Experimental generalized contextuality with single-photon qubits: supplementary material

Similar documents
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Direct observation of Hardy's paradox by joint weak measurement with an entangled photon pair

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Quantum information processing using linear optics

Supplementary Figure 1: Experimental layout for the study of optical coherence via weak-field homodyne across the modes of a split single-photon

Simple scheme for efficient linear optics quantum gates

Single-Particle Interference Can Witness Bipartite Entanglement

17. Jones Matrices & Mueller Matrices

quantum error-rejection

Ph 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 20 October 2006

1 1D Schrödinger equation: Particle in an infinite box

Toward the Generation of Bell Certified Randomness Using Photons

Experimental demonstrations of teleportation of photons. Manuel Chinotti and Nikola Đorđević

Introduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann

Joint measurement of interference and path observables in optics and neutron interferometry 1

arxiv: v1 [physics.optics] 12 Feb 2013

Title Experimental long-distance quantum secure direct communication

In a D-dimensional Hilbert space, a symmetric informationally complete POVM is a

Quantum Measurements: some technical background

1 1D Schrödinger equation: Particle in an infinite box

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 20 Jan 2016

FIG. 16: A Mach Zehnder interferometer consists of two symmetric beam splitters BS1 and BS2

Contextuality and the Kochen-Specker Theorem. Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 5 Aug 2004

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Quantum state measurement

Experimental Quantum Teleportation of a Two-Qubit

Universal unitary gate for single-photon two-qubit states

PHYSICS 304 QUANTUM PHYSICS II (2005) Assignment 1 Solutions

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 25 May 2005

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations and Bell correlations in the simplest scenario

Quantum information 1/2. Konrad Banaszek, Rafa l Demkowicz-Dobrzański

High-fidelity Z-measurement error encoding of optical qubits

Quantum Teleportation with Photons. Bouwmeester, D; Pan, J-W; Mattle, K; et al. "Experimental quantum teleportation". Nature 390, 575 (1997).

The generation of terahertz frequency radiation by optical rectification

A Simple Method on Generating any Bi-Photon Superposition State with Linear Optics

Lecture 13B: Supplementary Notes on Advanced Topics. 1 Inner Products and Outer Products for Single Particle States

Quantum State Tomography of the 6 qubit photonic symmetric Dicke State. Alexander Niggebaum

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Jian-Wei Pan

Quantum mechanics and reality

Content of the lectures

Probabilistic exact cloning and probabilistic no-signalling. Abstract

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 5 Sep 2002

Remote State Preparation: Arbitrary remote control of photon polarizations for quantum communication

Single-photon quantum error rejection and correction with linear optics

Problem Set: TT Quantum Information

Experimental quantum teleportation. Dirk Bouwmeester, Jian Wei Pan, Klaus Mattle, Manfred Eibl, Harald Weinfurter & Anton Zeilinger

Linear optical implementation of a single mode quantum filter and generation of multi-photon polarization entangled state

Correlation functions in optics and quantum optics, 4

Testing The Existence of Single Photons

Quantum measurements on continuous variable systems

Lab. 1: Entanglement and Bell s Inequalities. Abstract

Testing Heisenberg s Uncertainty Principle with Polarized Single Photons

Quantum Optics and Quantum Information Laboratory

Ph 219b/CS 219b. Exercises Due: Wednesday 11 February 2009

Functional quantum nodes for entanglement distribution

Take that, Bell s Inequality!

Supplementary information for Quantum delayed-choice experiment with a beam splitter in a quantum superposition

Quantum Interference of Unpolarized Single Photons

Ph 12b. Homework Assignment No. 3 Due: 5pm, Thursday, 28 January 2010

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 4 Apr 2003

arxiv:quant-ph/ v3 18 Jan 2004

Measurement of 1- Qubit Opera4ons on Single Photons

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 5 Jun 2017

EXPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATION OF QUANTUM KEY

A Simple Model of Quantum Trajectories. Todd A. Brun University of Southern California

Quantum Dense Coding and Quantum Teleportation

Supplementary Information

All Optical Quantum Gates

ISSN Review. Quantum Entanglement Concentration Based on Nonlinear Optics for Quantum Communications

Bayes' theorem and quantum retrodiction. Author. Published. Journal Title DOI. Copyright Statement. Downloaded from. Link to published version

PREPARATION UNCERTAINTY RELATIONS BEYOND HEISENBERG S

and extending this definition to all vectors in H AB by the complex bilinearity of the inner product.

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 30 Sep 2005

Laboratory 1: Entanglement & Bell s Inequalities

On Bell s Joint Probability Distribution Assumption and Proposed Experiments of Quantum Measurement

New schemes for manipulating quantum states using a Kerr cell. Istituto Elettrotecnico Nazionale Galileo Ferraris, Str. delle Cacce 91, I Torino

Ph 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 3 November 2006

Experiment 6 - Tests of Bell s Inequality

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 3 Oct 2000

Jones Matrix Imaging for Transparent and Anisotropic Sample

Top Le# side TEST Right side bo.om

Detection of Single Photon Emission by Hanbury-Brown Twiss Interferometry

Quantum Entanglement and Bell s Inequalities Zachary Evans, Joel Howard, Jahnavi Iyer, Ava Dong, and Maggie Han

UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY. Entanglement Swapping with. Imperfect Sources and Detectors. Regina B. Howard A DISSERTATION

Experimental generating the partially coherent and partially polarized electromagnetic source

Quantum Measurement Uncertainty

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Quantum Optical Communication

Towards quantum metrology with N00N states enabled by ensemble-cavity interaction. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

4. Two-level systems. 4.1 Generalities

arxiv:quant-ph/ v3 5 Feb 2004

Polarization division multiplexing system quality in the presence of polarization effects

Schemes to generate entangled photon pairs via spontaneous parametric down conversion

A review on quantum teleportation based on: Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen channels

Ph 219b/CS 219b. Exercises Due: Wednesday 4 December 2013

Asymptotic Pure State Transformations

Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates

Math 180B Problem Set 3

Supplementary Figure 1 Comparison of single quantum emitters on two type of substrates:

Transcription:

Experimental generalized contextuality with single-photon qubits: supplementary material XIANG ZHAN 1, ERIC G. CAVALCANTI 2, JIAN LI 1, ZHIHAO BIAN 1, YONGSHENG ZHANG 3,4*, HOWARD M. WISEMAN 2,5,, AND PENG XUE 1,6, 1 Department of Physics, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China 2 Centre for Quantum Dynamics, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia 3 Key Laboratory of Quantum Information, University of Science and Technology of China, CAS, Hefei 230026, China 4 Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China 5 Centre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology Australian Research Council), Griffith University, Brisbane 4111, Australia 6 State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China * Corresponding author: yshzhang@ustc.edu.cn Corresponding author: h.wiseman@griffith.edu.au Corresponding author: gnep.eux@gmail.com Published 9 August 2017 This document provides supplementary information to "Experimental generalized contextuality with single-photon qubits," https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.4.000966. We provide the details of the experiment and data analysis. The raw probabilities to demonstrate the joint measurability of positive operator-valued measures POVMs) are also provided. 2017 Optical Society of America https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5219884 1. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ELEMENTS OF THE JOINT POVM G Each element of the POVM can be written as Gɛε ij ξ ij = λ ɛε ɛε ξ ij, with ɛ, ε {+1, 1}, i = j {1, 2, 3}, ɛε and ξ+ ξ + ξ++ ξ ξ+ 13 = λ ++ = λ = 2 η2 ) 4 3η + i 2 + 3η η 2 2 + 3η + η 2 3η + i 2 η η 2 2 η + η 2 2 3η + η 2 ξ + 13 = 3η + i 2 + 3η + η 2 ξ++ 13 = 2 + η + η 2, λ + = λ + = 2 + η2 ), S1) 4 / 8 12η + 8η 2 6η 3 + 2η 4, / 8 + 12η + 8η 2 + 6η 3 + 2η 4, / 8 4η 8η 2 + 2η 3 + 2η 4, / 8 + 4η 8η 2 2η 3 + 2η 4, / 8 12η + 8η 2 6η 3 + 2η 4, / 8 + 12η + 8η 2 + 6η 3 + 2η 4, / 8 4η 8η 2 + 2η 3 + 2η 4,

Supplementary Material 2 ξ 13 = 3η + i 2 η + η 2 / 8 + 4η 8η 2 2η 3 + 2η 4, 12η i 4 8η ξ+ 23 = 2 + η 4 / 22 + η 2 ), 2 + η 2 ξ + 23 = 12η i / 22 + η 2 ), 2 + η 2 ξ++ 23 = i 4 4η 4η 2 + 2η 3 + η 4 / 2 2 + η 2 ), 4 + 4η 4η 2 2η 3 + η 4 ξ 23 = i 4 + 4η 4η 2 2η 3 + η 4 / 2 2 + η 2 ), 4 4η 4η 2 + 2η 3 + η 4 Each element can be implemented by a single-qubit rotation followed by a two-outcome measurement. In the first step, to realize the element + the single-qubit rotation is designed as U + = 0 φ + + 1 φ +, φ ξ ij + = +. S2) The POVM element {P+ 0, P1 + } takes the form P+ 0 = 0 0 + 1 χ + ) 1 1, P+ 1 = χ + 1 1, χ + = λ +. S3) The choice of φ + guarantees if P 1 + clicks the initial state is projected onto the eigenstate ξ ij + and let the component of the state ξ ij + which is orthogonal to ξ ij + all pass through for the next measurement. Therefore the state after the first rotation is U + φ 0 φ 0 U + for any input φ 0. The first detector P+ 1 ) clicks with the probability TrP1 + U + φ 0 φ 0 U + ) = λ + ξ ij ξ ij + φ 0 φ 0 + = Tr + φ 0 φ 0 ). Thus we implement the element of POVM +. The other state without click is P 0 + U + φ 0 = ξ ij + φ 0 0 + 1 χ + ξ ij + φ 0 1. S4) In the second step, to implement the element +, the single-qubit rotation is designed as U + = 0 φ + + 1 φ +, S5) where φ 1 + = ξ ij N + ξij + 0 + 1 χ + ξ ij ) + ξij + 1 S6) + with the normalization factor N +. Compared Eqs. S5) and S7), one can see that we only replace φ 0 in Eq. S5) by ξ ij + in Eq. S7). The second POVM element takes the form {P + 0, P1 + }, where P 0 + = 0 0 + 1 χ + ) 1 1, P 1 + = χ + 1 1, χ + = λ +N 2 + 1 λ +. S7) The parameter χ + is chosen such that after the projector is performed, the probability of the click of P + 1 is that of the measurement + performing on the initial state φ 0. The state after the second qubit rotation is U + P+ 0 U + φ 0 φ 0 U + U +. The second detector P + 1 ) clicks with the probability TrP1 + U +P+ 0 U + φ 0 φ 0 U + U + ) = λ + ξ ij ξ ij + φ 0 φ 0 + = TrG + φ 0 φ 0 ). Thus we implement the element +. The other state without click is P 0 + U + φ 0 P + 0 U + = φ + 0 ξ ij + φ 0 + 1 χ + φ + 1 ξ ij ) + φ 0 0 + 1 χ + φ + 0 ξ ij + φ 0 + 1 χ + φ + 1 ξ ij ) + φ 0 1. S8)

Supplementary Material 3 In the third step, to implement ++ the single-qubit rotation is designed as U ++ = 0 φ ++ + 1 φ ++, S9) where φ 1 [ φ ++ = N + 0 ξ ij + ξij ++ + 1 χ + φ + 1 ξ ij + ξij ++ ) 0 S10) ++ + 1 χ + φ + 0 ξ ij + ξij ++ + 1 χ + φ + 1 ξ ij + ξij ++ ) 1 with the normalization factor N ++. Comparing Eqs. S9) and S11), one can find that we replace φ 0 in Eq. S9) by ξ ij ++ in Eq. S11). The third POVM element takes the form {P++ 0, P1 ++ }, where P 0 ++ = 0 0, P 1 ++ = 1 1. With this setup when the input state is ξ ij ++ the detector P++ 1 ) never clicks. Thus the measurement corresponding to click of P1 ++ is proportional to ξ ij ++ ξ ij ++. We now prove the measurement we implement is exactly ++. Assume the POVM elements corresponding to clicks of P++ 1 ξ and P0 ++ are x ij ++ ξ ij ++ and y ψ ψ. Due to the fact that we have ξ ij realized λ + + ξ ij ξ ij + and λ + + ξ ij +, we have x ξ ij ++ ξ ij ξ ij ++ + y ψ ψ = 1 λ + + ξ ij ξ ij + λ + + ξ ij + ξ ij = λ ++ ++ ξ ij ξ ij ++ λ ξ ij ] S11) S12) Tracing both sides of Eq. S12) leads to x + y = λ ++ + λ, S13) and ξ ij ++ x ξ ij ++ ξ ij ) ξ ij ++ + y ψ ψ ++ = ξ ij ++ ξ ij λ ++ ++ ξ ij ξ ij ++ λ ξ ij ) ξ ij ++ S14) leads to y = λ S15) Then we also have x = λ ++ S16) Thus the POVM element corresponding to the click of P++ 1 is Gij ++ = λ ++ ξ ij ++ ξ ij ++. The POVM element corresponding to the click of P++ 0 is Gij = λ ξ ij ξ ij. 2. THE MEASUREMENT STAGE OF REALIZING JOINT POVMS In the measurement stage, the single-qubit rotations can be realized by a combination of quarter-wave plates QWPs) and half-wave plates HWPs), so-called a sandwich-type QWP-HWP-QWP set, with certain setting angles depending on the parameters of the joint positive operator-valued measure POVM). The setting angles of the wave plates WPs) used to realize the corresponding elements of joint POVMs are shown in Table S1. We employ partially polarizing beam splitters PPBSs) with specific transmission probabilities for vertical polarization T V and same transmission probability for horizontal polarization T H = 1. This allows us to implement the measurement V on the reflected port of the PPBSs. In the basis { H, V}, the single-qubit rotations realized by HWP and QWP are R HWP θ H ) = cos 2θ H sin 2θ H, sin 2θ H cos 2θ H R QWP θ Q ) = cos2 θ Q + i sin 2 θ Q 1 i) sin θ Q cos θ Q, 1 i) sin θ Q cos θ Q sin 2 θ Q + i cos 2 θ Q respectively, where θ H and θ Q are the angles between the optic axes of HWP and QWP and horizontal direction. S17)

Supplementary Material 4 Table S1. The setting angles of WPs and the transmission probabilities for vertical polarization T 12) V of the two PPBSs for realization of joint POVMs. θ Q1 /θ Q2 θ H1 θ Q3 /θ Q4 θ H2 θ Q5 /θ Q6 θ H3 TV 1 TV 2 G 12 7.3 32.9 1.4 29.5 22.4 69.2 0.390445) 0.289750) G 23 21.7 60.2 4.9 36.5 21.7 60.2 0.390445) 0.289750) G 13 7.3 47.5 1.4 32.2 112.4 110.8 0.390445) 0.289750) 3. RELATIVE DETECTION EFFICIENCIES OF DETECTORS After applying joint POVM on the single-photon qubit, the photons are detected by single-photon avalanche photodiodes APDs) on the reflected ports of the two PPBSs, and both reflected and transmitted ports of PBS, in coincidence with the trigger photons. The relative detection efficiencies of the detectors D1-D4 are measured and used to correct the coincidence counts. To measure the relative efficiencies of the different detectors D1, D2, D3 and D4, we make a reasonable assumption that the total number of photons is fixed. We tune the setting angles of WPs to change the photon distribution. That is, for each time after we tune the setting angles of WPs, the normalized number of photons at each output port with respect to the total number of photons is changed, which can be read at the corresponding detector. The readout photon counts at each detector equal to the number of photons at each output port multiplied by the relative efficiency of the corresponding detector. After we tune the setting angles of WPs for four times, we have four linear equations with four variables relative efficiencies of detectors) and then solve them to obtain the relative efficiencies of the detectors D1, D2, D3, and D4. In our experiment, the relative efficiencies of the detectors D1, D2, D3, and D4 are 1, 0.9499 ± 0.0070, 0.9199 ± 0.0069 and 0.9801 ± 0.0063 respectively calculated from the experimental data. Thus we can use the relative efficiencies of the detectors to correct the photon counts in the measurement stage. For example, after the correction the photon counts at D2 which are used to calculate the probability of the photons being measured at D2 should be the readout photon counts divided by the relative efficiency of D2 0.9499 ± 0.0070. 4. JOINT MEASURABILITY OF POVMS. We test the joint measurability of the constructed joint POVM. For different qubit states, we analyze the experimental results of the joint POVM and test whether the marginal condition Xji) = E ij) X is satisfied. Without loss of generality, we choose the four ij) states H, V, R = H + i V)/ 2, and D = H + V)/ 2 as states being measured. The results are shown in Table S2. The measured probabilities Tr Xj ρ) are in agreement with the theoretical predictions of the probabilities TrE X i i ρ) of the POVM element EX i i on the state ρ { H H, V V, R R, D D }, which proves the marginal condition is satisfied. Thus the constructed joint POVM shows the joint measurability.

Supplementary Material 5 Table S2. Experimental results of Xj on the four different single-qubit states compared to the theoretical predictions of the probabilities of E i X i on these states. H V R D G 12 ++ + G12 + 0.835713) 0.160713) 0.499021) 0.495820) G 13 ++ + G13 + 0.835313) 0.169913) 0.500322) 0.502921) E+ 1 Theory) 0.8350 0.1650 0.5000 0.5000 G 12 + + G12 0.164213) 0.839313) 0.500921) 0.504220) G 13 + + G13 0.164713) 0.830113) 0.499722) 0.497121) E 1 Theory) 0.1650 0.8350 0.5000 0.5000 G 12 ++ + G12 + 0.315520) 0.674719) 0.501322) 0.781817) G 23 ++ + G23 + 0.317919) 0.674819) 0.500121) 0.778816) E+ 2 Theory) 0.3325 0.6675 0.5000 0.7901 G 12 + + G12 0.684520) 0.325319) 0.498722) 0.218217) G 23 + + G23 0.682119) 0.325219) 0.499921) 0.221216) E 2 Theory) 0.6675 0.3325 0.5000 0.2099 G 13 ++ + G13 + 0.345421) 0.665219) 0.500822) 0.208316) G 23 ++ + G23 + 0.344820) 0.651921) 0.502022) 0.210217) E+ 3 Theory) 0.3325 0.6675 0.5000 0.2099 G 13 + + G13 0.654621) 0.334819) 0.499222) 0.791716) G 23 + + G23 0.655120) 0.348121) 0.498022) 0.789817) E 3 Theory) 0.6675 0.3325 0.5000 0.7901