Galactic cosmic nuclei and leptons with USINE

Similar documents
PoS(ICRC2015)540. Uncertainties on propagation parameters: impact on the interpretation of the positron fraction

The USINE propagation code and recent results from an MCMC analysis

Cosmic rays and the diffuse gamma-ray emission

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 29 Jan 2015

Galactic Cosmic Ray Propagation in the AMS 02 Era

Topics. 1. Towards a unified picture of CRs production and propagation: 2. AMS-02 good candidates for Dark Matter space search

Dark matter and LHC: complementarities and limitations

Monthly Proton Flux. Solar modulation with AMS. Veronica Bindi, AMS Collaboration

Cosmic Ray Transport (in the Galaxy) Luke Drury. Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies Institiúid Ard-Léinn Bhaile Átha Cliath

Astrophysical issues in the cosmic ray e spectra: Have we seen dark matter annihilation?

The High-Energy Interstellar Medium

a cosmic- ray propagation and gamma-ray code

99 Years from Discovery : What is our current picture on Cosmic Rays? #6 How cosmic rays travel to Earth? Presented by Nahee Park

Production of Secondary Cosmic Rays in Supernova Remnants

Galactic cosmic rays phenomenology: nuclei, antimatter, dark matter

Dark matter annihilations and decays after the AMS-02 positron measurements

Cosmic rays in the local interstellar medium

Troy A. Porter Stanford University

Current and Future balloon and space experiments L. Derome (LPSC Grenoble) Tango, May 4-6th, 2009

Dark Matter Searches with AMS-02. AMS: Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer

² The universe observed ² Relativistic world models ² Reconstructing the thermal history ² Big bang nucleosynthesis ² Dark matter: astrophysical

Cosmic-ray propagation in the light of the Myriad model

High and low energy puzzles in the AMS-02 positron fraction results

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 17 Nov 2008

Cosmic ray electrons from here and there (the Galactic scale)

Cosmic Ray Physics with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer

A new look at the cosmic ray positron fraction

Gamma ray and antiparticles (e + and p) as tools to study the propagation of cosmic rays in the Galaxy

Evidence of Stochastic Acceleration of Secondary. Antiprotons by Supernova Remnants! Ilias Cholis, 08/09/2017

Baryonic Antimatter in Cosmic Rays

Properties of Elementary Particle Fluxes in Cosmic Rays. TeVPA Aug. 7, Yuan-Hann Chang National Central University, Taiwan

New results from the AMS experiment on the International Space Station. Henning Gast RWTH Aachen

W.R. Webber. New Mexico State University, Astronomy Department, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA

The PAMELA Satellite Experiment: An Observatory in Space for Particles, Antiparticles and Nuclei in the Cosmic Rays

ANTIMATTER FROM PRIMORDIAL BLACK HOLES

Propagation in the Galaxy 2: electrons, positrons, antiprotons

Effect of the Regular Galactic Magnetic Field on the Propagation of Galactic Cosmic Rays in the Galaxy

Spectra of Cosmic Rays

Lecture 14 Cosmic Rays

AMS-02 Antiprotons Reloaded

Subir Sarkar

Strict constrains on cosmic ray propagation and abundances. Aaron Vincent IPPP Durham

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 28 Aug 2015

Questions 1pc = 3 ly = km

AMS-02 Antiprotons Reloaded

GeV-TeV Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs)

Seeing the moon shadow in CRs

A Galaxy in VHE Gamma-rays: Observations of the Galactic Plane with the H.E.S.S. array

Interstellar gamma rays. New insights from Fermi. Andy Strong. on behalf of Fermi-LAT collaboration. COSPAR Scientific Assembly, Bremen, July 2010

Searching for signatures of nearby sources of Cosmic rays in their local chemical composition

Precision measurements of nuclear CR energy spectra and composition with the AMS-02 experiment

Astro2020 Science White Paper Prospects for the detection of synchrotron halos around middle-age pulsars

Cosmic Ray Excess From Multi-Component Dark Matter

Searching for Dark Matter in the Galactic Center with Fermi LAT: Challenges

1. New Mexico State University, Department of Astronomy, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA

Evaluation of Galactic Cosmic Rays Models Using AMS2 Data. Francis F. Badavi 1. Christopher J. Mertens 2 Tony C. Slaba 2

The Large Area Telescope on-board of the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Mission

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 7 Aug 2018

W.R. Webber. New Mexico State University, Astronomy Department, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA

PoS(ICRC2017)740. Observing the Galactic Plane with the Cherenkov Telescope Array. CTA consortium represented by Roberta Zanin and Jamie Holder

PAMELA satellite: fragmentation in the instrument

Gamma-ray and neutrino diffuse emissions of the Galaxy above the TeV

Spectral Intensities of Antiprotons and the Lifetime Of Cosmic Rays

> News < AMS-02 will be launched onboard the Shuttle Endeavour On May 2nd 2:33 P.M. from NASA Kennedy space center!

Astrophysical issues in indirect DM detection

Antiparticle detection in space for dark matter search: the PAMELA experiment.

TeV cosmic-ray proton and helium spectra in the myriad model

Study of Solar Gamma Rays basing on Geant4 code

Results from the PAMELA Space Experiment

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 114, A02103, doi: /2008ja013689, 2009

LATE DECAYING TWO-COMPONENT DARK MATTER (LD2DM) CAN EXPLAIN THE AMS-02 POSITRON EXCESS

Supernova Remnants and Cosmic. Rays

Cosmic-Ray Isotopic Identification with the Geomagnetic Field for Space Experiments.

Cosmic Ray panorama. Pamela.roma2.infn.it PAMELA (2012) Experimental challenges : e + /p ~ 10-3 e + /e - ~ 10-1

Activités au LAPTh. G. Bélanger

An Auger Observatory View of Centaurus A

Enhancement of Antimatter Signals from Dark Matter Annihilation

Using the Fermi-LAT to Search for Indirect Signals from Dark Matter Annihilation

The Cosmic Ray Boron/Carbon Ratio Measured at Voyager and at AMS-2 from 10 MeV/nuc up to ~1 TeV/nuc and a Comparison With Propagation Calculations

Bright gamma-ray sources observed by DArk Matter Particle Explorer

Constraining the Diffusion Coefficient with HAWC TeV Gamma-Ray Observations of Two Nearby Pulsar Wind Nebulae

Gamma-ray and neutrino diffuse emissions of the Galaxy above the TeV

Constraining Dark Matter annihilation with the Fermi-LAT isotropic gamma-ray background

Low-Energy Cosmic Rays

Energy Spectrum of all Electrons and Positron Fraction

The Inner Region of the Milky Way Galaxy in High Energy Gamma Rays

Dark Matter searches with astrophysics

Fermi measurements of diffuse gamma-ray emission: results at the first-year milestone

Discovery of TeV Gamma-ray Emission Towards Supernova Remnant SNR G Last Updated Tuesday, 30 July :01

Primary Cosmic Rays : what are we learning from AMS

Cosmic Rays & Magnetic Fields

Justin Vandenbroucke (KIPAC, Stanford / SLAC) for the Fermi LAT collaboration

Testing a DM explanation of the positron excess with the Inverse Compton scattering

Galactic radio loops. Philipp Mertsch with Subir Sarkar. The Radio Synchrotron Background Workshop, University of Richmond 21 July 2017

PoS(ICRC2017)297. Modeling of the Earth atmosphere ionization by a galactic cosmic ray protons with RUSCOSMICS. Speaker. Maurchev E.A. Balabin Yu.V.

New Calculation of Cosmic-Ray Antiproton and Positron Flux

Anisotropic diffusion of high-energy cosmic-ray electrons in the Galaxy

Galactic cosmic rays propagation

The origin of the light elements in the early Universe

Antimatter from Supernova Remnants

Transcription:

Galactic cosmic nuclei and leptons with USINE a, David Maurin b a LPTHE, CNRS & UPMC, 4 Place Jussieu, F-75252 Paris France b LPSC, UGA & CNRS/IN2P3, 53 avenue des Martyrs, 38026 Grenoble France E-mail: boudaud@lpthe.jussieu.fr USINE is a C++ toolbox for the propagation of Galactic cosmic rays (GCRs). Starting from CR properties (list of nuclei and their properties, interaction cross-sections) and Galactic ingredients (source spectra, interstellar medium, radiation field, etc.), several semi-analytical propagation models are available (1D and 2D). Non-public versions of USINE were used during the last decade to determine the transport parameters, to study radioactive nuclei, and to test a possible dark matter contribution in antinuclei. This poster illustrates USINE usefulness both as a pedagogic and as a research tool. While preparing for an overdue public release, we are also implementing the recently developed pinching method to have electrons and positrons in USINE. 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference ICRC2017 10 20 July, 2017 Bexco, Busan, Korea Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). http://pos.sissa.it/

1. Introduction The last 15 years have seen many surprises and developments on the cosmic-ray side thanks to the high statistics data provided by the PAMELA, FERMI, and AMS-02 collaborations. New features (e.g., breaks) and/or the high accuracy of these data are challenging the standard propagation models currently used in the CR community. CRs are supposed to be accelerated by supernova remnants (and also by pulsar wind nebulae for electrons/positrons). After being released by these astrophysical systems, they are confined in the Galaxy by the magnetic field structure, diffusing on the magnetic field and interacting with the interstellar medium (ISM). A full and thorough treatment invokes magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) calculations to encompass all the microphysics at play. However, this approach requires a precise description of the Galaxy not often accessible as well as an important CPU time to solve numerically the non-linear equations of MHD. Since the Larmor radius of CRs deflected by the turbulent magnetic field is much smaller than the Galaxy size, CR propagation can be assimilated to a random walk, and can be described by a diffusion process from the rigidity of a few GV to tens of TV. In general, numerical algorithms are required to solve the full phenomenological transport equation (e.g., GALPROP [12], DRAGON [4], or PICARD [7]), allowing to deal with any geometry and dependence for the transport parameters (diffusion, convection, reacceleration). An alternative approach is to restrict the geometry and dependences to cases for which the transport equation can be solved semi-analytically [8]. This method is faster, which is an advantage to run extensive scans over the transport parameter space. In the following, we briefly present the semi-analytical models implemented in USINE and the code structure. For illustration purpose, we show some example plots. We finally discuss the new implementation of the pinching method allowing to deal with the propagation of cosmic ray electrons and positrons. 2. The two-zone model and the semi-analytical method The Galaxy geometry is described by the two-zone models. The first zone, within which the ISM is homogeneously distributed, represents the Galactic disc of half-height h. The secondzone is the magnetic halo (MH) of half-height L typically lying between a few kpc and few tens of kpc. The scattering of cosmic CRs on the Galactic magnetic field is modelled by a diffusion in space with the diffusion coefficient K(R, x) where R = p/q is the rigidity of the cosmic ray related to its momentum p and its charge q. Since the diffusion centres move with the Alfvén waves velocity V a, the second-order Fermi mechanism applies and CRs could undergo a diffusive reacceleration. This process can be modelled by a diffusion in energy space with coefficient D(E, x) Va 2 /K(R, x). Moreover, CRs can interact with the ISM, leading to energy losses (including ionisation and Coulomb interaction) and their destruction at rates b and Γ, respectively, and radioactive species decay at rate τdec 1. Finally, CRs undergo the effect of the Galactic wind V c (z) produced by supernova explosions in the Galactic disc. In the thin disc approximation, the density of CRs per unit of space and energy ψ(e,t, x) dn/d 3 xde obeys the generic transport equation t ψ + [ V c ψ K ] ψ + E [bψ 2hδ(z)D E ψ] = Q(E,t, x) S(E,t, x), (2.1) 2

where Q represents the injection rate of CRs in the Galaxy, whether they are primary or secondary species, whereas the sink term S = (Γ + τdec 1 )ψ. For more details on the method to solve 2.1, we refer the reader to [8, 11, 3]. The cosmic rays measured on the top of the Earth atmosphere have to penetrate the heliosphere where they interact with the Solar wind and the Solar magnetic field. These mechanisms can be described by a local phenomenological diffusion equation. A more straightforward approach is to use the forced-field approximation [5]. 3. USINE Figure 1: Galaxy geometry in the two-zone model. The USINE code calculates the galactic flux of any CR species, solving the transport equation (2.1) in a 1D and 2D two-zone model. All input ingredients are controlled by an (USINEformatted) ASCII parameter file, including the list of propagated CRs, their parents, the ISM description, the formula for the transport and source parameters, the files for the interaction crosssections and CR data to use (USINE relies on the CRDB 1 USINE export format [10]), Solar modulation model and its parameters, etc. The first version of USINE was written in 1999 in C. The second version was written between 2003 and 2005 in C++ and interfaced with ROOT 2. The current version (V3) is based on a complete rewriting of V2 in order to provide a more generic and flexible code, whose structure is illustrated in Fig.2: thanks to the many properties of C++ (abstraction, inheritance, overloading, etc.), the above classes are designed to enable generic spatial and energy dependences, using for instance pre-defined interpreted keywords for energy variables (R, Etot, beta, Ekn) to be used in formulae along with any free parameters (using the Function Parser library 3 ). Outputs of a typical USINE run are files and plots (using the CERN ROOT interface) directly comparing the calculation to CR data. As a model calculation is very fast, a text-user interface is provided for pedagogical purposes, where the user can play with the parameters, decide to compare visually the use of different cross-section files, etc. In the fit mode, USINE is interfaced with 1 https://lpsc.in2p3.fr/crdb 2 https://root.cern.ch 3 http://warp.povusers.org/fuctionparser 3

Figure 2: C++ classes in USINE sorted according to the propagation ingredients. MINUIT, and almost any parameters (transport, modulation level, source term) can be left free, simply by writing it in the USINE parameter file. The most recent developments of the code were dedicated to make it as user-friendly as possible. For instance, the code is now fully documented, it has extensive test functions to ensure the stability of the code as development goes, and it has been migrated on a git server in preparation of the forthcoming public release. A tutorial is also in preparation in order to walk users through the parameter files and USINE many run options. 4. Cosmic-ray nuclei USINE provides a very useful tool to learn about the nature of CR nuclei and the physics behind their propagation. As an example, Fig. 3 shows the proportion of primaries (coming directly from the acceleration sites), secondaries (in one or several steps) and decay-fed (from radioactive parents) with respect to the measured flux at the Earth for each isotope (top panel) as well as each element (bottom panel), for 1, 10 and 100 GeV/n. USINE enables also for a given element to trace its parents (in one or several steps) and then to determine the relative part of its parents to the measured flux. This ranking is very useful since, as pointed out in [9], one of the main uncertainties for CR physics is the poor knowledge of nuclear spallation cross-sections. Ratios of secondary to primary species (like B/C) measured at the earth are crucial to understand the CR propagation and to determine the propagation parameters. Nevertheless, the normalisation of the diffusion coefficient K 0 is degenerated with the size of the magnetic halo L. This degeneracy can be lifted with the measurement of radioactive species like 10 Be. As a second ex- 4

Figure 3: Fractional contribution of primaries (black), production in 1 (red), 2 (blue), or 3 steps (green), and decay-fed contributions (orange) for 1, 10 and 100 GeV/n. ample, the left panel of Fig. 4 illustrates the fractions of the parent and daughter nuclei resulting from the decay reaction 10 Be 10 B during the propagation, with respect to the case of no-decay. Figure 4: Relative impact of the radioactive decay 10 Be 10 B for the fluxes of 10 Be and 10 B. The last example illustrates the fact that USINE can also be used to provide very relevant research results. Indeed, recently, the AMS-02 collaboration reported a break δ 0.14 at rigidity R b 300 GV in the measured spectra of CR proton and helium [1]. Taking advantage of the mini- 5

mization module and the flexibility of the parameter settings (allowing for fully free or alternatively nuisance parameters), the hypothesis of a break in the diffusion coefficient was tested: K(R) = K 0 β (R/GV) δ {1 + (R/R b ) δ/s} s, (4.1) where s 0.04 is a smoothing parameter. The full analysis is reported in [6], and also presented in this conference. The analysis favours a break in the B/C ratio, as illustrated in Fig. 5 where the data points are the AMS-02 B/C data [2]. B/C [No Unit] Residual [%] 0.2 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 20 0 XS: GAL AMS-02 (2016) 20 10 100 1000 Rigidity R [GV] w/o break w/ break Figure 5: The predicted B/C computed with the standard diffusion coefficient (red) and with a break in the diffusion coefficient (blue) to be compared with the AMS-02 data. 5. Cosmic ray electrons and positrons CR electrons and positrons undergo energy losses in the whole magnetic halo through synchrotron emission and inverse Compton scattering on the interstellar radiation field. Hence, in principle, we cannot use the same semi-analytic method as for nuclei. However, the pinching method developed in [3] allows to overcome this difficulty. As multi-species analyses in a common framework are crucial to address the difficult question of possible dark matter signals in CR data, this method is currently being added to USINE. Indeed, electrons and positrons do not have the same propagation story as for nuclei, so that they provide us with precious complementary informations, as pointed out in [3]. Fig. 6 illustrates the capability for the positron channel to reduce the parameter space of propagation. Note that the implementation for the propagation of electrons and positrons should be achieved by the end of 2018. 6

E 3 Φ II e +[s 1 cm 2 sr 1 GeV 2 ] 10 3 10 4 Example of model Z s < 3 Examples of model Z s > 3 Region Z s < 3 Excluded region AMS02 data 1 10 100 Positron Energy E [GeV] Figure 6: Complementarity between the B/C and the positron observables. The yellow band represents the predicted flux of positrons from the propagation parameters consistent with the B/C data [8]. The red band represents the region excluded at 99.7% C.L. by the AMS-02 positron data [3]. Conclusion USINE is a C++/ROOT code dedicated to the propagation of GCR nuclei and anti-nuclei as well as electrons and positrons. Although USINE was developed for two zones (thin disc and thick halo) 1D and 2D models, it could be easily extended to more complex modelling. A lot of efforts were dedicated towards flexibility (the USINE classes for the propagation ingredients are designed to support 3D and time dependence), simplicity of the inputs (ASCII files for cross-sections, CR data, and initialisation and description of the free parameters of the study), and comparisons to data (import from CRDB, plots, and additional free parameters easily handled in the minimisation). In the context of AMS-02 data and the many young researchers entering the field, USINE should prove a fast and useful tool to learn or better understand the richness of the physics of GCRs. Aknowledgments MB acknowledges support from the European Research Council (ERC) under the EU Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC Starting Grant (agreement n. 278234 NewDark project led by M. Cirelli). DM acknowledges support from the Investissements d avenir, Labex ENIGMASS, and by the French ANR, Project DMAstro-LHC, ANR-12-BS05-0006. References [1] Aguilar, M. et al., PRL 114, 171103 (2015) and PRL 115, 211101 (2015) [2] Aguilar, M. et al., PRL 117, 231102 (2016) 7

[3] Boudaud, M., Bueno, E. F., Caroff, S. et al., arxiv:1612.03924 (2016) [4] Di Bernardo, G., Evoli, C., Gaggero, D. et al., AP 2010, 08, 006 (2010) [5] Fisk, L. A., JGR 76, 221 (1971) [6] Genolini Y., Serpico P.D., Boudaud M. et al., arxiv:1706.09812 (2017) [7] Kissman, R., AP 2014, 02, 002 (2014) [8] Maurin, D., Donato, F., Taillet, R., and Salati, P., ApJ 555, 585 (2001) [9] Maurin, D., Putze, A., and Derome, L., A&A 516, 67 (2010) [10] Maurin, D., Melot, F., and Taillet, R., A&A 569, A32 (2014) [11] Putze, A., Derome, L., and Maurin, D., A&A 516, 66 (2010) [12] Strong, A.W. and Moskalenko, I.V., ApJ 509, 212 (1998) 8