Holography of BGG-Solutions

Similar documents
From holonomy reductions of Cartan geometries to geometric compactifications

Conformal and CR Geometry from the Parabolic Viewpoint

Quaternionic Complexes

Conformal geometry and twistor theory

A relative version of Kostant s theorem

OVERDETERMINED SYSTEMS, CONFORMAL DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, AND THE BGG COMPLEX

Invariant calculus for parabolic geometries

Higher symmetries of the system /D

Conformally invariant differential operators

H-projective structures and their applications

TWISTOR AND KILLING FORMS IN RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

Infinitesimal Einstein Deformations. Kähler Manifolds

ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES. 1. Introduction

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries

Subcomplexes in Curved BGG Sequences

How to recognize a conformally Kähler metric

How to recognise a conformally Einstein metric?

Projective parabolic geometries

Spin(10,1)-metrics with a parallel null spinor and maximal holonomy

Background on c-projective geometry

Holonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. Mathematics Colloquium School of Mathematics and Physics The University of Queensland. October 31, 2011 May 28, 2012

Parallel and Killing Spinors on Spin c Manifolds. 1 Introduction. Andrei Moroianu 1

C-PROJECTIVE COMPACTIFICATION; (QUASI )KÄHLER METRICS AND CR BOUNDARIES

Self-dual conformal gravity

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

Holonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. School of Mathematical Sciences Colloquium University of Adelaide, May 7, /15

Moduli spaces of Type A geometries EGEO 2016 La Falda, Argentina. Peter B Gilkey

Research Article New Examples of Einstein Metrics in Dimension Four

A COMPLEX FROM LINEAR ELASTICITY. Michael Eastwood

Reduction of Homogeneous Riemannian structures

The X-ray transform on projective space

Manifolds with holonomy. Sp(n)Sp(1) SC in SHGAP Simon Salamon Stony Brook, 9 Sep 2016

Theorem 2. Let n 0 3 be a given integer. is rigid in the sense of Guillemin, so are all the spaces ḠR n,n, with n n 0.

Left-invariant Einstein metrics

Recent developments in pseudo-riemannian holonomy theory

Mostow Rigidity. W. Dison June 17, (a) semi-simple Lie groups with trivial centre and no compact factors and

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 2 Dec 2014

Alternative mechanism to SUSY

Conformal Killing forms on Riemannian manifolds

The Erlangen Program and General Relativity

Special Conformal Invariance

Geometric Structures in Mathematical Physics Non-existence of almost complex structures on quaternion-kähler manifolds of positive type

Conification of Kähler and hyper-kähler manifolds and supergr

The gap phenomenon in parabolic geometries

WEYL STRUCTURES FOR PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES

Minimal surfaces in quaternionic symmetric spaces

Bondi mass of Einstein-Maxwell-Klein-Gordon spacetimes

Representation theory and the X-ray transform

First structure equation

Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups

arxiv: v2 [math.dg] 18 Jun 2014

ARCHIVUM MATHEMATICUM (BRNO) Tomus 42 (2006), Supplement,

Two simple ideas from calculus applied to Riemannian geometry

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

Compact Riemannian manifolds with exceptional holonomy

η = (e 1 (e 2 φ)) # = e 3

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky

1 v >, which will be G-invariant by construction.

Alternative mechanism to SUSY (Conservative extensions of the Poincaré group)

ALMOST COMPLEX PROJECTIVE STRUCTURES AND THEIR MORPHISMS

Equivalence, Invariants, and Symmetry

Representation theory and the X-ray transform

arxiv:alg-geom/ v1 29 Jul 1993

Complete integrability of geodesic motion in Sasaki-Einstein toric spaces

Symmetries of Parabolic Geometries

The Fueter Theorem and Dirac symmetries

arxiv: v2 [math.dg] 22 Oct 2008

Twistor constructions of quaternionic manifolds and asymptotically hyperbolic Einstein Weyl spaces. Aleksandra Borówka. University of Bath

class # MATH 7711, AUTUMN 2017 M-W-F 3:00 p.m., BE 128 A DAY-BY-DAY LIST OF TOPICS

Physics 557 Lecture 5

A Bird Eye s view: recent update to Extremal metrics

RICCI SOLITONS ON COMPACT KAHLER SURFACES. Thomas Ivey

Transverse geometry. consisting of finite sums of monomials of the form

Global aspects of Lorentzian manifolds with special holonomy

Holographic renormalization and reconstruction of space-time. Kostas Skenderis Southampton Theory Astrophysics and Gravity research centre

Invariant differential operators on the sphere

Sp(3) STRUCTURES ON 14-DIMENSIONAL MANIFOLDS

Variable separation and second order superintegrability

Introduction to supersymmetry

VINCENT PECASTAING. University of Luxembourg, Mathematics Research Unit Maison du nombre, 6 avenue de la Fonte L-4364 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg 1

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 30 Aug 2018

Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS

Geometric inequalities for black holes

Anti self dual fields and manifolds

Argument shift method and sectional operators: applications to differential geometry

Differential Geometry MTG 6257 Spring 2018 Problem Set 4 Due-date: Wednesday, 4/25/18

The Erwin Schrödinger International Boltzmanngasse 9 Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria

EINSTEIN METRICS. Andrzej Derdzinski. The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. August 8, 2009

Vladimir S. Matveev (Jena) Degrees of mobility of projective and h-projective structures:

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

The X-ray transform: part II

CR EMBEDDED SUBMANIFOLDS OF CR MANIFOLDS

Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 2 Oct 2015

COHOMOGENEITY ONE EINSTEIN-SASAKI 5-MANIFOLDS

Stress-energy tensor is the most important object in a field theory and have been studied

1: Lie groups Matix groups, Lie algebras

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

Transcription:

Matthias Hammerl University of Greifswald January 2016 - Srní Winter School Geometry and Physics Joint work with Travis Willse (University of Vienna)

Introductory picture: Holography of solutions Let M = M 0 M be a (real-analytic) Poincaré-Einstein manifold: (M 0, c) is a conformal n-dimensional space. (M, g ) an Einstein metric with Ric(g ) = ng. (M 0, c) is the conformal infinity of (M, g ). Our goal is to relate overdetermined differential equations on M with corresponding equations on the conformal infinity M 0 :

Conformally invariant overdetermined Equations on (M 0, c) Conformally invariant overdeterimend equations on the boundary (M 0, c) are governed by first BGG-operators Examples are: Θ 0 : Γ(H 0 ) Γ(H 1 ). Conformally-Einstein equation: The equation governing the existence of an Einstein-metric in the conformal class: Conformal Killing form equation: D c ϕ a1 a k = D [a0 ϕ a1 a k ] + Twistor spinor equation: tf(d a D b σ + P ab σ) = 0. k n k + 1 g c[a 1 g pq D p ϕ q a2 a k ] D c χ + 1 n γ cd/ χ = 0.

Projectively invariant overdetermined Equations on (M, g ) We regard overdetermined equations on the Riemannian structure (M, g ) which are projectively invariant and are therefore governed by first BGG-operators Θ 0 : Γ(H 0 ) Γ(H 1 ) of the projective structure p spanned by the Levi-Civita covariant derivative D of g. Examples are: Projectively-Ricci-flat equation: The equation governing the existence of a Ricci-flat affine connection in the projective class of the Levi-Civita-connection D: Killing form equation: Killing spinor equation: D α D β σ + σp αβ = 0 D γ ϕ α1 α k = D [α0 ϕ α1 α k ] Holography of BGG-Solutions D α χ = λγ α χ for some λ R.

Ambient approach to holography The conformal structure c can be understood as the ray-bundle C that consists of all metrics in the given conformal class. For n odd and c real-analytic, the Fefferman-Graham ambient metric g is a Ricci-flat signature (n + 1, 1) metric on an n + 2 dimensional ambient space M = C ( 1, 1). Since the ambient metric construction is natural, we obtain a (first, trivial) categorical holographic correspondence between symmetries: conformal Killing field ξ on M 0 Killing field ξ of g.

Klein-Einstein Instead of working with Poincaré-Einstein structures, it will be useful for our purposes to work with the closely related class of Klein-Einstein structures, which are more directly related to Fefferman-Graham ambient metrics: (Fefferman-Graham, 2011; Čap-Gover-H., 2012) Let M = M + M 0 M be a (real-analytic) Klein-Einstein manifold: (M 0, c) is a conformal n-dimensional space. (M +, g + ) an Einstein metric with Ric(g + ) = ng +. (M, g ) an Einstein metric with Ric(g ) = ng. (M 0, c) is the projective infinity of (M, g ).

Relationship between Poincaré-Einstein and Klein-Einstein One has that even Poincaré-Einstein structures correspond to Klein-Einstein structures via a change of variables (Fefferman-Graham, 2011).

Klein-Einstein manifolds as projective structures Let M be an n +1-dimensional manifold endowed with a projective structure p whose normal projective tractor connection T preserves a signature (n+1, 1) tractor metric g. Equivalently, the projective holonomy is reduced to Hol(p) SO(n + 1, 1) SL(n + 2). Via the general curved orbit decomposition ([Čap-Gover-H], 2014) for holonomy reduced structures, one obtains (generically) a decomposition of M with properites as above into curved SO(n + 1, 1)-orbits (M +, g + ) (M 0, c) (M, g ) :

Cone construction over a Klein-Einstein manifold Thomas cone construction: The projective n + 1-dimensional structure (M, p) can be equivalently encoded as a canonical Ricci-flat connection on an n + 2-dimensional cone M over M. Metric cone: The (sub-)cone C M over the conformal piece M 0 M can be identified with the metric cone formed by the conformal class of metrics c. Metric on M: The signature (n + 1, 1) parallel tractor metric g gives rise to a -parallel metric g of the same signature on M.

Fefferman-Graham ambient space The Thomas cone over a Klein-Einstein structure thus provides a concrete realisation of: A Fefferman-Graham ambient space M with Ricci-flat, -parallel Fefferman-Graham ambient metric g. The Klein-Einstein structure (M, p) is an equivalent description of an (abstract) ambient space ( M, g). Holography of BGG-Solutions

Holonomies It was shown in (Čap-Gover-Graham-H. 2015) that infinitesimal ambient holonomy = infinitesimal conformal holonomy, which can be expressed in our (projective Klein-Einstein, abstract ambient - setting) as: inf.hol. M 0 x 0 ( conf ) = inf.hol. M x 0 ( proj ) so(n + 1, 1) at each point x 0 M 0 This infinitsimal holonomy subalgebra is naturally isomorphic to infinitesimal ambient holonomy inf.hol. M( ). Since our structure is real analytic: Infinitesimal holonomy is already the full (Lie algebraic) holonomy, which generates (at least locally at every point) the full holonomy. In particular, infinitesimal holonomy is the same (or naturally isomorphic) at every point.

Relationships between BGG-Solutions on M 0, M Let V be an (irreducible) SL(n + 2)-representation and V V a SO(n + 1, 1)-submodule. Examples are: V = V = R n+2 V = so(n + 1, 1), V = sl(n + 2) V = V = Λ k+1 R n+2 V = S 2 0 Rn+2, V = S 2 R n+2. By general tractor machinery and holonomy principles: V gives rise to a conformal tractor bundle V endowed with normal tractor connection V for (M 0, c), defined along M 0. V gives rise to a projective tractor bundle V endowed with normal tractor connection V on (M, p) Since (M, p) has holonmy reduced to SO(n + 1, 1), V is globally defined on M, and then respective projective/conformal tractor connections on this bundle agree along M 0 (Čap-Gover-H., 2012). Holography of BGG-Solutions

BGG-Solutions Via the general principles of the BGG-machinery (Čap-Slovak-Souček, 2001): (V, V ) gives rise to a conformally invariant (first) BGG-operator Θ 0. (V, V ) gives rise to a projectively invariant (first) BGG-operator Θ 0. Normal solutions of the first BGG-operator Θ 0 resp. Θ 0 are defined as parallel sections of V resp. V: V parallel sections Π 0 L 0 {normal solutions} ker Θ V 0 For general solutions, one can employ the HSSŠ- prolongation connection ˆ V (H.-Somberg-Souček-Šilhan, 2012): ˆ V parallel sections Π 0 L 0 Holography of BGG-Solutions ker Θ V 0

General Restriction & Extension for Normal BGG-Solutions Since the connections V resp. V are induced from the normal conformal resp. projective tractor connections, infinitesimal holonomies agree again: inf.hol. M 0 x 0 ( V ) = inf.hol. M x ( V ) (x 0 M 0, x M ). It follows in particular that { V paralllel sections on M 0 } = { V parallel sections of type V on M } and thus ker nor Θ V 0 = ker nor,v Θ V 0, and we have 1 : 1-correspondence between normal solutions of type V on the interior and normal solutions on the boundary.

Examples For some very simple classes of BGG-equations, every solution is normal, and in particular the correspondences between solutions can be considered: V M M0 M R n+2 Parallel field Einstein metric g E in c Ricci-flat affine connection projectively equivalent to D g n+1,1 Parallel spinor twistor spinor χ Killing spinor χ We next discuss the case V = V = Λ k+1, which is the first interesting case of a BGG-operator with (generally) non-normal solutions. The corresponding solutions are conformal Killing forms on M 0 resp. Killing forms on M 0.

Prolongations of Projective / Conformal Killing Forms According to (H.-Somberg-Souček-Šilhan, 2012), one has {Killing forms} = ker Θ 0 = { ˆ parallel tractors} where ˆ = + Ψ is the prolongation connection of this BGG-equation with Ψ the prolongation modification of the normal tractor connection. Simple explicit formula available. Similarly, one has {Conformal Killing forms} = ker Θ 0 = { ˆ parallel tractors}, where ˆ = + Ψ is the prolongation connection of this BGG-equation with Ψ the prolongation modification of the normal tractor connection. Explicit formula available. (Gover-Šilhan 2008; HSSŠ, 2012)

Comparison of projective and conformal prolongation connections Since the projective prolongation connection ˆ is defined on all of M, we can in particular restrict it to a linear connection ˆ M0 on conformal tractors in Λ k+1 T along M 0. A conformal tractor s Λ k+1 T is parallel with respect to the restricted, projective prolongaton connection ˆ M0 if and only if the following conditions hold: Θ 0 (ϕ) = 0 pq (ckf) Cc[a 2 σ pq a3 a k ] = 0,.... (I) This is the conformal Killing equation ckf together with an additional integrability condition (I). In particular, the restriction of the projective prolongation connection ˆ to M 0 does not coincide with the conformal prolongation connection ˆ.

Restriction process: ϕ ϕ The projective prolongation connection ˆ = + Ψ of the (projective) Killing form equation on M can be equivalently described by a suitable/corresponding ambient prolongation connection ˆ. Let ϕ α1 α k be a Killing form of g on M. 1 One regards the corresponding tractor as a suitably ambient prolongation connection ˆ -parallel (multi-vector-)field s, 2 restricts this field to C, 3 and obtains (via the obove comparison of prolongation connections) a conformal Killing form ϕ a1 a k on M 0 satisfying additional integrability conditions (I).

Extension process: φ φ Conversely, let ϕ a1 a k be a conformal Killing form on M 0 satisfying (I). 1 Let s Γ C (Λ k+1 T M) be the corresponding ambient field defined along C. 2 By the above comparison of prolongation connections, s is parallel with respect to the ambient prolongation connection ˆ along C in C-directions. 3 It is shown via an infinitesimal holonomy-computation that one obtains a global ˆ -parallel ambient field s. 4 In particular, since ˆ governs the (projective) Killing form equation globally on M, we obtain (via restriction), a Killing form ϕ α1 α k on M.

Summary of BGG-Relationships M 0 Einstein metric g E in c Ricci-flat affine connection projectively equivalent to D g conformal Killing form ϕ satisfying (I) Killing form ϕ twistor spinor χ Killing spinor χ M For k = 1 (I) is always satisfied and we recover the (categorical) relationship between conformal Killing fields ξ on M 0 and Killing fields ξ of g on M. All respective objects correspond to parallel fields on ambient space M. Holography of BGG-Solutions