Comparison of Primary Doses Obtained in Three 6 MV Photon Beams Using a Small Attenuator

Similar documents
Measurements and comparisons for data of small beams of linear accelerators

Neutron source strength measurements for Varian, Siemens, Elekta, and General Electric linear accelerators

The EPOM shift of cylindrical ionization chambers - a status report Hui Khee Looe 1, Ndimofor Chofor 1, Dietrich Harder 2, Björn Poppe 1

Comparison between TG-51 and TRS-398: Electron Contamination Effect on Photon Beam Quality Specification.

Prompt gamma measurements for the verification of dose deposition in proton therapy. Contents. Two Proton Beam Facilities for Therapy and Research

TITLE: Air Kerma Primary Standard: Experimental and Simulation Studies on Cs-137

Volume 1 No. 4, October 2011 ISSN International Journal of Science and Technology IJST Journal. All rights reserved

Implementation of the IAEA-AAPM Code of Practice for the dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy

Quality-Assurance Check of Collimator and Phantom- Scatter Factors

Estimate of Photonuclear Reaction in a Medical Linear Accelerator Using a Water-Equivalent Phantom

Clinical Implementation of the IPEM 2003 Code of Practice for Electron Dosimetry

Monitor backscatter factors for the Varian 21EX and TrueBeam linear accelerators: measurements and Monte Carlo modelling.

Monte Carlo simulation with Geant4 for verification of rotational total skin electron therapy (TSET)

The Influence of Brass Compensator Thickness and Field Size on Neutron Contamination Spectrum in 18MV Elekta SL 75/25 Medical Linear Accelerator

Manipulation on charged particle beam for RT benefit.

Limitations and benchmarks of EGSnrc

8/2/2012 UPDATING TG-51. When will it end? Part 1 - photon addendum. What are these updates? Photons: Electrons: More widespread revision required

ABSORBED DOSE BEAM QUALITY FACTORS FOR CYLINDRICAL ION CHAMBERS: EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION AT 6 AND 15 MV PHOTON BEAMS

) for Varian TrueBeam high-dose-rate therapy beams

Small Field Dosimetric Measurements with TLD-100, Alanine, and Ionization Chambers

Electron therapy Class 2: Review questions

PRIMARY STANDARDS of AIR KERMA for 60 CO and X-RAYS & ABSORBED DOSE in PHOTON and ELECTRON BEAMS. Malcolm McEwen

Radiation protection issues in proton therapy

Design, construction and characterization of a portable irradiator to calibrate installed ambient dose equivalent monitors

Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beams

Reference Dosimetry for Megavoltage Therapy Beams: Electrons

Measurement of induced radioactivity in air and water for medical accelerators

Radiation Dosimetry. Electron interactions with matter. Important processes in radiotherapy. Contents. Alun Beddoe

Photon-beams monitor-unit calculations

Simulation Modeling in Dosimetry

Physics of Novel Radiation Modalities Particles and Isotopes. Todd Pawlicki, Ph.D. UC San Diego

COMPARISON OF ABSORBED DOSE TO AIR CALIBRATION FACTORS FOR A PARALLEL PLATE IONIZATION CHAMBER*

Evaluation of different methods for determining the magnitude of initial recombination in ionization chambers

A Measuring System with Recombination Chamber for Photoneutron Dosimetry at Medical Linear Accelerators

Georgia Institute of Technology. Radiation Detection & Protection (Day 3)

Monte Carlo commissioning of photon beams in medical LINACS using wide-field profiles in a water phantom

Medical Neutron Science

Neutron Sources in the Varian Clinac 2100~2300C Medical Accelerator Calculated by the EGS4 Code

STANDARD WATER PHANTOM BACKSCATTER FACTORS FOR MEDIUM ENERGY X-RAYS

Calculations of Photoneutrons from Varian Clinac Accelerators and Their Transmissions in Materials*

Sensitivity of megavoltage photon beam Monte Carlo simulations to electron beam and other parameters

4.1b - Cavity Theory Lecture 2 Peter R Al mond 2011 Overview of Lecture Exposure (W/e)air Exposure Exposure and and and Air Air Kerma

ESTIMATION OF 90 SCATTERING COEFFICIENT IN THE SHIELDING CALCULATION OF DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EQUIPMENT

Transport under magnetic fields with the EGSnrc simulation toolkit

Using Prompt gamma ray emission to address uncertainties in proton therapy

Response Characteristics of a Large-Area Ion Chamber with Various Radiotherapy Beams Makan Farrokhkish, B.Sc.

Determination of absorbed dose to water for 60Co by the scaling theorem. M. Boutillon and A.-M. Perroche (1)

A comparison of methods for monitoring photon beam energy constancy

RECOMBINATION PARAMETERS OF SOME FABRICATED IONIZATION CHAMBERS

PHYS 5020 Computation and Image Processing

Physics. Sunday, March 4, :30 a.m. 10:00 a.m.

N. E. Ipe*, K. E. Rosser, C. J. Moretti, J. W. Manning and M. J. Palmer

factors for NE2561 ionization chambers in 3 cm x 3 cm beams of 6 MV and 10 MV photons

Magnetic removal of electron contamination in radiotherapy x-ray beams

Neutron Fluence and Energy Spectra Around the Varian Clinac 2lOOC/23OOC Medical Accelerator

Equivalent Field Calculation to Irregular Symmetric and Asymmetric Photon Fields

NEUTRON SPECTROMETRY WITH BUBBLE DETECTORS

BEAMnrc: a code to simulate radiotherapy external beam sources

A Study on Effective Source-Skin Distance using Phantom in Electron Beam Therapy

NACP-02 perturbation correction factors for the NPL primary standard of absorbed dose to water in high energy electron beams

Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2007), Vol. 126, No. 1 4, pp Advance Access publication 11 May 2007

Radiation Quantities and Units

LECTURE 4 PRINCIPLE OF IMAGE FORMATION KAMARUL AMIN BIN ABDULLAH

8/4/2016. Determination of small field output factors, advantages and limitations of Monte Carlo simulations

Air Kerma Primary Standard: Experimental and. Simulation Studies on Cs-137. J. Cardoso, L. Santos, C. Oliveira

LET! (de / dx) 1 Gy= 1 J/kG 1Gy=100 rad. m(kg) dose rate

Determination of contributions of scatter and distance error to the source strength of 192 Ir HDR brachytherapy source

Indrin J. Chetty, AAPM 2006 Monte Carlo CE course

8/2/2012. Larry DeWerd has a partial interest in Standard Imaging

General characteristics of radiation dosimeters

1 Introduction. A Monte Carlo study

Time-resolved beam symmetry measurement for VMAT commissioning and quality assurance

Commissioning measurements for photon beam data on three TrueBeam linear accelerators, and comparison with Trilogy and Clinac 2100 linear accelerators

7. a XV-2 high spatial resolution lm detector (Kodak). Important parameters of these detectors are given in Table1. The ionization chambers and the di

In our recent paper [1], applicability of the self-activation of an NaI scintillator has been studied for the photo-neutron monitoring around

An introduction to IAEA TRS-483

Proton radiography with a range telescope and its use in proton therapy

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K1 of the air-kerma standards of the LNE-LNHB, France and the BIPM in 60 Co gamma radiation

M [scale units/s] of the system

The neutron dose equivalent evaluation and shielding at the maze entrance of a Varian Clinac 23EX treatment room

Investigation of the standard temperature- pressure correction factor at low x-ray energies

Shielding of Ionising Radiation with the Dosimetry & Shielding Module

NPL s progress towards absorbed dose standards for proton beams

Updating reference dosimetry a decade after TG-51

CHARACTERISTICS OF DEGRADED ELECTRON BEAMS PRODUCED BY NOVAC7 IORT ACCELERATOR

Calibration of an alanine/agarose gel

The volume effect of detectors in the dosimetry of small fields used in IMRT

Diamond detector in absorbed dose measurements in high-energy linear accelerator photon and electron beams

ASSESMENT OF UNCERTAINTIES IN A DAILY-CHECK BEAM ANALYZER. J. Melgar, C. Martín, C. Montes, F. Sáez, E. De Sena, P. Gómez

The effect of dose calculation uncertainty on the evaluation of radiotherapy plans

The Radiological Physics Center s standard dataset for small field size output factors

Physics of particles. H. Paganetti PhD Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School

IRPA 2 nd European Congress, Paris, May Session: RP in Medicine - Workers. Activation Products In Medical Linear Accelerators

Tutorial: simulating a rod pinch diode for pulsed radiography with Trak and GamBet

Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration

Ionizing Radiation Dosimetry and Medical Physics

Evaluation of Phantom Equivalent Materials in Polychromatic Diagnostic X-Ray Beam

Measurement of backscatter factor for kilovoltage x-ray beam using ionization chamber and Gafchromic XR-QA2 film

EDUCATION University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK PhD in Physics/ Medical Physics 2009

Chapter V: Cavity theories

Transcription:

Comparison of Primary Doses Obtained in Three 6 MV Photon Beams Using a Small Attenuator Christoph Trauernicht Groote Schuur Hospital & University of Cape Town

Method is based on: Background A method of measuring the primary dose component in high-energy photon beams Paul Nizin & Kenneth Kase Med. Phys. 15(5), Sep/Oct 1988 Determination of primary dose in Co-60 gamma beam using a small attenuator Paul Nizin & Kenneth Kase Med. Phys. 17(1), Jan/ Feb 1990

Total Dose = Primary + Scattered Components Primary dose obtained by extrapolation to zero field size problematic esp. for high energy beams Uncertainties in primary dose from 3% - 10% This method: no extrapolation necessary

Three Linear Accelerators Philips SL 75-5 Varian 2300 Clinac Siemens Mevatron KD2

(1) ; (2) Index i refers to CAX attenuator Properties of attenuator: (i) Perturbation of scatter dose negligible with attenuator in the beam (ii) radius of attenuator > lateral electron range

; (1) (2) Index i refers to CAX attenuator Properties of attenuator: (i) Perturbation of scatter dose negligible with attenuator in the beam (ii) radius of attenuator > lateral electron range For a specified depth d in a phantom, the ratio of the primary components is independent of field size, thus: (3) (4)

Determination of C D (d) where d refers to depth, h refers to the attenuator and Δ is a small thickness of phantom All these quantities are measurable under narrow-beam conditions Primary dose can be obtained by four measurements of ionization in narrow beam geometry and two measurements of dose in a large beam in a phantom

(4) Doses with and without attenuator in the beam at depth d in water Measurements at 2 cm intervals up to d = 15 cm

Dose: D T & D T i Measured at different depths in a water tank in a 10 cm X 10 cm field with a 0.016 cc PinPoint chamber or 0.0067cc mini ionisation chamber

- 1 cm & 2 cm thick lead attenuators - r = 1 cm each - Attenuator at least 20 cm above water surface

Measurement Setup Water Water Philips SL 75-5 Siemens Mevatron KD2 Varian 2300 Clinac Total Dose [Gy/100 MU] 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 cm Pb attenuator [Gy/100 MU] 0.528 0.528 0.515 2 cm Pb attenuator [Gy/100 MU] 0.309 0.302 0.309

C D 0.6 cc Farmer chamber

Philips SL75-5 Siemens Mevatron KD2 Varian 2300 Clinac

Relative Reading Results: Ionization Measurements, Normalized to 1 1.000 No Lead 0.800 1 cm Lead 2 cm Lead 0.600 0.400 0.200 Varian Clinac 2300 0.000 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 Height of Water Column [cm] - Large uncertainties when using sets of ionization measurements - Fit an exponential function through the points

Results: Philips SL 75-5 Siemens Mevatron KD2 Varian 2300 Clinac C D (1 cm Pb), using 1.5 cm and 2 cm depths C D (2 cm Pb), using 1.5 cm and 2 cm depths 2.042 2.014 2.078 3.765 3.864 3.951 The fractional uncertainty in each measurement was determined by taking 15 consecutive measurements and dividing the standard deviation by the mean.

Results: Primary Dose Philips SL 75-5 Siemens Mevatron KD2 Varian 2300 Clinac Primary Dose [Gy/100 MU] 1 cm Pb Attenuator 0.925 ± 4.5 % 0.938 ± 4.8 % 0.935 ± 3.3 % Primary Dose [Gy/100 MU] 2 cm Pb Attenuator 0.941 ± 4.8 % 0.942 ± 5.2 % 0.943 ± 3.5 %

Relative Dose Results for 1 cm Pb Attenuator 1.000 0.900 10 cm x 10 cm Field: 1 cm Lead Attenuator C D (d) C D 2.000 0.800 0.700 1.900 0.600 1.800 0.500 Total Dose 0.400 Primary Dose Dose with 1 cm Pb Attenuator Varian 2300 Clinac 0.300 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 Depth [cm] 1.700 1.600

Dose [Gy] / 100 MU Total and primary doses 1.000 0.900 0.800 0.700 0.600 Dt Dp - 1 cm Dp - 2 cm 0.500 0.400 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Depth in water [cm] Fit an exponential to the primary dose up to 15 cm depth to get the primary linear attenuation coefficient

Primary Linear Attenuation Coefficient Philips SL 75-5 Siemens Mevatron KD2 Varian 2300 Clinac μ (1 cm Pb) [cm -1 ] 0.0447 ± 0.0007 0.0436 ± 0.0008 0.0458 ± 0.0012 μ (2 cm Pb) [cm -1 ] 0.0444 ± 0.0006 0.0436 ± 0.0008 0.0458 ± 0.0008

Discussion: Primary Dose Primary Dose (this work) [Gy/100 MU] In use [Gy/100 MU] Monte Carlo (Rice & Chin, 1990) [Gy/100 MU] Philips SL 75-5 Siemens Mevatron KD2 Varian 2300 Clinac 0.925 & 0.941 0.938 & 0.942 0.935 & 0.943 0.935 0.935 0.926 0.928 ± 0.013

Discussion: Primary Linear Attenuation Coefficient Philips SL 75-5 Siemens Mevatron KD2 Varian 2300 Clinac μ (1 cm Pb) [cm -1 ] 0.0447 ± 0.0007 0.0436 ± 0.0008 0.0458 ± 0.0012 μ (2 cm Pb) [cm -1 ] 0.0444 ± 0.0006 0.0436 ± 0.0008 0.0458 ± 0.0008 Narrow Beam Attenuation Measurements [cm -1 ] Pistorius (1991) CAPDD Kerma Model [cm -1 ] TMR extrapolation to zero field size [cm -1 ] 0.0460 ± 0.0001 0.0477 ± 0.0003 0.0482 ± 0.0002 0.0445 ± 0.0001 0.0445 ± 0.0001 0.0457 ± 0.0001 0.0469 ± 0.0006 0.0465 ± 0.0001 0.0477 ± 0.0002

Conclusion: This method suggests a feasible way of measuring the primary dose component of the radiation dose, as well as obtaining a value for the primary linear attenuation coefficient.

References: -A method of measuring the primary dose component in high-energy photon beams Paul Nizin & Kenneth Kase, Med. Phys. 15(5), Sep/Oct 1988 -Determination of primary dose in Co-60 gamma beam using a small attenuator Paul Nizin & Kenneth Kase, Med. Phys. 17(1), Jan/ Feb 1990 -B Bjarngard & P Petti, Phys. Med. Biol. 33, 21 (1988) -P Kijewski et al., Med. Phys. 13, 74 (1986) -M Day, Br. J. Radiol. Suppl. 17, 131 (1983) -R Rice & L Chin, Phys. Med. Biol. 35, 3 (1990) -JR Taylor: An Introduction to Error Analysis (1982) - S Pistorius: PhD Thesis (1991)