WOLF CREEK GARRARD DITCH DIVESION GRINNELL DITCH DIVERSION ON WOLF CREEK

Similar documents
Powder/Tongue River Basin Plan Irrigated Lands Mapping and Water Rights Data Task 2A. HKM Engineering Inc. and Lord Consulting, LLC

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA

March 31, Dear Ms. Shreve:

Illinois State Water Survey Division

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Hydrological Conditions Report For March 2016

Evapo-transpiration Losses Produced by Irrigation in the Snake River Basin, Idaho

3.0 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 5 High Plateau

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF SURFACE WATER RESOURCES - A STUDY FROM DEDURU OYA BASIN OF SRI LANKA

2. PHYSICAL SETTING FINAL GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 2.1 Topography. 2.2 Climate

The Colorado Drought of 2002 in Perspective

Missouri River Basin Water Management

GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

The Climate of Payne County

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Hydrological Conditions Report For April 2014

Lower Tuolumne River Accretion (La Grange to Modesto) Estimated daily flows ( ) for the Operations Model Don Pedro Project Relicensing

Promoting Rainwater Harvesting in Caribbean Small Island Developing States Water Availability Mapping for Grenada Preliminary findings

The Climate of Murray County

Streamflow, Sediment, and Nutrient Simulation of the Bitterroot Watershed using SWAT

HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES EVALUATIONS FOR SG. LUI WATERSHED

Low-flow Estimates for Cedar Creek at Galesburg, Illinois

Upper Missouri River Basin February 2018 Calendar Year Runoff Forecast February 6, 2018

Minnesota s Climatic Conditions, Outlook, and Impacts on Agriculture. Today. 1. The weather and climate of 2017 to date

Stream Discharge and the Water Budget

Weather History on the Bishop Paiute Reservation

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data

Science Standard 1: Students analyze monthly precipitation and temperature records, displayed in bar charts, collected in metric units (mm).

The Climate of Seminole County

Climate also has a large influence on how local ecosystems have evolved and how we interact with them.

The Climate of Kiowa County

The Climate of Marshall County

Albeni Falls Operations Meeting 2015

2015 Fall Conditions Report

The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 4 Northern Cascades

The Climate of Grady County

9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD

MARMOT CREEK BASIN: MANAGING FORESTS FOR WATER

Disentangling Impacts of Climate & Land Use Changes on the Quantity & Quality of River Flows in Southern Ontario

Fenhe (Fen He) Map of River. Table of Basic Data. China 10

Memo. I. Executive Summary. II. ALERT Data Source. III. General System-Wide Reporting Summary. Date: January 26, 2009 To: From: Subject:

The Colorado Drought : 2003: A Growing Concern. Roger Pielke, Sr. Colorado Climate Center.

The Climate of Bryan County

THE STATE OF SURFACE WATER GAUGING IN THE NAVAJO NATION

FORECAST-BASED OPERATIONS AT FOLSOM DAM AND LAKE

A Post Processing Tool to Assess Sediment and Nutrient Source Allocations from SWAT Simulations

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: APRIL 18, 2017 Steven A. Root, CCM, Chief Analytics Officer, Sr. VP,

A Report on a Statistical Model to Forecast Seasonal Inflows to Cowichan Lake

Attachment B to Technical Memorandum No.2. Operations Plan of Ross Valley Detention Basins

2001 ANNUAL REPORT on INTERBASIN TRANSFERS for RTP South and the Towns of Cary, Apex, and Morrisville

A Review of the 2007 Water Year in Colorado

Project No India Basin Shadow Study San Francisco, California, USA

2011 Flood: Technical Review of Lake Manitoba, Lake St. Martin and Assiniboine River Water Levels Summary

FINAL STREAM. Prepared For: Discharge. Draft Stream. Level Hay Street, Subiaco WA Indiana Street. Golden, CO USA

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

The Climate of Haskell County

Butte County Drought Task Force December 1, :00 AM noon 202 Mira Loma Drive, Tahoe Room Oroville, CA. Agenda

DROUGHT IN MAINLAND PORTUGAL

Plant Water Stress Frequency and Periodicity in Western North Dakota

The Climate of Texas County

Upper Missouri River Basin January 2018 Calendar Year Runoff Forecast January 3, 2018

Stormwater Guidelines and Case Studies. CAHILL ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants West Chester, PA (610)

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

The Climate of Pontotoc County

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

APPENDIX J MODELING TEHCNICAL MEMORANDUM (RESSIM MODELING)

ZUMWALT WEATHER AND CLIMATE ANNUAL REPORT ( )

Study of Hydrometeorology in a Hard Rock Terrain, Kadirischist Belt Area, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh

Champaign-Urbana 2000 Annual Weather Summary

2016 Meteorology Summary

Modeling the Effects of Climate and Land Cover Change in the Stoney Brook Subbasin of the St. Louis River Watershed

Webinar and Weekly Summary February 15th, 2011

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Lake Winnebago Regulation Meeting

Water Management for Environmental Restoration Flows In the Big Bend reach, Rio Grande Rio Bravo

Climatography of the United States No

Appendix C Surface Water and Groundwater Interaction Memorandum

APPLICATIONS OF DOWNSCALING: HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES EXAMPLES

Water Supply Conditions and Outlook June 4, 2018

2003 Moisture Outlook

Modeling of peak inflow dates for a snowmelt dominated basin Evan Heisman. CVEN 6833: Advanced Data Analysis Fall 2012 Prof. Balaji Rajagopalan

The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 3 Southwest Interior

Rainfall Observations in the Loxahatchee River Watershed


Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

Jackson County 2018 Weather Data 67 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

CoCoRaHS Monitoring Colorado s s Water Resources through Community Collaborations

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS International General Certificate of Secondary Education

Hydrogeology and Simulated Effects of Future Water Use and Drought in the North Fork Red River Alluvial Aquifer: Progress Report

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Midwest and Great Plains Climate and Drought Update

Appendix C. AMEC Evaluation of Zuni PPIW. Appendix C. Page C-1 of 34

Drought in Southeast Colorado

Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Joint Federal Project, Folsom Dam

Transcription:

WOLF CREEK GARRARD DITCH DIVESION GRINNELL DITCH DIVERSION ON WOLF CREEK

WOLF CREEK DRAINAGE INTRODUCTION BIG PICTURE Wolf Creek flows out of the east slope of the Bighorn Mountains, between the tributaries of the Big Goose and the Tongue before joining the Tongue in Ranchester. The Tongue flows east out of Ranchester until it turns northeast near Acme, Wyoming, to cross the Montana state line approximately seven miles. Once in Montana, the Tongue runs into the Tongue River Reservoir. Wolf Creek has no storage of any significance to draw upon. CHARACTERISTICS Wolf Creek works its way through a predominance of cobble and gravel bars from old river channels, driving up its instream losses. USAGE Wolf Creek s diversions are devoted almost entirely to agricultural irrigation. Regulation Water commissioners estimate that regulation is imposed on Clear Creek drainage diversions with the following timing: Agriculture Wet Yr. Avg. Yr. Dry Yr. None or last of August 2 nd week of July 1 st week of July Growers in the Wolf Creek drainage tend to devote approximately 45 percent of their lands to alfalfa, 35 percent to grass hay, 5 percent grain, and 15 percent corn. Typically, they rotate the alfalfa/grass crop with wheat or oats for a single year to replenish their soils. They tend to use 50 percent ditch-flood irrigation and 50 percent sprinkler irrigation. The typical irrigation season runs from April 15-May 1 (depending on whether the spring runoff is delayed by colder weather) to mid/early October (depending on when the first snows fall and the ground freezes). All of the irrigators using Wolf Creek practice post-season irrigation, using their full rights to do so. Double Appropriation Irrigation water rights with priority dates of March 1, 1945 or earlier are entitled to an additional 1cfs per 70 acres under Wyoming s surplus water statutes. Whenever the supply in a stream exceeds the amount required to satisfy all existing appropriations established prior to March 1, 1985, the stream is said to be in an excess flow condition and water right holders with priorities between March 2, 1945 and March 1, 1985 may use an additional 1 cfs for each 70 acres irrigated. In Wolf Creek, this practice is limited primarily by the condition of ditches. No diversions on Wolf Creek can divert more than their appropriation. Permitted Uses Permits granted for water appropriation are granted for specific uses. The following pages contain tables of permits and their associated uses. The following table provides a key to those uses: Powder/Tongue River Basin Irrigation Diversion Operation and Description Memo 100

Code Chem Com Cul D Drl Eng Fire Fish F.C. I Ind I.F. Mech Mfg Mil Use Chemical Commercial Culinary Domestic Drilling Steam Engines Fire Protection Fish Propogation Flood Control Irrigation Industrial Instream Flow Mechanical Manufacturing Milling Code Min Misc Mun Oil P.C. Power R.R. Rec Ref Res. Supply S T Use Mining Miscellaneous Municipal Oil Refining or Production Pollution Control Power Development Railroad Recreational Refining Supply Facility for a Reservoir Stock Transportation WATER RIGHTS Two water rights summary tables are provided for each diversion serving irrigation referenced here. The first, included in the body of the diversion synopsis, refers to the rights on record with the State Engineer s Office and is derived from that office s Tabulation of Adjudicated Surface Water Rights of the State of Wyoming, Water Division Number Two (Oct. 1999). Because this rights summary is pulled directly from the SEO Tab, the rights cited follow the SEO s priority order: Hierarchy Format of right Example 1 Day, Month, Year 05-15-1884 2 Month and Year 05-00-1884 3 Specified Season and Year Spring 1884 4 Year Only 1884 5 Before Year Before 1884 Board orders or court orders may also establish a specific priority. Irrigated Lands Water Rights Database The second table, which follows the diversion synopsis, is taken from the irrigated lands water rights database developed for the basin plan. It can be used as a reference with the following caveats: It only lists water rights associated with the irrigated lands polygons mapped by HKM. The table does not include nonirrigation rights devoted to reservoir supply, municipal, fish propagation, etc. The rights on this table are associated only with those irrigated lands identified through the course of this study, both actively irrigated and currently idle. Column Heading Key PerNo Permit Number Terr denotes a territorial right. PerSfx Permit Suffix D = direct flow E = enlargement R = reservoir Facility Name Parentheses denote the former means of conveyance for the water right. Powder/Tongue River Basin Irrigation Diversion Operation and Description Memo 101

Unit Flow or volume CFS = cubic feet per second AF = acre-feet GPM = gallons per minute SupTyp Supply Type OS = original supply SS = supplement supply, for lands having an original supply from another source Sec = secondary supply, for water stored in a reservoir Status Status of adjudication Adj = adjudicated Una = unadjudicated Source Source water Parentheses denote the permit number of the related storage right. Powder/Tongue River Basin Irrigation Diversion Operation and Description Memo 102

KEY DIVERSIONS Diversion: GARRARD DITCH DIVERSION Date: 12 Sep. 2000 Note: Diversion Description: Diversion Location: The Garrard has a right for more than 10 cfs; it diverts approximately half of that. Headgate consists of a single, 5.7 x 2-foot rectangular wooden gate in steel slider operated by a Waterman-type screw mounted in a concrete headwall. Garrard Ditch headgate The Garrard Ditch diversion is located on the main stem of Wolf Creek downstream from the community of Wolf. Headgate: Lat. Long. N 44 47' 22.9'' W 107 13' 6.2'' Conveyance Description: Direct Flow Water Rights: Associated Storage Rights: Agricultural Practices: Irrigation Practices: Return Flows: Open channel canal, approximately 2.3 mi. long with two siphons under creek crossings. A summary of the direct-flow rights on Wolf Creek follows: Permit Priority Date Permitted Acres Flow Cumulative Use (cfs) (cfs) Terr. 04-00-1883 I 750 10.71 10.71 7204E 11-05-1997 S 0.05 10.76 None See introduction to Wolf Creek drainage See introduction to Wolf Creek drainage Estimated percentage of total diversion developing into return flows: Destination Wet yr. Mid yr. Dry yr. Wolf Creek 10 7 5 Losses: References: Typical (10 percent) by the end of the ditch Pat Boyd, water commissioner, State Engineer s Office, interview, 12 Sept. 2000 Irrigated Lands Water Rights Database PerNo PerSfx Facility Name Priority Acres Amount Unit SupTyp Status Source Terr D Gerrard April 30, 1883 750 10.71 CFS OS Adj Wolf Creek Powder/Tongue River Basin Irrigation Diversion Operation and Description Memo 103

Name Garrard Ditch Diversion Source Wolf Creek District 5 Data Total monthly flow in AF Water Year Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Total 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 0.00 0.00 0.00 153.92 374.56 0.00 528.48 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 0.00 543.06 1034.82 1037.38 489.23 257.19 3361.68 1982 0.00 377.30 1006.81 817.81 484.09 269.32 2955.33 1983 0.00 0.00 0.00 476.96 448.89 238.13 1163.98 1984 0.00 323.52 572.01 596.23 515.90 117.44 2125.10 1985 0.00 314.94 578.65 524.42 399.40 59.45 1876.86 1986 0.00 387.28 611.49 508.38 266.52 209.26 1982.93 1987 0.00 320.53 580.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 901.49 1988 0.00 389.87 809.82 380.12 96.10 0.00 1675.91 1989 1990 0.00 238.65 285.98 553.69 302.05 186.74 1567.11 1991 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 192.84 60.13 252.97 1992 0.00 469.61 342.78 190.18 375.89 453.55 1832.01 1993 99.91 896.68 559.69 528.46 238.78 177.42 2500.94 1994 0.00 517.81 414.99 358.38 121.51 100.55 1513.24 1995 0.00 52.37 199.64 277.44 185.58 2.98 718.01 1996 0.00 0.00 184.31 148.63 33.71 25.54 392.19 1997 0.00 376.19 579.44 255.10 149.27 77.82 1437.82 1998 0.00 584.56 365.23 224.07 137.28 60.19 1371.33 1999 0.00 0.00 326.48 224.50 78.08 29.65 658.71 Mean 5.26 304.86 444.90 381.88 257.35 122.39 1516.64 Max 99.91 896.68 1034.82 1037.38 515.90 453.55 3361.68 Min 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 252.97 Notes: 1. Monthly data is derived from spot measurements in the Hydrographers' Annual Reports for years 1980 and later, and from WRDS for years prior to 1980 2. Zero flow is assumed prior to the first and after the last measurement Powder/Tongue River Basin Irrigation Diversion Operation and Description Memo 104

Name Source District Data Garrard Ditch Diversion Wolf Creek 5 First & Last Dates, Max. Days Water First Date of Last Date of Maximum Year Measurement Measurement Days Missing 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 24-Jul 31-Aug 0 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 9-May 21-Sep 24 1982 18-May 22-Sep 20 1983 7-Jul 23-Sep 13 1984 15-May 11-Sep 18 1985 15-May 10-Sep 17 1986 14-May 13-Sep 17 1987 16-May 29-Jun 13 1988 18-May 19-Aug 36 1989 1990 16-May 13-Sep 20 1991 12-Aug 12-Sep 8 1992 7-May 29-Sep 50 1993 22-Apr 29-Sep 21 1994 2-May 30-Sep 27 1995 24-May 1-Sep 29 1996 13-Jun 30-Sep 27 1997 8-May 26-Sep 8 1998 4-May 23-Sep 14 1999 4-Jun 10-Sep 12 Avg. 26-May 12-Sep 20 Earliest 22-Apr 29-Jun 0 Latest 12-Aug 30-Sep 50 Notes: 1. Data is from Hydrographers' Annual Reports for years 1980 and later, and from WRDS for years prior to 1980. Powder/Tongue River Basin Irrigation Diversion Operation and Description Memo 105

KEY DIVERSIONS Diversion: GRINNELL DITCH DIVERSION ON WOLF CREEK AKA: Grinnell Livestock Co (on Wolf Creek), Grinnell & Stewart Date: 12 Sep. 2000 Note: The Grinnell s direct-flow rights were transferred from Big Goose to the Wolf on 9/13/2000 to allow the owners to tap their supplementary rights in Big Goose Creek. Because of the fractured Grinnell Ditch headgate limestone and gravel in its path and the length and low slope of its channel, this ditch tends to have large instream losses. Water commissioners report that the condition of the headgate and rights have reduced the diversion to approximately 3 cfs. Diversion Description: Diversion Location: Headgate consists of a single, 4.5 x 3.5-foot rectangular steel gate in steel slider raised/lowered by a Waterman-type screw mounted in concrete headwall. The Grinnell Ditch diversion is located on the main stem of Wolf Creek just downstream from the community of Wolf. Headgate: Lat. Long. N 44 46' 24.4'' W 107 13' 55.5'' Conveyance Description: Direct Flow Water Rights: Associated Storage Rights: Agricultural Practices: Irrigation Practices: Return Flows: Open channel canal, approximately 4.8 mi. long A summary of the direct-flow rights on Wolf Creek follows: Permit Priority Date Permitted Use Acres Flow (cfs) Cumulative (cfs) Terr. 09-11-1884 I 1666 23.8 23.8 7182E 09-04-1996 I,Res Supply 427 6.1 29.9 See Note above on actual amount diverted. None See introduction to Wolf Creek drainage See introduction to Wolf Creek drainage Estimated percentage of total diversion developing into return flows: Destination Wet yr. Mid yr. Dry yr. Wolf Creek 20 15 10 Losses: Approximately 50 percent by the end of the ditch References: Pat Boyd, water commissioner, State Engineer s Office, interview, 12 Sept. 2000 Powder/Tongue River Basin Irrigation Diversion Operation and Description Memo 106

Irrigated Lands Water Rights Database PerNo PerSfx Facility Name Priority Acres Amount Unit SupTyp Status Source Terr D Grinnell Live Stock Co's Sep. 11, 1884 3000 42.86 CFS OS Adj Wolf Creek Terr D Grinnell Live Stock Co. Sep. 11, 1884 3000 42.86 CFS OS Adj Wolf Creek Terr D Stewart (Grinnell Live Stock Co.) Dec. 10, 1884 915 13.07 CFS OS Adj Wolf Creek Terr D Stewart (Grinnell Live Stock Co.) Dec. 10, 1884 915 13.07 CFS OS Adj Wolf Creek 275 E Enl. Stewart (Grinnell Live Stock Co.) May 28, 1897 104 1.48 CFS OS Adj Wolf Creek 7182 E Enl. Grinnell Livestock Company Sep. 4, 1996 427 6.1 CFS OS Adj Wolf Creek Powder/Tongue River Basin Irrigation Diversion Operation and Description Memo 107

Name Grinnell Ditch Diversion on Wolf Creek Source Wolf Creek District 5 Data Total monthly flow in AF Water Year Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Total 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 0.00 0.00 151.72 78.21 0.00 229.93 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 151.62 738.75 502.29 142.70 10.34 1545.70 1982 87.07 331.44 375.13 164.96 114.76 1073.36 1983 0.00 0.00 311.48 97.91 0.00 409.39 1984 0.00 120.20 267.61 100.49 42.00 530.30 1985 148.41 365.01 104.73 0.00 0.00 618.15 1986 292.59 420.59 265.93 12.56 0.00 991.67 1987 181.98 403.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 585.88 1988 316.26 609.17 99.65 0.00 0.00 1025.08 1989 1990 0.00 0.00 147.75 310.80 0.00 458.55 1991 1992 0.00 49.59 307.31 320.29 165.79 842.98 1993 635.21 780.44 679.00 682.02 46.61 2823.28 1994 319.88 1055.26 700.11 208.57 0.00 2283.82 1995 0.00 795.57 355.46 59.66 108.99 1319.68 1996 0.00 30.35 140.05 170.44 118.29 459.13 1997 369.40 676.71 214.25 0.00 0.00 1260.36 1998 541.88 920.65 872.22 845.16 170.49 3350.40 1999 0.00 728.33 371.66 233.30 32.13 1365.42 Mean 169.13 445.89 325.91 190.39 44.97 1176.28 Max 635.21 1055.26 872.22 845.16 170.49 3350.40 Min 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 229.93 Notes: 1. Monthly data is derived from spot measurements in the Hydrographers' Annual Reports for years 1980 and later, and from WRDS for years prior to 1980 2. Zero flow is assumed prior to the first and after the last measurement Powder/Tongue River Basin Irrigation Diversion Operation and Description Memo 108

Name Source District Data Grinnell Ditch Diversion on Wolf Creek Wolf Creek 5 First & Last Dates, Max. Days Water First Date of Last Date of Maximum Year Measurement Measurement Days Missing 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 3-Jul 31-Aug 0 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 25-May 2-Sep 24 1982 27-May 22-Sep 43 1983 7-Jul 17-Aug 13 1984 19-Jun 11-Sep 24 1985 22-May 15-Jul 12 1986 14-May 2-Aug 17 1987 16-May 29-Jun 13 1988 17-May 9-Jul 37 1989 1990 27-Jul 15-Aug 7 1991 1992 26-Jun 29-Sep 34 1993 10-May 8-Sep 24 1994 24-May 18-Aug 19 1995 1-Jun 29-Sep 38 1996 13-Jun 30-Sep 27 1997 15-May 14-Jul 7 1998 4-May 23-Sep 16 1999 4-Jun 10-Sep 10 Avg. 3-Jun 24-Aug 20 Earliest 4-May 29-Jun 0 Latest 27-Jul 30-Sep 43 Notes: 1. Data is from Hydrographers' Annual Reports for years 1980 and later, and from WRDS for years prior to 1980. Powder/Tongue River Basin Irrigation Diversion Operation and Description Memo 109