Automated volume measurement for weihts using acoustic volumeter

Similar documents
EURAMET Project 858: Hydrostatic weighing exchange of experiences. Project outline

Mass determination of 1 kg silicon spheres for Avogadro project

Air Density Determination Using 1 kg Buoyancy Mass Comparison(III)

Final Report on APMP.M.M-K4.1 - Bilateral Comparison of 1 kg Stainless Steel Mass Standards between KRISS and A*STAR

CCT/10-21 Extrapolation of the ITS-90 down to the boiling point of nitrogen from the triple point of argon

Traceable Mass Determination and Uncertainty Calculation

EVALUATION OF ADSORPTION EFFECT BY USING SILICON SPHERE AND SILICON SURFACE ARTEFACTS

PTB S 16.5 MN HYDRAULIC AMPLIFICATION MACHINE AFTER MODERNIZATION

Application of a self-calibratable rotary encoder

BUREAU INTERNATIONAL DES POIDS ET MESURES

AE 3051, Lab #16. Investigation of the Ideal Gas State Equation. By: George P. Burdell. Group E3

OIML D 28 DOCUMENT. Edition 2004 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION. Conventional value of the result of weighing in air

CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDITATION

Preparation Primary Gas Reference Material (PGRM) by using NIMT Facilities

Application of the Multi-current Transient Hot-Wire Technique for Absolute Measurements of the Thermal Conductivity of Glycols

Morehouse. Edward Lane, Morehouse Instrument Company 1742 Sixth Ave York, PA PH: web: sales:

Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators

Technical Protocol of the CIPM Key Comparison CCAUV.V-K5

EA-10/13. EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators. Publication Reference PURPOSE

Temperature Scales. Temperature, and Temperature Dependent on Physical Properties. Temperature. Temperature Scale

Physics 107 TUTORIAL ASSIGNMENT #6

CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDITATION

ME-B41 Lab 1: Hydrostatics. Experimental Procedures

ENERGY DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS IN A LOW HEAD FRANCIS TURBINE DURING THERMODYNAMIC EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENTS

National Physical Laboratory New Delhi

TYPICAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY DEFINED BY AN FPG8601 FORCE BALANCED PISTON GAUGE

W 18e Heat Capacity Ratio γ

CONSOLIDATED GRANULAR MEDIA FOR SOUND INSULATION: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION THROUGH DIFFERENT METHODS

Oscillating Flow Characteristics of a Regenerator under Low Temperature Conditions

Dependence of Levitation Force on Frequency of an Oscillating Magnetic Levitation Field in a Bulk YBCO Superconductor

CALCULATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CHEMICAL ANALYSIS. A.Gnanavelu

THE ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMNET SYSTEM USING TWO MICROPHONES

REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENTS OF WOVEN IMAGE ECHO PANEL 7MM TESTED WITH A 20MM AIR GAP IN A REVERBERATION ROOM.

CHAPTER 4 THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY AND VISCOSITY MEASUREMENTS

Chapter Four. Experimental

b) Fluid friction: occurs when adjacent layers in a fluid are moving at different velocities.

< Final report > Report on the APMP.M.F-S1 supplementary comparison for 2 MN Force

Sound. Measure the speed of sound in air by means of resonance in a tube; Measure the speed of sound in a metal rod using Kundt s tube.

MASS DETERMINATION OF SILICON SPHERES USED FOR THE AVOGADRO PROJECT

CMM Uncertainty Budget

Engineering Unit 1: Engineering Principles

Measurements on Quarterwavelength Tubes and Helmholtz Resonators

MASS AND VOLUME COMPARISONS AT MIKES

Essentials of expressing measurement uncertainty

Type UB1 Load Cell. Option Stainless steel cable gland

Calibration of capacitance diaphragm gauges with 1333 Pa full scale by direct comparison to resonant silicon gauge and static expansion system

IMPLEMENTATION OF ETHANOL HEAT PIPE AT CETIAT

THERMOCOUPLE CHARACTERISTICS TRAINER

Accuracy Calibration Certificate

AN AUTOMATED ADSORPTION ISOTHERM DEVICE

Flow Management Devices, LLC An ISO 9000:2008 Certified Company

LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF THE SOUND ABSORPTION OF CLASSICTONE 700 ASTM C Type E Mounting. Test Number 2

PC TOOL FOR DATA ANALYSIS IN CALIBRATION OF SPECIAL WEIGHTS

EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Indicators and Simulators by Electrical Simulation and Measurement

SAMPLE. Accuracy Calibration Certificate. Mettler Toledo 1900 Polaris Parkway Contact: Instrument Type: EURAMET cg-18 v. 4.0 Sample ACC WI v.1.

Establishing traceability and estimating measurement uncertainty in physical, chemical and biological measurements

Design against fluctuating load

APPENDIX 1 DESCRIPTION OF HOT WIRE ANEMOMETER

FAVIMAT (AI)ROBOT2 FAVIGRAPH. Automatic Single-Fibre Testers

PROPERTY STUDY ON EMATS WITH VISUALIZATION OF ULTRASONIC PROPAGATION

Comparison between the CENAM (Mexico) 150 kn and the INRiM (Italy) 1 MN force standard machines

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge Ordinary Level

Testing Procedure: AS ISO

A combinatorial technique for weighbridge verification

ICSE Physics SECTION I (40 Marks) Attempt all questions from this Section

Final Report on the Torque Key Comparison CCM.T-K2 Measurand Torque: 0 kn m, 10 kn m, 20 kn m Dirk Röske 1), Koji Ogushi 2)

Study on a thermal diffusivity standard for the laser flash method measurements 1

BUREAU INTERNATIONAL DES POIDS ET MESURES

Installation guide 862 MIT / MIR

3/4W, 2010 Low Resistance Chip Resistor

Static pressure and temperature coefficients of working standard microphones

T h e rm i s t o r s

Thermoacoustic analysis of a pulse tube refrigerator

Supplementary Figures

DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, AND COMMISSIONING OF A 120 kn DEADWEIGHT FORCE STANDARD MACHINE

Measurement Uncertainty in the DTA Temperature Calibration

Guidelines on the Calibration of Automatic Instruments for Weighing Road Vehicles in Motion and Measuring Axle Loads AWICal WIM Guide May 2018


STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF LASER MARKING FOR STANDARD WEIGHTS

Calculate the force F needed to produce a horizontal component of 300 N on the sledge (1)

To study the acoustic normal modes of air-filled cavities of rectangular and cylindrical geometry.

Glossary Innovative Measurement Solutions

CHAPTER 5 CONVECTIVE HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT

CHAPTER 6 FRICTION AND WEAR ANALYSIS FOR BUSHING

Class XI Physics. Ch. 9: Mechanical Properties of solids. NCERT Solutions

SAMPLE. Accuracy Calibration Certificate. Instrument Type: EURAMET cg-18 v. 4.0 Sample ACC ISO17025 WI v.1.0

NIST ELECTROSTATIC FORCE BALANCE EXPERIMENT

Numerical Modelling of Dynamic Earth Force Transmission to Underground Structures

Q1. A) 21.0 ms B) 63.1 ms C) 31.5 ms D) 45.2 ms E) 73.1 ms. Ans: Q2.

NORMAL STRESS. The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts.

Publication V. M. Heinonen and S. Sillanpää, The effect of density gradients on hydrometers, Measurement Science and Technology 14, (2003).

THE NEW 1.1 MN m TORQUE STANDARD MACHINE OF THE PTB BRAUNSCHWEIG/GERMANY

A simple calorimetric method to avoid artifacts in a controversial field: the ice calorimeter

He II Heat transfer through a Corrugated Tube - Test Report

Tel: Fax: PRODUCT INFORMATION

PHYSICS. 2. A force of 6 kgf and another force of 8 kg f can be applied to produce the effect of a single force equal to

Estimation of Uncertainty of Air Buoyancy Correction for Establishment of Primary Mass Standards

115 Adopted:

Optical Method for Micro Force Measurement. Yusaku FUJII Gunma University

Final Report August 2010

Transcription:

IMEKO 20th TC3, 3rd TC16 and 1st TC22 International Conference Cultivating metrological knowledge 27th to 30th November, 2007. Merida, Mexico. Automated volume measurement for weihts using acoustic volumeter Abstract M. Ueki 1, T. Kobata 1, K. Ueda 1 and A. Ooiwa 1 1 National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), AIST An automated method using an acoustic volumeter to measure the volume of weights mass ranging from 1 g to 100 g is described. The automated system consists of a manipulator of three-axis motion, a container lifting mechanism, a stationary weight magazine with 30 weights positions, a control unit, a personal computer and an acoustic volumeter. The acoustic volumeter with the weight exchanging system enables to perform fully-automated volume measurements. The reliability of the automated acoustic volumeter is experimentally examined, and the measurement uncertainty of the volume of the small mass weights is evaluated. Combined standard uncertainty is estimated to be 0.0021 cm 3 in case of volume measurement of a 100 g weight, whose nominal volume is 12.5 cm 3. It is confirmed that the automated acoustic volumeter can be applied to volume measurements of small weights with sufficient accuracy for the OIML class E 1. Keywords: acoustic volumeter, weight, volume, automated measurement 1. Introduction In mass comparisons of weights in air, it is essential to consider the effect of the air buoyancy, according to required accuracy. This correction for the air buoyancy is obtained from the volume of a weight and the density of air, and the former must be measured with a required uncertainty before the mass comparison. When the conventional mass of a 50 g weight of the highest class E 1 is to be calibrated with an expanded uncertainty of 0.01 mg, for example, referring to the OIML International recommendation R111 [1], it is necessary to measure its volume of about 6.25 cm 3 with an expanded uncertainty of 0.02 cm 3 or less. The volume of weights has been generally measured by the hydraulic weighing method, in which the Archimedes principle is applied to measure the water buoyancy for the weight and then its volume. In the hydraulic weighing method, however, weights to be measured are immersed in water, so that the problem of water adsorption or any contamination on the surface of weights arises, resulting in any change of the mass of weights. A series of these measurements for the hydraulic weighing method as well as for confirming the mass stability of weights needs time-consuming works. To solve these problems, a measuring method of the weight volume using an acoustic volumeter was developed by the National Metrology Institute of Japan(NMIJ), AIST and Measurement Science Laboratory Ltd. [2]. This technique realizes a comparison

measurement of the volume of weights in the air, with ease and in a short time. In order to improve the efficiency of the volume measurement using the acoustic volumeter, a weight exchanging system for the acoustic volumeter has been developed for the volume measurements of weights ranging from 1 g to 100 g. The weight exchanging system consists of a manipulator of three-axis motion, a control unit, a container lifting mechanism, and a stationary weight magazine with 30 weights positions. The acoustic volumeter with the weight exchanging system enables to perform fully-automated volume measurements. This paper describes features of the automated system, and experimental results of performance test using the automated acoustic volumeter. It allows measuring the volume of the OIML class E 1 weights from 1 g to 100 g with the uncertainty required for these weights. A set of volume reference weights with known volumes is prepared for the comparison measurement. The reliability of the volume measurement of the small mass weights using automated acoustic volumeter is experimentally examined, and the uncertainty of the volume measurement is evaluated. 2. Acoustic volumeter Figure 1 shows the schematic drawing of an acoustic volumeter, VM-300, manufactured by Measurement Science Laboratory Ltd. [2]. The upper part of the main body comprises a reference volume container and lower part, a measurement volume container, and both containers are made of aluminum alloy. Through a bypass tube, the static pressure and humidity of air in both containers are equalized. The loudspeaker located between the two containers is driven by a sinusoidal signal whose frequency can be varied by changing the computer program. The sound pressures of air in containers are respectively measured by two microphones. In the acoustic volumeter, an object to be measured is housed in the measurement volume container. The amplitude of the sound pressure generated by a loudspeaker varies due to a change in the inner air volume of the measurement container before and after its mounting. This amplitude change is measured, from which the volume of the object is to be known. From the output signals of two microphones, 1 and 2, connected to the respective containers for measuring the sound pressures, the ratio of amplitudes R is calculated as equation (1). E R = E 1 2 ( 1) Here, E 1 is the amplitude of output signal e 1 from microphone 1, and E 2 that of output signal e 2 from microphone 2. By using this ratio, the possible errors arising from any changes of the surrounding conditions can be compensated to obtain a higher accuracy of measurement. The details of the VM-300 are given in the paper [2].

Handle Main body Open Close Mic.1 - P 1 Mic.2 Loudspeaker P 2 e 1 e 2 Reference volume container Expansion board Bypass tube Measurement volume container Weight Guide bar Weight mount Cylindrical block Base Figure 1 Schematic drawing of the acoustic volumeter The measurement volume container can be selected from three containers of large, medium and small volumes, corresponding to the nominal values of weights to be measured. A small volume container for the small weights is used in this work. The operating parameters for VM-300, that is, gain 1, gain 2, driving frequency, sampling number and measuring period are taken as 30, 10, 60 Hz, 8192 and 20 seconds, respectively in the experiments. 2.1 Measuring equation There are two measuring methods of applying the acoustic volumeter: one is to use a reference weight with a known volume, and the other is to use two reference weights with known volumes [2]. In the present work, the latter method is adopted in order to realize a higher accuracy in the volume measurement. Supposing that a test weight of the OIML-recommended shape is compared with two reference weights having the OIML-shape, the volume of test weight V is obtained simply by the following equation. Here, V r1 and V r2 are the volumes of the reference weights 1 and 2 (V r1 < V r2 ) respectively, R r1 and R r2 are the amplitude ratios of the output signals from the two microphones for the reference weights respectively mounted in the measurement container, and R t is the one for the test weight mounted. As described, two reference weights and a test weight are set in the acoustic R R V = r2 r1 + R R r1 t ( V V ) V (2) r1 r2 r1 volumeter one by one, and the volume of the test weight is obtained from these three measurements of the amplitude ratio. The temperature correction for the volume is neglected here [2], since (a) the weights to be compared are all made of austenitic stainless steel, and (b) the temperatures of the weights are nearly equal to the room temperature.

2.2 Automated acoustic volumeter The block diagram of the automated system to measure the volume is shown in Figure 2 and its photograph in Figure 3. The acoustic volumeter with the weight exchanging system carries out fully-automated volume comparison measurements. The weight exchanging system consists of a stationary weight magazine, a manipulator, a container lifting mechanism, a control unit and a personal computer. The weight magazine has 30 positions for weights mass ranging from 1 g to 100 g. Test weights and the volume reference weights are placed on the stationary weight magazine. The manipulator of three-axis motion has travel ranges of 500 mm for X-direction, 200 mm for Y-direction and 30 mm for Z-direction, respectively and a positioning accuracy of ±0.02 mm, and sets a measuring weight on the mount of the acoustic volumeter. The container lifting mechanism enables the acoustic volumeter to realize an airtight condition in the measurement volume container by using an air cylinder with flow control valve. The control unit is capable of handling the weight safety by controlling the three-axis positions and the monition speed of the manipulator, and monitoring the vertical position of the acoustic volumeter. The acoustic volumeter and the control unit are operated from the personal computer. The system carries out the volume comparisons according to the procedure programmed in the personal computer, and results of measurements are recorded in the computer. Position Speed Control unit USB X Y Z Manipulator Setting Top Bottom Lifting mechanism Open Personal computer Weight magazine 30 positions Close Acoustic volumeter e 1 e 2 Hz Figure 2 Block diagram of the automated system

Acoustic volumeter 20 g 100 g Weight magazine Manipulator Mount 3. Volume reference weights Figure 3 Photograph of the automated system The acoustic volumeter is a volume comparator, which needs a reference weight with a known volume. A set of weights named v series has been manufactured in the mass range of 1 g to 100 g, as a reference of volume for the acoustic volumeter. As for the weights from 1 g to 100 g, three weights were prepared for each nominal mass values and marked as v1, v2 and v3 for identification, respectively. Their volumes are 95 %, 100 % and 105 % of the nominal values calculated by (nominal mass [g] / 8.0 [g/cm 3 ]), for v1, v2 and v3, respectively. The shape of these weights is the OIML-type, and their volume differences of ±5 % are realized by altering the heights in the cylindrical part of the weights, keeping the original dimensions of their knobs. The v series weights made of austenitic stainless steel, and consist of a single piece without any adjusting cavity. The volumes of these 21 weights in total from 1 g to 100 g have been measured by the hydrostatic weighing method. They are exclusively used as the reference standards for the comparison measurement by means of the acoustic volumeter. 3. 1 Hydrostatic weighing measurement The measured results of the volumes V 20 at 20 C of the v series weights made by the hydraulic weighing method are given in Table 1, along with their expanded uncertainties (k=2). An electronic balance with a maximum capacity of 111 g and a readability of 0.001 mg is used. A weight holder of the balance is suspended in a water bath. This weight holder has an upper pan in air and a lower pan in water, and a substitution weighing method is realized by using these two pans. The weight holder is in contact with the interface between air and water at its two stainless-steel wires of 0.5 mm in diameter. The effect by the surface tension of water acting to these wires is compensated by the substitution weighing method. In water, a measured weight is loaded or unloaded on the lower pan using a pair of laboratory forceps. This forceps is kept in a same posture in water, even when it is not in use, and any change in the water level is

minimized during a weighing cycle. The water bath is made of Pyrex glass, has a rectangular shape of 160 mm in width, 110 mm in depth and 50 mm in height. Any air bubble which might attach to the weight in water can be detected through transparent walls of the bath. Ultra pure water whose specific resistance is above 18 MΩ cm is used in the bath. The temperature of the water has been measured by a 100-Ω platinum resistance thermometer with a readability of 0.01 C. The density of the water is determined with a temperature correction by the Chappuis equation [3]. Nominal mass Marking V 20 ± U 95 / cm 3 100 g v1 11.9407 ± 0.0031 100 g v2 12.5695 ± 0.0031 100 g v3 13.1975 ± 0.0031 50 g v1 5.96482 ± 0.00053 50 g v2 6.27835 ± 0.00053 50 g v3 6.59183 ± 0.00053 20 g v1 2.38654 ± 0.00043 20 g v2 2.51183 ± 0.00043 20 g v3 2.63720 ± 0.00043 10 g v1 1.19391 ± 0.00043 10 g v2 1.25627 ± 0.00043 10 g v3 1.31878 ± 0.00043 5 g v1 0.59664 ± 0.00042 5 g v2 0.62803 ± 0.00042 5 g v3 0.65941 ± 0.00042 2 g v1 0.23867 ± 0.00016 2 g v2 0.25119 ± 0.00016 2 g v3 0.26373 ± 0.00016 1 g v1 0.11927 ± 0.00011 1 g v2 0.12558 ± 0.00011 1 g v3 0.13186 ± 0.00011 Table 1: Measured volumes of reference weights (VH) 4. Volume measurement by using the acoustic volumeter Using the acoustic volumeter and the volume reference weights, the volumes of weights from 1 g to 100 g have been measured to evaluate its reliability. With the reference weights, v1 of 95 % and v3 of 105 % respectively of the nominal volume, calibrated by the hydraulic weighing method, the volumes of test weights V1(not the same set as v1) and v2, with known volumes are measured. The result V A obtained by the acoustic volumeter is compared with the volume V H measured by the hydraulic weighing method to confirm their compatibility. 25 measurements are replicated for the two test weights respectively at the mass range from 1 g to 100 g. As seen in eq. (2), two reference weights and a test weight are alternatively mounted in the measurement volume container, and the volume of the test weight is then

calculated from three amplitude ratios, R r1, R r2 and R t, measured for these three weights and the volumes of the reference weights. In these first measurements, a set of measurement results of the amplitude ratios in the order of R r1 - R t - R r2 is obtained, and they are repeated three times. The mean of the three measured volumes calculated from each set of the results is taken as a measurement result of the volume V A. The results of measurements for 2 g weights and 50 g weights are shown in Figure 4. In the figure, the deviation of V A from the volume V H obtained by the hydraulic weighing method, (V A -V H ), is shown with its standard deviation. Among the 50 measurement results for two 50 g weights, the standard deviation of individual measurement is uniform and 0.0033 cm 3 at the largest, whereas for the 2 g weight, it varies irregularly from the minimum of 0.0006 cm 3 to the maximum of 0.0093 cm 3. This dispersion of the individual standard deviations is also observed with the same tendency, in both results for the 1 g and 5 g weights. 0.02 2 g s ( ) :0.0029 cm 3 0.02 50 g s ( ) :0.0010 cm 3 ( V A-V H ) /cm 3. 0.01 0.00-0.01-0.02 V1 v2 0 5 10 15 20 25 Number of measurements ( V A-V H ) /cm 3. 0.01 0.00-0.01-0.02 V1 v2 0 5 10 15 20 25 Number of measurements Figure 4. Deviations of measured values VA from the reference volume VH In Table 2, the means of the volume deviations (V A -V H ) and their standard deviations s ( ) calculated from the 50 results for each nominal masse are given. For all the weights from 1 g to 100 g, the means of the volume deviations are smaller than their standard deviations, and it is concluded that there is no significance in volume deviations. Namely, the results of the volume measurements by the acoustic volumeter are confirmed to be compatible with those determined by the hydraulic weighing method. Nominal mass / g ( V A -V H ) / cm 3 1 2 5 10 20 50 100 Mean value -0.0009-0.0013-0.0013-0.0012 0.0007 0.0007 0.0002 Standard deviation [ s ( ) ] 0.0029 0.0029 0.0033 0.0036 0.0013 0.0010 0.0031 Table 2. Mean values and standard deviations of ( VA-VH ) calculated from the 50 results

5. Uncertainty of the volume measurement by the acoustic volumeter Taking account of the measurement results described in the preceding section, the number of measurements to be needed for the volume measurement of a class E 1 weight is examined, and the uncertainty in that case is evaluated. With the acoustic volumeter, the volume of a weight is determined according to the equation (2), in which only three kinds of the amplitude ratio R are parameters to yield random variations. The term including the related amplitude ratios is therefore defined as R x, given by eq. (3). The uncertainty of determining the defined amplitude ratio R x in the n replicated measurements is then given by eq. (4), being derived from the standard deviation s ( ) shown in Table 2 and sensitivity coefficient C Rx shown in Table 3. R x = R R r1 r1 R R t r2 (3), u ( R x ) = n C As a result, the combined standard uncertainty of the volume measurement for a 100 g weight is evaluated from the above uncertainty u (Rx) and the uncertainties of the two reference volumes, u (Vr1) and u (Vr2), as shown in Table 3. The number of replicated measurements (n = 3), the degree of freedom for R x being 2 (= n - 1), is chosen so as to meet the requirement for the expanded uncertainty in the volume measurement of a class E 1 100 g weight. Here, the standard uncertainty due to the resolution of the acoustic volumeter is estimated to be zero. Since there is no significance in volume deviations (V A -V H ), the standard uncertainty arising from non-linearity of the volumeter is regarded as negligible. s ( ) Rx (4) Source Typical value Uncertainty Probability Divisor Sensitivity Uncertainty x i u (x i) distribution coefficient C i in V A u i V r1 11.9407 cm 3 0.0031 normal 2 5.0E-01 0.00077 V r2 13.1975 cm 3 0.0031 normal 2 5.0E-01 0.00078 R x 0.50012 0.0014 normal 1 1.26E+00 0.00178 V A : 12.5693 cm 3 u c 0.00209 Table 3: Uncertainty evaluation of the volume measurement for a 100 g weight (VA) The combined standard uncertainties for all the weights up to 100 g are similarly evaluated and their results are given in Table 4. The coverage factor k p which gives a confidence interval of 95 % determined from the effective degree of freedom is also given in the table. The expanded uncertainty is then calculated by multiplying the coverage factor by the combined standard uncertainty. As the result, the five replicated measurements for the weights of 1 g to 5 g and the three replicated measurements for the weights of 10 g to 100 g allow to satisfy the requirements for the OIML class E 1 weights.

Nominal mass / g 1 2 5 10 20 50 100 Number of measurements 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 Combined standard uncertainty /cm 3 0.0017 0.0017 0.0019 0.0021 0.0008 0.0006 0.0021 Coverage factor [k p ] 2.87 2.87 2.87 4.53 4.53 4.53 4.53 Expanded uncertainty [95%] /cm 3 Uncertainty required for class E 1 weight /cm 3 0.0048 0.0049 0.005 0.010 0.004 0.003 0.009 0.0066 0.0083 0.010 0.014 0.017 0.021 0.035 Table 4: Uncertainties of the volume measurement using the acoustic volumeter [cm3] 6. Summary The weight exchanging system for weights ranging from 1 g to 100 g has been developed to improve the efficiency of the volume measurement using the acoustic volumeter. To meet the technical requirements for the highest class E 1 weights of the OIML-type, the automated acoustic volumeter has been applied to the volume measurement of those from 1 g to 100 g. For the comparison measurements, the reference weights which have the volumes of 95 %, 100 % and 105 % of the respective nominal ones have been prepared for the exclusive use, and their volumes have been measured with an expanded uncertainty better than 0.0031 cm 3 by the hydraulic weighing method. Referring to these volumes, the 50 replicated measurements by the acoustic volumeter have been carried out. No significant difference has been observed between these measured results and those by the hydraulic weighing method and the differences are within the standard deviation of 0.0036 cm 3 or less. It is recommended that the number of the replicated measurements should be taken as 5 for the weights of 1 g to 5 g and as 3 for the weights of 10 g to 100 g, when the automated acoustic volumeter is used for the volume measurement of the OIML class E 1 weights. References [1] Weights of classes E 1, E 2, F 1, F 2, M 1, M 1-2, M 2, M 2-3, and M 3, OIML regulation R111, edition 2004 (E) [2] T. Kobata, et al., Measurement of the volume of weights using an acoustic volumeter and the reliability of such measurement, Metrologia 41(2004) pp75-83. [3] M.Tanaka, et al., Recommended table for the density of water between 0 C and 40 C based on recent experimental reports, Metrologia 38(2001) pp301-309.