Quantum Optics and Quantum Informatics FKA173

Similar documents
Theoretical design of a readout system for the Flux Qubit-Resonator Rabi Model in the ultrastrong coupling regime

NANOSCALE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Quantize electrical circuits

Superconducting quantum bits. Péter Makk

Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics. Mark David Jenkins Martes cúantico, February 25th, 2014

Dispersive Readout, Rabi- and Ramsey-Measurements for Superconducting Qubits

10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics

Short Course in Quantum Information Lecture 8 Physical Implementations

Light-Matter Interactions

Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics

Superconducting Qubits Lecture 4

Quantum computation with superconducting qubits

Semiconductors: Applications in spintronics and quantum computation. Tatiana G. Rappoport Advanced Summer School Cinvestav 2005

b) (5 points) Give a simple quantum circuit that transforms the state

Superconducting Qubits

Doing Atomic Physics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED

Non-linear driving and Entanglement of a quantum bit with a quantum readout

Quantum Light-Matter Interactions

8 Quantized Interaction of Light and Matter

Distributing Quantum Information with Microwave Resonators in Circuit QED

Superconducting Qubits. Nathan Kurz PHYS January 2007

Superposition of two mesoscopically distinct quantum states: Coupling a Cooper-pair box to a large superconducting island

Requirements for scaleable QIP

10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics

Circuit QED: A promising advance towards quantum computing

Lecture 10 Superconducting qubits: advanced designs, operation 1 Generic decoherence problem: Λ 0 : intended

Lecture 9 Superconducting qubits Ref: Clarke and Wilhelm, Nature 453, 1031 (2008).

Physics 581, Quantum Optics II Problem Set #4 Due: Tuesday November 1, 2016

Felix Kleißler 1,*, Andrii Lazariev 1, and Silvia Arroyo-Camejo 1,** 1 Accelerated driving field frames

INTRODUCTION TO SUPERCONDUCTING QUBITS AND QUANTUM EXPERIENCE: A 5-QUBIT QUANTUM PROCESSOR IN THE CLOUD

Mesoscopic Shelving Readout of Superconducting Qubits in Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics

Quantum optics of many-body systems

Cavity QED with Rydberg Atoms Serge Haroche, Collège de France & Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 5

Quantum computation and quantum information

Perturbative analysis of two-qubit gates on transmon qubits

Strong tunable coupling between a charge and a phase qubit

Supercondcting Qubits

Superconducting Qubits Coupling Superconducting Qubits Via a Cavity Bus

Quantum Gates, Circuits & Teleportation

Driving Qubit Transitions in J-C Hamiltonian

Synthesizing arbitrary photon states in a superconducting resonator

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics of Superconducting Electrical Circuits

Solid State Physics IV -Part II : Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena

Electrical quantum engineering with superconducting circuits

Superconducting qubits (Phase qubit) Quantum informatics (FKA 172)

Quantum Optics and Quantum Informatics 7.5hp (FKA173) Introductory Lecture

QUANTUM THEORY OF LIGHT EECS 638/PHYS 542/AP609 FINAL EXAMINATION

Lecture Notes on QUANTUM COMPUTING STEFANO OLIVARES. Dipartimento di Fisica - Università degli Studi di Milano. Ver. 2.0

EE 223 Applied Quantum Mechanics 2 Winter 2016

Dynamical Casimir effect in superconducting circuits

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 11 Nov 2014

Lecture 4: Postulates of quantum mechanics

Dissipation in Transmon

Supplementary information for Quantum delayed-choice experiment with a beam splitter in a quantum superposition

S.K. Saikin May 22, Lecture 13

Realization of Single Qubit Operations Using. Coherence Vector Formalism in. Quantum Cellular Automata

QUANTUM COMPUTING. Part II. Jean V. Bellissard. Georgia Institute of Technology & Institut Universitaire de France

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Lecture 2, March 2, 2017

1 Measurement and expectation values

Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.supr-con] 30 Aug 2005

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2016 Assignment 3

Introduction to Circuit QED

Quantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED

Supplementary Information for

INTRODUCTION TO NMR and NMR QIP

Quantum Computation with Neutral Atoms Lectures 14-15

Lecture 2, March 1, 2018

i = cos 2 0i + ei sin 2 1i

Mesoscopic field state superpositions in Cavity QED: present status and perspectives

Classical behavior of magnetic dipole vector. P. J. Grandinetti

Motion and motional qubit

Superconducting Circuits and Quantum Information

Short introduction to Quantum Computing

Controlling the Interaction of Light and Matter...

Qubit-photon interactions in a cavity: Measurement-induced dephasing and number splitting

Optimal Controlled Phasegates for Trapped Neutral Atoms at the Quantum Speed Limit

P 3/2 P 1/2 F = -1.5 F S 1/2. n=3. n=3. n=0. optical dipole force is state dependent. n=0

Dipole-coupling a single-electron double quantum dot to a microwave resonator

Single qubit + CNOT gates

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 13 Spins in Magnetic Fields

Quantum Computing Lecture 3. Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Anuj Dawar

quantum mechanics is a hugely successful theory... QSIT08.V01 Page 1

1.0 Introduction to Quantum Systems for Information Technology 1.1 Motivation

Collège de France abroad Lectures Quantum information with real or artificial atoms and photons in cavities

Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing. Sushain Cherivirala. Bits and Qubits

Quantum Information & Quantum Computing. (Experimental Part) Oliver Benson SoSe, 2016

IBM quantum experience: Experimental implementations, scope, and limitations

Hilbert Space, Entanglement, Quantum Gates, Bell States, Superdense Coding.

Supplementary Information

1 Time-Dependent Two-State Systems: Rabi Oscillations

2.0 Basic Elements of a Quantum Information Processor. 2.1 Classical information processing The carrier of information

Josephson qubits. P. Bertet. SPEC, CEA Saclay (France), Quantronics group

CMSC 33001: Novel Computing Architectures and Technologies. Lecture 06: Trapped Ion Quantum Computing. October 8, 2018

Josephson charge qubits: a brief review

State tomography of capacitively shunted phase qubits with high fidelity. Abstract

Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 2018, 5:00 pm. 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet

Circuit quantum electrodynamics : beyond the linear dispersive regime

Transcription:

Quantum Optics and Quantum Informatics FKA173 Date and time: Tuesday, 7 October 015, 08:30-1:30. Examiners: Jonas Bylander (070-53 44 39) and Thilo Bauch (0733-66 13 79). Visits around 09:30 and 11:30. 1. Bloch sphere manipulations (1.5 pts.) (a) Write down a general qubit state and depict it on the Bloch sphere. (0.5) (b) Given two time-dependent fields B z (t) and B x (t) that couple to a qubit, i.e. the Hamiltonian is given by Ĥ = 1 (B x(t) σ x + B z (t) σ z ), describe how to take the qubit from the state 1 to the state ( 0 + 1 ) /. During how long time should the fields be applied? Note: You can use the left hand rule together with the timedependent rotation angle δ = 1 t 0 dt B (t ) around the field axis. Keep in mind that you can change the fields along x and z direction independently. (1). Rabi Hamiltonian and Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian (5.5 pts.) (a) The Rabi Hamiltonian of an atom in presence of an external electromagnetic field is given by Ĥ = ˆP m + V (r) + eˆr E(t) = Ĥ0 ˆd E(t), where ˆd = eˆr is the dipole operator. What approximation is used to derive this Hamiltonian? (0.5) (b) The Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian can be derived from the Rabi Hamiltonian by replacing the classical field E(t) of a single mode in a one dimensional cavity (resonator) by an operator Ê(t) = Êx(z, t) = E 0 (â + â ) sin (kz), resulting in Ĥ = ω 0 σ z + ωâ â + g(âσ + + â σ ). 1

What are the meanings of the three terms in the Hamiltonian? (0.5) What approximation was used to derive this Hamiltonian and what is the physical meaning of this approximation? (0.5) In the two-dimensional subspace spanned by e n and g n+1, the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian looks like Ĥ n = ω ( n + 1 ) ˆ1 (ω 0 ω) σ z + g n + 1σ x, where e and g are respectively the excited and ground state of the atom, and n is the photon number state. Derive the Eigenenergies of the Hamiltonian for zero detuning ω = ω 0 and depict the energy spectrum of the uncoupled (g = 0) and coupled (g 0) atom-photon states. Put the relevant energy differences into the drawings. Note: The eigenvalues λ ± of a matrix can be found from ( a11 λ ±) ( a λ ±) a 1 a 1 = 0, where a 11, a are the diagonal and a 1, a 1 the off-diagonal elements of the matrix. (1.5) (c) For large detuning ( = ω 0 ω, g) between the field frequency and the atomic transition frequency we obtain the dispersive Hamiltonian: Ĥ disp = 1 ) ) ( ω 0 + g σ z + ( ω g σ z â â. What is the effective frequency of the cavity when the atom (the qubit) is in the ground state? (0.5) This system can be used to read out the qubit state using (microwave) photons. Explain explicitly how the system should be modified, what is measured and how the qubit state can be detected. (1) Describe the nature of the back-action on the qubit during this dispersive readout. Motivate your answer with reference to the dispersive Hamiltonian. (1)

3. Ramsey fringes, mixed states and the Bloch equations (5 pts.) Let a qubit start out in the ground state, and apply a sequence of two π/ pulses separated by a time τ of free induction, followed by a projective measurement onto the energy eigenbasis. The lab-frame Hamiltonian is the same as that in question 1. Figure 1 shows the probability to find a qubit in the ground state after this sequence (Ramsey fringes). Figure 1: Ramsey interference fringes (superconducting qubit). P sw denotes the probability to find the qubit in its ground state when measuring after the second pulse (indicated by the red dot). (a) Explain why the signal decays toward 0.5. What is the relevant characteristic time scale usually called, and how long is this characteristic time here? Explain why the signal does not initially swing between 0 and +1, but only between approximately 0. and 0.9. () (b) Write down the Bloch equations for a spin-1/, ṙ = r B(t) r z r 0 ẑ r xˆx + r y ŷ, T 1 T for the average projections onto the x, y, and z axes (Bloch vector), starting right after the first π/ pulse, i.e. at time t π/ when the qubit state is on the equator. You can assume that the pulse was along the x axis, so that the state points along the y axis at this moment in time. Solve the Bloch equations for the time τ of free-induction decay, i.e. until right before the second π/ pulse. Illustrate your results in the Bloch sphere. (You can make an Ansatz for the form of the solution and then verify it. It s ok to assume resonant pulses.) () (c) Write down the density matrix for the times (i) before the first π/ pulse; (ii) after the first π/ pulse; and (iii) at time τ. Is the state pure or mixed at the times (i iii)? (1) 3

4. Quantizing Electrical Circuits (3.5 pts.) Derive the quantum mechanical Hamiltonian of the single Cooper-pair box, starting from the electrical circuit in the figure. Here the tunnel junction is a parallel combination of a capacitance C J and a Josephson ) junction with flux dependent potential energy E JJ = E J cos (π ΦΦ0, where E J is a constant and Φ the flux across the junction and Φ 0 = h/(e) the superconducting flux quantum. Figure : Circuit diagram of the single Cooper-pair box (a) Write down the classical Lagrangian L(Φ, Φ) for the circuit. Note: First write the Lagrangian, i.e. kinetic energy minus potential energy, in branch flux representation and then rewrite the Lagrangian in node flux representation making use of Kirchhoff s relations (constraints).(1.5) (b) Find the conjugate momentum to the coordinate you chose, and motivate the choice of coordinate. Note: The conjugate momentum of the flux Φ is given by the charge q = L/ Φ. (0.5) (c) Write down the classical Hamiltonian for the circuit. Note: Use the Legendre transformation to obtain the Hamiltonian: H(Φ n, q n ) = n Φ n q n L (0.5) (d) Going to quantum mechanics, what are the commutation relations between all the operators in the Hamiltonian? (0.5) (e) The quantized Hamiltonian, expressed in charge basis, is given by: Ĥ = n 4E C (n n g ) n n E J ( n n + 1 + n + 1 n ), with E C = e /(C Σ ) the Coulomb energy of a single electron on the island and C Σ = C J + C g the island capacitance to ground. Truncate the Hamiltonian to a two-level system and write it using Pauli matrices. (0.5) 4

5. Quantum circuits and algorithms (6 pts.) (a) Show that for the controlled-z operation on two qubits (see Fig. 3), the outcome is the same regardless of which qubit controls which. (1) Figure 3: Controlled-Z gate. (b) Construct a CNOT gate (see Fig. 4) from one controlled-z gate and two Hadamard gates, specifying control and target qubits. (1) Figure 4: Controlled-NOT gate. (c) The quantum teleportion circuit is shown in Fig. 5. Explain what happens throughout this algorithm. Explicitely write out the states Ψ 0, Ψ 1, and Ψ. Explain how Bob obtains the output state, based on the measurement results m and n. (.5) A L I C E 0 From Alice to Bob Η Η m n B O B 0 Alice creates a Bell pair Ψ Ψ 1 Ψ 0 σ m x Figure 5: Quantum teleportation circuit. σ n z From Alice to Bob (d) The Bell states are the maximally entangled two-qubit states. Explain what this means. Demonstrate that the CNOT is an entangling gate by calculating the reduced density matrix for one of the qubits in a Bell pair Ψ, (1.5) 1 ˆρ 1 = Tr( ˆρ ) = j Ψ Ψ j. j=0 5