Quadratic Sets 4.5 Elliptic, Parabolic and Hyperbolic Quadratic Sets

Similar documents
Analytical Geometry. 2.4 The Hyperbolic Quadric of PG(3,F)

Lax embeddings of the Hermitian Unital

SUBSTRUCTURES OF FINITE CLASSICAL POLAR SPACES

Finite affine planes in projective spaces

Hyperplanes of Hermitian dual polar spaces of rank 3 containing a quad

On the structure of the directions not determined by a large affine point set

Derivation Techniques on the Hermitian Surface

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

Lax Embeddings of Generalized Quadrangles in Finite Projective Spaces

Vertex opposition in spherical buildings

Number of points in the intersection of two quadrics defined over finite fields

Large minimal covers of PG(3,q)

Two-intersection sets with respect to lines on the Klein quadric

Functional codes arising from quadric intersections with Hermitian varieties

Characterizations of the finite quadric Veroneseans V 2n

On small minimal blocking sets in classical generalized quadrangles

European Journal of Combinatorics. Locally subquadrangular hyperplanes in symplectic and Hermitian dual polar spaces

Synthetic Geometry. 1.4 Quotient Geometries

Theorems of Erdős-Ko-Rado type in polar spaces

On the geometry of regular hyperbolic fibrations

The geometry of secants in embedded polar spaces

Collineations of polar spaces with restricted displacements

Shult Sets and Translation Ovoids of the Hermitian Surface

Generalized Quadrangles Weakly Embedded in Finite Projective Space

Blocking sets of tangent and external lines to a hyperbolic quadric in P G(3, q), q even

Codes from generalized hexagons

A Quasi Curtis-Tits-Phan theorem for the symplectic group

Embeddings of Small Generalized Polygons

On the intersection of Hermitian surfaces

Neutral Geometry. October 25, c 2009 Charles Delman

Generalized quadrangles and the Axiom of Veblen

Some Two Character Sets

A subset of the Hermitian surface

Semifield flocks, eggs, and ovoids of Q(4, q)

A characterization of the Split Cayley Generalized Hexagon H(q) using one subhexagon of order (1, q)

The geometry of finite fields

UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI ROMA LA SAPIENZA. Semifield spreads

A spectrum result on minimal blocking sets with respect to the planes of PG(3, q), q odd

Chapter 3. Betweenness (ordering) A system satisfying the incidence and betweenness axioms is an ordered incidence plane (p. 118).

β : V V k, (x, y) x yφ

Tight Sets and m-ovoids of Quadrics 1

Identifying codes in vertex-transitive graphs and strongly regular graphs

A characterization of the finite Veronesean by intersection properties

The L 3 (4) near octagon

Contents. Index... 15

On the intersection of Hermitian surfaces

Dense near octagons with four points on each line, III

arxiv: v6 [math.mg] 9 May 2014

Constructing the Tits Ovoid from an Elliptic Quadric. Bill Cherowitzo UCDHSC-DDC July 1, 2006 Combinatorics 2006

1.4 Equivalence Relations and Partitions

Exterior powers and Clifford algebras

Codewords of small weight in the (dual) code of points and k-spaces of P G(n, q)

Planar and Affine Spaces

10. Noether Normalization and Hilbert s Nullstellensatz

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #17 11/05/2013

arxiv: v1 [math.mg] 4 Jan 2013

Recursive constructions for large caps

Orthogonal Arrays & Codes

Two-character sets as subsets of parabolic quadrics

On Exceptional Lie Geometries

SPG systems and semipartial geometries

Generalized Quadrangles with a Spread of Symmetry

A characterization of the set of lines either external to or secant to an ovoid in PG(3,q)

CHAPTER 7. Connectedness

On the nucleus of the Grassmann embedding of the symplectic dual polar space DSp(2n, F), char(f) = 2

Group theoretic characterizations of Buekenhout Metz unitals in PG(2,q 2 )

Intransitive geometries

Definition. Example: In Z 13

Domesticity in projective spaces

A Lemma on the Minimal Counter-example of Frankl s Conjecture

The Symmetric Space for SL n (R)

Computational Methods in Finite Geometry

Generalized Veronesean embeddings of projective spaces, Part II. The lax case.

The maximum size of a partial spread in H(4n + 1,q 2 ) is q 2n+1 + 1

13. Forms and polar spaces

Characterizations of Segre Varieties

Unextendible Mutually Unbiased Bases (after Mandayam, Bandyopadhyay, Grassl and Wootters)

ON THE STRUCTURE OF (t mod q)-arcs IN FINITE PROJECTIVE GEOMETRIES

On bisectors in Minkowski normed space.

Collineation groups of translation planes admitting hyperbolic Buekenhout or parabolic Buekenhout Metz unitals

Representation Theory and Orbital Varieties. Thomas Pietraho Bowdoin College

LINKAGE CLASSES OF GRADE 3 PERFECT IDEALS

Groups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order

6.4 BASIS AND DIMENSION (Review) DEF 1 Vectors v 1, v 2,, v k in a vector space V are said to form a basis for V if. (a) v 1,, v k span V and

Hyperbolic lines in generalized polygons

A Geometric Characterization of the Perfect Ree-Tits Generalized Octagons.

On the chromatic number of q-kneser graphs

Compact hyperbolic Coxeter n-polytopes with n + 3 facets

Distance-j Ovoids and Related Structures in Generalized Polygons

Base subsets of polar Grassmannians

Projection pencils of quadrics and Ivory s theorem

Course Notes for EE227C (Spring 2018): Convex Optimization and Approximation

On Cameron-Liebler line classes with large parameter

Generalized polygons in projective spaces

The Flag-Transitive C3-Geometries of Finite Order

Transitive Partial Hyperbolic Flocks of Deficiency One

About Maximal Partial 2-Spreads in PG(3m 1, q)

NAME: Mathematics 205A, Fall 2008, Final Examination. Answer Key

1 Some loose ends from last time

SPACES OF RATIONAL CURVES IN COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS

Transcription:

Quadratic Sets 4.5 Elliptic, Parabolic and Hyperbolic Quadratic Sets

Definitions Def: Let Q be a nondegenerate quadratic set in a d-dimensional projective space P (not assumed to be finite). If d is even and the index of Q is ½d then Q is called parabolic. If d is odd and the index of Q is ½(d-1) then Q is called elliptic. Finally, if d is odd and the index of Q is ½(d+1) then Q is called hyperbolic.

Examples a) Theorem 4.4.4 can be reformulated as: Any nonempty nondegenerate quadratic set of a finite projective space is elliptic, parabolic or hyperbolic. b) The parabolic quadratic sets of a projective plane are the ovals. c) In a 3-dimensional projective space, the elliptic quadratic sets are the ovoids and the hyperbolic quadratic sets are the hyperboloids.

A More General Definition of a Cone Def: Let H be a hyperplane of a projective space P, and let V be a point outside of H. If Q* is a nondegenerate quadratic set of H the quadratic set Q = (VX), X Q* is called a cone with vertex V over Q*.

Parabolic Quadratic Sets Theorem 4.5.1: Let Q be a parabolic quadratic set in a 2tdimensional projective space P with t > 1. a) Let H = Q P be a tangent hyperplane. Then Q' = Q H is a cone over a parabolic quadratic set with vertex P. b) Let H* be a hyperplane that is not a tangent hyperplane. Then Q* = Q H* is an elliptic or hyperbolic quadratic set. Pf: a) Let W be a complement of P in H, and define Q'' = Q W. By Lemma 4.1.4, Q'' is a nondegenerate quadratic set. If U denotes a maximal Q-subspace through P, then U'' = U W has dimension dim(u) 1. By Theorem 4.2.4, U'' is a maximal Q''-subspace, therefore Q'' is parabolic. Since,by Lemma 4.1.3, the radical of Q' consists of just one point, namely P, Q' is a cone over Q''.

Parabolic Quadratic Sets Theorem 4.5.1: Let Q be a parabolic quadratic set in a 2tdimensional projective space P with t > 1. a) Let H = Q P be a tangent hyperplane. Then Q' = Q H is a cone over a parabolic quadratic set with vertex P. b) Let H* be a hyperplane that is not a tangent hyperplane. Then Q* = Q H* is an elliptic or hyperbolic quadratic set. Pf (cont): b) Since H* is not a tangent hyperplane, Q* is nondegenerate (see 4.1.4). A maximal Q-subspace (which is a subspace of dimension t-1) intersects H* in a subspace of dimension t-1 or t-2. This means that Q* is elliptic or hyperbolic.

Finite Parabolic Quadratic Sets Corollary 4.5.2: Let Q be a nonempty, nondegenerate quadratic set in P = PG(4,q). Then Q induces in any tangent hyperplane a cone, and in any other hyperplane an ovoid or a hyperboloid. Furthermore, Q consists of exactly q 3 + q 2 + q + 1 points, the number of hyperplanes in which Q induces an ovoid is ½q 2 (q 2-1), and the number of hyperplanes in which Q induces a hyperboloid is ½q 2 (q 2 +1). Pf: We know that Q is parabolic. From this the first assertion follows from the Theorem. In particular, we get that for each point P in Q, the quadratic set induced in Q P is a cone with vertex P. Thus the number a of Q-lines through P is q+1. So, by Thm 4.4.1 we have Q = 1 + q 3 + aq = 1 + q 3 + (q+1)q.

Finite Parabolic Quadratic Sets Corollary 4.5.2: Let Q be a nonempty, nondegenerate quadratic set in P = PG(4,q). Then Q induces in any tangent hyperplane a cone, and in any other hyperplane an ovoid or a hyperboloid. Furthermore, Q consists of exactly q 3 + q 2 + q + 1 points, the number of hyperplanes in which Q induces an ovoid is ½q 2 (q 2-1), and the number of hyperplanes in which Q induces a hyperboloid is ½q 2 (q 2 +1). Pf(cont.): Let t = Q = q 3 + q 2 + q + 1, be the number of tangent hyperplanes, h the number of hyperboloid hyperplanes and e the number of ovoid hyperplanes. Clearly, t + h + e = q 4 + q 3 + q 2 + q + 1. So, h + e = q 4. Now a tangent hyperplane contains exactly q 2 +q+1 points of Q, while a hyperboloid hyperplane contains (q+1) 2 and an ovoid hyperplane contains q 2 + 1. Any point of Q is on exactly q 3 + q 2 + q + 1 hyperplanes, thus we have:

Finite Parabolic Quadratic Sets Corollary 4.5.2: Let Q be a nonempty, nondegenerate quadratic set in P = PG(4,q). Then Q induces in any tangent hyperplane a cone, and in any other hyperplane an ovoid or a hyperboloid. Furthermore, Q consists of exactly q 3 + q 2 + q + 1 points, the number of hyperplanes in which Q induces an ovoid is ½q 2 (q 2-1), and the number of hyperplanes in which Q induces a hyperboloid is ½q 2 (q 2 +1). Pf(cont.): t(q 2 + q + 1) + h(q+1) 2 + e(q 2 + 1) = Q (q 3 + q 2 + q + 1). Which implies, h(q+1) 2 + e(q 2 + 1) = Q (q 3 + q 2 + q + 1) - t(q 2 + q + 1) = q 3 (q 3 + q 2 + q + 1). So, h(q+1) 2 + (q 4 - h)(q 2 + 1) = q 3 (q 3 + q 2 + q + 1) or 2qh = q 3 (q 2 + 1).

Hyperbolic Quadratic Sets Theorem 4.5.3: Let Q be a hyperbolic quadratic set of a (2t+1)- dimensional projective space P with t > 1. a) If H = Q P is a tangent hyperplane then Q' = Q H is a cone over a hyperbolic quadratic set with vertex P. b) If H* is a hyperplane which is not a tangent hyperplane then Q* = Q H* is a parabolic quadratic set. Pf: a) Let W be a complement of P in H, and define Q'' = Q W. By Lemma 4.1.4, Q'' is a nondegenerate quadratic set. If U denotes a maximal Q-subspace through P, then U'' = U W has dimension dim(u) 1. By Theorem 4.2.4, U'' is a maximal Q''-subspace, therefore Q'' is hyperbolic. Since,by Lemma 4.1.3, the radical of Q' consists of just one point, namely P, Q' is a cone over Q''. b) follows directly from 4.1.4 and 4.4.3.

A Finite Hyperbolic Quadratic Set Theorem 4.5.4: Let Q be a hyperbolic quadratic set in P = PG(5,q). Then a = (q+1) 2 and Q = q 4 + q 3 + 2q 2 + q + 1 = (q 2 + q + 1)(q 2 + 1). Pf: The number of Q lines through a point P ( = a) is the number of lines through the vertex P in Q P, which equals the number of points in the hyperbolic quadratic set of Theorem 4.5.3. This hyperbolic quadratic set lies in a 3 dimensional space, and so, has (q+1) 2 points. By 4.4.1 b) we obtain: Q = 1 + q 4 + (q+1) 2 q.

Equivalence Def: Let Q be a hyperbolic quadratic set of a 5-dimensional projective space P. We say that two Q-planes π 1 and π 2 are equivalent (written π 1 ~ π 2 ) if π 1 and π 2 are equal or intersect in precisely one point. Lemma 4.5.5: Let Q be a hyperbolic quadratic set of a 5- dimensional projective space P. Then the relation ~ is an equivalence relation. Pf: The relation is obviously reflexive and symmetric, so we need only show that it is transitive. Let π 1, π 2 and π 3 be three Q-planes such that π 1 and π 2 meet at a point P and π 2 and π 3 meet at a point R. Since all lines through P in π 1 and π 2 are tangent lines, it follows that Q P = <π 1,π 2 >. Similarly, Q R = <π 2,π 3 >.

Equivalence Lemma 4.5.5: Let Q be a hyperbolic quadratic set of a 5-dimensional projective space P. Then the relation ~ is an equivalence relation. Pf(cont.): Case I: P = R. We must show that π 1 and π 3 have no additional points in common. Let W be a complement of P in H = Q P and define Q' = Q W. Let g i = π i W (i = 1,2,3). By 4.5.3 we know that Q' is a hyperboloid. Since g 1 and g 2 are skew lines, they belong to the same class of Q' (both in the regulus or both in the opposite regulus). Similarly, g 2 and g 3 are skew, so they are in the same class. Thus, both g 1 and g 3 are in the same class as g 2 and so are skew. Therefore, π 1 π 3 = P.

Equivalence Lemma 4.5.5: Let Q be a hyperbolic quadratic set of a 5-dimensional projective space P. Then the relation ~ is an equivalence relation. Pf(cont.): Case II: P R. In this case π 3 is not contained in Q P. Thus, π 3 intersects the hyperplane Q P in a line g 3. Let W be a complement of P in Q P containing g 3, and define Q' = Q W. Then Q' is a hyperboloid, and g 1 = π 1 W and g 2 = π 2 W are lines of the same class of Q'. Since g 3 intersects g 2 in the point R, g 3 belongs to the other class. This implies that g 3 and g 1 also intersect in some point S. Thus, π 1 π 3 = S.

Equivalence Classes Theorem 4.5.6: Let Q be a hyperbolic quadratic set of a 5- dimensional projective space P. Then the set of all Q-planes is partitioned into exactly two equivalence classes with respect to ~. Pf: Let π 1 and π 2 be two Q-planes that intersect in a line g (these exist by the proof of Theorem 4.2.3). These belong to different equivalence classes. We have to show that every other Q-plane π belongs to one of these two classes. The subspace V = <π 1,π 2 > has dimension 3 and the quadratic set induced by Q in V consists only of the points on these two planes (if it contained another point then V would be a Q-space... but its dimension is too large). Now let π be any Q-plane different from π 1 and π 2. The intersection of π with V must be contained in π 1 π 2 and by the dimension formula must be a point or a line since π is not contained in V (if empty the dimension of <π,v> would be 6).

Equivalence Classes Theorem 4.5.6: Let Q be a hyperbolic quadratic set of a 5-dimensional projective space P. Then the set of all Q-planes is partitioned into exactly two equivalence classes with respect to ~. Pf (cont.): Assume π intersects V in the points of g. Consider a point P on g. By 4.5.3, Q induces in any complement W of P in Q P a hyperboloid. However a point other than P in which π and g intersect is on three Q-planes, thus in W this point is on three distinct Q-lines, a contradiction. So π can not meet g in more than one point. Hence if the intersection is a line, π intersects either one of the planes π 1 or π 2 in a line and the other in a point (the point of intersection of the line with g). On the other hand, if the intersection is a point, the point could not be on g, since that implies that π is equivalent to both π 1 and π 2 (which are not equivalent to each other), so the intersection point is in just one of the planes. In either case π intersects only one of the two planes in a point and so is in the equivalence class of that plane.

Generalized Quadrangles Def: A generalized quadrangle is a rank 2 geometry consisting of points and lines such that a) Any two distinct points are on at most one line. b) All lines are incident with the same number of points; all points are incident with the same number of lines. c) If P is a point outside a line g, then there is precisely one line through P intersecting g.

Structure Theorem Theorem 4.5.8: The geometry consisting of the points, lines and planes of a hyperbolic quadratic set of a 5-dimensional projective space has the following diagram. Pf: The points, lines and planes of a hyperbolic quadratic set Q form a rank 3 geometry. The residue of a Q-plane (all Q-points and Q-lines incident with a plane) clearly form a projective plane, hence the first link. The residue of a Q-line consists of the points on the line and the planes containing the line, and since each of the former is incident with each of the latter, this is the trivial geometry. Finally, consider the residue of a Q-point, all Q-lines and Q-planes containing the point.

Structure Theorem Theorem 4.5.8: The geometry consisting of the points, lines and planes of a hyperbolic quadratic set of a 5-dimensional projective space has the following diagram. Pf: These lines and planes all lie in the tangent hyperplane at that point. Furthermore, by Theorem 4.5.3 (a), the intersection of Q with this hyperplane is a cone over a hyperboloid in 3-dimensional space. The lines of this cone can be identified with the points of the hyperboloid and the planes with the lines on the hyperboloid. That is, the Q-planes, thought of as lines of the residue form a regulus and its opposite regulus. This structure is the 3-dimensional grid, a generalized quadrangle.