Scripps Institution of Oceanography Seminar University of California San Diego, October 7, 2005

Similar documents
Approximate Methods for Time-Reversal Processing of Large Seismic Reflection Data Sets. University of California, LLNL

The Linear Sampling Method and the MUSIC Algorithm

Imaging and time reversal in random media

Contents. 1 Basic Equations 1. Acknowledgment. 1.1 The Maxwell Equations Constitutive Relations 11

EE/Ge 157 b. Week 2. Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar (2)

Spherical Wave Approach (SWA) for the electromagnetic modelling of 3D GPR scenarios. Nicola Tedeschi

Scattering. March 20, 2016

1 Electromagnetic concepts useful for radar applications

Lecture 8 Notes, Electromagnetic Theory II Dr. Christopher S. Baird, faculty.uml.edu/cbaird University of Massachusetts Lowell

Anthony J. Devaney Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Calculation of Scattering Intensities for the Interaction of Light with a Cluster of Dielectric Objects

Light Scattering Group

Typical anisotropies introduced by geometry (not everything is spherically symmetric) temperature gradients magnetic fields electrical fields

I. Rayleigh Scattering. EE Lecture 4. II. Dipole interpretation

Scattering cross-section (µm 2 )

SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD ANTENNA MEASUREMENTS

On the Modal Superposition Lying under the MoM Matrix Equations

Distributed Sensor Imaging

Classical Scattering

Problem set 3. Electromagnetic waves

EITN90 Radar and Remote Sensing Lecture 5: Target Reflectivity

2D Imaging in Random Media with Active Sensor Array

Network Theory and the Array Overlap Integral Formulation

Electrodynamics II: Lecture 9

Linear Algebra (Review) Volker Tresp 2018

Lecture 10 February 25, 2010

Singular value analysis of Joint Inversion

Handbook of Radiation and Scattering of Waves:

Electrodynamics Qualifier Examination

Rotational motion of a rigid body spinning around a rotational axis ˆn;

E&M. 1 Capacitors. January 2009

3.024 Electrical, Optical, and Magnetic Properties of Materials Spring 2012 Recitation 1. Office Hours: MWF 9am-10am or by appointment

Chapter 2. Linear Algebra. rather simple and learning them will eventually allow us to explain the strange results of

Imaging and time reversal in random media

33AH, WINTER 2018: STUDY GUIDE FOR FINAL EXAM

Chap. 4. Electromagnetic Propagation in Anisotropic Media

J10M.1 - Rod on a Rail (M93M.2)

Fourier Coefficients of Far Fields and the Convex Scattering Support John Sylvester University of Washington

7. introduction to 3D scattering 8. ISAR. 9. antenna theory (a) antenna examples (b) vector and scalar potentials (c) radiation in the far field

Introduction to Matrices

Mie theory for light scattering by a spherical particle in an absorbing medium

CLASSICAL ELECTRICITY

Brewster Angle and Total Internal Reflection

Module I: Electromagnetic waves

THE IMPEDANCE SCATTERING PROBLEM FOR A POINT-SOURCE FIELD. THE SMALL RESISTIVE SPHERE

Non-relativistic scattering

Multi-Static Response Matrix of Spherical Scatterers and the Back-Propagation of Singular Fields

Applied Linear Algebra in Geoscience Using MATLAB

CS6964: Notes On Linear Systems

Brewster Angle and Total Internal Reflection

Physics 506 Winter 2008 Homework Assignment #4 Solutions. Textbook problems: Ch. 9: 9.6, 9.11, 9.16, 9.17

Controlled source interferometry with noisy data Jürg Hunziker, Joost van der Neut, Evert Slob and Kees Wapenaar, Delft University of Technology

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

r r 1 r r 1 2 = q 1 p = qd and it points from the negative charge to the positive charge.

Metamaterials. Peter Hertel. University of Osnabrück, Germany. Lecture presented at APS, Nankai University, China

Module I: Electromagnetic waves

Correlation based imaging

CHAPTER 9 ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES

Scattering Matrices for Nonuniform Multiconductor Transmission Lines

Solutions to exam : 1FA352 Quantum Mechanics 10 hp 1

Topic 2: The mathematical formalism and the standard way of thin

Chapter 1 Introduction

Green s functions for planarly layered media

(a) Show that the amplitudes of the reflected and transmitted waves, corrrect to first order

Sub-wavelength electromagnetic structures

Calculation of Reflection and Transmission Coefficients in scuff-transmission

A far-field based T-matrix method for three dimensional acoustic scattering

Coherent imaging without phases

THE INDIAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL, KUWAIT

Universidad de Cantabria Facultad de Ciencias

Elastic Fields of Dislocations in Anisotropic Media

FORMULA SHEET FOR QUIZ 2 Exam Date: November 8, 2017

Determination of transition matrices for inhomogeneous dielectric bodies by a wave propagator method

linearly indepedent eigenvectors as the multiplicity of the root, but in general there may be no more than one. For further discussion, assume matrice

Scattering. 1 Classical scattering of a charged particle (Rutherford Scattering)

Evaluation of the Sacttering Matrix of Flat Dipoles Embedded in Multilayer Structures

Electromagnetic Waves Across Interfaces

Light Localization in Left-Handed Media

Chap. 1 Fundamental Concepts

Lecture 6: Modeling of MIMO Channels Theoretical Foundations of Wireless Communications 1

EUF. Joint Entrance Examination for Postgraduate Courses in Physics

INVERSION ASSUMING WEAK SCATTERING

Experimental validation of a transport-based imaging method in highly scattering environments

Lecture 21 Reminder/Introduction to Wave Optics

Lecture 6: Modeling of MIMO Channels Theoretical Foundations of Wireless Communications 1. Overview. CommTh/EES/KTH

Scattering of light from quasi-homogeneous sources by quasi-homogeneous media

Polarization Optics. N. Fressengeas

Chapter 11. Radiation. How accelerating charges and changing currents produce electromagnetic waves, how they radiate.

Spectral approach to scattering from spheres (scalar waves)

On Electromagnetic-Acoustic Analogies in Energetic Relations for Waves Interacting with Material Surfaces

The Imaging of Anisotropic Media in Inverse Electromagnetic Scattering

Electrodynamics I Final Exam - Part A - Closed Book KSU 2005/12/12 Electro Dynamic

Atkins & de Paula: Atkins Physical Chemistry 9e Checklist of key ideas. Chapter 7: Quantum Theory: Introduction and Principles

Interferometric array imaging in clutter

Preliminary Exam: Electromagnetism, Thursday January 12, :00-12:00

MP204 Electricity and Magnetism

Chap 3. Linear Algebra

Linear Algebra Review (Course Notes for Math 308H - Spring 2016)

Engineering Electromagnetics

Maths for Signals and Systems Linear Algebra in Engineering

Transcription:

Scripps Institution of Oceanography Seminar University of California San Diego, October 7, 2005 TIME REVERSAL FOR RADAR IMAGING OF SMALL CONDUCTING AND/OR DIELECTRIC OBJECTS HIDDEN BY CLUTTER James G. Berryman University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Collaborator on this work: David H. Chambers, LLNL

OUTLINE OF TALK Motivation Electromagnetic imaging/detection through foliage/clutter Characterization: If we do see something, what is it? History: Acoustic and Elastic T/R Chambers and Gautesen (JASA, 2001) Summary of the Electromagnetic Analysis for a Small Dielectric or Conducting Sphere Numerical Examples Conclusions

TIME-REVERSAL ACOUSTICS PROBLEMS Liliana Borcea, Chrysoula Tsogka, and George Papanicolaou (Stanford - Math): acoustic imaging through random media using statistical stability concepts John Sylvester (UW - Math): more precise acoustic imaging using angular dependence of the far-field scattering operator Chris Jones, Darrell Jackson, and Dan Rouseff (APL - UWash): super-resolution or super-focusing (for communications) in waveguides (like the ocean) and also random media (like the turbulent ocean)

Source Array Setup Consider an array of N short, crossed-dipole elements lying in the plane z = z a, where z a is the distance between the plane and the scattering sphere (which is located at the origin). The position of the nth element of the array is given by r n = (x n, y n, z a ). The standard result for the electric field at point r radiated from the nth element is given by E (i) n = ikeikr n 4πɛ 0 cr n ˆRn [ ˆR n (d H I H n ê x + d V I V n ê y )], where c is the speed of light, k is the wavenumber, ɛ 0 is the electrical permittivity, and R n = r r n. The scalar R n = R n is the vector s magnitude.

Source Array Setup (continued) The horizontal and vertical dipoles in the element (having lengths d H and d V ) are driven by the currents In H and In V, respectively). The horizontal dipole is oriented parallel to the x-axis and the vertical dipole parallel to the y-axis. There is also a magnetic field radiated from the nth element, which is given similarly by H (i) n = ikeikr n 4πɛ 0 cr n [ ˆR n (d H I H n ê x + d V I V n ê y )].

Scattered Field With a sphere of radius a << z a at the origin and a also much smaller than the wavelength, the scattered field to leading order is given by E (s) = k2 e ikr r [ˆr ( m + ˆr p)]. The induced electric dipole moment is p and the induced magnetic dipole moment is m. These moments are generated at the sphere as if a plane wave were incident at this distance.

Scattered Field (continued) The moments are related to the incident field evaluated at the position of the sphere r = 0: m = m 0ˆr n E (i) n ( r n ), p = p 0 E (i) n ( r n ). The scalar factors are p 0 = a 3 (ñ 2 1)/(ñ 2 + 2), where ñ 2 = ɛ + i4πσ/ω, and m 0 = ib m 1 /k 3. The sphere relative permittivity is ɛ, its conductivity is σ, the angular frequency is ω, and B m 1 determines the strength of the magnetic moment. numbers. In general, m 0 and p 0 are complex

Induced Fields at the Array The scattered field induces voltages on each dipole element of the array. The result at the mth element can be expressed as V H m = d H [ˆr m (ˆr m ê x )] E (s) ( r m ), V V m = d V [ˆr m (ˆr m ê y )] E (s) ( r m ). Combining all these expressions (incident field, scattered field, and induced voltages) will produce the full transfer matrix for this problem.

The Scattering Matrix Since all three of these steps involve double cross-product formulas, the resulting final expressions will be rather tedious unless we can find some way to simplify them. We found that, by introducing a special type of projection operator (a 3 3 matrix) defined by mn = ˆr m ˆr n I ˆr nˆr m, T we could collapse the equations very efficiently, where I is the identity matrix. In these terms, the main scattering operator can be written as S = mm (m 0 mn p 0 mm ) nn.

The Scattering Matrix (continued) Then using the properties of our projection operator, we find easily that S = m 0 mn p 0 mm nn. The result is that we can write the key matrix as ( K HH mn K V H mn Kmn HV Kmn V V ) = ik3 e ik(r m+rn) 4πɛ 0 cr m r n ( dh ê T x d V ê T y ) S ( d H ê x d V ê y ). The superscripts H and V refer to the horizontal and vertical dipoles in each array element and their corresponding polarizations.

The Scattering Matrix (concluded) Then the final result is ( V H m V V m ) = ( K HH mn K V H mn Kmn HV Kmn V V )( I H n I V n ).

The Coupling Matrix The 2 2 matrix K mn can be written as K mn = ik3 qe ik(r m+rn) 4πɛ 0 cr m r n ˆKmn, where the elements of ˆK mn were given before, and q m 0 2 + p 0 2. Note that ˆK mn = ˆK mn T by reciprocity. Note also that all combinations of polarization coupling are represented in K mn.

Data and SVD Our array has N crossed-dipole elements lying in a plane. Let V be the vector of received voltages and I the vector of transmitted currents (both of length 2N). Then, where V = TI, V = (V H 1, V V 1,...,V H N, V V N )T I = (I H 1, I V 1,...,I H N, IV N )T, and T is the transfer matrix.

Transfer Matrix The response or transfer matrix for this problem is K 11 K 12 K 1N K T = 21 K 22 K 2N......... K N1 K N2 K NN The matrices K mn are 2 2 matrices connecting horizontal and vertical dipole sources to horizontal and vertical dipole receivers in all four possible combinations: K mn = ( K HH mn K V H mn Kmn HV Kmn V V ).

Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) We could compose the full time-reversal operator for this problem, which is T T. This matrix is square and Hermitian. Eigenvectors and eigenvalues can be found in a straightforward way. But this is actually somewhat more difficult (unwieldy) than performing the singular value decomposition on the matrix T itself. In this case, TΦ = ΛΦ, where the singular values Λ are real, non-negative, and also the square roots of the eigenvalues for the corresponding eigenvectors of T T.

Normalizing the Equations We can simplify the problem somewhat more by normalizing the equations, and eliminating various common factors. Letting z j = e ikr j, for j = 1,...,N, we define φ 1,..., φ 2N by and Φ = 1 i ( φ 1 z 1, φ 2, z 1,...,φ 2N 1 z N, φ 2N z N ) T, Then, the SVD reduces to Λ = k3 q 4πɛ 0 c λ. ˆTφ = λφ,

Normalizing the Equations (continued) where now ˆT = ˆK 11 ˆK 12 ˆK 1N ˆK 21 ˆK22 ˆK2N......... ˆK N1 ˆKN2 ˆKNN By factoring out the complex exponential from the original singular vectors Φ, the part of the phase responsible for focusing the transmitted field on the sphere is eliminated.

Normalizing the Equations (concluded) This result is common to all eigenvectors of the TRO in the presence of a single scatterer. The remaining vector φ represents the (signed) amplitude distribution over the array, which may have a pattern of nulls depending on the nature of the scattering from the sphere.

Deconstructing the Transfer Matrix The transfer matrix can now be easily (!) deconstructed into its two main components, ˆT = ˆT p + ˆT m. These are terms for the dielectric and conducting contributions to the scattering: ˆT p = e iθ p (g 1 g1 T + g 2 g2 T + g 3 g3 T ) ˆT m = e iθ m (g 4 g4 T + g 5 g5 T + g 6 g6 T ). The vectors g j, for j = 1,...,6 are known explicitly from the analysis. The singular vectors for a matrix of this form can be expressed as linear combinations of the same vectors: φ = 6 j=1 γ jg j.

The Reduced SVD These results reduce the SVD for the 2N 2N matrix ˆT to an SVD instead of a 6 6 matrix G. This reduction is obviously substantial if N is much greater than 3. The matrix elements of G are given by G jl = g T j g l and the SVD takes the form: e iθ p 6 l=1 G jlγ l = λγ j e iθ m 6 l=1 G jlγ l = λγ j for j = 1, 2, 3 for j = 4, 5, 6. This reduction follows from the fact that there are only a small number of terms used in the partial wave expansion for the scattered field.

The Reduced SVD (continued) In particular, the field is generated by an electric dipole moment and a magnetic dipole moment, each of which can be oriented in three mutually orthogonal directions. Thus, for small ka, there are at most six eigenvectors associated with any small scattering object such as a conducting sphere.

CONCLUSIONS Six significant modes can be associated with a small spherical scatterer: three for the dielectric interaction are always present, and another three for the conductive interaction if the scatterer is highly conductive/metallic. Characterization using detected presence or absence of metallic/conductive properties should be relatively straightforward with this approach. The two modes corresponding to endfire dipoles can normally only be seen in the relatively near field.