13.7.2.4 (i) 27

Peak Energy Rent (PER) Projections There were non-zero PER values for 4 hours during the day RT LMP exceeded strike price Labor Day PER will be included in the monthly PER adjustment for 8 months, October 2018 May 2019 PER is retired effective June 1, 2019 Estimate $7 Million per month PER adjustment, for a total of $56 Million Generators, Imports, Active Demand are subject to PER Self supply and Passive Demand excluded 28

29