Lecture III. Five Lie Algebras

Similar documents
The algebra of cell-zeta values

Transcendental Numbers and Hopf Algebras

AN EXACT SEQUENCE FOR THE BROADHURST-KREIMER CONJECTURE

A manifestation of the Grothendieck-Teichmueller group in geometry

MULTIPLE ZETA VALUES AND GROTHENDIECK-TEICHMÜLLER GROUPS

Periods, Galois theory and particle physics

Galois groups with restricted ramification

13:00 13:50 poly-euler L

On the double shuffle Lie algebra structure: Ecalle s approach

ZETA ELEMENTS IN DEPTH 3 AND THE FUNDAMENTAL LIE ALGEBRA OF A PUNCTURED ELLIPTIC CURVE

Mixed Motives Associated to Classical Modular Forms

Motivic Periods, Coleman Functions, and the Unit Equation

What is the Langlands program all about?

An example of generalization of the Bernoulli numbers and polynomials to any dimension

Galois Theory of Several Variables

Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra

b. N/kerF = { {x x is an even number}, {x x is an odd number} } This will be the carrier set of the algebra.

Motivic Periods, Coleman Functions, and Diophantine Equations

Mahler s Polynomials and the Roots of Unity

LECTURE 2. Hilbert Symbols

Introduction to Mixed Modular Motives

Sample algebra qualifying exam

The algebra of multiple divisor functions and applications to multiple zeta values

A Generalization of Wilson s Theorem

Galois Theory TCU Graduate Student Seminar George Gilbert October 2015

Multizeta values for function fields: A survey

On the p-adic Beilinson conjecture for number fields

Solutions to Assignment 4

Multiple divisor functions, their algebraic structure and the relation to multiple zeta values

MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA

1. Introduction to commutative rings and fields

Artin-Schelter regular algebras and the Steenrod algebra

Simply connected gradings of complex matrix algebra

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 7 Feb 2011

On the renormalization problem of multiple zeta values

DERIVATIONS. Introduction to non-associative algebra. Playing havoc with the product rule? BERNARD RUSSO University of California, Irvine

Free Commutative Integro-differential Algebras

1. Introduction to commutative rings and fields

Odds and ends on equivariant cohomology and traces

Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley. GRADUATE PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION, Part A Spring Semester 2019

Graduate Preliminary Examination

MATH 403 MIDTERM ANSWERS WINTER 2007

On combinatorial zeta functions

Rota-Baxter Algebra I

ORAL QUALIFYING EXAM QUESTIONS. 1. Algebra

NOTES ON POLYNOMIAL REPRESENTATIONS OF GENERAL LINEAR GROUPS

Transcendence theory in positive characteristic

DO NOT USE WITHOUT PERMISSION

A Version of the Grothendieck Conjecture for p-adic Local Fields

Elliptic multiple zeta values

Ultraproducts of Finite Groups

Motives. Basic Notions seminar, Harvard University May 3, Marc Levine

MULTIZETA VALUES FOR F q [t], THEIR PERIOD INTERPRETATION AND RELATIONS BETWEEN THEM

FINITE GROUPS AND EQUATIONS OVER FINITE FIELDS A PROBLEM SET FOR ARIZONA WINTER SCHOOL 2016

THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY Faculty of Arts and Sciences FINAL EXAM - SPRING SESSION ADVANCED ALGEBRA II.

THE QUANTUM CONNECTION

Functions and Their Graphs

Rings. Chapter 1. Definition 1.2. A commutative ring R is a ring in which multiplication is commutative. That is, ab = ba for all a, b R.

Symmetries of rational functions arising in Ecalle s study of multiple zeta values

Equational Logic. Chapter Syntax Terms and Term Algebras

Generating series of multiple divisor sums and other interesting q-series

arxiv: v2 [math.nt] 20 Oct 2017

An introduction to. Profinite Grothendieck-Teichmüller theory. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts. November 5-9, Lecture 1B

`-modular Representations of Finite Reductive Groups

Example 2: Let R be any commutative ring with 1, fix a R, and let. I = ar = {ar : r R},

The BRST complex for a group action

Profinite Groups. Hendrik Lenstra. 1. Introduction

RINGS: SUMMARY OF MATERIAL

1. Group Theory Permutations.

NOTES ON MODULES AND ALGEBRAS

FORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS

Ph.D. Qualifying Examination in Algebra Department of Mathematics University of Louisville January 2018

Polynomial Hopf algebras in Algebra & Topology

Moreover this binary operation satisfies the following properties

Chapter 3. Rings. The basic commutative rings in mathematics are the integers Z, the. Examples

1 Notations and Statement of the Main Results

Elliptic Multiple Zeta Values

Lecture 2. (1) Every P L A (M) has a maximal element, (2) Every ascending chain of submodules stabilizes (ACC).

l-adic Representations

ALGEBRA I (LECTURE NOTES 2017/2018) LECTURE 9 - CYCLIC GROUPS AND EULER S FUNCTION

Notes on p-divisible Groups

The Major Problems in Group Representation Theory

Day 6: 6.4 Solving Polynomial Equations Warm Up: Factor. 1. x 2-2x x 2-9x x 2 + 6x + 5

Chapter 4 Vector Spaces And Modules

Rings If R is a commutative ring, a zero divisor is a nonzero element x such that xy = 0 for some nonzero element y R.

More Polynomial Equations Section 6.4

CHAPTER 10: POLYNOMIALS (DRAFT)

Sum Theorems for Multiple Zeta Values, Old and New. Michael E. Hoffman. Number Theory Talk Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik, Bonn 29 June 2016

Proof of a conjecture by Ðoković on the Poincaré series of the invariants of a binary form

Math 120 HW 9 Solutions

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 1.

( files chap2 to chap

LECTURE 10: REVIEW OF POWER SERIES. 1. Motivation

Twists and residual modular Galois representations

ζ(u) z du du Since γ does not pass through z, f is defined and continuous on [a, b]. Furthermore, for all t such that dζ

Quasi-reducible Polynomials

58 CHAPTER 2. COMPUTATIONAL METHODS

Sandpile Groups of Cubes

Modern Algebra Prof. Manindra Agrawal Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Transcription:

Lecture III Five Lie Algebras 35

Introduction The aim of this talk is to connect five different Lie algebras which arise naturally in different theories. Various conjectures, put together, state that they are all isomorphic. Given their different sources, this seems very deep and surprising. A free Lie algebra (Lie algebra of the fundamental group of the category of mixed Tate motives); the Deligne-Ihara Lie algebra defined from the action of G Q on F 2 ; the Lie algebra of new multizeta values the double shuffle Lie algebra (formal multizeta values); the Grothendieck-Teichmüller Lie algebra Let F be the free graded Lie algebra over Q generated by e i, i 3 odd, graded by giving weight i to e i. Then the Lie algebras listed above are connected by the following known maps: e i Soule i Q l (DI) l G Q ĜT F e i ζ(i) (NZ) Φ KZ grt (F NZ) dm The definitions The Deligne-Ihara Lie algebra. Let F (l) 2 (i) denote the i-th group in the descending central series of the pro-l completion F (l) 2 of F 2, defined by F (l) (l) 2 (1) = F 2, F (l) 2 (i + 1) = [F (l) 2, F (l) 2 (i)]. 36

Filter the absolute Galois group G Q by setting G (i) Q = Ker( G Q Out(F (l) (l) 2 /F 2 (i + 1))). Consider the associated graded object (DI) l = i 1 G (i) Q /G(i+1) Q G Q ). Then (DI) l is a Z l -Lie algebra (the Lie bracket is induced by the commutators in The new zeta Lie algebra. For all tuples of positive integers (k 1,..., k r ), define the multizeta value ζ(k 1,..., k r ) = n 1 n r 0 1 n k 1 1 nk r r. This converges if k 1 1. It is easy to see that a product of two multizeta values can be written as a linear combination of multizeta values. Thus, these real numbers generate an algebra over Q. The quotient of this algebra by ζ(2) and all products of multizeta values is the vector space of new multizeta values. The algebra itself is naturally graded by k 1 + + k r, as is the quotient vector space. It has conjectured to have a natural Lie coalgebra structure. The formal new multizeta Lie algebra. The multizeta values are known to satisfy two sets of fundamental quadratic relations coming from: (i) multiplying two multizeta values and re-expressing the product as a sum of multizeta values using the series definition as above. ζ(k 1,..., k r ) = n 1 n r 0 37 1 n k 1 1 nk r r

(ii) using the integral identities ζ(k 1,..., k r ) = 1 0 tn 0 t2 0 dt n t n dt n 1 t n 1 ɛ n 1 dt 2 t 2 ɛ 2 dt 1 t 1 1 where n = k 1 + + k r, all the ɛ i are equal to 0 or 1, and (0, ɛ n 1,..., ɛ 2, 1) = (0,..., 0, 1, 0,..., 0, 1,..., 0,..., 0, 1) k 1 1 k 2 1 k r 1 All other algebraic relations between multizeta values are conjectured to arise from these. Therefore, it is natural to define the formal multizeta algebra F Z to be generated by symbols Z(k 1,..., k r ) subject only to the fundamental quadratic relations above. Like the multizeta algebra itself, F Z can be quotiented by products, yielding a formal multizeta Lie algebra F NZ. This is known to be a Lie (co)algebra. Goncharov has given the Lie coproduct explicitly. The double shuffle algebra. An element P of the non-commutative polynomial ring Q x, y belongs to the free Lie algebra Lie[x, y] if and only if it is primitive for the standard coproduct : Q x, y Q x, y Q x, y is the standard coproduct defined by (x) = x 1 + 1 x, (y) = y 1 + 1 y, i.e. if and only if (P ) = P 1 + 1 P. This holds if and only if the coefficients (P w) of words w in P satisfy the shuffle relations: (P w) = 0. w sh(w 1,w 2 ) Let π y (P ) be the projection of P onto the words ending in y, and let P = ( 1) n 1 (P x n 1 y)y n + π y (P ). n n 1 38

This polynomial can be written in the variables y i = x i 1 y. Let : Q y 1, y 2,... Q y 1, y 2,... Q y 1, y 2,... be the coproduct defined by (y i ) = k+l=i y k y l. Then P is primitive for if and only if P satisfies the stuffle relations: ( P v) = 0, v st(v 1,v 2 ) where v 1 and v 2 (and the v) are words in the variables y i. Another formulation of the stuffle relations: Let P L[x, y] (so P satisfies the shuffle relations), and let P be defined as above. Set n ( 1) j 1 u n = j j=1 y i1... y ij, i 1 + +i j =n and let P u denote the same polynomial again, but written in terms of the u i. Then P L[x, y] is said to satisfy the stuffle relations if P u Lie[u 1, u 2,...]. Let dm denote the set of polynomials P satisfying the shuffle and stuffle relations. Goncharov and more recently Racinet have shown that the Poisson bracket makes this set into a Lie algebra, the double shuffle Lie algebra dm. The Poisson bracket is defined by f, g = [f, g] + D f (g) D g (f) where [f, g] is the Lie bracket in Lie[x, y] and D f is the derivation of Lie[x, y] associated to any f Lie[x, y] by D f (x) = 0, D f (y) = [y, f]. The Grothendieck-Teichmüller Lie algebra. This Lie algebra, defined by Ihara and also called the stable derivation algebra, is defined to be the set of elements f Lie[x, y] satisfying (I) f(x, y) + f(y, x) = 0 (II) f(x, y) + f(z, x) + f(y, z) = 0 where x + y + z = 0 (III) i Z/5Z f(x i,i+1, x i+1,i+2 ) = 0 39

where x 12, x 23, x 34, x 45, x 51 are the usual generators of the Lie algebra associated to Γ 0,5. Ihara showed that this set forms a Lie algebra under the Poisson bracket. The known maps between these Lie algebras are shown in the diagram preceding the definitions, coming from various different theories. Not one of them is yet known to be an isomorphism, yet all of them are conjectured to be. 40