Imprimitive symmetric graphs with cyclic blocks

Similar documents
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

Permutation Groups. John Bamberg, Michael Giudici and Cheryl Praeger. Centre for the Mathematics of Symmetry and Computation

2-arc-transitive digraphs

Symmetry properties of generalized graph truncations

Semiregular automorphisms of vertex-transitive graphs

8th PhD Summer School in Discrete Mathematics Vertex-transitive graphs and their local actions II

Arc-transitive pentavalent graphs of order 4pq

Quotients of vertex-transitive graphs

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 1 Jan 2019

Imprimitive Symmetric Graphs

Recent progress on Frobenius graphs and related topics

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 19 Nov 2016

A Family of One-regular Graphs of Valency 4

Finite s-geodesic Transitive Graphs. Wei Jin

Automorphisms of a family of cubic graphs

Pentavalent symmetric graphs of order twice a prime power

Regular actions of groups and inverse semigroups on combinatorial structures

Connectivity of Cayley Graphs: A Special Family

Semiregular automorphisms of vertex-transitive cubic graphs

-ARC-TRANSITIVE GRAPHS Dragan Marusic IMFM, Oddelek za matematiko Univerza v Ljubljani Jadranska 19, 1111 Ljubljana Slovenija

TRIPLE FACTORIZATION OF NON-ABELIAN GROUPS BY TWO MAXIMAL SUBGROUPS

Bulletin of the. Iranian Mathematical Society

Arc-transitive Bicirculants

Cubic vertex-transitive non-cayley graphs of order 8p

Cubic Cayley Graphs and Snarks

On certain Regular Maps with Automorphism group PSL(2, p) Martin Downs

Self-Complementary Metacirculants

HEPTAVALENT SYMMETRIC GRAPHS OF ORDER 6p

HAMILTONICITY OF VERTEX-TRANSITIVE GRAPHS

Line graphs and geodesic transitivity

Rank 3 permutation groups

Algebraically defined graphs and generalized quadrangles

Antipodal Distance Transitive Covers of Complete Graphs

AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS OF CIRCULANT DIGRAPHS WITH APPLICATIONS TO SEMIGROUP THEORY

A TETRAVALENT HALF-ARC-TRANSITIVE GRAPH WITH NONABELIAN VERTEX STABILIZER

For a group G and a subgroup H G, denoteby[g:h] the set of right cosets of H in G, thatis

The L 3 (4) near octagon

A more detailed classification of symmetric cubic graphs

ON THE ORDER OF ARC-STABILISERS IN ARC-TRANSITIVE GRAPHS, II

arxiv: v3 [math.co] 4 Apr 2011

Locally primitive normal Cayley graphs of metacyclic groups

CLASSIFICATION OF CUBIC EDGE-TRANSITIVE GRAPHS OF ORDER 14p 2

M-saturated M={ } M-unsaturated. Perfect Matching. Matchings

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 7 Jan 2019

Tetravalent Graphs Admitting Half-Transitive Group Actions: Alternating Cycles

Locally triangular graphs and normal quotients of n-cubes

Notes on Graph Theory

4-valent graphs of order 6p 2 admitting a group of automorphisms acting regularly on arcs

Tetravalent edge-transitive graphs of girth at most 4

Research Article Nonnormal Edge-Transitive Cubic Cayley Graphs of Dihedral Groups

Abstract Algebra II Groups ( )

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gr] 15 Apr 2003

Cubic Cayley graphs and snarks

A characterization of graphs by codes from their incidence matrices

CHARACTERISING CCA SYLOW CYCLIC GROUPS WHOSE ORDER IS NOT DIVISIBLE BY FOUR

CAYLEY NUMBERS WITH ARBITRARILY MANY DISTINCT PRIME FACTORS arxiv: v1 [math.co] 17 Sep 2015

DECOMPOSITIONS OF MULTIGRAPHS INTO PARTS WITH THE SAME SIZE

PERMUTABILITY GRAPH OF CYCLIC SUBGROUPS

arxiv: v2 [math.gr] 20 Apr 2017

A note on the Isomorphism Problem for Monomial Digraphs

Recall: Matchings. Examples. K n,m, K n, Petersen graph, Q k ; graphs without perfect matching

1 Introductory remarks Throughout this paper graphs are nite, simple and undirected. Adopting the terminology of Tutte [11], a k-arc in a graph X is a

4 = [A, : at(a0)l Finally an amalgam A is finite if A (i = 0, ±1) are finite groups.

Groups Subgroups Normal subgroups Quotient groups Homomorphisms Cyclic groups Permutation groups Cayley s theorem Class equations Sylow theorems

DIGRAPHS WITH SMALL AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS THAT ARE CAYLEY ON TWO NONISOMORPHIC GROUPS

arxiv: v2 [math.gr] 17 Dec 2017

Regular permutation groups. and Cayley graphs. Cheryl E Praeger. University of Western Australia

Graphs & Algorithms: Advanced Topics Nowhere-Zero Flows

Sergey Norin Department of Mathematics and Statistics McGill University Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6, Canada. and

Perfect 1-factorizations

Generalised quadrangles with a group of automorphisms acting primitively on points and lines

1 Introduction We adopt the terminology of [1]. Let D be a digraph, consisting of a set V (D) of vertices and a set E(D) V (D) V (D) of edges. For a n

Self-complementary circulant graphs

Contact author address Dragan Marusic 3 IMFM, Oddelek za matematiko Univerza v Ljubljani Jadranska 19, 1111 Ljubljana Slovenija Tel.: F

Colourings of cubic graphs inducing isomorphic monochromatic subgraphs

Regular embeddings of graphs into surfaces

A characterization of the Split Cayley Generalized Hexagon H(q) using one subhexagon of order (1, q)

Colourings of cubic graphs inducing isomorphic monochromatic subgraphs

and critical partial Latin squares.

The genera, reflexibility and simplicity of regular maps

Definitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations

The Outer Automorphism of S 6

On non-bipartite distance-regular graphs with valency k and smallest eigenvalue not larger than k/2

Locally 3-arc-transitive regular covers of complete bipartite graphs

HAMILTON CYCLES IN CAYLEY GRAPHS

Michael Giudici. on joint work with variously John Bamberg, Martin Liebeck, Cheryl Praeger, Jan Saxl and Pham Huu Tiep

Conditions for the Equivalence of Largeness and Positive vb 1

Permutation Groups and Transformation Semigroups Lecture 4: Idempotent generation

Arc-transitive Cubic Abelian bi-cayley Graphs and BCI-graphs

Partial cubes: structures, characterizations, and constructions

Complete graphs whose topological symmetry groups are polyhedral

Symmetric graphs of order 4p of valency prime

Buildings. Brian Lehmann Cambridge University Part III May Graduate Research Fellowship.

Half-arc-transitive graphs of arbitrary even valency greater than 2

Symmetric bowtie decompositions of the complete graph

Primitive arcs in P G(2, q)

Permutation Group Algorithms

SYMMETRIC AND SEMISYMMETRIC GRAPHS

Some Applications of pq-groups in Graph Theory

Algebraic aspects of Hadamard matrices

Transcription:

Imprimitive symmetric graphs with cyclic blocks Sanming Zhou Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Melbourne Joint work with Cai Heng Li and Cheryl E. Praeger December 17, 2008

Outline 1 Introduction Symmetric graphs Imprimitive symmetric graphs

Outline 1 Introduction Symmetric graphs Imprimitive symmetric graphs 2 A family of imprimitive symmetric graphs

Outline 1 Introduction Symmetric graphs Imprimitive symmetric graphs 2 A family of imprimitive symmetric graphs 3 Imprimitive symmetric graphs with cyclic blocks Cyclic blocks: the simplest case Constructions

Outline 1 Introduction Symmetric graphs Imprimitive symmetric graphs 2 A family of imprimitive symmetric graphs 3 Imprimitive symmetric graphs with cyclic blocks Cyclic blocks: the simplest case Constructions 4 Questions

Arc and s-arc An arc of a graph is an ordered pair of adjacent vertices.

Arc and s-arc An arc of a graph is an ordered pair of adjacent vertices. An s-arc is a sequence of s + 1 vertices such that any two consecutive terms are adjacent and any three consecutive terms are distinct.

Arc and s-arc An arc of a graph is an ordered pair of adjacent vertices. An s-arc is a sequence of s + 1 vertices such that any two consecutive terms are adjacent and any three consecutive terms are distinct. s-arc path of length s.

Arc and s-arc An arc of a graph is an ordered pair of adjacent vertices. An s-arc is a sequence of s + 1 vertices such that any two consecutive terms are adjacent and any three consecutive terms are distinct. s-arc path of length s. Arc(Γ) := set of arcs of a graph Γ.

Symmetric and highly arc-transitive graphs Let Γ admit a group G as a group of automorphisms.

Symmetric and highly arc-transitive graphs Let Γ admit a group G as a group of automorphisms. That is, G acts on V (Γ) and preserves the adjacency of Γ, e.g. G Aut(Γ).

Symmetric and highly arc-transitive graphs Let Γ admit a group G as a group of automorphisms. That is, G acts on V (Γ) and preserves the adjacency of Γ, e.g. G Aut(Γ). Γ is called G-symmetric (or G-arc transitive) if G is transitive on V (Γ) and transitive on Arc(Γ).

Symmetric and highly arc-transitive graphs Let Γ admit a group G as a group of automorphisms. That is, G acts on V (Γ) and preserves the adjacency of Γ, e.g. G Aut(Γ). Γ is called G-symmetric (or G-arc transitive) if G is transitive on V (Γ) and transitive on Arc(Γ). That is, for any α, β V (Γ) there exists g G permuting α to β, and for any (α, β), (γ, δ) Arc(Γ) there exists g G mapping (α, β) to (γ, δ).

Symmetric and highly arc-transitive graphs Let Γ admit a group G as a group of automorphisms. That is, G acts on V (Γ) and preserves the adjacency of Γ, e.g. G Aut(Γ). Γ is called G-symmetric (or G-arc transitive) if G is transitive on V (Γ) and transitive on Arc(Γ). That is, for any α, β V (Γ) there exists g G permuting α to β, and for any (α, β), (γ, δ) Arc(Γ) there exists g G mapping (α, β) to (γ, δ). Γ is called (G, s)-arc transitive if G is transitive on V (Γ) and the set of s-arcs.

An example: Tutte s 8-cage Tutte s 8-cage is 5-arc transitive. It is a cubic graph of girth 8 with minimum order (30 vertices).

Group-theoretic language: coset graphs Let G be a group and H < G be core-free.

Group-theoretic language: coset graphs Let G be a group and H < G be core-free. Let g G be a 2-element such that g N G (H) and g 2 H H g.

Group-theoretic language: coset graphs Let G be a group and H < G be core-free. Let g G be a 2-element such that g N G (H) and g 2 H H g. Cos(G, H, HgH) is defined to be the graph with vertex set [G : H] such that Hx Hy if and only if xy 1 HgH.

Group-theoretic language: coset graphs Let G be a group and H < G be core-free. Let g G be a 2-element such that g N G (H) and g 2 H H g. Cos(G, H, HgH) is defined to be the graph with vertex set [G : H] such that Hx Hy if and only if xy 1 HgH. Cos(G, H, HgH) is G-symmetric, and any symmetric graph is of this form.

Group-theoretic language: coset graphs Let G be a group and H < G be core-free. Let g G be a 2-element such that g N G (H) and g 2 H H g. Cos(G, H, HgH) is defined to be the graph with vertex set [G : H] such that Hx Hy if and only if xy 1 HgH. Cos(G, H, HgH) is G-symmetric, and any symmetric graph is of this form. Cos(G, H, HgH) is connected if and only if H, g = G.

Imprimitive symmetric graphs Let Γ be a G-symmetric graph.

Imprimitive symmetric graphs Let Γ be a G-symmetric graph. A partition B of V (Γ) is G-invariant if for any B B and g G, B g := {α g : α B} B, e.g. trivial partitions {{α} : α V (Γ)} and {V (Γ)}.

Imprimitive symmetric graphs Let Γ be a G-symmetric graph. A partition B of V (Γ) is G-invariant if for any B B and g G, B g := {α g : α B} B, e.g. trivial partitions {{α} : α V (Γ)} and {V (Γ)}. Γ is imprimitive if V (Γ) admits a nontrivial G-invariant partition B.

Imprimitive symmetric graphs Let Γ be a G-symmetric graph. A partition B of V (Γ) is G-invariant if for any B B and g G, B g := {α g : α B} B, e.g. trivial partitions {{α} : α V (Γ)} and {V (Γ)}. Γ is imprimitive if V (Γ) admits a nontrivial G-invariant partition B. This occurs if and only if G α is not a maximal subgroup of G, where G α := {g G : α g = α}.

Imprimitive symmetric graphs Let Γ be a G-symmetric graph. A partition B of V (Γ) is G-invariant if for any B B and g G, B g := {α g : α B} B, e.g. trivial partitions {{α} : α V (Γ)} and {V (Γ)}. Γ is imprimitive if V (Γ) admits a nontrivial G-invariant partition B. This occurs if and only if G α is not a maximal subgroup of G, where G α := {g G : α g = α}. Equivlently, Cos(G, H, HgH) is imprimitive if and only if H is not a maximal subgroup of G.

Imprimitive symmetric graphs Let Γ be a G-symmetric graph. A partition B of V (Γ) is G-invariant if for any B B and g G, B g := {α g : α B} B, e.g. trivial partitions {{α} : α V (Γ)} and {V (Γ)}. Γ is imprimitive if V (Γ) admits a nontrivial G-invariant partition B. This occurs if and only if G α is not a maximal subgroup of G, where G α := {g G : α g = α}. Equivlently, Cos(G, H, HgH) is imprimitive if and only if H is not a maximal subgroup of G. Γ B := quotient graph w.r.t B.

Imprimitive symmetric graphs Let Γ be a G-symmetric graph. A partition B of V (Γ) is G-invariant if for any B B and g G, B g := {α g : α B} B, e.g. trivial partitions {{α} : α V (Γ)} and {V (Γ)}. Γ is imprimitive if V (Γ) admits a nontrivial G-invariant partition B. This occurs if and only if G α is not a maximal subgroup of G, where G α := {g G : α g = α}. Equivlently, Cos(G, H, HgH) is imprimitive if and only if H is not a maximal subgroup of G. Γ B := quotient graph w.r.t B. Γ B is G-symmetric.

An example: Dodecahedron The dodecahedron graph is A 5 -symmetric and the partition with each part containing antipodal vertices is A 5 -invariant. The quotient graph is isomorphic to Petersen graph.

Symmetric graphs with k = v 2 1 Let (Γ, B) be an imprimitive G-symmetric graph.

Symmetric graphs with k = v 2 1 Let (Γ, B) be an imprimitive G-symmetric graph. v := block size of B.

Symmetric graphs with k = v 2 1 Let (Γ, B) be an imprimitive G-symmetric graph. v := block size of B. k := no. vertices in B having a neighbour in C (where B, C are adjacent).

Symmetric graphs with k = v 2 1 Let (Γ, B) be an imprimitive G-symmetric graph. v := block size of B. k := no. vertices in B having a neighbour in C (where B, C are adjacent). Γ[B, C] := bipartite subgraph of Γ induced by B C with isolates deleted.

Symmetric graphs with k = v 2 1 Let (Γ, B) be an imprimitive G-symmetric graph. v := block size of B. k := no. vertices in B having a neighbour in C (where B, C are adjacent). Γ[B, C] := bipartite subgraph of Γ induced by B C with isolates deleted. Consider the case k = v 2 1.

Case k = v 2 1 k = v 2 1 B,C B C

An auxiliary graph when k = v 2 1 B, C := set of vertices of B not adjacent to any vertex of C.

An auxiliary graph when k = v 2 1 B, C := set of vertices of B not adjacent to any vertex of C. B, C = 2.

An auxiliary graph when k = v 2 1 B, C := set of vertices of B not adjacent to any vertex of C. B, C = 2. Γ B := multigraph with vertex set B and an edge joining the two vertices of B, C for each C adjacent to B in Γ B.

An auxiliary graph when k = v 2 1 B, C := set of vertices of B not adjacent to any vertex of C. B, C = 2. Γ B := multigraph with vertex set B and an edge joining the two vertices of B, C for each C adjacent to B in Γ B. Simple(Γ B ) := underlying simple graph of Γ B. Simple(Γ B ) is G B -vertex- and G B -edge-transitive, where G B := {g G : B g = B}.

Structure of Γ B Lemma [Iranmanesh, Praeger, Z] Suppose k = v 2 1. Then one of the following occurs: (a) Γ B is connected; (b) v is even and Simple(Γ B ) is a perfect matching between the vertices of B.

Known results when k = v 2 1 Γ B is (G, 2)-arc transitive (even if Γ is not (G, 2)-arc transitive) iff Γ B is simple and v = 3 or Γ B = (v/2) K 2 (Iranmanesh, Praeger, Z).

Known results when k = v 2 1 Γ B is (G, 2)-arc transitive (even if Γ is not (G, 2)-arc transitive) iff Γ B is simple and v = 3 or Γ B = (v/2) K 2 (Iranmanesh, Praeger, Z). We know when Γ B inherits (G, 2)-arc transitivity from Γ;

Known results when k = v 2 1 Γ B is (G, 2)-arc transitive (even if Γ is not (G, 2)-arc transitive) iff Γ B is simple and v = 3 or Γ B = (v/2) K 2 (Iranmanesh, Praeger, Z). We know when Γ B inherits (G, 2)-arc transitivity from Γ; and some information about Γ and Γ B in this case (Iranmanesh, Praeger, Z).

Known results when k = v 2 1 Γ B is (G, 2)-arc transitive (even if Γ is not (G, 2)-arc transitive) iff Γ B is simple and v = 3 or Γ B = (v/2) K 2 (Iranmanesh, Praeger, Z). We know when Γ B inherits (G, 2)-arc transitivity from Γ; and some information about Γ and Γ B in this case (Iranmanesh, Praeger, Z). But we know nothing about Γ and Γ B when Γ B is connected (except v = 3).

Known results when k = v 2 1 Γ B is (G, 2)-arc transitive (even if Γ is not (G, 2)-arc transitive) iff Γ B is simple and v = 3 or Γ B = (v/2) K 2 (Iranmanesh, Praeger, Z). We know when Γ B inherits (G, 2)-arc transitivity from Γ; and some information about Γ and Γ B in this case (Iranmanesh, Praeger, Z). But we know nothing about Γ and Γ B when Γ B is connected (except v = 3). Let us try the simplest case, namely Simple(Γ B ) has valency 2.

The case when Simple(Γ B ) has valency 2 D,B D C,B B B,C B,D C

The case when Simple(Γ B ) has valency 2 D,B D C,B B B,C B,D C

Local structures Theorem [Li, Praeger, Z] Suppose k = v 2 1, Γ B is connected and Simple(Γ B ) has valency 2. Then Simple(Γ B ) = C v, Γ B is of valency mv (where m is the multiplicity of each edge of Γ B ), and one of the following occurs. (a) v = 3 and Γ is of valency m; (b) v = 4, Γ[B, C] = K 2,2, and Γ is a connected graph of valency 4m; (c) v = 4, Γ[B, C] = 2 K 2, and Γ is of valency 2m.

Regular maps A map is a 2-cell embedding of a connected graph on a closed surface.

Regular maps A map is a 2-cell embedding of a connected graph on a closed surface. A map M is regular if its automorphism group Aut(M) is regular on incident vertex-edge-face triples.

v = 3 and m = 1 1 13 12 13 14 41 12 14 41 31 43 4 42 21 43 42 31 34 24 21 34 24 3 32 (a) 23 2 32 (b) 23 If v = 3 and m = 1, then Γ can be obtained from a regular map of valency 3 by truncation.

Incident vertex-face pairs Let M be a 4-valent regular map, and let G = Aut(M).

Incident vertex-face pairs Let M be a 4-valent regular map, and let G = Aut(M). For each edge {σ, σ } of M, let f, f denote the faces of M such that {σ, σ } is on the boundary of both f and f.

Incident vertex-face pairs Let M be a 4-valent regular map, and let G = Aut(M). For each edge {σ, σ } of M, let f, f denote the faces of M such that {σ, σ } is on the boundary of both f and f. Let O σ (f ) and O σ (f ) be the other two faces of M incident with σ and opposite to f and f respectively.

Incident vertex-face pairs Let M be a 4-valent regular map, and let G = Aut(M). For each edge {σ, σ } of M, let f, f denote the faces of M such that {σ, σ } is on the boundary of both f and f. Let O σ (f ) and O σ (f ) be the other two faces of M incident with σ and opposite to f and f respectively. Define O σ (f ) and O σ (f ) similarly.

Incident vertex-face pairs O σ (f ') f O σ' (f ') O σ (f) σ f ' σ' O σ' (f)

Flag graphs of 4-valent regular maps We construct four graphs Γ 1, Γ 2, Γ 3, Γ 4 as follows. They have vertices the incident vertex-face pairs of M such that for each edge {σ, σ } of M: Γ 1 : (σ, f ) (σ, f ), (σ, f ) (σ, f ) Γ 2 : (σ, f ) (σ, f ), (σ, f ) (σ, f ) Γ 3 : (σ, O σ (f )) (σ, O σ (f )), (σ, O σ (f )) (σ, O σ (f )) Γ 4 : (σ, O σ (f )) (σ, O σ (f )), (σ, O σ (f )) (σ, O σ (f ))

Flag graphs of 4-valent regular maps We construct four graphs Γ 1, Γ 2, Γ 3, Γ 4 as follows. They have vertices the incident vertex-face pairs of M such that for each edge {σ, σ } of M: Γ 1 : (σ, f ) (σ, f ), (σ, f ) (σ, f ) Γ 2 : (σ, f ) (σ, f ), (σ, f ) (σ, f ) Γ 3 : (σ, O σ (f )) (σ, O σ (f )), (σ, O σ (f )) (σ, O σ (f )) Γ 4 : (σ, O σ (f )) (σ, O σ (f )), (σ, O σ (f )) (σ, O σ (f )) These are examples of graphs in case (c) with m = 1.

Flag graphs of 4-valent regular maps We construct four graphs Γ 1, Γ 2, Γ 3, Γ 4 as follows. They have vertices the incident vertex-face pairs of M such that for each edge {σ, σ } of M: Γ 1 : (σ, f ) (σ, f ), (σ, f ) (σ, f ) Γ 2 : (σ, f ) (σ, f ), (σ, f ) (σ, f ) Γ 3 : (σ, O σ (f )) (σ, O σ (f )), (σ, O σ (f )) (σ, O σ (f )) Γ 4 : (σ, O σ (f )) (σ, O σ (f )), (σ, O σ (f )) (σ, O σ (f )) These are examples of graphs in case (c) with m = 1. No example is known in case (c) with m > 1.

A group-theoretic construction Let p be a prime such that p 1 (mod 16), and let G = PSL(2, p).

A group-theoretic construction Let p be a prime such that p 1 (mod 16), and let G = PSL(2, p). Let H be a Sylow 2-subgroup of G.

A group-theoretic construction Let p be a prime such that p 1 (mod 16), and let G = PSL(2, p). Let H be a Sylow 2-subgroup of G. H = a : b = D 16, a 4, b = Z 2 2, N G ( a 4, b ) = S 4.

A group-theoretic construction Let p be a prime such that p 1 (mod 16), and let G = PSL(2, p). Let H be a Sylow 2-subgroup of G. H = a : b = D 16, a 4, b = Z 2 2, N G ( a 4, b ) = S 4. There exists an involution g N G ( a 4, b ) \ a 2, b such that g interchanges a 4 and b.

A group-theoretic construction Let p be a prime such that p 1 (mod 16), and let G = PSL(2, p). Let H be a Sylow 2-subgroup of G. H = a : b = D 16, a 4, b = Z 2 2, N G ( a 4, b ) = S 4. There exists an involution g N G ( a 4, b ) \ a 2, b such that g interchanges a 4 and b. Let L = a 4, ba = Z 2 2.

A group-theoretic construction Define Σ := Cos(G, H, HgH), Γ := Cos(G, L, LgL).

A group-theoretic construction Define Σ := Cos(G, H, HgH), Γ := Cos(G, L, LgL). Γ and Σ are G-symmetric, connected and of valency 4.

A group-theoretic construction Define Σ := Cos(G, H, HgH), Γ := Cos(G, L, LgL). Γ and Σ are G-symmetric, connected and of valency 4. Let B := [H : L] and B := {B x : x G}.

A group-theoretic construction Define Σ := Cos(G, H, HgH), Γ := Cos(G, L, LgL). Γ and Σ are G-symmetric, connected and of valency 4. Let B := [H : L] and B := {B x : x G}. B is a G-invariant partition of V (Γ) = [G : L] such that k = v 2 = 2, Γ B = C 4, Γ[B, C] = K 2,2 and Σ = Γ B.

A group-theoretic construction Define Σ := Cos(G, H, HgH), Γ := Cos(G, L, LgL). Γ and Σ are G-symmetric, connected and of valency 4. Let B := [H : L] and B := {B x : x G}. B is a G-invariant partition of V (Γ) = [G : L] such that k = v 2 = 2, Γ B = C 4, Γ[B, C] = K 2,2 and Σ = Γ B. These are examples of graphs in case (b) with m = 1.

A group-theoretic construction Define Σ := Cos(G, H, HgH), Γ := Cos(G, L, LgL). Γ and Σ are G-symmetric, connected and of valency 4. Let B := [H : L] and B := {B x : x G}. B is a G-invariant partition of V (Γ) = [G : L] such that k = v 2 = 2, Γ B = C 4, Γ[B, C] = K 2,2 and Σ = Γ B. These are examples of graphs in case (b) with m = 1. No example is known in case (b) with m > 1.

A group-theoretic construction Corollary [Li, Praeger, Z] There exists an infinite family of connected symmetric graphs Γ of valency 4 which have a quotient graph Γ B of valency 4 such that Γ is not a cover of Γ B. This is the first (infinite) family of graphs with these properties.

Questions In the case where k = v 2 1 and Γ B is connected, is v bounded by some function of the valency of Simple(Γ B )?

Questions In the case where k = v 2 1 and Γ B is connected, is v bounded by some function of the valency of Simple(Γ B )? Can Γ be determined for small values of m?

Questions In the case where k = v 2 1 and Γ B is connected, is v bounded by some function of the valency of Simple(Γ B )? Can Γ be determined for small values of m? Study the case when Simple(Γ B ) = C v and m is small (e.g. m = 3 in case (a), m = 2, 3 in case (b) and m = 2 in case (c)).