Experimental design (KKR031, KBT120) Tuesday 11/ :30-13:30 V

Similar documents
Assignment 9 Answer Keys

Answer Keys to Homework#10

Stat664 Homework #3 due April 21 Turn in problems marked with

20g g g Analyze the residuals from this experiment and comment on the model adequacy.

ESTIMATION METHODS FOR MISSING DATA IN UN-REPLICATED 2 FACTORIAL AND 2 FRACTIONAL FACTORIAL DESIGNS

Two-Level Fractional Factorial Design

3.4. A computer ANOVA output is shown below. Fill in the blanks. You may give bounds on the P-value.

STAT451/551 Homework#11 Due: April 22, 2014

2.830J / 6.780J / ESD.63J Control of Manufacturing Processes (SMA 6303) Spring 2008

CSCI 688 Homework 6. Megan Rose Bryant Department of Mathematics William and Mary

Plasma Etch Tool Gap Distance DOE Final Report

Design of Experiments SUTD - 21/4/2015 1

2.830 Homework #6. April 2, 2009

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTS Third Edition

4. The 2 k Factorial Designs (Ch.6. Two-Level Factorial Designs)

Fractional Factorial Designs

23. Fractional factorials - introduction

Chapter 11: Factorial Designs

Solution to Final Exam

10.0 REPLICATED FULL FACTORIAL DESIGN

4. Design of Experiments (DOE) (The 2 k Factorial Designs)

19. Blocking & confounding

Design of Experiments SUTD 06/04/2016 1

Reference: Chapter 6 of Montgomery(8e) Maghsoodloo

Chapter 6 The 2 k Factorial Design Solutions

Suppose we needed four batches of formaldehyde, and coulddoonly4runsperbatch. Thisisthena2 4 factorial in 2 2 blocks.

Session 3 Fractional Factorial Designs 4

How To: Analyze a Split-Plot Design Using STATGRAPHICS Centurion

Multiplying Rational Numbers Examples

Factorial designs (Chapter 5 in the book)

Contents. TAMS38 - Lecture 8 2 k p fractional factorial design. Lecturer: Zhenxia Liu. Example 0 - continued 4. Example 0 - Glazing ceramic 3

2 k, 2 k r and 2 k-p Factorial Designs

Strategy of Experimentation II

Question Possible Points Score Total 100

Institutionen för matematik och matematisk statistik Umeå universitet November 7, Inlämningsuppgift 3. Mariam Shirdel

2.830J / 6.780J / ESD.63J Control of Manufacturing Processes (SMA 6303) Spring 2008

Design of Experiments

Response Surface Methodology

Math 3330: Solution to midterm Exam

Unit 1 Packet Honors Math 2 1

ST3232: Design and Analysis of Experiments

OPTIMIZATION OF FIRST ORDER MODELS

Response Surface Methodology:

Six Sigma Black Belt Study Guides

MEP Pupil Text 13-19, Additional Material. Gradients of Perpendicular Lines

Two-Level Factorials (cont.)

:Effects of Data Scaling We ve already looked at the effects of data scaling on the OLS statistics, 2, and R 2. What about test statistics?

STAT 512 MidTerm I (2/21/2013) Spring 2013 INSTRUCTIONS

Candidate Name Centre Number Candidate Number MATHEMATICS UNIT 1: NON-CALCULATOR INTERMEDIATE TIER

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination Statistics June 2, 2014

with the usual assumptions about the error term. The two values of X 1 X 2 0 1

14.0 RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY (RSM)

COORDINATE GEOMETRY, EQUATIONS AND PROBLEM SOLVING TEST

Reference: CHAPTER 7 of Montgomery(8e)

IE 316 Exam 1 Fall 2011

The One-Quarter Fraction

Midterm 2 - Solutions

The 2 k Factorial Design. Dr. Mohammad Abuhaiba 1

Paper Reference(s) 6683 Edexcel GCE Statistics S1 Advanced/Advanced Subsidiary Thursday 5 June 2003 Morning Time: 1 hour 30 minutes

Reference: Chapter 8 of Montgomery (8e)

Unreplicated 2 k Factorial Designs


STAT 515 fa 2016 Lec Statistical inference - hypothesis testing

Exam for the course Statistics for scientists. Thursday, January 19,

Inference for Regression Inference about the Regression Model and Using the Regression Line, with Details. Section 10.1, 2, 3

MATH 556 Homework 13 Due: Nov 21, Wednesday

Chapter 12 - Part I: Correlation Analysis

Design of Engineering Experiments Part 5 The 2 k Factorial Design

MEEM Design of Experiments Final Take-home Exam

Fractional Replication of The 2 k Design

40.2. Interval Estimation for the Variance. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

MATH602: APPLIED STATISTICS

Design & Analysis of Experiments 7E 2009 Montgomery

Chemical Engineering: 4C3/6C3 Statistics for Engineering McMaster University: Final examination

Chapter 13 Experiments with Random Factors Solutions

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT ERT 427 Response Surface Methodology (RSM) Miss Hanna Ilyani Zulhaimi

chapter 1 vector geometry solutions V Consider the parallelogram shown alongside. Which of the following statements are true?

Reduction of Logic Equations using Karnaugh Maps

Ecn Analysis of Economic Data University of California - Davis February 23, 2010 Instructor: John Parman. Midterm 2. Name: ID Number: Section:

Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs Solutions

Strategy of Experimentation III

Chapter 6 The 2 k Factorial Design Solutions

Software Sleuth Solves Engineering Problems

Lec 10: Fractions of 2 k Factorial Design

Statistical and regression analysis of Material Removal Rate for wire cut Electro Discharge Machining of SS 304L using design of experiments

2.4.3 Estimatingσ Coefficient of Determination 2.4. ASSESSING THE MODEL 23

Math 2030 Assignment 5 Solutions

INFERENCE FOR REGRESSION

Chapter 30 Design and Analysis of

Lecture 11: Blocking and Confounding in 2 k design

CHAPTER EIGHT Linear Regression

Chapter 4: Randomized Blocks and Latin Squares

Unit 6: Fractional Factorial Experiments at Three Levels

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. PROBLEM SET No. 5 Official Solutions

W&M CSCI 628: Design of Experiments Homework 1

CHAPTER 3 THE EFFECTS OF FORCES ON MATERIALS

Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 3rd Edition

IE 361 Exam 3 (Form A)

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. Fall Exam 1

CS 147: Computer Systems Performance Analysis

Transcription:

Experimental design (KKR031, KBT120) Tuesday 11/1 2011-8:30-13:30 V Jan Rodmar will be available at ext 3024 and will visit the examination room ca 10:30. The examination results will be available for review at the earliest Friday 28/1 2011. Time for examination = 5 h Examination aids: Textbook (Douglas C. Montgomery: Design and Analysis of Experiments) with notes. No calculation examples (in book or on paper) are allowed as aid. All type of calculators are allowed. Standard Math. Tables, TEFYMA table, Beta Mathematics Handbook or Handbook of Chemistry and Physics are accepted.

Problem 1 (5 credits) An article in the Journal of Materials Engineering (1989), reported the results of an experiment to determine failure mechanisms for plasma sprayed thermal barrier coatings. The failure stress ( 10 6 Pa) for one particular coating (NiCrAlZr) under two different test conditions is as follows: Test condition 1 Test condition 2 19.8 18.5 17.6 16.7 16.7 14.8 15.4 14.1 13.6 14.9 12.7 11.9 11.4 10.1 7.9 A: Construct a 95% confidence interval on the ratio of the standard deviations, s 1 /s 2, of failure stress under the two different test conditions. Use your answer to determine whether there is a significant difference in the variances. B: Find a 95% confidence interval on the difference in mean failure stress under the two different test conditions. Does the result support the claim that the first test conditions yield higher results, on the average, than the second? Problem 2 (7 credits) The surface finish of metal parts made on three machines is being studied (high value is good). An experiment is conducted in which each machine is run by three different operators and two specimens from each operator are collected and tested. Because of the location of the machines, different operators are used on each machine, and the operators are chosen at random. The data are shown in the following table: Machine I II III Operator 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Specimens 79 94 46 92 85 76 88 53 46 62 74 57 99 79 68 75 56 57 A: Analyze the data and draw conclusions. B: Estimate if there is any significant difference between the three machines. Is any machine to prefer? Use the significance level: α = 0.05

Problem 3 (8 credits) An engineer has performed experiments in order to develop a nitride etch process on a singlewafer plasma etcher. The four factors are, the gap between the electrodes (A), the pressure in the reactor chamber (B), the flow rate of C 2 F 6 (C) and the power applied to the cathode (D). The response variable is the etch rate for silicon nitride. He decided to use a 2 4-1 design with D confounded with ABC. The resulting etch rates are shown in the table: Treatment combination (1) ad bd ab cd ac bc abcd Etch rate (y) 550 749 1052 650 1075 642 601 729 A: Calculate the main and interaction effects and examine their significance (α = 0.05). B: Decide which of the effects in confounded alias that are important. C: Calculate the residuals and plot them versus the fitted values. Comment on the plot. Problem 4 (6 credits) The production rate (y) of a chemical process depends on temperature (T) and pressure (P). The current operating conditions are T = 90 C and P = 20 bar. The company wants to increase the production with the use of the method of steepest ascent. The search starts with a 2 2 factorial experiment around the operating point with the result: T 80 100 80 100 90 P 10 10 30 30 20 y 11 0 29 6 12 A: Fit a first-order model y = β 0 + β 1 x 1 + β 2 x 2 + ε, to these data and determine the gradient direction. x 1 och x 2 are coded T resp. P,

Six experiments are then performed with the following result: T 64.5 47.5 39 30.5 43.25 34.75 P 38 50 56 62 53 69 y 43 58 72 62 65 68 B: Which of these experiments lie on the path of steepest ascent? How should one continue with the optimization? Problem 5 (8 credits) Extraction of nisin in aqueous two-phase systems has been investigated. The nisin recovery (y) depends on the two regressor variables concentration (%) of PEG 4000 (x 1 ) and concentration (%) of Na 2 SO 4 (x 2 ). Experiments have been run according to a 2 2 -design with center points and the result obtained is as follow: x 1-1 1-1 1 0 0 0 0 0 x 2-1 -1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 y 62.9 76.1 87.5 92.3 76.2 77.5 76.8 77.4 78.7 A: Fit the model y = β 0 + β 1 x 1 + β 2 x 2 + β 12 x 1 x 2 + ε to the data and examine parameter significance. B: Examine model significance and lack-of- fit. C: Estimate the confidence interval on the mean response at the point x=[0.5 1] Use α = 0.05

Problem 6 (6 credits) The figure below shows four general patterns for residual graphs, where the residuals e are plotted against the predicted response Ŷ or the independent variable X. A: Some of the patterns are unsatisfactory. Explain what the plots indicate and suggest proper remedies to eliminate these anomalies. B: Answer the following statements with true or false: 1. The vector of fitted values Ŷ is always orthogonal to the vector of residuals e. 2. The R 2 statistic is not the square of the correlation between the Y and Ŷ columns. 3. If we fit a straight line y = β 0 + β 1 x+ ε, and we find that b 0 = 0 exactly, then the residuals will still add to zero 4. An observation cannot be both influential and an outlier.