Interference, Diffraction and Fourier Theory. ATI 2014 Lecture 02! Keller and Kenworthy

Similar documents
Lecture 9: Indirect Imaging 2. Two-Element Interferometer. Van Cittert-Zernike Theorem. Aperture Synthesis Imaging. Outline

Chapter 10. Interference of Light

Waves Part III Electromagnetic waves

Physics General Physics II. Electricity, Magnetism and Optics Lecture 20 Chapter Wave Optics. Fall 2015 Semester Prof.

Lecture 9: Introduction to Diffraction of Light

Lecture notes 5: Diffraction

Lecture 11: Introduction to diffraction of light

If the wavelength is larger than the aperture, the wave will spread out at a large angle. [Picture P445] . Distance l S

Interference by Wavefront Division

The science of light. P. Ewart

Physical Optics 2018 Dr. Muwafaq Fadhil Al-Mishlab Third lecture [ Huygens Principle, Interference of light]

The science of light. P. Ewart

Physics I : Oscillations and Waves Prof. S. Bharadwaj Department of Physics and Meteorology Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Chapter 9 Spatial Coherence

Week 7: Interference

SIMG Optics for Imaging Solutions to Final Exam

Introduction to Condensed Matter Physics

Electricity & Optics

PH 222-3A Spring 2010

Chapter 7. Interference of Light

Final examination. 3 hours (9am 12 noon) Total pages: 7 (seven) PLEASE DO NOT TURN OVER UNTIL EXAM STARTS PLEASE RETURN THIS BOOKLET

Optics.

Chapter 35. Interference

PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICAL OPTICS

WAVE OPTICS GENERAL. Fig.1a The electromagnetic spectrum

LC circuit: Energy stored. This lecture reviews some but not all of the material that will be on the final exam that covers in Chapters

Physics 116. Nov 3, Lecture 21 Wave optics. R. J. Wilkes 11/3/11 1

Typical anisotropies introduced by geometry (not everything is spherically symmetric) temperature gradients magnetic fields electrical fields

1. Waves and Particles 2. Interference of Waves 3. Wave Nature of Light

Chapter 5. Diffraction Part 2

2.71. Final examination. 3 hours (9am 12 noon) Total pages: 7 (seven) PLEASE DO NOT TURN OVER UNTIL EXAM STARTS PLEASE RETURN THIS BOOKLET

Nature of Light Part 2

Today. MIT 2.71/2.710 Optics 11/10/04 wk10-b-1

UNIT-5 EM WAVES UNIT-6 RAY OPTICS

DIFFRACTION PHYSICS THIRD REVISED EDITION JOHN M. COWLEY. Regents' Professor enzeritus Arizona State University

Chapter 6 SCALAR DIFFRACTION THEORY

Probing the orbital angular momentum of light with a multipoint interferometer

INTERFERENCE 1.1 NATURE OF LIGHT

Introduction to aberrations OPTI518 Lecture 5

Nature of diffraction. Diffraction

Optics. n n. sin c. sin

Plane waves and spatial frequency. A plane wave

Plane waves and spatial frequency. A plane wave

Lecture 19 Optical MEMS (1)

The Diffraction Grating

Some properties of waves: Huygens principle Superposition Coherence Interference Young s double-slit experiment Thin-film interference

PS210 - Optical Techniques. Section VI

Brewster Angle and Total Internal Reflection

High-Resolution. Transmission. Electron Microscopy

Lecture 4: Diffraction & Spectroscopy

5. LIGHT MICROSCOPY Abbe s theory of imaging

The Quantum Theory of Atoms and Molecules: Waves and Optics. Hilary Term Dr Grant Ritchie

Brewster Angle and Total Internal Reflection

TOPIC: LIGHT, ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES, 2D AND 3D WAVEFRONTS

PHY410 Optics Exam #3

Modern optics Lasers

Light matter interaction. Ground state spherical electron cloud. Excited state : 4 quantum numbers n principal (energy)

Light as a Transverse Wave.

Coherence. This is based on. Chapter 10. Statistical Optics, Fundamentals of Photonics Bahaa E. A. Saleh, Malvin Carl Teich. and

Lecture 16 February 25, 2016

1/d o +1/d i =1/f. Chapter 24 Wave Optics. The Lens Equation. Diffraction Interference Polarization. The Nature of Light

Design and Correction of optical Systems

B.Tech. First Semester Examination Physics-1 (PHY-101F)

Fourier Approach to Wave Propagation

So far, we have considered three basic classes of antennas electrically small, resonant

Phys 531 Lecture 27 6 December 2005

An Example of Telescope Resolution

Interference. Reminder: Exam 2 and Review quiz, more details on the course website

Einstein Classes, Unit No. 102, 103, Vardhman Ring Road Plaza, Vikas Puri Extn., Outer Ring Road New Delhi , Ph. : ,

Andy Buffler Department of Physics University of Cape Town

Lecture 7: Optical Spectroscopy. Astrophysical Spectroscopy. Broadband Filters. Fabry-Perot Filters. Interference Filters. Prism Spectrograph

1. In Young s double slit experiment, when the illumination is white light, the higherorder fringes are in color.

Adaptive Optics Lectures

Fourier Optics - Exam #1 Review

Light was recognised as a wave phenomenon well before its electromagnetic character became known.

The science of light. P. Ewart

Introduction to Interferometer and Coronagraph Imaging

PHYSICAL OPTICS. Ans: 1 Sol: The condition to form bright band at a point is to have a path difference of x = nλ From the given problem

Lecture 5: Polarization. Polarized Light in the Universe. Descriptions of Polarized Light. Polarizers. Retarders. Outline

PHYS 214 Exam Spring 2017 Midterm

Spectroscopic Instruments

Modeling Focused Beam Propagation in a Scattering Medium. Janaka Ranasinghesagara

The EYE. Physics 1502: Lecture 32 Today s Agenda. Lecture 4. Announcements: Optics. Midterm 2: graded after Thanks Giving

Light Propagation in Free Space

IO3. Modul Optics. Diffraction

Physical Optics. Lecture 7: Coherence Herbert Gross.

Waves Part 3B: Interference

Electromagnetic Waves Across Interfaces

REVISION: WAVES, SOUND & LIGHT 11 JUNE 2013

Notes on Huygens Principle 2000 Lawrence Rees

Modeling Focused Beam Propagation in scattering media. Janaka Ranasinghesagara, Ph.D.

Diffractive Optics. Professor 송석호, Physics Department (Room #36-401) , ,

A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 2. Aperture Synthesis

Downloaded from

2.2 Schrödinger s wave equation

Dept. of Physics, MIT Manipal 1

Lecture PowerPoints. Chapter 24 Physics: Principles with Applications, 7 th edition Giancoli

Design and Correction of Optical Systems

PH880 Topics in Physics

Numerical Generation of Double Star Images for Different Types of Telescopes

Transcription:

Interference, Diffraction and Fourier Theory ATI 2014 Lecture 02! Keller and Kenworthy

The three major branches of optics Geometrical Optics Light travels as straight rays Physical Optics Light can be described as a series of waves Diffraction, interference Quantum Optics Light can be described as discrete particles http://skullsinthestars.com/2007/08/31/optics-basics-the-three-major-branches-of-optical-science/

Solving Maxwell s Equations directly r ~ H r ~D = 4 1 c @ ~ D @t = 4 c ~ j Need to solve four coupled! differential equations together! with boundary conditions r E ~ + 1 @ B ~ = 0 c @t r ~B = 0 Numerically, require a 3D mesh! with sub-wavelength resolution!! Each point has a vector for! E and B field

can be done for optics a few wavelengths in size Waveguide for microwave radiation Green = magnetic field! Red = electric fiels http://www.comsol.com/blogs/quick-intro-modeling-rf-microwave-heating/

Simplified with Wave Equation in Matter r 2 E ~ µ @ 2 E ~ 4 µ c 2 @t 2 c 2 @ ~ E @t = 0 Now one equation for E field

Solutions with plane waves!t) Plane Vector Wave ansatz: E ~ = E ~ 0 e i ( ~ k ~x ~ k spatially and temporally constant wave vector ~ k normal to surfaces of constant phase ~ k wave number ~x spatial location! angular frequency (2 frequency) t time ~E 0 a (generally complex) vector independent of time and space real electric field vector given by real part of ~ E Scalar Wave electric field at position ~r at time t is Ẽ( ~r, t) complex notation to easily express amplitude and phase real part of complex quantity is the physical quantity

Young s Double Slit Experiment monochromatic wave infinitely small holes (pinholes) source S generates fields Ẽ(~r 1, t) Ẽ1(t) at S 1 and Ẽ(~r 2, t) Ẽ2(t) at S 2 two spherical waves from pinholes interfere on screen electrical field at P Ẽ P (t) = C 1 Ẽ 1 (t t 1 )+ C 2 Ẽ 2 (t t 2 ) t 1 = r 1 /c, t 2 = r 2 /c r 1, r 2 : path lengths from S 1, S 2 to P propagators C 1,2 = i

Two pinholes produce diffraction pattern no tilt tilt by 0.5 /d Change in Angle of Incoming Wave phase of fringe pattern changes, but not fringe spacing tilt of /d produces identical fringe pattern

Different wavelengths make envelope long wavelength short wavelength wavelength average Change in Wavelength fringe spacing changes, central fringe broadens integral over 0.8 to 1.2 of central wavelength integral over wavelength makes fringe envelope

Visibility Function V I min V = I max I max + I min I max, I min are maximum and adjacent minimum in fringe pattern

Fringes seen at VLT! of the star Sirius

Why do we not see fringes everywhere during the day? COHERENCE Real world sources are: Not point like Not monochromatic

Why do we not see fringes everywhere during the day? The Electric fields of two waves are! added together at P If you had a detector that could measure! at the frequency of the light (10e15 Hz).! but we use time averaged detectors

Coherence Mutual Coherence total field in point P Ẽ P (t) = C 1 Ẽ 1 (t t 1 )+ C 2 Ẽ 2 (t t 2 ) irradiance at P, averaged over time (expectation operator E) o I = E ẼP(t) 2 = E nẽp (t)ẽ P (t) writing out all the terms I = C o 1 C 1 E nẽ1 (t t 1 )Ẽ 1 (t t 1) + C o 2 C 2 E nẽ2 (t t 2 )Ẽ 2 (t t 2) + C o 1 C 2 E nẽ1 (t t 1 )Ẽ 2 (t t 2) + C 1 C o 2 E nẽ1 (t t 1 )Ẽ2(t t 2 )

stationary wave field, time average independent of absolute time o o = E nẽ1 (t)ẽ 1 (t), I S2 = E nẽ2 (t)ẽ 2 (t) I S1 irradiance at P is now I = C 1 C 1 I S1 + C 2 C 2 I S2 + C o 1 C 2 E nẽ1 (t t 1 )Ẽ 2 (t t 2) + C 1 C o n o 2 E nẽ 1 (t n t 1 )Ẽ2(t t 2 ) o time difference = t 2 t 1 ) last two terms become o C 1 C 2 E nẽ1 (t + )Ẽ 2 (t) + C 1 C o 2 E nẽ 1 (t + )Ẽ2(t) equivalent to 2 Re h C1 C 2 E nẽ1 (t + )Ẽ 2 (t) oi propagators C purely imaginary: C 1 C 2 = C 1 C 2 = C 1 C 2 cross-term becomes 2 C 1 C h oi 2 Re E nẽ1 (t + )Ẽ 2 (t)

irradiance at P I = C 1 C 1 I S1 + C 2 C 2 I S2 +2 C 1 C h oi 2 Re E nẽ1 (t + )Ẽ 2 (t) mutual coherence function of wave field at S 1 and S 2 o 12 ( ) =E nẽ1 (t + )Ẽ 2 (t) therefore I = C 1 2 I S1 + C 2 2 I S2 + 2 C 1 C 2 Re 12 ( ) I 1 = C 1 2 I S1, I 2 = C 2 2 I S2 : irradiances at P from single aperture I = I 1 + I 2 + 2 C 1 C 2 Re 12( )

Self-Coherence S 1 = S 2 ) mutual coherence function = autocorrelation 11 ( ) = R o 1 ( ) = E nẽ1 (t + )Ẽ 1 (t) 22 ( ) = R o 2 ( ) = E nẽ2 (t + )Ẽ 2 (t) autocorrelation functions are also called self-coherence functions for = 0 I S1 I S2 = E = E nẽ1 (t)ẽ 1 (t) o nẽ2 (t)ẽ 2 (t) o = 11 (0) = E = 22 (0) = E n Ẽ1(t) 2o n Ẽ2(t) 2o autocorrelation function with zero lag ( = 0) represent (average) irradiance (power) of wave field at S 1, S 2

Complex Degree of Coherence using selfcoherence functions C 1 C 2 = p p I1 p I2 11(0) p 22(0) normalized mutual coherence defines the complex degree of coherence o 12 ( ) E nẽ1 (t + )Ẽ 12 ( ) p 11(0) 22 (0) = 2 (t) r o o E n Ẽ1(t) 2 E n Ẽ2(t) 2 irradiance in point P as general interference law for a partially coherent radiation field I = I 1 + I 2 + 2 p I 1 I 2 Re 12 ( )

Spatial and Temporal Coherence complex degree of coherence 12 ( ) p 12 ( ) 11(0) 22 (0) = o E nẽ1 (t + )Ẽ 2 (t) r o o E n Ẽ1(t) 2 E n Ẽ2(t) 2 measures both spatial coherence at S 1 and S 2 temporal coherence through time lag 12 ( ) is a complex variable and can be written as: 12 ( ) = 12 ( ) e i 12( ) 0 apple 12 ( ) apple 1 phase angle 12 ( ) relates to phase angle between fields at S 1 and S 2 phase angle difference in P resulting in time lag

Coherence of Quasi-Monochromatic Light quasi-monochromatic light, mean wavelength, frequency, phase difference due to optical path difference: = 2 (r 2 r 1 ) = 2 c(t 2 t 1 ) = 2 with phase angle 12 ( ) between fields at pinholes S 1, S 2 12( ) = 12 ( ) and Re 12 ( ) = 12 ( ) cos [ 12 ( ) ] intensity in P becomes I = I 1 + I 2 + 2 p I 1 I 2 12 ( ) cos [ 12 ( ) ]

Visibility of Quasi-Monochromatic, Partially Coherent Light intensity in P I = I 1 + I 2 + 2 p I 1 I 2 12 ( ) cos [ 12 ( ) ] maximum, minimum I for cos(...) =±1 visibility V at position P V = 2p I 1 p I2 I 1 + I 2 12 ( ) for I 1 = I 2 = I 0 I = 2I 0 {1 + 12 ( ) cos [ 12 ( ) ]} V = 12 ( )

Interpretation of Visibility for I 1 = I 2 = I 0 I = 2I 0 {1 + 12 ( ) cos [ 12 ( ) ]} V = 12 ( ) modulus of complex degree of coherence = visibility of fringes modulus can therefore be measured shift in location of central fringe (no optical path length difference, = 0) is measure of 12 ( ) measurements of visibility and fringe position yield amplitude and phase of complex degree of coherence

Fringe Pattern for I 1 = I 2 = I 0 I = 2I 0 {1 + 12 ( ) cos [ 12 ( ) ]} V = 12 ( ) source S on central axis, fully coherent waves from two holes I = 2I 0 (1 + cos ) = 4I 0 cos 2 2

I = 4I 0 cos 2 2 = 2 (r 2 r 1 ) = 2 distance a between pinholes distance s to observation plane O, s a path difference (r 2 r 1 ) in equation for in good approximation r 2 r 1 = a = a s y and therefore I = 4I 0 cos 2 ay s

Interference Fringes from Monochromatic Point Source irradiance as a function of the y-coordinate of the fringes in observation plane O irradiance vs. distance distribution is Point-Spread Function (PSF) of ideal two-element interferometer

Huygens-Fresnel Principle en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:refraction_on_an_aperture_-_huygens-fresnel_principle.svg every unobstructed point of a wavefront at a given moment in time serves as a source of spherical, secondary waves with the same frequency as the primary wave the amplitude of the optical field at any point beyond is the coherent superposition of all these secondary, spherical waves

Diffraction If obstructions are small compared! to the wavelength, then waves! will spread out Huygens-Fresnel works for most! cases and is much faster than! solving Maxwell s Equations!

Fraunhoffer and Fresnel Diffraction en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:fraunhofer_diffraction_pattern_image.png wave shape changes as it moves away from obstruction Fresnel (or near-field) diffraction close to obstruction em Fraunhofer (or far-field) diffraction far away from obstruction rule of thumb: Frauenhofer diffraction for R > a 2 /

Single Slit Diffraction hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/sinslit.html diffraction of a plane wave on a slit aperture Huygens-Fresnel: line of spherical wave sources

Break slit into many small radiating elements with E 0 the strength of each slit segment i at point P is E i (P) = E L r i sin(k! kr i ) y i i segment index (1 M) E L source strength per unit length r i distance between segment and point P y i small segment of slit D length of slit ristoph U. Keller, Leiden Observatory ATI 2014 Lecture 2: Interference, Diffraction and Fourier Theory

Integrate small elements along slit integrate along slit E = E L Z D/2 D/2 sin!t r kr dy express r as a function of y: r = R y sin + y 2 2R cos2 +... R distance between center of slit and point P substituting, integrating and squaring for intensity: I( ) =I(0) sin 2 =(kd/2) sin

Destructive interference hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/sinslitd.html assume infinite distance from aperture for source and observation plane equivalent to plane waves coming from aperture into different directions first minimum when phase delay at edge is exactly one wave

Circular aperture diffraction integrate over circular aperture with radius a E = E Ae i(!t R kr) Z Z aperture e ik(yy+zz)/r ds using polar coordinates in aperture and plane of observation and Bessel functions I( ) =I(0) 2J1 (ka sin ) ka sin 2 J 1 Bessel function of order 1 Airy function first dark ring at 1.22 R 2a images with perfect telescopes are convolution of Airy disk with actual image

and for any type of aperture from before forgetting common phase term and 1/R amplitude drop-off Z Z E(Y, Z )= A(y, z)e ik(yy+zz)/r ds aperture complex aperture function A(y, z) describing non-uniform absorption and phase delays finite aperture ) change integration boundaries to infinity with k y = ky /R and k z = kz /R we obtain Z Z E(k y, k z )= A(y, z)e i(k y y+k z z) dy dz aperture field distribution in Fraunhofer diffraction pattern is Fourier transform of field distribution across aperture

The Point Spread Function intensity is modulus squared of field distribution ) point-spread function image of a point source: Point Spread Function (PSF) image of arbitrary object is a convolution of object with PSF i = o s i observed image o true object, constant in time s point spread function convolution

The Optical Transfer Function after Fourier transformation: I = O S Fourier transformed I Fourier transform of image O Fourier transform of object S Optical Transfer Function (OTF) OTF is Fourier transform of PSF and vice versa

2 pinholes 2 small holes 2 large holes Finite Hole Diameter fringe spacing only depends on separation of holes and wavelength the smaller the hole, the larger the illuminated area fringe envelope is Airy pattern (diffraction pattern of a single hole)

Interferometer with Finite Apertures non-ideal two-element interferometer with finite apertures using pupil function concept (Observational Astrophysics 1) optical transfer function (OTF) OTF = 2 R 2 apple ( ~ )+ 1 2 ~ ~s/ + 1 2 pair of pinholes transmits three spatial frequencies ~ + ~s/ DC-component ( ~ 0) two high frequencies related to length of baseline vector ~s at ±~s/ 3 spatial frequencies represent three-point sampling of the uv-plane in 2-d spatial frequency space complete sampling of uv-plane provides sufficient information to completely reconstruct original brightness distribution

Point-Spread Function (PSF) PSF is Fourier Transform of OTF ~ ~s/ ~ + ~s/ ( ~ ), 1, e i2 ~ ~s/, e i2 ~ ~s/ Point-Spread Function of 2-element interferometer R 2 h 2(1 + cos 2 ~ i ~s/ ) ~ : 2-d angular coordinate vector = 4 attenuation factor ( /R) 2 from spherical expansion R 2 cos 2 ~ ~s/

2-d Brightness Distribution PSF of single circular aperture PSF of two-element interferometer, aperture diameter d = 25 m, length of baseline vector ~s = 144 m double beam interference fringes showing modulation effect of diffraction by aperture of a single pinhole

Why do we see Airy patterns of stars? Image of Vega taken with! 8.4m diameter telescope in Arizona

van Cittert-Zernike Theorem relates brightness distribution of extended source and phase correlation between two points in radiation field extended source S incoherent, quasi-monochromatic positions P 1 and P 2 in observers plane Ẽ 1 (t)ẽ 2 (t) =E{Ẽ1(t)Ẽ 2 (t)} = 12 (0)

The Solution I( ~ ) is intensity distribution of extended source as function of unit direction vector ~ as seen from observation plane (~r) is coherence function in -plane vector ~r represents arbitrary baseline van Cittert-Zernike theorem Z Z (~r) = I( ~ )= 2 Z Z source -plane I( ~ )e 2 i~.~r d ~ (~r)e 2 i~.~r d ~r (~r) and I( ~ ) are linked through Fourier transform, except for scaling with wavelength "true" Fourier transform with conjugate variables ~, ~r/, Fourier pair: I( ~ ), (~r/ )