The Hashemite University Department of Civil Engineering ( ) Dr. Hazim Dwairi 1

Similar documents
Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

Horizontal Distribution of Forces to Individual Shear Walls

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method

The degree of slenderness in a column is expressed in terms of "slenderness ratio," defined below:

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method

Software Verification

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

Shear in Beams 2. Reinforced Concrete Design. Shear Design Summary. Shear design summary More detail shear design. Shear span Deep beam WSD SDM

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS COMPRESSION MEMBERS TUTORIAL 2 INTERMEDIATE AND SHORT COMPRESSION MEMBERS

The Simple Solutions of Four Actual Problems. of General Theory of Relativity.

Software Verification

The Design of Special Truss Moment Frames Against Progressive Collapse

thirteen wood construction: column design ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture

EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL STUDY OF DEBONDING IN COMPOSITE ADHESIVE JOINTS

08.06 Shooting Method for Ordinary Differential Equations

Where and are the factored end moments of the column and >.

SEISMIC EVALUATION AND ITS VERIFICATION OF STREET BUILDINGS IN TAIWAN

twenty steel construction: columns & tension members ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2018 lecture

Formal Methods for Deriving Element Equations

BEHAVIOR OF SQUARE CONCRETE-FILLED TUBULAR COLUMNS UNDER ECCENTRIC COMPRESSION WITH DOUBLE CURVATURE DEFLECTION

Lecture Notes: Finite Element Analysis, J.E. Akin, Rice University

Reinforced Concrete Design

Two-Way Flat Slab (Concrete Floor with Drop Panels) System Analysis and Design

Wood Design. = theoretical allowed buckling stress

Improved Characterization Model for Granular Bases

FEA Solution Procedure

Reinforced Concrete Design

State variable feedback

WRAP-AROUND GUSSET PLATES

1. Solve Problem 1.3-3(c) 2. Solve Problem 2.2-2(b)

More on Security Constrained Optimal Power Flow

Sway Column Example. PCA Notes on ACI 318

Calculation of slab-column middle connection under combined shear and unbalanced moment

Reinforced Concrete Design

Ultimate Strength Evaluation for Wide-Type Box Girders in Cable-Supported Bridges

fib Model Code 2020 Shear and punching provisions, needs for improvements with respect to new and existing structures

NOVEL FLOWCHART TO COMPUTE MOMENT MAGNIFICATION FOR LONG R/C COLUMNS

Turbulence Deposition

PROBLEMS

Design resistance of steel expansion anchors under shear loading derived using methods of design assisted by testing

4.3 Moment Magnification

Design of AAC floor slabs according to EN 12602

Copyright Canadian Institute of Steel Construction

The Open Civil Engineering Journal

Ch. 10 Design of Short Columns Subject to Axial Load and Bending

Masonry Beams. Ultimate Limit States: Flexure and Shear

Prandl established a universal velocity profile for flow parallel to the bed given by

FEA Solution Procedure

Shooting Method for Ordinary Differential Equations Autar Kaw

Two-Way Concrete Floor Slab with Beams Design and Detailing (CSA A )

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A )

Chapter 1: Differential Form of Basic Equations

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

Probabilistic Models for Seismic Design and Assessment of RC Structural Walls

Reinforced Concrete Design

FEA Solution Procedure

OUTLINE. CHAPTER 7: Flexural Members. Types of beams. Types of loads. Concentrated load Distributed load. Moment

Beams on Elastic Foundation

CLEARINGHOUSE FOR FEDERAL SCIgCTIFIJ AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION, CFSTI DOCUMENT KANAGEWEirr BRANCH UO.ll LIMITATIONS IN REPRODUCTION QUALITY

RC DEEP BEAMS ANALYSIS CONSIDERING LOCALIZATION IN COMPRESSION

Lecture 26. Blackbody Radiation (Ch. 7)

Compression Members Local Buckling and Section Classification

SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL, AEROSPACE AND CIVIL ENGINEERING HYDRAULICS 2 LABORATORY EXERCISE. Forces on Two-Dimensional Bodies in a Wind Tunnel

IMPROVED ANALYSIS OF BOLTED SHEAR CONNECTION UNDER ECCENTRIC LOADS

Bertrand s Theorem. October 8, µr 2 + V (r) 0 = dv eff dr. 3 + dv. f (r 0 )

Assignment 1 - actions

STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR OF R/C DEEP BEAM WITH HEADED LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENTS

Modelling by Differential Equations from Properties of Phenomenon to its Investigation

Addition of velocities. Taking differentials of the Lorentz transformation, relative velocities may be calculated:

Bending resistance of high performance concrete elements

UNCERTAINTY FOCUSED STRENGTH ANALYSIS MODEL

A NORMALIZED EQUATION OF AXIALLY LOADED PILES IN ELASTO-PLASTIC SOIL

A Time-Dependent Model For Predicting The Response Of A Horizontally Loaded Pile Embedded In A Layered Transversely Isotropic Saturated Soil

FORCE DISTRIBUTION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COUPLING BEAMS WITH DIAGONAL REINFORCEMENT

Module 3. Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures by the Displacement Method

Simplified Identification Scheme for Structures on a Flexible Base

Evaluate Inverse Trigonometric Functions. 5p, }} 13p, }}

A.1. Member capacities A.2. Limit analysis A.2.1. Tributary weight.. 7. A.2.2. Calculations. 7. A.3. Direct design 13

Chem 4501 Introduction to Thermodynamics, 3 Credits Kinetics, and Statistical Mechanics. Fall Semester Homework Problem Set Number 10 Solutions

Part G-4: Sample Exams

Lecture Note 6. Moment-Curvature (M-φ) Relation - I

Data Extrapolation Method for The Dynamic Increasing Energy Test: SEM-CASE

CHAPTER 5 INTRODUCTION TO OCEANIC TURBIDITY CURRENTS 5.1 INTRODUCTION

EXPT. 5 DETERMINATION OF pk a OF AN INDICATOR USING SPECTROPHOTOMETRY

Advanced topics in Finite Element Method 3D truss structures. Jerzy Podgórski

Lateral Load Capacity of Piles

sin u 5 opp } cos u 5 adj } hyp opposite csc u 5 hyp } sec u 5 hyp } opp Using Inverse Trigonometric Functions

Simplified Buckling Analysis of Skeletal Structures

Department of Industrial Engineering Statistical Quality Control presented by Dr. Eng. Abed Schokry

Details of Check for Boundary Element Requirements

Classify by number of ports and examine the possible structures that result. Using only one-port elements, no more than two elements can be assembled.


The physics of the longitudinal light clock

Sources of Non Stationarity in the Semivariogram

Virtual Work for Frames. Virtual Work for Frames. Virtual Work for Frames. Virtual Work for Frames. Virtual Work for Frames. Virtual Work for Frames

5. The Bernoulli Equation

DEVELOPMENT OF COMPONENT EXPLOSIVE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT WORKBOOK (CEDAW)

FRTN10 Exercise 12. Synthesis by Convex Optimization

A Single Species in One Spatial Dimension

Transcription:

Department of Civil Engineering Letre 8 Slender Colmns Definition of Slender Colmn When the eentri loads P are applied, the olmn deflets laterally by amont δ,, however the internal moment at midheight: M ( ) P e + δ The defletion δ inreases the moments for whih the olmn mst be designed. 1

Definition of Slender Colmn Failre ors when the load- moment rve O-B for the point of maximm moment intersets the interation diagram of the ross setion. Definition of Slender Colmn A slender olmn is defined as the olmn that has a signifiant redtion in its axial load apaity de to moments reslting from lateral defletions of the olmn. In the derivation of the ACI ode. a signifiant redtion was arbitrarily taken anything greater than 5%. Less than 10 % of olmns in braed or non- sway frames and less than half of olmns in nbraed or sway frames wold be lassified as slender following ACI Code Proedre.

Bkling The differential eqation for olmn in state of netral eqilibrim is: Leonhard Eler soltion: n: nmber of half-sine waves in length of olmn " EIy Py P n π EI l Bkling The lowest vale for P will or with n 1.0 This gives the Eler Bkling Load: Effetive length onept P π EI 1 ( l) n π EI ( kl) Effetive Length Fator k P π EI l P π EI l 3

Effetive Length Fator Effetive Length Fator 4

Effetive Length Fator Effetive Length Fator 5

Effetive Length Fator ψ EI EI / l b / l of olmns of beams Ψ A and Ψ B are top and bottom fators of olmns. For a hinged end Ψ is infinite or 10 and for a fixed end Ψ is zero or 1. Assmptions for nomographs: E 4700 f 1. Symmetrial retanglar frames. Eqal load applied at top of olmns 3. Unloaded beams. 4. All olmns bkle at the same moment I I b 0.35I 0.70I g g ' Nomographs for k 6

Nomographs for k As a reslt of these very idealized assmptions, nomographs tend to nderestimate the vales of the effetive length fator k for elasti frames of pratial dimensions p to 15%. This leads to an nderestimate of the magnified moment, M. The lowest pratial vales for k in a sway frame is abot 1. de to frition in the hinges. When smaller vales obtained from nomographs, it is good pratie to se k 1.. 7

Slenderness Effet For olmns in nonsway frames, ACI Se. 1.1. allows the slenderness effets to be negleted if: k : effetive length fator l : olmn nspported length r : radis of gyration r 0.3h (Retanglar) r 0.5D kl r (Cirlar) M < 34 1 M 1 Slenderness Effet For olmns in nbraed frames, ACI Se. 1.1. allows the slenderness effets to be negleted if: If kl r >100 kl r < seond-order order analysis. design shall be based on a 8

Moment Magnifier Design Proedre 1) Length of Colmns.. The nspported length l is the lear height between slabs or beams apable of giving lateral spport to the olmn. ) Effetive Length Fator.. an be estimated from the nomographs. 3) Braed or Unbraed Frames.. Inspet braing elements, sh as walls, whether stiffer than olmns (braed) or not (nbraed). 4) Consideration of Slenderness Effets.. Chek slenderness ratio: kl? r Moment Magnifier Design Proedre 5) Minimm Moment. ACI Eqn. (10-14) 14) states that for olmns in braed frames, minimm moment M : M P (15 + 0.03 ),min h 6) Moment Magnifier. ACI Se. 10.1.3 states that olmns on nonsway frames shall be designed for P and M : M C m δ M ns M 0.6 + 0.4 M ; δ 1 ns Cm P 1 0.75P 0.4 1.0 9

Moment Magnifier Design Proedre Where M is the larger end moment M 1 /M is positive for single rvatre and negative for doble rvatre. Bkling load, P is: and: EI 0.EI g + EsI se 0.40EI EI 1+ β 1+ β d d g β d max. fatored axial dead load in the olmn total fatored axial load in the olmn The figre shows a typial frame in an indstrial bilding. The frames are spaed 6.0 m apart. The olmns rest on a 1. m-sqare footings. The soil bearing apaity is 190 kn/m. Design olmns C- D and D-E.. Use f 0 MPa and f y 40 MPa for beams and olmns. Use lower ombination and strength-redtion redtion fators from ACI 318-05 setions 9. and 9.3 (Example 1- : Magregor and Wight 4 th edition in SI nits) 10

5mm 93.0 385mm 400mm 7300mm 16.4 69. 6000mm 51. 9100mm 100mm 7600mm (kn.m) 1) Callate the olmn loads from frame analysis a first-order-elasti elasti analysis of the frame gave the following fores and moments Colmn CD Colmn DE Servie load, P Servie moment at top of olmns Servie moments at bottom of olmns Dead 350 kn Live 105 kn Dead -80 kn.m Live -19 kn.m Dead -8 kn.m Live -11 kn.m Dead 0 kn Live 60 kn Dead 57.5 kn.m Live 15.0 kn.m Dead -43 kn.m Live -11 kn.m 11

) Determine the fatored loads a) Colmn CD P 1. x 350 + 1.6 x 105 588 kn Moment at top 1. x -80 +1.6 x -19-16.4 kn.m Moment at bottom 1. x -8 + 1.6 x 11-51. kn.m ACI se. 10.0, M is always +ve, and M 1 is +ve if the olmn bent in single rvatre. Sine CD is bent in doble rvatre, M +16.4kN.m and M 1-51. kn.m b) Colmn DE P 360 kn, M +93 kn.m, M 1 +69. kn.m 3) Make a preliminary seletion of the olmn size (assme ρ t 0.015) P Ag ( trial ) ' 0.40 f + f ρ Bease of slenderness and large moments se 350mm x 350mm olmns throghot 0.40 ( ) 588 10 55,894mm ( 0 + 0.015 40) y t 3 1

4) Are the olmns slender? l a) Colmn CD: 6000 610 5390mm From Table1 -, k r 0.3 350 105mm kl r 0.77 5390 39.5 105 M 34 1 M 0. 77 51. 34 1 16.4 1 (ACI10.11.3.1) (ACI10.11.) 39.5>38.9 Colmn CD jst slender 38.9 4) Are the olmns slender? l b) Colmn DE: 7300 610 5390mm From Table1 -, k r 0.3 350 105mm kl r 0.86 6690 54.8 105 M 34 1 M 0. 86 69. 34 1 93 1 (ACI10.11.3.1) (ACI10.11.) 54.8 > 5.1 Colmn CD is slender 5.1 13

5) Chek whether the moments are less than the minimm ACI Se. 10.1.3. reqires that braed slender olmns be designed for minimm eentriity of (15 + 0.03h).. For 350-mm olmn, this is 5.5 mm. Colmn CD : P e Colmn DE : P e min min 588 5.5 10 360 5.5 10 3 15kN. m 9.kN. m Sine atal moments exeed these vales, the olmns shall be designed for atal moments 3 6) Compte EI Use a onservative estimate by 0.40EI EI 1+ β E 4700 0 1,019 MPa 3 350 350 6 I g 150.5 10 mm 1 9 0.40E I 10,513.87 10 N. mm g d g 4 14

6) Compte EI a) Colmn CD 1. 350 βd 0.714 588 9 10,513.87 10 EI 1+ 0.714 b) Colmn DE 1. 0 βd 0.733 360 9 10,513.87 10 EI 1+ 0.733 9 6134.11 10 N. mm 9 6066.86 10 N. mm ψ 7) Compte the effetive-length fators We will se the nomograph this time jst for demonstration, one shold se the same method throghot all allations. 75 mm E I b E I b b 0.47 / l / l 6 E 875.36 10 ψ E 9 E 5.7 10 b b / 7300 / 7600 0.173 6 6 E (875.36 10 / 5695+ 875.36 10 ψ D 9 E 5.7 10 / 9100 / 7300) 400mm 5mm 385mm I g 15.07 x 10 9 mm 4 I b 0.35 x Ig 5.7 x 10 9 mm 4 I 0.70 x 350 4 /1 875.36 x 10 6 mm 4 15

Colmn CD is restrained at C by the rotational resistane of the soil nder the footing, ths: 4E I / l ψ I f ks Where I f is the moment of inertia of the ontat area between the footing and the soil and k s is the sbgrade reation. 4 100 9 I f 17.8 10 mm 1 6 4 1,019 875.36 10 / 7300 ψ C 1.4 9 17.8 10 0.047 Ψ D Ψ C Ψ D kde 0.65< 0.86 USE 0.86 k 0.710< 0.77 CD USE 0.77 Ψ E 16

Sbgrade Modls Allowable bearing apaity (kn/m ) 39.4 478.8 718. 957.6 6.8 47.1 31.4 K s (kn/m 3 ) 15.7 8) Compte magnified moments a) Colmn CD C m 0.6 + 0.4 0.438 π EI P δ ns USE 51. 0.40 16.4 π 6134.11 10 ( kl ) ( 0.77 5390) 0.438 0.564 < 1.0 1 588 /(0.75 3514.7) δ ns 1.0 (i.e.setion of maximm moment remains at the end of the olmn) 9 M 1.0 x 16.4 16.4 kn.m 3514.7kN 17

8) Compte magnified moments a) Colmn DE C m ns 69. 0.6 + 0.4 0.40 93 0.900 π EI P δ π 6066.86 10 ( kl ) ( 0.86 6690) 0.900 1.5 1 360 /(0.75 1809) This olmn is affeted by slenderness 9 M 1.5 x 93 113.9 kn.m 1809kN 9) Selet the reinforement a) Design olmn CD for P 588 kn and M 16.4 kn.m USE 350mm x 350mm with 4φ5 b) Design olmn DE for P 360 kn and M 113.9 kn.m USE 350mm x 350mm with 4φ5 18