C e n t ral Indiana Growing Faster Than Rest of the State

Similar documents
IC ARTICLE 19. DESCRIBING REAL PROPERTY; INDIANA COORDINATE SYSTEM. IC Chapter 1. Designation of Indiana Coordinate System; Zones

Some concepts are so simple

MARKET ANALYSIS FOR DRIED. DISTILLERS GRAINS IN INDIANA a. Dept. of Agricultural Economics. Purdue University

INDIANABUSINESSREVIEW

Maps 1 & 2: Percent Total Rural Population of Missouri Counties Data Source: U.S. Decennial Census, 1980 and 1990

Supporting Tabular Data for 2016 ICP Conservation Accomplishments Program Funding Descriptions - Map on Page 6

September 2005 Climate Summary

DRAFT RURAL-URBAN POPULATION CHANGE IN PUERTO RICO, 1990 TO 2000

FY 2006 County Budget Summary Adopted Budget Summary 4/20/05

Arkansas Retiree In-Migration: A Regional Analysis

Population Profiles

Income Inequality in Missouri 2000

LAND COVER IN OHIO S TOWNSHIPS: AN ANALYSIS OF TOWNSHIP LAND COVER AND POPULATION CHANGE

HORIZON 2030: Land Use & Transportation November 2005

A Case Study of Regional Dynamics of China 中国区域动态案例研究

CENTERS OF POPULATION COMPUTATION for the United States

Population Change. Alessandro Alasia Agriculture Division Statistics Canada. (ICRPS) Summer School 2009

Regional Transit Development Plan Strategic Corridors Analysis. Employment Access and Commuting Patterns Analysis. (Draft)

Spatiotemporal Analysis of Commuting Patterns: Using ArcGIS and Big Data

DEVELOPING A MODEL FOR ACTION:

Assessing spatial distribution and variability of destinations in inner-city Sydney from travel diary and smartphone location data

Rural Alabama. Jennifer Zanoni. Geography Division U.S. Census Bureau. Alabama State Data Center 2018 Data Conference Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Bureau of Economic and Business Research May 29, Measuring Population Density for Counties in Florida

Using the ACS to track the economic performance of U.S. inner cities

Geospatial Analysis of Job-Housing Mismatch Using ArcGIS and Python

IMPORTED FIRE ANT AREAS IN TENNESSEE QUARANTINED AREAS FOR YEAR 2008

Population Trends Along the Coastal United States:

In my discussion, impediments are opportunities in the sense that if you remove the barrier, you move forward.

R E SEARCH HIGHLIGHTS

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

Income Change in Milwaukee s Inner City, A UWM Center for Economic Development Research Update

Rural Pennsylvania: Where Is It Anyway? A Compendium of the Definitions of Rural and Rationale for Their Use

Urban socioeconomic attribute differences in the border areas of Imperial County, California, USA, and Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico

ONE REGION: PLANNING FOR A STRONG AND JUST METROPOLIS. NYLON # 14: Regional Planning. October 31, 2018

Investors Title Insurance Company - Indiana Approved Search Providers

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION SERIES

Analysis of travel-to-work patterns and the identification and classification of REDZs

Operational Definitions of Urban, Rural and Urban Agglomeration for Monitoring Human Settlements

Impressive Growth & Relaxed Elegance.

Research Update: Race and Male Joblessness in Milwaukee: 2008

Spatiotemporal Analysis of Commuting Patterns in Southern California Using ACS PUMS, CTPP and LODES

Census Urban Area Comparisons, 2000 to 2010

CRP 608 Winter 10 Class presentation February 04, Senior Research Associate Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity

The Rural Health Workforce. Policy Brief Series. Data and Issues for Policymakers in: Washington Wyoming Alaska Montana Idaho

Investors Title Insurance Company - Indiana Approved Search Providers

CHANGES IN THE STRUCTURE OF POPULATION AND HOUSING FUND BETWEEN TWO CENSUSES 1 - South Muntenia Development Region

An Introduction to China and US Map Library. Shuming Bao Spatial Data Center & China Data Center University of Michigan

SOUTH COAST COASTAL RECREATION METHODS

Land Use Modeling at ABAG. Mike Reilly October 3, 2011

Appendix: Development Patterns and Design

Summary and Statistical Report of the 2007 Population and Housing Census Results 1

Transit Development Planning: Flagler County Needs Assessment & Implementation Program INTERGOVERNMENTAL MEETING OF FLAGLER COUNTY APRIL 13, 2010

UNCERTAINTY IN THE POPULATION GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM

Democratic Candidates Hillary Clinton

Do the Causes of Poverty Vary by Neighborhood Type?

GIS-Based Analysis of the Commuting Behavior and the Relationship between Commuting and Urban Form

The Spatial Structure of Cities in the United States

Developing Built Environment Indicators for Urban Oregon. Dan Rubado, MPH EPHT Epidemiologist Oregon Public Health Division

Oregon Population Forecast Program Rulemaking Advisory Committee (RAC) Population Research Center (PRC)

November 2010 Climate Summary

submission to plan melbourne

Labor Market Polarization and a Changing Recovery in the Chicago Metropolitan Area

Summary and Implications for Policy

The CRP stresses a number of factors that point to both our changing demographics and our future opportunities with recommendations for:

The Governance of Land Use

What are we like? Population characteristics from UK censuses. Justin Hayes & Richard Wiseman UK Data Service Census Support

MINERAL PRODUCTION IN ILLINOIS IN 1963 DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. W. L Busch CIRCULAR

Methodological Framework for the Metropolitan Power Diffusion Index

PAINT-THE-REGION AND LONG-RANGE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION/LAND USE PLANNING

BROOKINGS May

Accessibility, rurality, remoteness an investigation on the Island of Sardinia, Italy

Assessing Social Vulnerability to Biophysical Hazards. Dr. Jasmine Waddell

GIS Analysis of Crenshaw/LAX Line

The Indiana Data Sharing Initiative and the IndianaMap. Cross-Boundary Collaboration and Partnerships. State of Indiana

"Natural" Cultural Districts and Neighborhood Revitalization

Creation of an Internet Based Indiana Water Quality Atlas (IWQA)

GEORGIA CITIES IN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA METHODOLOGY. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized

Measuring Disaster Risk for Urban areas in Asia-Pacific

Lee County, Alabama 2015 Forecast Report Population, Housing and Commercial Demand

Reducing Vulnerability to Extreme Heat: Science-Policy Interface

Tracey Farrigan Research Geographer USDA-Economic Research Service

A New Approach to Estimating Population Growth Along a Major Arterial Highway.

TOWARDS STRATEGIC SPATIAL PLANNING IN JAMAICA: THE NATIONAL SPATIAL PLAN

Changes in Transportation Infrastructure and Commuting Patterns in U.S. Metropolitan Areas,

The Spatial Structure of Cities: International Examples of the Interaction of Government, Topography and Markets

Valuation of environmental amenities in urban land price: A case study in the Ulaanbaatar city, Mongolia

Culture and Urban Revitalization

International Workshop on Defining and Measuring Metropolitan Regions (Paris, France, 27 th November, 2006)

Spatial Organization of Data and Data Extraction from Maptitude

Transportation and Logistics Planning and Development Mapping Tool

An online data and consulting resource of THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO THE JACK FORD URBAN AFFAIRS CENTER

Technical Memorandum #2 Future Conditions

Energy Use in Homes. A series of reports on domestic energy use in England. Energy Efficiency

Presentation to the National Association of Counties Large Urban County Caucus 2016 Innovation Symposium. New York, NY November 2016

ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS. Population Trends in the 1960s. The Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas (SMSAs) defined

Tons Received at Ohio Material Resource Recovery Facilities

Wasatch Front Region Small Area Socioeconomic Forecasts: Technical Report #49

Number of Child Passenger Safety Instructors by County as of 6/2/2017

New Partners for Smart Growth: Building Safe, Healthy, and Livable Communities Mayor Jay Williams, Youngstown OH

Transcription:

C E N T R A L I N D I A N A U N D E R S T A N D I N G T H E R E G I O N A N D I D E N T I F Y I N G C H O I C E S CENTER FOR URBAN POLICY AND THE ENVIRONMENT MAY 2001 C e n t ral Indiana Growing Faster Than Rest of the State Data from the U.S. Census Bureau s 1980, 1990, and recently released 2000 Decennial Censuses indicate that population growth in Central Indiana has outpaced the growth of the rest of the state. The number of persons residing in Central Indiana has grown from nearly 2.7 million (49 percent of the state) in 1980 to just over 3 million (50 percent of the state) in 2000, a growth of over 300,000 residents. The 13.3 percent population increase in the region over the 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% Figure 1: Population Growth in Central Indiana Relative to Rest of State 1.7% 0.3% 1980 1990 1990 2000 1980 2000 Central Indiana 11.4% past 20 years is 5 percent higher than the rest of Indiana (see Figure 1). During the same period, the state of Indiana, as a whole, experienced population 8.0% 13.3% Rest of Indiana 8.3% growth (10.8 percent) at less than half the average growth rate of the 50 states and the District of Columbia (24.8 percent). Most of the Central Indiana growth occurred between 1990 and 2000 when Central Indiana grew by 312,000 residents and the rest of Indiana grew by only 224,000.

Counties Maintain Population Dominance Total population reported in 2000, as in past censuses, shows the counties with the largest populations in the Central Indiana region are in the s. Figure 2 shows that 14 of the 18 counties are among the top 20 counties in regard to total population. All six of the core counties are among the top 10 highest-populated counties. Marion County has the highest population by a substantial margin at over 860,000 people (28.2 percent of the total region). However, Hamilton County leads the region when measured by share of growth. 2 HAMILTON TIPPECANOE MADISON DELAWARE VIGO HENDRICKS HOWARD WAYNE MORGAN HENRY BOONE SHELBY JACKSON CASS MIAMI PUTNAM CLINTON GREENE RANDOLPH CLAY FAYETTE DECATUR CARROLL ORANGE RUSH FOUNTAIN VERMILLION TIPTON BENTON WARREN UNION Figure 2: Total Population by County (2000) 25,588 25,267 24,555 21,786 21,751 20,165 19,306 18,261 17,954 17,241 16,788 16,577 14,957 9,421 8,419 7,349 48,508 46,107 45,922 43,445 41,335 40,930 37,629 36,082 36,019 33,866 33,157 27,554 27,401 26,556 71,435 71,097 66,689 55,391 105,848 104,093 84,964 133,358 120,563 118,769 115,209 148,955 182,740 Map 1: Total Population by County (2000) 860,454 CORE * CORE NON- NON- * See page 5 for explanation of geographic boundaries Boundaries POPULATION BY COUNTY 7,300 75,000 75,001 185,000 185,001 860,454-100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000

Population Growth in Non-Core Counties Shows Increasing Decentralization From Largest Urban Core Figure 3 illustrates the amount of growth in population from 1990 to 2000. Only six Central Indiana counties lost population over the past decade. Two of the counties losing population are core counties. However, generally, counties experienced the most growth over the past 10 years. Nine of the top 10 counties are counties. Since 1990, the greatest amount of growth occurred in Hamilton County by a margin of 10,509 more people than the next highest county, Marion County. Map 2 shows that many of the high growth areas are located within the Indianapolis. HAMILTON HENDRICKS TIPPECANOE MORGAN BOONE PUTNAM HOWARD JACKSON SHELBY CLINTON GREENE MADISON MADISON CASS CLAY CARROLL DECATUR DECATUR ORANGE TIPTON UNION UNION HENRY RANDOLPH RANDOLPH WARREN FOUNTAIN FOUNTAIN RUSH VERMILLION VERMILLION 15 BENTON VIGO VIGO FAYETTE MIAMI MIAMI WAYNE DELAWARE DELAWARE Figure 3: Population Change by County (1990 2000) 910 897 877 458 373 1,356 369 253 243 146 132 15-20 -259-427 -815-854 -890 3,193 3,138 3,086 2,892 2,758 2,747 2,689 2,517 2,002 1,851 1,831 4,505 4,137 3,893 3,605 5,704 7,960 7,778 11,585 10,769 9,864 18,357 28,376 27,100-10000 0 10000 10,000 20000 20,000 30,000 30000 40000 40,000 50,000 50000 60,000 60000 70,000 70000 80,000 80000 63,295 CORE NON- CORE NON- 73,804 Map 2: Population Change by County (1990 2000) Boundaries CHANGE BY COUNTY -890 0 1 7,100 7,101 73,804 3

Fastest Growing Counties Include and Non- Counties Figure 4 shows the relative rate of county population growth over the past 10 years. None of the top 10 fastest-growing counties in the region are core counties. Four of the top 10 fastest-growing counties are non- counties. Map 3 shows the spatial distribution of counties experiencing high growth rates (areas that grew faster than the entire region s growth rate of 11.4 percent) between 1990 and 2000. This illustration shows that almost all of the fastest-growing counties are the Indianapolis collar counties. Some non- counties also are experiencing higher growth rates. Tippecanoe County was the only core county that experienced a faster growth rate than the entire region. Figure 4: Percent Change by County (1990 2000) HAMILTON HENDRICKS 37.5% 30.8% 26.1% 21.7% BOONE 20.9% MORGAN 19.3% PUTNAM 18.8% 16.5% 14.5% TIPPECANOE 14.1% 12.2% 11.9% 10.6% JACKSON 9.6% CLINTON 9.3% 9.3% GREENE 9.0% 8.6% 7.9% SHELBY 7.8% CLAY 7.5% CARROLL 7.2% 7.2% CASS 6.6% 6.2% UNION 5.3% HOWARD 5.1% ORANGE 4.9% DECATUR 3.8% WARREN 3.0% TIPTON 2.8% MADISON 2.1% RANDOLPH 0.9% FOUNTAIN 0.8% HENRY 0.8% RUSH 0.7% VERMILLION 0.1% BENTON -0.2% -0.2% VIGO -0.2% -0.2% DELAWARE -0.7% WAYNE -1.2% FAYETTE -1.6% MIAMI -2.2% CORE NON- 67.7% CORE NON- Map 3: Percent Change by County (1990 2000) Boundaries PERCENT CHANGE BY COUNT Y -2.2 0% 0.01 11.4% 11.5 67.7% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 4

Central Indiana The center analyzes Central Indiana, consisting of 44 counties, as defined by the Bureau of Economic Analysis based on commuting and media patterns (see Central Indiana: Visions of A Region, Center for Urban Policy and the Environment [2000] for a discussion of Central Indiana definitions). An describes a geographic area consisting of a central city with a population of at least 50,000 surrounded by a densely populated area that is socially and economically integrated. The core county of the includes the central city and the non-core counties are all the other counties within the. These non-core counties are included in an if they meet requirements such as population density and minimum urban population. The Central Indiana region includes six s that consist of a total of 18 counties. The other 26 counties in Central Indiana are non- counties. Future Research The growth of the Central Indiana region and the counties within the region raises questions about the implications of population growth in the region. For example, what are the migration patterns to and from as well as within the region? How does the region compare to similar regions across the nation? These research questions will be addressed in future issue briefs. Metropolitan Statistical Areas (s) Core Counties Counties Non- Counties 5

Central Indiana s Future: Understanding the Region and Identifying Choices The Center for Urban Policy and the Environment has launched a new research project Central Indiana s Future:Understanding the Region and Identifying Choices funded by an award of general support from the Lilly Endowment.The aim of the project is to increase understanding of the region and to inform decision-makers about the array of options for improving the quality of life for Central Indiana residents.researchers from several universities are working to understand how the broad range of investments made by households, governments, businesses, and nonprofit organizations within the Central Indiana Region contribute to quality of life.the geographic scope of the project includes 44 counties in an integrated economic region identified by the U.S.Bureau of Economic Analysis. The number of people who choose to live in a region has varying impacts on the amount of investment in the area by households as well as by the public, private, and nonprofit sectors. Consequently, changes in the types and amounts of investment impact policy choices. Central Indiana,which is experiencing faster population growth than the rest of the state, perhaps faces greater challenges because of this gr owth.these challenges are shared throughout the region because most of the growth in Central Indiana has occurred within the Indianapolis,but the impact is being felt in other counties as well. The Center for Urban Policy and the Environment is part of the School of Public and Environmental Affairs at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis.For more information about the Central Indiana Project or the research reported here, contact the center at 317-261-3000 or visit the center s Web site at www.urbancenter.iupui.edu. Author Seth Payton, policy analyst, Center for Urban Policy and the Environment CENTER FOR URBAN POLICY AND THE ENVIRONMENT 342 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46204-1708 www.urbancenter.iupui.edu INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOLOF PUBLICAND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS INDIANA UNIVERSITY PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS 01-C15