Subdiffusion in a nonconvex polygon

Similar documents
Discontinuous Galerkin methods for fractional diffusion problems

Iterative methods for positive definite linear systems with a complex shift

Maximum norm estimates for energy-corrected finite element method

Convergence analysis of a discontinuous Galerkin method for a sub-diffusion equation

Numerical Solutions to Partial Differential Equations

1 Discretizing BVP with Finite Element Methods.

Scientific Computing WS 2017/2018. Lecture 18. Jürgen Fuhrmann Lecture 18 Slide 1

INTRODUCTION TO FINITE ELEMENT METHODS

A posteriori error estimation for elliptic problems

Error estimates for a finite volume element method for parabolic equations in convex polygonal domains

Scientific Computing WS 2018/2019. Lecture 15. Jürgen Fuhrmann Lecture 15 Slide 1

10 The Finite Element Method for a Parabolic Problem

An Operator Theoretical Approach to Nonlocal Differential Equations

Multigrid Methods for Maxwell s Equations

1. Introduction. We consider the model initial boundary value problem for the fractional order parabolic differential equation (FPDE) for u(x, t):

A very short introduction to the Finite Element Method

Finite Elements. Colin Cotter. February 22, Colin Cotter FEM

A Finite Element Method Using Singular Functions for Poisson Equations: Mixed Boundary Conditions

Finite Elements. Colin Cotter. January 15, Colin Cotter FEM

Geometric Multigrid Methods

Simple Examples on Rectangular Domains

Preparation for the Final

Numerical Solutions to Partial Differential Equations

Convergence and optimality of an adaptive FEM for controlling L 2 errors

Preconditioned space-time boundary element methods for the heat equation

Applied/Numerical Analysis Qualifying Exam

Lecture 9 Approximations of Laplace s Equation, Finite Element Method. Mathématiques appliquées (MATH0504-1) B. Dewals, C.

ANALYSIS OF THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR TRANSMISSION/MIXED BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS ON GENERAL POLYGONAL DOMAINS

1. The COMPLEX PLANE AND ELEMENTARY FUNCTIONS: Complex numbers; stereographic projection; simple and multiple connectivity, elementary functions.

A Multigrid Method for Two Dimensional Maxwell Interface Problems

A gradient recovery method based on an oblique projection and boundary modification

Numerical Solution I

We denote the space of distributions on Ω by D ( Ω) 2.

Numerical Solutions to Partial Differential Equations

A POSTERIORI ERROR ESTIMATES BY RECOVERED GRADIENTS IN PARABOLIC FINITE ELEMENT EQUATIONS

Finite Element Error Estimates in Non-Energy Norms for the Two-Dimensional Scalar Signorini Problem

Projected Surface Finite Elements for Elliptic Equations

Ordinary Differential Equations II

Jim Lambers ENERGY 281 Spring Quarter Lecture 5 Notes

BEST APPROXIMATION PROPERTY IN THE W FINITE ELEMENT METHODS ON GRADED MESHES.

c 2005 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

Lecture Notes: African Institute of Mathematics Senegal, January Topic Title: A short introduction to numerical methods for elliptic PDEs

Basic Concepts of Adaptive Finite Element Methods for Elliptic Boundary Value Problems

On Pressure Stabilization Method and Projection Method for Unsteady Navier-Stokes Equations 1

MATH COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # Introduction to PDEs, Fall 2011 Professor: Jared Speck

MATH COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # Introduction to PDEs, Spring 2018 Professor: Jared Speck

Solutions of Selected Problems

Thomas Apel 1, Ariel L. Lombardi 2 and Max Winkler 1

ETNA Kent State University

Maximum-norm stability of the finite element Ritz projection with mixed boundary conditions

PREPRINT 2009:16. Existence and Uniqueness of the Solution of an Integro-Differential Equation with Weakly Singular Kernel FARDIN SAEDPANAH

A Finite Element Method Using Singular Functions: Interface Problems

MULTIGRID METHODS FOR MAXWELL S EQUATIONS

Scientific Computing I

MULTIGRID PRECONDITIONING IN H(div) ON NON-CONVEX POLYGONS* Dedicated to Professor Jim Douglas, Jr. on the occasion of his seventieth birthday.

Higher-Order Compact Finite Element Method

Numerical methods for PDEs FEM convergence, error estimates, piecewise polynomials

Springer Series in Computational Mathematics

Multigrid Methods for Saddle Point Problems

Convergence Order Studies for Elliptic Test Problems with COMSOL Multiphysics

Finite Element Method for Ordinary Differential Equations

An Analysis of the L1 Scheme for the Subdiffusion Equation with Nonsmooth Data

Error estimates for Dirichlet control problems in polygonal domains

Maximum principle for the fractional diusion equations and its applications

Chapter Two: Numerical Methods for Elliptic PDEs. 1 Finite Difference Methods for Elliptic PDEs

CONVERGENCE OF A MULTISCALE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS WITH RAPIDLY OSCILLATING COEFFICIENTS

MATH 425, FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS

Anisotropic mesh refinement in polyhedral domains: error estimates with data in L 2 (Ω)

Supraconvergence of a Non-Uniform Discretisation for an Elliptic Third-Kind Boundary-Value Problem with Mixed Derivatives

Finite Element Spectral Approximation with Numerical Integration for the Biharmonic Eigenvalue Problem

arxiv: v1 [math.na] 29 Feb 2016

Adaptive Finite Element Methods Lecture Notes Winter Term 2017/18. R. Verfürth. Fakultät für Mathematik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum

FEM Convergence for PDEs with Point Sources in 2-D and 3-D

Lehrstuhl Informatik V. Lehrstuhl Informatik V. 1. solve weak form of PDE to reduce regularity properties. Lehrstuhl Informatik V

Lucio Demeio Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale e delle Scienze Matematiche

VARIATIONAL FORMULATION OF PROBLEMS INVOLVING FRACTIONAL ORDER DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS

PIECEWISE LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT METHODS ARE NOT LOCALIZED

COMBINING MAXIMAL REGULARITY AND ENERGY ESTIMATES FOR TIME DISCRETIZATIONS OF QUASILINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS

A Framework for Analyzing and Constructing Hierarchical-Type A Posteriori Error Estimators

On Multigrid for Phase Field

Local Mesh Refinement with the PCD Method

Nodal O(h 4 )-superconvergence of piecewise trilinear FE approximations

arxiv: v5 [math.na] 1 Sep 2018

Math 4263 Homework Set 1

Isogeometric Analysis for the Fractional Laplacian

ELLIPTIC RECONSTRUCTION AND A POSTERIORI ERROR ESTIMATES FOR PARABOLIC PROBLEMS

ASYMPTOTICALLY EXACT A POSTERIORI ESTIMATORS FOR THE POINTWISE GRADIENT ERROR ON EACH ELEMENT IN IRREGULAR MESHES. PART II: THE PIECEWISE LINEAR CASE

Analysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version

Error analysis of a space-time finite element method for solving PDEs on evolving surfaces

A DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN METHOD FOR ELLIPTIC INTERFACE PROBLEMS WITH APPLICATION TO ELECTROPORATION

arxiv: v2 [math.na] 11 Jun 2018

High order, finite volume method, flux conservation, finite element method

On the approximation of the principal eigenvalue for a class of nonlinear elliptic operators

Partial Differential Equations

Ultraconvergence of ZZ Patch Recovery at Mesh Symmetry Points

A Posteriori Error Estimation Techniques for Finite Element Methods. Zhiqiang Cai Purdue University

Laplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF FRACTIONAL-ORDER DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH NONSMOOTH DATA. A Dissertation ZHI ZHOU

VARIATIONAL AND NON-VARIATIONAL MULTIGRID ALGORITHMS FOR THE LAPLACE-BELTRAMI OPERATOR.

Spline Element Method for Partial Differential Equations

Transcription:

Subdiffusion in a nonconvex polygon Kim Ngan Le and William McLean The University of New South Wales Bishnu Lamichhane University of Newcastle Monash Workshop on Numerical PDEs, February 2016

Outline Time-fractional diffusion Poisson equation on a nonconvex polygon Error bounds for fractional diffusion Numerical examples Smoothing property of diffusion equations

Time-fractional diffusion Let 0 < α < 1 and seek u = u(x, t) satisfying t u 1 α t K 2 u = 0 for x Ω and t > 0, together with the initial condition u(x, 0) = u 0 (x) and homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions, u(x, t) = 0 for x Ω and t > 0. Riemann Liouville fractional derivative in time, t 1 α v(x, t) = t t 0 (t s) α 1 v(x, s) ds. Γ(α) Recover classical (Brownian) diffusion in limit α 1.

Spatial discretisation by finite elements Assume that Ω is a 2D polygon. Triangulate Ω and let V h H0 1 (Ω) denote the corresponding space of continuous, piecewise-linear finite element functions that vanish on Ω. Variational solution u : [0, ) H0 1 (Ω) satisfies t u, v + a( 1 α t u, v) = 0 for all v H 1 0 (Ω), with u(0) = u 0, where a(u, v) = K Ω u v dx. Finite element solution u h : [0, ) V h satisfies t u h, χ + a( 1 α t u h, χ) = 0 for all χ V h, with u h (0) = u 0h u 0.

Method of lines Let N = dim V h = number of degrees of freedom, U(t) = vector of nodal values of u h (t), M = mass matrix, S = stiffness matrix. Obtain a system of integrodifferential equations in R N : M t U + S 1 α t U = 0. Reduces to usual method of lines for the heat equation in the limiting case when α 1.

Convex case Notation: Av = K 2 v : H 1 0 (Ω) H 1 (Ω), and P h : L 2 (Ω) V h denotes the orthoprojector. Theorem (McLean & Thomée, 2010) Let u 0h = P h u 0. If u 0 L 2 (Ω), then u h (t) u(t) Ct α h 2 u 0, for t > 0. If u 0 D(A) = H 2 (Ω) H0 1 (Ω), then u h (t) u(t) Ch 2 Au 0, for t 0. Classical case α = 1 proved by Bramble, Schatz, Thomée & Wahlbin (SINUM, 1977).

Error analysis relies on H 2 -regularity of the Poisson problem, K 2 u = f (x) for x Ω, with u(x) = 0 for x Ω. If Ω is convex and f L 2 (Ω), then the (variational) solution u belongs to H 2 (Ω), and u 2 C f. Here, we use the abbreviation v m = v H m (Ω). But H 2 -regularity breaks down if Ω is a polygon with a re-entrant corner.

Poisson equation on a nonconvex polygon Suppose only one re-entrant corner at the origin with angle π/β for 1/2 < β < 1. u = 0 π/β 2 u = f

Polar coordinates Separating variables, we find that the functions u n ± = r ±nβ sin(nβθ), n {1, 2, 3,...}, satisfy 2 u n ± = 0 for 0 < r < and 0 < θ < π/β, with u n ± = 0 for 0 < r < and θ = 0 or π/β. Let η = η(r) be a C cutoff function equal to 1 for small r. Then, ηu n + H0 1 (Ω) but ηun / H0 1 (Ω) for all n 1. Also, ηu n + H 2 (Ω) for all n 2 but ηu 1 + / H2 (Ω).

Singular behaviour Recall A = K 2 and put R = { Av : v H0 1 (Ω) H 2 (Ω) }, N = { v L 2 (Ω) : Av = 0 in Ω, v = 0 on Ω }. Lemma L 2 (Ω) = R N and dim N = 1. Theorem There exists q N (depending only on Ω and η) such that if f L 2 (Ω) then the variational solution u H0 1 (Ω) of the Poisson problem, K 2 u = f (x) for x Ω, with u(x) = 0 for x Ω, satisfies u q, f ηu 1 + 2 C f.

Local mesh refinement Consider a family of shape-regular triangulations T h. For each element T h, let For some γ 1, assume h = diameter of, r = distance from 0 to, h = max T h h. chr 1 1/γ h Chr 1 1/γ whenever h γ r 1, and ch γ h Ch γ whenever r < h γ. Elements increase in size from h γ near 0 to h when r c > 0.

Generalised polygon with γ = 3/2

Approximation property Given v C(Ω) let Π h v V h denote the nodal interpolant to v. Theorem If f L 2 (Ω), then the solution of the Poisson problem satisfies K 2 u = f (x) for x Ω, with u(x) = 0 for x Ω, u Π h u Chɛ(h, γ) f and u Π h u H 1 0 (Ω) Cɛ(h, γ) f, where h γβ / γ 1 β, 1 γ < 1/β, ɛ(h, γ) = h log(1 + h 1 ), γ = 1/β, h/ β γ 1, γ > 1/β.

Finite element error for the Poisson problem Corollary u h u Cɛ(h, γ) 2 f and u h u 1 Cɛ(h, γ) f. Proof. Error bound in H0 1 (Ω) follows from quasi-optimality, u h u 1 C min v V h v u 1. Error bound in L 2 (Ω) follows by usual duality argument (Nitsche trick). So for a quasi-uniform mesh (γ = 1) we have u h u Ch 2β f and u h u 1 Ch β f.

Error bounds for fractional diffusion Let P h : L 2 (Ω) V h denote the orthoprojector and R h : H 1 0 (Ω) V h the Ritz projector. Theorem For general initial data u 0 L 2 (Ω) and all t > 0, and u h (t) u(t) u 0h P h u 0 + Ct α ɛ(h, γ) 2 u 0 u h (t) u(t) 1 Ct α u 0h P h u 0 + C(t α + t 2α )ɛ(h, γ) u 0. For smoother initial data such that A 1+δ u 0 L 2 (Ω) and for 0 t T, u h (t) u(t) u h0 R h u 0 + Cδ 1 ɛ(h, γ) 2 A 1+δ u 0.

Integral representation of u(t) The proof relies on the Laplace transform, Since we have and so û(z) = 0 e zt u(t) dt. t u + 1 α t Au = 0 zû(z) u 0 + z 1 α Aû = 0 (z α I + A)û(z) = z α 1 u 0. Inversion formula: for a suitable contour Γ in the complex plane, u(t) = 1 e zt û(z) dz, t > 0. 2πi Γ

Integral representation of u h (t) Similarly, where A h : V h V h is defined by Thus, t u h + 1 α t A h u = 0 A h v, w = a(v, w) for v, w V h. (z α I + A h )û h (z) = z α 1 u 0h and u h (t) = 1 e zt û h (z) dz, t > 0, 2πi Γ leading to a representation of the error, u h (t) u(t) = 1 2πi Γ e zt z α 1[ (z α I +A h ) 1 u 0h (z α I +A) 1 u 0 ] dz.

Numerical examples We choose Ω to be the domain 0 < r < 1 and 0 < θ < π/β for β = 3/2. In the first example we solve an (inhomogeneous) fractional diffusion equation with exact solution ( t α ) u = 1 + r β (1 r) sin(βθ), Γ(α + 1) with α = 1/2. Time discretisation uses a quadrature approximation to the Laplace inversion formula.

Errors u h (t) u(t) at t = 1. 10-2 Quasiuniform (γ =1) Locally refined (γ =1/β) Error in L 2 (Ω) 10-3 10-4 10-5 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 Degrees of Freedom

In the second example we impose mixed boundary conditions and choose the initial data to be the first eigenfunction of A = K 2, u 0 = J β/2 (ωr) sin( 1 2 βθ), where ω is the smallest positive zero of J β/2. For triangulations T h with γ = 2/β = 3 we observe the following convergence rates at t = 1. α = 1/4 α = 3/4 h N error rate error rate 2 4 1957 1.465e-03 1.452e-03 2 5 7593 3.673e-04 1.996 3.640e-04 1.997 2 6 29771 9.471e-05 1.955 9.380e-05 1.956 2 7 117039 2.420e-05 1.969 2.391e-05 1.972 2 8 466089 6.059e-06 1.998 5.931e-06 2.011

Error u h (t) u(t) as a function of t, for α = 1/2 10-3 10-4 Error in L 2 (Ω) 10-5 h =2 5 h =2 6 h =2 7 10-6 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 t

Smoothing property of diffusion equations Let φ 1, φ 2, φ 3,... denote the orthonormal Let (φ n, λ n ) denote the nth eigenpair of A = K 2 in Ω: Thus, φ n H0 1 (Ω) with Aφ n = λ n φ n in Ω, with φ n = 0 on Ω. a(φ n, φ m ) = λ n δ mn and φ n, φ m = δ mn. Expand the solution of the fractional diffusion equation in a generalised Fourier series u(t) = u n (t)φ n. n=1 Modes u n (t) are damped as n, for any fixed t > 0.

Mittag Leffler function Each mode satisfies a fractional relaxation equation, Using the identity t u n + λ n 1 α t u n = 0, with u n (0) = u(0), φ n. β t t α Γ(α + 1) = we find u n (t) = u n (0)E α ( λ n t α ) where E α (z) = p=0 t α β Γ(α β + 1) z p Γ(1 + pα).

Series representation Thus, Note that u(t) = u n (0)E α ( λ n t α )φ n. n=1 E α ( λ n t α ) E 1 ( λ n t) = e λnt as α 1, giving the usual representation for the solution of the heat equation.