DELINEATION OF CATCHMENT BOUNDARY FOR FLOOD PRONE AREA: A CASE STUDY OF PEKAN TOWN AREA

Similar documents
SUB CATCHMENT AREA DELINEATION BY POUR POINT IN BATU PAHAT DISTRICT

FLOOD HAZARD AND RISK ASSESSMENT IN MID- EASTERN PART OF DHAKA, BANGLADESH

FLOOD PLAIN SIMULATION MODEL BY INTEGRATION OF SURVEYING PACKAGES AND GIS

Application of high-resolution (10 m) DEM on Flood Disaster in 3D-GIS

Use of Geospatial data for disaster managements

River Inundation and Hazard Mapping a Case Study of North Zone Surat City

Vulnerability of Flood Hazard in Selected Ayeyarwady Delta Region, Myanmar

Floodplain Modeling and Mapping Using The Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Hec-RAS/Hec-GeoRAS Applications. Case of Edirne, Turkey.

M14/3/GEOGR/SP2/ENG/TZ0/XX/Q GEOGRAPHY STANDARD LEVEL PAPER 2. Monday 19 May 2014 (morning) 1 hour 20 minutes INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

Grant 0299-NEP: Water Resources Project Preparatory Facility

USING 3D GIS TO ASSESS ENVIRONMENTAL FLOOD HAZARDS IN MINA

4 th Joint Project Team Meeting for Sentinel Asia 2011

FLOOD HAZARD MAPPING OF DHAKA-NARAYANGANJ-DEMRA (DND) PROJECT USING GEO-INFORMATICS TOOLS

THE 3D SIMULATION INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING THE FLOODING LOST IN KEELUNG RIVER BASIN

Modelling and Simulation of Floods in Barsa River near Pasakha, Bhutan. Kirtan Adhikari

Flood map of Tupai River using combined 1D and 2D modeling

River bank erosion risk potential with regards to soil erodibility

Outline. Remote Sensing, GIS and DEM Applications for Flood Monitoring. Introduction. Satellites and their Sensors used for Flood Mapping

DEVELOPMENT OF FLOOD HAZARD VULNERABILITY MAP FOR ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT

Flood management in Namibia: Hydrological linkage between the Kunene River and the Cuvelai Drainage System: Cuvelai-Etosha Basin

Flood Risk Map Based on GIS, and Multi Criteria Techniques (Case Study Terengganu Malaysia)

ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY

Natural Disasters in Member Countries (2002 Summary)

SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF FLOODING IN DIRE DAWA, ETHIOPIA

Flash Flood Guidance System On-going Enhancements

3/3/2013. The hydro cycle water returns from the sea. All "toilet to tap." Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e

HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES EVALUATIONS FOR SG. LUI WATERSHED

Impact of Climate Change on Riverbank Erosion

Word Cards. 2 map. 1 geographic representation. a description or portrayal of the Earth or parts of the Earth. a visual representation of an area

Flood Hazard Vulnerability Mapping Using Remote Sensing and GIS: A Case Study of Surat Dhruvesh KM 1*, Praful MU 2 and Aditya MV 1 1

Flood risk mapping for Pari River incorporating sediment transport

An analysis on the relationship between land subsidence and floods at the Kujukuri Plain in Chiba Prefecture, Japan

Study on Characteristics of Sediment and Sedimentation Rate at Sungai Lembing, Kuantan, Pahang

CENTRAL TEXAS HILL COUNTRY FLOOD

Interpretive Map Series 24

Coastal Vulnerability Assessment in Semarang City, Indonesia Based on Sea Level Rise and Land Subsidence Scenarios

Recent development of the National Hydro-Meteorological Service (NHMS) of Viet Nam for disaster risk reduction

Flash flood disaster in Bayangol district, Ulaanbaatar

SECTION II Hydrological risk

Determination of Urban Runoff Using ILLUDAS and GIS

GEOGRAPHY. In relation to the above aims, candidates should, after completing this syllabus, be able to

Urban Morphology at Lowland Environment in Palembang

Climate Adaptation Challenges for Boston s Water and Sewer Systems

VINCENT COOPER Flood Hazard Mapping Consultant

Flood Modeling using Gis and LiDAR of Padada River in Southeastern Philippines

A SIMPLE GIS METHOD FOR OBTAINING FLOODED AREAS

URBAN WATERSHED RUNOFF MODELING USING GEOSPATIAL TECHNIQUES

ABSTRACT. Keywords: Flood hazard mapping, hydro-geomorphic method, hydrologic modelling method, return period, rainfall runoff inundation.

Understanding Urban Development at Lowland Environment

Height Above Nearest Drainage in Houston THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN

GENERAL. CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF THE GUIDELINES Background of the Guidelines Purpose of the Guidelines...

FLOODPLAIN MAPPING OF RIVER KRISHNANA USING HEC-RAS MODEL AT TWO STREACHES NAMELY KUDACHI AND UGAR VILLAGES OF BELAGAVI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA

Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment And Financing Initiative

Floods Lecture #21 20

Initiative. Country Risk Profile: papua new guinea. Better Risk Information for Smarter Investments PAPUA NEW GUINEA.

Geo-spatial Analysis for Prediction of River Floods

Workshop on Drought and Extreme Temperatures: Preparedness and Management for Sustainable Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery

Effects of input DEM data spatial resolution on Upstream Flood modeling result A case study in Willamette river downtown Portland

Haiti and Dominican Republic Flash Flood Initial Planning Meeting

Quick Response Report #126 Hurricane Floyd Flood Mapping Integrating Landsat 7 TM Satellite Imagery and DEM Data

DOWNLOAD OR READ : GIS BASED FLOOD LOSS ESTIMATION MODELING IN JAPAN PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Impact of Tropical Cyclones - Malaysia's Experience

Effect of land use/land cover changes on runoff in a river basin: a case study

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

Progress Report. Flood Hazard Mapping in Thailand

MODELLING FROST RISK IN APPLE TREE, IRAN. Mohammad Rahimi

THE APPLICATION OF VISIBLE IMAGES FROM METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE (METSAT) FOR THE RAINFALL ESTIMATION IN KLANG RIVER BASIN

Hydro-engineers.ch HEC-RAS ANALAYSIS. River: L Aïre Mesfin Tewolde. Hydro-engineers.ch 23 oct. 2017

International Journal Of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 7, Issue 7, July ISSN

EFFECT OF TWO SUCCESIVE CHECK DAMS ON DEBRIS FLOW DEPOSITION

CHAPTER 3: DATA ACQUISITION AND ANALYSIS. The research methodology is an important aspect of research to make a study results

Flood hazard mapping in Urban Council limit, Vavuniya District, Sri Lanka- A GIS approach

Experimental Study on Effect of Houses on Debris-Flow Flooding and Deposition in Debris Flow Fan Areas

Integrated and Multi-Hazard Disaster Management

Report for Area Drainage Studies for 1320 MW (2x660 MW) THERMAL POWER PROJECT AT MIRZAPUR, U.P.

Monitoring Coastal Change after the Tsunami in Thailand

Modeling Great Britain s Flood Defenses. Flood Defense in Great Britain. By Dr. Yizhong Qu

Dr. S.SURIYA. Assistant professor. Department of Civil Engineering. B. S. Abdur Rahman University. Chennai

Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment And Financing Initiative

Sedimentation in the Nile River

Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment And Financing Initiative

Notes: We all know that Toulmins Spring Branch is a sub-watershed of Three Mile Creek watershed. Some part of it is in Mobile area and rest of it is

Indexing vulnerability of an embankment reach against breaching: A remote sensing and hydrodynamic based study

N05/3/GEOGR/HP2/ENG/TZ0/XX/Q GEOGRAPHY HIGHER LEVEL PAPER 2. Monday 7 November 2005 (morning) 2 hours 30 minutes INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

Outline of Guideline for Development and Utilization of Tsunami Disaster Management Map

Welcome to NetMap Portal Tutorial

Chapter 5 CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION

Delimiting the Flood Risk Zones in Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu, India

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

Measuring Disaster Risk for Urban areas in Asia-Pacific

Gully erosion and associated risks in the Tutova basin Moldavian Plateau

CLIMATE READY BOSTON. Climate Projections Consensus ADAPTED FROM THE BOSTON RESEARCH ADVISORY GROUP REPORT MAY 2016

Report. Developing a course component on disaster management

GEOMATICS. Shaping our world. A company of

8 Current Issues and Research on Sediment Movement in the River Catchments of Japan

ESTIMATION OF LANDFORM CLASSIFICATION BASED ON LAND USE AND ITS CHANGE - Use of Object-based Classification and Altitude Data -

IJESRT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES & RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY

ERA-NET CRUE Funding Initiative. Risk Assessment and Risk Management in Small Urban Catchments

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

DEM-based Ecological Rainfall-Runoff Modelling in. Mountainous Area of Hong Kong

Transcription:

Proceedings of the 5 th IYRW 2017, Kuantan, Malaysia DELINEATION OF CATCHMENT BOUNDARY FOR FLOOD PRONE AREA: A CASE STUDY OF PEKAN TOWN AREA OW YU ZEN (1), NOOR ASIAH MOHAMAD (1), IDRUS AHMAD (2) (1) Faculty of Engineering Technology. Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pahang, Malaysia, noorasiah@ump.edu.my (2) Department of Irrigation and Drainage Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia ABSTRACT Pekan town is located in the downstream of Pahang River Basin. It is frequently hit by flood. The most recent major flood in Pekan town occurred from December 2007 to January 2008. Pekan Flood Mitigation Project was implemented by the government with the total protected area of 2,500 ha. Flood Wall were constructed along Pahang Riverside to protect the overflow of the river whereas flood bunds were constructed surrounding the Pekan town to protect the overflow of swamp water from the southern area into the town. While internal drain within the protected area is channeled to flow into the South China Sea via the main monsoon drain. The northwest of Pekan town which is located outside the protected area is still hit by flood. The major infrastructures in the northwest of Pekan town consist of hospital, mosque, local industry and residential area. The main causes of the flood in the northwest of Pekan town are due to the overflow of Pahang River and swamp surrounding the area. Flood mitigation measure should be carried out to protect the area. The objective of this research is to delineate the catchment boundary of the flood prone area in the northwest of Pekan Town as part of the flood mitigation study. This research is also aimed to identify the discharge point for the catchment area. Contour lines were extracted from ASTER DEM using ArcGIS and the existing drainage networks were identified based on topographic map. ASTER DEM was used as the best accessible data available for this study. The layout of current drainage networks was verified during the site visit. There were three major drainages in the study area namely Genuk River, West Drain and main drain along the road connecting Pekan town to Muadzam Shah. Based on the layout of current drainage network and contour, it is found that the study area can be divided into two polders (upstream and downstream) with the total area of 1,500 ha. The upstream polder lies on the upstream of Genuk River catchment which are generally flat and swampy. Runoff from the upstream catchment flow into three major drainages mentioned earlier before finally discharged into Pahang River via Genuk River. The downstream catchment lies on the downstream of Genuk River. Runoff from this catchment flow into Genuk River and the main drain before discharged into Pahang River. As noted earlier, the study area in the northwest of Pekan town can be divided into upstream and downstream catchment. Both catchments discharge runoff to Pahang River via Genuk River. Flood mitigation work should be planned considering the two polder areas identified in this study. Further work can be done to extract contour from higher resolution data to improve the result. Keywords: Pekan Flood; Pahang River; Catchment Boundary. 1. INTRODUCTION The strategic geography location of Malaysia has set Malaysia free from natural disasters such as earthquake, volcanoes and typhoons. However, floods are most hazardous disaster which affecting most of the states in Peninsular Malaysia which affect 4.9 million people and inflict damage worth of several million every year in Malaysia (Mohit & Sellu, 2013). Flood occurrences seems to be getting more frequent in recent years, especially in some cities such as Kuala Lumpur, Penang and Kuching, where rapid urbanization is taking place (Ghani et. al., 2012). In the past decades, several types of flooding and causes of flooding in Malaysia were identified; they are extensive basin flood (riverbank overflow), inundation basin flood (backwater effect from tidal influence affecting lower reaches), inland flood (poor drainage from inland flood prone area) and urban flash flood (inadequate drainage and storage systems to cater for rapid urbanization (Abdullah, 2007). Various measures can be adopted to manage rainwater as part of the flood mitigation approach (N. A. A. Ghani, Mohamad, & Hui, 2006; Needhidasan & Nallanathel, 2013) Several monsoon floods occurred in the last few decades in Pahang River basin. It had caused heavy damage to the community in Pahang. According to the records of past floods, Pahang River basin suffers from flood damage during January 1971 and the scale of January 1971 flood is over the 100-year ARI based on the hydrology probability analysis using the mean 8-day rainfall record (DID, 1974). Next, the flood incidents was followed by November 1988 December 2007, December 2014 (Ghani et. al., 2016). The most recent one happened on January 2017. Pekan is one of the main towns located at the banks of the Pahang River. Pahang River Basin lies in the Malaysia Peninsular between latitude 2 48'45" - 3 40' 24"N and longitude 101 16' 31" - 103 29' 34"E (Tekolla, 2010). The total area of the basin is 27000km 2 and the length of the river is estimated to be 440km (Tan & Mokhtar, 2009) Sungai Pahang originates from Kuala Tembeling at the confluence of two equally large and long 1

rivers, about 304 km from the river mouth in the central north, the Sungai Jelai emerges from the Titiwangsa Range at the northwestern tip of the Sungai Pahang Basin, while the Sungai Tembeling originates from the Timur Range at the northeastern edge of the basin (Ghani, et. al., 2016). The upstream of the Pahang river basin is located at Jerantut, while Temerloh is the location where the midstream occurred and lastly downstream is located at Pekan whereas the river discharge into South China Sea (Elfithri et al., 2015; Yasuto et. al., 2004). (Figure 1) main monsoon drain. After the completion of flood mitigation project in 2007, the flood event in Pekan Town has been resolved. However, the unprotected area at the northwest of Pekan Town was still hit by major flood on year 2007. Heavy rainfall had caused the overflow of the Pahang River and swamp water flow into the northwest area of Pekan Town. This issue had been raised among the communities and the local government on solving the flood in unprotected area. Therefore, resolving the flood event in the northwest of Pekan Town had come to be one of the significant aim of conducting site study on flood prone area. With the above background, this study intends to delineate the catchment boundary of the flood prone area in the northwest of Pekan Town as part of the flood mitigation study. This study is also carried out to identify the discharge point for the catchment area. Hence, both objectives of this study are aimed to produce primary sources for site studies purpose. 2. STUDY AREA Figure 1: Pahang River Basin (Ghani et. al., 2012) Pekan is the main district in Pahang River Basin whereas the place of downstream occurred. The geographical features and location of Pekan at the downstream of Pahang River Basin has caused Pekan to suffer both economic damages and physical destructions due to flood. Figure 2 shows the flood map in December 2007 and January 2008, it visualizes the areas affected by the major flood in Pekan such as Kuala Pahang, Ganchong and northwest area of Pekan Town. The northwest area of Pekan Town is the area covered in this study. (Figure 3) The study area is located outside the protected area of the flood bun and flood wall of Pekan Town. The major infrastructures of the study area consist of hospital, mosque, local industry and residential area. Besides, there are three major drainages in the study area namely Genuk River, West Drain and main drain along the road connecting Pekan town to Muadzam Shah. The main road at the study area is important because it connected Pekan Town to Muadzam Shah. Besides, swamp forest is covering the study area. During the flood event in 2007, most of the areas were flooded except Pekan Hospital and Mosque whereas these two places are built in a land-raise area. The main cause of the flood in the study area is due to the overflow of Pahang River and swamp surrounding the area. The residential area and local industry along the Pahang River was affected by flood during the flood event in 2007. Figure 2. Flood Map in December 2007 and January 2008. (Source: DID, 2014) These issues had raised the concern from Department of Irrigation and Drainage Malaysia to come out with several flood mitigation measures in solving the flood issue in Pekan Town such as construction of bund, internal river drainage improvement, control structure and navigation tidal gate. Pekan Flood Mitigation Project was one of the most significant project which implemented by the government with the total protected area of 2,500 ha covering the town area (Department of Irrigation and Drainage, 2014). Flood walls were constructed along Pahang Riverside to protect the overflow of the river whereas flood bunds were constructed surrounding the Pekan town to protect the overflow of swamp water into the town. Meanwhile, internal drain within the protected area is channeled to flow into the South China Sea via the Figure 3. Layout of study area at Pekan Town 3. METHODOLOGY 3.1 Data Collection and Analysis Firstly, ASTER Digital Elevation Model (DEM) was collected from internet sources. In order to generate a contour map from ASTER DEM obtained, the raster data was imported into ArcMap software for the production of contour lines. Existing drainage networks were obtained from topographic map and verified during the site visit. The result is overlaid with site inventory data to produce the study area layout. There were three major drainages in the study area namely Genuk River, West Drain and 2

main drain along the road connecting Pekan town to Muadzam Shah. (Figure 3) Contour map is generated from satellite data, ASTER DEM using ArcMap software. The generated contour map is shown as below. Figure 5: Contour Map of study area Figure 4. Method of generating contour lines from DEM 3.2 Delineation of catchment boundary There are few major principles that required to be follow when generating the catchment boundary (Gribbin, 2013). According to Gribbin, the principles required to follow are listed as below: The average elevation of the study area is in the range of 6m 9m. From the contour map, the extent of study area is defined by using the same principles introduced in the methodology. Most of the area are coveried by swamp forest. Table 1. Total area measurement Catchment Area Study Area 4.2 Catchment Boundary Total area (ha) 1,500 ha Based on the generated contour lines, the catchment boundary is identified by connecting all the divide lines according the principles stated in the methodology. By referring to the layout of current drainage network and contour, it is found that the study area can be divided into two polders (upstream and downstream) with the total area of 1,500 ha. Figure 5. Principles of delineating catchment area When all the divide lines are drawn, the line will be connected to each other for the formation of catchment area. After catchment area is delineated, the area of the catchment is measured and tabulated in hectare in English system. By overlaying the drainage network and the contour lines generated by ASTER DEM, discharge points are defined by taking the catchment boundaries as reference. 4. RESULT AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Contour Map Figure 6. Sub-polders of study area are delineated for upstream polder and downstream polder 4.2.1 Upstream Polder The upstream polder lies on the upstream of Genuk River catchment which are generally flat and swampy. Runoff from the upstream catchment flow into three major drainages mentioned earlier before finally discharged into Pahang River via Genuk River. Upstream polder is approximately 1,205 ha with total four sub-polders identified in the upstream polder. Each area measurement of sub-polders is tabulated as below. It can 3

be noted that about half of the catchment area will discharge to Pahang River via the Genuk River. Table 2. Total area measurement of upstream sub-polders Sub-polders Point of Area (ha) discharge A Drainage along the road 294.3 B Genuk River 220.0 C West Drain 622.4 D Genuk River 114.0 4.2.2 Downstream Polder Total 1,205.7 The downstream polder lies on the downstream of Genuk River. Runoff from this catchment flow into the main drain and Genuk River before discharged into Pahang River. Downstream polder is approximately 300ha with total three sub-polders identified in the downstream polder. Each area measurement of sub-polders is tabulated as below. Table 3. Total area measurement of downstream sub-polders Sub-polders E Point of discharge Drainage along the road Area (ha) 62.2 F Pahang River 125.0 G Genuk River 117.5 5. CONCLUSIONS Total 304.7 Understanding the catchment and discharge points are significant in the planning of flood mitigation measures. ASTER DEM obtained in this study actually help in order to delineate the catchment boundary area and identify the point of discharge of sub-polders. There are two polders (upstream and downstream) identified using the generated contour map. Furthermore, there are total seven sub-polders have been delineated based on the elevation of the study area. Both polders discharge runoff to Pahang River via Genuk River. With the aid of the identified polders, flood mitigation work should able to be planned by considering the limitation of the geographical condition of the areas. Lastly, further work can be done to extract contour from higher resolution data to improve the result. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study would not have been possible without the support of Universiti Malaysia Pahang. The authors would like to thank Department of Irrigation and Drainage, for providing the guidance and information in completing this study. I am grateful to all of those with whom I have had the pleasure to work during this study. Finally, I would like to express my appreciation of the committee of International Young Research Work, for providing me the opportunities to involve in the workshop. REFERENCES Deparment of Irrigation and Drainage. (2014). Flood Map in December 2007 and January 2008. Department of Irrigation and Drainage. (2014). Implementation Value Management for a Flood Mitigation Project - Malaysia Experience. Retrieved October 4, 2017, from http://ppts.icidonline.org/korea_2014/korea_tfve_3.pdf Department of Irrigation and Drainage. (1974). Pahang River Basin Study : Basin Hydrology and River Behavior. (DID Ed.). Kuala Lumpur. Elfithri, R., Abdullah, M. P., Mokhtar, M. B., Toriman, M. E., Embi, A. F., Abdullah, M., Syah, S. H. (2015). Integrated River Basin Management Approach to Support Flood Disaster Strategies for the Pahang River Basin, Malaysia. " Integrated Actions for Global Water and Environmental Sustainability, 42. Ghani, A. A., Chang, C. K., Leow, C. S., & Zakaria, N. A. (2012). Sungai Pahang digital flood mapping: 2007 flood. International Journal of River Basin Management, 10(2), 139 148. Ghani, A. A., Chang, C. K., Puay, H. T., & Ismail, W. R. (2016). Flood inundation analysis for large scale river using hydrodynamic and sediment transport model Case study of Sungai Pahang s December 2014 flood. Ghani, N. A. A., Mohamad, N. A., & Hui, T. W. (2006). Rainfall analysis to determine the potential of rainwater harvesting site in Kuantan, Pahang. Gribbin, J. E. (2013). Introduction to Hydraulics & Hydrology: With Applications for Stormwater Management. Nelson Education. Keizrul Abdullah, P. (2007). Flood Disaster and Its Impacts In Malaysia 2 nd International Course on Flood Mitigation and Stormwater Management 2008. Retrieved from http://www.met.gov.my/web/metmalaysia/publi cations/reports/presentationpaper/2011/disasterm anagementmalaysia2011/presentation/64501/dmc3.pdf Mohit, M. A., & Sellu, G. M. (2013). Mitigation of climate change effects through non-structural flood disaster management in Pekan Town, Malaysia. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 85, 564 573. Needhidasan, S., & Nallanathel, M. (2013). Design of storm water drains by rational method-an approach to storm water management for environmental protection. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(4), 3203 3214. Tan, K. W., & Mokhtar, M. (2009). An appropriate institutional framework towards integrated water 4

resources management in Pahang River basin, Malaysia. European Journal of Scientific Research, 27(4), 536 547. Tekolla, A. (2010). Rainfall and Flood Frequency Analysis in Pahang River Basin, Malaysia. Yasuto Tachikawa, Ross James, Keizrul Abdullah, & Mohd. Nor bin Mohd. Desa. (2004). Catalogue of Rivers for Southeast Asia and the Pacific-Volume V. Retrieved May 3, 2017, from http://hywr.kuciv.kyotou.ac.jp/ihp/rivercatalogue/vol_05/index.html 5