PoS(ICRC2017)195. Measurements of electron and positron fluxes below the geomagnetic cutoff by the PAMELA magnetic spectrometer

Similar documents
Measurements of quasi-trapped electron and positron fluxes with PAMELA

Study of deuteron spectra under radiation belt with PAMELA instrument

PAMELA measurements of solar energetic particle spectra

Available online at ScienceDirect. Physics Procedia 74 (2015 )

PAMELA measurements of the boron and carbon spectra

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 25 Jul 2011

LITHIUM AND BERYLLIUM ISOTOPES IN THE PAMELA-EXPERIMENT

PoS(ICRC2017)1091. The PAMELA Experiment: A Cosmic Ray Experiment Deep Inside the Heliosphere

arxiv: v2 [physics.space-ph] 24 Jan 2018

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.he] 21 Jan 2013

The PAMELA Satellite Experiment: An Observatory in Space for Particles, Antiparticles and Nuclei in the Cosmic Rays

Results from the PAMELA Space Experiment

Time variations of proton flux in the Earth inner radiation belt for years based on the PAMELA and the ARINA data

PAMELA: a Satellite Experiment for Antiparticles Measurement in Cosmic Rays

Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Firenze and Physics Department of University of Florence Firenze, Italy

PAMELA satellite: fragmentation in the instrument

Geomagnetically trapped light isotopes observed with the detector NINA

Introduction to Cosmic Rays Data Analysis Issues. Nicola De Simone INFN and University of Rome Tor Vergata

Search for dark matter particles in space: International experiments PAMELA and GAMMA-400

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 28 Oct 2008

P A M E L A Payload for Antimatter / Matter Exploration and Light-nuclei Astrophysics

The South Atlantic Anomaly drift on the proton flux data of satellite experiments

a Payload for Antimatter Matter Exploration and Light nuclei Astrophysics

Indirect Dark Matter search in cosmic rays. F.S. Cafagna, INFN Bari

Latitudinal and radial gradients of galactic cosmic ray protons in the inner heliosphere PAMELA and Ulysses observations

Antiparticle detection in space for dark matter search: the PAMELA experiment.

The space mission PAMELA

PoS(Scineghe2014)007 THE GAMMA-400 SPACE OBSERVATORY: STATUS AND PERSPECTIVES. O. Adriani, on behalf of the GAMMA-400 collaboration

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 28 Oct 2008

The PAMELA space experiment

PAMELA Five Years of Cosmic Ray Observation from Space

Cosmic Ray Studies with PAMELA Experiment

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 2 Jul 2009

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 22 Jul 2011

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Status of the PAMELA silicon tracker

Antimatter in Space. Mirko Boezio INFN Trieste, Italy. PPC Torino July 14 th 2010

Pitch angle distribution of trapped energetic protons and helium isotope nuclei measured along the Resurs-01 No. 4 LEO satellite

PoS(IDM2010)013. Antiproton and Electron Measurements and Dark Matter Searches in Cosmic Rays. Piergiorgio Picozza.

1 The beginning of Cosmic Ray Physics, the balloons BACKGROUND REJECTION AND DATA ANALYSIS. Aldo Morselli a and Piergiorgio Picozza a.

Leptons with E > 200 MeV trapped in the Earth s radiation belts

The NUCLEON Space Experiment Preliminary Results. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, , Russia

Five Years of PAMELA in orbit

Zero degree neutron energy spectra measured by LHCf at s = 13 TeV proton-proton collision

Launch and commissioning of the PAMELA experiment on board the Resurs-DK1 satellite

GAMMA-400 SPACE OBSERVATORY

Momentum spectra of atmospheric pions, muons, electrons and positrons at balloon altitudes

Trapped positron flux formation in the innermost magnetosphere of the Earth

Payload for Antimatter Matter Exploration and Light-nuclei Astrophysics. PAMELA MissioN 17 December 2010 Prepared by FatiH KAYA

Part 1 Pamela Detector Results and performancies

Primary cosmic ray mass composition above 1 PeV as measured by the PRISMA-YBJ array

Solar Energetic Particles measured by AMS-02

Available online at ScienceDirect. Physics Procedia 74 (2015 )

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 15 Jan 2002

PAMELA SPACE MISSION

Measurements of Heavy Nuclei with the CALET Experiment

PoS(ICRC2017)1076. Studies of Cosmic-Ray Proton Flux with the DAMPE Experiment

PoS(ICRC2017)297. Modeling of the Earth atmosphere ionization by a galactic cosmic ray protons with RUSCOSMICS. Speaker. Maurchev E.A. Balabin Yu.V.

Cosmic Ray panorama. Pamela.roma2.infn.it PAMELA (2012) Experimental challenges : e + /p ~ 10-3 e + /e - ~ 10-1

On behalf of Oscar Larsson, KTH and Marco Casolino, RIKEN & INFN sect. Roma Tor Vergata with the ALTCRISS collab:

The Electromagnetic Imaging Calorimeter of PAMELA

Justin Vandenbroucke (KIPAC, Stanford / SLAC) for the Fermi LAT collaboration

Launch of the space experiment PAMELA

Characteristics of Forbush decreases measured by means of the new scintillation muon hodoscope ScMH

PoS(ICRC2017)775. The performance of DAMPE for γ-ray detection

The GILDA mission: a new technique for a gamma-ray telescope in the energy range 20 MeV GeV

Determination of parameters of cascade showers in the water calorimeter using 3D-distribution of Cherenkov light

Silicon Detectors for the Search of Cosmic Antimatter and Dark Matter

High-energy Gamma Rays detection with the AMS-02 electromagnetic calorimeter. F. Pilo for the AMS-02 ECAL Group INFN Sezione di Pisa, Italy

Precision measurements of nuclear CR energy spectra and composition with the AMS-02 experiment

A Search for Cosmic-ray Proton Anisotropy with the Fermi Large Area Telescope

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 3 Feb 2014

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 20 Jul 2001

2 Subject headings: Silicon Detector Cosmic rays, Isotope Composition, Energy Spectrum, Satellite, 1. Introduction With the launch of the telescope NI

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 21 Jun 2001

Chapter 6.2: space based cosmic ray experiments. A. Zech, Instrumentation in High Energy Astrophysics

Heliospheric modulation of galactic cosmic rays: Effective energy of ground-based detectors

PoS(ICRC2017)168. PSD performance and charge reconstruction with DAMPE

Current and Future balloon and space experiments L. Derome (LPSC Grenoble) Tango, May 4-6th, 2009

PoS(ICRC2017)368. KLYPVE-EUSO: Science and UHECR observational capabilities

Lomonosov Moscow State University. NUCLEON Chemical Composition and Energy Spectra of Cosmic Rays at TeV

Geomagnetic cutoff simulations for low-energy cosmic rays

Evaluation of Galactic Cosmic Rays Models Using AMS2 Data. Francis F. Badavi 1. Christopher J. Mertens 2 Tony C. Slaba 2

November 2013 analysis of high energy electrons on the Japan Experimental Module (JEM: Kibo)

Simulation and data analysis with the BGO-OD experiment

Dark Matter Particle Explorer: The First Chinese Cosmic Ray and Hard γ-ray Detector in Space

Indirect Dark Matter Detection

Measurement of absolute energy scale of ECAL of DAMPE with geomagnetic rigidity cutoff

A Galaxy in VHE Gamma-rays: Observations of the Galactic Plane with the H.E.S.S. array

Complex set of cosmic rays monitoring

Antiproton Flux and Antiproton-to-Proton Flux Ratio in Primary Cosmic Rays Measured with AMS on the Space Station

Experimental review of high-energy e e + and p p spectra

Study of Solar Gamma Rays basing on Geant4 code

GRAINE Project: a balloon-borne emulsion gamma-ray telescope

GenerationofSecondaryElectronsandPositronsintheNearEarthSpaceEnvironmentfromtheDataofExperimentsPAMELAFERMIandAMS

hep-ex/ May 1999

Dark Matter Searches with AMS-02. AMS: Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer

Gamma-Ray Astronomy with a Wide Field of View detector operated at Extreme Altitude in the Southern Hemisphere.

Neutral particles energy spectra for 900 GeV and 7 TeV p-p collisions, measured by the LHCf experiment

Fluxes of Galactic Cosmic Rays

Transcription:

Measurements of electron and positron fluxes below the geomagnetic cutoff by the PAMELA magnetic spectrometer 1, O. Adriani 2,3, G. C. Barbarino 4,5, G. A. Bazilevskaya 6, R. Bellotti 7,8, M. Boezio 9, E. A. Bogomolov 10, M. Bongi 11,3, V. Bonvicini 9, S. Bottai 3, A. Bruno 7,8, F. Cafagna 8, D. Campana 5, P. Carlson 12, M. Casolino 13,14, G. Castellini 13, C. De Donato 13, C. De Santis 15, V. di Felice 11,13, A. M. Galper 1, A. V. Karelin 1, S. V. Koldashov 1, S. A. Koldobskiy 1, S. Y. Krutkov 10, A. N. Kvashnin 6, A. A. Leonov 1,V. V. Malakhov 1, L. Marcelli 15, M. Martucci 15,16, A. G. Mayorov 1, W. Menn 17, M. Merge 13,15, Y. V. Mikhailova 1, E. Mocchiutti 9,A. Monaco 7,8, N. Mori 3, R. Munini 9, G. Osteria 5, B. Panico 5 P. Papini 3, M. Pearce 12, P. Picozza 13,15, M. Ricci 16, S. B. Ricciarini 18, M. Simon 17, R. Sparvoli 13,15, P. Spillantini 2,3, Y. I. Stozhkov 6, A. Vacchi 9,19, E. Vannuccini 3, G. I. Vasilyev 10, S. A. Voronov 1, Y. T. Yurkin 1, G. Zampa 9, N. Zampa 9 1 National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, RU-115409 Moscow 2 University of Florence, Department of Physics, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy 3 INFN, Sezione di Florence, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy 4 University of Naples Federico II, Department of Physics, I-80126 Naples, Italy 5 INFN, Sezione di Naples, I-80126 Naples, Italy 6 Lebedev Physical Institute, RU-119991, Moscow, Russia 7 University of Bari, Department of Physics, I-70126 Bari, Italy 8 INFN, Sezione di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy 9 INFN, Sezione di Trieste I-34149 Trieste, Italy 10 Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, RU-194021 St. Petersburg, Russia 11 Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI) Science Data Center, I-00044 Frascati, Italy 12 KTH and the Oskar Klein Centre, AlbaNova University Centre, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden 13 INFN, Sezione di Rome Tor Vergata, I-00133 Rome, Italy 14 RIKEN, Advanced Science Institute, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan 15 University of Rome Tor Vergata, Department of Physics, I-00133 Rome, Italy 16 INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Via Enrico Fermi 40, I-00044 Frascati, Italy 17 Universität Siegen, Department of Physics, D-57068 Siegen, Germany 18 IFAC, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy 19 University of Udine, Department of Mathematics and Informatics, I-33100 Udine, Italy E-mail: vvmikhajlov@mephi.ru c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). http://pos.sissa.it/

We present a measurements of electron and positron fluxes below the geomagnetic cutoff rigidity in wide energy range from 50 MeV to several GeVs by the PAMELA magnetic spectrometer. The instrument was launched on June 15th 2006 on-board the Resurs-DK satellite on low orbit with 70 degrees inclination and altitude between 350 and 600 km. Features of spatial distributions of secondary electrons and positrons in the near Earth space, including the South Atlantic Anomaly, were investigated in terms of lifetime and geographical origin. The separation in stably trapped, long lifetime quasi-trapped, and short lifetime albedo components was performed on base of back tracing procedure in geomagnetic field. A significant difference in relative abundance of positrons with respect to electrons is seen for the stable trapped and the quasi-trapped populations what pointing out on differences in trapping mechanism of those populations. 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference ICRC2017 10 20 July, 2017 Bexco, Busan, Korea Speaker.

1. Introduction Electrons and positrons produced by inelastic cosmic ray interactions with residual atmosphere execute their trajectories in the Earth magnetic field. Secondary electrons and positrons may perform many oscillations from one hemisphere to other and drift around the Earth in longitude direction. Flux of such secondary electrons was first calculated in paper [1]. This mechanism was confirmed in several experiments starting from seventieth. More modern Monte-Carlo simulation also were undertaken to explain results of AMS-01 experiments [2], e.g. [4, 3]. It was shown that well-known East -West effect leads to positron excess in near equatorial region for quasitrapped and trapped components from this source. This work presents PAMELA spectrometer measurements of secondaries electrons and positrons under geomagnetic cut-off. The magnetic spectrometer PAMELA was launched on board the Resurs-DK1 satellite on the 15th of June 2006 and it was continuously taking data till 23 January 2016. The satellite had a quasi-polar (70 0 inclination) elliptical orbit at an altitudes between 350 and 600 km. After September 2010 the orbit was changed to circular with altitude 570 km. Preliminary results of PAMELA observations of secondary electron and positron fluxes near the Earth, which were made in first years of the flight, were reported in papers [5, 7]. New approach based on analysis of particles trajectories in the Earth magnetosphere allows to separate stably trapped component of secondary electrons and positrons from quasitrapped (less then one drift around the Earth) and re-entrant albedo (only one oscillation between mirror points) components. Preliminary results pointed out on possible different origin of trapped and quasi-trapped species. In this work additional data set was added at low energy with improved data selection. Energy interval was enlarged till 70 MeV and it allows to study secondary electrons and positrons generation and propagation in magnetosphere with more details. 2. PAMELA spectrometer The PAMELA instrument consists of a Time-of-Flight system (TOF), an anticoincidence system (AC), a magnetic spectrometer, an electromagnetic imaging calorimeter, a shower tail catching scintillator and a neutron detector (ND). The TOF system gives the main trigger for particle acquisition, measures the value of the particle charge and its flight time while crossing the apparatus (the resolution is about 0.35 ns). A rigidity is determined by the magnetic spectrometer, composed by a permanent magnet with a magnetic field intensity 0.4 T and a tracker with six micro-strip silicon planes. The electron and positron identification is provided by the calorimeter, a series of X-Y strip silicon layers interleaved by 22 tungsten planes (16.3 radiation and 0.6 nuclear interaction lengths deep). Particles not cleanly entering the PAMELA acceptance are rejected by the anticoincidence system. Using of the TOF, the magnetic spectrometer, neutron detector and the calorimeter information allows identification of electrons and positrons and measuring their energy from 100 MeV to several hundred GeV with high efficiency. The satellite had three axises stabilization and the PAMELA instrument was pointed mainly to a local zenith. The acceptance is about 21.6 cm 2 sr [6]. 2

Figure 1: Examples calculated trajectories of electrons and positrons detected during several orbits 3. Data Analysis Electrons and positrons were identified using information about de/dx energy losses in the spectrometer planes to determine charge Z =1, shower properties in the electromagnetic calorimeter, particle velocity β 1 and a sign rigidity. The misidentification of protons and secondary pions is the main source of background. The rejection power based on combination the calorimeter data, rigidity, β and ND data is about 10 4-10 5 for protons and pions, keeping 70-80% efficiency of the electrons or positrons in energy range above 400 MeV. At low energy particles cross only few calorimeter planes and more strict cuts have to be applied to data from TOF, AC, ND and tracker. Total accumulated statistic for electrons and positron is about 4x10 6 in whole energy range both for primary and secondary particles. Using known geographical coordinates and orientation of the PAMELA instrument along the satellite orbit, the McIlvain geomagnetic coordinates L-shell and B were calculated for every event. For the calculation the IGRF model(http: //nssdcftp.gsfc.nasa.gov/models/geomagnetic/igrf) of the Earth magnetic field was used. To determine origin of detected particles the backtracing procedure was applied for every identified events to obtain their trajectories in the Earth magnetosphere before detection. The tracing was stopped if particles touched the Earth atmosphere on 40 km altitude or escaped magnetosphere. Escaping boundary was chosen to be 20000 km. In present analysis maximal time of tracing was 50 s that corresponds to drift time of 70 MeV electrons around the Earth. MSIS mode (https://ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov)l was used to determine the thickness of the traversed matter in the atmosphere. Trajectory analysis allows to determine particle origin for every individual event. Figure 1 shows examples calculated trajectories of electrons and positrons detected during several orbits. Totally about 2x10 6 events were backtraced. 3

[a] Figure 2: Regions where positrons were detected. Figure (a) shows primary particles. Figure (b) shows re-entrant albedo. Typically galactic particles reach the satellite orbit for time less then 0.1 second from the boundary of the magnetosphere. But if electron or positron rigidity is just slightly lower geomagnetic cut-off rigidity this time may increase dramatically up to 1 s due to prolonged chaotic motions in the Earth magnetic field. Secondary re-entrant albedo have a peak near 0.1 second corresponding to particles motion along magnetic field lines from one hemisphere to the other. A long time intervals correspond to quasitrapped particles performing many oscillations. Drift time increases with decreasing of particles rigidity. There is alsofraction of particles with very long lifetime which make many drift motions around the Earth. Figures 2 and 3 show geographical coordinates detected positrons of different origin. Primary particles are observed mainly in polar regions and above cut-off rigidity near equator (figure 2a). This component consist of mainly electrons. Secondary albedo component with small pitch-angles is observed below geomagnetic cut-off for all latitudes (figure 2b) and quasitrapped and trapped particles can be measured near equator and in South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) (figure 3). Maximum of count rate of trapped component is observed at L-shell about 1.18 and it is increasing with local magnetic field B decreasing below 0.215 G. Inside this region positron to electron ratio is maximal near West part of the South Atlantic Anomaly. Finally, primary electrons and positrons with high rigidity R were excluded from analysis together with particles in transition region near geomagnetic cut-off, applying condition R< 10/L 3 [GV], where L is geomagnetic L-shell. [b] 4. Results and Discussion Due to high accumulated statistic the experimental data show very detail dependence of electron and positron fluxes on particle energy in different spatial regions near the Earth. Figure 4 shows obtained in PAMELA experiment positron to electron e + /e ratio for quasitrapped, reentrant and stably trapped particles. Results for albedo and quasitrapped particles are in agreement with AMS-01 data. Calculations in paper [4, 3] shows that well-known East -West effect leads 4

[a] Figure 3: Regions where captured by the Earth magnetic field positrons were detected. Figure (a) shows quasitrapped particles. Figure (b) shows stably trapped particles. to positron excess in near equatorial region for quasitrapped and trapped components from cosmic ray interaction with residual atmosphere. Surprisingly, positron fraction of trapped particles is much smaller then for quasitrapped component and more close to albedo one. This result also difficult to explained by additional productions of electrons and positrons inside radiation belt by trapping protons interactions. As it was calculated in paper [4] this mechanism produces mainly low energy E<100 MeV positrons. Figure 5 presents count rates of trapped electrons and positrons in central part of SAA (right) where B<0.2 G and near border of the region 0.2<B<0.23 G (left) at L-hell 1.18. With more deep entering into radiation belt positron fraction is decreasing and electrons begin to prevail. [b] Figure 4: Positron to electron e + /e ratio for quasitrapped, re-entrant and stably trapped particles. 5

[a] Figure 5: Trapped positron and electron count rate vs energy. Figure (a) shows region B>0.2 G. Figure (b) shows region B<0.2 G. 5. Summary Secondary electron and positron fluxes have complex spatial structure caused by geomagnetic field, production cross-section and atmospheric absorption. Measured in the PAMELA experiment fluxes of electrons and positrons point out on differences in production or trapping mechanisms for stably trapped into inner radiation belts particles and quasitrapped particles on low edge of the belt. 6. Acknowlegments We acknowledge support from the Italian Space Agency (ASI) under the program "Programma PAMELA - attivita scientifica di analisi dati in fase E, Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), the Russian Ministry of Education and Science (project No.3.2131.2017), Russian Federal Space Agency, V. M. thanks for the support from National Research Nuclear University MEPhI in the framework of the Russian Academic Excellence Project (contract No. 02.a03.21.0005, 27.08.2013) [b] References [1] N.L. Grigorov, Paper of AS USSR, 1977 (24) 810. [2] J. Alcaraz, et al. [AMS01 collaboration] Phys. Lett. B, 2000 (484) 10. [3] L. Derome, M. Buenerd, and Y. Liu, Phys. Lett. B, 2001 (515) 1. [4] A.A. Gusev, U.B. Jayanthet, I.M. Martin et al., Journal of Geophys. Res. 2001 (106) 11 A26111 [5] O. Adriani et al.[pamela collaboration],journal of Geophys. Res. 2009 A12218 doi:10.1029/2009ja014660 [6] P. Picozza, A.M. Galper, G. Castellini et al.[pamela collaboration], Astropart. Phys. 2007 (27) 296-315 [7] O.Adriani et al.[pamela collaboration],phys.rep. 2014 (544) 4 323-370 doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2014.06.003 6