Thomas Johansson DYNAmore Nordic AB. Drop Test Simulation

Similar documents
Simulation of flow induced vibrations in pipes using the LS-DYNA ICFD solver

LS-DYNA Turbine Blade-Out (Disk Burst) Containment Analysis

Coupling of the EM Solver with Mechanical and Thermal Shell Elements

Coupling Possibilities in LS-DYNA: Development Status and Sample Applications

Fire resistance simulation using LS-DYNA. Mikael Schill

Numerical simulation the bottom structures. grounding test by LS-DYNA

Outline. Tension test of stainless steel type 301. Forming including the TRIP-effect

SECTION 1. Introduction to MD NASTRAN SOL 400

PROGRAMMING THE TRANSIENT EXPLICIT FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS WITH MATLAB

Lecture #10: Anisotropic plasticity Crashworthiness Basics of shell elements

Particle Dynamics with MBD and FEA Using CUDA

Numerical crashworthiness analysis of an offshore wind turbine monopile impacted by a ship

Update On The Electromagnetism Module In LS-DYNA

Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study of Electromagnetic Forming

LS-DYNA Peridynamics for Brittle Failure Analysis

9th European LS-DYNA Conference 2013

EQUIVALENT FRACTURE ENERGY CONCEPT FOR DYNAMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF PROTOTYPE RC GIRDERS

*MAT_PAPER - a new orthotropic elastoplastic model for paper materials

ANSYS Explicit Dynamics Update. Mai Doan

A STUDY ON SLUG INDUCED STRESSES USING FILE-BASED COUPLING TECHNIQUE

NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF FAILURE IN STEEL BEAMS UNDER IMPACT CONDITIONS

MEG 795 COURSE PROJECT

Crash Simulation and Analysis of a Car Body Using ANSYS LS- DYNA

Towards Efficient Finite Element Model Review Dr. Richard Witasse, Plaxis bv (based on the original presentation of Dr.

Effect Of The In-Situ Stress Field On Casing Failure *

DISPENSA FEM in MSC. Nastran

Recommended teaching texts Theory:

Electromagnetics in LS-DYNA

Anisotropic modeling of short fibers reinforced thermoplastics materials with LS-DYNA

STRAIN ASSESSMENT USFOS

IMPACT PROPERTY AND POST IMPACT VIBRATION BETWEEN TWO IDENTICAL SPHERES

Experimentally Calibrating Cohesive Zone Models for Structural Automotive Adhesives

A Simple Weak-Field Coupling Benchmark Test of the Electromagnetic-Thermal-Structural Solution Capabilities of LS-DYNA Using Parallel Current Wires

Course in. Geometric nonlinearity. Nonlinear FEM. Computational Mechanics, AAU, Esbjerg

6 th Pipeline Technology Conference 2011

2D Liquefaction Analysis for Bridge Abutment

A new simplified design method for steel structures under impulsive loading

Chapter 2 Finite Element Formulations

Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Shells Subjected to Impact Loads

Impact Simulation of Extreme Wind Generated Missiles on Radioactive Waste Storage Facilities

VESSEL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR RISER PROTECTION FRAME AND PROTECTION NET SUPPORTS ON SEMI- SUBMERSIBLE OFFSHORE STRUCTURES

A Distributed Randles Circuit Model for Battery Abuse Simulations Using LS-DYNA

ANALYTICAL PENDULUM METHOD USED TO PREDICT THE ROLLOVER BEHAVIOR OF A BODY STRUCTURE

Procedure for Performing Stress Analysis by Means of Finite Element Method (FEM)

Finite element prediction of the ultimate axial load capacity of V-section band clamps

New Developments of Frequency Domain Acoustic Methods in LS-DYNA

NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF SUBMERGED AND PRESSURISED X65 STEEL PIPES COMPLAS XII

DUCTILITY BEHAVIOR OF A STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALL BY EXPLICIT DYNAMIC ANALYZING

Vibration Analysis. with SOLIDWORKS Simulation 2018 SDC. Paul M. Kurowski. Better Textbooks. Lower Prices.

Static & Dynamic. Analysis of Structures. Edward L.Wilson. University of California, Berkeley. Fourth Edition. Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering

MSC Nastran N is for NonLinear as in SOL400. Shekhar Kanetkar, PhD

Modal Analysis: What it is and is not Gerrit Visser

Anisotropic plasticity, anisotropic failure and their application to the simulation of aluminium extrusions under crash loads

The Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing , China

FEA A Guide to Good Practice. What to expect when you re expecting FEA A guide to good practice

Basics of Finite Element Analysis. Strength of Materials, Solid Mechanics

Modelling of ductile failure in metal forming

EDEM DISCRETIZATION (Phase II) Normal Direction Structure Idealization Tangential Direction Pore spring Contact spring SPRING TYPES Inner edge Inner d

FVM for Fluid-Structure Interaction with Large Structural Displacements

OMAE FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION MODELING OF SUBSEA JUMPER PIPE

A METHOD TO ASSESS IMPACT DAMAGE USING A SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS AND FINITE ELEMENT COUPLED APPROACH

Theoretical Manual Theoretical background to the Strand7 finite element analysis system

ASME V&V Authors: Marcus Gamino Samuel Abankwa Ricardo Silva Edwin Johnson Michael Fisher

Severe accident risk assessment for Nuclear. Power Plants

Measurement of deformation. Measurement of elastic force. Constitutive law. Finite element method

TOWARDS A VALIDATED PIPELINE DENT INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT MODEL

General Guidelines for Crash Analysis in LS-DYNA. Suri Bala Jim Day. Copyright Livermore Software Technology Corporation

Reservoir Simulator Compaction Modelling: A Predictor for Accelerated Coupled Rock Mechanics -- Reservoir Simulation

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LINEAR-ELASTIC AND NONLINEAR- INELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSES OF FLUID-TANK SYSTEMS

Modeling non-isothermal thermoforming of fabricreinforced thermoplastic composites

Example 37 - Analytical Beam

A two-dimensional FE truss program

Burst Pressure Prediction of Multiple Cracks in Pipelines

The Effect of Distribution for a Moving Force

Calibration and Experimental Validation of LS-DYNA Composite Material Models by Multi Objective Optimization Techniques

Modelling of bird strike on the engine fan blades using FE-SPH

Onset of levitation in thrust bearing: FSI study using Abaqus-FlowVision coupling

Parameter identification of damage parameters of LS-DYNA GURSON material model from a tensile test. Lectures. Johannes Will

Finite Element Method

Seismic Response Analysis of Structure Supported by Piles Subjected to Very Large Earthquake Based on 3D-FEM

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 88 (2014 )

Non-linear fracture mechanics in LS-DYNA and LS-PrePost

World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Physical and Mathematical Sciences Vol:5, No:11, 2011.

Abstract. 1 Introduction

ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY AEA ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY REPORT. Appendix B8. Finite Element Analysis

Bird-Strike Modeling Based on the Lagrangian Formulation Using LS-DYNA

A Repeated Dynamic Impact Analysis for 7x7 Spacer Grids by using ABAQUS/ Standard and Explicit

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 5, Issue 8, August ISSN

Compressive Residual Stress Optimization in Laser Peening of a Curved Geometry

DESCRIBING THE PLASTIC DEFORMATION OF ALUMINUM SOFTBALL BATS

14. LS-DYNA Forum 2016

Jihoon Kim, George J. Moridis, John Edmiston, Evan S. Um, Ernest Majer. Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 24 Mar.

The Design of Polyurethane Parts: Using Closed Solutions and Finite Element Analysis to Obtain Optimal Results

Comparison of crash tests and simulations for various vehicle restraint systems

Jonathan Fraser METEOR Project P07102 Environmental Test Stand Project Manager/Lead Engineer Detail Design Review Report

Effects of the semi die/plug angles on cold tube drawing with a fixed plug by FEM for AISI 1010 steel tube

DEFORMATION AND FRACTURE ANALYSIS OF ELASTIC SOLIDS BASED ON A PARTICLE METHOD

Multi-Scale Modeling of Crash & Failure of Reinforced Plastics Parts with DIGIMAT to LS-DYNA interface

FLAC3D analysis on soil moving through piles

Electromechanics in LS-DYNA R7

Transcription:

Thomas Johansson DYNAmore Nordic AB Drop Test Simulation

Plastic Work Displacement LS-DYNA solve all your applications One Code for Multi-Physics Solutions Thermal Solver Implicit Double precision EM Solver Implicit Air (BEM) Conductors (FEM) Double precision Temperature Fluid Solver Implicit / Explicit ICFD / CESE ALE / CPM Double precision Mechanical Solver Implicit / Explicit Double precision / Single precision

Drop Testing Short duration Large deformations Non linearities Material properties Parts into contacts Explicit solver is the starting point => Core of LS-DYNA!!!

LS-DYNA Impact problems I Drop tests Most of non-coupled simulations Prediction of deceleration Prediction of failure Consumer goods (e.g. chain saw) Offshore applications oil pipes

Drop Test - modelling approach Geometry Standard element formulation Shells/Solid Appropriate material model More than 200 different model available Connection between parts Contacts Rivets/bolts/welds Initial velocity Gravity

Drop Test More options/possibilities exists of course.

LS-DYNA Impact problems II Coupled simulations Impact with birds Failure of turbine blade Watering

Case 1: Trawl gear impact on pipeline based on DNV RP F111 Methodology based on DNV RP F111 Non-linear FEA using LS-DYNA 400.000 shell elements for the pipeline 1.5 million solid elements for the soil Impact duration 0.25 seconds Offshore impact analysis 8

Soil prestressing Offshore impact analysis 9

Impact simulation Offshore impact analysis 10

Case 2: Full scale FSI - Rock berm protected pipeline overtrawling Coupling: Fluid Structural DEM/DES Offshore impact analysis 11

Model set-up Artificial representation of trawl MMALE representation of water DEM representation of rock berm FEM (beam elements) representation of rigging gear Towing node, prescribed velocity 12

Simulation result Offshore impact analysis 13

LS-DYNA Drop Test Coupling ICFD structural DEM - structural

Dropping Frame LS-DYNA Explicit Scalability

Dropping Frame LS-DYNA Explicit Scalability Dropping frame on rigid plane 338 000 deformable shell elements Uniform element size: 10 x 10 mm t = 0,5 s Initial velocity + gravity All nodes in the frame are in contact with the rigid plane 1 part made of steel defined using a isotropic material model. (true stress strain curve from tensile testing)

Dropping Frame LS-DYNA Explicit LS-DYNA R7 MPP 2 cores MPP 4 cores MPP 8 cores Very good scaling!

How to speed up the simulations??? How do I get results faster? 1. Buy more licenses!!!! 2. Clusters for parallel execution 3. Refine the model where it is needed 4. Simplify 5. Use built-in features, e.g SMS (Selective Mass Scaling)

t t n n n n n n i n e n n 2 1/ 1 2 1/ 2 1/ 1 ) ( v u u a v v f f M a Explicit Finite Elements Geometry update Mass matrix diagonal Stability I m m M n m e e e e e e e e e El m l E t min min 2 max Seminar, Porsche, 2013

Mass Scaling Conventional Mass Scaling: Adding mass to increase time step! Mass matrix still diagonal Shorter simulation time -> YES!. But higher mass also affect the Kinetic Energy. Selective Mass Scaling is a more advanced way of introducing mass to the system without affecting the kinetic energy (=mass) too much. Suppress high frequency content and leave low freqency modes unaffected (most deformations tend to deform in low frequency mode) ω/ ω 0 ω/ ω 0 i i CMS SMS Modify the structure of the added mass matrix to select affected modes

Selective mass scaling Implemented in LS-DYNA by DYNAmore Nordic AB Activated on *CONTROL_TIMESTEP Can be applied to specific Part sets in the simulation recommended!

Dropping Frame LS-DYNA Explicit, Selective Mass Scaling Using traditional mass scaling (scaling of density) can be used for a lot of analysis but NOT when the problem is dynamic. Selective mass scaling. 8 cores: 4h 38min - No mass scaling 8 cores: 29 min Selective mass scaling 9 times faster!!!! Kinetic energy

Comments Selective Mass Scaling Mass matrix not diagonal, requires solution of linear system of equations Ma f Penalty => too large time step will negatively affect CPU time Apply SMS to critical parts that require fine mesh Problem dependent => trial and error

Thank you! Your LS-DYNA distributor and more