Answer - SAQ 1. The intensity, I, is given by: Back

Similar documents
Sound radiation and transmission. Professor Phil Joseph. Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica

Engineering Noise Control

Users Manual. Marshall Day Acoustics. Double Panels Contact 33 Details Marshall Day 37.8 Acoustics PO Box

Noise in enclosed spaces. Phil Joseph

ACOUSTICS 1.01 Pantone 144 U & Pantone 5405 U

unit 4 acoustics & ultrasonics

EFFECTS OF PERMEABILITY ON SOUND ABSORPTION AND SOUND INSULATION PERFORMANCE OF ACOUSTIC CEILING PANELS

PROPAGATION, NOISE CRITERIA

Fundamentals of silencing and their practical application in screw compressor plants

Lesson 13. Basic Concepts in Architectural Acoustics INTRODUCTION

Sound-Absorbing and Insulating Enclosures for Ultrasonic Range

Lesson Propagation of sound Sound fields Spherical, cylindrical and perpendicular wave fronts.

Development of a small-scale reverberation room

Sound radiation and sound insulation

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Acoustics Acoustic insulation for pipes, valves and flanges

Acoustic design of lightweight cabin walls for cruise ships

INTER-NOISE AUGUST 2007 ISTANBUL, TURKEY

LIST OF PUBLISHED STANDARDS

Analytical and experimental study of single frame double wall

Design of Partial Enclosures. D. W. Herrin, Ph.D., P.E. University of Kentucky Department of Mechanical Engineering

The diagram below. to the by the. outlet into. calculation. Since TRANSMISSION VIA STRUCTURE. Vibration Via Supports Duct Breakout

Dynamic Analysis on Vibration Isolation of Hypersonic Vehicle Internal Systems

Research of Different Noise Barriers Efficiency at Different Temperature

THE DEPENDENCE OF SOUND ABSORPTION BY AN ISOLATED ACOUSTIC RESONATOR ON THE RESONATOR S VOLUME

9. TRANSMISSION OF SOUND THROUGH STRUCTURES

ISO 354 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Acoustics Measurement of sound absorption in a reverberation room

Contents. Lehman College Department of Physics and Astronomy. Lab manual for PHY 141 Sound, speech and music 1 PENDULUM EXPERIMENT 3

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

Experimental approach on natural frequency of window vibration induced by low frequency sounds

Ecophon Acoustic Calculator. Accurate values in advance

Exposure Controls for physical Agents

Laboratory for Acoustics. Determination of the sound insulation of sliding door constructions, manufactured by Metaflex

Method of estimating the reverberant sound absorption coefficient of the absorbing structure composed of different plane porous materials

University of Kentucky

FDTD analysis on the sound insulation performance of wall system with narrow gaps

EFFECT OF MEMBRANE SURFACE TENSION AND BACKED-AIR GAP DISTANCE ON SOUND ABSORPTION CHARACTERISTICS

MEASUREMENTS OF SOUND ABSORPTION TIMBERCRETE

Numerical Model of the Insertion Loss Promoted by the Enclosure of a Sound Source

FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON SOUND AND VIBRATION DECEMBER 15-18, 1997 ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA

LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF THE SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENTS OF OSCAR EVO-PANELS

THE ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMNET SYSTEM USING TWO MICROPHONES

Research Article A Mathematical Images Group Model to Estimate the Sound Level in a Close-Fitting Enclosure

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 78 (2015 ) th International Building Physics Conference, IBPC 2015

EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION OF THE EUROPEAN METHODOLOGY FOR TESTING NOISE BARRIERS IN SITU: SOUND REFLECTION

Test Report. RI Acoustic Lab. Measurement of Sound Absorption Coefficient for RockDelta NoiStop Noise Barrier. 20 Feb. 07

APPENDIX B. Noise Primer

Reciprocity as an Analysing Technique in Building Acoustics

Laser scanning vibrometry measurements on a light weight building element

Number Title Year Organization Page

Acoustics Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors Part 2: General method of calculation

D. BARD DIVISION OF ENGINEERING ACOUSTICS, LUND UNIVERSITY

Noise impact of innovative barriers dedicated to freight trains in urban areas

Evaluation of standards for transmission loss tests

Fundamentals of noise and Vibration analysis for engineers

A simple formula for insertion loss prediction of large acoustical enclosures using statistical energy analysis method

ACOUSTIC INTRINSIC PERFORMANCES OF NOISE BARRIERS: ACCURACY OF IN SITU MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES

Measurement of Acoustic Properties of light weight concrete SL-Deck

Summary. The basic principles of the simulation technique SERT

Thermodynamics continued

ROOM RESONANCES USING WAVE BASED GEOMET- RICAL ACOUSTICS (WBGA)

Sound transmission loss of windows on high speed trains

19 th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2007

COULD THE GUNSHOT BE HEARD?

Turbines and turbine sets Measurement of emitted airborne noise Engineering/survey method

1238. Relation between reduction of weighted impact sound pressure level and shape of small size specimen of floating floor construction

GROUND VIBRATION PREDICTION AND ASSESSMENT

New techniques in computer aided noise abatement for workplaces next to machinery Wolfgang Probst

SOUND ABSORPTION OF SLAT STRUCTURES FOR PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Influence of loudspeaker directivity on the measurement uncertainty of the acoustic testing of facades.

An integrated approach to Acoustics - sound propagation and the phenomena affecting it

Modeling and simulation of windows with noise mitigation and natural ventilation

DETERMINATION OF AIRBORNE SOUND POWER LEVELS EMITTED BY GEAR UNITS

Amplified catalogue of vibration reduction index formulas for junctions based on numerical simulations

SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT - Vol. I Acoustics in the Built Environment - Richard Guy

Air distribution systems. Linear whirl outlet WL...

1.50 m, and a speed of 750 km/hr. What is the distance between adjacent crests of these waves? A) 9000 m B) 32,400 m C) 2500 m D) 9000 km E) 32,400 km

1817. Research of sound absorption characteristics for the periodically porous structure and its application in automobile

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment. 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

CONSOLIDATED GRANULAR MEDIA FOR SOUND INSULATION: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION THROUGH DIFFERENT METHODS

Acoustic spaces: comfort and social sustainability

REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENTS OF WOVEN IMAGE ECHO PANEL 7MM TESTED WITH A 20MM AIR GAP IN A REVERBERATION ROOM.

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

SOUND TRANSMISSION LOSS MEASUREMENTS - AN AUTOMOTIVE OVERVIEW

The frequency and angular dependence of the absorption coefficient of common types of living plants

Noise mitigation measures to be used for the explosive cladding in open air

DELTA Test Report. DANAK TEST Reg. no Measurement of Sound Absorption Coefficient for Kvadrat Soft Cells Wall Panel Type Time

Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01

REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENTS OF WOVEN IMAGE ECHO PANEL 24MM TESTED WITH NO AIR GAP MEASURED IN A REVERBERATION ROOM.

Report. Laboratory for Acoustics

CIRCO. Sound-attenuating transfer unit QUICK FACTS

PROPAGATION PHASE REPRESENTATION IN 3D SPACE USING POLES AND ZEROS IN COMPLEX FREQUENCY PLANE. ( address of lead author)

Assessment & Specifications for Noise Controls

Active Impact Sound Isolation with Floating Floors. Gonçalo Fernandes Lopes

DEA 350: HUMAN FACTORS: THE AMBIENT ENVIRONMENT (Spring 2008)

Notes on Absorption and Impedance Measurements

Sound. p V V, where p is the change in pressure, V/V is the percent change in volume. The bulk modulus is a measure 1

Benefits of Reduced-size Reverberation Room Testing

Sound reflection from different noise barriers

Transcription:

Answer - SAQ 1 The intensity, I, is given by: Noise Control. Edited by Shahram Taherzadeh. 2014 The Open University. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 142

Answer - SAQ 2 It shows that the human ear is less sensitive at lower frequencies than at higher frequencies. This effect is more significant at low (or quiet) sound levels than at high levels. 143

Answer - SAQ 3 Total absorption = absorption of floor + absorption of ceiling + absorption of walls Since the floor is hard, its absorption coefficient is assumed to be 0. Hence: Total absorption = (5 6 0) + (5 6 0.1) + 2(4 6 + 4 5) 0.4 = 0 + 3.0 + 35.2 = 38.2 m 2 144

Answer - SAQ 4 From Equation 15, the room constant R c is given by: Substituting this value into Equation 16, the sound pressure level at 2 m or greater from the machine is: 87 + 6 10 log(40) = 77 db(a) (to 2 significant figures) 145

Answer - SAQ 5 Correct: c. The room constant depends on the amount of sound absorption within a room. f. The room constant is expressed in units of area. Wrong: a. The sound pressure level due to a given source at a given distance in a room is less than that from the same source at the same distance outdoors. False: the presence of the room boundaries adds a reverberant contribution to the direct sound at any given reception point. b. The sound pressure level near to any source obeys an inversesquare law with distance. False: near to a source, the finite size of the source will have some effect and the source location will also have an influence. d. The larger the room constant, the greater the sound level at distances of 10 m or more from the source. False: the room constant is a measure of the total absorption in a room. As this increases, the reverberation will decrease and consequently so will the contribution from reverberation to the total sound at a given distance. e. The room constant depends on the position of a sound source within a room. False: the room constant depends only on the surface absorption in a room. Statements (c) and (f) are true. 146

Statement (a) is false: the presence of the room boundaries adds a reverberant contribution to the direct sound at any given reception point. Statement (b) is false: near to a source, the finite size of the source will have some effect and the source location will also have an influence. Statement (d) is false: the room constant is a measure of the total absorption in a room. As this increases, the reverberation will decrease and consequently so will the contribution from reverberation to the total sound at a given distance. Statement (e) is false: the room constant depends only on the surface absorption in a room. 147

Answer - SAQ 6 Correct: 88 db(a) Wrong: 100 db(a) 73 db(a) 64 db(a) None of the above A-weighted sound power = 10 2 W, so using Equation 9: From Figure 16, for a very live room, surface area S = 6800 m 2 : = 0.01. Using Equation 15 and total Alternatively, using the graph in Figure 16, for a very live room of total surface area 6800 m 2 : R c 70 m 2 So, at 20 m, using Equation 16: 148

Using a more precise value for the room constant would result in more or less the same answer - SAQ 6 - SAQ 6. Since these equations are approximations only, there is no point in using very precise numbers. However, it is good practice to check this. 149

Answer - Exercise 1 Using Equation 19, we have: So the level is 89 db to the nearest whole db. Note that T is not the sum of the exposure times but the time period for the average (the 8-hour working day in this case), and this period and the individual exposure times must be in the same time units. 150

Answer - Exercise 2 L Aeq,24h is first calculated for each type of train separately and then these individual values are combined. The total duration for each type of event is obtained by multiplying the single event duration by the number of events. Note that the 24-hour period has to be converted to seconds since the individual event durations are given in seconds. The total duration corresponding to noise from the fast trains is 12 seconds per train 120 trains, so using Equation 19: Similarly, for the slow trains: and, for the freight trains: The total L Aeq,24h is obtained by combining these three levels: L Aeq,24h = 10 log(10 6.72 + 10 6.42 + 10 5.95 ) = 69.4 db(a) So the combined equivalent continuous level is 69 db(a) to the nearest db. It is also possible to combine these stages in one go: 151

152

Answer - SAQ 7 Since the ground is flat, the mean height, h m, is given by the mean of the source and receiver heights: h m = (2.0 +1.5)/2 = 1.75 Equation 25 therefore gives: Thus the attenuation due to ground effect is 4 db to the nearest whole db. 153

Answer - SAQ 8 Correct: d. For a given power input, processes involving squeezing and bending are less noisy than processes involving impact and shock. Wrong: a. Noise control by design of plant depends only on improving the mechanical efficiency. False: the choice of process is also important. b. In a situation where there are five noise sources, each producing a different noise level at the measuring position, but where one source produces a noise level that is 10 db(a) more than any of the others, the overall noise level may be 3 db(a) higher than the highest of the individual levels. False: the resultant overall noise level will be insignificantly greater than the highest. c. Noise control of rotating machinery requires only that the speed of rotation be reduced. False: altering speed affects frequency spectrum but not necessarily overall level, and at some speeds may result in an increase in sound level. Statement (d) is true. Statement (a) is false: the choice of process is also important. Statement (b) is false: the resultant overall noise level will be insignificantly greater than the highest. Statement (c) is false: altering speed affects frequency spectrum but not necessarily overall level, and at some speeds may result in an increase in sound level. 154

Answer - SAQ 9 Correct: b. It depends on the size of the enclosure, the amount of absorption within it, and the transmission loss of the walls and roof. d. It is improved by vibration isolation of the enclosed machine. Wrong: a. It is equal to the difference between the sound levels inside and outside the enclosure. False: noise reduction is defined as the difference in levels before and after the enclosure is built. c. It is improved by the presence of openings. False: openings tend to reduce sound transmission loss. e. It is unlikely to exceed 5 db(a). False: enclosures can produce reductions in the order of 30 db(a). Statements (b) and (d) are true. Statement (a) is false: noise reduction is defined as the difference in levels before and after the enclosure is built. Statement (c) is false: openings tend to reduce sound transmission loss. Statement (e) is false: enclosures can produce reductions in the order of 30 db(a). 155

Answer - SAQ 10 First calculate the total surface area of the enclosure: S = 4 (5 3) + (5 5) = 85 m 2 (Note that this total does not include the floor area, since this is occupied by the enclosed machine.) Also: A = 4 (5 3) 0.9 = 54 m 2 So, by Equation 37: This would be a reasonable target for reduction at 1000 Hz. 156

Answer - SAQ 11 Correct: b. Propagation of sound from one room in a building to another via a corridor is an example of airborne flanking transmission. d. Vibrations in a dwelling due to passing vehicles on a road nearby may be due to indirect, airborne and structure-borne sound paths. e. Closing a window in a room could have an effect on the noise level in that room due to a source in an adjacent room. Wrong: a. Structure-borne sound results only from contact between a structure and a vibrating object. False: airborne sound can induce structural vibration. c. A noise problem on the third floor of a five-storey building due to an air-conditioning plant mounted on the roof is a consequence of a direct airborne sound path. False: structure-borne sound is more likely to be involved. Statements (b), (d) and (e) are true. Statement (a) is false: airborne sound can induce structural vibration. Statement (c) is false: structure-borne sound is more likely to be involved. 157

Answer - SAQ 12 Direct airborne through the open toilet door into the hall, landing, etc. Flanking airborne under or through gaps in the door, out through the window and back in again through an adjacent one. Flanking structure-borne directly from the toilet to the floor or wall and to the room(s) below or to the side, and from water pipes or drain pipes in direct contact with the toilet and the structure. 158

Answer - SAQ 13 Wall area = 4 15 m 5 m = 300 m 2 Floor area = ceiling area = 15 m 15 m = 225 m 2 Since the absorption of the different areas before treatment is small, we can use Equation 38: so R c1 = A 1 = 41.25 m 2 After treatment, however, the mean absorption coefficient is not small enough for us to use Equation 38, so we use Equation 15 (Section 2.6) for calculating the room constant: so by Equation 15 Thus: 159

or 13 db to the nearest db. 160

Answer - SAQ 14 Correct: b. An air gap behind a porous layer has the same effect on its absorption as increasing its thickness. d. Panel absorbers can be tuned to particular frequencies. Wrong: a. The low-frequency absorption of a porous material is greater than that at high frequencies. False: porous materials absorb better at high frequencies. c. Making road surfaces porous has no effect on traffic noise. False: porous road surfaces reduce traffic noise by reducing generation of road-tyre noise, as well as absorbing generated noise. e. Adding a porous absorbing layer behind a panel absorber increases its effectiveness at the tuned frequency. False: an absorbing layer makes it effective at most frequencies. An air gap reduces noise at the tuned frequency. Statement (b) is true (see Figure 40). Statement (d) is also true. Statement (a) is false: porous materials absorb better at high frequencies. Statement (c) is false: porous road surfaces reduce traffic noise by reducing generation of road-tyre noise, as well as absorbing generated noise. Statement (e) is false: an absorbing layer makes it effective at most frequencies. An air gap reduces noise at the tuned frequency. 161

Answer - SAQ 15 So the value is 5 db to the nearest whole db. Note that I have assumed the mean absorption coefficient is small enough for us to use the approximate formula to calculate A 2. In this case the mean value is 0.283, which is a borderline case. 162

Answer - SAQ 16 Correct: a. The attenuation offered by a noise barrier is limited by diffraction. d. Noise barriers are most effective if they are close either to the source or to the receiver. Wrong: b. The effectiveness of noise barriers continues to increase as their density is increased. False: diffraction is the limiting factor. c. Barriers are only effective if they are made entirely from soundabsorbing materials. False: barriers are effective even if made from a (dense) reflecting material. However, they can be more effective if made from a soundabsorbing material, as long as it is dense enough. e. Lightweight acoustic barriers can be very effective. False: effective barriers must have a surface density of at least 10 kg m 2. Statement (a) is true. Statement (d) is also true (because the path difference is then greater). Statement (b) is false: diffraction is the limiting factor. Statement (c) is false: barriers are effective even if made from a (dense) reflecting material. However, they can be more effective if made from a sound-absorbing material, as long as it is dense enough. Statement (e) is false: effective barriers must have a surface density of at least 10 kg m 2. 163

Answer - SAQ 17 Indoors there are more likely to be reflecting surfaces to provide sound paths round the barrier other than those corresponding to diffraction and direct transmission. 164

Answer - SAQ 18 In Figure 49, find the curve that meets the left-hand vertical axis at 40 db. This is the difference (50 10) between the insulation in db of the two surfaces. Follow the vertical line up from 4 on the horizontal axis (which is the ratio of high to low insulation in this case) until you intersect the curve. The net loss of insulation is the reading on the right-hand vertical axis at this point, i.e. 32.5 db. This means that the composite wall (including window) can be expected to offer at most (50 32.5) db = 17.5 db insulation at 1 khz. 165

Answer - SAQ 19 Cavity brick walls don t offer a full sound reduction because of weak links, such as windows, doors and air bricks. 166

Answer - SAQ 20 Correct: a. In the frequency range through which the mass law holds, either doubling the superficial weight of a wall or doubling the frequency produces an increase in transmission loss of between 5 and 6 db. Wrong: b. The increase in insulation resulting from a cavity wall construction compared with that of one of the single wall components is explained by the mass law. False: the increase is also as a result of cavity resonance (the air acting as an isolating spring). c. Deviations from the mass law behaviour of a single wall are caused only by flanking transmission. False: wall vibrations (bending waves) and stiffness have an effect. d. An air gap accounting for 5% of the area of a wall that otherwise offers 50 db(a) sound reduction at 2 khz will reduce the sound reduction at 2 khz to 25 db(a). False: according to Figure 49, a 5% (1/20 area) gap of 0 db insulation will reduce the wall insulation by nearly 37.5 db, i.e. to around 12.5 db(a). Statement (a) is true. Statement (b) is false: the increase is also as a result of cavity resonance (the air acting as an isolating spring). Statement (c) is false: wall vibrations (bending waves) and stiffness have an effect. Statement (d) is false: according to Figure 49, a 5% (1/20 area) gap of 0 db insulation will reduce the wall insulation by nearly 37.5 db, i.e. to around 12.5 db(a). 167

Answer - SAQ 21 Earmuffs will be more effective at 1000 Hz than at 100 Hz. From Figure 54 (b), good earmuffs will have attenuations of about 18 db at 100 Hz and 40 db at 1000 Hz. The relevant attenuations for earplugs are, from Figure 52(b), 15 db at 100 Hz and 25 db at 1000 Hz. 168

Answer - SAQ 22 Earmuffs will be unsuitable in hot conditions or where the noise is predominantly low frequency. 169