Plate Boundary Observatory Working Group for the Central and Northern San Andreas Fault System PBO-WG-CNSA

Similar documents
Plate Boundary Observatory Working Group Plan for the San Andreas Fault System

Focused Observation of the San Andreas/Calaveras Fault intersection in the region of San Juan Bautista, California

Creepmeter mini-proposal John Langbein, Evelyn Roeloffs, Mick Gladwin, Ross Gwyther

Measurements in the Creeping Section of the Central San Andreas Fault

MAGMATIC, ERUPTIVE AND TECTONIC PROCESSES IN THE ALEUTIAN ARC, ALASKA

TEGAM s Connection to the EarthScope Project

Regional deformation and kinematics from GPS data

Jack Loveless Department of Geosciences Smith College

Aseismic slip and fault-normal strain along the central creeping section of the San Andreas fault

Lab 9: Satellite Geodesy (35 points)

to: Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San

Fault Processes on the Anza section of the San Jacinto Fault

Geo736: Seismicity and California s Active Faults Introduction

2 June 15. Summer Session Horst Rademacher. Lect 3: California EQ. and Faults.

Regional Geodesy. Shimon Wdowinski. MARGINS-RCL Workshop Lithospheric Rupture in the Gulf of California Salton Trough Region. University of Miami

Slow Slip and Tremor Along San Andreas fault system

Estimating fault slip rates, locking distribution, elastic/viscous properites of lithosphere/asthenosphere. Kaj M. Johnson Indiana University

Friction can increase with hold time. This happens through growth and increasing shear strength of contacts ( asperities ).

Ground displacement in a fault zone in the presence of asperities

Other Available Publications

GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 5: 2014 South Napa earthquake GPS strain analysis student exercise

San Francisco Bay Area Earthquake Simulations: A step toward a Standard Physical Earthquake Model

Lecture 20: Slow Slip Events and Stress Transfer. GEOS 655 Tectonic Geodesy Jeff Freymueller

Man-made Earthquakes. 2 June 16. Horst Rademacher HH Lect 4: Earthquakes in the US. Summer Session 2016

The San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth: Recent Site Characterization Studies and the 2.2-Km-Deep Pilot Hole

Predicted reversal and recovery of surface creep on the Hayward fault following the 1906 San Francisco earthquake

Kinematics of the Southern California Fault System Constrained by GPS Measurements

External Grant Award Number 04HQGR0058 IMPROVED THREE-DIMENSIONAL VELOCITY MODELS AND EARTHQUAKE LOCATIONS FOR CALIFORNIA

Part 2 - Engineering Characterization of Earthquakes and Seismic Hazard. Earthquake Environment

20 mm/yr mm/yr BERI DTCH MRDR. WHAL Atka AFZ

} based on composition

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 24

Azimuth with RH rule. Quadrant. S 180 Quadrant Azimuth. Azimuth with RH rule N 45 W. Quadrant Azimuth

GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 4: GPS strain analysis examples Student exercise

EARTHQUAKE LOCATIONS INDICATE PLATE BOUNDARIES EARTHQUAKE MECHANISMS SHOW MOTION

Magnitude 6.5 OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

Integrating Geologic and Geodetic Estimates of Slip Rate on the San Andreas Fault System

Earthquakes. Earthquake Magnitudes 10/1/2013. Environmental Geology Chapter 8 Earthquakes and Related Phenomena

Comparison of Strain Rate Maps

overlie the seismogenic zone offshore Costa Rica, making the margin particularly well suited for combined land and ocean geophysical studies (Figure

The Earthquake Cycle Chapter :: n/a

Journal of Geophysical Research Letters Supporting Information for

Quaternary Processes of the Monterey Bay Area Field Trip Notes

Yellowstone Hotspot Component of the Plate Boundary Observatory

Verification of the asperity model using seismogenic fault materials Abstract

Stress modulation on the San Andreas fault by interseismic fault system interactions Jack Loveless and Brendan Meade, Geology, 2011

Seismic and aseismic processes in elastodynamic simulations of spontaneous fault slip

Earthquakes. Pt Reyes Station 1906

GPS strain analysis examples Instructor notes

MAR110 Lecture #5 Plate Tectonics-Earthquakes

DCPP Seismic FAQ s Geosciences Department 08/04/2011 GM1) What magnitude earthquake is DCPP designed for?

Slip Characteristics of San Andreas Fault Transition Zone Segments. Ingrid Anne Johanson. B.S. (University of California, Los Angeles) 1998

CHAPTER 1 BASIC SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE TERMINOLGY. Earth Formation Plate Tectonics Sources of Earthquakes...

Transition from stick-slip to stable sliding: the crucial effect of asperities

Plate Boundary Observatory the first five years

Variations in Tremor Activity and Implications for Lower Crustal Deformation Along the Central San Andreas Fault

Frictional Properties on the San Andreas Fault near Parkfield, California, Inferred from Models of Afterslip following the 2004 Earthquake

Earthquakes and Earthquake Hazards Earth - Chapter 11 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

The Non-volcanic tremor observation in Northern Cascadia. Hsieh Hsin Sung 3/22

Exploring Plate Motion and Deformation in California with GPS

UC Berkeley Berkeley Scientific Journal

A Time-Dependent Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Model for California

What scientists know and do not know about the big one at Cascadia

Active Fault Observation and Research on Earthquake Potential in Taiwan. Chao-Chung Lin Central Geological Survey, Taiwan

GEORED Project: GNSS Geodesy Network for Geodynamics Research in Colombia, South America. Héctor Mora-Páez

Earthquakes. Building Earth s Surface, Part 2. Science 330 Summer What is an earthquake?

Collaborative Proposal for Research Applications. of Existing Western US GPS Networks

Earthquakes and Faulting

Earthquakes Chapter 19

Supporting Information for Break of slope in earthquake-size distribution reveals creep rate along the San Andreas fault system

Spatiotemporal evolution of a transient slip event on the San Andreas fault near Parkfield, California

Learning Objectives (LO)! Lecture 11: Plate Tectonics II! No Homework!! ** Chapter 3 **! What we ll learn today:!

Supplementary Material

Real time Monitoring System for Earthquakes and Tsunamis (DONET)

Using deformation rates in Northern Cascadia to constrain time-dependent stress- and slip-rate on the megathrust

Earthquakes Earth, 9th edition, Chapter 11 Key Concepts What is an earthquake? Earthquake focus and epicenter What is an earthquake?

Deformation cycles of great subduction earthquakes in a viscoelastic Earth

Separating Tectonic, Magmatic, Hydrological, and Landslide Signals in GPS Measurements near Lake Tahoe, Nevada-California

Lower Bounds on Ground Motion at Point Reyes During the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake from Train Toppling Analysis

Earthquake Source. Kazuki Koketsu. Special Session: Great East Japan (Tohoku) Earthquake. Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo

#13 Earthquake Prediction

Overview of Seismic Source Characterization for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant

The New Knowledge Leads to Greater Understanding...

Qualitative modeling of earthquakes and aseismic slip in the Tohoku-Oki area. Nadia Lapusta, Caltech Hiroyuki Noda, JAMSTEC

Earthquake Tectonics and Hazards on the Continents June Recognizing and characterizing strike-slip faults and earthquakes in USA

Kinematics and geodynamics of the Cascadia convergent margin A proposal from the PANGA Investigator Community*

The problem (1/2) GPS velocity fields in plate boundary zones are very smooth. What does this smoothness hide?

COVER SHEET FOR PROPOSAL TO THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Numerical modeling of strike-slip creeping faults and implications for the Hayward fault, California

USArray the first five years

Geodetic constraints on San Francisco Bay Area fault slip rates and potential seismogenic asperities on the partially creeping Hayward fault

Earthquake prediction. Southwest BC: Our local dangerous fault zones

Three Fs of earthquakes: forces, faults, and friction. Slow accumulation and rapid release of elastic energy.

Implications of recent asperity failures and aseismic creep for time- dependent earthquake hazard on the Hayward fault

Utah State University. Ryan M. Lee Utah State University

September 5, 2012 M 7.6 Costa Rica Earthquake

ANNUAL PROJECT SUMMARY AWARD NUMBER: 99HQGR0062

News Release December 30, 2004 The Science behind the Aceh Earthquake

LAB: PLATE TECTONICS GOAL: Calculate rates of plate movement

Earthquake distribution is not random: very narrow deforming zones (= plate boundaries) versus large areas with no earthquakes (= rigid plate

Transcription:

Plate Boundary Observatory Working Group for the Central and Northern San Andreas Fault System PBO-WG-CNSA Introduction Our proposal focuses on the San Andreas fault system in central and northern California. In particular, we wish to investigate the deformation and seismicity associated with the locked and creeping segments of the fault system. We are interested in transient features associated with seismic and aseismic events, as well as the kinematics of secular deformation. In this region, major earthquakes threaten important population centers. The occurrence of frequent moderate earthquakes within 10 km of the surface afford the opportunity to obtain near-field source information. We have access to the transition between the locked and creeping segments of the San Andreas fault. And, existing instrumentation and data provide a base for achievement of the goals listed below. We are proposing Global Positioning System (GPS) and Borehole Strain (BHS) instrumentation for the San Andreas fault system central and northern California. The instrument numbers in this proposal are predicated on the assumption that there will be 200 to 300 GPS instruments and 50 to 75 BHS instruments available for this area. The area under discussion extends from the Mendocino triple junction on the north to south of Parkfield (Fig. 1). The area is comprised of five sub-regions with differing tectonic styles. From north to south, these are: the Mendocino Triple Junction, Northern San Andreas Fault System, San Francisco Bay Area, Central Creeping San Andreas Fault, Parkfield. In the next few sections of this white paper, we will present the science goals we can be address by PBO in this region, then discuss each of these sub-regions. Science Goals Detect episodic inter-seismic deformation events and subsequent strain redistribution, particularly in regions of transition from fully locked to partially creeping faults of the San Andreas Fault system (e.g. Hayward-Rodgers Creek, San Andreas north of San Juan Bautista, Parkfield ). [Methods: BHSM, CGPS, SGPS, BHSeismic] Observe all phases of the earthquake deformation cycle (pre-, co-, post, and interseismic motions) on selected target fault segments with dense networks (e.g. all major SF Bay Area faults, Parkfield). In particular, capture earthquake nucleation and nucleation of aseismic fault failure in the near-field of these events. [Methods: CGPS, BHSM] Measure slip partitioning among major faults of the San Andreas System. [Methods: CGPS, SGPS] 2000/10/11-16:46 PBO - Central and Northern San Andreas Fault Page 1

Determine depth distribution of inter-seismic slip for high hazard faults (e.g. N. Hayward fault). [Methods: CGPS, SGPS] Design philosophy We believe that for both strain and GPS experiments, but particularly for strain experiments, the best experiment design is one that includes multiple instruments at relatively dense spacing. We would like to install the strain meters in clusters of 5 instruments minimum. Spacing within each cluster will vary depending upon logistics and geophysical objectives, but will be on the order of 2 to 10 km. The spacing of the GPS stations will be optimized in each array to address the primary scientific objectives for each region. The spacing will vary from dense profiles with stations every 5 km, to a broadly spaced arrays with a distributed spacing of 25km. Although the total number of instruments that will be available from PBO is large relative to previously available resources, it will still not be adequate to optimally instrument the entire area of Northern and Central California. Therefore the requests described below represent a compromise between a thin distribution of instruments that would sparsely cover the entire region without adequately covering any region, and a dense instrumentation in just a few areas. Mendocino Triple Junction Request: 10 Strain The Mendocino Triple Junction lies at the intersection of the Gorda, Pacific and North America plates. It is the transition zone where the strike slip motion typical of the San Andreas system terminates against the subduction to the north. This area is one of the most seismically active areas in California. Magnitude 6+ events are relatively common here, making it an attractive area for investigations of time dependent phenomena. However, much of the activity occurs offshore. Currently there are 39 GPS stations that have been surveyed in campaign mode is this area. We propose to add both strain and GPS instrumentation. Northern San Andreas Fault System Request: 5 Strain The Northern San Andreas fault system extends from the Mendocino triple junction south to Point Reyes. It includes the San Andreas fault zone, which is mostly offshore through the area, and the parallel Maacama and Bartlett Springs fault zones to the east. Most current microseismicity occurs on the Maacama and Bartlett Springs faults. For example, the UC Berkeley catalog contains only one M 3.0 or greater event in 1998 and none in 1999 along the San Andreas fault itself. The San Andreas fault last ruptured in a M 7.7 event in 1906. The long term slip rates and current strain accumulation rates on the faults are thought to be: San Andreas, 20-25 mm/yr; Maacama, 10-15 mm/yr and Bartlett 2000/10/11-16:46 PBO - Central and Northern San Andreas Fault Page 2

Springs, 3-10 mm/yr. There will not be sufficient resources to properly instrument this entire area. Therefore we are planning to use a few instruments, one strain cluster plus GPS, to fully instrument one section of this area. The focus of the experiment has not yet been decided. Following the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake surface creep was accelerated in the northern portion of the creeping segment. Similarly enhanced creep following the M 7 1838 SAF earthquake could be implicated to have helped trigger the great M 8 1857 earthquake rupturing southward from Parkfield. Both the mechanics of creep in general and the interaction across the creeping segment are quite interesting. This is one area where creepmeters would be particularly suitable. San Francisco Bay Area Request: 100 GPS 25 Strain The San Francisco Bay area is a transition region between the three locked fault zones to the north and the creeping single San Andreas fault zone to the south. We include the San Juan Bautista-Hollister area as part of the SF Bay. Faults in the SF Bay area display a mix of creeping and locked behavior. Seismicity is also mixed in this area, with some faults having very little microseismicity and some quite a lot. The region is densely populated and heavily built-up. The region is high on the list of sites world-wide with the largest numbers of people living close to hazardous fault. For all of these reasons, we propose putting a significant fraction of the resources available in this area. For the strain instruments, there will be several targets: the creeping-locked transition zone near San Juan Bautista that continues to produce interesting time-dependent signals; the Hayward fault is a highly hazardous fault that is simultaneously creeping and locked (though probably not the same fault patches at the same time). Central Creeping San Andreas Fault Request: 10 GPS 5 Strain Between Hollister and Parkfield, the San Andreas fault is creeping, i.e. slipping continuously and aseismically. It produces abundant microseismicity, but probably rarely produces events above Magnitude 6. At the surface the creep is often episodic, occurring in small jumps of few millimeters or less. It is believed that this episodic behavior transitions to a more continuous motion at depth. Macroscopically, the deformation appears rigid-block like with the two sides of the fault sliding past each other continuously and no evidence of strain accumulation. Based on the apparent simplicity of the section, the low population density, and the low probability of large earthquakes, we propose few instruments for this section. Parkfield Area Request: 15 Strain 2000/10/11-16:46 PBO - Central and Northern San Andreas Fault Page 3

Monitoring at Parkfield began in 1966 after the most recent in a series of 5 moderate earthquakes that have occurred there since 1857. The earthquakes have occurred about every 22 years and look remarkably similar. Parkfield became the classic example for repeating earthquakes and the characteristic earthquake model. Within the next few years, a 4-km deep hole is likely to be drilled into the fault zone which should provide measurements of fault properties both in the creeping zone and areas of small, repeating earthquakes. There are nearly 50 strong motion instruments in the area. Parkfield offers PBO a unique opportunity: A rich set of complementary instruments (Drill hole, strong motion, creep, other geophysical); a rich source of time dependent signals; and, a high probability of a moderate earthquake during the life of PBO. Central and Northern California Background Instrumentation Request: 20 GPS 0 Strain Thus far we have discussed the various parts of Central and Northern California in isolation. We anticipate that when we start the detailed work of siting the stations, we will find some significant holes between the sub-regions. Therefore we are requesting a few receivers that will be used to tie the other experiments together or to fill in other kinds of gaps. Requested resources Total request: 250 GPS 60 Strain Glossary BHSeismic BHSM CGPS GPS PBO SGPS PBO-WG-CNSA Bore hole seismometers Bore hole strain meters Continuous GPS Global Positioning System Plate Boundary Observatory Survey-mode GPS Plate Boundary Observatory Working for Central and Northern San Andreas Plate Boundary Observatory Working Group for Central and Northern San Andreas G. Bawden R. Burgmann M. Johnston L. Kellogg J. Langbein D. Manaker M. Murray W. Prescott E. Roeloffs B. Romanowicz P. Segall S. Schwartz E. Silver W. Thatcher 2000/10/11-16:46 PBO - Central and Northern San Andreas Fault Page 4

Suggested for PBO Mendocino 10 Strain Calif-Cascadia 0 Strain 0 GPS covered by Cascadia group Existing or soon-to-be Continuous GPS Campaign GPS Existing Strain Mini-PBO Strain 40 Northern SAF 5 Strain 38 SF Bay Area 25 Strain 100 GPS Creeping SAF 5 Strain 10 GPS 36 Plus backbone 20 GPS distributed to cover significant holes in the other deployments. 236 Greater Parkfield 15 Strain 238 240