Susan Pool Ray Boswell J. Eric Lewis Jonathan P. Mathews WVGES USDOE/NETL WVGES Penn State

Similar documents
Burket/Geneseo Shale Appalachia s little brother to the Marcellus & Utica

Bob Cluff The Discovery Group, Denver, Colorado Mike Miller Cimarex, Tulsa, Oklahoma April 2010 DWLS luncheon

OVERVIEW OF THE ROGERSVILLE SHALE IN WEST VIRGINIA. Philip Dinterman West Virginia Geological & Economic Survey May 11, 2017

GEOLOGY, RESOURCES, AND POTENTIAL ACTIVITY LEVELS

ENHANCEMENT OF THE APPALACHIAN BASIN DEVONIAN SHALE RESOURCE BASE IN THE GRI HYDROCARBON MODEL. GRI Contract No

Barnett Shale-Woodford Shale play of the Delaware basin is it another giant shale gas field in Texas?

Calculating Total Organic Carbon (TOC) using the Passey Method

Mixed Reservoir Wetting in Unconventional Reservoirs and Interpretation of Porosity/Resistivity Cross Plots, Derived From Triple-combo Log Data

A Case Study into the Successful Evaluation and Completion Nonconventional. Jorge Viamontes, PhD VP Reservoir Intelligence, NUTECH

Technology of Production from Shale

Exploration / Appraisal of Shales. Petrophysics Technical Manager Unconventional Resources

A Review of Three North American Shale Plays: Learnings from Shale Gas Exploration in the Americas*

Property of interest Core data Most useful log data. TOC LECO or RockEval GR, density, resistivity. Mineralogy XRD, FTIR, XRF Most + ECS-style logs

NORTH AMERICAN ANALOGUES AND STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS IN DEVELOPING SHALE GAS PLAYS IN EUROPE Unconventional Gas Shale in Poland: A Look at the Science

Determination of Duvernay Formation Reservoir Properties through Probabilistic Petrophysical Analysis calibrated to Core Studies.

Using Conventional Open Hole Log Data to Generate Petrophysical Models for Unconventional Reservoirs

Search and Discovery Article #10532 (2013)** Posted October 21, Abstract

Stephanie B. Gaswirth and Kristen R. Mara

An Integrated Petrophysical Approach for Shale Gas Reservoirs

Water Resources and Natural Gas Production from the Marcellus Shale. Daniel J. Soeder Hydrologist U.S. Geological Survey

Numerical Simulation and Multiple Realizations for Sensitivity Study of Shale Gas Reservoir

Geology of the Louisiana Haynesville Shale Play

by Bogdan Popescu Zeta Petroleum (Romania) and Serban Veliciu - Center for Green Energy Information (Geneva)

UNCONVENTIONAL RESERVOIR ASSESSMENT USING MUDLOGGING

Chapter GL GLOSSARY. in U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series 60. By T. R. Klett, James W. Schmoker, Ronald R. Charpentier, Thomas S.

Black Road, Tax ID = , 22.7 ac Wilmot Township, Bradford County, PA. Geologic Summary

Workflows for Sweet Spots Identification in Shale Plays Using Seismic Inversion and Well Logs

Estimating Major and Minor Natural Fracture Patterns in Gas Shales Using Production Data

OGIP Evaluation of Shale Gas and CBM with Basin Modeling and Gas Isotopes Interpretation*

Unconventional Natural Gas Assessment for the Cordova Embayment in Northeastern British Columbia

Utica Shale Drilling Activity and Resource Assessment in Ohio

Content. Conventional and Continuous Resources Concepts and Examples. Threshold geological parameters for source-rock resource potential

Mike Solt, a WVU GEOL alumnus just sent a message, which might be of interest to those of you looking for an internship this summer:

- logr separation method (the most widely used approach for estimating organic richness) - Clay Indicator-GR separation method

SCOOP Woodford. Regional Field Study

Kinetics of the Opal-A to Opal-CT Phase Transition in Low- and High-TOC Siliceous Shale Source Rocks*

Tax ID = ac Athens Township, Bradford County, PA. Geologic Summary

South Texas* Paul C. Hackley 1, Kristin Dennen 1, Rachel Gesserman 1, and Jennie L. Ridgley 2

STACK/STACK EXTENSION MERAMEC /OSAGE/ WOODFORD STUDY

MIDWEST REGIONAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION PARTNERSHIP PHASE II STORAGE CAPACITY POTENTIAL OVERVIEW

TOC LECO or RockEval GR, density, resistivity. Mineralogy XRD, FTIR, XRF Density, neutron, Pe, ECS-type logs

For personal use only

Seismic characterization of Montney shale formation using Passey s approach

Relationships of the Ordovician. Appalachian Basin. June 21, 2011

Tim Carr - West Virginia University

Shale Capacity Key In Shale Modeling

SPE Abstract. Introduction

Comparison of Reservoir Quality from La Luna, Gacheta and US Shale Formations*

Petrophysics. Theory and Practice of Measuring. Properties. Reservoir Rock and Fluid Transport. Fourth Edition. Djebbar Tiab. Donaldson. Erie C.

PROSPECT EVALUATION OF UNCONVENTIONAL PLAYS IN RUSSIA EPUG 2014

West Virginia LITHOSTRATIGRAPHY OF MIDDLE AND UPPER DEVONIAN ORGANIC-RICH SHALES IN WEST VIRGINIA. Geological and Economic Survey

Global Overview of Petroleum Resources Thomas Ahlbrandt USGS World Energy Project Chief

Application Note ( )

Integrated Reservoir Study for Designing CO 2 -Foam EOR Field Pilot

U.S. Shale Gas. From Resources and Reserves to Carbon Isotope Anomalies. John B. Curtis Potential Gas Agency Colorado School of Mines

Search and Discovery Article #80542 (2016)** Posted August 8, 2016

Recap and Integrated Rock Mechanics and Natural Fracture Study on the Bakken Formation, Williston Basin Abstract Figure 1:

Optimizing Vaca Muerta Development

Core Technology for Evaluating the Bakken

egamls Inc. What we do: Well and field studies using GAMLS software (plus GAMLS licensing)

APPALACHIAN STORAGE HUB (ASH) PROJECT. Semi-Annual Meeting March 14, 2017 WVU Erickson Alumni Center

2016 U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Continuous Oil and Gas Resources in the Mancos Shale of the Piceance Basin

Drill Cuttings Analysis: How to Determine the Geology of a Formation and Reservoir

Determination of Reservoir Properties from XRF Elemental Data in the Montney Formation

GEOLOGICAL LOG INTERPRETATION TUTORIAL

North GOM Petroleum Systems: Modeling the Burial and Thermal History, Organic Maturation, and Hydrocarbon Generation and Expulsion

Role of Geochemistry in Unconventional Resource Development. Shikha Sharma Dept. of Geology & Geography

Key Elements of the Petroleum Systems of the Rockall and Slyne-Erris Basins

Thin Sweet Spots Identification in the Duvernay Formation of North Central Alberta*

Overview of Selected Shale Plays in New Mexico*

QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC RESPONSE TO TOTAL-ORGANIC-CONTENT AND THERMAL MATURITY IN SHALE GAS PLAYS

Tim Carr - West Virginia University

Results and Methodology from ANH (Colombia) Unconventional Resources Core Project

Downloaded 10/25/16 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF THE WEATHERING POTENTIAL OF MARCELLUS SHALE DRILL CUTTINGS

UNCONVENTIONAL OIL & GAS POTENTIAL IN PORTUGAL

But these are what we really measure with logs..

Update on Prospectivity Studies of the Georgina and Cooper Basins

Shale Reservoirs Similar, yet so different. AAPG ICE Calgary September 13, 2010

Petroleum geology framework, West Coast offshore region

Integrated 3D Geological Model of the Mississippian Devonian Bakken Formation, Elm Coulee, Williston Basin: Richland County, Montana

Global balance sheet of the. Resources Shale Gas in the world

Evaluation of Coal Bed Methane through Wire Line Logs Jharia field: A Case Study

Enhanced Formation Evaluation of Shales Using NMR Secular Relaxation*

Update on the Berea Sandstone Oil Play in Kentucky

MAPPING AND RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION OF GEOLOGIC INTERVALS FOR NGL STORAGE APPLICATIONS

Basin modeling: the key for unconventional shale gas assessment

Petrophysics Designed to Honour Core Duvernay & Triassic

Relinquishment Report

INTRODUCTION TO WELL LOGS And BAYES THEOREM

BENEFITS OF HIGH-RESOLUTION CORE LOGS INTEGRATION IN CHARACTERIZING GAS SHALES CORES

Well Evaluation. An Integrated Well-Evaluation Process for Shale Gas Reservoirs

Geophysical and geomechanical rock property templates for source rocks Malleswar Yenugu, Ikon Science Americas, USA

Dr. Douglas Patchen WVU Energy Institute s NRCCE Director, Appalachian Region for PTTC PSU Extension Webinar January 18, 2018

Advances in Elemental Spectroscopy Logging: A Cased Hole Application Offshore West Africa

The Giant Continuous Oil Accumulation in the Bakken Petroleum System, Williston Basin

FY 2013 Annual Technical Report for NCRDS State Cooperative Program

Adsorption Isotherm Measurements of Gas Shales for Subsurface Temperature and Pressure Conditions

Shale Gas Plays Screening Criteria A Sweet Spot Evaluation Methodology

A Geologic Play Book for Utica Shale Appalachian Basin Exploration

Transcription:

Susan Pool Ray Boswell J. Eric Lewis Jonathan P. Mathews WVGES USDOE/NETL WVGES Penn State

Presentation Outline Background Purpose Methodology and Data Preliminary Results Future Work 22

Background Because of interest in and activity related to Marcellus Shale, WVGES is examining basic data, much of which is new, as well as updating and developing Marcellus specific materials. Example of some current WVGES materials which are a mix of newer and older data and maps. WVGES 1980, 2012 Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 3

The purpose of the study is to: Purpose Collect and investigate basic geologic data Conduct preliminary resource assessment Identify requirements to improve assessment Make selected data and maps available and provide an up to date web based GIS map application Investigate development of a framework for the State to evaluate other petroleum resources Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 4

Purpose Key research questions for the project include: How much natural gas is likely to be contained in the Marcellus Shale underlying West Virginia? How is the gas distributed? How do the key parameters that affect gas recoverability vary geographically? Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 5

Methodology and Data Approaches to estimating natural gas resource volumes for continuous unconventional reservoirs include: those that use production data to estimate technically recoverable resources directly and those that use geologic data to estimate total original gas in place. Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 6

Methodology and Data Both methods have advantages and disadvantages, but ultimately the two approaches can be combined to obtain a fuller understanding of the resource and its potential. By using both approaches, we may be able to estimate and capture the evolution or recovery factors. Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 7

Methodology and Data The study will be divided into 2 phases to accomodate both approaches. Phase 1 will use the geology based approach to estimate total original gas in place. total original gas in place = free gas in place + adsorbed gas in place Free Gas In Place GIP free = ( eff * (1 S w ) * H fm * A gc ) / FVF Adsorbed Gas in Place GIP adsorb = G c * fm * H fm * A gc Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 8

Methodology and Data Where will all of the data be obtained? H fm, fm,, and S w are derived from well logs with and S w adjusted for V sh and V ker TOC is taken from published core based studies G c is determined from TOC and pressure FVF is derived from temperature, pressure, and gas compressibility Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 9

Methodology and Data The study is being conducted using public data from: Well logs (WVGES, IHS) Depth / Thickness / Extent Porosity Resistivity Temperature Literature (WVGES, USGS, U.S. DOE/EGSP, WVU) Vitrinite reflectance data Core data Volume of shale Volume of kerogen Total organic carbon Source: IGT, 1986 Operator reports (WVGES) Pressure Production volumes Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 10

Methodology and Data However, the study could be improved with additional data from core related to: Porosity Volume of shale Volume of kerogen Total organic carbon Gas content and Total organic carbon gas content functions Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 11

Methodology and Data: Phase 1 Assessment Steps 1. Select wells 2. Correlate well logs Marcellus Shale Resource Assessment Study Wells 3. Extract data from well logs 4. Derive additional required data 5. Characterize reservoir 6. Estimate volumes 7. Correct and refine data as necessary Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 12

Methodology and Data: Step 1 Select Wells Marcellus Shale Reservoir Characterization Study Wells in Gray Based on Vertical wells Geographic distribution Log availability GR, POR, RES Newest vintage Digital data Marcellus Shale Volumetric Estimation Study Wells in Red Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 13

Methodology and Data: Step 2 Correlate Well Logs Harrell Shale (Burket Member)/ Genesee Formation (Geneseo Member) Tully Limestone X section image in development Mahantango Formation Upper Marcellus A Upper Marcellus B Purcell Limestone Member Lower Marcellus transition zone Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 14

Methodology and Data: Step 3 Extract Data from Well Logs Depth Thickness Porosity Resistivity Marcellus Temperature Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 15

Methodology and Data: Step 4 Derive Additional Required Data Marcellus Shale Level of Organic Maturity derived from USGS/WVGES vitrinite reflectance data Upper Marcellus Total Organic Carbon (in Percent) extrapolated from data in Wang 2012 Derive: LOM TOC Derived from data in USGS/WVGES (2005) Lower Marcellus Total Organic Carbon (in Percent) extrapolated from data in Wang 2012 Extrapolated from data in Wang (2012) Calibrated to limited public core data EGSP WV#6 EGSP WV#7 Others Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 16

Methodology and Data: Step 4 Derive Additional Required Data Upper Marcellus Volume of Shale (in Percent) extrapolated from data in Wang 2012 And, derive: V sh Extrapolated from data in Wang(2012) Calibrated to limited public core data EGSP WV#6, EGSP WV#7, Others Lower Marcellus Volume of Shale (in Percent) extrapolated from data in Wang 2012 Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 17

Preliminary Results: Step 5 Characterize Reservoir Marcellus Shale Pressure Gradient (in psi/ft) from operator reported data Develop: pressure and temperature maps Marcellus Shale Temperature (in degrees F) derived from well log data Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 18

Preliminary Results: Step 5 Characterize Reservoir Marcellus Shale Upper A ; Upper B and Lower Thickness (in feet) derived from well log data Develop: additional basic maps such as thickness Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 19

Preliminary Results: Step 5 Characterize Reservoir Marcellus Shale Upper A ; Upper B and Lower Percentage of the Interval 100 API Over Gamma Ray Baseline derived from well log data Develop: specialized maps such as high organic content Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 20

Preliminary Results: Step 6 Estimate Volumes Marcellus Shale Resource Assessment Original Gas in Place Estimate (in Bcf/mi 2 ) Develop: basic map related to volumes Source: WVGES Date: May 17, 2013 Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 21

Preliminary Results: Step 6 Estimate Volumes Upper Marcellus A Marcellus Shale Resource Assessment Original Gas in Place Estimate (in Bcf/mi 2 ) Develop: specialized maps related to volumes Source: WVGES Date: May 17, 2013 Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 22

Preliminary Results: Step 6 Estimate Volumes Upper Marcellus A Marcellus Shale Resource Assessment Original Gas in Place Estimate (in Bcf/mi 2 ) Upper Marcellus B Source: WVGES Date: May 17, 2013 Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 23

Preliminary Results: Step 6 Estimate Volumes Upper Marcellus A Marcellus Shale Resource Assessment Original Gas in Place Estimate (in Bcf/mi 2 ) Upper Marcellus B Lower Marcellus Source: WVGES Date: May 17, 2013 Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 24

Preliminary Results: Step 6 Estimate Volumes Marcellus Shale Upper A ; Upper B and Lower Ratio of Adsorbed to Free Gas derived from well log data Develop: additional specialized maps Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 25

Preliminary Results: Step 6 Estimate Volumes And the preliminary number is: Source: WVGES Date: May 17, 2013 Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 26

Preliminary Results: Step 6 Estimate Volumes And the preliminary number is: 122 Tcf gas in place Source: WVGES Date: May 17, 2013 Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 27

Future Work: Finalize Assessment Incorporate additional well data Recalibrate all well data to core Investigate further: 1. porosity 2. V sh V ker 3. G c and TOC G c functions Refine volume estimates Investigate production and recovery factor(s) Phase 2 of Study Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 28

Future Work: Release Results and Products For the Marcellus Shale in West Virginia: estimate of total original natural gas in place volume (refined) estimate of current recoverable natural gas volume cross sections and maps including maps for: wells, location / extent, thickness, depth, pressure, and volumes up to date, publicly accessible web based map application Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 29

Future Work: Release Results and Products Data will be updated and new maps and features will be added to the Marcellus Shale web based map application. Background Purpose Methodology/Data Preliminary Results Future Work 30

Acknowledgements IHS Mike Hohn, Mary Behling, Jessica Moore, Susan Kite, Sam McCreery, John Bocan, John Saucer, Phil Dinterman, Ron McDowell, and Tom Repine West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey Doug Miller, Beth King, and Kelly Moran Penn State 31

Questions, Comments, or Suggestions? 32