Multiplicative Jordan Decomposition in Integral Group Rings

Similar documents
MULTIPLICATIVE JORDAN DECOMPOSITION IN GROUP RINGS OF 3-GROUPS

Algebraic Structures Exam File Fall 2013 Exam #1

Exercises on chapter 1

D. S. Passman. University of Wisconsin-Madison

Sylow structure of finite groups

Kevin James. p-groups, Nilpotent groups and Solvable groups

Transitivity of properties of two-generator subgroups of finite groups

Algebra SEP Solutions

1. Group Theory Permutations.

Groups of units of integral group rings of Kleinian type

QUALIFYING EXAM IN ALGEBRA August 2011

A SURVEY ON FREE SUBGROUPS IN THE GROUP OF UNITS OF GROUP RINGS

A structure theorem for the unit group of the integral group ring of some finite groups

INVARIANT IDEALS OF ABELIAN GROUP ALGEBRAS UNDER THE MULTIPLICATIVE ACTION OF A FIELD, II

ANALYSIS OF SMALL GROUPS

How many units can a commutative ring have?

ALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL

Group rings of finite strongly monomial groups: central units and primitive idempotents

Finite groups determined by an inequality of the orders of their elements

On Finite Groups in which Every Solvable Non-cyclic Proper Subgroup is either Self-normalizing or Normal 1

Algebra Questions. May 13, Groups 1. 2 Classification of Finite Groups 4. 3 Fields and Galois Theory 5. 4 Normal Forms 9

PROBLEMS FROM GROUP THEORY

Character Theory and Group Rings

GENERALIZED QUATERNIONS

Math 250: Higher Algebra Representations of finite groups

CHAPTER III NORMAL SERIES

A. (Groups of order 8.) (a) Which of the five groups G (as specified in the question) have the following property: G has a normal subgroup N such that

Exercises on chapter 4

GRE Subject test preparation Spring 2016 Topic: Abstract Algebra, Linear Algebra, Number Theory.

Units in Group Rings


School of Mathematics and Statistics. MT5824 Topics in Groups. Problem Sheet I: Revision and Re-Activation

Units of Integral Group Rings, Banff, Eric Jespers. Vrije Universiteit Brussel Belgium

Page Points Possible Points. Total 200

The Ring of Monomial Representations

Using semidirect product of (semi)groups in public key cryptography

Algebra Exam, Spring 2017

Chapter 1. Wedderburn-Artin Theory

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS

CENTRALIZERS OF INVOLUTIONS IN FINITE SIMPLE GROUPS

Algebra Qualifying Exam, Fall 2018

SPHERICAL SPACE FORMS REVISITED

φ(xy) = (xy) n = x n y n = φ(x)φ(y)

On metacyclic extensions

Sylow 2-Subgroups of Solvable Q-Groups

HOMEWORK Graduate Abstract Algebra I May 2, 2004

Ph.D. Qualifying Examination in Algebra Department of Mathematics University of Louisville January 2018

Representation Theory

MA441: Algebraic Structures I. Lecture 26

D. S. Passman University of Wisconsin-Madison

The primitive root theorem

Finitary Permutation Groups

MATH 3030, Abstract Algebra FALL 2012 Toby Kenney Midyear Examination Friday 7th December: 7:00-10:00 PM

TRANSITIVE PERMUTATION GROUPS IN WHICH ALL DERANGEMENTS ARE INVOLUTIONS

NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS

120A LECTURE OUTLINES

Name: Solutions Final Exam

1 Fields and vector spaces

Algebraic Structures II

Abstract Algebra: Supplementary Lecture Notes

On a subalgebra of the centre of a group ring

Group Algebras with the Bounded Splitting Property. Derek J.S. Robinson. Ischia Group Theory 2014

DOES XY 2 = Z 2 IMPLY X IS A SQUARE?

0 Sets and Induction. Sets

GROUP ALGEBRAS 1. Inder Bir S. Passi. Dedicated to the memory of Indar Singh Luthar

COMMUTATIVITY DEGREE OF FINITE GROUPS. Anna Castelaz

Algebra Exam Syllabus

Groups. 3.1 Definition of a Group. Introduction. Definition 3.1 Group

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM SPRING 2012

Note that a unit is unique: 1 = 11 = 1. Examples: Nonnegative integers under addition; all integers under multiplication.

Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010

Periodic Cyclic Cohomology of Group Rings

Selected exercises from Abstract Algebra by Dummit and Foote (3rd edition).

FINITE GROUPS IN WHICH SOME PROPERTY OF TWO-GENERATOR SUBGROUPS IS TRANSITIVE

AN AXIOMATIC FORMATION THAT IS NOT A VARIETY

List of topics for the preliminary exam in algebra

Supplement. Dr. Bob s Modern Algebra Glossary Based on Fraleigh s A First Course on Abstract Algebra, 7th Edition, Sections 0 through IV.

Unit Group of Z 2 D 10

Definitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations

TEST CODE: PMB SYLLABUS

ALGEBRA 11: Galois theory

Maximal finite subgroups of Sp(2n, Q)

Poincaré Bisectors and Application to Units

D-MATH Algebra II FS18 Prof. Marc Burger. Solution 26. Cyclotomic extensions.

Left Metacyclic Ideals

The Class Equation X = Gx. x X/G

Nonsolvable Groups with No Prime Dividing Three Character Degrees

Converse to Lagrange s Theorem Groups

Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille

On the centralizer and the commutator subgroup of an automorphism

FINITELY GENERATED SIMPLE ALGEBRAS: A QUESTION OF B. I. PLOTKIN

Algebra. Travis Dirle. December 4, 2016

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER

Groups with Few Normalizer Subgroups

COURSE SUMMARY FOR MATH 504, FALL QUARTER : MODERN ALGEBRA

GROUPS POSSESSING A SMALL NUMBER OF SETS OF CONJUGATE OPERATORS*

UNITARY UNITS IN GROUP ALGEBRAS. J. Z. Gonçalves D. S. Passman. University of São Paulo University of Wisconsin-Madison

SOLVABLE FUSION CATEGORIES AND A CATEGORICAL BURNSIDE S THEOREM

CONSEQUENCES OF THE SYLOW THEOREMS

Groups whose elements are not conjugate to their powers

Transcription:

Multiplicative Jordan Decomposition in Integral Group Rings D. S. Passman University of Wisconsin Madison Brussels Conference June 2017 D. S. Passman (U. W. Madison) Jordan Decomposition Brussels Conference 1 / 15

Jordan Decomposition Let Q[G] be the rational group algebra of the finite group G. Since Q is a perfect field, every element x of Q[G] has a unique additive Jordan decomposition x = x s + x n, where x s is semisimple and where x n commutes with x s and is nilpotent. If x is a unit, then x s is also invertible and x = x s (1 + x 1 s x n ) is a product of a semisimple unit x s and a commuting unipotent unit x u = 1 + x 1 s x n. This is the unique multiplicative Jordan decomposition of x. D. S. Passman (U. W. Madison) Jordan Decomposition Brussels Conference 2 / 15

The Additive Property Following Hales and Passi, we say that Z[G] (or G) has the additive Jordan decomposition property (AJD) if for every element x of Z[G], its semisimple and unipotent parts are both contained in Z[G]. (HP) AJD holds in Z[G] if and only if G is either 1 abelian, or 2 of the form G = Q 8 E A, namely G is a Dedekind group, where Q 8 is the quaternion group of order 8, E is an elementary abelian 2-group, A is abelian of odd order, and the multiplicative order of 2 modulo A is odd, or 3 G = D 2p is dihedral, where p is an odd prime. D. S. Passman (U. W. Madison) Jordan Decomposition Brussels Conference 3 / 15

The Multiplicative Property We say that Z[G] (or G) has the multiplicative Jordan decomposition property (MJD) if for every unit x of Z[G], its semisimple and unipotent parts are both contained in Z[G]. The first two conditions of the AJD theorem are equivalent to Q[G] having no nilpotent elements. AJD is inherited by subgroups and homomorphic images. MJD is inherited by subgroups. AJD implies MJD, so MJD is the more interesting property. We discuss the classification problem for MJD. D. S. Passman (U. W. Madison) Jordan Decomposition Brussels Conference 4 / 15

Wedderburn Components (AHP) If Z[G] has MJD, then all Wedderburn components of Q[G] have degree 3. Using a result of Gow and Huppert, one gets Corollary If Z[G] has MJD, then G has a normal abelian subgroup N with G/N being a 2, 3-group. In particular, G is solvable. D. S. Passman (U. W. Madison) Jordan Decomposition Brussels Conference 5 / 15

Example: n = 4 Let a, b Z with ab 4. Set 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 x = 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 a and y = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 Then 1 + z = (1 + x)(1 + y) is a unit, with 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 2 /b z = 0 0 a 0 0 0 ab a and z s = 0 0 a 0 0 0 ab a 0 0 b 0 0 0 b 0 D. S. Passman (U. W. Madison) Jordan Decomposition Brussels Conference 6 / 15

Nilpotent Elements (HPW) Let Z[G] have MJD, let z be a nilpotent element of Z[G], and let e be a central idempotent of Q[G]. Then ez Z[G]. The trick is to modify the nilpotent elements in the other components to make them separable. [ ] For example, when [ n ] = 2, nilpotent x is 0 1 0 0 similar to x = and if we let y = then 0 0 1 0 (1 + x)(1 + ry) = [ ] r + 1 1 r 1 is a unit with distinct eigenvalues for all r Z with r 0, 4. D. S. Passman (U. W. Madison) Jordan Decomposition Brussels Conference 7 / 15

Two Consequences Corollary (HPW) Assume G has MJD. If 1 N G and H N = 1, then Q[H] has no nilpotent elements. Corollary (Lp) Assume G has MJD. If N G and N J, then NJ G. In particular, if N G is not cyclic, then G/N is Dedekind. Use e = N/ N and z = Ĵg(1 j). D. S. Passman (U. W. Madison) Jordan Decomposition Brussels Conference 8 / 15

p-groups (Lp) Let G be a p-group with MJD. Then all noncyclic subgroups are normal. Let G be a non-dedekind p-group all of whose noncyclic subgroups are normal. Then G is one of the following: 1 A metacyclic group with G = p. 2 G = ZG 0, the central product of a cyclic group Z with a nonabelian p-group G 0 of order p 3. 3 p = 2 and G = Z Q 8, where Z is cyclic. 4 One of a number of 2-groups of order 2 7. 5 A nonregular group of order 3 4. D. S. Passman (U. W. Madison) Jordan Decomposition Brussels Conference 9 / 15

2-Groups (HPW) Let G be a 2-group of order 64. The Z[G] has MJD if and only if G is a Dedekind group. The answer is known for all 2-groups of smaller order. The original HPW proof was impressive and technical. It first classified all 2-groups of order 32 with MJD. Then used induction to handle all 267 groups of order 64. Then used induction to finish the proof. Later, Liu offered a shorter proof using the preceding work. In particular, one knows which are the important groups to test. D. S. Passman (U. W. Madison) Jordan Decomposition Brussels Conference 10 / 15

Wedderburn Components of Degree 3 (Lp) Let Q[G] have a Wedderburn component W of degree 3. If Z[G] has a unit whose projection to W is central and of infinite multiplicative order, then Z[G] does not have MJD. The idea is to use a unit x of the form 1 a 0 1 0 a 2 /(b 1) x = 0 1 a x s = 0 1 a 0 0 b 0 0 b with b 1 a central unit and a 0. To construct this element, we need (b 1)e 3,3 Z[G], so (b 1) mz[g] for some integer m. We obtain b by taking a suitably large power of the given central unit. D. S. Passman (U. W. Madison) Jordan Decomposition Brussels Conference 11 / 15

Two Consequences Corollary (Lp) Let G be a nonabelian 3-group. If G has a cyclic central subgroup of order 9, then Z[G] does not have MJD. Corollary (Lp) Let G be the noncommutative semidirect product G = C p C 3 k where C p is cyclic of prime order p, C 3 k = g is cyclic of order 3 k, and g 3 centralizes C p. If p 7, then Z[G] does not have MJD. For the latter, suppose ε is a primitive p th root of unity and let σ be an automophism of Z[ε] of order 3. Then R = Z[ε] σ has degree (p 1)/3 over Z. Hence R has a unit of infinite multiplicative order provided p > 7. If p = 7 and k = 1, it is known, by (A), that G has MJD. D. S. Passman (U. W. Madison) Jordan Decomposition Brussels Conference 12 / 15

3-Groups (Lp) If G is a 3-group, then Z[G] has MJD if and only if G is abelian or one of the two nonabelian groups of order 3 3 = 27. The original proof was painfully slow and appeared in three different papers. Later, using the fact that all noncyclic subgroups are normal and the material on Wedderburn components of degree 3, a fairly efficient proof could be offered. D. S. Passman (U. W. Madison) Jordan Decomposition Brussels Conference 13 / 15

2, 3-Groups (Lp) Let G be a nonabelian 2, 3-group with order divisible by 6. Then Z[G] has MJD if and only if 1 G = Sym 3, the symmetric group of degree 3, 2 G = x, y x 3 = 1, y 4 = 1, y 1 xy = x 1, the generalized quaternion group of order 12, or 3 G = Q 8 C 3, the direct product of the quaternion group of order 8 with the cyclic group of order 3. At this point, we are fairly close to the end. D. S. Passman (U. W. Madison) Jordan Decomposition Brussels Conference 14 / 15

The Remaining Groups According to (HPW) there are three families of nonabelian groups that remain to be considered: 1 G = Q 8 C p, where p is a prime 5. Furthermore 2 has even multiplicative order modulo p. (Recall that if 2 has odd order modulo p, then Z[G] has AJD and hence MJD.) 2 G = C 7 C 3 k, where C 3 k = g, is cyclic of order 3 k and g 3 acts trivially on C 7. (Recall that Arora showed that Z[G] has MJD when k = 1.) It follows from work of Amitsur that Q[G] has only one Wedderburn component of degree > 1, namely the one where g 3 maps to 1. Indeed, if k > 1, then G embeds in a division ring. 3 G = C p C 2 k, where C p is cyclic of prime order p 5, C 2 k = g, is cyclic of order 2 k, and g acts like the inverse map on C p. If k = 1, then G is dihedral, so Z[G] satisfies AJD and hence MJD. If k = 2, then G is generalized quaternion and satisfies MJD by (AHP). The problem is open for k 3. D. S. Passman (U. W. Madison) Jordan Decomposition Brussels Conference 15 / 15