ECE6604 PERSONAL & MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS. Week 3. Flat Fading Channels Envelope Distribution Autocorrelation of a Random Process

Similar documents
ECE6604 PERSONAL & MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS. Week 4. Envelope Correlation Space-time Correlation

EE6604 Personal & Mobile Communications. Week 5. Level Crossing Rate and Average Fade Duration. Statistical Channel Modeling.

Lecture 2. Fading Channel

Chapter 2 Propagation Modeling

Digital Band-pass Modulation PROF. MICHAEL TSAI 2011/11/10

Lecture 7: Wireless Channels and Diversity Advanced Digital Communications (EQ2410) 1

Mobile Radio Communications

Point-to-Point versus Mobile Wireless Communication Channels

Communication Systems Lecture 21, 22. Dong In Kim School of Information & Comm. Eng. Sungkyunkwan University

EAS 305 Random Processes Viewgraph 1 of 10. Random Processes

EE4601 Communication Systems

EE303: Communication Systems

EE401: Advanced Communication Theory

UCSD ECE153 Handout #40 Prof. Young-Han Kim Thursday, May 29, Homework Set #8 Due: Thursday, June 5, 2011

SRI VIDYA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY UNIT 3 RANDOM PROCESS TWO MARK QUESTIONS

ENSC327 Communications Systems 2: Fourier Representations. Jie Liang School of Engineering Science Simon Fraser University

UCSD ECE 153 Handout #46 Prof. Young-Han Kim Thursday, June 5, Solutions to Homework Set #8 (Prepared by TA Fatemeh Arbabjolfaei)

2016 Spring: The Final Exam of Digital Communications

2A1H Time-Frequency Analysis II

s o (t) = S(f)H(f; t)e j2πft df,

ELEG 3143 Probability & Stochastic Process Ch. 6 Stochastic Process

CS6956: Wireless and Mobile Networks Lecture Notes: 2/4/2015

Signals and Systems: Part 2

Chapter 5 Random Variables and Processes

Fading Statistical description of the wireless channel

Introduction to Probability and Stochastic Processes I

Direct-Sequence Spread-Spectrum

CHAPTER 14. Based on the info about the scattering function we know that the multipath spread is T m =1ms, and the Doppler spread is B d =0.2 Hz.

EEM 409. Random Signals. Problem Set-2: (Power Spectral Density, LTI Systems with Random Inputs) Problem 1: Problem 2:

This examination consists of 10 pages. Please check that you have a complete copy. Time: 2.5 hrs INSTRUCTIONS

UCSD ECE250 Handout #27 Prof. Young-Han Kim Friday, June 8, Practice Final Examination (Winter 2017)

3F1 Random Processes Examples Paper (for all 6 lectures)

ON THE SIMULATIONS OF CORRELATED NAKAGAMI-M FADING CHANNELS USING SUM OF-SINUSOIDS METHOD

Communications and Signal Processing Spring 2017 MSE Exam

7 The Waveform Channel

EE538 Final Exam Fall :20 pm -5:20 pm PHYS 223 Dec. 17, Cover Sheet

EE6604 Personal & Mobile Communications. Week 12a. Power Spectrum of Digitally Modulated Signals

Outline. 1 Path-Loss, Large-Scale-Fading, Small-Scale Fading. 2 Simplified Models. 3 Multipath Fading Channel

Lecture Notes 7 Stationary Random Processes. Strict-Sense and Wide-Sense Stationarity. Autocorrelation Function of a Stationary Process

On Coding for Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Systems

EE6604 Personal & Mobile Communications. Week 13. Multi-antenna Techniques

MATHEMATICAL TOOLS FOR DIGITAL TRANSMISSION ANALYSIS

16.584: Random (Stochastic) Processes

Signal Processing Signal and System Classifications. Chapter 13

LOPE3202: Communication Systems 10/18/2017 2

5 Analog carrier modulation with noise

ECE-340, Spring 2015 Review Questions

Fundamentals of Noise

Stochastic Processes

Multiple Antennas. Mats Bengtsson, Björn Ottersten. Channel characterization and modeling 1 September 8, Signal KTH Research Focus

Stochastic Processes. M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada, Reno

Lecture 6: Modeling of MIMO Channels Theoretical Foundations of Wireless Communications 1. Overview. CommTh/EES/KTH

Perfect Modeling and Simulation of Measured Spatio-Temporal Wireless Channels

Principles of Communications

ECE 650 Lecture #10 (was Part 1 & 2) D. van Alphen. D. van Alphen 1

Fundamentals of Digital Commun. Ch. 4: Random Variables and Random Processes

Module 4. Signal Representation and Baseband Processing. Version 2 ECE IIT, Kharagpur

2.1 Basic Concepts Basic operations on signals Classication of signals

Square Root Raised Cosine Filter

Analog Electronics 2 ICS905

This examination consists of 11 pages. Please check that you have a complete copy. Time: 2.5 hrs INSTRUCTIONS

2A1H Time-Frequency Analysis II Bugs/queries to HT 2011 For hints and answers visit dwm/courses/2tf

Problem Sheet 1 Examples of Random Processes

A Wideband Space-Time MIMO Channel Simulator Based on the Geometrical One-Ring Model

Lecture 6: Modeling of MIMO Channels Theoretical Foundations of Wireless Communications 1

PROBABILITY AND RANDOM PROCESSESS

Name of the Student: Problems on Discrete & Continuous R.Vs

EE6604 Personal & Mobile Communications. Week 15. OFDM on AWGN and ISI Channels

5.9 Power Spectral Density Gaussian Process 5.10 Noise 5.11 Narrowband Noise

P 1.5 X 4.5 / X 2 and (iii) The smallest value of n for

2.1 Introduction 2.22 The Fourier Transform 2.3 Properties of The Fourier Transform 2.4 The Inverse Relationship between Time and Frequency 2.

Review of Doppler Spread The response to exp[2πift] is ĥ(f, t) exp[2πift]. ĥ(f, t) = β j exp[ 2πifτ j (t)] = exp[2πid j t 2πifτ o j ]

Copyright license. Exchanging Information with the Stars. The goal. Some challenges

Estimation of the Capacity of Multipath Infrared Channels

Chapter 4: Continuous channel and its capacity

Residual carrier frequency offset and symbol timing offset in narrow-band OFDM modulation

ω 0 = 2π/T 0 is called the fundamental angular frequency and ω 2 = 2ω 0 is called the

ECE 541 Stochastic Signals and Systems Problem Set 11 Solution

SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR COMMUNICATIONS

Name of the Student: Problems on Discrete & Continuous R.Vs

Es e j4φ +4N n. 16 KE s /N 0. σ 2ˆφ4 1 γ s. p(φ e )= exp 1 ( 2πσ φ b cos N 2 φ e 0

LECTURE 16 AND 17. Digital signaling on frequency selective fading channels. Notes Prepared by: Abhishek Sood

Summary II: Modulation and Demodulation

Parameter Estimation

Digital Communications

Chapter 5 Frequency Domain Analysis of Systems

ECE353: Probability and Random Processes. Lecture 18 - Stochastic Processes

Ranging detection algorithm for indoor UWB channels

3. ESTIMATION OF SIGNALS USING A LEAST SQUARES TECHNIQUE

Signals and Spectra - Review

Signal Design for Band-Limited Channels

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Chapter 2 Random Processes

ECE 636: Systems identification

Fourier Methods in Digital Signal Processing Final Exam ME 579, Spring 2015 NAME

Kevin Buckley a i. communication. information source. modulator. encoder. channel. encoder. information. demodulator decoder. C k.

Fourier Analysis Linear transformations and lters. 3. Fourier Analysis. Alex Sheremet. April 11, 2007

A GENERALISED (M, N R ) MIMO RAYLEIGH CHANNEL MODEL FOR NON- ISOTROPIC SCATTERER DISTRIBUTIONS

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING Final Examination - Fall 2015 EE 4601: Communication Systems

Weibull-Gamma composite distribution: An alternative multipath/shadowing fading model

Transcription:

1 ECE6604 PERSONAL & MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS Week 3 Flat Fading Channels Envelope Distribution Autocorrelation of a Random Process

2 Multipath-Fading Mechanism local scatterers mobile subscriber base station A typical macrocellular mobile radio environment.

3 Multipath-Fading Mechanism local scatterers local scatterers mobile station mobile station Typical mobile-to-mobile radio propagation environment.

4 local mean Ω (db) area mean µ (db) envelope fading Path loss, shadowing, envelope fading.

5 Doppler Shift y n th incoming wave mobile station v θ n x 2-D Model of a typical wave component incident on a mobile station (MS). Assuming2-Dpropagation,theDoppler shiftisf D,n = f m cosθ n,wheref m = v/λ c (λ c is the carrier wavelength, v is the mobile station velocity).

Multipath Propagation Consider the transmission of the band-pass signal s(t) = Re { s(t)e j2πf ct } At the receiver antenna, the nth plane wave arrives at angle θ n and experiences Doppler shift f D,n = f m cosθ n and propagation delay τ n. If there are N propagation paths, the received bandpass signal is r(t) = Re N n=1 C n e jφ n j2πcτ n /λ c +j2π(f c +f D,n )t s(t τ n ), where C n, φ n, f D,n and τ n are the amplitude, phase, Doppler shift and time delay, respectively, associated with the nth propagation path, and c is the speed of light. The delay τ n = d n /c is the propagation delay associated with the nth propagation path, where d n is the length of the path. The path lengths, d n, will depend on the physical scattering geometry which we have not specified at this point. 6

7 Multipath Propagation The received bandpass signal r(t) has the form where the received complex envelope is and r(t) = Re [ r(t)e j2πf ct ] r(t) = N n=1 C n e jφ n(t) s(t τ n ) φ n (t) = φ n 2πcτ n /λ c +2πf D,n t is the time-variant phase associated with the nth propagation path. Note that the nth component varies with the Doppler frequency f D,n. The term cτ n /λ c is the propagation distance cτ n normalized by the carrier wavelength λ c. For cellular frequencies (900 MHz), λ c is on the order of a foot. The phase φ n is a random introduced by the nth scatterer and can be assumed to be uniformly distributed on [ π, π). The received phase at any time t, φ n (t) is uniformly distributed on [ π,π).

8 Flat Fading - impulse response The received waveform is given by the convolution r(t) = t 0 g(t,τ) s(t τ)dτ It follows that the channel can be modeled by a linear time-variant filter having the time-variant impulse response g(t,τ) = N n=1 C n e jφ n(t) δ(τ τ n ) If the differential path delays τ i τ j are all very small compared to the modulation symbol period, T, then the τ n can be replaced by the mean delay µ τ inside the delta function. Note that this approximation is not applied to the channel phases φ n (t), since small changes in τ n result in large changes in φ n (t). The channel impulse response has the approximate form g(t,τ) = g(t)δ(τ µ τ ), The received complex envelope is g(t) = N n=1 C n e jφ n(t). r(t) = g(t) s(t µ τ ) (1) which experiences fading due to the time-varying complex channel gain g(t).

9 Flat Fading - frequency domain By taking Fourier transforms of both sides of (1), the received complex envelope in the frequency domain is R(f) = G(f) S(f)e j2πfµ τ Since the channel component g(t) changes with time, it follows that G(f) has a finite non-zero width in the frequency domain. Due to the convolution operation, the output spectrum R(f) will be wider than the input spectrum S(f). This broadening of the transmitted signal spectrum is caused by the channel time variations and is called frequency spreading or Doppler spreading. If the maximum Doppler frequency f m is much less than the signal bandwidth W c, then the Doppler spreading will not distort S(f). Fortunately, this is often the case.

10 Channel Transfer Function - Flat Fading The time-variant channel transfer function is obtained by taking the Fourier transform of the time-variant channel impulse response g(t, τ) with respect to the delay variable τ, i.e., T(t,f) = g(t)e j2πfµ τ. Since the magnitude response is T(t,f) = g(t), all frequency components in the received signal are subject to the same time-variant amplitude gain g(t) and phase response g(t) = 2πfµ τ. The received signal is said to exhibit flat fading, because the magnitude of the time-variant channel transfer function T(t, f) is constant (or flat) with respect to frequency variable f. The phase response g(t) = 2πfµ τ is linear in f meaning that the channel simply delays the input signal and attenuates it.

11 Invoking the Central Limit Theorem Consider the transmission of an unmodulated carrier, s(t) = 1. For flat fading channels, the received band-pass signal has the quadrature representation r(t) = g I (t)cos2πf c t g Q (t)sin2πf c t where g I (t) = N n=1 g Q (t) = N n=1 and where φ n (t) = φ n 2πcτ n /λ c +2πf D,n t. C n cosφ n (t) C n sinφ n (t) The phases φ n are independent and uniform on the interval [ π,π), and the path delays τ n are all independent with f c τ n 1. Therefore, the phases φ n (t) at any time t can be treated as being independent and uniformly distributed on the interval [ π,π). In the limit N, the central limit theorem can be invoked and g I (t) and g Q (t) can be treated as Gaussian random processes, i.e., at any time t, g I (t) and g Q (t) are Gaussian random variables. The complex faded envelope is g(t) = g I (t)+jg Q (t)

12 Rayleigh Fading Forsometypesofscatteringenvironments,g I (t)andg Q (t)atanytimet 1 areindependent identically distributed Gaussian random variables with zero mean and identical variance b 0 = E[g 2 I (t 1)] = E[g 2 Q (t 1)]. This typically occurs in a rich scattering environment where there is no line-of-sight or strong specular component in the received signal (i.e., there is no dominant C n ) and isotropic antennas are used. Under such conditions, the channel exhibits Rayleigh fading. The probability density function the envelope α = g(t 1 ) = g 2 I(t 1 )+g 2 Q(t 1 ) can be obtained by using a bi-variate transformation of random variables (see Appendix in textbook). The envelope α = g(t 1 ) = gi(t 2 1 )+gq(t 2 1 ) is Rayleigh distributed at any time t 1, i.e., p α (x) = x exp b x2 0 2b = 2x exp 0 Ω x2 p Ω, x 0, p where Ω p = E[α 2 ] = E[gI 2(t 1)]+E[gQ 2(t 1)] = 2b 0 is the average envelope power. The squared-envelope α 2 at any time t 1 has the exponential distribution p α 2(x) = 1 exp Ω x p Ω, x 0. p

13 Ricean Fading θ 0 mobile direction of motion A line-of-sight (LoS) or specular (strong reflected) component arrives at angle θ 0.

14 For scattering environments that have a specular or LoS component, g I (t) and g Q (t) are Gaussian random processes with non-zero means m I (t) and m Q (t), respectively. If we again assume that g I (t 1 ) and g Q (t 1 ) at any time t 1 are independent random variables with variance b 0 = E[(g I (t 1 ) m I (t 1 )) 2 ] = E[(g Q (t 1 ) m Q (t 1 )) 2 ], then the magnitude of the envelope α = g(t 1 ) at any time t 1 has a Rice distribution. With Aulin s Ricean fading model m I (t) = E[g I (t)] = s cos(2πf m cos(θ 0 )t+φ 0 ) m Q (t) = E[g Q (t)] = s sin(2πf m cos(θ 0 )t+φ 0 ) where f m cos(θ 0 ) and φ 0 are the Doppler shift and random phase offset associated with the LoS or specular component, respectively. The envelope α(t) = g(t) = g 2 I(t)+g 2 Q(t) has the Rice distribution p α (x) = x exp { x2 +s 2 } xs b 2b Io 0, x 0 0 b 0 s 2 = m I (t) 2 +m 2 Q (t) is the specular power. 2b 0 is the scatter power. The Rice factor, K = s 2 /2b 0, is the ratio of the power in the specular and scatter components.

15 The average envelope power is E[α 2 ] = Ω p = s 2 +2b 0 and Hence, p α (x) = 2x(K +1) Ω p exp s 2 = KΩ p K +1, K (K +1)x2 Ω p 2b 0 = Ω p K +1 I o 2x K(K +1) Ω p, x 0 The squared-envelope α 2 (t) has non-central chi-square distribution with two degrees of freedom p α 2(x) = (K +1) Ω p exp K (K +1)x Ω p I o 2 K(K +1)x Ω p, x 0 The squared-envelope is important for the performance analysis of digital communication systems because it is proportional to the received signal power and, hence, the received signal-to-noise ratio.

16 3.0 2.5 2.0 K = 0 K = 3 K = 7 K = 15 p α (x) 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 x The Rice distribution for several values of K with Ω p = 1.

17 Nakagami Fading Nakagami fading describes the magnitude of the received complex envelope by the distribution p α (x) = 2mm x 2m 1 exp Γ(m)Ω m mx2 p Ω m 1 p 2 When m = 1, the Nakagami distribution becomes the Rayleigh distribution, when m = 1/2 it becomes a one-sided Gaussian distribution, and when m the distribution approaches an impulse (no fading). The Rice distribution can be closely approximated with a Nakagami distribution by using the following relation between the Rice factor K and the Nakagami shape factor m K m 2 m+m 1 (K +1)2 m (2K +1). The squared-envelope has the Gamma distribution p α 2(x) = m 2Ω p m x m 1 Γ(m) exp mx 2Ω p.

18 3.0 m = 1 m = 2 m = 4 m = 8 m = 16 2.0 p α (x) 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 x The Nakagami pdf for several values of m with Ω p = 1.

19 1.0 0.8 0.6 F α 2 (x) 0.4 0.2 m=2 ~ (K=3.8 db) m=4 ~ (K=8.1 db) m=8 ~ (K=11.6 db) m=16 ~ (k=14.8 db) 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.9 x Comparison of the cdf of the squared-envelope with Ricean and Nakagami fading.

20 X 1 ( t) sample space S s s 1 2 s ξ X ( t ) 2 t t X ( ) ξ t t Ensemble of Sample Functions for a Random Process.

21 Autocorrelation Functions Let X(t) denote a random process. At any time t, X(t) is a random variable with probability density function f X(t) (x). The ensemble mean of X(t) is µ X (t) = E[X(t)] = xf X(t) (x)dx The autocorrelation of X(t) is obtained from the random variables X(t 1 ) and X(t 2 ) as φ XX (t 1,t 2 ) = E[X(t 1 )X(t 2 )] = x 1 x 2 f X(t1 ),X(t 2 )(x 1,x 2 )dx 1 dx 2 Often the same random variable will appear in both X(t 1 ) and X(t 2 ), meaning that X(t 1 ) and X(t 2 ) are correlated. For a wide sense stationary random process where τ = t 2 t 1. µ X (t) µ X φ XX (t 1,t 2 ) = φ XX (t 2 t 1 ) φ XX (τ)

22 Properties of φ XX (τ) The autocorrelation function, φ XX (τ), of a stationary random process satisfies the following properties. φ XX (0) = E[X 2 (t)]. This is the total power in the random process. φ XX (τ) = φ XX ( τ). The autocorrelation function must be an even function. φ XX (τ) φ XX (0). This is a variant of the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality. φ XX ( ) = E 2 [X(t)] = µ 2 X. This holds if X(t) contains no periodic components and is equal to the d.c. power.

Complex-valued Random Process A complex-valued random process is given by Z(t) = X(t) + jy(t) where X(t) and Y(t) are real-valued random processes. The autocorrelation function of a wide sense stationary complexvalued random process is φ ZZ (τ) = 1 2 E[Z(t 1)Z (t 2 )] = 1 2 (φ XX(τ)+φ YY (τ)+j(φ YX (τ) φ XY (τ))). The factor of 1/2 in included for convenience, when Z(t) is a complexvalued Gaussian random process. The crosscorrelation function between two complex-valued wide sense stationary random process satisfies the following properties φ ZW(τ) = φ WZ ( τ) φ ZZ (τ) = φ ZZ( τ) 23

24 Power Spectral Density The power spectral density (psd) of a wide-sense stationary random process X(t) is the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function, i.e., S XX (f) = = φ XX(τ)e j2πfτ dτ φ XX (τ) = S XX(f)e j2πfτ df. In our case, we are interested in the bandpass process where r(t) = g I (t)cos2πf c t g Q (t)sin2πf c t g(t) = g Q (t)+jg Q (t) is the complex fading envelope of the channel. For g(t), we are interested in its autocorrelation function and Doppler or power spectrum φ gg (τ) = φ gi g I (τ)+jφ gi g Q (τ) S gg (f) = S gi g I (f)+js gi g Q (f)