SDSS Data Management and Photometric Quality Assessment

Similar documents
The SDSS Data. Processing the Data

Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

Introduction to the Sloan Survey

Introduction to SDSS -instruments, survey strategy, etc

Searching for Needles in the Sloan Digital Haystack

Science Results Enabled by SDSS Astrometric Observations

The Sloan Digital Sky Survey

JINA Observations, Now and in the Near Future

The Dark Energy Survey Public Data Release 1

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

Lecture 11: SDSS Sources at Other Wavelengths: From X rays to radio. Astr 598: Astronomy with SDSS

Doing astronomy with SDSS from your armchair

Studying galaxies with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

VISTA HEMISPHERE SURVEY DATA RELEASE 1

Data Processing in DES

The SDSS is Two Surveys

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 7 Mar 2007

ROSAT Roentgen Satellite. Chandra X-ray Observatory

(Present and) Future Surveys for Metal-Poor Stars

Astr 323: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology. Spring Quarter 2014, University of Washington, Željko Ivezić. Lecture 1:

Astronomical image reduction using the Tractor

Data Release 5. Sky coverage of imaging data in the DR5

An end-to-end simulation framework for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Andrew Connolly University of Washington

A Random Walk Through Astrometry

LSST Science. Željko Ivezić, LSST Project Scientist University of Washington

SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY STANDARD STAR CATALOG FOR STRIPE 82: THE DAWN OF INDUSTRIAL 1% OPTICAL PHOTOMETRY

Flagging Bad Data in Imaging

Astr 511: Galactic Astronomy. Winter Quarter 2015, University of Washington, Željko Ivezić. Lecture 1:

Design and implementation of the spectra reduction and analysis software for LAMOST telescope

Department of Astrophysical Sciences Peyton Hall Princeton, New Jersey Telephone: (609)

Parametrization and Classification of 20 Billion LSST Objects: Lessons from SDSS

Data Management Plan Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 17 Jan 2007

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 9 May 2013

A Comparison of SDSS Standard Star Catalog for Stripe 82 with Stetson s Photometric Standards

Local Volume, Milky Way, Stars, Planets, Solar System: L3 Requirements

SDSS spectroscopic survey of stars

Surprise Detection in Multivariate Astronomical Data Kirk Borne George Mason University

GOODS/FORS2 Final Data Release: Version 3.0

Modern Image Processing Techniques in Astronomical Sky Surveys

A SPEctra Clustering Tool for the exploration of large spectroscopic surveys. Philipp Schalldach (HU Berlin & TLS Tautenburg, Germany)

Real Astronomy from Virtual Observatories

Image Processing in Astronomy: Current Practice & Challenges Going Forward

MULTIPLE EXPOSURES IN LARGE SURVEYS

Gaia Photometric Data Analysis Overview

The Two Micron All-Sky Survey: Removing the Infrared Foreground

Lab 7: The H-R Diagram of an Open Cluster

Reverberation Mapping in the Era of MOS and Time-Domain Surveys: from SDSS to MSE

Surprise Detection in Science Data Streams Kirk Borne Dept of Computational & Data Sciences George Mason University

Chapter 6: Transforming your data

Automated analysis: SDSS, BOSS, GIRAFFE

The SKYGRID Project A Calibration Star Catalog for New Sensors. Stephen A. Gregory Boeing LTS. Tamara E. Payne Boeing LTS. John L. Africano Boeing LTS

SkyMapper and the Southern Sky Survey

DRM Update Joe Liske

the open-source sky survey David W. Hogg (NYU)

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 24 May 2001

What shall we learn about the Milky Way using Gaia and LSST?

Separating Stars and Galaxies Based on Color

Large Imaging Surveys for Cosmology:

Quasar Candidate Selection by Clustering using Fibonacci Series for Astronomical Surveys

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 30 Aug 2001

WHEN THE. Pi on the Sky. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey. by HEIDI JO NEWBERG

Resolved Star Formation Surface Density and Stellar Mass Density of Galaxies in the Local Universe. Abstract

RLW paper titles:

AN IMPROVED PROPER-MOTION CATALOG COMBINING USNO-B AND THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY

LSST Pipelines and Data Products. Jim Bosch / LSST PST / January 30, 2018

LCO Global Telescope Network: Operations and policies for a time-domain facility. Todd Boroson

Promote AGASC 1.6 for use with OFLS 10.3 and SAUSAGE. Tom Aldcroft Brett Unks

Present and Future Large Optical Transient Surveys. Supernovae Rates and Expectations

Quasar Selection from Combined Radio and Optical Surveys using Neural Networks

Reduced data products in the ESO Phase 3 archive (Status: 02 August 2017)

Target Selection for future spectroscopic surveys (DESpec) Stephanie Jouvel, Filipe Abdalla, With DESpec target selection team.

(Slides for Tue start here.)

First results from the Stockholm VIMOS Supernova Survey

COLOR SEPARATION OF GALAXY TYPES IN THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY IMAGING DATA

Real-time Variability Studies with the NOAO Mosaic Imagers

AstroBITS: Open Cluster Project

APLUS: A Data Reduction Pipeline for HST/ACS and WFC3 Images

PHYS/ASTR 2060 Popular Observational Astronomy(3) Syllabus

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 31 Jul 2008

HETDEX Overview. Hobby Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment. HETDEX is: HETDEX enables a lot of ancillary science. HETDEX Science Workshop Feb 09

2-D Images in Astronomy

The SDSS, Databases and SQL Just another day in database land

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 3 Aug 2004

Fourteen-color Photometry of M13 and Ruprecht 8 using the Dichroic-Mirror Camera (DMC)

Basics of Photometry

A Calibration Method for Wide Field Multicolor. Photometric System 1

Detection of Polarization Effects in Gaia Data

New Opportunities in Petascale Astronomy. Robert J. Brunner University of Illinois

Halo Tidal Star Streams with DECAM. Brian Yanny Fermilab. DECam Community Workshop NOAO Tucson Aug

Apache Point Observatory

Theoretical quantities: blackbody radiation

Improving the Absolute Astrometry of HST Data with GSC-II

Larger Optics and Improved Calibration Techniques for Small Satellite Observations with the ERAU OSCOM System

The Plato Input Catalog (PIC)

Astronomy of the Next Decade: From Photons to Petabytes. R. Chris Smith AURA Observatory in Chile CTIO/Gemini/SOAR/LSST

Lecture 8. October 25, 2017 Lab 5

Intro to SQL. Two components. Data Definition Language (DDL): create table, etc. Data Manipulation Language (DML):

The J-PAS Survey. Silvia Bonoli

Classifying Galaxy Morphology using Machine Learning

Transcription:

SDSS Data Management and Photometric Quality Assessment Željko Ivezić Princeton University / University of Washington (and SDSS Collaboration) Thinkshop Robotic Astronomy, Potsdam, July 12-15, 2004 1

Outline 1. Overview of SDSS 2. SDSS Data Flow 3. Automated Data Quality Assessment 2

Overview of SDSS Imaging Survey 10,000 deg 2 (1/4 of the full sky), V < 22.5 100,000,000 stars and 100,000,000 galaxies 5 bands (ugriz: UV-IR), 0.02 mag photometric accuracy < 0.1 arcsec astrometric accuracy 3

SDSS Telescope (2.5m) 4

5

Overview of SDSS Imaging Survey 10,000 deg 2 (1/4 of the full sky), V < 22.5 over 100,000,000 stars and 100,000,000 galaxies 5 bands (ugriz: UV-IR), 0.02 mag photometric accuracy < 0.1 arcsec astrometric accuracy Spectroscopic Survey 1,000,000 galaxies 100,000 quasars 100,000 stars 6

Overview of SDSS Imaging Survey and Spectroscopic Survey (about 2/3 finished) Sophisticated data acquisition, processing and distribution systems ( 1 million lines of code): Science Factory: over 1,000 papers based on SDSS data, or referring to SDSS, already published (in 5 years since the first light) SDSS-II: more emphasis on Galactic structure and time domain You can join, too! (for a small fee) 7

SDSS Data Flow 1. Data Acquisition at Apache Point Observatory Peak data rate: 20 GB/hr 2. DLTs mailed to Fermilab 3. Pipelines run in successive order: Serial Stamp Collecting (SSC) Pipeline (bookkeeping) Postage Stamp Pipeline (PSP) (flatfields, PSF, etc) astrom (astrometric calibration) Frames (with PSP, aka Photo) most complex nfcalib (photometric calibration) 8

4. Stuffing operational database, resolving. 5. Spectroscopic target pipelines 6. Plate drilling at the University of Washington 7. Spectroscopic Data Acquisition at APO 8. DLTs mailed to Fermilab 9. Spectroscopic processing (spectro2d and spectro1d) 10. Stuffing database 11. All data eventually loaded into Catalog Archive Server

Web Interfaces to SDSS DR2 (www.sdss.org) Catalog Archive Server (CAS): search tools for querying the imaging and spectro catalogs from SDSS. Spectro Query Server: search spectra by position, or by spectral or photometric parameters. Retrieve survey files. Imaging Query Server: search photometry catalog by position, or by photometric parameters. Retrieve survey files. SpecList: upload plate,mjd,fiber list as part of a SQL query Imaging cross-id: find SDSS neighbors for a list of positions Navigate, Finding charts, : Point and click on images, finding charts, etc. 9

Automated Data Quality Assessment The quality of data is of paramount importance for their scientific impact; e.g. should you trust SDSS photometry (both measurements and errors)? The quantitative data quality assessment is a difficult problem, and automated quantitative assessment is even harder SDSS automated quantitative data quality assessment: the matchqa and runqa pipelines 10

SDSS Automated Data Quality Assessment 1. matchqa pipeline: compares two observations of the same objects magnitudes (aperture, psf, model, fiber, Petrosian) positions shapes star/galaxy separation 11

12

SDSS Automated Data Quality Assessment 1. matchqa pipeline: compares two observations of the same objects 2. runqa pipeline: estimate data quality from single observations the quality of PSF photometry the photometric zeropoint errors 13

Point Spread Function Magnitudes The PSF flux is computed using the PSF as a weighting function: the PSF must be known exquisitely well for required photometric accuracy ( 0.01 mag) 14

SDSS Imaging Point Spread Function 15

Point Spread Function Modeling The PSF is determined heuristically using Karhunen-Loeve transform there is no assumption on the PSF functional form (e.g. Gaussians): a set of N stellar images is expressed as a linear combination of N eigenimages, and the first 3 terms are retained Typical variation in the effective width across a frame is 10%. Modeled by expanding eigencoefficients in terms of x a y b with a + b <= 2. Greatly improves photometric accuracy (rms from 0.05 mag to 0.02 mag, with better outlier behavior) Use the difference between the aperture and PSF magnitudes (for bright stars) to recognize bad PSF models 16

17

Photometric Calibration Imaging data are photometrically calibrated using a network of calibration stars obtained in 2 degree large patches by the Photometric Telescope Patches are separated by of order an hour of scanning time any changes in atmospheric transparency, or other conditions affecting the photometric sensitivity, may not be recognized on shorter timescales. Problem: a dense network of calibration stars across the sky, accurate to 0.01 mag, in five SDSS bands, which could be used for an independent verification of SDSS photometric calibration, does not yet exist. The position of the stellar locus in color-color diagrams is stable can be used to estimate errors in photometric zeropoints 18

19

2 14 1.5 1 0.5 P2 P1 16 18 0 20-0.5 0 1 2 22-0.4-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 14 20 16 15 18 10 20 5 22-0.2 0 0.2 0-0.1 0 0.1 20

21

u z g 22

Photometric Calibration The position of the stellar locus in color-color diagrams can be used to estimate errors in photometric zeropoints to <0.01 mag in patches as small 0.03 deg 2 The width of the stellar locus can be used to automatically recognize substandard photometry Typical errors for SDSS photometric zeropoints are 0.01 mag in g, r, and i, 0.02 mag in z, and 0.03 mag in u (upper limits!) 23

Conclusions SDSS a science factory sophisticated data acquisition, processing and distribution systems The tracking of the position and the width of the stellar locus in color-color diagrams offers a robust automated method, accurate to 0.01 mag, for estimating the photometric accuracy of optical surveys (at least for b > 10 ) SDSS provides encouragement that even more ambitious surveys, such as LSST (20 TB/night!), may also be successful endeavors. 24

Update on Large Synoptic Survey Telescope LSST: a deeper SDSS (V < 24 per epoch, V < 26 coadded), every 3 days, for 10 years! Celestial Cinematography We are incorporated! (Founding partners: NOAO, Research Corporation, University of Arizona, University of Washington) New institutions are joining: the DoE group (2 Gigapixel camera), NCSC, UC Davis, Harvard, Google,... Mirror (8.4m) contract signed with the University of Arizona Mirror Lab The first light in December of 2011 25