EVALUATION OF NOISE LEVELS PRODUCED BY OP- ERATION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES OF A CON- TINUOUS MOVEMENT FUNICULAR

Similar documents
PART I : SECTION (1) GENERAL Government Notifications

Noise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Directive on the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise

SOUNDWALKS MAPPING AND INTERACTION WITH FA- CADE SOUND INSULATION

1 Wind Turbine Acoustics. Wind turbines generate sound by both mechanical and aerodynamic

Seasonal Variations of the Urban Heat Island Effect:

ACOUSTIC TESTS ON ORIGINAL CONCRETE AND INERT MIXTURE MATERIALS

Typical information required from the data collection can be grouped into four categories, enumerated as below.

Product Data. Brüel & Kjær B. Sound Intensity Calibrator Type 3541

ACOUSTICAL IMPACT OF TRAFFIC FLOWING EQUIPMENTS IN URBAN AREA

EUROPEAN pr ETS TELECOMMUNICATION June 1996 STANDARD

ATF 90G-4. Operating, Service and Maintenance Manual. Vehicle identification no: WFN4 RUL R

Traffic Noise Impact Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario

PRODUCT DATA. Sound Intensity Calibrator Type 3541-A. Uses and Features

Facing the winter challenges for railways in Europe - Winter & Railways Fact Sheet Root Causes Rolling Stock and Infrastructure UIC Survey Evaluation

Data Collection. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1

Traffic Modelling for Moving-Block Train Control System

Noise impact of innovative barriers dedicated to freight trains in urban areas

Comparing railway noise prediction results for passenger trains using various models

Possibilities of third parties in real estate management in the light of the INSPIRE Directive

The Spatial Structure of Cities: International Examples of the Interaction of Government, Topography and Markets

Report - Safety Investigation

Dubai Municipality LRT Noise and Vibration Impact Stage 2

Transportation Noise Assessment. 590 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario

GIS-BASED VISUALISATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1088 Maritime Way - Ottawa Prepared For

Transportation Noise Assessment. 560 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Innovative Sustainable Technology

TRANSPORTATION MODELING

Noise from Oil & Gas Facilities Acoustics 101 and Best Practices for Noise Control. Rob Stevens, HGC Engineering

Area Classification of Surrounding Parking Facility Based on Land Use Functionality

Transportation Noise Feasibility Assessment & 3930 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario

PREDICTING OVERHEATING RISK IN HOMES

Environmental & Socio-economic impacts of mass rapid transit using GIS

Uncertainties in Acoustics

SPACE-TIME ACCESSIBILITY MEASURES FOR EVALUATING MOBILITY-RELATED SOCIAL EXCLUSION OF THE ELDERLY

Method for Scaling the Indoor Pass-by Noise Testing on a Roller Test Bench in a Small Anechoic Chamber

Turbines and turbine sets Measurement of emitted airborne noise Engineering/survey method

Travel and Transportation

Sound Power Level. of the ENERCON E-82 E2. Operational Mode I. (Data Sheet)

Urban Planning Word Search Level 1

The 3V Approach. Transforming the Urban Space through Transit Oriented Development. Gerald Ollivier Transport Cluster Leader World Bank Hub Singapore

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE ON RAILPAD PROPERTIES, RAIL DECAY RATES AND NOISE RADIATION

MAY 5, Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.

The Spatial Information Corridor Contributes to UNISPACE+50. JIANG HUI Director of Internation Cooperation Department

Attenuation of rail vibration: Analysis of experimental data

Doppelmayr Worldwide. Johannes Fiedler, Doppelmayr Urban Solutions Urban Mobility India, Delhi, Nov. 25th 2015 Slide 1

Noise and Vibration of Electrical Machines

The prediction of passenger flow under transport disturbance using accumulated passenger data

2013 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY GUIDE

Stochastic prediction of train delays with dynamic Bayesian networks. Author(s): Kecman, Pavle; Corman, Francesco; Peterson, Anders; Joborn, Martin

Acoucité, Soundscape and Noise Observatory of Greater Lyon, FRANCE. Urban area of Nice Côte d Azur, FRANCE. Ecology department of Greater Lyon, FRANCE

Feasibility Noise Assessment. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario

Analysis of Disruption Causes and Effects in a Heavy Rail System

Special edition paper

A Remote Sensing and GIS approach to trace the Densification in Residential Areas

QIRT th International Conference on Quantitative InfraRed Thermography

GIS Geographical Information Systems. GIS Management

Applying Hazard Maps to Urban Planning

SAFETY GROUP 430 SAFETY WALK-THROUGH CHECKLIST

Estimating long-term noise levels from short-term noise measurements and a long term reference location

Subway Climatology at Newrail; Brian Agnew and Qian Zi

Reporting Category 2: Force, Motion, and Energy. A is a push or a pull in a specific direction.

Consists of several displays that provide you with useful information. Odometer, Trip meter. distribution monitor. Bluetooth HandsFreeLink

Mitigating risk through weather and climate intelligence to support business relevant decision making

Geohazard risk assessment and asset management along railway corridors

Appendix E FTA NOISE MODELING WORKSHEETS AND DETAILED METHODOLOGY

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment. 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario

Quality Assurance of Automated Measuring Systems: practical implementation of pren 14181:2001. Results of field experience at two Italian plants.

Site Suitability Analysis for Local Airport Using Geographic Information System

*24GSS3101* Science: Single Award. Unit 3 (Physics) Foundation Tier WEDNESDAY 25 MAY 2016, AFTERNOON [GSS31] *GSS31* TIME 1 hour.

ER2 Short-head Electric Chain Hoist

I. M. Schoeman North West University, South Africa. Abstract

Report of 1F Status about Great East Japan Earthquake

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Bishkek City Development Agency. Urban Planning Bishkek

City and SUMP of Ravenna

THE WEATHER CASE STUDIES

Chapter 6 Motion in Two Dimensions

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Test code for machine tools Part 5: Determination of the noise emission

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 78 (2015 ) th International Building Physics Conference, IBPC 2015

GETTING BRITAIN MOVING THIS WINTER Forecast, Gritting and Snow Clearing Services from Paxman Landscapes UK Ltd

Tourism in Peripheral Areas - A Case of Three Turkish Towns

Integrating Geographic Information System and. Building Information Model for Real Estate Valuation. Haicong Yu Ying Liu

Nosie mapping in the service of developments

Wind Turbine Generator System Acoustic Noise Test Report. Whisper H40 Wind Turbine

DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS FOR THE ELECTRO ACOUSTIC DIFFUSION SYSTEM IN SAN LORENZO CATHEDRAL IN PERUGIA

STRATEGIC NOISE MAP & ACTION PLANS FOR THE AG- GLOMERATION M6 PIRAEUS (2002/49/ΕC DIRECTIVE)

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1136 Martime Way - Ottawa Prepared For

LIST OF PUBLISHED STANDARDS

Element x in D is called the input or the independent variable of the function.

MOR CO Analysis of future residential and mobility costs for private households in Munich Region

AREP GAW. AQ Forecasting

CIV3703 Transport Engineering. Module 2 Transport Modelling

A new trial to estimate the noise propagation characteristics of a traffic noise system

Duration of online examination will be of 1 Hour 20 minutes (80 minutes).

ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE FOR ROMET ROTARY METER BODIES AND/OR MECHANICAL NON-CONVERTING AND CONVERTING MODULES

EXPERIMENTAL MODAL ANALYSIS OF A SCALED CAR BODY FOR METRO VEHICLES

Transcription:

EVALUATION OF NOISE LEVELS PRODUCED BY OP- ERATION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES OF A CON- TINUOUS MOVEMENT FUNICULAR Andrea Nicolini, Mirko Filipponi University of Perugia, via G. Duranti 67, 06125 Perugia, Italy e-mail: filipponi.unipg@ciriaf.it Continuous movement funicular is an innovative system for passenger transportation. This ropeway system is particularly suitable as a means of transportation for small and medium sized cities, for connections from public car parks to universities or commercial centers, or between centrally-located train or metro stations and peripheral suburbs. The advantages of this system are high availability, fully automatic operation and high carrying capacity. Disadvantages are high production costs and space requirements. Another disadvantage is also given by the closeness of such transport system with residential buildings, offices, hospitals or nursing home that could produce noise nuisance in sensitive noise receptors. In this paper an original method to evaluate the noise levels produced by funicular operation and maintenance activities is proposed. 1. Introduction In the present paper a method is proposed to predict noise levels produced on sensitive receptors by maintenance and control activities of a surface urban transport system. The noise level produced by maintenance and control activities has been evaluated considering the levels measured during a specific measurement campaign, with reference to frequency, recurrence of each activity and probability of an event occurring simultaneously with the others. All possible combinations of activities which could occur during the same reference time period have been identified and the probability has been evaluated for the corresponding level to occur considering the frequency of recurrence of each activities. Examined receptors for noise level inspection are located close to the ropeway because those are the receptors more exposed to the noise produced by operational and maintenance activities. However, such evaluations can be generalized and extended to all other receptors. 2. Measurement method Noise measurement have the purpose to characterize acoustic emissions from maintenance and control activities and to evaluate the contribution of each activity to the equivalent noise level. Thus, for each activity a specific measure has been performed whose duration is representative of the whole acoustic phenomenon. ICSV16, Kraków, Poland, 5-9 July 2009 1

A-weighted equivalent continuous sound level (L eqa ) has been performed at night reference time (22:00-6:00) because all maintenance and control activities are concentrated in that time period. Phonometers used for measurement are of class 1 as defined by standard IEC60651, IEC 60804, IEC 61672 equipped with free-field microphones. The measurement chain respects the requirements of standards CEI 29-10. Instruments and/or measurement chain before and after each measure cycle have been controlled with a calibrator of class l, according to standard IEC 942:1988. The measurement point has been selected in order to avoid other (external) sources which could affect the specific measure. Therefore the measurement distance has been suitably set up to 10 meters. Table 1 shows A-weighted equivalent continuous sound levels for each maintenance and control activity measured in the time period representative of the event without any other disturbing sources. Table 1: noise levels for each maintenance and control activities measured in the representative time period at a 10 m distance from source and without other disturbing sources Activities L eqa [db(a)] Maintenance cart movement 64,5 Replacement of roller 62,3 Greasing and inspection of synchronization groups 46,7 Station wheel inspection 52,2 Station wheel replacement 52,5 Station belt replacement 72,8 Closing and opening cycles of platform-level doors 50,8 Preparatory control of ropeway start-up 59,3 System inspection at runtime 62,1 Generator start-up without power supply of the ring 71,6 Generator start-up with power supply of the ring 52,0 Verification of setting of maximum torque protection and maximum winch velocity protection 55,9 Verification of braking efficiency at station entry 61,7 Verification of retrieval winch drive 52,0 Test of winch braking system - 3. Analysis method Table 2 shows maintenance and control activities selected for the verification of noise level at sensitive receptors and the corresponding occurrence frequency. The combination of such activities and the probability that each one can occur during the night time period have both been identified under the following hypotheses: - Preparatory control of ropeway and plant start-up have always been evaluated together; - maximum number of night time activities is 6; - inspection of synchronization groups and of station wheels are performed simultaneously for all the elements of the same station; - each activity frequency has been considered equal to the expected one in the maintenance booklet and in the control service schedule; - the frequency of different combined activities is obtained as composed probability of combination. 2

Under such hypotheses 110 different combinations of activities have been identified, each one characterized by a specific probability to occur during the night time reference period. Table 2: list of maintenance and control disturbing activities Code Activity Frequency A Maintenance cart movement Monthly B Replacement of roller 1/2 years C Greasing and inspection of synchronization groups 1/3 months D Station wheel inspection 1/3 months E Station wheel replacement 1/2 years F Station belt replacement 1/2 years G Closing and opening cycles of platform-level doors Daily H Preparatory control of ropeway start-up Daily I System inspection at runtime Daily L Generator start-up with power supply of the ring Monthly M Verification of setting of maximum torque protection and maximum winch velocity protection Monthly N Verification of braking efficiency at station entry Monthly O Verification of retrieval winch drive Monthly The noise level produced by each event has been obtained by the resulting measurements. The noise level produced by the combination of more activities has been calculated according to the following relation: n L j n L f 1 L = 10 + 10 Aeq, i 10 log n j T j 10 T r n j T j 10 (1) Tr j= 1 j= 1 where L j is the noise level produced by the j th activity, T j is the duration of the j th activity, n j is the frequency of the j th activity, T r is the night time reference period, L f is the background noise level in the night time reference period. Level L j has been calculated according to the relation: L j ( d ) = L j, 10 10 log j d0 (2) where L j,10 is the noise level produced by the j th activity measured at 10 m distance, d j is the distance of receptor from event, d 0 = 10 m. 4. Results Evaluation of disturb produced by maintenance and control activities during the night time reference period has been performed at the first floor level which are closest to the ropeway. For each receptor, the noise level produced by each of the 110 combinations of activities has been calculated with the Eq. (1), subsequently, according to the probability of each combination, the statistical distribution of all possible noise levels has been evaluated. Table 3 shows the 110 combinations with the corresponding probability and the night time noise level. Charts in figures 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 show statistical distribution of levels as foreseen for 4 receptors (R1, R2, R3 and R4), which are the most exposed to the noise emissions of the line. 3

Table 3: combinations of maintenance and control activities with corresponding probability and noise level 4 Combination of activities Probability (%) Noise level (dba) R1 R2 R3 R4 A 0,533333 51,45 50,84 50,29 49,85 B 0,022222 47,45 47,21 47,02 46,87 C 0,177778 46,00 46,00 46,00 46,00 D 0,177778 46,00 46,18 46,68 46,00 E 0,022222 46,00 46,01 46,03 46,00 F 0,022222 48,43 50,27 51,35 49,32 G 0,000000 46,00 46,00 46,02 46,00 H 0,000000 48,34 47,97 47,66 47,42 I 0,000000 47,68 47,41 47,19 47,02 L 0,533333 46,50 46,35 46,23 46,14 M 0,533333 46,37 46,29 46,23 46,18 N 0,533333 47,00 46,82 46,69 46,58 O 0,533333 46,45 46,31 46,20 46,12 A + B 0,000119 51,92 51,27 50,70 50,23 G + H + I 96,000000 49,40 48,92 48,52 48,18 A + G + H + I 0,380000 52,72 52,02 51,41 50,88 A + L 0,002844 51,60 50,95 50,38 49,91 A + M 0,002844 51,56 50,93 50,38 49,93 A + N 0,002844 51,76 51,12 50,56 50,10 A + O 0,002844 51,59 50,94 50,37 49,90 B + G + H + I 0,021333 50,12 49,58 49,12 48,73 B + L 0,000119 47,82 47,48 47,20 46,99 B + M 0,000119 47,72 47,43 47,20 47,02 B + N 0,000119 48,19 47,85 47,57 47,36 B + O 0,000119 47,78 47,45 47,18 46,97 C + G + H + I 0,170667 49,40 48,92 48,52 48,18 C + L 0,000948 46,50 46,35 46,23 46,14 C + M 0,000948 46,37 46,29 46,23 46,18 C + N 0,000948 47,00 46,82 46,69 46,58 C + O 0,000948 46,45 46,31 46,20 46,12 D + G + H + I 0,170667 49,40 49,01 48,91 48,18 D + L 0,000948 46,50 46,52 46,88 46,14 D + M 0,000948 46,37 46,46 46,87 46,18 D + N 0,000948 47,00 46,97 47,27 46,58 D + O 0,000948 46,45 46,48 46,85 46,12 E + G + H + I 0,021333 49,40 48,92 48,53 48,18 E + L 0,000119 46,50 46,36 46,26 46,14 E + M 0,000119 46,37 46,30 46,26 46,18 E + N 0,000119 47,00 46,83 46,71 46,58 E + O 0,000119 46,45 46,32 46,23 46,12 F + G + H + I 0,021333 50,68 51,60 52,25 50,47 F + L 0,000119 48,73 50,40 51,42 49,39 F + M 0,000119 48,64 50,38 51,42 49,41 F + N 0,000119 49,03 50,60 51,56 49,60 F + O 0,000119 48,69 50,39 51,41 49,38 A + B + G + H + I 0,000114 53,07 52,36 51,72 51,19 A + B + L 0,000001 52,05 51,38 50,78 50,28 A + B + M 0,000001 52,01 51,36 50,78 50,30 A + B + N 0,000001 52,20 51,53 50,94 50,46 A + B + O 0,000001 52,04 51,37 50,77 50,28 A + G + H + I + L 0,002027 52,83 52,11 51,47 50,93 A + G + H + I + M 0,002027 52,80 52,10 51,47 50,95 A + G + H + I + N 0,002027 52,95 52,24 51,61 51,08 A + G + H + I + O 0,002027 52,82 52,10 51,46 50,92

B + G + H + I + L 0,000114 50,32 49,73 49,23 48,80 B + G + H + I + M 0,000114 50,27 49,71 49,23 48,83 B + G + H + I + N 0,000114 50,53 49,96 49,46 49,05 B + G + H + I + O 0,000114 50,30 49,72 49,22 48,80 C + G + H + I + L 0,000910 49,64 49,10 48,65 48,26 C + G + H + I + M 0,000910 49,57 49,07 48,65 48,29 C + G + H + I + N 0,000910 49,88 49,36 48,91 48,54 C + G + H + I + O 0,000910 49,61 49,08 48,63 48,25 D + G + H + I + L 0,000910 49,64 49,19 49,03 48,26 D + G + H + I + M 0,000910 49,57 49,15 49,03 48,29 D + G + H + I + N 0,000910 49,88 49,44 49,28 48,54 D + G + H + I + O 0,000910 49,61 49,17 49,02 48,25 E + G + H + I + L 0,000114 49,64 49,10 48,66 48,26 E + G + H + I + M 0,000114 49,57 49,07 48,66 48,29 E + G + H + I + N 0,000114 49,88 49,36 48,93 48,54 E + G + H + I + O 0,000114 49,61 49,08 48,65 48,25 F + G + H + I + L 0,000114 50,86 51,70 52,30 50,52 F + G + H + I + M 0,000114 50,81 51,68 52,30 50,54 F + G + H + I + N 0,000114 51,04 51,84 52,42 50,69 F + G + H + I + O 0,000114 50,84 51,69 52,30 50,52 A + G + H + I + L + M 0,000011 52,91 52,18 51,54 50,99 A + G + H + I + L + N 0,000011 53,06 52,33 51,68 51,13 A + G + H + I + L + O 0,000011 52,93 52,19 51,53 50,97 A + G + H + I + M + N 0,000011 53,03 52,31 51,68 51,14 A + G + H + I + M + O 0,000011 52,90 52,17 51,53 50,98 A + G + H + I + N + O 0,000011 53,04 52,32 51,67 51,12 B + G + H + I + L + M 0,000001 50,46 49,86 49,34 48,90 B + G + H + I + L + N 0,000001 50,72 50,10 49,57 49,12 B + G + H + I + L + O 0,000001 50,50 49,87 49,33 48,87 B + G + H + I + M + N 0,000001 50,67 50,08 49,57 49,14 B + G + H + I + M + O 0,000001 50,44 49,84 49,33 48,89 B + G + H + I + N + O 0,000001 50,70 50,09 49,56 49,11 C + G + H + I + L + M 0,000005 49,80 49,24 48,77 48,37 C + G + H + I + L + N 0,000005 50,10 49,52 49,03 48,62 C + G + H + I + L + O 0,000005 49,84 49,25 48,76 48,34 C + G + H + I + M + N 0,000005 50,04 49,49 49,03 48,65 C + G + H + I + M + O 0,000005 49,77 49,22 48,76 48,36 C + G + H + I + N + O 0,000005 50,07 49,50 49,02 48,61 D + G + H + I + L + M 0,000005 49,80 49,33 49,14 48,37 D + G + H + I + L + N 0,000005 50,10 49,60 49,38 48,62 D + G + H + I + L + O 0,000005 49,84 49,34 49,13 48,34 D + G + H + I + M + N 0,000005 50,04 49,57 49,38 48,65 D + G + H + I + M + O 0,000005 49,77 49,31 49,13 48,36 D + G + H + I + N + O 0,000005 50,07 49,58 49,37 48,61 E + G + H + I + L + M 0,000001 49,80 49,25 48,79 48,37 E + G + H + I + L + N 0,000001 50,10 49,53 49,05 48,62 E + G + H + I + L + O 0,000001 49,84 49,26 48,77 48,34 E + G + H + I + M + N 0,000001 50,04 49,50 49,05 48,65 E + G + H + I + M + O 0,000001 49,77 49,23 48,77 48,36 E + G + H + I + N + O 0,000001 50,07 49,51 49,03 48,61 F + G + H + I + L + M 0,000001 50,98 51,78 52,36 50,59 F + G + H + I + L + N 0,000001 51,21 51,94 52,47 50,74 F + G + H + I + L + O 0,000001 51,01 51,78 52,35 50,57 F + G + H + I + M + N 0,000001 51,16 51,92 52,47 50,75 F + G + H + I + M + O 0,000001 50,96 51,77 52,35 50,58 F + G + H + I + N + O 0,000001 51,19 51,93 52,47 50,73 5

Figure 1. Statistical distribution of noise levels at the receptor R1. Figure 2. Statistical distribution of noise levels at the receptor R2. 6

Figure 3. Statistical distribution of noise levels at the receptor R3. Figure 4. Statistical distribution of noise levels at the receptor R4. 7

Analysis of results shows that for each receptor there is a level with a high probability corresponding to the combination (preparatory controls of ropeway start-up and system inspection at runtime) which occurs at almost daily frequency. Such combination determines in the four receptors R1, R2, R3 and R4 respectively 49,5 dba, 49,0 dba, 48,5 dba and 48,0 dba. 5. Conclusions In the present paper a new method is described to evaluate levels of disturb produced on receptors more exposed to maintenance, inspection and control (MPVC) activities of a light railway surface line. Overcoming the uncertainty of all maintenance and control activities combinations, the presented methodology allows to identify the statistical distribution of noise levels on sensitive receptors. Proposed method can be applied to other contexts where maintenance activities with different duration, frequency and acoustic emission level randomly combine within a reference time period. At present time the model is under experimental validation phase with a measurement campaign of the noise produced by the infrastructure at the sensitive receptors. 8