Implementation of the Political Declaration on energy cooperation between the North Seas Countries. Support Group 1 on Maritime Spatial Planning

Similar documents
1. Baltic SCOPE Towards coherence and cross-border solutions in Baltic Maritime Spatial Plans

Maritime Spatial Planning

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Netherlands

The Danish Maritime Spatial Data Infrastructure (MSDI) Geodata of the Sea

MARINE PLANNING IN THE NETHERLANDS

Marine Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

MSP Process drawings and descriptions

The Baltic Sea Region Maritime Spatial Planning Data Expert Sub-group. First Report 2015/2016/

HELCOM-VASAB Maritime Spatial Planning Working Group Twelfth Meeting Gdansk, Poland, February 2016

Identification of maritime spatial planning best practices in the Baltic Sea Region and other EU maritime regions

Findings and recommendations from Central Baltic case

Aquaculture Spatial Planning: The case of Greece

Outline National legislative & policy context Regional history with ESSIM ESSIM Evaluation Phase Government Integration via RCCOM Regional ICOM Framew

Marine Spatial Planning as an important tool for implementing the MSFD

SPLAN-Natura Towards an integrated spatial planning approach for Natura th January, 2017 Brussels. Commissioned by DG Environment

Geological information for Europe : Towards a pan-european Geological Data Infrastructure

Maritime Spatial Planning: Transboundary Cooperation in the Celtic Seas Looking Ahead

Marine Spatial Planning (MSP): A practical approach to ecosystembased

Country Fiche Estonia

Maritime Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

INSPIRE - A Legal framework for environmental and land administration data in Europe

MODELS AND TOOLS FOR GOVERNANCE OF

ESBN. Working Group on INSPIRE

INSPIRE Directive. Status June 2007

INSPIRE Monitoring and Reporting Implementing Rule Draft v2.1

Bathymetry. EMODnet Stakeholder Conference & Sea-basin Workshops February Bathymetry

Country Fiche Estonia

Marine Spatial Management Tool

Maritime Spatial Planning Framework Directive Supported by INSPIRE

Natura 2000 in the marine environment: state of implementation and next steps

GIS From Storing to Sharing. Esben Munk Sørensen

Marine Spatial Planning Experience from Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany) By Susan Toben

National Perspectives - Portugal. Margarida Almodovar

Towards coherent maritime spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region, transnational and project perspective Talis Linkaits Head of VASAB Secretariat

Introduction to EMODnet

Offshore Energy and Maritime Spatial Planning in the German EEZ

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Malta

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Ireland

Arctic Spatial Data Infrastructure Enabling Access to Arctic Location-Based Information

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE France

Natura 2000 and spatial planning. Executive summary

Ministry of ICT of I.R.IRAN

The Swedish National Geodata Strategy and the Geodata Project

Marine Spatial Planning Leslie-Ann McGee Battelle Memorial Institute

THE ROLE OF SPATIAL PLANNING IN INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE INTERREG III B BALTCOAST PROJECT

Marine/Maritime Spatial Planning Andrej Abramić

Policy framework The Netherlands and the Polar Regions, Summary and priorities

A National Ocean Policy for Malaysia: Rationale and Proposed Components. Mohd Nizam Basiron and Cheryl Rita Kaur Maritime Institute of Malaysia

HELSINKI COMMISSION Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

The Added Value of Geospatial Data in a Statistical Office. Pedro Diaz Munoz Director Sectoral and Regional Statistics EUROSTAT European Commission

BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT

IHO STAKEHOLDERS FORUM. Hydrographic data and its role in MSDI. Thursday 27 September Jens Peter Hartmann KMS

Implementation of the ESPON 2020 cooperation program. 16 January 2017 Anneloes van Noordt

EUSAIR on sea topics from Slovenian perspective

IHO MSDI Forum 30 January 2013 The IHO perspective - Is there a new role for national HO and IHO?

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Estonia

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Croatia

Country Fiche Lithuania

Mapping of marine habitats in shallow coastal areas in Denmark

Tackling MSP integration challenges in the BSR

Inspire Conference Istanbul, 2012 Ralf Lindgren. Inspire Conference Istanbul, 2012 Ralf Lindgren

Designing Networks of Marine Protected Areas in DFO s Three Atlantic Bioregions

Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe (INSPIRE) Steve Peedell

CONFERENCE STATEMENT

MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING & MARINE CADASTRE: CHALLENGES AND ISSUES

Maritime Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

INSPIRE Basics. Vlado Cetl European Commission Joint Research Centre.

Information System as a Tool for Marine Spatial Planning The SmartSea Vision and a Prototype

Transboundary issues in Estonian context

EA SEA-WAY Project. 7 th Coordination Meeting. WP5 Development of sustainable passenger transport models for the Adriatic basin and capacity building

Adding value to Copernicus services with member states reference data

The ESPON Programme. Goals Main Results Future

Marine Base Maps in Coastal Norway: A Case for Developing Sustainable Blue Growth in Coastal Communities

Arctic ecosystem services: TEEB Arctic Scoping study. Alexander Shestakov WWF Global Arctic Programme 3 December Arctic Biodiversity Congress

BURGAS CASE STUDY: LAND-SEA INTERACTIONS. Dr. Margarita Stancheva

New COST Action: Towards a European Network on Chemical Weather Forecasting and Information Systems

PLAN BOTHNIA MSP 1/2011 PLAN BOTHNIA. PLAN BOTHNIA short description (document 3/1) PLAN BOTHNIA MSP 1 Pori, Finland, March

INSPIRE a backbone in spatially enabling the digital maritime society in the Baltic Sea region

Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe (INSPIRE)

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. establishing an infrastructure for spatial information in the Community

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Czech Republic

Using Data and Evidence to Inform Marine Spatial Planning

The HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan and Marine Spatial Planning

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Finland

Evaluation of Spatial Planning as a Tool for Integrated Marine Management Status, Obstacles and Research Gaps

Ecosystem-Based Approach in MSP

SDI-Challenges European perspective

North Sea Ballast Water Exchange Area

Key Indicators for Territorial Cohesion & Spatial Planning Stakeholder Workshop - Project Update. 13 th December 2012 San Sebastián, Basque Country

Coastal Mapping Follow on? Bruno Frachon Corine Lochet Gaël Morvan

2018/1 The integration of statistical and geospatial information. The Regional Committee of UN-GGIM: Americas:

BalticBOOST Appendix 1, WP 3.3 Deliverable 1 Final report 14 February 2017

The Spatial Offshore Grid Plan for the German Exclusive Economic Zone

SIMCelt Supporting Implementation of Maritime Spatial Planning in the Celtic Seas. Patrice Laporte

How to integrate maritime cultural heritage into maritime spatial planning?

ADRIPLAN: an EU funded pilot project on MSP in the Adriatic Ionian Region Pierpaolo Campostrini CORILA and CNR-ISMAR

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Denmark

Derogation Criteria for the Requirements for Generators Network Code

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING IN THE MEDITERRANEAN

VISION FOR THE FUTURE: Marine Spatial Planning in Belgium

Transcription:

Implementation of the Political Declaration on energy cooperation between the North Seas Countries Support Group 1 on Maritime Spatial Planning Work Programme 1. Work area as outlined in Annex I to the political declaration Participating countries will work on: Coordinating the planning and development of offshore wind and grid projects beyond national borders including area mapping; Developing a common environmental assessment framework; Increasing the availability and interoperability of marine data for planning, impact assessment, licensing and operations; Exchanging best practices on site preparation and the handling of unexploded ordnance; Exchanging best practices on permitting procedures and work on the modalities of a coordinated permitting process for concrete regional or sub-regional joint offshore projects. The priority for the first years is on the first three items. As much as possible use will be made of existing networks, cooperation platforms and projects to avoid double work. 2. s and deliverables (2016-2019) Deliverable 1 Coordinating the planning and development of offshore wind and grid projects beyond national borders including area mapping Outline of a coherent wind energy plan for the mid and long term, with an emphasis on the cross border aspects, including spatial plan and taking into account land sea interactions. Relevant elements of the plan are: Inventory of ongoing projects (location, size, status, timelines). This could also be used as starting point for other work areas (therefore maybe a role for Coordinating Committee). Possible economic benefits for future projects (macroeconomic and societal cost reduction) due to choice of locations Infrastructure links Relation to other users and uses (i.e. shipping, oil & gas, etc.) Possibilities within the environmental limits (see Deliverable 2); Identification and assessment of benefits, priorities and methodologies to improve cross - border planning Timing/planning of different scenarios for future projects (development of a project pipeline) 1

Questions to be addressed What are possible areas of the North Sea (both national and international) which could be developed for wind energy? (a preliminary overview of national spatial plans and wind energy plans can be found in Annex 1) How would these be integrated into existing or future maritime spatial plans? What time horizon is logically connected to these areas, based on the demand for offshore renewables? Can these potential areas be developed according to different scenarios? What is the relation to other uses in these areas? How can these relations reduce macroeconomic and societal costs? What could be limiting or critical factors which hamper the development of these areas? Which stakeholders need to be involved? And how will they be involved at which stage? Deliverable 2 Developing a common environmental assessment framework for MSP An agreed common method for an environmental assessments framework. Focussing on: Common development of knowledge (incl. cause-effect relations) on the environmental effects of offshore wind Common species/habitats that are affected by windfarm development Cross border cumulative effect Agreement on the scope of the spatial and time dimensions to be used in environmental assessments Questions to be addressed Applicability at the operational level of the common method/approach is key. What are the common ambitions of parties that will work on a common method What methods of environmental assessment are available in the participating countries and what are the common elements? Which method can be applied when accumulating environmental impacts? What type of data, information and knowledge is (more) required? What research is further needed? Can there be a synchronisation/coordination between the national SEA procedures when establishing/changing the plans? What are the industry requirements (good practice of procedures, list differences and list the order of 2

importance for harmonization)? Which stakeholders need to be involved? And how will they be involved at which stage? Deliverable 3 Increasing the availability and interoperability of marine data for planning, impact assessment, licensing and operations Identification of data needs o Regulatory needs (for data which is needed for planning, licensing, permits) o Inventory of industry needs for data Specification of the datasets Check if adoption of common EMODnet based standards could be used for data and data products to facilitate sharing of compatible data across sectors and borders Collection of new data or products that are presently not covered by EMODnet and delivery to EMODnet through data ingestion Advise to extend/change EMODnet standards for the needs of MSP Provision of data and services according to the MSPneeds Feasibility of a European MSP-Data-Portal/connectivity with EMODnet Questions to be addressed What further data and information are required? How can data portals be linked to EMODnet? What standards best support harmonisation of additional marine data not covered by EMODnet across national boundaries, are these currently supported, and how do we ensure data cohesion? What are the regulatory needs? What are the industry needs? What do they have, want and need (to reduce costs)? Deliverable 4 Exchanging best practices on site preparation and the handling of unexploded ordnance Overview of best practices for on site preparation and the handling of unexploded ordnance, including the related environmental impact, building on existing work undertaken by Regional Sea Conventions. Questions to be addressed What are the different practices in the Member States? What developed common approach would save 3

more money? Deliverable 5 Exchanging best practices on permitting procedures and work on the modalities of a coordinated permitting process for concrete regional or sub-regional joint offshore projects Develop and agree on modalities of a coordinated permitting process for concrete regional or sub-regional joint offshore projects. Ensuring the interface with maritime spatial planning by including linkages with the national maritime spatial plans and processes. Questions to be addressed What are the necessary elements to be included in a coordinated permitting process in order to reduce administrative workload, burdens and to reduce cost for the MS and end users. 4

Annex 1: Available maps and plans A number of countries in the North Sea have their maritime spatial plan already adopted: Belgium (2014); England (2014); Scotland (2015); Germany (2009), Norway (2013), the Netherlands (2016). Find links to these plans at: https://www.noordzeeloket.nl/internationaal/plannen_van_buurlanden/ Find more info on maritime spatial planning at European level, including North Sea countries at: http://msp-platform.eu/ With regard to existing activities at sea, each country has its own maps which can be found through these links. Important features in the national maps are: shipping routes, marine protected areas, oil and gas installations, cables and pipelines, wind farms, defense areas, sand mining areas, etc. There is no North Sea wide map with all the existing uses. There are sectoral maps for the North Sea, for instance with all the MPA s (OSPAR) or shipping routes (IMO). The website http://www.4coffshore.com/windfarms/ gives a good and up-to-date overview of existing and planned wind farms at the North Sea. It gives information on owner, status, capacities, etc. by clicking on the allocations. It is not always clear what is the planning in time for the development of these wind farms. There are however different stages identified: development zone; pre-construction; fully commissioned; application submitted; consent authorized. 5