This section identifies and profiles the hazards that could affect the state of Alaska.

Similar documents
5.2. IDENTIFICATION OF NATURAL HAZARDS OF CONCERN

IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

RISK ASSESSMENT COMMUNITY PROFILE NATURAL HAZARDS COMMUNITY RISK PROFILES. Page 13 of 524

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

4.1 Hazard Identification: Natural Hazards

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

Bossier Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. August 10, 2016 Bossier City, LA

3.1: Identifying Hazards. Introduction

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF NATURAL HAZARDS OF CONCERN

Also, when Cascade volcanoes do erupt, high-speed avalanches of pyroclastic flows

West Carroll Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. August 25, 2015 Oak Grove, LA

Volcanoes. Introduction

Assessing Hazards and Risk

Debris flow: categories, characteristics, hazard assessment, mitigation measures. Hariklia D. SKILODIMOU, George D. BATHRELLOS

Mass Wasting: The Work of Gravity

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION HANDBOOK Second Edition

STEUBEN COUNTY, NEW YORK. Hazard Analysis Report

Climate Change Adaptation

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES. Page

Assumption Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. September 1, 2015 Napoleonville, LA

Title: Concepts of Flood Risk

New A-Level Physical Geography

MULTI-HAZARD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DECISION MAKING

Volcanoes: Help or Hindrance?

West Baton Rouge Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. September 9, 2015 Port Allen, LA

Climate Change Adaptation

OIKOS > landslide > mechanism >predisposing causes

Why Are Communities at Risk from Coastal Hazards?

Flooding in Western North Carolina: Some Spatial, Hydrologic, and Seasonal Characteristics CAUTION!! Outline. Basic Flood Facts.

(version 3) I. HumAN -Environment Interaction

Catastrophic Events Impact on Ecosystems

Natural Disasters & Assessing Hazards and Risk. Natural Hazards and Natural Disasters

CLIMATE READY BOSTON. Climate Projections Consensus ADAPTED FROM THE BOSTON RESEARCH ADVISORY GROUP REPORT MAY 2016

Joseph E. Boxhorn, Ph.D., Senior Planner Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission #

Climate Change Impacts in Alaska: the Weather Perspective

A GEOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF MAJOR DISASTER DECLARATIONS ACROSS THE LOWER 48 STATES

Severe Weather Watches, Advisories & Warnings

Prepared By: John Blair Sean Donahue Celeste Hoffman Kimberly Klinkers Megan Slater

Need of Proper Development in Hilly Urban Areas to Avoid

Earth Boot Camp. 3.7B: Investigate rapid changes in Earth s surface such as volcanic eruptions, earthquakes and landslides.

5. MANY COASTAL COMMUNITIES AND FACILITIES WILL FACE INCREASING EXPOSURE TO STORMS.

Oregon APA Legal Issues Workshop December 7, Tricia Sears, DLCD With information from Bill Burns, DOGAMI

REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING IN SOUTH CENTRAL CONNECTICUT. Association of State Floodplain Managers Conference June 13, 2013 Hartford, CT

Special edition paper

They include earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, floods, landslides, and other processes and occurrences. They are included in the broader concept of.

b Blackwell Science Environmental Geology PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE

TILLAMOOK COUNTY HAZARD ANALYSIS

Joseph E. Boxhorn, Ph.D., Senior Planner Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission #

Programmatic Approaches to Assessing and Mitigating Risk to Pipelines from Natural Forces

Global Climate Change and the Implications for Oklahoma. Gary McManus Associate State Climatologist Oklahoma Climatological Survey

On Page 1, following Paragraph 2 of the Planning Participants subsection, insert the following: 2012 Committee members included:

MODELLING FROST RISK IN APPLE TREE, IRAN. Mohammad Rahimi

Chapter 2 Planet Earth

Report on Disaster statistics of Nepal

COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM

Workshop on Drought and Extreme Temperatures: Preparedness and Management for Sustainable Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery

GG101 Lecture 22: Mass Wasting. Soil, debris, sediment, and broken rock is called regolith.

Baldwin County, Alabama

DIPLOMA IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT. (Non-Semester) (With effect from the academic year )

Tectonic Processes and Hazards Enquiry Question 1: Why are some locations more at risk from tectonic hazards?

Physical Geography: Patterns, Processes, and Interactions, Grade 11, University/College Expectations

3/3/2013. The hydro cycle water returns from the sea. All "toilet to tap." Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e

This table connects the content provided by Education Perfect to the NSW Syllabus.

Beyond the Book. FOCUS Book

B.2 Sources for Hazard Identification, Profiling, and Ranking (Section 3) Overview of Sussex County s History of Hazards

Disciplinary Core List of Standards (NGSS) for 3-5 Earth Science Progression - 3-ESS2 Earth s Systems ESS2.D Weather and Climate -

HAZARD DESCRIPTION... 1 LOCATION... 1 EXTENT... 1 HISTORICAL OCCURRENCES...

Section 12. Winter Storms

GLOBAL WARMING: GLOBAL WARMING. landscape implications. Andrew Goudie St Cross College Oxford

Erupted and killed approximately 15,000 people 200 years ago

World Geography Chapter 3

Unsafe Ground: Landslides and Other Mass Movements

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS (HIVA) Walla Walla County, Washington VOLCANO ASH FALL

Hydrology and Hydraulics Design Report. Background Summary

Miami-Dade College. The student will demonstrate a basic knowledge of the origin and evolution of the Earth and its planetary environment.

1 City of Edmonton Quesnell Bridge, Roads and Associated Structures Assessment

Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

PROF. DR HAB. PIOTR TRYJANOWSKI

1. TEACHER COPY- Return this at the end of class! 2. ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS ON A SEPARATE SHEET OF PAPER 3. WRITE THE QUESTION AND ANSWER!

The Importance of Mass Wasting

Interpretive Map Series 24

Geography Class XI Fundamentals of Physical Geography Section A Total Periods : 140 Total Marks : 70. Periods Topic Subject Matter Geographical Skills

Jeopardy. Final Jeopardy $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $300 $300 $300 $300 $400 $400 $400 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500

3 Erosion and Deposition by Ice

3l NATURAL HAZARDS AND UNSTABLE GROUND

AN APPROACH TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF SLOPE MOVEMENTS

PERIGLACIAL PROCESSES & LANDFORMS

SIO15 Midterm 1, Monday Oct. 30, 2017 TEST VARIATION: 2

( Your responses must be complete, using terminology and concepts.

9/13/2011 CHAPTER 9 AND SUBSIDENCE. Case History: La Conchita Landslide. Introduction

California OES Weather Threat Briefing

Global Climate Change and the Implications for Oklahoma. Gary McManus Associate State Climatologist Oklahoma Climatological Survey

GIS as a tool in flood management

hydrosphere notes nwebsite.notebook November 30, 2015 The Hydrosphere

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

3.12 Geology and Topography Affected Environment

Gateway Trail Project

FLOODING. Flood any relatively high stream flow overtopping the natural or artificial banks in a water system.

Transcription:

5. This section identifies and profiles the hazards that could affect the state of Alaska. 5.1. OVERVIEW A hazard analysis includes identifying, screening, and profiling each hazard. Hazard identification includes recognizing the natural events that threaten an area. Natural hazards result from unexpected or uncontrollable natural events of sufficient magnitude. Even though a particular hazard may not have occurred in recent history, all natural hazards that may potentially affect Alaska were considered. Those hazards that are unlikely to occur or for which the State has determined as having a very low risk were eliminated from consideration. The planning team decided to relocate Dam Failure and Public Health Hazards out of the Natural Hazard category into SHMP Annex 12. These hazards will no longer be addressed during future SHMP updates. Additionally, the legacy SHMP s economic, hazardous materials, and terrorism-related hazards are beyond the scope of this plan. These hazards are controlled by regulatory agencies and will no longer be addressed during this or future SHMP updates. 5.2. HAZARD PROFILES Hazard profiling requires research to determine the hazard type or characteristics, history, magnitude, frequency, location, extent, and likelihood. The State identifies hazards through historical and community anecdotal information, and by reviewing pertinent plans and scientific studies. Hazard mapping determines geographic extent and proximity to populated areas. A natural phenomenon, such as a volcanic eruption, is only considered a hazard when people and property are potentially affected. Risk, is the likelihood of harm resulting from a hazard. All natural hazards posing a risk to the state are considered, and those found to have minimal risk are eliminated from consideration. 5.3. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT DMA 2000 Requirements STANDARD STATE. Hazard Identification S3. Does the risk assessment include an overview of the type and location of all natural hazards that can affect the state? [44 CFR 201.4(c)(2)(i)] S4. Does the risk assessment provide an overview of the probabilities of future hazard events? [44 CFR 201.4(c)(2)(i)] Source: FEMA, March 2015. Hazard identification and risk assessment is the first step of the hazard analysis. The DHS&EM administration organized a project kick-off meeting with AECOM on November 20, 2017. Meeting participants discussed Request for Proposal (RFP) project deliverable requirements, project proposal documents, and DHS&EM management, project staffing, and primary project contacts. Travel expectations, reporting procedures, and invoicing requirements were also discussed. 5-1

AECOM reviewed the legacy 2013 SHMP to determine Alaska s identified statewide hazards. Next, AECOM evaluated and screened the comprehensive list of additional hazards based on a range of factors, including prior knowledge or perception of a hazard s threat along with the relative risk presented by each hazard, the ability to mitigate the hazard, and the known or expected information availability as listed in Table 5-1. The planning team determined that there are eight natural hazards that potentially threaten Alaska: cryosphere, earthquake, flood, ground failure, tsunami, volcano, weather, and wildland fire; some of which are influenced by increasing changing climate conditions such as late ice formation, early thaw conditions, or inconsistent rain (described in Table 5-1). Hazard Type Natural Hazards Cryosphere Earthquake (EQ) Flood (FL) (Riverine, Coastal, Lake, other related flood types. Includes resultant erosive scour damages) Table 5-1 Should It Be Profiled? Hazard Identification and Screening Explanation There are many locations in Alaska where both surface and subsurface water is frozen year round. This includes sea ice, lake ice, river ice, snow cover, glaciers, ice caps, ice sheets, and frozen ground (such as permafrost). Alaska experiences over 100 earthquakes every day. Many located in remote unpopulated locations; some spanning very low to severe potential population impacts. Snowmelt run-off and rainfall flooding occur during spring thaw and the fall rainy season. Several minor flood events cause damage. Severe damages occur from major floods. Alaska experiences storm surge, coastal ice run-up, and coastal wind scour along the shoreline and riverine high water flow scour along the area s rivers, streams, and creek embankments as well as damages from coastal or riverine ice flows, wind, surface runoff, and boat traffic wakes. Ground Failure (GF) (Landslide/Debris Flow, Subsidence) Tsunami (TS) ( includes Seiche) Volcano (VO) (Volcanic Ashfall) Weather (WX) (Severe Cold, Drought, Rain, Snow, Wind, etc.) Wildland Fire (WF) (Tundra and Conflagration Fire) Ground failure occurs throughout Alaska from earthquakes, landslides, thawing permafrost, and ground subsidence. However, subsidence and permafrost degradation are the primary hazards causing houses to shift due to ground sinking and upheaval, and high ground water thawing the permafrost. This hazard has historically impacted Alaska s coastal community and infrastructure. Volcano-generated ash periodically impacts Alaska communities. Volcanic ash creates severe air, marine, and road transportation, disrupts utility operations, water quality, etc. Tephra can impact those communities closest to volcanoes. Severe weather impacts the entire state with climate change/global warming and changing El Niño/La Niña Southern Oscillation (ENSO) patterns generating increasingly severe weather events. Winter storms, heavy or freezing rain, thunderstorms and subsequent secondary hazards such as riverine or coastal storm surge floods, landslides, snow, wind, etc. discussions are included within this section. Alaska communities with surrounding forest and/or tundra areas become very dry in summer months with weather (such as drought and lightning) and human-caused incidents igniting dry vegetation in the adjacent area (burning trash outside their landfill s burn box, camp fires, etc.). Fire proximity could also create urban/ wildland fire interface challenges. 5-2

Hazard Type Table 5-1 Should It Be Profiled? Hazard Identification and Screening Explanation Other Hazards (Located in Appendix 12) Dam Failure (DF) No Legacy dam failure hazard profile information is now located in Appendix 12.2.1 but will no longer be updated in SHMPs. Public Health No Legacy public health hazard profile is now located in Appendix 12.2.2 but will no longer be updated in future SHMPs. The planning team chose hazards that occur most frequently, cause the most damage, and have the highest response and recovery costs. Examinations include several factors: Hazard characteristics (or hazard type) o Typical event characteristics o Potential climate change impacts are primarily discussed in the Weather hazard profile but are also identified where deemed appropriate within selected hazard profiles History (geologic as well as previous occurrences) Location Extent (breadth, magnitude, and severity) Impact (Section 5 provides general impacts associated with each hazard. Section 6 provides detailed impacts to Alaska s residents and critical facilities) Recurrence probability statement Table 5-2 provides an alphabetical sub-classification index to various Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Survey (DGGS) defined scientific hazard classifications. These classifications have been integrated with pertinent major hazard profile classes as listed in Table 5-1. Table 5-2 facilitates easy access to specific subsets within specified SHMP locations. 5-3

Section Five Hazard Analysis State of Alaska Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Table 5-2 DGGS Hazard Index SHMP Location (Section/Page) Hazard SHMP Location (Section/Page) Acidification 6-91, 95, 99 Lateral Spread 6-34, 66, 68 Alluvial Fan Flooding 6-43 Lava Flow 6-93 Aufeis Flooding or Icing 6-6, 6-48 Liquefaction 6-34 Ballistics 6-94 Local Tsunami 6-77 Block Slide 6-66, 67, 72 Loose Snow Avalanche 6-14 Climate Change 6-1, 19, 104, 111 Naled 6-48 Coastal Erosion 6-20, 49, 60 Overbank Flooding 6-43 Coastal Flooding 6-45, 62 Periglacial 6-5 Cornice Collapse 6-14 Permafrost 6-5, 19, 23 Cryosphere Hazards 6-3, 24 Pyroclastic Density Current 6-93 Debris Avalanche 6-66, 67, 88, 93 Rainfall-Runoff Flooding 6-43, 56 Debris Flow 66, 67, 72 Regional Tsunami 6-77 Directed Blast 6-88, 94 Retrogressive Thaw Slide 6-68 Distant Tsunami 6-77 Retrogressive Thaw Slump 6-68 Drifting Ice 6-13 Riverine Erosion 6-52, 60 Earthflow 6-66, 67 Riverine Flooding 6-43 Earthquake Rockfall 6-19, 66, 67, 93 6-27 Earthquake-induced or tectonic Tsunami 6-75 Rotational Landslide 6-66, 67 Earthquake-related Ground Failure 6-36, 6-72 Sea Ice 6-13 Erosion 6-2, 41, 72 Sea Level Rise 6-46 Flash Flooding 6-44 Seiche 6-34, 77, 81 Flooding 6-41 Slab Avalanche 6-15 Fluctuating Lake Levels 6-47 Slump 6-68 Frost Cracking 6-6 Slush Avalanche 6-15 Frost Heaving 6-6 Slush Ice 6-14 Frost Jacking 6-7 Snow Avalanche 6-14, 23, 25 Frozen Debris Lobes 6-69 Snowmelt Flooding 6-43, 56 Gelifluction 6-68 Soil Creep 6-66, 68 Glacial Calving 6-3 Solifluction 6-68 Glacial Lake Outburst Flooding 6-5, 21, 47 Storm Surge 6-45 Glacier Surge 6-5 Strong Ground Motion 6-33 Glaciers 6-3 Subsidence 6-33, 68 Ground Failure 6-21, 31, 65, 70 Surface Rupture 6-33 Ground Ice 6-5, 6, 8, 11 Thermokarst 6-7, 68 Grounded Floeberg 6-13, 14 Topple 6-66, 67 Groundwater Flooding 6-48 Translational Landslide 6-66, 67 Ice Collapse 6-3 Tsunami 6-34, 75 Ice Fall Avalanches 6-4 Uplift 6-33 Ice Jam Flooding 6-44 Usteq 6-8 Ice Overflow Flooding 6-48 Volcanic Ash Cloud 6-88 Ice Push 6-13 Volcanic Ash Fall 6-89 Iceberg 6-13 Volcanic Debris Avalanche 6-93 Icing or Aufeis 6-6, 48 Volcanic Gases 6-91 Ivu 6-2, 13, 25, 59-59 Volcanic Landslide 6-93 Lahar 6-67, 92, 93 Volcanic Rockfall 6-93 Landfast Ice Break-out 6-14 Volcanic Tsunami 6-94 Landslide 6-65, 93 Volcanoes 6-85 Landslide-generated Tsunami 6-31, 79, 82 Wind erosion 6-52 5-4

Each profiled hazard is assigned an impact (i.e. magnitude or severity) rating based on its individual characteristics. Recurrence probability is defined within each hazard profile (Section 6). Section 8.6 explains the SHMP s vulnerability assessment methodology along with detailed hazard risk analyses and associated vulnerability assessments. This analysis was completed using geographic information system (GIS) mapping tools to analyze, manage, and present spatial relational data. Tables 8-14 through 8-21 have Severity and Description columns, which designate infrastructure category s locational or situational likelihood. Tables 8-22 and 8-23 provide historical event data from DHS&EM s Disaster Cost Index (Appendix 13.18). Section 8.7 Exposure Analysis Narrative Summaries This section provides individual hazard narrative descriptions based on Tables 8-14 through Table 8-21 that are broken out by their respective severity and description column data. Note: Alaska s profiled hazards are presented throughout Sections 6. The presentation order does not signify their importance or risk level. 5-5

This page intentionally left blank 6