J. Sandweiss Yale University

Similar documents
C A SPECTROMETER FOR MEASURING INELASTIC SECONDARIES FROM 200 GeV Ie, p-p COLLISIONS. T. O. White National Accelerator Laboratory

C In other study groups large spark-chamber magnets have been 1 2 These magnets are to be used as triggered ''bubble chambers"

NEPTUN-A Spectrometer for measuring the Spin Analyzing Power in p-p elastic scattering at large P~ at 400 GeV (and 3 TeV) at UNK.

Status of GEp III high Q form factor ratio analysis. Andrew Puckett, MIT on behalf of the GEp III Collaboration

A ON THE USE OF A HYBRID BUBBLE CHAMBER IN THE 100-BeV REGION. W. D. Walker University of Wisconsin ABSTRACT

Fall Quarter 2010 UCSB Physics 225A & UCSD Physics 214 Homework 1

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

S1: Particle Equations of Motion S1A: Introduction: The Lorentz Force Equation

IPBI-TN June 30, 2004

APPENDIX E SPIN AND POLARIZATION

PHY-494: Applied Relativity Lecture 5 Relativistic Particle Kinematics

Theory English (Official)

Geant4 Simulation of the Beam Line for the HARP Experiment. M.Gostkin, A.Jemtchougov, E.Rogalev (JINR, Dubna)

The FLUKA study of the secondary particles fluence in the AD-Antiproton Decelerator target area.

LONG-SPILL MUON AND NEUTRINO BEAMS IN AREA I. T. Kirk Harvard University ABSTRACT

Tagging with Roman Pots at RHIC. Proton tagging at STAR

The Detector Design of the Jefferson Lab EIC

QGP Physics from Fixed Target to LHC

MESON AREA 1000 GeV STUDY. C. N. Brown, A. L. Read, A. A. Wehmann Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory

Spin observables for polarizing antiprotons. Donie O Brien

COMPASS Drell-Yan. Michela Chiosso, University of Torino and INFN. TMD ECT* Workshop April 2016

2.24 Simulation Study of K L Beam: K L Rates and Background Ilya Larin Department of Physics Old Dominion University Norfolk, VA 23529, U.S.A.

Midterm Solutions. 1 1 = 0.999c (0.2)

A beam line for schools

Measurements of unpolarized azimuthal asymmetries. in SIDIS at COMPASS

The Neutral-Particle Spectrometer

Spacal alignment and calibration

Timelike Compton Scattering

Lecture 6 Scattering theory Partial Wave Analysis. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

A method to polarise antiprotons in storage rings and create polarised antineutrons

The Jefferson Lab 12 GeV Program

MASS OF THE TOP QUARK

JLEIC forward detector design and performance

A Summary of Ξ ο Physics at KTEV. Erik J. Ramberg Fermilab 2 December, 2005

Lecture 11. Weak interactions

FUTURE SPIN EXPERIMENTS AT SLAC

Overview of Acceleration

Physics with Tagged Forward Protons using the STAR Detector at RHIC. The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider The pp2pp Experiment STAR 2009

The reaction p(e,e'p)π 0 to calibrate the Forward and the Large Angle Electromagnetic Shower Calorimeters


Donie O Brien Nigel Buttimore

Overview of recent HERMES results

BUBBLE CHAMBER EXPERIMENTS. December Technical Report Prepared Under Contract AT(O4-3)-515 for the USAEC San Francisco Operations Office

Measurement of Properties of Electroweak Bosons with the DØ Detector

Polarization Preservation and Control in a Figure-8 Ring

Evaluating the Emittance Increase Due to the RF Coupler Fields

PoS(DIS2018)216. W Measurement at PHENIX. Chong Kim

Chiral filtering of spin states as a source of SSA. S.M. Troshin and N.E. Tyurin

1 The pion bump in the gamma reay flux

arxiv:nucl-th/ v1 3 Jul 1996

COMPASS Measurements of Asymmetry Amplitudes in the Drell-Yan Process Observed from Scattering Pions off a Transversely Polarized Proton Target

Lepton beam polarisation for the HERA experiments ZEUS and H1

A STRONG INTERACTIONS IN THE 25-FT BUBBLE CHAMBER. G. Trilling Lawrence Radiation Laboratory

Time-like Compton Scattering with transversely polarized target

Polarimetry Options for E160

Longitudinal Double Spin Asymmetry in Inclusive Jet Production at STAR

Nucleon Spin. Tyler Corbett

Test of T and CP Violation in Leptonic Decay of. Yung Su Tsai. Stanford University, Stanford, California ABSTRACT

A N t

J-PARC E07 Ξ - Junya Yoshida (Advanced Science Research Center, JAEA) On behalf of J-PARC E07 Collaboration K + K - X -

$)ODW%HDP(OHFWURQ6RXUFHIRU/LQHDU&ROOLGHUV

Measurement of Collins Asymmetries in the inclusive production of hadron pairs

Zeeman Effect - Lab exercises 24

SMALL ANGLE PION FLUX PRODUCED IN A THICK BERYLLIUM BY HIGH ENERGY ELECTRONS*

Positron-Electron Annihilation

On the determination of the longitudinal. component of the fragmentation function of the. N.B.Skachkov, O.G.Smirnova, L.G.Tkatchev.

Charged current DIS with polarised e ± beams at HERA. Alex Tapper

Examples for experiments that can be done at the T9 beam line

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 15 Apr 2016

Single Spin Asymmetries on proton at COMPASS

09.lec Momentum Spread Effects in Bending and Focusing*

S9: Momentum Spread Effects and Bending S9A: Formulation

Discovery of antiproton

Brown University PHYS 0060 Physics Department LAB B -190

Nucleon Spin Structure Longitudinal Spin of the Proton. HUGS Summer School Jefferson National Laboratory June 2, 2011 Lecture 5

PANDA Experiment. Nordic Winter Meeting on FAIR Björkliden Department of Physics and Astronomy Uppsala University

DESY Summer Students Program 2008: Exclusive π + Production in Deep Inelastic Scattering

Differential Cross Section Measurements in Ion-molecule Collisions

Information about the T9 beam line and experimental facilities

Jet reconstruction in LHCb searching for Higgs-like particles

Gluon Polarisation COMPASS

CERN / LHCC Addendum to ALICE TDR 8 24 April 2002 A L I C E. Addendum. to the. Technical Design Report. of the. Time of Flight System (TOF)

Polarimetry. POSIPOL 2011 Beijing Peter Schuler (DESY) - Polarimetry

Time-like Compton Scattering with transversely polarized target

LIS section meeting. PS2 design status. Y. Papaphilippou. April 30 th, 2007

(Total for Question = 5 marks) PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com

Cross Section of Exclusive π Electro-production from Neutron. Jixie Zhang (CLAS Collaboration) Old Dominion University Sep. 2009

SPIN STRUCTURE OF THE NUCLEON AND POLARIZATION. Charles Y. Prescott Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University, Stanford CA 94309

Measurement of wakefields in hollow plasma channels Carl A. Lindstrøm (University of Oslo)

The Longitudinal Photon, Transverse Nucleon, Single-Spin Asymmetry in Exclusive Pion Production

Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam

PoS(DIS 2010)058. ATLAS Forward Detectors. Andrew Brandt University of Texas, Arlington

Beam Diagnostics Lecture 3. Measuring Complex Accelerator Parameters Uli Raich CERN AB-BI

Search for Gluonic Excitations with GlueX at Jefferson Lab

Λ and Λ polarization at COMPASS

67. W.M. Snow et al. (M. Sarsour), NSR collaboration, Parity violating neutron spin rotation in He-4 and H., Nuovo Cim. C035N04, (2012).

S2E: Solenoidal Focusing

S2E: Solenoidal Focusing

High-t Meson Photoproduction: Experimental Capabilities

Tertiary particle production and target optimization of the H2 beam line in

Transcription:

-1 - SS-12 225 A POLARZED PROTON BEAM FROM 11. DECAY O. E. Overseth University of Michigan and J. Sandweiss Yale University ABSTRACT 5 We show how beams of high-energy protons with intensities -1 protons per pulse and with transverse and longitudinal polarization each as high as 5% can be produced from 11. decay. The transverse and longitudinal component are variable, and can be calculated from the kinematics of 11.. Beams of similarly polarized anti 3 protons should also be available with intensities - 1 per pulse. t will be very important to study spin dependence of proton interactions at the higher energies that become available at the 2-GeV accelerator. Prevailing theoretical opinions expect the spin dependence to vanish at sufficiently high energies. n order to investigate these questions, it would be very desirable to have a relatively intense beam of protons polarized both transversely and longitudinally. Since anticipated spin-dependence effects may be small, it would be particularly valuable if the proton polarization were known. Otherwise the polarization of the beam must be determined by a second scatter or interaction sensitive to the spin dependence. A null effect at the second scatter leaves undetermined whether the beam was unpolarized or if there is a lack of spin dependence (1. e., no analyzing power) at the second scatterer. A positive effect, e. g., a left-right scattering asymmetry, indicates beam polarization, but separate experiments must be performed to calibrate the analyzing power of the scattering material. t is the intent of this note to show how beams of high-energy protons, with in 5 tensities -1 protons per pulse, with transverse and longitudinal polarization compo nents each as high as 5/, can be produced from 11. decay. Moreover, the transverse and longitudinal components are variable, and can be calculated from the kinematics of 11. decay. Beams of similarily polarized anti-protons should also be available by -27

-2- SS-i2 reversing magnet polarities. Crude estimates give polarized antiproton intensities of 3 - i per pulse. POLARZED DECAY PROTONS A treatment of the polarization resulting from hyperon decay has been given in a i separate paper which reviews various possibilities for producing polarized protons at the 2-GeV accelerator. f the hyperons are not produced polarized, selection of the decay protons for limited intervals of decay angles and momenta will result in both transverse and longitudinally polarized protons. These polarization components will be proportional to the hyperon decay parameter cr. the proportionality coefficient depending on the angular interval selected; /1. decay is an excellent choice since the a decay parameter is large (a/l. =.65), it is convenient to work in a neutral beam, and neutral beams at the 2-GeV accelerator should provide prolific SOurces of /1. hyperons. Protons selected from one hemisphere, for example from the left of the hyperon beam line, will have a transverse polarization in that direction equal to a l Z, transverse polarization can be increased by selecting from limited regions of azimuthal angle and center-of-mass angle. Longitudinal polarization results from discriminating This between protons that decay forward versus backward in the hyperon center-of-mass, i. e., selecting the fast decay protons from the slow. As examples, consider two cases. n the first, if we select protons corresponding to center-of-mass decay interval of 2-5', and a quadrant of azimuth (for example 45' above and below the horizontal to left of hyperon beam), the protons will have a 34"1 horizontal transverse component of polarization and a 5"1 longitudinal component. The decay solid angle in hyperon center-of-mass selected is.i5" sterad. For the second case, consider the same quadrant of azimuth but a center-of-mass interval 6' to f2. This results in 55'7 transverse polarization and no longitudinal polarization. The solid angle for this case is.5" sterad. By appropriate choices of angle intervals in principle one can select protons with a large range of polarization components.. POLARZED PROTONS FROM /. -DECAY To realize such polarized beams we propose selecting protons from /1. decay with a magnetic lens system which deflects and focuses the decay protons into a usable beam. The capability of the system to select polarization components is based on two important considerations. First of all, in a region where the momentum spectrum is rapidly decreasing (or increasing) a given interval of proton momenta has a strong correspondence to a center-of-mass decay angle interval and also to laboratory decay angle interval. This effect is enhanced by the center-of-mass to laboratory transformation which concentrates (in lab angle) the forward decay hemisphere much more than -28

-3-88-12 the backward hemisphere. Thus a magnetic system that focuses protons of some ","p about a central p will be selecting a decay center-of-mass interval. The second important feature of such a lens system is that angles into the system become transformed to points on the focal plane of the system. Thus a slit on the focal plane selects protons from a certain laboratory decay angular interval and hence with given components of transverse and longitudinal polarization. We will elaborate further on each of these two features. To illustrate how a combination of momentum and angle selection sets the centerof-mass interval, consider that we wish to have a beam of t6 GeV/c polarized protons and that our magnet system selects this momentum with a ","pip ~ ± 5%. The momentum spectrum of A O produced at O by 2-GeV protons can be expected from Hagedorn Ranft calculations to peak at about 12 GeV/c and falls off rapidly beyond 16 GeV/c. To produce protons in our desired momentum interval requires A, s of greater than 16 GeV e. From 16 GeV c to 18 Ge Vc A hyperons all protons in the momentum interval specified are produced from O to 9 in the center-of-mass. Because of the rapid falloff of the A momentum less than 1% of the A, s with momentum exceeding 16 GeV c are in the 18-2 GeV e interval. f now we select a laboratory decay angle interval of.2 ±.8 (by position and width of slit at focal point of magnetic lens system), we will further limit the decays in the center-of-mass to be between 2-5. This results in polarizations calculated above in the example. Or if we select those protons in the ± 5% momentum interval about 16 GeV c with laboratory decay angles exceeding.3 (maximum is -.4 ) we cover the center-of-mass interval 6-12 of the second example for which polarization was calculated above. n this way a combination of momentum and angle selection can result in protons from decays in a given center-of-mass interval. This polarized proton scheme is conveniently realized in a neutral beam such as discussed in another 1969 Summer Study Report. 2 The basic scheme of the magnetic system is illustrated in Fig. 1, which is self-explanatory. The requirements on the quadrupole lens have not been worked out in detail but appear to be well within current practice. t is perhaps worth noting that this technique of selecting angles by collimation in the focal plane has been successfully carried out in several other existing beams. n particular the rf separated beam at the AG8 uses a similar arrangement in its "stopper section" which is capable of selecting angles to -.1 mrad. 3. ANTCPATED RATE8 We consider briefly again the question of rates. Our basic assumptions for A production are discussed in Ref. 2. We recall that the solid angle accepted from the 8 production target is limited to 1- steradians in order for the initial direction of the

-4- SS-12 A to be sufficiently well defined for the above technique. We give the optimisitc estimate first. The number of protons is: N = N x (fraction decaying in 1 m ) x (fraction of protons accepted) p AO N 1.6 X 1 8 x 2/3 X O.h P 4~ (approximate value for (typical rather pessimistic 16 GeV/c) fraction, see text) Therefore 6 12 N =2.7 x 1 protons of -16 GeV/c per 3 X 1 interacting protons. p The pessimistic number is down by a factor of 3: 5 12 N "1 protons of 16 GeV / c per 3 x 1 interacting protons. p We anticipate A to be -1% of A production, so corresponding p (polarized) 3 4 fluxes range from 1 to 3 x 1 p's per pulse. Momenta from -1 GeV/c to -16 GeV / c will have comparable fluxes. We comment that the "purity" of the proton beam can be determined experimentally by adding sufficient apparatus to detect and measure the direction of the rr- from the A decay. One can then see what fraction of the protons in the beam indeed originate from A decay. With careful collimation and beam design, it seerns possible to essentially eliminate non-a protons. We conclude that the system provides intensities of uniquely determined polarized protons sufficient for many of the possible scattering experiments. Particularly when used with polarized targets, a large range of polarization phenomena at these high energies can be investigated. * REFERENCES 1. E. Overseth, Polarized Protons at the 2-GeV Accelerator, National Accelerator Laboratory 1969 Summer Study Report SS-118, Vol. l. 2J. Sandweiss and O. E. Overseth, A High ntensity Y-, s" Beam, National Accelerator Laboratory 1969 Summer Study Report (unpublished). 3Foelsche et al., Rev. Sci. lnstr.~, 879 (1967). " An experiment to measure the degree of polarization of a proton beam from A -decay has been run at Argonne by M. L. Good, Y. Y. Lee, and D. Reeder. The results are not yet available. -3

.., '" Typical Decoy Proton Decoy Region ~"'O meters--j ~ - \, Quod. Lens Bending Focal Length f Magnet fj Jj '",, \ Slit Subsequent Optical System Fig. 1. Production of a polarized proton beam from the decay of lambdas..., N Cl Cl o